Contraversies in hypertension management

41
Controversies in Hypertension Management

description

 

Transcript of Contraversies in hypertension management

Page 1: Contraversies in hypertension management

Controversies in Hypertension Management

Page 2: Contraversies in hypertension management

BLOOD PRESSURE

Blood pressure is the force applied against

the walls of the arteries as the heart pumps

blood through the body.

The pressure is determined by the force and

amount of blood pumped and the size and

flexibility of the arteries.

Page 3: Contraversies in hypertension management

ARTERIAL BLOOD PRESSURE

Sphygmomanometry: Indirect BP measurement

MAP = 1/3 (SBP) + 2/3 (DBP) BP = CO x TPR

MAP: Mean Arterial Pressure

SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure

DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure

BP: Blood Pressure

CO: Cardiac Output

TPR: Total Peripheral Resistance

Page 4: Contraversies in hypertension management

ARTERIAL PRESSURE DETERMINANTS

Page 5: Contraversies in hypertension management

HYPERTENSION

Hypertension is a disorder characterized by

chronically high blood pressure.

Page 6: Contraversies in hypertension management

ADULT CLASSIFICATION

Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003;42(6):1206–1252.

Page 7: Contraversies in hypertension management
Page 8: Contraversies in hypertension management

TREATMENT GOALS

Reduce morbidity & mortality

Select drug therapy based on evidence

demonstrating risk reduction

Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003;42(6):1206–1252.

Page 9: Contraversies in hypertension management

2007 AHA RECOMMENDATIONS

More aggressive BP lowering for high risk patients

Rosendorff C, Black HR, Cannon CP, et al. Treatment of hypertension in the prevention and management of ischemic heart disease: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council for High Blood Pressure Research and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation 2007;115(21):2761–2788.

Page 10: Contraversies in hypertension management

CONTROVERSY ISSUES IN MANAGEMENT

BP measurement White coat hypertension

Ambulatory BP or Sphygmomanometer BP measurement?

Reasons behind increasing incidence of hypertension

Possible ways to slow the process Lifestyle changes

Need for overall cardiovascular risk assessment

Major issues in the decision to institute drug therapy The choice of drug

Importance of screening for various identifiable

causes

Page 11: Contraversies in hypertension management

BP MEASUREMENT

White coat hypertension: elevated BP in

clinic followed by normal BP reading at

home

Aggressive treatment of white coat

hypertension is controversial

Patients with white coat hypertension may

have increased CV risk compared to those

without such BP changes

Page 12: Contraversies in hypertension management

OPINION

Classify Hypertension based on average of

> 2 properly measured seated BP

measurements from > 2 clinical

encounters

If systolic & diastolic blood pressure values

give different classifications, classify by

highest category

Page 13: Contraversies in hypertension management

Ambulatory BP measurement or Manual BP measurements using

sphygmomanometer

Ambulatory BP measurements may be

more accurate & better predict target-

organ damage than manual BP

measurements using a sphygmomanometer

in a clinic setting (gold standard)

many patients may be misdiagnosed,

misclassified

poor technique, daily BP variability, white

coat HTN

Validated ambulatory BP monitoring: role in

the routine HTN management unclear

Joseph J. Saseen, April Casselman, et al. Hypertension Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach; www.acesspharmacy.com ,The McGraw-Hill Companies

Page 14: Contraversies in hypertension management

REASONS BEHIND INCREASING INCIDENCE

OF HYPERTENSION Hypertension - most common risk factor for

cardiovascular morbidity and mortality*.

*Ezzati M, Vander Hoorn S, Lawes CM, et al. Rethinking the “diseases of affluence” paradigm: global patterns of nutritional risks in relation to economic development. PloS Med 2005; 2: e133.

Page 15: Contraversies in hypertension management

Three quarters global hypertensive –

developing world.

The inadequacy of current practice :

Too few individuals diagnosed and treated

effectively.

And complexity of the origin of

hypertension, a multifactorial disease*.

Population-wide manoeuvres –

Should be National priority

*Opie L. Heart physiology. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2004.

Page 16: Contraversies in hypertension management

PROBLEMS OF DEVELOPING WORLD:

National priority – HIV, Infectious diseases, drought, etc Restricted health budget

Urbanization –

Page 17: Contraversies in hypertension management

CAN THE PRO-HYPERTENSIVE TRENDS OF URBANISATION BE

MODIFIED?

