Conformação gonadal, caracterização histoquímica e fileConformação gonadal, caracterização...
Transcript of Conformação gonadal, caracterização histoquímica e fileConformação gonadal, caracterização...
Conformação gonadal, caracterização histoquímica e
ultraestrutural da gônada masculina e
espermatozoides em espécies de águas-vivas
(Cubozoa e Scyphozoa, Medusozoa, Cnidaria)
Gonadal structure, histochemistry and ultrastructural
characterization of male gonad and sperm of
jellyfish species (Cubozoa and Scyphozoa,
Medusozoa, Cnidaria)
Gisele Rodrigues Tiseo
Dissertação apresentada ao Instituto de
Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo
para obtenção de Título de Mestre em
Ciências, na Área de Zoologia.
Orientador: Prof. Dr. André Carrara Morandini
São Paulo
2016
Comissão Julgadora
Tiseo, Gisele Rodrigues
Conformação gonadal, caracterização histoquímica e
ultraestrutural da gônada masculina e espermatozoides em espécies de
águas-vivas (Cubozoa e Scyphozoa, Medusozoa, Cnidaria)
148 páginas
Dissertação (Mestrado) - Instituto de Biociências da
Universidade de São Paulo. Departamento de Zoologia.
1. Scyphozoa 2. Cubozoa 3. Espermatogênese
I. Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Biociências.
Departamento de Zoologia.
Prof(a) Dr(a) Prof(a) Dr(a)
Prof. Dr. André Carrara Morandini
Agradecimentos
Agradeço a agência de fomento FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do
Estado de São Paulo Proc. MS 2014/08785-0, Proc. BEPE 2015/15527-0 e Proc.
Temático 2011/50242-5) pelo auxílio financeiro concedido para o desenvolvimento
desta pesquisa.
Ao Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Instituto Oceanográfico,
CEBIMar e Universidade de São Paulo pela infra-estrutura utilizada.
Ao meu orientador Prof. Dr. André Carrara Morandini pela amizade, apoio,
sugestões e compreensão ao longo desses dois anos de trabalho.
Ao Prof. Dr. Peter L. Harrison, da Southern Cross University, Austrália, por ter
me recebido em seu laboratório e grupo de pesquisa e auxiliado no desenvolvimento do
projeto BEPE. Obrigada pela oportunidade de conhecer novas fronteiras e pelo
intercâmbio de conhecimento.
Agradeço de todo o coração aos técnicos Lea Taylor, Paul Kelly, Maxine Daves
e Barbara Harrison pela amizade e auxílio nas coletas, preparações das amostras e
infinitas conversas. Obrigada por serem minha pequena “família” no exterior.
Ao Prof. Jamie Seymour por ter me recebido em seu laboratório na James Cook
University em Cairns, Austrália. Agradeço pelo auxilio nas coletas e troca de
conhecimento.
Aos alunos de pós-graduação do Prof. Jamie Seymour – Robert Courtney e Sally
Browning pela ajuda nas coletas em Queensland e curta convivência.
Ao Prof. Dr. Alberto Ribeiro responsável pelo Laboratório de Microscopia
Eletrônica do Instituto de Biociências.
Aos integrantes do Laboratório de Microscopia Eletrônica do Departamento de
Genética – Camila e Alexandre – pelas disucssões produtivas e dicas de terminologias.
Aos técnicos Márcio Valentim Cruz e Sheila Carmo pelos cafés e amizade. E ao técnico
de microscopia eletrônica de transmissão Waldir Caldeira pela amizade e auxílio em
todas as preparações de ultraestrutura.
Aos técnicos do Laboratório de Histologia do Departamento de Zoologia, Enio
Mattos e Phillip Lenktaitis obrigada pela amizade e auxilio nas preparações de
histologia.
Aos integrantes do Laboratório de Cultivo e Estudos em Cnidaria – Júlia Beneti,
Renato Nagata, Henrique Alves, Clarissa Garbi Molinari, Priscila Cunha, Leandro
Santos, Max Maronna, Mayara Jordão, Edgar Gamero, Jonathan Lawley e Flávia
Murari – pela convivência, amizade, ajudas em coletas, discussões produtivas e apoio.
Muito obrigada por tudo!
Aos meus amigos (e respectivos) que sempre estão (e estarão) lá por mim –
Jaqueline Mariano, Bruna Gasbarra, Laianne Mendes, Roberto Radesca, Jefferson
Platini, Pedro Henrique, Renata Bannitz, Carla Peres de Paula, Luiza Saad, Bruna
Trevisan, Amanda Yano, Thalma e integrantes da República SF. Muito obrigada pela
amizade e suporte!!!
Aos amigos do Departamento de Zoologia e do Curso de Verão em Zoologia –
Rachel, Rafael Henrique, Adriana, Mariane, Carol, Guilherme, Alipio, Ana Bolatto,
Caio’s, Gabriel, Isabela, Jorge, Ligia, Marilia, Amanda, Pedro’s, Stefania, Thalles,
Victor, Loboda, Licia, Kleber, Karla Soares, Karla Paresque, Carolina Nisa, Anderson
Tama, Flávia Pentean e Juliana Bertacini – obrigada pela amizade, convivência e
risadas!
Agradeço ao meu namorado – Lucas Nastri – pelo apoio, cumplicidade e
compreensão (mesmo nas épocas malucas de entrega de relatório). Obrigada por estar
presente mesmo à distância e me fazer feliz.
Por fim, agradeço à minha família – Marcos, Marli e Jessica – sem vocês nada
em minha vida faria sentido e nada seria possivel. A realização de mais este trabalho so
foi possivel graças ao eterno apoio e suporte que vocês me proporcionam diariamante.
Amo vocês incondicionalmente e agradecerei por fazer parte desta familia hoje e
sempre!
Sumário
Introdução Geral ............................................................................................................................ 8
Ciclo de Vida, Reprodução sexuada e descrição do Sistema reprodutor masculino ............... 10
Espermiotaxonomia ................................................................................................................. 13
Referências .............................................................................................................................. 17
Capítulo 1 .................................................................................................................................... 27
Spermatogenesis in the cubozoans Tamoya haplonema Müller, 1859 and Chiropsalmus
quadrumanus (Müller, 1859), highlighting the gonadal cycle .................................................... 27
Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 28
Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 29
Material and Methods ............................................................................................................. 31
Results ..................................................................................................................................... 32
Discussion ............................................................................................................................... 35
Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. 39
References ............................................................................................................................... 39
List of Figures ......................................................................................................................... 48
Capítulo 2 .................................................................................................................................... 54
Spermatogenesis and sperm morphology in cubozoans from SE Brazilian and Australian coasts
..................................................................................................................................................... 54
Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 55
Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 56
Material and Methods ............................................................................................................. 59
Results ..................................................................................................................................... 61
Discussion ............................................................................................................................... 67
Acknoledgements .................................................................................................................... 71
References ............................................................................................................................... 71
List of Figures ......................................................................................................................... 83
Capítulo 3 .................................................................................................................................... 94
Histochemistry and ultrastructure of spermatogenesis in Chrysaora lactea, Lychnorhiza lucerna
and Cassiopea sp. ........................................................................................................................ 94
Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 95
Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 96
Material and Methods ............................................................................................................. 98
Results ................................................................................................................................... 100
Discusssion ............................................................................................................................ 103
Acknowledgement ................................................................................................................. 106
References ............................................................................................................................. 106
List of Figures ....................................................................................................................... 116
Capítulo 4 .................................................................................................................................. 124
Considerações Finais ................................................................................................................. 124
Resumo ...................................................................................................................................... 129
Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 131
Apêndice I - Protocolo de Fixador para Histologia ................................................................... 133
Apêndice II - Protocolo de Histologia em Historesina .............................................................. 135
Apêndice III - Técnicas Histológicas e Histoquímicas de Colorações ...................................... 138
Apêndice IV - Protocolos dos Fixadores para Microscopia Eletrônica de Transmissão........... 143
Apêndice V- Protocolo de Microscopia Eletrônica de Transmissão ......................................... 146
8
Introdução Geral
O filo Cnidaria é considerado um grupo monofilético composto por dois grandes
clados, Anthozoa e Medusozoa (Collins 2002; Collins et al. 2006), sendo esta divisão
bem suportada por caracteres morfológicos e moleculares (Schuchert 1993; Bridge et al.
