Contributions to the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron ...Contributions to the ATLAS experiment...
Transcript of Contributions to the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron ...Contributions to the ATLAS experiment...
Contributions to the ATLAS experiment
at the Large Hadron Collider LHC
• FPA2009-13234-C04-01 CONTRIBUCIONES AL EXPERIMENTO ATLAS EN EL COLISIONADOR
HADRONICO LHC
M. Carmen García García
• FPA2009-13234-C04-02 PARTICIPACION EN LA INSTALACION DEL SISTEMA ROD Y EN EL
PROGRAMA DE R&D PARA LA FASE II DE UPGRADE DEL EXPERIMENTO TILECAL DEL CERN
Vicente González Millán
• FPA2009-13234-C04-03 CONTRIBUCIONES AL CALORIMETRO HADRONICO TILECAL DE ATLAS
Juan Antonio Valls Ferrer
• FPA2009-13234-C04-04 CONTRIBUCION AL UPGRADE DEL EXPERIMENTO ATLAS DEL SUPER
COLISIONADOR HADRONICO S-LHC
Miguel Ullán Comes
Page 2
Outlook
Main features of the project.
Personnel.
The Project at IFIC and CNM-IMB.
The Project at IFIC and DSDC group.
Page 3
Previous background
The group has its origins in the DELPHI experiment (more than 320 publications)
Page 4
Previous background
Devoted to construction of the
SCT, it assembly, integration in
ATLAS and commissioning.
Projects:
AEN96-1661-C03 (1996),
AEN97-1712-C02 (1997-2000)
FPA2000-1560-C02 (2001-2003)
FPA2003-03878-C02 (2003-2006)
FPA2006-13238-C02 (2006-2009)
In coordination between IFIC and
CNM-IMB
Devoted to the construction,
installation and commissioning of
the TiCal
Projects:
AEN96-1661-C03 (1997-1998)
AEN97-1739 (1998-2001)
FPA-2000- 1579-C02 (2001-2003)
FPA-2003-09220-C02 (2003-2006)
FPA-2006-12672-C02 (2006-2009)
In coordination between IFIC and
DSDC group of the Department of
Electronic Engineering of the
U.Valencia
The group has its origins in the DELPHI experiment (more than 320 publications)
Page 5
Previous background
Devoted to construction of the
SCT, it assembly, integration in
ATLAS and commissioning.
Projects:
AEN96-1661-C03 (1996),
AEN97-1712-C02 (1997-2000)
FPA2000-1560-C02 (2001-2003)
FPA2003-03878-C02 (2003-2006)
FPA2006-13238-C02 (2006-2009)
In coordination between IFIC and
IMB-CNM
Devoted to the construction,
installation and commossioning of
the TiCal
Projects:
AEN96-1661-C03 (1997-1998)
AEN97-1739 (1998-2001)
FPA-2000- 1579-C02 (2001-2003)
FPA-2003-09220-C02 (2003-2006)
FPA-2006-12672-C02 (2006-2009)
In coordination between IFIC and
DSDC group of the Department of
Electronic Engineering of the
U.Valencia
And, FPA2006-3081 (2006-2009) to organize the analysis activities at IFIC.
The group has its origins in the DELPHI experiment (more than 320 publications)
Page 6
Main goal:
Complete the commissioning of the SCT/ID detectors and TiCal detector.
Participate in the operation and maintenance of the SCT/ID and TiCal detector,
with especial emphasis in the Inner detector alignment and hadronic energy
calibration.
Exploit the Atlas full potential for physics studies and discoveries, in particular:
Study of top physic: standard (mass, cross-section, final -and multi-jet final state, etc)
and exotic final states (little and twin-Higgs, Randall Sundrum models, excited top).
Search for Supersymmetry (mainly with R-parity violation) and
Search for Higgs bosons.
Participate in the R&D program for ATLAS upgrade:
Design a new tracker with the aim to have the TRD ready for end 2011.
Design of the ROD system prototype adapted to the requirements for the phase II of the
R&D upgrade program of the LHC experiment
Page 7
PersonnelSCT IFIC Group TiCal IFIC Group IMB-CNM Group DSDC Group
FPA2009-13234-C04-01 FPA2009-13234-C04-03 FPA2009-13234-C04-04 FPA2009-13234-C04-02C. García
Staff
(8)
J. A. Valls Staff
(4)
M. UllánStaff (2)
V. González
Staff (3)C. Lacasta A. Ferrer M. Lozano E. Sanchis,
S. Martí E. Higón R. Mas
Engin. (2)J. Torres
J. Fuster Mª V. Castillo J. Sánchez M. Sáez Stud. (1)J. Mª López
Engin (2)C. Guardiola
Stud. (2)M. J. Costa
R. Ros A. Valero S. Díez
S. Cabrera Y. Hernández
Stud.
(4)
S. Gonzalez de la Hoz E. Valladolid
V. Mitsou (RyC) Postd.
(3)
A. Ruiz
M. Vos (RyC) C. Solans
A. Wildauer
J. Bernabeu
Engin.
(4)
Scientific personel from other intitutions
F. J. Sánchez B. Mellado
R. Marco J. Proudfoot
C. Blanch E. Fullana
C. Escobar
Stud.