CUBA MODEL*

Media promotes – Lifestyle changes

Focus on Female obesity more

Well developed Health care system

High Physical activity – Daily use of

bicycles by all*Ordunez-Garcia P, Espinosa-Brito A, Cooper RS. Cardiovascular health in the developing world. Case for prevention: early detection of hypertension in Cuba.

Page 18: Contraversies in hypertension management

WHICH LIFESTYLE CHANGES ARE

EFFECTIVE?Comprehensive lifestyle changes

In a US trial pre-hypertensive and people with

stage 1 hypertension not on drug therapy*

Measures - weight loss, reduced dietary sodium

and alcohol intake, and increased exercise.

Overall, bodyweight fell by 4·9 kg, fitness

improved, urine sodium values fell by 32 mmol per

day, and blood pressure fell by a mean of

3·7/1·7 mm Hg lower than values in the control

group*PREMIER Clinical Trial, Appel LJ, Champagne CM, et al. Effects of comprehensive lifestyle modification on blood pressure control: main results of the PREMIER clinical trial. JAMA 2003; 289: 2083–93.

Page 19: Contraversies in hypertension management

DOES WEIGHT LOSS REDUCE BY BLOOD

PRESSURE? 10 kg weight loss by non-surgical means

sustained for 2 years – Mean fall of 6/4.6

mm Hg in BP*

Reduction in body weight by gastric

bypass with bilio-pancreatic diversion

provide increase fall in BP**.

*Aucott L, Poobalan A, Smith WC, Avenell A, Jung R, Broom J. Effects of weight loss in overweight/obese individuals and long-term hypertension outcomes: a systematic review. Hypertension 2005; 45: 1035–41.**Adami G, Murelli F, Carlini F, Papadia F, Scopinaro N. Long-term effect of biliopancreatic diversion on blood pressure in hypertensive obese patients. Am J Hypertens 2005; 18: 780–84.

Page 20: Contraversies in hypertension management

DO WEIGHT-REDUCING DRUGS REDUCE BLOOD

PRESSURE? Orlistat treatment for 4 years, together with

lifestyle modifications, reduced bodyweight

by 5% and blood pressure by 4·9/2·6 mm

Hg*.

The cannabinoid-1-receptor blocker

Rimonabant, a daily dose of 20 mg reduced

the blood pressure of obese individuals with

hypertension by a mean of 13·1/6·3 mm Hg**.*Torgerson JS, Hauptman J, Boldrin MN, Sjostrom L. Xenical in the prevention of diabetes in obese subjects (XENDOS) study: a randomized study of orlistat as an adjunct to lifestyle changes for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in obese patients. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 155–61.** Despres JP, Golay A, Sjostrom L; Rimonabant in Obesity-Lipids Study Group. Effects of rimonabant on metabolic risk factors in overweight patients with dyslipidemia. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2121–34.

Page 21: Contraversies in hypertension management

Do popular diets help to control blood

pressure?

Low adherence rate problem

Does exercise help reduce blood

pressure?

Exercise with 7% weight loss – Reduce onset of

Diabetes*

How successful is sodium restriction?

80 mmol per day will reduce blood pressure by

about 5/3 mm Hg in individuals with

hypertension**.

*Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention and metformin. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 393.** He FJ, MacGregor GA. Effect of modest salt reduction on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Implications for public health. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16: 761–70.

Page 22: Contraversies in hypertension management

Need for overall cardiovascular risk

assessment Risk increases linearly even in high-normal

ranges in blood pressure* But, individuals’ absolute overall cardiovascular

risk as the criterion for therapy has become obvious**.

*Vasan RS, Larson MG, Leip EP, et al. Impact of high-normal blood pressure on the risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1291–97.**Jackson R, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Milne RJ, Rodgers A. Treatment with drugs to lower blood pressure and blood cholesterol based on an individual’s absolute cardiovascular risk. Lancet 2005; 365: 434–41.

Page 23: Contraversies in hypertension management

AGEING AND HYPERTENSION

The systolic blood pressure increases with age as the aorta stiffens* So healthy blood pressure at age 55 years will

have hypertension when they reach age 75 years.

*Opie L. Heart physiology. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2004.

