Convective heat transfer and pressure drop in v corrugated
-
Upload
mohamed-fadl -
Category
Engineering
-
view
142 -
download
9
Transcript of Convective heat transfer and pressure drop in v corrugated
ORIGINAL
Convective heat transfer and pressure drop in V-corrugatedchannel with different phase shifts
Mohamed Sakr
Received: 12 September 2013 / Accepted: 24 June 2014
� Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Abstract New energy system development and energy
conservation require high performance heat exchanger, so
the researchers are seeking to find new methods to enhance
heat transfer mechanism in heat exchangers. The objectives
of this study are investigating heat transfer performance
and flow development in V-corrugated channels, numerical
simulations were carried out for uniform wall heat flux
equal 290 W/m2 using air as a working fluid, Reynolds
number varies from 500 to 2,000, phase shifts,
0� \ Ø \ 180�, and channel heights (S = 12.5, 15.0, 17.5
and 20 mm). Governing equations of flow and energy were
solved numerically by using finite volume method. The
numerical results indicated that, wavy (V-corrugated)
channels have a significant impact on heat transfer
enhancement with increase in pressure drop though chan-
nel due to breaking and destabilizing in the thermal
boundary layer are occurred as fluid flowing through the
corrugated surfaces and the effect of corrugated phase shift
on the heat transfer and fluid flow is more significant in
narrow channel, the goodness factor (j/f) was increased
with increasing channel phase shift, the best performance
was noticed on phase shift, Ø = 180� and channel height,
S = 12.5 mm.
Abbreviations
PRESTO Pressure staggering option
RNG Renormalized group
SIMPLE Semi-implicit method for pressure-linked
equations
UDF User defined function
List of symbols
A Height of the wavy (mm)
Cp Specific heat (J/kg K)
Ce Turbulent model constant
Cl Turbulent model constant
Dh Hydraulic diameter (mm)
f Friction factor
h Heat transfer coefficient (W/m2 K)
I Turbulent intensity
j Colburn factor [Nu/(Re Pr^(1/3))]
k Thermal conductivity of the fluid (W/m K)
L Length of the domain (mm)
_m Mass flow rate (kg/s)
P Wavy pitch (mm)
p Pressure (Pa)
Q Heat transfer rate (kW)
q Heat flux (W/m2)
Pr Prandtl number (Pr = Cpl/k)
Qin Heat input rate (W)
Re Reynolds number (Re = quavDh/l)
S Channel spacing (mm)
T Temperature
u Velocity component at x-direction (m/s)
v Velocity component at y-direction (m/s)
w Width (mm)
y? Dimensionless distance from the cell center to the
nearest wall
Greek symbols
d Height of the base (mm)
e Dissipation kinetic energy (m2/s3)
M. Sakr (&)
Civil Engineering, Architecture and Building (CAB),
Faculty of Engineering and Computing, Coventry University,
Coventry CV1 5FB, UK
e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
123
Heat Mass Transfer
DOI 10.1007/s00231-014-1390-5
h Wavy angle
l Dynamic viscosity of the fluid (Pa s)
q Air density (kg/m3)
r Length of corrugated (mm)
rk Diffusion Prandtl number for k
ss Wall shear stress
m Kinematic viscosity of the fluid (m2/s)
Ø Phase shift
Subscripts
a Air
av Average
i Inlet
m Mean value
o Outlet
t Total
w Wall
1 Introduction
Heat exchangers are commonly used in industrial and
engineering applications such as heaters, oil cooling,
evaporator and condenser for air conditioning, petro-
chemical industry, power plants and chemical process-
ing. A lot of efforts have been done to manufacture
more efficient and compact heat exchangers by using
varies techniques of heat transfer enhancement to pro-
duce heat exchanges equipment that are less expensive.
Accurate analysis of heat transfer rate efficiency and
pressure drop should be considered when design heat
exchanger, take in account, long life performance and
economic aspect.
By enhancing surface heat transfer coefficient (a) the
volume of heat exchanger decreases and become more
compact, in addition the capital cost decrease, (b) the
pumping power decreased and (c) the overall heat transfer
coefficient of the heat exchanger (UA) increased. Higher
surface heat transfer coefficient can be achieved by
boundary layer modification or surface magnification [1]
and studying the thermo-physical parameters which have
effect on the flow behaviour such as size of the recircula-
tion, velocity and temperature.
One of the most efficient ways to improve and enhance
the performance of the heat exchanger is using a corrugated
surface heat exchanger, because channel waviness always
change the local flow directions, which lead to interrupt the
thermal boundary layer on the wall and increase flow
separation, recirculation, reattachment and thereby increase
of surface heat transfer coefficient.