1995; Odorico and Miller 1997; Collins 2002; Daly et al. 2007; Kayal et al. 2013;
Zapata et al. 2015). Seus representantes formam um grupo diverso de animais
relativamente simples caracterizados pela presença da cnida (Odorico and Miller 1997;
Collins 2002; Daly et al. 2007; Collins 2009; Reft and Daly 2012) e diversidade do
ciclo de vida com a presença ou ausência da alternância de gerações (Bridge et al.
1995).
A filogenia dos diferentes grupos de Cnidaria ainda permanece de certa forma
pouco resolvida, uma vez que não há um consenso de quais são as relações entre as
diferentes classes e ordens que compõem o filo. Os problemas classificatórios em
Cnidaria têm atraído o interesse de zoólogos (Werner 1973a) e são diversos os trabalhos
que apresentam teorias e hipóteses filogenéticas tentativas para classificar o grupo. As
principais divergências concernem na problemática sobre: a diversificação dos ciclos de
vida e qual dos dois estágios ou formas corporais (pólipo ou medusa) seria o mais basal
(Werner 1973a; Werner 1973b; Bridge et al. 1992; Schuchert 1993; Bridge et al. 1995;
Odorico and Miller 1997); na relação entre as quatro das atuais classes de Medusozoa
(Hydrozoa, Scyphozoa, Cubozoa e Staurozoa); e entre os subgrupos de Hydrozoa e
ordens de Scyphozoa (Marques and Collins 2004; Dawson 2004; Collins et al. 2006;
Daly et al. 2007; Kayal et al. 2012; Kayal et al. 2013; Zapata et al. 2015).
Kayal et al. (2013) ampliaram a amostragem dos genomas mitocondriais já
apresentados para Cnidaria a fim de reavaliar as relações filogenéticas dentro do filo.
Suas análises, baseadas em dados de mitogenômica apoiaram relações já propostas,
9
como o monofiletismo do subfilo Medusozoa, das classes Cubozoa, Staurozoa e
Hydrozoa, da subclasse Discomedusae e das ordens Carybdeida e Chirodropida. Porém,
certos agrupamentos propostos anteriormente foram refutados como Scyphozoa uma
vez que Discomedusae se agrupa com Hydrozoa, e os demais grupos de Medusozoa que
não formam nenhum grupo observado em trabalhos anteriores. Embora os autores
apresentem a segunda filogenia mais atual de Cnidaria, esta ainda apresenta
inconsistências, levando os próprios a afirmarem que as relações mostradas entre os
diferentes táxons que compõem o filo são hipotéticas e sujeitas a testes. Deste modo,
estudos específicos nos diferentes grupos podem promover uma melhor compreensão
das relações entre os Cnidaria como um todo.
Existem aproximadamente 200 morfoespécies descritas de Scyphozoa ao redor
do mundo (Daly et al. 2007). Destas, 22 espécies são registradas no Brasil (Mianzan and
Cornelius 1999; Marques et al. 2003; Morandini et al. 2005) e 38 na Austrália
(Gershwin et al. 2010). A Classe Scyphozoa compreende dois grupos: as subclasses
Coronamedusae (ordem Coronatae) e Discomedusae (ordens Semaeostomeae e
Rhizostomeae) (Calder 2009). A classe distingue-se dos demais Medusozoa pela
presença da estrobilização, órgãos sensoriais marginais (ropálios) e o estágio de éfira
(Marques and Collins 2004; Collins et al. 2006; Daly et al. 2007).
Dentro de Cnidaria, a classe Cubozoa é a que possui menor número de espécies
descritas, 36 (Daly et al. 2007). As cubomedusas são nadadoras ágeis e extremamente
eficientes (Collins et al. 2011; Colin et al. 2013) caracterizadas por exibirem quatro
ropálios perradiais, contendo olhos complexos com ocelos, corpos vítreos, lentes,
córneas e retinas e, em cada um dos cantos da umbrela nota-se uma extensão espessa da
margem denominada pedálio (Pearse and Pearse 1978; Daly et al. 2007). A classe é
10
dividida em duas ordens Chirodropida e Carybdeida sendo que nesta última, cada
pedálio porta somente um único tentáculo (Bentlage and Lewis 2012).
No Brasil as espécies de Scyphozoa Lychnorhiza lucerna (Rhizostomeae) e,
Chrysaora lactea (Semaeostomeae) são abundantes (Morandini et al. 2005; Nogueira
Júnior et al. 2010). As cubomedusas Tamoya haplonema (Carybdeida) e Chiropsalmus
quandrumanus (Chirodropida) possuem abundância menor, mas são relativamente
comuns (Nogueira Júnior et al. 2010).
Na Austrália as espécies do gênero Cassiopea normalmente são encontrados
com a umbrella apoiada no substrato e a superficie oral para cima (Bigelow 1900;
Morandini et al. 2016b) e podem ser encontradas em Lizard Island lagoon e em
Vlashoff Cay (Cairns) (Templeman and Kingsford 2010; Templeman and Kingsford
2012). As cubozoas Carukia barnesi, Chironex fleckeri e Chiropselaa bronzie são
relativamente abundantes junto a Grande Barreira de Recifes de Coral em Queensland,
leste da Austrália (Williamson et al. 1996; Fenner and Hadok 2002; Tibballs 2006;
Gershwin and Kingsford 2008; Kingsford et al. 2012).
Ciclo de Vida, Reprodução sexuada e descrição do Sistema reprodutor masculino
O ciclo de vida metagenético ocorre em quatro das cinco classes de Cnidaria:
Hydrozoa, Scyphozoa, Cubozoa e Staurozoa (Bridge et al. 1995; Odorico and Miller
1997; Marques and Collins 2004; Morandini et al. 2016a). De um modo geral o ovo
fertilizado se desenvolve em uma larva plânula que ao assentar se diferencia em um
pólipo. O pólipo – estágio bentônico – se reproduz assexuadamente dando origem a
uma ou mais medusas livre-natantes dióicas, que quando adultas se reproduzem
sexuadamente (Morandini et al. 2014). Em Scyphozoa o pólipo é denominado cifístoma
e pode reproduzir-se assexuadamente originando outros pólipos (brotamento ou
11
formação de cistos) ou originar uma ou mais medusas jovens através de fissões
transversais (estrobilização) (Arai 1997; Adler and Jarms 2009). A estrobilização
tradicionalmente é caracterizada como sendo polidisco – com a formação de muitos
discos e várias medusas; ou monodisco – em que somente uma éfira é formada por vez
(Bigelow 1900; Morandini et al. 2004; Holst et al. 2007; Schiariti et al. 2008). As
ordens Coronatae e Semaeostomeae apresentam um padrão polidisco e Rhizostomeae
um padrão monodisco. No entanto, estudos sobre o ciclo de vida de algumas espécies
ressaltam que nem todos os membros de Rhizostomeae estrobilizam no padrão
monodisco e eram denominados polidisco (e.g. tabela 1 de Schiariti et al. 2008). Apesar
de o número de éfiras ser maior que um, ele pode ser considerado baixo (2-10). Com
isso alguns autores sugerem a utilização de um termo adicional para melhor definir esse
processo encontrado: oligodisco (Fuentes et al. 2011).