(9)
B.Salvachúa
M. Miñano C. Cuenca
M. T. Perez J. Poveda
M. Moreno Llacer
A. Irles
V. Lacuesta
R. Moles
E. Torró
U. Soldevila
IFIC Technical Support
D. Santoyo (Tec.Medio)
J. V. Civera (Tec.Medio )
F. Gónzalez (Oficial Lab. )
J. Nacher (Tec.Medio)
R. Carrasco (Tec.Medio)
R. Rodríguez (Tec.Lab)
EDP (FTE) 21,5 10 5 3
Page 8
PersonnelSCT IFIC Group TiCal IFIC Group IMB-CNM Group DSDC Group
FPA2009-13234-C04-01 FPA2009-13234-C04-03 FPA2009-13234-C04-04 FPA2009-13234-C04-02C. García
Staff
(8)
J. A. Valls Staff
(4)
M. UllánStaff (2)
V. González
Staff (3)C. Lacasta A. Ferrer M. Lozano E. Sanchis,
S. Martí E. Higón R. MasEngin. (2)
J. Torres
J. Fuster Mª V. Castillo J. Sánchez M. Sáez Stud. (1)J. Mª López
Engin (2)C. Guardiola
Stud. (2)M. J. Costa
R. Ros A. Valero S. Díez
S. Cabrera Y. Hernández
Stud.
(4)
S. Gonzalez de la Hoz E. Valladolid
V. Mitsou (RyC) Postd.
(3)
A. Ruiz
M. Vos (RyC) C. Solans
A. Wildauer
J. Bernabeu
Engin.
(4)
Scientific personel from other intitutions
F. J. Sánchez B. Mellado
R. Marco J. Proudfoot
C. Blanch E. Fullana
C. Escobar
Stud.
(9)
B.Salvachúa
M. Miñano C. Cuenca
M. T. Perez J. Poveda
M. Moreno Llacer
A. Irles
V. Lacuesta
R. Moles
E. Torró
U. Soldevila
IFIC Technical Support
D. Santoyo (Tec.Medio)
J. V. Civera (Tec.Medio )
F. Gónzalez (Oficial Lab. )
J. Nacher (Tec.Medio)
R. Carrasco (Tec.Medio)
R. Rodríguez (Tec.Lab)
EDP (FTE) 21,5 10 5 3
EDP = 39,5
Staff 17
Postdoc 3
Engineer 8
Students 16
Page 9
Project organization
Data analysis Analysis facility Infrastructure
SCT/ID (CG)
TiCal(JAV)
TiCalupgrade
(VG)
ID upgrade(MU)
Page 10
Project organization
CB-Atlas Valencia• Antonio Ferrer, Carmen García, Juan A. Valls, Emilio
Higón, Juan Fuster, Eduardo Ros and J. Salt (Tier-2)
Data analysis Analysis facility Infrastructure
SCT/ID (CG)
TiCal(JAV)
TiCalupgrade
(VG)
ID upgrade(MU)
Page 11
Summary of publications (update end 2008)
(During the design, construction and installation of ATLAS)
Summary of publications of the groups Articles by subjets
ATLAS (SCT/ID, TiCal…) 29
SLHC: Inner Detector upgrade and sensor development 23
CNM-IMB technologies 35
IFIC Application of silicon technologies 16
TOTAL ARTICLES 103
Communication to conferences by subjets
ATLAS (SCT/ID, TiCal…) 109
SLHC: Inner Detector upgrade and sensor development 41
CNM-IMB technologies 23
IFIC Application of silicon technologies 44
TOTAL COMUNICATONS 227
Proposals and Technical reports 12
ATLAS Internal notes 59
Page 12
Summary of publications (till end 2008)(During the design, construction and installation of ATLAS)
Summary of publications of the groups Articles by subjets
ATLAS (SCT/ID, TiCal…) 29
SLHC: Inner Detector upgrade and sensor development 23
CNM-IMB technologies 35
IFIC Application of silicon technologies 16
TOTAL ARTICLES 103
Communication to conferences by subjets
ATLAS (SCT/ID, TiCal…) 109
SLHC: Inner Detector upgrade and sensor development 41
CNM-IMB technologies 23
IFIC Application of silicon technologies 44
TOTAL COMUNICATONS 227
Proposals and Technical reports 12
ATLAS Internal notes 59
The project is a large venture What can we achieve?.....
Increase our efficiency and impact in the ATLAS studies.
Optimize the resources .
Use our experience in the construction of ATLAS (SCT &TiCal) to
make a big impact in the R&D for the ATLAS upgrade.
SCT/ID group
C. García and M. Ullán
• FPA2009-13234-C04-01 CONTRIBUCIONES AL EXPERIMENTO ATLAS EN EL COLISIONADOR
HADRONICO LHC
M. Carmen García García
• FPA2009-13234-C04-04 CONTRIBUCION AL UPGRADE DEL EXPERIMENTO ATLAS DEL SUPER
COLISIONADOR HADRONICO S-LHC
Miguel Ullán Comes
Page 14
Outlook
Achievements of previous projects.
ID Commissioning.
ID Alignment.
Physics studies.
R&D for ID upgrade.
Budget requested.
Conclusions and final remarks.
Project lines
Page 15
ATLAS Inner Tracker
INNER TRACKER
Page 16
Contributions to SCT: IFIC and CNM-IMB activities
Page 17
Contributions to SCT:
Rose Coll.
RD48
IFIC and CNM-IMB activities
Page 18
Contributions to SCT:
Rose Coll.
RD48
IFIC and CNM-IMB activities
Page 19
Contributions to SCT:
IFIC has been responsible for the offline
and data analysis
Rose Coll.