Characteristics of heat transfer and pressure drop in
corrugated channel are studied by different researchers
such as Mohammed et al. [2], who numerically studied the
effects of tilt angles and height of corrugated channels on
heat enhancement rate, they recommended a wavy angle
of 60� and wavy height of 2.5 mm with channel height
17.5 mm for best heat transfer enhancement. In the same
time, Elshafei et al. [3, 4] experimentally studied the
effect of channel phase shift of V-corrugated channels on
both heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of
flow. The results showed significant enhancement on the
average heat transfer coefficient and with plenty of pres-
sure drop depending upon the spacing and phase shift. Ali
and Ramadhyani [5] experimentally studied the heat
transfer in the entrance region for corrugation angle of 20�and laminar flow. It was found that; Nusselt number in
corrugated channel exceeded those in the parallel-plate
channel by 140 and 240 % and friction factor increased by
130 and 280 %.
Naphthalene sublimation technique used Gradeck et al.
[6] to determine the local and average transfer character-
istics for flow in a wavy surface channel. The visualization
explained the existence of a variety of complex transfer
processes and related fluid flow phenomena. These inclu-
ded secondary flows and associated spanwise mass transfer
variations; the suppression of the secondary flow by
counteracting centrifugal forces, and the destruction of the
secondary flow by the onset of turbulence.
Leonardo and Sparrow [7], Zhang and Chen [8], con-
cluded that heat transfer is always higher than those in
rectangular channel due to the mixing induced by recir-
culation in the wake of the corrugations.
Yin et al. [9] indicated that effect of phase shift on the
flow and heat transfer is more pronounced in higher Re
region than in lower Re region. Kanaris et al. [10] used
two-equation turbulence model to simulate low Reynolds
number flow (400–1,400) in corrugated channel calculated,
the results indicated that the mean heat transfer coefficient
sand friction factors are found to be in reasonable agree-
ment with the limited published experimental data. Pehli-
van [11], experimentally studied effect of sharp and
rounded corrugation peak on heat transfer and pressure
drop in corrugated channel, the obtained results indicated
that, the increase of corrugated angle and channel height
tends to increase heat transfer.
It is obvious from the literature review above that, the
enhancement heat transfer using corrugated passages is one
of the interesting methods to improve the performance of
the heat exchanger. Most of the previous research focused
on V-corrugated channels whose all configuration peaks lie
in line-phase arrangement. In the present paper, the main
objectives are studying the effect of channel heights on
convective heat transfer characteristics and pressure drop
in the channel with V-corrugated upper and lower plates
with different phase shifts 0�, 90� and 180� under constant
wall heat flux.
Heat Mass Transfer
123
2 Mathematical formulations
2.1 Channel geometry
The schematic diagram of the present problem under
investigation is shown in Fig. 1. It consists of two opposite
corrugated plates and the details of the corrugated plate are
listed in Table 1.
Air is selected as a working fluid, while the geometry is
assumed as two-dimensional because the width of the
channel is very large compared with the channel height. A
set of different phase lag or shifts (Ø) between the upper
and lower wavy plates were considered; for phase shift
Ø = 0�, the crest of the lower wall corresponds to the crest
of upper plated, Ø = 90� one of the walls has a phase–
advanced/lag of half pitch; for Ø = 180�, the crest of the
lower corrugated wall corresponds to trough of the upper
corrugated wall of the channel as shown in Fig. 2. All
corrugated channels have the same corrugation angle, h of
20�; each corrugated plate has eleven crests separated by a
distance/pitch, P = 27.27 mm.
2.2 Governing equations
Flow governing equations (velocity and momentum),
energy equation for turbulent flow and heat transfer were
considered in this simulation. The following assumptions
were employed, two dimensional flow, steady state, tur-
bulent and no slip at the wall.
Based on the above assumptions, the governing equa-
tions can be written as follows [12, 13].
2.2.1 Mass conservation
oðquiÞoðXiÞ
¼ 0 ð1Þ
where ui is flow axial velocity.
2.2.2 Momentum conservation
oðquiujÞoðXjÞ
¼ � oP
oðXiÞþ o
oðXjÞl
oui
oXj
þ ouj
oXi
� 2
3dij
oui
oXj
� �� �
þ o
o Xj
� � �q0uiu0j
� ð2Þ
The symbols l, u0 and uj are the fluid viscosity, fluctu-
ated velocity and the velocity in y-direction respectively,
the term u0i u0j is the turbulent shear stress.