Dentro de Scyphozoa, das cerca de 200 espécies descritas, 49 tem seu ciclo de
vida conhecido (24,5%; Jarms 2010) e destes 47 são metagenéticos. O ciclo de vida de
L. lucerna, Cassiopea sp. e C. lactea seguem o padrão para Scyphozoa. A estrobilização
polidisco produz sempre três éfiras em L. lucerna e de 2 a 10 éfiras em C. lactea, e
sempre é monodisco em Cassiopea sp. (Bigelow 1900; Morandini et al. 2004; Schiariti
et al. 2008).
O ciclo de vida dos cubozoários T. haplonema e C. quadrumanus ainda não foi
descrito. Porém, para os cubozoários Chironex fleckeri e Carukia barnesi Southcott
(1956), Yamaguchi and Hartwick (1980) e Courtney et al. (2016) descrevem o ciclo de
vida enfatizando o padrão metagenético e evidenciando diferenças no processo
assexuado em que um pólipo se metamorfoseia em uma única cubomedusa (Werner
1973a; Werner 1973b; Werner 1975; Straehler-pohl and Jarms 2011).
12
O gonocorismo ocorre na maioria dos cifozoários (Berrill 1949) e Cubozoa é a
única classe exclusivamente gonocórica (Fautin 1992). No entanto, espécies de
cifomedusas como Chrysaora hysoscella e do gênero Cassiopea são conhecidas por
apresentarem hermafroditismo e gonocorismo (Berrill 1949; Hofmann and Hadfield
2002). Para a maioria dos cnidários dióicos, indivíduos de sexos diferentes são
macroscopicamente indistinguíveis, porém algumas características distintivas
relacionadas à diferenciação sexual podem estar presentes em indivíduos maduros: são
as próprias gônadas ou estruturas associadas a elas (Fautin 1992). Em alguns casos em
Scyphozoa e Cubozoa as gônadas podem ser diferenciadas quando maduras pela
coloração (Werner 1973a; Fautin 1992; Lucas and Reed 2010; Iguchi et al. 2010;
Schiariti et al. 2012). Na espécie L. lucerna os ovários normalmente possuem coloração
marrom claro ou escuro e os testículos coloração esbranquiçada ou esverdeada (Schiariti
et al. 2012). A espécie C. lactea apresenta variação na coloração gonadal podendo ser
esbranquiçada, marrom-amarelada ou rosa pálido (Morandini and Marques 2010), sem
evidenciar um padrão de cor por sexo. Para Cubozoa, Werner (1973b) afirma que as
colorações gonadais dos dois sexos diferem quando observadas através de finos tecidos
transparentes de algumas medusas.
O ‘órgão’ reprodutivo dos cnidários é descrito como um espaço preenchido com
células germinativas em desenvolvimento que migraram da endoderme ou ectoderme
para a mesogléia (Miller 1983). Para Scyphozoa, Anthozoa e Cubozoa o testículo é
originado de células intersticiais da gastoderme, as quais migram para o interior da
mesogléia originando os folículos testiculares. No interior dos folículos ocorrem os
processos de espermatogênese e espermiogênese, sendo os espermatozoides maduros
liberados (Conant 1898; Miller 1983; Harrison and Jamieson 1988). A classe
Scyphozoa apresenta duas estratégias de liberação dos espermatozoides: livres ou em
13
grupos e empacotados. Os espermatozoides livres são liberados na água via poro
localizado na gastroderme (Tiemann and Jarms 2010) ou por ruptura da parede do
folículo (Morandini and Silveira 2001; Ikeda et al. 2011). Os espermatozoides também
podem estar agrupados e serem liberados em pacotes (spermatozeugmata) (e.g.
Kikinger 1992). Em Cubozoa, são poucos os trabalhos abordando o processo de
espermatogênese e a estratégia de liberação do espermatozoide. Werner (1973b)
descreveu spermatozeugmata para a espécie T. cystophora e García-Rodriguez (2015)
para a espécie Alatina alata e alguns autores reportam a presença de espermatóforos em
Copula sivickisi (Hartwick 1991; Straehler-Pohl et al. 2014; Marques et al. 2015).
García-Rodriguez (2015) descreve o sistema reprodutor masculino de C. quadrumanus
e T. haplonema, caracterizando a estrutura gonadal macroscópica, a conformação geral
e o epitélio gonadal, porém não descreve o processo de espermatogênese para as
espécies do litoral brasileiro, uma vez que somente encontrou espécimes imaturos, não
sendo possível identificar todas as figuras celulares características do processo de
espermatogênese. Porém, reporta o tipo de estratégia de liberação para T. haplonema
(espécime de New Jersey) como sendo por ruptura do epitélio folicular.
Adicionalmente, a autora também descreve a morfologia gonadal para as cubomedusas
Morbakka virulenta, Alatina alata e Copula sivickisi, descrevendo a estratégia de
liberação dos espermatozoides e alguns aspectos reprodutivos para estas ultimas
espécies. Domo mesmo modo, Southcott (1956) descreve a organização gonadal para
Chironex fleckeri evidenciando certa sazonalidade graus de maturação gonadal.
Espermiotaxonomia
A espermiotaxonomia vem sendo utilizada como critério de suporte para
inferências filogenéticas por diversos autores em vários grupos dentro de Metazoa
14
(Franzén 1956) como Trematoda – Platyhelminthes (Jamieson and Daddow 1982),
Polychaeta e Oligochaeta – Annelida (Jamieson 1983; Rota and Lupetti 1997),
Decapoda – Crustacea (Jamieson 1994; Guinot et al. 1997; Benetti et al. 2008; Buranelli
and Mantelatto 2012) e Gastropoda e Bivalvia – Mollusca (Introíni et al. 2013; Giménez
2013). Em Cnidaria trabalhos como os de Miller (1983) e Harrison and Jamieson (1988)
apresentam, em sua revisão, a morfologia geral da ultraestrutura do espermatozoide de
todas as classes exceto Cubozoa.
Franzén (1956) propôs que há uma relação definida entre a morfologia do
espermatozoide e a biologia de fertilização. Porém o autor não faz uma descrição
ultraestrutural dos espermatozoides, sendo as comparações feitas com base em
observações em nível de microscopia de contraste de fase. De acordo com o autor foi
proposto que espermatozoides com cabeça arredondada, acrossomo esférico, peça
intermediária pequena, poucas (quatro) mitocôndrias, flagelos livres e longos, são
características “primitivas”. Este é geralmente associado com a ocorrência de
fertilização externa. Espermatozoides com morfologia da cabeça alongada e peça
intermediária com mitocôndrias em espiral são classificados como modificados, sendo
associados à fecundação interna. Porém, Rouse and Pitt (2000) citam que, em Cnidaria,
talvez esta relação esteja equivocada, uma vez que vários espermatozoides que se
enquadram na morfologia “primitiva” apresentam fecundação interna ou vice-versa.
No nível de microscopia de luz pode-se observar a morfologia geral do
espermatozoide de Cnidaria é composto por cabeça redonda-ovalada, cônica ou
alongada, peça intermediária visível com um flagelo ancorado à parte posterior (Franzén
1956; Harrison and Jamieson 1988). Já ao microscópio eletrônico de transmissão
observa-se certa simetria na cabeça do espermatozoide, com a presença do núcleo e de
pequenas vesículas situadas na região anterior deste, que podem ser precursoras da
15
vesícula acrossomal existente nos espermatozoides da maioria dos metazoários (Hinsch
and Clark Jr. 1973; Hinsch 1974; Miller 1983; Harrison and Jamieson 1988). A peça
intermediária é pequena geralmente com quatro ou mais mitocôndrias ao redor de um
par de centríolos, o proximal e o distal. É a partir do centríolo distal que se origina o
longo flagelo típico no espermatozoide da maioria dos metazoários, contendo o arranjo
usual de microtúbulos (9 + 2) e vários elementos acessórios, compondo o axonema
(Miller 1983; Harrison and Jamieson 1988; Corbelli et al. 2003).
