____________________________________________________________________

Page 1 of 2

CONTRACT NUMBER: WR18-009

CONTRACT TITLE: GATEWAY FEATURE – Johnston Road DESIGN-BUILD

ADDENDUM NUMBER.: 1

ADDENDUM ISSUE DATE: March 26, 2018 GENERAL Proponents are advised that Addendum No. 1 to Contract WR18-009 is hereby issued by the Owner. QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS: Q1: Can you please supply the brand guidelines for the City of White Rock, as

referenced in the RFP? A1: City of White Rock Branding Guidelines are attached for use. Q2: Do any precedence drawings exist from the current White Rock Signage Standards

noted? A2: Only suggested concept is in corporate report attached to RFP (Gateway Feature

rendering) Q3: Can you provide renderings from the Johnston Road Streetscape Revitalization

Project? A3: Phase 1 concept plan of Johnston Road is attached for information only. Q4: Can you explain the requirement for a role of a public artist? A4: The role of the public artist is to incorporate some artistic elements into the design of

the Gateway. Ideally, the artistic elements should reflect our seaside community and its heritage. While not explicitly a public art project; artistic designs, by an artist or other designer, are welcomed.

Q5: Is it possible to get an extension to the tender closing timeline? There is not a lot of

time to produce what you are asking for.? A5: Sorry, an extension is not contemplated at this time. Q6: Can you explain in more detail the 3D simulations? There is not much time to

produce these and we are wondering what purpose they are to serve that static renderings could not achieve?

A6: The 3D renderings are an optional way for the proponent to present its proposal and

are not mandatory. The intent of 3D simulation was to show what the finished gateway feature would look like, by superimposing a rendering of the proposed Gateway Feature design onto a photo of the Johnston Road streetscape. Computer model would be helpful but not required.

____________________________________________________________________

Page 2 of 2

Q7: Do you have 3D simulations for the JR streetscape revitalization project? A7: No, the City doesn't have 3D simulations of the Johnston Road Project. Q8: Typically gateway features will be absent of any branding to ensure they are timeless

and to save changing them every time the city brand gets updated. Does the gateway feature have to include the city brand?

A8: The Gateway Feature is intended to be timeless. Branding features should be

designed with the potential for future upgrades. Ultimately, the Committee will decide on the degree of branding, so options for branding should be considered.

Q9: Given that one or more submissions will be presented at the to the Gateway Feature

Committee and then again at the Public Information Meeting with much upfront work to be done. Will the fees of shortlisted proponents be covered in some fashion or an honorarium be provided to shortlisted vendors?

A9: A proponent may include presentation fees as part of its submission for consideration by the City. If presentation fees are paid, they will be the same to each shortlisted proponent required to do a presentation.

Q10: Is the signage on the feature to appear on both sides? A10: It is possible to place a sign on the south facing side of the feature; however, it would

likely involve different text and this is something the committee will likely decide on. Q11: Are sign permits required? A11: Any sign designed or recommended must be approved by City prior to consideration

for use. Q12: Is electrical engineering required? A12: If electrical features used, the proponent must engineer, design and install

components per the latest applicable electrical code. Q13: Does event banner space need to be included in the design of the gateway feature

given its location is generally in the area where the old banners are A13: The banner will be permanently removed from this site. The Gateway Feature is not

intended to be used for banners or notices.

Brand Communication GuidelinesRevised March 26, 2018

WhiteRoCk WoRDMaRk VeRSion

the White Rock wordmark uses three versions of the taglines for different situations.

“City by the Sea” is the most formal tagline for use in such official pieces as the formal stationery package for use by the Mayor, Council and City related projects, initiatives, and events.

PRefeRReD logo VeRSionS

in cases where 4-colour process or 3-colour pantone printing is not possible, alternate versions of the logo may be used as indicated here. these include:

• 1 colour solid version of the logo in black• 1 colour “knocked-out” version in white

surrounded by solid black• gray scale version of the logo using black• Solid blue version

these alternates are also to be used for single colour versions of the logo particularly in newsprint where RoP advertising includes a single colour option as a spot. only the dark blue is acceptable as an alternate, one colour version. at no time is the logo to be seen in one colour such as red, yellow, purple etc.

alteRnate logo VeRSionS

in cases where a horizontal logo is not possible, alternate stacked versions of the logo may be used as indicated here. these include:

• 2 colour version of the logo in dark blueand black

• 1 colour solid version of the logo in black• 1 colour “knocked-out” version in white

surrounded by solid black

0.5cm

aRea of iSolation

the City of White Rock logo should always be isolated by a minimum amount of white space to maintain separation between the logo and other elements (type, folds, other graphics not including background colour) on all printed materials and applications. if possible, use more than the minimum white space to enhance presentation of the logo. the area of isolation is measured by the height of the letter “k.”