Page 24: Contraversies in hypertension management

Major issues in the

decision to institute drug

therapy

Page 25: Contraversies in hypertension management

PRE- HYPERTENSION MANAGEMENT CONTROVERSY

Prehypertension: patients do not have HTN

but at risk for developing it

Trial of Preventing Hypertension

(TROPHY) showed treating prehypertension

with candesartan decreased progression

to stage 1 hypertension

Unknown whether managing prehypertension

with drug therapy and lifestyle modifications

decreases CV events or if this approach is

cost-effective?

Julius S, Nesbitt SD, Egan BM, et al. Feasibility of treating prehypertension with an angiotensin-receptor blocker. N Engl J Med 2006;354(16):1685–1697.

Page 26: Contraversies in hypertension management

THE CHOICE OF DRUG

Two meta-analyses conclusion*,#:

Blood-pressure reduction by any drug -

reduced cardiovascular morbidity and

mortality;

All classes of drugs reduced total and

cardiovascular mortality equally; and

Different classes provided differing degrees

of protection against individual cardiovascular

morbidities.*Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectively-designed overviews of randomised trials. Lancet 2003; 362: 1527–35.#Staessen JA, Wang JG, Thijs L. Cardiovascular prevention and blood pressure reduction: a quantittive overview updated until 1 March 2003. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1055–76.

Page 27: Contraversies in hypertension management

ALLHAT STUDY (ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AND LIPID-LOWERING TREATMENT TO PREVENT

HEART ATTACK TRIAL)

Compared three initial therapies: Diuretics,

Calcium-channel blocker, and

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)

inhibitors

No difference between treatments on fatal

coronary heart disease, non fatal myocardial

infarction, or all-cause mortality.

Thiazide-type diuretics remains

unsurpassed for reducing CV morbidity &

mortality in most patientsALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002;288(23):2981–2997.

Page 28: Contraversies in hypertension management

ASCOT TRIAL

ASCOT trial42 - 20 000 patients The trial was stopped prematurely -mortality

advantage in the calcium-channel-blocker-ACE inhibitor (CCB-ACEi) group42 .

Upset the hypothesis - equal blood-pressure reduction provides equal benefits,

prime place of β-blockers and even diuretics, first choice of drug, now threatened?

*Dahlöf B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, et al. Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 895–906.

Page 29: Contraversies in hypertension management

BETA BLOCKERS & DIURETICS

Beta blocker Atenolol – provides no cardio-protection*.

Diuretic-based regimens with or without blocker provoked more new cases of diabetes**.

OPINION - The protective effect of all classes

of drugs against cardiovascular mortality is the

same with equal degrees of blood pressure

reduction. The absolute benefit is best in elderly patients and

when judged by the fall in systolic blood pressure#.

*Williams B. Recent hypertension trials: implications andcontroversies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 813–27**Opie LH, Schall R. Old antihypertensives and new diabetes.J Hypertens 2004; 22: 1453–58.#Wang JG, Staessen JA, Franklin SS, Fagard R, Gueyffier F. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure lowering as determinants ofcardiovascular outcome. Hypertension 2005; 45: 907–13.

Page 30: Contraversies in hypertension management

BETA – BLOCKERS CONTROVERSY

Powerful arguments favour the view

that beta- blockers should be relegated

to third-line therapy ASCOT trial

Meta-analysis - atenolol was not as

favourable in clinical outcome in stroke

reduction*.

The increased risk of new cases of diabetes

if beta blockers were combined with a

diuretic**,#.

The known side-effects including sexual

problems, adverse blood-lipid changes, and

weight gain.

*Carlberg B, Samuelsson O, Lindholm LH. Atenolol in hypertension: is it a wise choice? Lancet 2004; 364: 1684–89.**Williams B. Recent hypertension trials: implications andcontroversies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 813–27# Opie LH, Schall R. Old antihypertensives and new diabetes.J Hypertens 2004; 22: 1453–58.

Page 31: Contraversies in hypertension management

ARE ALL BLOCKERS EQUALLY INEFFECTIVE?

Beta blockers such as carvedilol and nebivolol

could be safer than others, with less glucose

intolerance

Carvedilol was better than metoprolol in

maintaining glycaemic control as second-line

therapy in individuals with hypertension and

diabetes who were already receiving an ACE

inhibitor or ARB.

This difference was associated with a reduction in

microalbuminuria only in the carvedilol group.**Bakris GL, Fonseca V, Katholi RE, et al; GEMINI Investigators. Differential effects of beta-blockers on albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes. Hypertension 2005; 46: 1309–15.