De acordo com Harrison and Jamieson (1988) são poucas as informações
ultraestruturais do espermatozoide em Cnidaria sendo a maioria dos estudos realizados
nas classes Anthozoa (97 espécies) e Hydrozoa (31 espécies). Em Scyphozoa o autor
informa sobre a descrição ultraestrutural de espermatozoides de nove espécies,
incluindo um da ordem Coronatae, cinco da ordem Semaeostomeae e três
Rhizostomeae. Porém, atualmente sabe-se que esse número aumentou para pelo menos
12 espécies incluindo cinco Rhizostomeae, cinco Semaeostomeae e dois Coronatae
(Afzelius and Franzén 1971; Hinsch and Clark Jr. 1973; Hinsch 1974; Rouse and Pitt
2000). Para Cubozoa, Werner (1973a) faz uma descrição generalizada do
espermatozoide de Trypedalia cystophora e Corbelli et al. (2003) descrevem a
ultraestrutura do espermatozoide de Carybdea marsupialis, sendo somente estes dois
trabalhos referentes a classe.
Em Discomedusae, o espermatozoide é caracterizado por apresentar núcleo
cônico alongado, pequenas vesículas eletrondensas na cabeça e peça intermediária
sempre com quatro mitocôndrias, centríolos proximal e distal, sendo o último com
complexo pericentriolar formando um colar que envolve a porção proximal do flagelo.
A ordem Coronatae compartilha certos caracteres com Discomedusae como, por
16
exemplo, organelas idênticas na peça intermediária, mas destaca-se pela presença de um
núcleo cônico relativamente pequeno (Harrison and Jamieson 1988).
Ainda que sejam poucos os trabalhos em Cubozoa, Corbelli et al. (2003)
ressaltam possíveis autapomorfias do espermatozoide de Cubozoa como a presença de
processos intersecundários, a forma do apêndice “spur” que forma o aparato
pericentriolar, e a forma dos processos pericentriolares terciários. Porém, os próprios
autoes evidenciam que os espermatozoides de Cubozoa são parecidos com os de
Scyphozoa e Hydrozoa.
Apesar de a abordagem utilizada nesta dissertação ser a mesma para as
diferentes espécies de medusas estudadas, o detalhamento metodológico não pode ser o
mesmo para todas elas. Além disso optou-se para apresentar o texto como se fossem
artigos independentes e em formato para serem submetidos para publicação. Dessa
forma, a dissertação encontra-se dividida em 4 capítulos, a saber, Capítulo 1:
“Spermatogenesis in the cubozoans Tamoya haplonema Müller, 1859 and
Chiropsalmus quadrumanus (Müller, 1859), highlighting the gonadal cycle”,
Capítulo 2: “Spermatogenesis and sperm morphology in cubozoans from SE
Brazilian and Australian coasts”, Capítulo 3: “Histochemistry and ultrastructure
of spermatogesis in Lychnorhiza lucerna, Chrysaora lactea and Cassiopea sp.” e
Capítulo 4 “Considerações Finais”.
No Capítulo 1 descrevemos o processo de espermatogênese para os cubozoários
Tamoya haplonema e Chiropsalmus quadrumanus com base nos resultados obtidos
através da análise histológica e histoquímica. Adicionalmente, utilizando como base as
amostras gonadais em diferentes estágios de maturação gonadal, foi possível
descrevermos os diferentes estágios do ciclo gonadal dessas espécies, sendo esse o
primeiro registro detalhado nesse nível para a classe.
17
No Capítulo 2 é descrito o processo de espermatogênese utilizando técnicas
histológicas, histoquímicas e ultraestruturais para as espécies de Cubozoa Tamoya
haplonema e Chiropsalmus quadrumanus do Brasil, além das espécies Carukia barnesi,
Chironex fleckeri e Chiropsella bronzie coletadas na Austrália.
No Capítulo 3 descrevemos de modo comparativo o processo de
espermatogênese nas espécies Lychnorhiza lucerna, Cassiopea sp. e Chrysaora lactea
com base em análises histológicas, histoquímicas e ultraestruturais da gônada
masculina. Adicionalmente, também incluímos neste manuscrito a descrição
macroscópica da gônada masculina de Lychnohiza lucerna, bem como sua disposição
dentro da cavidade gastrovascular, complementando resultados previamente publicados
por Schiariti et al. (2012).
Ao final, o Capítulo 4 apresenta as considerações finais desta dissertação
comparando os dados da morfologia gonadal, histológicos e histoquímicos das espécies
de Cubozoa e Scyphozoa aqui estudadas (exemplares do Brasil e Austrália). Finalmente,
os dados descritivos do espermatozoide de todas as espécies trabalhadas forma
compilados e comparados ressaltando possíveis sinapomorfias.
Referências
Adler L, Jarms G (2009) New insights into reproductive traits of scyphozoans: special
methods of propagation in Sanderia malayensis GOETTE, 1886 (Pelagiidae,
Semaeostomeae) enable establishing a new classification of asexual reproduction
in the class Scyphozoa. Mar Biol 156:1411–1420. doi: 10.1007/s00227-009-1181-
6
Afzelius BA, Franzén A (1971) The Spermatozoon of the Jellyfish Nausithoe. J
Ultrastruct Res 37:186–199.
Arai MN (1997) A Functional Biology of Scyphozoa. Chapman & Hall, London
18
Benetti AS, Santos DC, Negreiros-Fransozo ML, Scelzo MA (2008) Spermatozoal
ultrastructure in three species of the genus Uca Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Brachyura,
Ocypodidae). Micron 39:337–343. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2007.04.004
Bentlage B, Lewis C (2012) An illustrated key and synopsis of the families and genera
of carybdeid box jellyfishes (Cnidaria: Cubozoa: Carybdeida), with emphasis on
the “Irukandji family” (Carukiidae). J Nat Hist 46:2595–2620. doi:
10.1080/00222933.2012.717645
Berrill NJ (1949) Developmental analysis of scyphomedusae. Biol Rev 24:393–409.
Bigelow RP (1900) The anatomy and development of Cassiopea xamachana. Mem
Bost Soc Nat Hist 5:192–254.
Bridge D, Cunningham CW, DeSalle R, Buss LW (1995) Class-level relationships in
the phylum Cnidaria: molecular and morphological evidence. Mol Biol Evol
12:679–689.
Bridge D, Cunningham CW, Schierwater B, et al (1992) Class-level relationships in the
phylum Cnidaria: Evidence from mitochondrial genome structure. Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A 89:8750–8753.
Buranelli R, Mantelatto F (2012) Reproductive apparatus of the male giant hermit crab
Petrochirus diogenes (Anomura, Diogenidae): morphology and phylogenetic
implications. Aquat Biol 16:241–251. doi: 10.3354/ab00453
Calder DR (2009) Cubozoan and Scyphozoan jellyfishes of the Carolinian
biogeographic province, southeastern USA. Royal Ontario Museum Contributions
in Science, Toronto
Colin SP, Costello JH, Katija K, et al (2013) Propulsion in Cubomedusae: Mechanisms
and Utility. PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056393
Collins A, Schuchert P, Marques A, et al (2006) Medusozoan Phylogeny and Character
19
Evolution Clarified by New Large and Small Subunit rDNA Data and an
Assessment of the Utility of Phylogenetic Mixture Models. Syst Biol 55:97–115.
doi: 10.1080/10635150500433615
Collins AG (2002) Phylogeny of Medusozoa and the evolution of cnidarian life cycles.
