Contract Year 1 Review IMT Tilt Thompkins MOS - NCSA 15 May 2002.
-
Upload
corey-lyons -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Contract Year 1 Review IMT Tilt Thompkins MOS - NCSA 15 May 2002.
Contract Year 1 ReviewIMT
Tilt Thompkins
MOS - NCSA
15 May 2002
13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 2
Program Development Approach
• Major Issues Addressed As NCSA Core Lead– Classified contract– Updating UI financial system after late start
date– Performance and Hiring as impacted by IL
State budget crisis
13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 3
Program Development Approach
• Major Issues Addressed As FAPOC– Engaging T&E Community
• Who, where, what• Level of HPC expertise
– On-site performance and security– Program development barriers
• T&E Community has limited HPC expertise• Sense that HPC/PET is trying to “tell them how to do their job”• In general, 50% of the funding for a T&E center is yearly
customer funds, and as a result, their time horizon is short (3 to 6 months)
– Projects are of limited interest given the relatively long development time
13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 4
• Top priorities: Application of HPC software tools and techniques with
live tests and hardware-in-the-loop simulations for test and evaluation.
Tools for collecting, organizing, and combining diverse information sets to optimally guide T&E decision making.
• Concentrate on: High-fidelity component and process models Real-time model execution Integration of information from disparate sources Test data repositories Optimal Test Strategy Planning Building IMT Communities of practice Training in new software tools & methodologies (Core)
Strategic Goals for IMT
13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 5
1. High-fidelity component and process models
2. Real-time models
3. Information Integration
3. Test data repositories
4. Optimal test planning
5. Building IMT communities of practice
FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05FY06IMT 002
CORE
IMT 002
CROSS-FA PROGRAMS
IMT 006
R-T INTEROPERABILITY MODEL DATA REDUCTION
FY03 PROJECT PLANNING: IMT
OPT. T&E DECISION MAKING
CORE TRANINING STATISTICSDATA REPOSITORIES
OPT. T&E DECISION MAKING
OPT. T&E DECISION MAKING
OPT. T&E DECISION MAKING
DATA REPOSITORIES
DATA REPOSITORIES
13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 6
Technical (Metrics)
• User Codes Impacted by PET
Logistics Common Model
Deployment planning and system acquisition analysis tool
TENA - Test and Training Enabling Architecture
Logical Range Enabler, see Joint Test and Training Range Roadmap (JTTRR)
13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 7
Technical (Metrics)
• User Contacts and Assistance
HPC Users: 3. Total of 9 months duration
Direct Contact:
T&E working staff: 19
T&E Management: 11
13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 8
Technical (Metrics)
• Tools introduced to community
– Parallel LCOM
Users have low HPC skills
Intensive use by 3 to 5 DoD staff
Logistics tail a major DoD expense and system evaluation criteria
13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 9
Technical (Metrics)
• Presentations Given: 5
• Conferences Held: NTR
• Workshops Held: NTR
• Seminars Held: NTR
• Training Held: In progress: WSMC intro to parallel programming, ATC datamining and data warehousing introduction
13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 10
Technical (Metrics)
• Technical Reports and Articles
– None
13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 11
IMT 002 Deployment Logistics Planning
• Objective: Implement the infrastructure needed to bring PET-1 capabilities into general DoD use
DeliverablesGreen: Generic Simulation Wrapping and convert to handle new LCOM version
Green: Improved HPC back-end and response surface generation capability
Green: Final Project Technical Report, 1 Oct 02
Yellow: Simplified User interface, 15 March 02
Yellow: Training Package – 15 April 02
Yellow: Demonstrate Mission Capable Rate Optimization– 31 May 02
• Budget - $75,000 • Period of Performance:
10/01 to 10/02
• PI: Tilt Thompkins
Yellow: Delayed for early focus on HPC back-end
13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 12
IMT 006 Training and User-Focused Workshops
• Objective: develop and deliver a user-centric training and problem development program
Deliverables
Yellow: Develop base training materials
Yellow: Deliver four four day workshops
Yellow: Deliver four, two day, training classes
• Budget - $100,000 • Period of Performance:
10/01 to 10/02
• PI: Tilt Thompkins
Developing requirements proved much more difficult than expected. Workshops now being scheduled for June and July
13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 13
IMT Invoice StatusCLIN 1 CLIN 1 CUM CLIN 4 CLIN 4 CUM
JUN 0 0
JUL 0 0
AUG 0 0
SEP 0 0
OCT 0 0 0 0
NOV 0 0 0 0
DEC 0 0 0 0
JAN 0 0 0 0
FEB 0 0 0 0
MAR 0 0 0 0
APR $141,502 $141,502 $50,966 $50,966
13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 14
IMT Budget
Project Expense ($000)
$0$20$40$60$80
$100$120$140$160$180$200
O N D J F M A M J J A S
Actual
Forecast
Plan
March - 68% of PlanForecast 90% of Plan
13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 15
IMT Budget
Core Expense ($000)
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
Actual
Forecast
Plan
March - 61% of PlanForecast 66% of Plan
13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 16
Staffing
• 2 On-Sites, ARL and AEDC
• 1 New Hire for AEDC
• 1 departed due to performance issues, ARL
• AEDC Position required 5 months to fill, security clearance issues have delayed arrival at AEDC
• ARL position now open
13-17 May 2002 Contract Year 1 Review 17
Summary
• University billing mistakes resolved and invoices should reflect close to estimated.
• On-Sites– Open slot at ARL– Security issues remain at AEDC