Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Antenatal Diagnosis Diagnosis Van Mieghem… · 06/10/2013 1 Tim...

21
06/10/2013 1 Tim Van Mieghem Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Antenatal Diagnosis Overview introduction diagnosing CDH tips and tricks outcome prediction ultrasound MRI functional tests

Transcript of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Antenatal Diagnosis Diagnosis Van Mieghem… · 06/10/2013 1 Tim...

06/10/2013

1

Tim Van Mieghem

Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Antenatal Diagnosis

Overview

• introduction

• diagnosing CDH – tips and tricks

• outcome prediction

ultrasound

MRI

functional tests

06/10/2013

2

incidence 1/2000-4000

85% left sided

13% right sided

2% bilateral

25% anatomical anomalies

20% chromosomal anomalies

Epidemiology

Survival isolated CDH

61 %

n=146

78 %

n=167

72 %

n=105 79 %

n=117

71 %

n=1222

70%

n=63

70 %

n=86

06/10/2013

3

Prenatal statistics

19%

4%

30%

47%

TOP

IUFD

NND

live at discharge

Gallot et al, UOG 2007; Central France Birth Registry 1986-2003

Overview

• introduction

• diagnosing CDH – tips and tricks

• outcome prediction

ultrasound

MRI

functional tests

06/10/2013

4

Prenatal Diagnosis

Diaphragm

hypoechogenic line between lungs – viscera

13 wk 21 wk

Prenatal Diagnosis

prenatal diagnosis = 60-80%

06/10/2013

5

Paradoxical breathing

06/10/2013

6

Liver herniation

Right sided CDH

Conturso UOG 2012

‘Horizontal stomach’

13 wks 24 wks

06/10/2013

7

Bilateral CDH

Hiasa et al. Clin Imaging 2012

Overview

• introduction

• diagnosing CDH – tips and tricks

• outcome prediction

ultrasound

MRI

functional tests

06/10/2013

8

In ISOLATED CDH

Pathology

pulmonary

hypoplasia

pulmonary

hypertension

06/10/2013

9

Outcome prediction: LHR

Learning curve

N=77

Cruz-Martinez, UOG 2010

LHR @ 22-29 weeks

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

<0.7 0.8-0.9 1.0-1.1 1.2-1.3 1.4-1.5 >1.6

Lung to Head Ratio (mm)

Surv

ival

rat

e (

%)

Outcome prediction: LHR

Jani et al 2006

06/10/2013

10

Prediction: O/E LHR

OBSERVED Fetal Lung Area

(fetus at risk for lung hypoplasia)

area measured

0.5

EXPECTED Fetal Lung Area

(matched normal fetus)

matched fetus

based on

gestational age

area predicted

2.0

O/E = 25%

Liver herniation Antenatal CDH registry 2006

Survival: 75% → 53%

Prediction: liver

06/10/2013

11

< 15 15-25 26-35 36-45

O/E LHR (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Surv

ival

rat

e (

%)

46 and higher

extreme

liver in abdomen (“down”) liver in thorax (“up”)

severe moderate mild

Clinical algorithm

Deprest J et al, Sem Fetal Neonat Med, 2008 - n= 329.

Isolated CDH expectantly managed (n=100)

Jani et al UOG 2008

≤ 25 26-45 >45

Patch rate (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

O/E LHR (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Conventional ventilation

day

s

≤ 25 26-45 >45

O/E LHR (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Enteral feeding

day

s

<25 26-45 >45

O/E LHR (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

NICU**

day

s

<25 26-45 >45

O/E LHR (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

≤ 25 26-45 >45

O/E LHR (%)

Oxygen O2 at 28d (%)

100

Morbidity

06/10/2013

12

Problems with 2D-US

Single plane

Single lung

3D volume

Both lungs

Solutions

06/10/2013

13

3D ultrasound

Ruano JUM 2013

3D volume

Both lungs

Solutions

06/10/2013

14

≤ 25 26-35 36-45 > 45

Observed to expected total FLV (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Surv

ival

rat

e (%

)

≤ 25 26-35 36-45 > 45

Observed to expected total FLV (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Surv

ival

rat

e (%

)

Liver down

Liver up: Survival 50% - volume linear relation to survival Liver down: Survival 75% - volume is not predictive of outcome

Cannie et al UOG 2008

20% survival rate

~ 33%

MRI volumetry

Liver up

Lee et al. J Ped Surg 2011

Morbidity prediction MRI

06/10/2013

15

Liver-thorax ratio

Cannie et al, UOG2008 – Lazar J Pediatr Surg 2012

0 10 20 30 40 50

LiTR (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

o/e

TF

LV

(%

)

Cannie et al. Radiology 2008 Rypens et al. Radiology 2001

MRI - nomograms

06/10/2013

16

Isolated CDH born alive >30 wks, paired observations (n=76)

False positive rate (%)

Sen

siti

vity

(%

)

100 75 50 25 0

100

75

50

25

0

2D-US

MRI

Cannie et al UOG 2008

2D-US vs. MRI

Kehl et al. JUM 2013

3D-US vs. MRI

Survival Need ECMO

06/10/2013

17

Overview

• introduction

• diagnosing CDH – tips and tricks

• outcome prediction

ultrasound

MRI

functional tests

Current problems

pulmonary hypoplasia

pulmonary

hypertension

pulmonary hypoplasia

06/10/2013

18

Functional tests

Pulmonary artery Doppler

Hyperoxygenation test

3D lung vascularity

Fractional moving blood volumes

Pulmonary artery Doppler

Cruz-Martinez UOG 2013

06/10/2013

19

UOG 2011

PAH

No PAH

DEATH PAH

06/10/2013

20

Fractional moving blood volume

Cruz-Martinez FD&T 2010

Conclusions

• CDH is diagnosed in (only) 60-80%

• outcome prediction isolated cases:

ultrasound (O/E LHR – liver)

MRI (lung volume – LiTR)

• functional tests experimental

06/10/2013

21

Thank you !

[email protected]