J Evol Biol 15:418–432.
Collins AG (2009) Recent Insights into Cnidarian Phylogeny. Smithson Contrib to Mar
Sci 38:139–149.
Collins AG, Bentlage B, Gillan W, et al (2011) Naming the bonaire banded box jelly,
Tamoya ohboya, n. sp. (Cnidaria: Cubozoa: Carybdeida: Tamoyidae). Zootaxa
2753:53–68. doi: 10.11646/%25x
Conant FS (1898) The cubomedusae. Johns Hopkins University
Corbelli A, Avian M, Marotta R, Ferraguti M (2003) The spermatozoon of Carybdea
marsupialis (Cubozoa, Cnidaria). Invertebr Reprod Dev 43:95–104. doi:
10.1080/07924259.2003.9652528
Courtney R, Browning S, Seymour J (2016) Early Life History of the “Irukandji”
Jellyfish Carukia barnesi. PLoS One 11:e0151197. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0151197
Daly M, Brugler MR, Cartwright P, et al (2007) The phylum Cnidaria: A review of
phylogenetic patterns and diversity 300 years after Linnaeus. Zootaxa 1668:127–
182.
Dawson MN (2004) Some implications of molecular phylogenetics for understanding
biodiversity in jellyfishes, with emphasis on Scyphozoa. Hydrobiologia 530–
531:249–260. doi: 10.1007/s10750-004-2659-3
Fautin DG (1992) Cnidaria. In: Adiyodi KG, Adiyodi RG (eds) Reproductive Biology
of Invertebrates (Sexual Differentiation and Behaviour). pp 31–52
20
Fenner PJ, Hadok JC (2002) Fatal envenomation by jellyfish causing Irukandji
syndrome. Med J Aust 177:362–363.
Franzén A (1956) On spermiogenesis. morphology of the spermatozoon, and biology of
fertilization among invertebrates. Zool Bidr Uppsala 31:355–482.
Fuentes V, Straehler-Pohl I, Atienza D, et al (2011) Life cycle of the jellyfish
Rhizostoma pulmo (Scyphozoa: Rhizostomeae) and its distribution, seasonality and
inter-annual variability along the Catalan coast and the Mar Menor (Spain, NW
Mediterranean). Mar Biol 158:2247–2266. doi: 10.1007/s00227-011-1730-7
García-Rodriguez J (2015) Anatomia associada ao comportamento reprodutivo de
Cubozoa. Universidade de São Paulo
Gershwin L, Kingsford MJ (2008) Pelagic Cnidaria and Ctenophora. In: Hutchings P,
Kingsford M, Hoegh-Guldberg O (eds) he Great Barrier Reef: Biology,
Environment and Management. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp 188–198
Gershwin L, Zeidler W, Davie PJF (2010) Medusae (Cnidaria) of Moreton Bay,
Queensland, Australia. Mem Queensl Museum 54:47–108.
Giménez J (2013) Spermatogenesis and sperm morphology in Trophon geversianus
(Gastropoda: Muricidae). J Mar Biol Assoc United Kingdom 93:1881–1886. doi:
10.1017/S0025315413000581
Guinot D, Jamieson BGM, Tudge CC (1997) Ultrastructure and relantionships of
spermatozoa of the freshwater crabs Potamon fluviatile and Potamon ibericum
(Crustacea, Brachyura, Potamidae). J Zool 241:229–244.
Harrison PL, Jamieson B (1988) Cnidaria and Ctenophora. In: Adiyodi KG, Adiyod RG
(eds) Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates. Vol IX Part A, Progress in Male
Gamete Ultrastructure and Phylogeny. Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 21–95
Hartwick RF (1991) Observations on the anatomy, behavior, reproduction and life-cycle
21
of the cubozoan Carybdea sivickisi. Hydrobiologia 216/217:171–179. doi:
10.1007/978-94-011-3240-4
Hinsch GW (1974) Comparative ultrastructure of cnidarian sperm. Am Zool 14:457–
465. doi: 10.1093/icb/14.2.457
Hinsch GW, Clark Jr. WH (1973) Comparative fine structure of Cnidaria spermatozoa.
Biol Reprod 8:62–73.
Hofmann DK, Hadfield MG (2002) Hermaphroditism, gonochorism, and asexual
reproduction in Cassiopea sp.—an immigrant in the islands of Hawai’i. Invertebr
Reprod Dev 41:215–221. doi: 10.1080/07924259.2002.9652754
Holst S, Sötje I, Tiemann H, Jarms G (2007) Life cycle of the rhizostome jellyfish
Rhizostoma octopus (L.) (Scyphozoa, Rhizostomeae), with studies on cnidocysts
and statoliths. Mar Biol 151:1695–1710. doi: 10.1007/s00227-006-0594-8
Iguchi N, Lee HE, Yoon WD, Kim S (2010) Reproduction of the giant jellyfish,
Nemopilema nomurai (Scyphozoa: Rhizostomeae), in 2006–2008 as peripherally-
transported populations. Ocean Sci J 45:129–138. doi: 10.1007/s12601-010-0011-6
Ikeda H, Ohtsu K, Uye S (2011) Structural changes of gonads during artificially
induced gametogenesis and spawning in the giant jellyfish Nemopilema nomurai
(Scyphozoa: Rhizostomeae). J Mar Biol Assoc United Kingdom 91:215–227. doi:
10.1017/S0025315410001244
Introíni GO, Passos FD, Recco-Pimentel SM (2013) Comparative study of sperm
ultrastructure of Donax hanleyanus and Donax gemmula (Bivalvia: Donacidae).
Acta Zool 94:261–266. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-6395.2012.00565.x
Jamieson BGM (1983) The ultrastructure of the spermatozoon of the oligochaetoid
polychaete Questa sp. (Questidae, Annelida) and its phylogenetic significance. J
Ultrasructure Res 84:238–251. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5320(83)80004-5
22
Jamieson BGM (1994) Phylogeny of the Brachyura with Particular Reference to the
Podotremata: Evidence from a Review of Spermatozoal Ultrastructure (Crustacea,
Decapoda). Philos Trans R Soc Biol Sci 345:373–393. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0116
Jamieson BGM, Daddow LM (1982) The ultrastructure of the spermatozoon of
Neochasmus sp. (Cryptogonimidae, Digenea, Trematoda) and its phylogenetic
significance. Int J Parasitol 12:547–559. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(82)90051-0
Jarms G (2010) The early life history of Scyphozoa with emphasis on Coronatae: a
review with a list of described Life cycles. Verh Naturwiss Ver Hambg 45:17–31.
Kayal E, Bentlage B, Collins AG, et al (2012) Evolution of Linear Mitochondrial
Genomes in Medusozoan Cnidarians. Genome Biol Evol 4:1–12. doi:
10.1093/gbe/evr123
Kayal E, Roure B, Philippe H, et al (2013) Cnidarian phylogenetic relationships as
revealed by mitogenomics. BMC Evol Biol 13:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-5
Kikinger R (1992) Cotylorhiza tuberculata (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa) - Life History of a
stationary population. Mar Ecol 13:333–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-
0485.1992.tb00359.x
Kingsford MJ, Seymour JE, O’Callaghan MD (2012) Abundance patterns of cubozoans
on and near the Great Barrier Reef. Hydrobiologia 690:257–268. doi:
10.1007/s10750-012-1041-0
Lucas CH, Reed AJ (2010) Gonad morphology and gametogenesis in the deep-sea
jellyfish Atolla wyvillei and Periphylla periphylla ( Scyphozoa : Coronatae )
collected from Cape Hatteras and the Gulf of Mexico. J Mar Biol Assoc United
Kingdom 90:1095–1104. doi: 10.1017/S0025315409000824
Marques AC, Collins AG (2004) Cladistic analysis of Medusozoa and cnidarian
evolution. Invertebr Biol 123:23–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7410.2004.tb00139.x
23
Marques AC, García J, Lewis Ames C (2015) Internal fertilization and sperm storage in
cnidarians: a response to Orr and Brennan. Trends Ecol Evol 30:435–436. doi:
10.1016/j.tree.2015.06.002
Marques AC, Morandini AC, Migotto AE (2003) Synopsis of knowledge on Cnidaria
Medusozoa from Brazil. Biota Neotrop 3:1–18.