RD48
IFIC and CNM-IMB activities
Page 20
Contributions to SCT: IFIC and CNM-IMB activities
Page 21
221+60 modules with Yield: 93%
C. Lacasta Forward modules coordinador
Contributions to SCT: IFIC and CNM-IMB activities
M. Ullán Fan-in
responsible
Page 22
Contributions to SCT: IFIC and CNM-IMB activities
Mechanic
workshop
Page 23
Contributions to SCT:
J. Bernabeu responsible of ID grounding
IFIC and CNM-IMB activities
Page 24
Contributions to SCT:
RD50 - Radiation hard semiconductor
devices for very high luminosity colliders
P-in-N, N-in-P and N-in-N
Different bulks (FZ,MCZ,Ox…)
Different strip insulations
ALIBAVA: portable readout
system for silicon sensors
Design of the ID end-
caps modules for
ATLAS Upgrade
C. Lacasta coordinator of the End-cap
Tracker activities for the ATLAS upgrade
IFIC and CNM-IMB activities
Page 25
Contributions to SCT:
3D sensors
Pads
Edgeless detectors
RD50 - Radiation hard semiconductor
devices for very high luminosity colliders
P-in-N, N-in-P and N-in-N
Different bulks (FZ,MCZ,Ox…)
Different strip insulations
Page 26
Contributions to SCT:
Test chips Irradiations
Gammas
Neutrons
Protons
Page 27
ID Commissioning
Page 28
ID Commissioning
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
The Combined test beam in 2004 could be considered as the first commissioning phase
LHC
single beam
10-12 Sept
Test beam Cosmics
SR1
Cosmics
pit
Cosmics
pit
First tracks collected by the Inner
Detector at the SR1 assembly area
Shafts
The ID took its first cosmic rays at
SR1 before installation in the pit,
with different detector and magnet
configurations as systems were
ready
In July 2008 ATLAS entered
in a semi-continuous
operation mode to get ready
for the LHC start-up.
Global cosmic run in fall
2008.
Co
mm
issio
nin
g w
ith
sin
gle
be
am
an
d in
tera
ctio
ns
M6 period: First
combined inner
detector - muon
spectrometer
tracks in
ATLAS
Page 29
Contributions to the ID Commissioning
2004 Combined Test Beam
Main Results:
First integration of the SCT in a common ATLAS
DAQ
First reconstruction, alignment , data analysis
and combined performance studies within the
ATLAS software framework..
Data/MC
comparison
for ID
measured
momentum
Inner Detector Commissioning in SR1
Main Results:
First successful combined operation of part of the
as built ID
Verify noise and absence of cross talk from other
systems
First results of tracking performance and
detector efficiencies.SCT efficiency
measured with
cosmic rays data
Main responsibilities of the groupSCT: Installation, DAQ, data quality Pixels & SCT alignment
ID software (detector description, simulation…) ID data analysis
SCT noise from
calibration
Page 30
Contributions to the ID Commissioning
M. J. Costa has been the coordinator of:
Inner Detector offline commissioning (2005-2007)
Overall ATLAS offline commissioning (2007-2008)
Prompt Offline Reconstruction (June 2008 - Feb 2009)
J. Bernabeu detector expert
ATLAS commissioning in the pit
Main results:
Successful integration and operation of the ATLAS software
for both cosmic rays and first LHC single beam data.
Provide first alignment constants for the silicon detectors
Detailed full ID performance studies
First ATLAS combined muon performance studies with
cosmic rays
p in good
agreement with
the energy lost
in the
calorimeters
FUTUR PLANS
Finalize analysis of the data taken in 2008
towards publications ( ID performance studies,
combined muon performance studies, first
physics measurement of N +/ N -)
Analysis of the cosmic rays and first LHC data
taken in 2009.
Commissioning with the first LHC dataA. Wildauer coordinator of ID detector performance
Page 31
ID alignment
Page 32
ID Alignment
To achieve the ATLAS physics goals
High accuracy alignment is required
precision in rΦ < 10 μm
Ultimate precision reached with track-based alignment algorithms!!!
Mixture of 3 technologies: pixels, microstrips and transition radiation.
(5832 silicon modules and 34992 DoFs)
Several approaches implemented within the ATLAS software framework
Methods for silicon system
GlobalChi2 LocalChi2 Robust
• In-plane residuals use to build
the chi2 to minimise: 6 DoF
per module (matrix 35k x 35k)
• Correlations managed → small
number of iterations
• Inversion of small 6x6 matrix
(one per module)
• Large number of iterations to
get compensate the lack of
correlations
Calculates alignment
corrections from centering track
residual and overlap residual
distributions in an iterative way
Page 33
ID Alignment
To achieve the ATLAS physics goals
High accuracy alignment is required
precision in rΦ < 10 μm
Ultimate precision reached with track-based alignment algorithms!!!
Mixture of 3 technologies: pixels, microstrips and transition radiation.
(5832 silicon modules and 34992 DoFs)
Several approaches implemented within the ATLAS software framework
Methods for silicon system
GlobalChi2 LocalChi2 Robust
• In-plane residuals use to build
the chi2 to minimise: 6 DoF
per module (matrix 35k x 35k)
• Correlations managed → small
number of iterations
• Inversion of small 6x6 matrix
(one per module)
• Large number of iterations to
get compensate the lack of
correlations
Calculates alignment
corrections from centering track
residual and overlap residual
distributions in an iterative way
Oxford-IFIC collaboration
Page 34
ID Alignment achievements
CSC (“Computing System Commissioning”)
The ATLAS CSC served to validate the ATLAS ID Alignment
algorithms with large MC samples
During the CSC the ID alignment strategy was settle level by level
From big structures (few DoFs)
Barrel layers and end caps disks (hundreds of DoFs)
To modules (35K DoFs) Results of the Globalχ2 method during the CSC
were used in the ATLAS detector paper
Page 35
ID Alignment achievements
The 2008 ATLAS FDR (Full Dress
Rehearsals) main purpose was an
evaluation of different data streaming for
physics analysis and calibration
The calibration and alignment was run
like in real data taking with a 24 hours
loop
Our alignment constants were used for
the official production
During the 2008 ATLAS FDRs the
alignment scheme was
implemented, tested and validated.