2.2.3 Energy equation
o
oðXjÞuiðqE þ PÞ½ � ¼ o
oðXjÞk þ Cplt
Prt
� �oT
oXj
þ uiðsijÞeff
� �
ð3Þ
Y
X
Uniform wall heat Flux, q''
Pθ
S
A
δ
Lt
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of
the corrugated channel
Flow direction
o o=0 =90 =180o
Fig. 2 Typical configuration of
the corrugated channel
representation
Table 1 Dimensions of the corrugated channel
Height of
the wavy
(mm)
Height of
the base
(mm)
Mean
spacing
(mm)
Length of the
domain (mm)
Number
of the
wavy
5 2.5 12.5 300 11
5 2.5 15.0 300 11
5 2.5 17.5 300 11
5 2.5 20.0 300 11
Heat Mass Transfer
123
where E is the total energy, E = CpT ? P/q ? u2/2, Prt is
the turbulent Prandtl number, and (sij) is the deviatoric
stress tensor.
sij
� �eff¼ leff
ouj
oXi
þ oui
oXj
� �� 2
3leff
oui
oXj
dij ð4Þ
The most of widely two-equations turbulence model k–ewas used here, which proposed by Launder and Spalding
[14], which has ability to predict the secondary flow
motion, it consists two equation for turbulent kinetic
energy k and the dissipation rate of the turbulent kinetic
energy e. The equations for turbulent kinetic energy (k) and
rate of dissipation (e) are given by:
2.2.4 Turbulent kinetic energy (k) equation
o
oðXiÞqkui½ � ¼ o
oðXjÞlþ lt
rk
� �ok
oXj
� �þ Gk � qe ð5Þ
2.2.5 Turbulent kinetic energy dissipation (e) equation
o
oðXiÞqeui½ � ¼ o
oðXjÞlþ lt
re
� �oeoXj
� �þ C1e
ek
� Gk
þ C2eqe2
k
� �ð6Þ
In the above equations, Gk represents the generation of
turbulent kinetic energy due to mean velocity gradient, rk
and re are effective Prandtl number for turbulent kinetic
energy and rate of dissipation, respectively; C1e and C2e are
constants and lt is the eddy viscosity and is modelled as:
lt ¼qClk2
e
!ð7Þ
The empirical constants for the turbulent model are
arriving by comprehensive data fitting for a wide range of
turbulent flow [13, 14].
Cl ¼ 0:09; Ce1 ¼ 1:47; Ce2 ¼ 1:92;rk ¼ 1:0 and re ¼ 1:3
ð8Þ
3 Numerical procedure
The two-dimensional continuity, momentum and energy
equations were solved numerically. The renormalized
group (RNG) k–e turbulent was selected. The upwind and
central difference methods are used for convections and
diffusions, respectively. The FLUENT (6.3) [15] code was
used to obtain velocity and temperature distribution inside
the channel. The solution of the problem was obtained by
employing implicit method in segregated solver. The dis-
cretization is achieved by using the PRESTO method for
pressure and the second order upwind method for
momentum, energy, turbulent kinetic energy and turbulent
dissipation rate equation. The SIMPLE algorithm was used
for flow computations.
The under re-relaxation factor was selected to be 0.3 for
pressure, 0.4 for momentum, 0.8 for turbulent kinetic
energy (k), turbulent dissipation rate (e) and 1.0 for energy
equations, turbulent viscosity (lt), body force and density.
The solution convergence is met when the difference
between the residual of the algebraic equation and the
prescribed values is less than 10-6 for all variables.
3.1 Boundary and initial conditions
The solution domain was considered 2D, enclosed by inlet,
outlet and wall boundaries. On walls no-slip condition were
assumed for momentum equations. The inlet velocity val-
ues have been derived from given Reynolds numbers. To
save the computational time; the user defined function
(UDF) code was used to define hydrodynamics fully
developed flow at inlet, the outlet boundary condition is
called ‘‘pressure outlet’’, which implies a static (gauge)
pressure at the outlet boundary, which means the pressure
will be extrapolated from the flow in the interior.
The boundary conditions for a steady and two dimen-
sional flows are as follows.
3.1.1 Initial boundary conditions
At the wall:
q00 ¼ qwall ¼ 290W
m2ð9Þ
At the inlet:
The uniform profiles for all properties are as follows:
Fully developed steady flow condition,
u ¼ u yð Þ ¼ 3
2� uav 1� y2
h2
� �ð10Þ
v ¼ 0; T ¼ Tin ¼ 300:3 K; k ¼ kin; e ¼ ein ð11Þ
At the outlet:
The flow assumed as fully developed which implies
negligible stream wise gradient of all variables.
o;on¼ 0; ; ¼ u; v; k and e ð12Þ
The turbulent kinetic energy, kin and the turbulent dis-
sipation ein, at the inlet section are approximated from the
turbulent intensity I as follows [13].
kin ¼3
2ðuinIÞ2; ein ¼ C
34l
k32
Lð13Þ
In the present study, the turbulence characteristic length,
L is set to be 0.07 Dh and the turbulent intensity level I, is
Heat Mass Transfer
123
defined as the ratio of the root-mean-square of velocity
fluctuation, u0, to the mean flow velocity, u, as follows:
I ¼ u0
u� 100 % ð14Þ
3.2 Heat transfer coefficient and Nusselt number
The current numerical simulation is aimed to study the
influence of channel phase shift on heat transfer charac-
teristics and pressure drop for a fully developed flow in
narrow V-corrugated channels.