Mianzan HW, Cornelius PFS (1999) Cubomedusae and Scyphomedusae. In:
Boltovskoy D (ed) South Atlantic Zooplankton Vol 1. Backhuys Publishers,
Leiden, pp 513–559
Miller RL (1983) Cnidaria. In: Adiyodi KG, Adiyodi RG (eds) Reproductive Biology of
Invertebrates. Vol II Spermatogenesis and Sperm Function. Wiley & Sons, New
York, pp 23–69
Morandini AC, Ascher D, Stampar SN, Ferreira JF V. (2005) Cubozoa e Scyphozoa
(Cnidaria: Medusozoa) de águas costeiras do Brasil. Iheringia Série Zool 95:281–
294. doi: 10.1590/S0073-47212005000300008
Morandini AC, Custódio MR, Marques AC (2014) Phylum Porifera and Cnidaria. In:
Gopalakrishnakone P, Haddad V, Kem WR, et al. (eds) Marine and Freshwater
Toxins. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 1–24
Morandini AC, Marques AC (2010) Revision of the genus Chrysaora Péron & Lesueur,
1810 (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa). Zootaxa 2464:1–97.
Morandini AC, Schiariti A, Stampar SN, et al (2016a) Succession of generations is still
the general paradigm for scyphozoan life cycles. Bull Mar Sci 92:343–351. doi:
10.5343/bms.2016.1018
Morandini AC, Silveira FL Da (2001) Sexual reproduction of Nausithoe aurea
(Scyphozoa, Coronatae). Gametogenesis, egg release, embryonic development, and
gastrulation*. Sci Mar 65:139–149. doi: 10.3989/scimar.2001.65n2139
24
Morandini AC, Silveira FL da, Jarms G (2004) The life cycle of Chrysaora lactea
Eschscholtz, 1829 (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) with notes on the scyphistoma stage of
three other species. Hydrobiologia 530–531:347–354. doi: 10.1007/s10750-004-
2694-0
Morandini AC, Stampar SN, Maronna MM, Da Silveira FL (2016b) All non-indigenous
species were introduced recently? The case study of Cassiopea (Cnidaria:
Scyphozoa) in Brazilian waters. J Mar Biol Assoc United Kingdom in press:1–8.
doi: 10.1017/S0025315416000400
Nogueira Júnior M, Nagata RM, Haddad MA (2010) Seasonal variation of
macromedusae (Cnidaria) at North Bay, Florianópolis, southern Brazil. Zool
(Curitiba, Impresso) 27:377–386. doi: 10.1590/S1984-46702010000300009
Odorico DM, Miller DJ (1997) Internal and external relationships of the Cnidaria:
implications of primary and predicted secondary structure of the 5 ’ −end of the
23S−like rDNA. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 264:77–82. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0011
Pearse JS, Pearse VB (1978) Vision in Cubomedusan Jellyfishes Published by :
American Association for the Advancement of Science Stable URL :
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1745820 Vision in Cubomedusan Jellyfishes. Science
(80- ) 199:458.
Reft AJ, Daly M (2012) Morphology, distribution, and evolution of apical structure of
nematocysts in hexacorallia. J Morphol 273:121–136. doi: 10.1002/jmor.11014
Rota E, Lupetti P (1997) An ultrastructural investigation of Hrabeiella Pizl &
Chalupský, 1984 (Annelida). II. The spermatozoon. Tissue Cell 29:603–609. doi:
10.1016/S0040-8166(97)80061-4
Rouse GW, Pitt K (2000) Ultrastructure of the sperm of Catostylus mosaicus and
Phyllorhiza punctata (Scyphozoa , Cnidaria): Implications for sperm terminology
25
and the inference of reproductive mechanisms. Invertebr Reprod Dev 38:23–34.
Schiariti A, Christiansen E, Morandini AC, et al (2012) Reproductive biology of
Lychnorhiza lucerna (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa: Rhizostomeae): Individual traits
related to sexual reproduction. Mar Biol Res 8:255–264. doi:
10.1080/17451000.2011.616897
Schiariti A, Kawahara M, Uye S, Mianzan HW (2008) Life cycle of the jellyfish
Lychnorhiza lucerna (Scyphozoa: Rhizostomeae). Mar Biol 156:1–12. doi:
10.1007/s00227-008-1050-8
Schuchert P (1993) Phylogenetic analysis of the Cnidaria. J Zool Syst Evol Res 31:161–
173.
Southcott RV (1956) Studies on Australian Cubomedusae, including a new genus and
species apparently harmful to man. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 7:254–283.
Straehler-Pohl I, Garm A, Morandini AC (2014) Sexual dimorphism in Tripedaliidae
(Conant 1897) (Cnidaria, Cubozoa, Carybdeida). Zootaxa 3785:533. doi:
10.11646/zootaxa.3785.4.3
Straehler-pohl I, Jarms G (2011) Morphology and life cycle of Carybdea morandinii,
sp. nov. (Cnidaria), a cubozoan with zooxanthellae and peculiar polyp anatomy.
Zootaxa 2755:36–56.
Templeman MA, Kingsford MJ (2010) Trace element accumulation in Cassiopea sp.
(Scyphozoa) from urban marine environments in Australia. Mar Environ Res
69:63–72. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2009.08.001
Templeman MA, Kingsford MJ (2012) Variation in soft tissue chemistry among
scyphozoan and cubozoan jellyfishes from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia.
Hydrobiologia 690:279–290. doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-1051-y
Tibballs J (2006) Australian venomous jellyfish, envenomation syndromes, toxins and
26
therapy. Toxicon 48:830–859. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.07.020
Tiemann H, Jarms G (2010) Organ-like gonads, complex oocyte formation, and long-
term spawning in Periphylla periphylla (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa, Coronatae). Mar
Biol 157:527–535. doi: 10.1007/s00227-009-1338-3
Werner B (1975) Bau und Lebensgeschte des Polypen von Tripedalia cystophora
(Cubozoa, class. nov., Carybdeidae) und seine Bedeutung für die Evolution der
Cnidaria. Helgoländer wiss Meeresunters 27:461–504.
Werner B (1973a) New Investigations on Systematics and Evolution of the Class
Scyphozoa and the Phylum Cnidaria. Publ Seto Mar Biol Lab 20:35–61. doi:
10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Werner B (1973b) Spermatozeugmen und Paarungsverhalten bei Tripedalia cystophora
(Cubomedusae). Mar Biol 18:212–217. doi: 10.1007/BF00367987
Williamson JA, Fenner PJ, Burnett JW, Rifkin JF (1996) Venomous & Poisonous
Marine Animals: A Medical and Biological Handbook. Surf Life Saving Australia
and University of New South Wales Press, Sydney
Yamaguchi M, Hartwick R (1980) Early Life history of the sea wasp, Chironex fleckeri
(Class Cubozoa). In: Tardent P, Tardent R (eds) Development and cellular biology
of coelenterates. Elsevier, Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp 11–16
Zapata F, Goetz FE, Smith SA, et al (2015) Phylogenomic Analyses Support Traditional
Relationships within Cnidaria. PLoS One 1–13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139068
27
Capítulo 1
Spermatogenesis in the cubozoans Tamoya haplonema Müller, 1859 and
Chiropsalmus quadrumanus (Müller, 1859), highlighting the gonadal cycle
Gisele R. Tiseo1*
; Jimena Garcia-Rodriguez1; Fernando J. Zara
2; Cheryl Lewis
Ames3,4
; Antonio C. Marques1,5
& André C. Morandini1
1 Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, R.
