Content Mesh Independence Study Taylor-Couette Validation Wavy Taylor Validation Turbulent...
-
Upload
junior-golden -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of Content Mesh Independence Study Taylor-Couette Validation Wavy Taylor Validation Turbulent...
Progress Report
Qian Wentao
24/05/2011
Content
Mesh Independence Study
Taylor-Couette Validation
Wavy Taylor Validation
Turbulent Validation
Thermal Validation
Simple Model Test
Plans for Next Period
Mesh Independence Study
100 60 120 100 60 180 100 60 250 100 60 400
Taylor-Couette Validation
1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2 2.1 2.21
2
4
8
16
32
64
Experiment DataSimulation Data
Wavelength
T/T
c
Full Length
Wavy Taylor Validation
η(a/b) a(cm)b(cm
) h(cm)R(11R
c)Ω(rad/
s)Upper Bound
circum radial axial
0.868 2.2052.54
010.05
01266.
117.222
42 Free 100 30 250
Fundamental angular frequencyω=17.279s=ω/(m Ω)=0.334
Wavy Taylor Validation
η(a/b) a(cm)b(cm
) h(cm)R(11R
c)Ω(rad/
s)Upper Bound
circum radial axial
0.900 2.2862.54
0 7.6201447.
625.050
61 Free 100 25 190
Two fundamental frequenciesω=27.227s=ω/(m Ω)=0.362
Wavy Taylor Validation
η(a/b) a(cm)b(cm
) h(cm)R(11R
c)Ω(rad/
s)Upper Bound
circum radial axial
0.950 5.6495.94
6 8.9102036.
112.194
13 Free 200 25 200
Fundamental angular frequencyω=50.265s=ω/(m Ω)=0.458
Comparing with Experiment Data
η(a/b) Computed S1
Measured S1
0.868 0.334 0.320±0.005
0.900 0.362 0.360±0.010
0.950 0.458 0.450±0.001
The difference is located in the reasonable region of uncertainty
Need to be calculated longer.
Turbulent Validation
Comparison of normalized mean angular momentum profiles between presentsimulation (Re=8000) and the experiment of Smith & Townsend (1982).
uθ Azimuthal VelocityR1 Radius of Inner CylinderR2 Radius of Outer CylinderU0 Tangential Velocity of Inner Cylinderr Distance from Centre Axis
Boundary Conditions
R1 = 0.1525 mR2 = 0.2285 mΩ = 22.295 rad/s (Re=17295)Height = 1.80 m
End walls are free surfaces
k- epsilon and k- omega were chosen to compare
Measure points are located along the mid-height of the gap
Mesh DensityAxial = 400Circle = 100Radial = 60
Comparing with Experiment Data
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 10.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Experiment DataSimulation Data k-epsilonSimulation Data k-omega
z/d
U*r
/(U
1*R
1)
Possible Reasons for Difference
Flow time interval is not enough
ΔTepsilon=27.68s ΔTomega=20.48s
Sampling frequency
fexperiment=10kHz fsimulation=200Hz
Mesh density
Tip: 文章名称 used k-epsilon as the turbulent model
Thermal Validation
Keq= -h*r*ln(R1/R2)/kRe = Ω* (R1-R2)*R1/ν
h Convective Heat Transfer CoefficientR1 Radius of Inner CylinderR2 Radius of Outer CylinderK Thermal Conductivityν Kinematic Viscosityr Distance from Centre Axis
Fluid is air
Boundary Conditions
Keq= -h*r*ln(R1/R2)/kRe = Ω* (R1-R2)*R1/ν
R1 = 1.252 cmR2 = 2.216 cmHeight = 50.64 Gr= 1000 ΔT= 7.582 KTi = 293K To= 300.582KEnd walls are fixed and insulated
Re=[40 120 280]Ω=[5.008 15.023 35.054] rad/s
Since for η=0.565 Rec= 70,All the three cases are in laminar mode.
Mesh DensityAxial = 1000Circle = 100Radial = 60
Comparing with Experiment Data
Re2 h(w/m2k) keq Experiment Data Residue
1600 5.639 1.568 1.080 9.8e-04
14400 9.721 2.704 1.500 2.0e-03
78400 16.022 4.456 2.120 1.8e-03
Comparing with Experiment Data
Possible Reasons for Difference
Boundary condition set-up
ideal gas, pressure based, real apparatus error (axial temperature gradient, end walls effect)
Wrong understanding of the experiment
Simple Model Test
R1 = 96.85 mmR2 = 97.5 mmHeight = 140 mm Q=4 L/min Vin= 0.000168 m/sTin = 308K Tout= 551KΩ=29.311 rad/sEnd walls are fixed and insulated
Measure points are located in the vertical lines close to the inner cylinder.
Since for η=0.975 Rec= 260.978,In this case Re=1837.075So, it is in laminar mode.
Important Tips
Combined flows in annular space not only on the operating point (axial Reynolds and Taylor numbers), but also e and strongly e on geometry and, to a lesser degree, on parietal thermal conditions.
Plans for Next Period
Keep running both of the turbulent cases
Finish the thermal validation
Couette flow validation
Repeat Taylor-couette validation with full length
Wavy validation should be finished with running 0.95 case long enough
More validation of the thermal part (optional)
Keep turbulent case running
Finish simple model test
Check geometry related paper