Various parameters were studied such as, geometries of
the channel including its spacing, the Reynolds number
and channel phase shift. The average reference velocity in
the channel, uav was calculated by the Reynolds number
based on the channel hydraulic diameter which is defined
as:
uav ¼Re tDh
ð15Þ
where Dh is expressed as [16]
Dh ¼4SW
2 S + Wð Þ ¼ 2S ð16Þ
Because the channel width is too large compared to
channel height W � S.
The rate of heat input Qin to channel wall is supposed to
be totally dissipated to the air flowing through the channel
passage, rising it temperature from inlet temperature Ta,i to
exit average air temperature Ta,o
Qin ¼ _mCp Ta;o � Ta;i
� �ð17Þ
and
Ta ¼R Ac
0uTadAcrR Ac
0udAcr
ð18Þ
where _m, is air mass flow rate kg/s, and Cp, specific heat of
the air with the heat input, the average heat transfer coef-
ficient along the corrugated channel hc, was calculated by
hc ¼Qin
AwðDTmÞð19Þ
where Aw, is the surface area of the corrugated plate and
the log-mean temperature difference was calculated as.
DTm ¼Tw � Ta;i
� �� Tw � Ta;o
� �ln Tw � Ta;i
� �� Tw � Ta;o
� � � ð20Þ
where Tw is average wall temperature.
Tw ¼1
r
Zr
0
Tw;xdx ð21Þ
The average heat transfer coefficient is calculated of
average Nusselt Number [2, 14] as follows:
Nu ¼ hcHrkLt
ð22Þ
where H is the half distance of the channel height, k is the
thermal conductivity of air and r is the distance from the
leading edge of the corrugated plate along the corrugated
surface.
r ¼ Lt
cosðhÞ ð23Þ
Dp
L¼
pav;o � pav;i
� �Lt
ð24Þ
where pav,o and pav,i are the surface average pressure on the
inlet and outlet of the channel. For the sake of performance
assessment of such a narrow channels, regarding their heat
transfer characteristics and pressure drop, the ratio of the
Colburn factor to friction factor, j/f is almost considered,
expressed as [4]:
j
f¼
Nu
RePr13
fð25Þ
where f is friction factors calculated by:
f ¼Dp Dh
Lt
� 12qu2
av
ð26Þ
3.3 Grid generation
Computational mesh was created using Gambit, different
structured and unstructured with several cell size were
tested by synthetically by considering simulation time
needed for specific number of iteration and the accuracy of
the solution. Because the local Reynolds number near any
wall becomes very small and owing to viscous influence, to
overcome this issue, a special a near wall modelling
approach applied to possess the accuracy of the standard
two layer approach for fine near-wall meshes, so the first
cell is placed in the laminar boundary layer, though the
laminar sub layer is valid up to y? \ 5, the nearest nodes
from the wall are located within the interval y? = 1.5–4,
where y? is the dimensional distance from the wall. The
grid independence is carried out in the analysis by adopting
different grid distribution of 3 9 104, 4 9 104, 6 9 104
and 8 9 104; the grid independence test indicated that the
grid systems of 6 9 104 ensure a satisfactory solution, this
is verified by the fact that the difference of the computed
results of an average Nusselt number with grid finer the
6 9 104 within 1 %.
Heat Mass Transfer
123
4 Result and discussion
The heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of tur-
bulent flow in corrugated channels are discussed in the
present study, considering the effect of different channel
heights (S = 12.5, 15.0, 17.5 and 20.0 mm) and variable
phase shifts, Ø = 0�, 90� and 180� using air as working
fluid. These were carried out to study these effects on the
temperature and airflow structure. The side walls of sim-
ulated channels were uniform heat flux exposed to air flow
over a range of 500 \ Re \ 2,000. The optimal perfor-
mance of a V-shaped PHE was obtained using the surface
performance Colburn and Fanning friction factor (j/f).
To validate the numerical results of the current study,
the predicted results for average wall Nusselt number and
average surface channel temperature were compared with
the previous experimental work of Naphon [17] as shown
in Figs. 3 and 4; for channel height S = 17.5 mm, phase
shift 180� and constant wall heat flux 290 W/m2, Fig. 3
shows the comparison between the predicted average sur-
face channel temperature and measured ones. In addition,
Fig. 4 shows the comparison between average air Nusselt
number in corrugated channel with the experimental work
done by Naphon [17]. It can be clearly seen from these
figures that the values obtained from the model are con-
sistent with the experimental data and lie within ±8 %
error.