MiniMUM SiZe

the logo should not be smaller than 0.5 cm in height from top to bottom of graphic when used without the full name.

When used with the full name, the logo should not be smaller than 1 cm in height from top to bottom of graphic.

x

x

x

x

1cm

ColoUR Palette the logo may be used in two colour formats for print: CMyk and 2 colour pantone. the colour values are stated on this page. CMyk would be used when four colours are needed, on such pieces as photography or advertisements.

for use on-line and electronic media, RgB values are also provided. on some collateral pieces, accent colours are introduced.

as a complimentary colour, and for various accents, the sand colour may be used sparingly in background elements.

DARK BLUEPMS 655C100 M68 Y0 K52R0 G47 B101

COOL GREYPMS COOL GREY 6C0 M0 Y0 K31R186 G188 B190

SANDPMS 4525C0 M7 Y39 K17R218 G199 B146

BLACKC0 M0 Y0 K100R0 G0 B0

Base Colours

accent Colours

Scala Sans (set in upper and lowercase):

aBCDefghijklMnoPqRStUVWxyZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 1234567890

scala sans caps (set in lowercase):

abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 1234567890

Susie’s Hand Regular

abcdefgHijklmnopqRStuvwxyz abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 1234567890

subheader

Body Copy for ads and shorter documents. Umsan eu feu feugait lut eugait vent wis alit, conulla mcommy nisl ing estrud tet wis dolum eum accum enim zzrit lut am venit wis adipit ute vel dit, quis accum dunt dolor susci tie.

header & Display type

SCala SanS RegUlaR

SCala SanS CaPS

PRiMaRy tyPefaCeS there is one primary typeface for the City of White Rock:

Scala Sans is used in various weights and styles (Regular, Caps and italic).

headings and display type are set with Scala Sans Regular (upper and lowercase).

Body copy is Scala Sans Regular. Paragraph type is set left aligned.

Susie’s hand Regular may also be used sparingly. this font requires a slight stroke to increase the weight, and may only be used for display headings. Do not use in full sentences, and do not overuse.

SCala SanS RegUlaR

display HeaderSUSie’S hanD RegUlaR

This graphic standard manual was created by

JOHNSTON ROAD Conceptual Gateway Redesign Report

7

CONCEPT PLAN

PROPERTYLINE

PROPERTYLINE

ROADCENTERLINE

12.0m FROM F.O.C. TO F.O.C.

NORTHBOUNDLANE

SOUTHBOUNDLANE

2.2m 3.8m 2.8m3.7m

SIDEWALK PLANTING BED AREA ROADWAY SIDEWALKPLANTING BED AREA

0 31:75

PROPERTYLINE

PROPERTYLINE

ROADCENTERLINE

NORTHBOUNDLANE

SOUTHBOUNDLANE

7.0m FROM F.O.C. TO F.O.C.2.2m 6.3m 5.8m3.4m

SIDEWALK PLANTING BED AREA ROADWAY SIDEWALKPLANTING BED AREA

0 31:75

B

BW

B

PA R

R

R

MG

MC

MC

PA

PA

TG

TG

TG

W

BT

BT

BT

RG GFRG

RG

BR

BR

BS

BS

BSSF

SF

SF GF

LS

LS MG

LS

DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY

RECYCLING

MAJOR GATEWAY PHASE ONE North Bluff Street to Russell Avenue

PEDESTRIAN ZONE PEDESTRIAN ZONE PEDESTRIAN ZONE PEDESTRIAN ZONEFURNISHING ZONE FURNISHING ZONE FURNISHING ZONE FURNISHING ZONE

JOHNSON ROAD

RU

SSEL

L AV

ENU

E

NO

RTH

BLU

FF R

OAD

NORTH

S1: NARROW SIDEWALK CROSS SECTION - TYPICAL S2: WIDE SIDEWALK CROSS SECTION - TYPICAL

MID BLOCK CROSSING

LIGHT STANDARD

BIKE RACK

BUS SHELTER BENCH

SITE FURNISHING

TREE GRATE

POTENTIAL WAYFINDING

MINOR GATEWAY FEATURE

RAIN GARDEN

PUBLIC ART

BOULEVARD TREE

N.T.S.

FUTURE PLAZA

S1 S2

FUTURE PLAZA