Page 36
ID Alignment achievements
During the fall of 2008, ATLAS collected several
millions of real cosmic ray tracks.
Our first set of alignment constants with the Globalχ2
was validated and ready to reconstruct the first LHC
collisions.
The experience with the real data helped to identify
new alignment levels
Pixel half shells
Pixel and SCT ladders
Our Globalχ2 set of constants are used for the
Official ATLAS cosmic data reprocessing
By the Cosmic analysis group
S. Martí deputy convener
of the ID alignment
A. Wildauer will integrate
all new alignment
software (including TRT)
Validation performed with track
splitting in upper and lower
segment and check the matching
Page 37
ID Alignment future activities
Activities using cosmic data: Continue the studies
with cosmic data
Activities using simulated data:
Development and validation of the alignment algorithm.
Study of systematic deformations (“Weak Modes”)
effects on physics observables.
Evaluation of stream calibration
Improvement of Global 2 algorithm: Assembly
survey, constraints on track parameters, constraints
on event observables, implement the FSI
information in the scheme.
Test of the alignment loop with real collision data.
It is very challenging to feed back the alignment
constants within 24 hours after data taking.
Alignment at the Tier2 centres: a more refined
alignment will use the physics channels streams and
must integrate all the constraints.
Weak Mode
Page 38
Physics studies
Page 39
IFIC group is participating and has interests in the following areas of
data analysis:
Top physics:
Standard model (mass, cross-section, final - and multi-jet final
states, etc..),
Exotic final states (little and twin-Higgs, Randall.Sundrum models,
excited top),
Supersymmetry searches (mainly R-parity violation models),
Searches for Higgs boson (H W(*)W(*) 2l2ν, H , H ).
Page 40
Top Physic: Standard Model
Top quark mass
LHC will be a top factory: 8 x 105 ttbar pairs with ℒ= 1 fb-1 gro@ 14 TeV
Goal: Determination of the top quark mass in the semi-
leptonic (e, ) channel using a global 2 kinematic fit.
It is a Kinematic fit where an explicit reconstruction of the
event topology is performed (assuming a particle decay model) → 2 terms
Global 2 advantages:
1st: Chi2 minimization wrt W parameters
2nd: Chi2 minimization wrt top parameters
including the previous minimization as a nested fit.
A in-situ calibration is done: Efi = αi Ei
m
(i represents the light jets, the b-jets or lepton)
This allows to study the Jet Energy Scale (JES)
for light quarks, b quarks and leptons separately.
Page 41
Top Physic: Standard Model
Top physics studies in channels with hadronic tau decays
tt-bar di-lepton channel with a hadronic tau decay:
ttbar -> W(->e/ + )b W(-> + )b
Result for CSC are published for 14 TeV.
Under going for 10 TeV
Semileptonic tt-bar channel:
ttbar->W(-> + )b W(qq')b
Polarization measurements using the top quark
decay chain: ttbar->W(->e/ + )b and ttbar->W(-> + )b
Study of the observable cos * ( * angle between the decay lepton and the top quark in
the reference frame of the W at rest in the decay chain: ttbar->W(->l+ )b
In collaboration with Portugal (cooperation projects PORT2008-01, GVPRE/2008/062)
Combined b-tagging weights using impact
parameter and secondary vertex
information for the first two leading Et jets
Page 42
Top Physic: Searches for New Physics and Exotics
New physics searches with 3rd generation quarks
Many of the SM extensions predict many final states with heavy
quarks. Top quark can be produced with a large transverse
momentum.
The experimental reconstruction and selection of the events with
high Pt top and bottom quarks represents a serious challenge.
During the recent years the ATLAS IFIC group has worked on
this topic (high Pt b-tagging).
The IFIC group has participated in many prospective analyses.
Z'→ ZH and Z → l+l- plus H → bb.
W' → tb and t → bW.
Twing Higgs model:
W'->Tb, where T is a heavy partner of the top quark.
W'-> where both are scalars.
Randall-Sundrum model: G->ttbar, being G an excited gluon.
E. Ros is convener of
the Exotic Physics
group since 2007
Page 43
Top Physic: Searches for New Physics and Exotics
Hadronic top-quark pair production in association with a hard jet(cross sections of around 175-53 pb)
Deviations from the SM prediction could be a signal for new physics (excited top)
This topology is important as background for the Higgs boson searches via weak-vector-
boson fusion. M. Vos will be coordinator of the Exotics/Jet+X subgroup
Page 44
Top Physic: Searches for New Physics and Exotics
Hadronic top-quark pair production in association with a hard jet(cross sections of around 175-53 pb)
Deviations from the SM prediction could be a signal for new physics (excited top)
This topology is important as background for the Higgs boson searches via weak-vector-
boson fusion.
Search of a chromoelectric dipole moment of the top quarkOne of the properties of the top quark that would reveal new physics would be the
presence of an electric dipole moment in the gluonic (chromoelectric dipole moment,
CEDM), electromagnetic or Z mediated weak interactions.