4.1 Heat transfer results
Normally, corrugated channels are used to improve and
enhance heat transfer in channels; the effect of flow pas-
sage shape and spacing are effective parameters that have
important influence on heat transfer enhancement, and
these effects on the average Nusselt number will be dis-
cussed in the following subsections.
The calculated average surface Nusselt number versus
Reynolds number for both corrugated and straight channels
were plotted in Fig. 5; this figure shows that the Nusselt
number increases with the increase the Reynolds number.
Also it is noticed that the Nusselt number for corrugated
channel is higher than for the straight channel for any value
of phase shift. The percentage of heat transfer enhancement
was increased with the increase in phase shift angle due to:
the higher fluid re-circulation swirl flow intensity in the
corrugated channel larger surface area and the transverse
vortices of the bulk flow field in the wavy wall trough. Also
the turbulent intensity is enhanced when compared to the
conventional channel. This behavior results in the higher
local wall temperature gradients [17, 18].
4.1.1 Effect of channel height
The average Nusselt number as a function of the Reynolds
number for different channel heights is presented in
Figs. 6, 7 and 8. The predicted results for different channel
height, S = 12.5, 15.0, 17.5 and 20.0 mm, while keeping
400 800 1200 1600 2000
Reynolds Number
0
20
40
60
80
100
Ave
rage
Pla
te T
empe
ratu
re(°
C)
Wavy angle=20o
Inlet air temperature=27.15 ocHeat Flux=290 W/m2
Naphon
Numerical Simulation
Fig. 3 Validation of numerical results of average corrugated surface
temperature with experimental values from Naphon [17] for different
Reynolds number and wavy angle 20�
600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Reynolds Number
0
10
20
30
40
Ave
rage
Nus
selt
Num
ber
Wavy angle=20o
heat flux =290 W/m2
Naphon
Numerical simulation
Fig. 4 Validation of numerical results of average Nusselt number
with experimental values from Naphon [17] for different Reynolds
number and wavy angle 20�
Heat Mass Transfer
123
phase shift fixed, Ø = 0�, 90� and 180� will be discussed in
the next paragraphs.
For flow in the corrugated channel of Ø = 0� and
Ø = 90�; it is clear that the average Nusselt increases with
the decrease of the channel height and the increase of the
Reynolds number; for channel height S = 12.5 mm, the
average Nusselt number increases by about 30 % belongs
to the channel height S = 20 mm, also the results for the
channel heights S = 15.0 and 17.5 mm are close to each
other as shown in Figs. 6 and 7.
For phase shift Ø = 180� or the convergent divergent
passage, the heat transfer enhancement value is higher than
the corrugated channel with phase shift Ø = 0� and
Ø = 90� by value (25–50 %), because the V-shape waves
400 800 1200 1600 2000
Reynolds Number
0
10
20
30
40
Ave
rage
Nus
selt
Num
ber
Ø=90o
S=12.5 mmS=15 mmS=17.5 mmS=20 mm
Fig. 7 Average Nusselt number versus Reynolds number in corru-
gated channel of different height, Ø = 90�
400 800 1200 1600 2000
Reynolds Number
0
10
20
30
40
Ave
rage
Nus
selt
Num
ber
Ø=180o
S=12.5 mmS=15 mmS=17.5 mmS=20 mm
Fig. 8 Average Nusselt number versus Reynolds number in corru-
gated channel of different height, Ø = 180�
400 800 1200 1600 2000
Reynolds Number
0
4
8
12
16
20A
vera
ge N
usse
lt N
umbe
r
S=17.5 mmØ=0o
Ø=90o
Ø=180o
Parallel plate channel
Fig. 5 Averaged Nusselt Number versus Reynolds number in
corrugated of different channel phase shift, S = 17.5 mm
400 800 1200 1600 2000
Reynolds Number
0
10
20
30
40
Ave
rage
Nus
selt
Num
ber
Ø=0o
S=12.5 mmS=15 mmD=17.5 mmD=20 mmS=17.5 mmS=20 mm
Fig. 6 Average Nusselt number versus Reynolds number in corru-
gated channel of different height, Ø = 0�
Heat Mass Transfer
123
are generating swirl flow in the wavy wall trough and the
V-shaped wave has a sharp edge which has a significant
effect on the main flow distribution in the channel as shown
in Fig. 8.
4.1.2 Effect of phase shift
The effect of the different corrugated phase shifts on both
flow structure and the average Nusselt number in corru-
gated channels with different phase shifts on the average
Nusselt number for different channel heights, S = 12.5,
15.0 and 20.0 mm, are illustrated in Figs. 9, 10 and 11. It is
seen that, the average Nusselt Number has been increased
significantly with increasing the Reynolds number and the
phase shift; this is attributed to changing the phase shift of
corrugated plates changing the geometry configuration and
has significant effect on the change flow structure and the
presence of recirculation cells accompanied with corru-
gated channel. The strength of such promoted cells depends
on the Reynolds number and the channel spacing as dis-
cussed by Zhang et al. [19] and Yuan et al. [20].
