Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

20
Continuous student assesment : implementation and results P Truffert, D Lacroix, D Gosset M Lance, A Deroo, JC Alexandre

description

Continuous student assesment : implementation and results. P Truffert, D Lacroix, D Gosset M Lance, A Deroo, JC Alexandre. French medical studies. 6 years. DCEM4. DCEM4 ( ≈ 450 students). CSCTU faculty exam. ECN : national ranking exam About 8000 students in France. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

Page 1: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

P Truffert, D Lacroix, D Gosset

M Lance, A Deroo, JC Alexandre

Page 2: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

French medical studies

6 years

DCEM4

CSCTU faculty exam

ECN : national ranking examAbout 8000 students in France

DCEM4 (≈ 450 students)

Page 3: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

Lille II rank at ECN : disappointing results

28

34

28 27

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Rank

One of the national universities quality criteria

Page 4: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

Csctu before 2011

Written final exam 4 medical cases scenarios to resolve

Problem solving, clinical reasoning, knowledge and therapeutic

80% of the total exam score

Oral test Bedside evaluation

Specific therapeutic oriented program

Page 5: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

Csctu 2011 : continuous assesment

Same written/oral testing

No specific program The hole ECN program is covered by

assesment 20 assesments, 2 case scenarios each

Page 6: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

Csctu : continuous evaluation

The « fridays »

2 cases« ecn type»Hématologia

2 cases« ecn »

Psychiatry

CourseAnd correctionHématologia

1 Corrected record

csctu

Friday1h30 evaluation 2h

Monday20 senior1 spécialist

Friday1h30 evaluationMonday

Page 7: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

Monday Correction

Software

20 senior residents Sensibilisation

case elaboration Case correction (which keywords, what relative importance)

Présence of 1 spécialist Can modify some keywords (synonyms etc…) Sees the principal difficulties encountered by the students Can adapt the learning messages for next friday

Page 8: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

Correction du lundi

Page 9: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

QUESTION N° 2

Comment se définit une hypertension portale?Quelles en sont les principales manifestations cliniques absentes de l'observation?Quel est le score de Child du patient?

L'hypertension portale est définiepar une augmentation de la pression portale au-delà de 15 mm Hg 3ou par une élévation du gradient de pression porte-cave supérieur à 5 mm Hg 3

Principales manifestations cliniques absente de l'observation

Circulation collatérale cutanée abdominale 2Splénomégalie 2Oedèmes des membres inférieurs 2Hydrotorax 2

Score de ChildAscite 2; EH 1; TP 2; Bilirubine 2; Albumine 1 = Child B8 5

Sous-total pour la question 19

22%2%

47%

- 7

Page 10: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

Continuous assesment

Weekly individualized results

Page 11: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

Other learning facilities

Saturday morning seminars In the two last months before ECN

5 courses (3h) « best of » concerning themes chosen by the students

Evening conferences 2 per week 4 case scenarios and 3h correction

Page 12: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

Did results change? (and how…)

Page 13: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

Analysis strategy

Individual student ranking variation 2009-2011 Description by quartiles

Correlation between csctu ranking and ECN ranking 2011

Page 14: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

Analysis strategy

ECN ranking estimation linear Regression Predicted values – Observed values

Under estimation : student winned + 1000 ranks at ECN

Over estimation : student lost -1000 ranks ECN Correct estimation : difference < 1000 places

Page 15: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

Results

Ranking distribution by quartiles 2009-2011

Q Q Q Q

Page 16: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

Results

Corrélation csctu ranking vs ECN

Correlation r : 0.8 (p<10-4)

Détermination r2 : 0.64 36% of the ECN was not explained by the csctu ranking

Page 17: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

Results

Predictive quality of the csctu ranking

38% overestimated : falsy reassured ?

under

Over

Page 18: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

National ranking of Lille 2 : 2007-2011

28

34

28 27

14

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Rang

Page 19: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

Back to the future…

Promotion effect?Waiting for 2012 confirmation…

National ranking of Lille 2 : 2007-2011

Understanding which learning and teaching issues are involved?

Page 20: Continuous student assesment : implementation and results

Thank you for your attention