Matão trav. 14, n.101, 05508-090, São Paulo, Brazil;
2 Departamento de Biologia Aplicada, Invertebrate Morphology Laboratory (IML),
Aquaculture Center (CAUNESP) and Instituto de Estudos Avançados do Mar
(IEAMar), Univ. Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Via de Acesso Prof. Donato Castellane,
S/N, Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil;
3 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History,
Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, 20013-7012, USA;
4 BEES Concentration, Biological Sciences Graduate Program, University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742, USA;
5 Centro de Biologia Marinha, Universidade de São Paulo, Manoel Hypólito do Rego,
km. 131.5, 11600-000, São Sebastião, Brazil.
Running Title: Spermatogenesis of cubozoans from SE Brazil
*Corresponding author. Tel: +55 11 30917621
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (G.R. Tiseo), [email protected] (J.
García), [email protected] (F. J. Zara), [email protected] (C. Lewis),
[email protected] (A.C. Marques), [email protected] (A.C. Morandini)
28
Abstract
The spermatogenesis was little studied in cubozoans. Here we describe the
spermatogenesis of two Brazilian species Chiropsalmus quadrumanus and Tamoya
haplonema under light microscopy and histochemical techniques. Additionally, we
highlight aspects and stages of the gonadal cycle. Specimens were collected by hand at
the water surface or with shrimp trawls in three areas of São Paulo state (SE Brazil):
Cananéia lagoon estuarine system (south), Santos and São Vicente Bay (central), and
São Sebastião and Ubatuba (north). Samples of male gonad were excised, fixed in
paraformaldehyde 4% in sodium phosphate buffer 0,2M (pH 7, 2) by 24 hours and
posteriorly processed following protocol for historesin. The serial sections were
performed and the resulting slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and
techniques for proteins (mercuric bromophenol blue and ponceau xylidine), acids
materials (toluidine blue) and neutral polysaccharides (PAS). Male box jellyfish gonads
are located between the mesoglea and gastrodermis in a thin and independent layer,
organized in elongated follicles, macroscopically resembling a fingerprint pattern. The
follicle wall is composed of spermatogonia. The spermatocytes are found near the
follicle wall while spermatids and spermatozoa are located at the center. Sperm release
occurs through rupture of follicular wall in both species. We documented four gonadal
maturation stages for T. haplonema, viz. rudimentary, developing, mature, and spawned;
and three stages for C. quadrumanus, viz. rudimentary, developing, and mature. The
sperm of C. quadrumanus has a rounded head while T. haplonema has a conical shape
with an elongated projection. In both species there was no positive histochemical
reaction for the vesicles precursors of acrosome.
Key-words: Cnidaria, Cubozoa, histology, histochemistry, jellyfish.
29
Introduction
The class Cubozoa is the one with less number of described species among the
phylum Cnidaria, totaling approximately 50 species (Bentlage et al. 2010). The class is
divided in two monophyletic orders, Chirodropida and Carybdeida, whereas in the last
one, each umbranched pedalium have only one tentacle (Daly et al. 2007; Bentlage and
Lewis 2012). In Brazil there are four species of cubozoans (Mianzan and Cornelius
1999; Marques et al. 2003). The target species of this study – Tamoya haplonema
(Family Tamoyidae, Order Carybdeida) and Chiropsalmus quadrumanus (Family
Chiropsalmidae, Order Chirodropida) – are broadly distributed at the Western Atlantic
coast (Mianzan and Cornelius 1999; Migotto et al. 2002; Nagata et al. 2009).
There are some works addressing reproductive aspects of Cubozoa (Werner
1973a; Harrison and Jamieson 1988; García-Rodriguez 2015), being most of them
related to the description of life cycle, fertilization and strategies of release of gametes
(free in the water column, grouped or packed), mating behavior or gonadal macroscopic
description (Avian et al., 1993; Bentlage et al., 2010; Conant, 1898; Corbelli et al.,
2003; García-Rodriguez, 2015; Garm et al., 2015; Gershwin, 2006; Lewis and Long,
2005; Lewis et al., 2013, 2008; Marques et al., 2015; Müller, 1860; Southcott, 1956;
Straehler-Pohl et al., 2014; Thiel, 1936; Toshino et al., 2013; Werner, 1973a, 1973b).
Of all these works, Müller (1860), Thiel (1936) and Lewis and Long (2005) described
the histological structure of female gonad, and Thiel (1936), Southcott (1956), Avian et
al.(1993), Garm et al. (2015) and García-Rodriguez (2015) described the histological
structure of the male gonad (see Table 1 for details). Among Cubozoa, the
spermatogenesis was described only for few species given the difficulty in find males at
different stages of gonadal development as in Avian et al. (1993); Claus (1878) and
Southcott (1956). However a degree of gonadal maturity was already observed – as in
Chironex fleckeri Southcott (1956) and Carybdea xaymacana Conant (1898).
30
Cubozoa is a exclusively gonochoric class (Fautin 1992) and the gonads can be
differentiated by the color (Werner 1973b; Fautin 1992; Lewis and Long 2005;
Bentlage et al. 2010; Bentlage and Lewis 2012) and through the identification of a
pattern similar to a “fingerprint” (observed only in males) (Southcott 1956; Gershwin
2005). According to Gershwin (2005), all cubozoans have paired leaf-like lateral
gonads, that sometimes could overlap, and sometimes could be highly pleated. In most
carybdeids the gonads are attached along the length of the septum, having a butterfly
appearance in the tripedaliids (Gershwin 2005). In most chirodropids the lateral gonads
are broader and more developed in the upper half, and eventually the gonadal tissue
could envelop the gastric saccules – named superior gonads by Southcott (1956), and
perradial stomach pouches by Mayer (1910).
In a general way, the male gonad is originated of interstitial cells from the
gastrodermis, which migrate to the mesoglea differentiating and originating the male
follicles (Miller 1983). Inside these follicles occurs the spermatogenesis, and the sperm
release occurs in the water column by rupture of the follicle wall or transferred, in
packages (spermatozeugmata or spermatophores) to the female through mating behavior
(Conant 1898; Miller 1983; Harrison and Jamieson 1988; Lewis and Long 2005; Lewis
et al. 2008; Garm et al. 2015; Marques et al. 2015).
This work describes the spermatogenesis and the gross morphology of the sperm,
under light microscopy, for two species of different orders and families of box-
jellyfishes, viz. Chiropsalmus quadrumanus (Family Chiropsalmidae, Order
Chirodropida) and Tamoya haplonema (Family Tamoyidae, Order Carybdeida),
characterizing histochemically the sperm composition and gonadal tissues at different
degrees of gonadal maturation.
