Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities...
-
Upload
megan-watts -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities...
Continuous Improvement
Performance Plan (CIPP)
New Hanover County Schools
Students with Disabilities
Data Story
Indicator 1Graduation Rate
State Target: 80%; State Average: 59.8%1112 – SWD met AMO w/ Improvement
Percent of youth with IEPs graduating
from high school with a regular diploma.
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
48% 38% 46% 44% 44% 42% 48%
Indicator 2Drop Out
State Target: 6.0%; State Average: 5.2%
Percent of youth with IEPs dropping out
of high school.
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11
8.3% 9.7% 6.8% 8.4% 11.7% ??%
Indicator 3Assessment Participation & Performance/Reading
0809 & 0910 – SWD made AYP in grades 3-8
1112 –SWD met AMO in Grades 3-8 & 10
Participation
Performance
Grade State Targe
t
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
3-8 95 99 100 100 100 99
10 95 96 73 73 92 97
3-8 44.5 24.1 39.8 45.6 42.0 47.1
10 50.9 22.2 23.3 25.7 20.3 52.9
Indicator 3Assessment Participation & Performance/Math
0809 & 0910 – SWD made AYP in grades 3-8
1112 – SWD met AMO in grades 3-8 & 10
Performance
Participation
Grade
State Target
07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
3-8 95 99 100 100 100 99
10 95 84 73 76 94 93
3-8 59.9 39.8 56.0 61.4 61.0 63.1
10 51.1 27.8 39.3 51.9 51.6 54.8
Indicator 4aLTS Suspension/Expulsion
Rates of suspension and expulsion of students with disabilities greater than 10 days in a school year that is twice the state average or greater (0.36%).
08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
>0.74% >0.74% >0.74% >0.74%
Indicator 4bShort-term Suspension
Rates of cumulative short suspension of students with disabilities greater than 10 days in a school year by race and ethnicity that is greater than the state disproportionality target.
State Target: 5%; State Average: N/A08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12
8.52% 7.27% 7.65% n/a
Indicator 5Least Restrictive Environment
Percent of children with IEPs aged 6through 21 served in regular,
separate, or public, private, home or hospitalsettings.
Indicator 5Least Restrictive Environment
Amount of Removal
State Targe
t
State
Avg
05-06
06-07
07-08
08-09
09-10
10-11
11-12
Regular 65.6% 64.8 55.4
52.3
50.1 61.8 59.6
58.6 57.5
Separate
15.3% 14.5 24.1
22.6
20.0 18.5 17.5
15.9 12.8
Indicator 6Preschool LRE
No data or targets set at this time
Indicator 7Early Childhood Outcomes
Percent of preschool children with IEPs who demonstrate improvement in positive social-emotional skills, acquisition and use of knowledge and skills, and use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs.
A. % Substantially improvement byage 6
B. % Functioningat age 6
Skills State Average
State Average
NHCS 09-10
NHCS 10-11
A. Social/Emotional
88.9% 88.9% 90% 72%
B. Social/Emotional
57.0% 57.0% 47% 29%
A. Com/Literacy 89.0% 89.0% 77% 77%
B. Com/Literacy 54.1% 54.1% 56% 48%
A. Approp. Behavior
88.3% 88.3% 86% 70%
B. Approp. Behavior
67.9% 67.9% 60% 50%
Indicator 8Parent Involvement
Percent of parents with a school age child receiving special education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving service and results for children with disabilities.
State Target: 40%.
08-09
43.0%
Indicator 9Disproportionality Spec Ed
Percent of districts with disproportionaterepresentation of racial and ethnic groupsin special education and related servicesthat is the result of inappropriate identification.
State Target 0%
NHCS 0%
Indicator 10Disproportionality by Category
NHCS data indicate disproportionaterepresentation of racial and ethnic groupsin specific disability categories that is theresult of inappropriate identification.
State target: 0%NHCS:
Disability
09-10 10-11 11-12
IDMI 5.0 5.36 5.36SED 6.22 5.00 7.81
Indicator 1190 Day Timeline
Percent of children referred for whom a
referral was received and placementdetermined within 90 days. State Target: 100%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11
45% 77% 67% 91% 95% 98%
Indicator 12Part C to Part B
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3
and who are found eligible for Part B who receive special education and related services by their third birthday.
State Target: 100%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11
74% 78% 88% 96% 100% 100%
Indicator 13IEPs and Postsecondary Goals
Percent of youth aged 16 and above with
an IEP that includes coordinated,measurable, annual IEP goals andtransition services that will
reasonablyenable the child to meet the postsecondary goals.
Indicator 13IEPs and Postsecondary Goals
State Target: 100%
05-06
06-07 07-08 07-08 09-10 10-11
Initial 6% 24% 35% 64% 71% TBD
Corrected within one year
n/a 100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Indicator 14Post-School Outcomes
Percent of youth who had IEP’s, are nolonger in secondary school and who havebeen competitively employed, enrolled insome type of postsecondary school, or,both, within one year of leaving highschool.
State Baseline Data: 75%NHCS Baseline: 70%
Indicator 15General Supervision Part 1Percent of noncompliance
identified and corrected within one year.
State Target: 100% 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11
Initial 25% 66% 91% 81% 90% TBDCorrected within one year
n/a 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
What’s the Plan (PreK-12)? Training in Intensive Scientific, Research-based
Reading and Math instruction KU Content Literacy Continuum (Secondary
Pilot) Superintendent’s Graduation-Dropout Task
Force Response to Instruction (RTI) K-8 & Preschool
Play Based Assessment Increase School-wide Positive Behavior
Support Sites Targeted re-evaluations of SED and IDMI Re-training and monitoring of Short-term
suspension processes
IDEA 2004 – 34 CFR 300.604 Meets Requirements (NHCS status –
08-09, 09-10, & 10-11) Needs Assistance – Direct the use of
funds Needs Intervention – Withhold funds Needs Substantial Intervention –
Recover Funds
What are the consequences?
Questions?