Over the tested range of the Reynolds number, the
average Nusselt number generally gets higher values with
Ø = (90� and 180�) than those of phase shift Ø = 0�. The
effect of the changing phase shift for this narrow passage
on the average Nusselt number seems to be higher than
wider channels.
From the previous results, it could be concluded that the
effect of the phase shift on heat transfer in corrugated
channels is variable and depends on the value of the
channel height. Good enhancement in heat transfer was
achieved with the channel of Ø = (90� and 180�) for rel-
atively narrow channel (S = 12.5). Based on the results
reported by Zhang et al. [19], who concluded that the lat-
eral vortices and recirculation cells were generated by
wavy wall structure with convergent–divergent passage
Ø = 180�. These effects are more pronounced in narrow
400 800 1200 1600 2000
Reynolds Number
0
10
20
30
Ave
rgag
e N
usse
lt N
umbe
r
S=12.5mmØ=0o
Ø=90o
Ø=180o
Fig. 9 Average Nusselt number versus Reynolds number in corru-
gated channel of different phase shift and S = 12.5 mm
400 800 1200 1600 2000
Reynolds Number
0
4
8
12
16
20
Ave
rage
Nus
selt
Num
ber
S=15 mm
Ø=0o
Ø=90o
Ø=180o
Fig. 10 Average Nusselt number versus Reynolds number in corru-
gated channel of different phase shift and S = 15.0 mm
400 800 1200 1600 2000
Reynolds Number
0
2
4
6
8
10
Ave
rage
Nus
selt
Num
ber
S=20 mm
Ø=0o
Ø=90o
Ø=180o
Fig. 11 Average Nusselt number versus Reynolds number in corru-
gated channel of different phase shift and S = 20.0 mm
Heat Mass Transfer
123
channel. The other remarkable conclusion that by changing
corrugated surface phase shift, the recirculation zone
behind the V-rib moved and flow attachment on the base
wall and the recirculation eddies are formed above these
flow region.
4.2 Pressure drop results
The pressure drop is another important parameter to be
considered in designing the heat exchanger. The variation
of the pressure drop per unit length with the Reynolds
number among the tested corrugated channels at wavy
angle 20� and channel height 12.5 mm is shown in
Fig. 12.
It can be seen that the pressure drop gradually increases
with the increase of the Reynolds number also with
changing the corrugated the phase shift of the corrugated
channel, because the corrugated channel surface produced
drag forces exerted on the flow field and also produced
turbulence augmentation and rotational flow [20].
The pressure drop a function of the Reynolds number in
narrow corrugated channel (S = 12.5 mm) and in wide
channel (S = 20 mm) at different phase shift, Ø = 0�,
Ø = 90� and Ø = 180� are plotted in Figs. 13, 14 and 15
respectively. These figures illustrate that for any value of
the phase shift, the pressure drop gradually increases with
the increasing of the Reynolds number. Over the tested
range of the Reynolds number, the pressure drop increases
with the decrease of the channel heights and increase of the
phase shift. In the meantime, as the channel becomes
wider, the pressure drop gets lower values. Elshafei et al.
[3] referred that to the feature of rising vortices and eddies
in the heat of the flow in the core of the corrugated channel
leading to a significant increase of pressure drop relative to
those related with parallel flow channels.
400 800 1200 1600 2000
Reynolds Number
0
10
20
30
Pre
ssur
e dr
op p
er u
nit l
engt
h(P
a/m
)
S=12.5 mm
Ø= 0o
Ø= 90o
Ø=180o
Fig. 12 Pressure versus Reynolds number for flow in corrugated
channel of different phase shift, S = 12.5 mm
400 800 1200 1600 2000
Reynolds Number
0
4
8
12
16
20
Pre
ssur
e dr
op p
er u
nit l
engt
h(P
a/m
)
Ø=0o
S=12.5 mmS=15.0 mmS=17.5 mmS=20.0 mm
Fig. 13 Pressure versus Reynolds number for flow in corrugated
channel of different channel height, Ø = 0�
400 800 1200 1600 2000
Reynolds Number
0
4
8
12
16
20
Pre
ssur
e dr
op p
er u
nit l
engt
h(P
a/m
)
Ø=90o
S=12.5 mmS=15.0 mmS=17.5 mmS=20.0 mm
Fig. 14 Pressure versus Reynolds number for flow in corrugated
channel of different channel height, Ø = 90�
Heat Mass Transfer
123
Based on the previous simulation results and their
discussion, it appears that the variation of corrugated
channel heights and the phase shift of the corrugated
plate surface have a significant impact on the increased
both of heat transfer and pressure drop in corrugated
channels.