CEDM ≠0 violation P and T
In SM, a violation of T (and equivalently of CP) change of flavour
No change of flavour in ttbar production at LHC the presence of a CEDM would mean
the presence of new physics.
Project in collaboration with the IFIC theoretical department
M. Vos will be coordinator of the Exotics/Jet+X subgroup
Page 45
Search for Supersimmetry with R-Parity violation
R-parity violation (RPV) → LSP is not stable → no high missing energy signature
The model parameters are largely constrained by neutrino experiments (Δmatm
2, Δmsol2, tan2θatm, tan2θsol)
BRs of LSP decays sensitive to neutrino mixing, e.g.:
Final states studied:
– two jets and one muon or τ-lepton
– LSP lifetime → secondary vetrex tagging
Feasible with LHC first data (200 pb-1), applying very
simple cuts on muons, jets and Meff with high S/B ratio
Collaboration with the IFIC theoretical department
)W~(
)W~(tan
0
1
0
12
BR
BRatm
Bilinear terms → mixing between neutrinos-neutralinos → neutrino masses
V. Mitsou: organiser of prompt RPV analyses
within the ATLAS collaboration
Page 46
Analysis Facility
Disk space
An average analysis ~40 TB for DPD
data format.
IFIC we should be dealing with at least
three “average analyses” , we need of
about 120 TB
= 90 K€
CPU
Assuming that 8 cores per user ( around
20 users) =160 cores are needed (
32 are already installed (thanks to the
additional funding achievents)
A PC with 8 cores and 16 GB = 3.500 €
= 56 K €
• This infrastructure will be used by all
analysis groups @ IFIC.
• The cost of this infrastructure will be
cover by the IFIC projects
• Each group will contribute to 50% of
the infrastructure expenses (Based on ATLAS estimations)
Page 47
ID upgrade
Page 48
ID upgrade
LHC luminosity evolution schedule to work to
Milestone Date Straw Man & options fixed Dec 2006
R&D towards inner detector conceptual design 2007-2010
Technical Proposal April 2011
Initial MoU and Costing April 2011
Inner Tracker TDR End 2011
Production readiness reviews and ramp up
production2013
New Insertable B-layer End 2013
Procure parts, Component assembly 2013 - 2015
Surface assembly September 2015 - end 2016
Stop LHC Sep 2017
Remove old detectors, install new Oct 2017- Dec 2018
Commission new detectors Jan 2019 - Mar 2019
Take data April 2019
“Super-LHC”: 1034 → 1035 cm-2 s-1
(before the LHC accident on 19th September)
• The current SCT was design for 740 fb-1
• New detector needs to cope with higher (x10) radiation levels and
occupancies.
• Higher granularity required to maintain the occupancy (more readout
channels, power consumption and services).
• Fit in the actual ID volume.
The sLHC planning as agreed at the LHCC meeting,
allowing for delays announced after the LHC accident in
September 2008. Last updated 21 April 2009.
The exact physics opportunities are difficult to predict. It depends very
much on what the LHC will find (extend the mass reached by 20-30%)
Page 49
ID upgrade
CURRENT PROPOSALS
Short name Title Principle contacts Status (14/11/08)
Staves Development and Integration of Modular Assemblies with
Reduced Services for the ATLAS Silicon Strip Tracking
Layers
C. Haber, M. Gilchriese Approved by EB
ABCNext Proposal to develop ABC-Next, a readout ASIC for the S-
ATLAS Silicon Tracker Module Design
F. Anghinolfi, W.
Dabrowski
Approved by EB
n-in-p sensors Development of non-inverting Silicon strip detectors for
the ATLAS ID upgrade
Hartmut Sadrozinski Approved by EB
SiGe chips Evaluation of Silicon-Germanium (SiGe) Bipolar
Technologies for Use in an Upgraded ATLAS Detector
Alex Grillo, S. Rescia Approved by EB
3D Sensors Development, Testing, and Industrialization of 3D Active-
Edge Silicon Radiation Sensors with Extreme Radiation
Hardness: Results, Plans
Sherwood Parker now
Cinzia Da Via
Approved by EB
Modules Research towards the Module and Services Structure
Design for the ATLAS Inner Tracker at the Super LHC
Nobu Unno Approved by EB
Powering Research and Development of power distribution schemes
for the ATLAS Silicon Tracker Upgrade
Marc Weber Approved by EB
Tile-Electronics Tile Calorimeter Electronics for the sLHC C. Bohm EoI Received
Table 3: List of R&D project approved by the ATLAS Upgrade steering group. in which our group is participating.
ATLAS TCM. Nessi
Project OfficeD. Lissauer
Dep. N. Hessey
Review OfficeM. Tyndel
Working Groups
ThermalManagementG. Viehhauser
ElectronicsP. Farthouat
Module IntegrationP. Allport
LayoutN. Hessey
B-layerreplacement
G. Darbo
Engineering & IntegrationA. Catinaccio
Silicon SensorsNobu Unno
RadiationV. Hedberg
(Acting)
Links
MachineP. Grafstrom
Muon systemS. Palestini
Lar systemF. Lanni
TDAQS. Tapprogge
IFIC
IFIC
IFIC
IFIC
IFIC
IFIC
USGN. Hessey
Dep. D. Lissauer
EB
R&D projects IFIC
CURRENT PROPOSALS
Short name Title Status (14/11/08)
Staves Development and Integration of Modular Assemblies with Reduced
Services for the ATLAS Silicon Strip Tracking Layers Approved by EB
ABCNext Proposal to develop ABC-Next, a readout ASIC for the S-ATLAS
Silicon Tracker Module Design Approved by EB
n-in-p sensors Development of non-inverting Silicon strip detectors for the ATLAS
ID upgrade Approved by EB
SiGe chips Evaluation of Silicon-Germanium (SiGe) Bipolar Technologies for
Use in an Upgraded ATLAS Detector Approved by EB
Modules Research towards the Module and Services Structure Design for the
ATLAS Inner Tracker at the Super LHC Approved by EB
Powering Research and Development of power distribution schemes for the
ATLAS Silicon Tracker Upgrade Approved by EB
Our group has demonstrated
international leadership in
many aspects of the current
SCT:
module design and
production,
development of radiation
resistant silicon sensors
evaluation of the current
readout technology.
