Copeland
-
Upload
ahmedsadek -
Category
Documents
-
view
556 -
download
5
description
Transcript of Copeland
CARL eLearning Report & UpdateCARL eLearning Report & Update
Lynn Copeland
Simon Fraser University Library
CARL/ARL Ottawa May 17, 2006
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
IntroductionIntroduction
“A university is defined by the quality of its academic conversations, not by the technologies that service them.”
Diana Laurillard
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
Why librarians’ involvement slow to comeWhy librarians’ involvement slow to come
Traditional role not course-specific
Librarians as a whole haven’t made their case
Administrators and educators haven’t bought in
CARL campus elearning and Libraries
0 9 18 27
WebCT/Blackberry etc.
Teaching Online
Online guides
Online tutorials
Services to fac include
Interactive Online tutorial
Services to online users
Library as resource
Inst
Inst
Lib
Lib
Lib
Lib
Lib
Inst
2005
2003
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
A very few Canadian examplesA very few Canadian examples
Univ. Victoria SFU Library UBC Library U Calgary Library York U Library …
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
Library resources: core value Library resources: core value
In 2002/03, CARL academic libraries subscribed to 297,108 electronic journals, representing 46% of their serials subscriptions, and the number is growing.
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
Librarian involvement: core valueLibrarian involvement: core value
“... the average essay grade is … a whole 2 grade points improved over last year. I suspect this is in no small part due to you and your excellent orientation.”
330,000 students at CARL institutions receive instruction
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
Librarian involvement core value (2)Librarian involvement core value (2)
Library instruction searching self-efficacy
Frequent use of library databases self-efficacy
Posttraining self-efficacy grade point up
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
Reasons for library/CMS integrationReasons for library/CMS integration
‘Value of going back’ esp. for EAL students; students learn at own pace
Students preference to stay inside domain (webct); students ‘live’ in WebCt; learning is contextual
Avoid reinvention of library wheel
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
General issues:General issues:
Student preference for familiar Extend DE model, f2f model Library should be in context not just a ‘resource’ Building content within course:
– Information dates and must be re-copied– Multiple static copies of the same material – Quiz content not easily imported
Student evaluation is within course Authentication/authorization Cross-course referral/link/eval within one platform
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
OCLC Best Practices: Technical and Functional OCLC Best Practices: Technical and Functional
Information windows Aggregate access Provide bibliographic tools: easy
searching and reference completions Provide content in user-customized
formats Integrate plagiarism software
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
OCLC Best Practices: Technical and CulturalOCLC Best Practices: Technical and Cultural
Embed library resources in course management systems
Integrate commercial information services Customize personal preferences Provide virtual reference at point of need Embed information seeking training modules
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
IMS Resource List interoperabilityBest practice and ImplementationIMS Resource List interoperabilityBest practice and Implementation
First focus – reading lists (ie ereserves) Content Packaging: Create/read/delete
– Copyright issues– Time sensitive
Digital repositories: Search/expose, gather/expose, submit/store, request/deliver, alert/expose
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
IMS Stakeholders:IMS Stakeholders:
Learners: Faculty: in their course environment Instructional designers:working with
an authoring tool Librarians: a combination of library
services
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
IMS Use casesIMS Use cases
Resource List Is Created Online Public Access Catalog Records for Course Reserves Resource List Is Shared Supplying the Learner with a Course Reading List Resource List is Created from Harvested Meta-data Resource List can include Local Content Extensibility for Vendor Specific Needs Propagate changes Harvesting and Reusing Facilitating Reuse via Annotations (References) Library digital repository archives selected resource lists Resource list can be empty
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
JISC/ELF Framework: Library rolesJISC/ELF Framework: Library roles
Application Services: 6,8 of 17 Common Services: 13,9 of 38
Library roles are closely or somewhat tied to 36 of 55 services in the ELF framework
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
SFU Library: ‘Our Library is where YOU are’SFU Library: ‘Our Library is where YOU are’
Liaison Librarian model: – Discipline based partnership– Collections, instruction, reference
Strong systems division– Local development
Presence on key committees, decisions
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
Reasons for optimism wrt LMS’sReasons for optimism wrt LMS’s
SAKAI, WebCT features JISC/ELF: library components in
framework DEST CARL position paper shows librarians’
engagement; Pamphlet, web site will enable libraries
to engage faculty, admin locally
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
SAKAISAKAI
MIT: – integrate library content, – Integrate librarian functionality– eReserves via News tool
Yale: via new librarian role & library toolkit– Integrate links via individual course resources tool– Pre- and post-tests– Guides, contact info, chat ref etc.
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
WebCT CE v.6; VistaWebCT CE v.6; Vista
Powerlinks potential to include library resources
‘guest’ accounts
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
OtherOther
Moodle CREE
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
Report RecommendationsReport Recommendations
Make connections Advocate Educate
Local National International
CARL/ARL 2006: CARL eLearning Report & Update -- Lynn Copeland, SFU -- May 17, 2006, Ottawa
UpdateUpdate
Report, pamphlet distributed CARL represented on CanKNOW STC CARL represented at CCL Strat. Pl. Web ‘best practices’ site will shortly be
developed Presenting at eLearning conferences Cdn gov’t investment
“Why should we put up with overcrowded classes & facilities”--- Len Norris