4.3 Performance comparison
In order to compare the thermal–hydraulic performance of
the corrugated, the performance of these corrugated chan-
nels is graphed in Figs. 16, 17 and 18 as j/f versus Rey-
nolds number for different channel height and phase shift.
400 800 1200 1600 2000
Reynolds Number
0
4
8
12
16
20
Pre
ssur
e dr
op p
er u
nit l
engt
h(P
a/m
)
Ø=180o
S=12.5 mmS=15.0 mmS=17.5 mmS=20.0 mm
Fig. 15 Pressure versus Reynolds number for flow in corrugated
channel of different channel height, Ø = 180�
400 800 1200 1600 2000
Reynolds Number
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
J/f
Ø=0o
S=12.5 mmS=15.0mmS=17.5 mmS=20.0 mm
Fig. 16 Heat transfer enhancement criterion various Reynolds num-
ber for different channel height and, phase shift Ø = 0�
400 800 1200 1600 2000
Reynolds Number
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
J/f
Ø=90o
S=12.5 mmS=15.0 mmS=17.5 mmS=20.0 mm
Fig. 17 Heat transfer enhancement criterion various Reynolds num-
ber for different channel height and, phase shift Ø = 90�
400 800 1200 1600 2000
Reynolds Number
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
J/f
Ø=180o
S=12.5 mms=15.0mmS=17.5 mmS=20.0 mm
Fig. 18 Heat transfer enhancement criterion various Reynolds num-
ber for different channel height and, phase shift Ø = 180�
Heat Mass Transfer
123
A higher good factor means that more heat transfer is
obtained with the same pumping power and heat transfer
area. These two parameters were used to detect the area of
the goodness factor for flow in such channels.
It is clear from these figures that (j/f) increases with the
decrease of the channel heights also the performance ratio
is almost constant with the increase of the Reynolds
number for all channels heights. With the increase of the
corrugated channel phase shift, the values of (j/f) are
increase for the same channel height; this means phase shift
Ø = 180� offered higher (j/f).
It is found that the maximum values of performance
were obtained by using the channel height S = 12.5 mm
and the channel phase shift Ø = 180�. This indicated that,
the channel height S = 12.5 mm is the most attractive
height from the viewpoint of energy saving compared with
other heights.
The previous study indicated that for fully developed
laminar flow of a specified fluid; (j/f) is constant for a given
surface, regardless of Reynolds number because it reveals
the influence of the cross-sectional shape regardless of the
scale of the geometry [21].
4.4 Flow visualization
Figures 19 and 20 show different variables distribution
including the velocity vector, the temperature couture and
the velocity streamlines for different corrugated channel
heights, S = 12.5 and 20.0 mm, and different phase shift,
Ø = 0�, 90� and 180� for the same Re = 1,100.
As shown in Fig. 19b, c, for S = 12.5 mm, it is clear that
the effect of the phase shift on the temperature and the flow
development in the corrugated channel, that there are smaller
recirculation region and more separation bubble regions
formed in the adjacent inlet/outlet and it increases with
increase of the phase shift, which means that the influence of
the wall on the main stream becomes greater; thus generated
more swirl flow in the wavy wall due to transfer vortices of
the bulk flow field in the wavy wall trough. These results
induced higher temperature gradient near the wavy wall.
Therefore, the net heat transfer rate from the wavy wall to the
fluid increased as shown in Fig. 19a.
Figure 20a–c show the temperature couture, velocity
vectors and velocity streamlines for different channel phase
shift and S = 20.0 mm. It can be seen that the wavy wall
has less significant effect on the temperature distribution
and on the effect on the flow structure in the core. How-
ever, we can be concluded from these figures that, as fur-
ther decreasing in the channel height, the onset and the
growth of the swirl flows encompass much of the flow
field, especially in the narrow passage. In addition, the
turbulent intensity also increases due to the sharp edge of
phase shift Ø = 180� corrugated channel, these results
were reported by Yin et al. [9] and Naphon [22].
Fig. 19 Variation of a velocity vectors, b temperature contours and c streamlines for corrugated channel height S = 12.5 mm and Re = 1,100
for different phase shifts
Heat Mass Transfer
123
5 Conclusions
Corrugated channels are one of the popular techniques that
are extensively used in compacted heat exchanger manu-
facturing. Two dimensional numerical predictions were
carried out to study the effect of the wave plate shift angle,
channel heights and Reynolds number on the thermal
performance of fluid flow and heat transfer in a corrugated
channel for low Reynolds number flow. The governing
equations were solved using finite volume methods with
certain assumptions to provide a clear environment for the
case study target. The results of the average Nusselt
number, pressure drop in different phase shifts (Ø) and
channel heights (S) were presented; also, the flow charac-
teristics have been visualized using streamlines. The fol-
lowing conclusions may be drawn:
1. Corrugated channel is a good alternative for high heat
flux applications or for more efficient heat exchange
devices used in a wide variety of engineering appli-
cations like heating and air conditioning units.