Read-out electronics
Silicon sensors
Super-modules
C. Lacasta
Page 50
ID upgrade: Super-modules
CO2 cooling
pipe
First IFIC-CNM
prototype
Powering and readout
are grouped for several
modules and integrated
in a petal (end-cap):
• 9 sensors/side
• 120 chips/side
• Populate the prototype with
dummy components (thermal
and mechanic properties)
• Develop the power supply
system
• Design the hybrids (Freiburg)
End-cap
mechanical
support ( collaboration
with NIKHEF)
(38<R<95cm)
Page 51
ID upgrade: Silicon sensors
CNM-IMB: Design and fabrication of pad, “baby”,
and full “ATLAS-like” strip detectors
P+
P
N+
P-spray (p+)
MetalPolysilicon
Oxide
+++++
Oxide
charge
Electron inversion layer
-----------
P-type det. for ATLAS Upgrade
Simulation, characterization, irradiation
• CNM-IMB, Micron and HPK sensors have been
studied in the frame work of RD50 and ATLAS
• AliBava System will be use to built a telescope for
test beam studies
Protons
Neutrons
Page 52
ID upgrade: Read-out electronics
Evaluate radiation hardness of advanced SiGe
technologies
Prove power savings with speed and gain
Different technologies being evaluated
IBM: 8HP, 8WL (Baseline)
IHP: SG25H1, SGB25VD, SG25H3 (Backup)
3 Full radiation test chips developed
Irradiation studies: gammas (CIEMAT), neutrons
(TRIGA , Ljubljana) and protons (PS, CERN)
All technologies so far have shown values of acceptable
gain and power consumption at the radiation levels
expected in the S-LHC
Technologies suitable for ATLAS Upgrade
1st IHP
test chip
1st IBM
test chip
2nd IHP
test chip
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1 10 100 1000Dose (Mrad(Si))
No
rma
lize
d c
urr
en
t g
ain
(be
taf/b
eta
0)
SG25H1
SG25H3
SGB25VD
Gammas
Page 53
Budget
Page 54
SCT-IFIC Budget:Travels
Per year (€) TOTAL (€)
ATLAS weeks (3 trips x 4persons) 12.000 36.000
ID general weeks (4 trips x 4 persons) 16.000 48.000
ID software meetings (5 trips X 3
persons)
15.000 45.000
Steering meeting (9 meetings x 1
persons)
4.500 13.500
Alignment and Commissioning
coordination
15.000 45.000
Data analysis coordination 15.000 45.000
ATLAS Upgrade Weeks (2
tripsx4persons)
8.000 24.000
Technical assistance to detector
maintenance and SR1 test stand
10.000 30.000
RD50 Meetings (3tripx3persons) 9.000 27.000
Analysis coordination 10.000 30.000
6 Conferences 12.000 36.000
4 Schools 4.000 12.000
Coordination R&D modules (5 trips x 2
persons)
10.000 30.000
Coordination with CNM 5.000 15.000
Irradiations 8.000 24.000
TOTAL 153.500 460.500
Personnel2010 (€) 2011 (€) 2012 (€)
Hired scientist (alignment) 26.000 26.000 26.000
Hired scientist (ID upgrade) 26.000 26.000 26.000
Mechanical Engineer 35.000 35.000 35.000
Electronic Engineer 35.000 35.000
TOTAL 87.000 122.000 122.000
TOTAL 331.000
1 person x 1 week= 1000 €
(Very Tightened : base on
actual current expenses)
Just to keep at least
the same team
Page 55
Analysis facility Equipment (€)
Disk
Disk space for Tier-3 users
40TB for DPD data format, three analysis per year
= 120TB 45.000
CPU for PROOF farm8 cores per user and 20 user = 160 cores
(32 already installed)
1 PC with 8 cores and 16 GB = 3500€
28.000
Desktops and notebooks For new comers (physicists and technicians) 15.000
TOTAL 88.000
Quotas, M&O and others Fungible (€) Total (€)
ID and SCT M&O contribution 60.000 60.000
Contribution to detector operation and maintenance according
with ID and SCT sharing, 4FTE (base at CERN 3FTEs, 2
seniors and 1 student)
80000
(per year)240.000
Participation on RD50 projects, common funds 12.000 12.000
EUROPRACTICE 1000x3 Quota 3.000 3.000
ASIC development and prototype 20.000 20.000
Hybrid development and prototype 20.000 20.000
Sensors development and prototype 40000 40000
Printing and bibliography 10.000 10.000
Conference fees 6.000 6.000
Unexpected expenses 15.000 15.000
Insurance and shipping 15.000 15.000
TOTAL 441.000 441.000
SCT-IFIC Budget:
Page 56
SCT-IFIC Budget:Sensor development for
SLHC
Equipment (€) Fungible (€) Total (€)
Update setup
Mechanic Support 5000 5000
2 stages with 5 um precision 10000 10000
Power supplies 12000 12000
Radioactive sources
(Multipeak, beta)
12000 12000
PMs 3000 3000
Power supply for PMs 3000 3000
NIM modules (discrim.,
coinc...)