Page 32: Contraversies in hypertension management

DIURETICS USE???

In addition to Increase incidence of new

cases of diabetes –

Diuretic therapy - associated with

increased serum uric acid. Cause or indicate cardiovascular harm, or is it a

beneficial side-effect of diuretic therapy?

Harm - Increasing serum amounts of uric acid

predicted increased target organ damage*.

Beneficial – As an anti-oxidative effect

*Viazzi F, Parodi D, Leoncini G, et al. Serum uric acid and target organ damage in primary hypertension. Hypertension 2005; 45: 991–96.

Page 33: Contraversies in hypertension management

OPINION

High concentrations of serum urate imply several

disadvantages outweigh the slight antioxidant

benefit.

Measures - reduction or elimination of the

diuretic dose, or

The use of losartan as an antihypertensive drug

because it lessens the diuretic induced rise in urate

compared with a blocker*.*Dahlöf B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet 2002; 359: 995–1003.

Page 34: Contraversies in hypertension management

JNC7 RECOMMENDATIONS

Thiazide-like diuretics preferred 1st line

therapy based on clinical trials showing

morbidity & mortality reductions

ALLHAT confirms 1st line role of thiazide diuretics

Compelling indications: comorbid conditions

where specific drug therapies provide unique

long-term benefits based on clinical trials

Drug therapy recommendations are in

combination with or in place of a thiazide diuretic Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003;42(6):1206–1252.

Page 35: Contraversies in hypertension management

COMBINATION OF ACE & ARBS?

CV events risk further reduced when ARB

combined with an ACE inhibitor for patients

with left ventricular dysfunction

Data supports ACE/ARB combination

therapy for patients with severe forms of

nephrotic syndrome

Combination ACE/ARB therapy not well

studied as standard treatment for HTN

Significantly higher risk of adverse effects

such as hyperkalemia

Page 36: Contraversies in hypertension management

ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in

combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint

Trial (ONTARGET)

Endpoint: composite of death, dialysis, SCr

doubling

25,620 patients > age 55 yr with diabetes & end-organ

damage or established atherosclerotic vascular disease

Combination therapy reduces proteinuria

more than monotherapy but worsens major

renal outcomesMann JF, Schmieder RE, McQueen M, et al. Renal outcomes with telmisartan, ramipril, or both, in people at high vascular risk (the ONTARGET study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet 2008;372:547-543.

Page 37: Contraversies in hypertension management

THERAPY FOR HYPERTENSION RELATED

COMPLICATIONS CHD - Diuretics with or without blockers,

ACE-inhibitors, and CCBs*.

Stroke - Dihydropyridine CCBs

significantly reduced stroke by 10%

compared with other therapies**

For prevention of progression of renal disease

(diabetic nephropathy) - ACE-inhibitors

should be used in type 1 and ARBs in type

2 diabetes#.*Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectively-designed overviews of randomised trials. Lancet 2003; 362: 1527–35**Angeli F, Verdecchia P, Reboldi GP, et al. Calcium channel blockade to prevent stroke in hypertension: a meta-analysis of 13 studies with 103,793 subjects. Am J Hypertens 2004; 17: 817–22.# Strippoli GF, Craig M, Deeks JJ, Schena FP, Craig JC. Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists on mortality and renal outcomes in diabetic nephropathy: systematic review. BMJ 2004; 329: 828.

Page 38: Contraversies in hypertension management
Page 39: Contraversies in hypertension management

IMPORTANCE OF SCREENING FOR VARIOUS IDENTIFIABLE CAUSES

Should all patients with hypertension

have screening for albuminuria and

glomerular filtration rates for earlier

recognition of the threat of progression

of renal damage?

Should a screening test for reno-

vascular hypertension be done on all

individuals with newly diagnosed

hypertension.

What is the best way to assess adrenal

adenomas for malignant disease and

functionality

Page 40: Contraversies in hypertension management

OPINION

Most patients do not need specific screening tests for their recognition unless initial routine assessment suggests their presence

The initial diagnosis - careful history, physical examination including waist and neck measurements, and the Following laboratory procedures: including urine

analysis with albumin-creatinine ratio, haematocrit, serum electrolytes and creatinine with a calculated glomerular filtration rate, fasting glucose and lipogram, and an electrocardiogram (ECG).

Measurement of serum uric acid could be a useful precaution if diuretic therapy is selected.

Page 41: Contraversies in hypertension management