2. The average Nusselt number increased by factor 2.5 up
to 3.2 relative to that parallel plate channel depending
upon the phase shift and the spacing of the corrugated
channel due to fluid flowing through the corrugated
surface, fluid re-circulation or/and swirl flows are
generated in the corrugation troughs.
3. Thermal performance of the narrow channel is rela-
tively good in comparison with the wider channel.
4. When the phase shifts (Ø) increased, the pressure drop
in the corrugated channels increased and decreased
with the increase in channel heights(s) due to drag
forces exerted on the flow field and also producing
turbulence augmentation and rotational flow.
5. The thermal–hydraulic performance is closely related
to the distribution of velocity streamline sand breaking
and destabilizing in the thermal boundary layer which
are occurred as fluid flowing through the corrugated
surfaces.
6. The channels with phase shift Ø = 180�, the most
attractive parameters from the viewpoint of energy
saving compared to others compared with the phase
shift, Ø = 0� and 90�.
References
1. Sadik K, Bergles E, Mayinger F, Hafit Y (1999) Heat transfer
enhancement of heat exchangers. Springer, Berlin
2. Mohammed HA, Abed AM, Wahid MA (2013) The effects of
geometrical parameters of a corrugated channel with in out-of-
phase arrangement. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 40:47–57
3. Elshafei EAM, Awad M, El-Negiry E, Ali AG (2008) Heat
transfer and pressure loss in narrow channels with corrugated
Fig. 20 Variation of a velocity vectors, b temperature contours and c streamlines for corrugated channel height S = 20.0 mm and Re = 1,100
for different phase shifts
Heat Mass Transfer
123
walls. In: Second international conference on thermal issues in
emerging technologies, 2008, ThETA ‘08, pp 279–290
4. Elshafei EAM, Awad MM, El-Negiry E, Ali AG (2010) Heat
transfer and pressure drop in corrugated channels. Energy
35:101–110
5. Ali MM, Ramadhyani S (1992) Experiments on convective heat
transfer in corrugated channels. Exp Heat Transf 5:175–193
6. Gradeck M, Hoareau B, Lebouche M (2005) Local analysis of
heat transfer inside corrugated channel. Int J Heat Mass Transf
48:1909–1915
7. Goldstein JL, Sparrow EM (1977) Heat/mass transfer character-
istics for flow in a corrugated wall channel. J Heat Transf
99:187–195
8. Zhang L, Chen Z (2011) Convective heat transfer in cross-cor-
rugated triangular ducts under uniform heat flux boundary con-
ditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf 54:597–605
9. Yin J, Yang G, Li Y (2012) The effects of wavy plate phase shift
on flow and heat transfer characteristics in corrugated channel.
Energy Procedia 14:1566–1573
10. Kanaris AG, Mouza AA, Paras SV (2005) Flow and heat transfer
in narrow channels with corrugated walls a CFD code applica-
tion. Chem Eng Res Des 83(A5):460–468
11. Pehlivan H (2013) Experimental investigation of convection heat
transfer inconverging–diverging wall channels. Int J Heat Mass
Transf 66:128–138
12. Oosthuizen PH, Nayler D (1999) An introduction to convective
heat transfer analysis. Mc-Graw-Hill, New York
13. Versteeg HK, Malalasekera W (1995) Computational fluid
dynamics. Longman Group, New York
14. Launder BE, Spalding DB (1974) The numerical computation of
turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 3:269–289
15. FLUENT 6.3 User’s guide (2006) Fluent Inc., USA
16. Incropera FP, Dewitt DP (2002) Fundamentals of heat and mass
transfer, 5th edn. Wiley, London
17. Naphon P (2007) Laminar convective heat transfer and pressure
drop in the corrugated channels. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf
34:62–71
18. Naphon P (2008) Effect of corrugated plates in an in-phase
arrangement on the heat transfer and flow developments. Int J
Heat Mass Transf 51:3963–3971
19. Zhang J, Kundu J, Manglik RM (2004) Effect of fin waviness and
spacing on the lateral vortex structure and laminar heat transfer in
wavy-plate-fin cores. Int J Heat Mass Transf 47:1719–1730
20. Yuan Z, Tao W, Wang Q (1998) Numerical prediction for lam-
inar forced convection heat transfer in parallel-plate channels
with streamwise-periodic rod disturbances. Int J Numer Methods
Fluids 28:1371–1387
21. Shah RK, London AL (1978) Laminar flow forced convection in
ducts. In: Thomas J, Irvine F, Hartnett JP (eds) Advances in heat
transfer. Academic Press, New York
22. Naphon P (2009) Effect of wavy plate geometry configurations
on the temperature and flow distributions. Int Commun Heat
Mass Transf 36:942–946
Heat Mass Transfer
123