5000 5000
Ortec NIM amplifier 3000 3000
PC for data adquisition 3000 3000
Cooling system 5000 5000 10000
Substitution of obsolete
equipment
10000 10000
Cables, connector, boxes,
etc.
5000
ALIBAVA Update (Telescope)
Software Licenses 3000 3000
Test FPGA x6 6000 6000
Production FPGA x6 6000 6000
Beetle Chip x100 3000 3000
Board production x50 5000 5000
Silicon sensors 10000 10000
Telescope mechanics 15000 15000
TOTAL 59.000 70.000 129.000
Module Design and
Prototyping
Equipment (€) Fungible (€) Total (€)
CO2 cooling plant 50.000 40.000
Climate chamber 100x40x40 cm 16.000 16.000
Large anti-vibration granite table 15.000 15.000
Autoclave for carbon fibre foil lamination
and corresponding equipment for
machining carbon foams, honeycomb, etc.
15.000 10.000 25.000
Material and components to build petal
prototypes
30.000 30.000
Various components to populate the petal
prototypes
25.000 25.000
Voltage supplies for heaters in thermal
test
10.000 5.000 15.000
Setup for electrical characterization of the
petal
20.000 20.000
Jigs for bonding 20.000
Software for FEA (Finite Element
Analysis) simulation and computer
3.000 10.000
TOTAL 129.000 100.000 219.000
Update setup for SLHC
electronics studies
Equipment
(€)
Fungible (€) Total (€)
Micro probes and manipulators 12000
Function/Pulse Generator 20000
Power Supply 4500
Acquisition card 8000
Computer to drive the acquisition 3000
Faraday cage 2000
Radioactive source 6000
Lab. Misc. Items: cables, resistors,
capacitors, connectors, board
design,…
15000
TOTAL 27.500 23.000 50.500
Page 57
CNM-IMB Budget:
Personnel 148 .415 €
1 Scientific contract (graduated) x 3 years 74 208 €
1 Scientific contract (graduated) x 3 years 74 208 €
•1 Student for the setup, measurements,
and simulations in the radiation hardness
studies of the readout electronics and
power electronics.
•Replacement for current student
•1 Student for the fabrication and tests of
the silicon radiation detectors.
•Replacement for current student
•Support technician dedicated to the
general maintenance and use of lab.
Equipment 95 .500 €
Environmental control system 7 000 €
Keithley 2602 (2 SMUs) 13 000 €
PC instrument control 1 500 €
Switching matrix 24 000 €
Electronic Voltage Stabilizer 5 000 €
Small size furnace 4 000 €
X ray irradiation system 40 000 €
Bibliographic material 1 000 €
•X-ray irradiation system for ionization
damage tests (cofinanced)
•Equipment for laboratory (furnace, SAI,
environmental control system)
•Equipment for automatic test setup (PC,
Switching matrix, Keythley)
•Library material
Page 58
CNM-IMB Budget:Consumables 128 .000 €
micromanipulators and test probes 5 000 €
Radiation sources 3 000 €
High resistivity wafers 8 000 €
Adquisition cards 5 000 €
Probe cards 2 000 €
Probe card adaptor for probe table 2 000 €
Setup material for experiments,
irradiations, and tests (cables, boards,
connectors, mechanics, …)
12 000 €
Masks for detectors 10 000 €
Fabrication of detectors and dummies 18 000 €
Fabrication of prototype electronics 20 000 €
Irradiations 35 000 €
Extension of radioactive facility to X-rays 5 000 €
Mantenance of radiation facility and
laboratory
3 000 €
Radioactive facility and laboratory
Detectors and dummies fabrication (wafers + processing)
FE Electronics prototype fabrication
Gamma irradiations
Material for automatic test setup
Various 19 .500 €
Quotes RD50 5 000 €
Shipments, customs, … 1 500 €
Organization of meetings, workshops and
collaborations3 000 €
Technical courses 10 000 €
RD50 fees
Organization of workshops and Collaboration meetings
Technical courses
Shipments, customs, …
Page 59
CNM-IMB Budget: Travel 89 900 €
3 years x 2 meetings electronics upgrade x 2p 10 800 €
3 years x 2 ATLAS Upgrade weeks x 2p 10 800 €
3 years x 2 meetings RD50 x 1p 6 000 €
3 years x 1 workshop detectores strip - RD50
x 1p2 700 €
3 years x 2 international conf. x 1p 18 000 €
3 years x 2 national conf. x 1p 6 000 €
3 years x 1 coordinationn meeting SCIPP x 1p 6 000 €
3 years x 1 coordination meeting x 1p 3 600 €
3 years x 1 coordination meeting x group 3 000 €
3 years x 2 meetings managment of
collaborations x 1p6 000 €
Stays CERN x 1p (irrads, shifts, test beam) 7 000 €
Irradiations 8 000 €
Trips for special external measurements 2 000 €
Collaboration meetings
Workshops and conferences
Coordination with collaborators
Irradiations, special measurements, CERN shifts/test beams/irradiations
IFIC CNM-IMB
EDPs 21,5 5
Personnel 371.000 188.416
Budget (Dirc.) 1.775.000 521.316
Total Budget 2.147.750 630.792
Page 60
Some of the positions of responsibility inside the ATLAS collaboration
Coordination positions
Coordinator of the electrical design of the module: C. Lacasta
End-cap module production coordinator: C Lacasta.
Responsable of fan-in fabrication and distribution: M. Ullán
Responsible of ID grounding: J. Bernabeu.
ID offline commissioning coordinator: M.J.Costa
ATLAS offline commissioning coordinator: M.J.Costa
ATLAS Prompt offline reconstruction coordinator: M.J.Costa
ID alignment deputy convenor: S. Martí.
Convener ID offline and performance: A. Wildauer.
Convener of the Exotic Searches: E. Ros. Member of committees
SCT Steering Group: J. Fuster, C. García and C. Lacasta
ID software Steering Group: M.J.Costa, S. Martí.
ATLAS Software Performance Management Board: M.J.Costa
ATLAS run coordination group: M.J.Costa
Data Preparation Coordination group: M.J.Costa
SCT Conference Speakers & Publications committee : J Fuster
Tracker Upgrade Project Office: C. Lacasta
Page 61
Conclusions and final remarks
ATLAS will open a new physics frontier.
We can contribute with our previous experience and knowledge
and have a big impact in the data analysis.
Moreover, our experience in the design and construction of the
SCT will allow us to lead some aspects of the design of the new
ATLAS Tracker.
IFIC and CNM-IMB have collaborated for more than 12 years,
and this collaboration has been very productive as the results of
our research shows.
Finally, the data analysis in ATLAS and the R&D for the new
ATLAS tracker offer a great opportunity for new students.
Page 62
SCT-IFIC Budget:Sensor development for
SLHC
Equipment (€) Fungible (€) Total (€)
Update setup
Mechanic Support 5000 5000
2 stages with 5 um precision 10000 10000
Power supplies 12000 12000
Radioactive sources
(Multipeak, beta)
12000 12000
PMs 3000 3000
Power supply for PMs 3000 3000
NIM modules (discrim.,
coinc...)
5000 5000
Ortec NIM amplifier 3000 3000
PC for data adquisition 3000 3000
Cooling system 5000 5000 10000
Substitution of obsolete
equipment
10000 10000
Cables, connector, boxes,
etc.
5000
ALIBAVA Update (Telescope)
Software Licenses 3000 3000
Test FPGA x6 6000 6000
Production FPGA x6 6000 6000
Beetle Chip x100 3000 3000
Board production x50 5000 5000
Silicon sensors 10000 10000
Telescope mechanics 15000 15000
TOTAL 59.000 70.000 129.000
Module Design and
Prototyping
Equipment (€) Fungible (€) Total (€)
CO2 cooling plant 50.000 40.000
Climate chamber 100x40x40 cm 16.000 16.000
Large anti-vibration granite table 15.000 15.000
Autoclave for carbon fibre foil lamination
and corresponding equipment for
machining carbon foams, honeycomb, etc.
15.000 10.000 25.000
Material and components to build petal
prototypes
30.000 30.000
Various components to populate the petal
prototypes
25.000 25.000
Voltage supplies for heaters in thermal
test
10.000 5.000 15.000
Setup for electrical characterization of the
petal
20.000 20.000
Jigs for bonding 20.000
Software for FEA (Finite Element
Analysis) simulation and computer
3.000 10.000
TOTAL 129.000 100.000 219.000
Update setup for SLHC
electronics studies
Equipment
(€)
Fungible (€) Total (€)
Micro probes and manipulators 12000
Function/Pulse Generator 20000
Power Supply 4500
Acquisition card 8000
Computer to drive the acquisition 3000
Faraday cage 2000
Radioactive source 6000
Lab. Misc. Items: cables, resistors,
capacitors, connectors, board
design,…
15000
TOTAL 27.500 23.000 50.500
Page 63
SCT-IFIC Budget:
TravelsPer year (€) TOTAL (€)
ATLAS Upgrade Weeks (2
tripsx4persons)
8.000 24.000
RD50 Meetings (3tripx3persons) 9.000 27.000
Coordination R&D modules (5 trips x 2
persons)
10.000 30.000
Coordination with CNM 5.000 15.000
Irradiations 8.000 24.000
TOTAL 40.000 120.000
Quotas, M&O and others Fungible (€) Total (€)
Participation on RD50 projects, common funds 12.000 12.000
EUROPRACTICE 1000x3 Quota 3.000 3.000
ASIC development and prototype 20.000 20.000
Hybrid development and prototype 20.000 20.000
Sensors development and prototype 40000 40000
Insurance and shipping 15.000 15.000
TOTAL 110.000 110.000
TOTAL 628.000€ and 6 EDPs
Page 64
ID Alignment
To achieve the ATLAS physics goals, we need...
Don’t degrade resolution of track parameters > 20 %
Systematic error M(W) < 15 MeV/c2
b-tagging efficiency drops by 10 % with a misalignment of O(10 μm), so...
High accuracy alignment is required: precision in rΦ < 10 μm
Ultimate precision reached with track-based alignment algorithms!!!
Mixture of 3 technologies: pixels, microstrips and transition radiation.
(5832 silicon modules and 34992 DoFs)
Several approaches implemented within the ATLAS software framework (Athena).
Methods for silicon system
GlobalChi2 LocalChi2 Robust
• In-plane residuals use to build
the chi2 to minimise: 6 DoF
per module (matrix 35k x 35k)
• Correlations managed → small
number of iterations
• Inversion of small 6x6 matrix
(one per module)
• Large number of iterations to
get compensate the lack of
correlations
Calculates alignment
corrections from centering track
residual and overlap residual
distributions in an iterative way