31
Material and Methods
Specimens of T. haplonema and C. quadrumanus were collected in four localities
of São Paulo state (SE Brazil) – viz. Cananéia lagoon estuarine system, Santos and São
Vicente Bay, São Sebastião and Ubatuba counties (Figure 1) – in the years 2009, 2010,
2012, 2014, and 2015 (Table 2). The exemplars were collected by hand at water surface
or with shrimp trawls, the specimens were transported alive to the laboratory in plastic
boxes and identified following Morandini et al. (2005). Samples of male gonad1 of six
individuals of each species were fixed in paraformaldehyde 4% in sodium phosphate
buffer 0,2M (pH 7,2) for 24hours. After the fixation, the samples were buffered for
more 24 hours, dehydrated in ethanol series (70-95%), embedded and included in
historesin glycolmethacrylate Leica®
. Serial cuts of 3 to 5 µm were carried in rotative
microtome and the slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to traditional
histological description (Junqueira and Junqueira 1983), avoiding the ethanol and
xylene baths (Sant’Anna et al. 2010; Zara et al. 2012).The toluidine blue staining (AZT)
(Modificade de Audino et al. 2015) was used to describe spermatogenesis, the mercuric
bromophenol blue (AB) (Pearse 1960) and ponceau xylidine (Mello and Vidal 1980) to
demonstrate total proteins, and the Periodic acid of Schiff-Hematoxylin (PAS-H)
technique to demonstrate neutral polysaccharides with the groups 1-2-glycol (Junqueira
and Junqueira 1983).
To study and measure the germ cells at different spermatogenesis stages we used
preparations stained with H&E of 6 different males. In each preparation it was measured
30 nuclei of each cell type (spermatogonia, spermatocyte, spermatid and sperm) when
present. The nuclear measurements were made using the Leica® Microscope and the
software IM50 from the Laboratório de Morfologia de Invertebrados (UNESP-
1 Even the Cnidarians being the first animals with tissue organization, no exhibiting separate reproductive organs,
here we use the term “gonad” to refer to the places where the gametogenesis occurs, following Campbell (1974);
Marques and Collins (2004); Morandini and Marques (2010); Bentlage et al. (2010) and Straehler-Pohl et al. (2014).
32
Jaboticabal) and also the Nikon Eclipse 80i® Microscope from the Laboratório de
Cultivo e Estudos de Cnidaria (Instituto de Biociências, USP), using the software NIS-
Elements®, with the appropriate calibration to the lens used (Zara et al. 2012). Mean and
standard deviation of measurements were tested for normality by the Kolmogorov-
Smirnov test. Means were compared via the Dunn method (p ≤ 0.05) always when the
Kruskal-Wallis test, to heterocedastic data, indicated differences between the stages of
development and size of the germ cells.
Results
General histological morphology
The general morphology of the cubozoan male gonad is illustrated in Figure 2,
being this schematic draw done based in the histological micrographs presented below.
In both species the four male gonads are composed of a pair of hemigonads: a thin and
laminar tissue layer located between the mesoglea and gastrodermis, and is composed of
several follicles surrounded by an epithelium of gastrodermal origin. In longitudinal
section the follicles are elongated structures contiguous and juxtaposed one to another,
characterizing the pattern similar to a "fingerprint" (Fig. 2A). The gastrodermal
epithelium has cells with elongated nuclei and cytoplasm with large vesicles (Fig. 2B).
Spermatogenesis in Tamoya haplonema (Order Carybdeida, Family Tamoyidae)
The male gonad of T. haplonema is composed of several follicles surrounded by a
gastrodermal epithelium (Fig. 3A), and spermatogenesis occurs inside these male
follicles (Fig. 3A). The follicular epithelium is composed of spermatogonia organized in
just one layer of juxtaposed cells (Fig. 3B) or in more layers (Fig. 3C). The
spermatocytes have rounded nucleus with condensed chromatin (Fig. 3D, F). During
spermiogenesis, the spermatids reduce the cytoplasmic volume turning into sperm (Fig.
33
3E-F). The cells of the gastrodermal epithelium have an irregular shape containing
vesicles not stained by any of the histochemical techniques used (Fig. 3C-D, F).
During spermatogenesis process, it was observed differences between the nuclear
sizes of the different cellular types (Kruskal-Wallis test: H= 142.852; P < 0.0001, Fig.
4). The spermatogonia are cells with elongated nucleus (mean 6.1 ± 1.5µm), well
developed (Fig. 3B) and reactive to toluidine blue stain (Fig. 3D). The spermatocytes
have basophilic nucleus (Fig. 3F), are smaller than the spermatogonia (3.3 ± 1.4µm)
(Dunn test: z = 7.709; p <0.05) and intensely stained by toluidine blue (Fig. 3D).
Between spermatocytes and spermatids, there was significant reduction of the nuclear
diameter (Dunn test: z= 2.8638, p<0.05).
The spermiogenesis begins with the spermatids, which has basophilic, rounded
nucleus (2.6 ± 0.4 µm), showing a homogeneous chromatin stained (Fig. 3F). Among
spermatids and sperm, there was no reduction of the nuclear size (Dunn test: z = 1.4936;
p< 0.05). The mature sperm have an elongated conic head (Fig. 3E-G). Due to genetic
material compaction, the nucleus becomes slightly smaller (2.4 ± 0.5µm), being
strongly reactive to proteins (Fig. 3H). The anterior portion of the sperm head and the
flagellum of T. haplonema are negative to PAS-H stain (Fig. 3I). The mature sperm are
released by rupture of the follicle wall (Fig. 3H-I).
The gonadal cycle of T. haplonema can be divided in four stages of maturation
(Fig. 5): rudimentary, intermediate, mature and spawned. The rudimentary stage is
characterized by follicles with just the initial stages of spermatogenesis like
spermatogonia and spermatocytes (Fig. 5A). At the intermediate stage the follicles are
filled with few spermatids between the spermatocytes (Fig. 5B). The mature gonad is
characterized by the presence of spermatogonia and sperm inside the follicle (Fig. 5C-
D). Once the sperm is released, the male gonad starts a new cycle of sperm production,
34
characterizing the spawned stage (Fig. 5E and F). In this last stage, it can be noted the
presence of empty spaces and a large number of spermatogonia inside the follicle (Fig.
5F).
Spermatogenesis in Chiropsalmus quadrumanus (Order Chirodropida, Family
Chiropsalmidae)
Like in T. haplonema, the male gonad of C. quadrumanus is composed of several
follicles surrounded by a gastrodermal epithelium (Fig. 6A). Inside the follicles there is
only one type of germ cells (e.g. spermatogonia, spermatocytes or spermatids),
suggesting a synchronous process (Fig. 6B-C). The follicles have a centripetal
arrangement and can present, in the periphery, spermatogonia organized in one and
more layers (Fig. 6D-E). The spermatocytes have rounded nucleus and condensed
chromatin. Juxtaposed to the spermatogonial layer lays the thin spermatocytes layer,
detected through the meiotic signs in the chromatin (Fig. 6E). The spermatids showed
reduced cytoplasmic volume (Fig. 6F) giving rises to sperm (Fig. 6F-G). The cells of
the gastrodermal epithelium have an irregular shape containing vesicles not stained by
any of the histochemical stainings (Fig. 6C).
Differences were also detected between the nuclear size of the different types of
cells (Kruskal-Wallis test: H = 313.5568; p < 0. 001, Fig. 7) highlighting significant
reduction in nuclear size. The spermatogonia have a large and elongated nucleus (5.2 ±
0.9µm). The spermatocytes, when compared to the spermatogonia, present reduction in
the nucleus size (Dunn test: z = 7.7329; p < 0.05) with nucleus measuring 3.2 ± 0.9 µm.
This last cellular type can be in different phases of meiotic prophase (Fig. 6C, E).
The spermatids begin the spermiogenesis process and there is no difference in
nuclear size between spermatid and sperm (Dunn test: z = 2.082; p > 0.05). The
35
spermatids are characterized by the presence of rounded and basophilic nucleus (1.8 ±
0.4µm) (Fig. 6F). The sperm show rounded head (1.5 ± 0.3 µm) with also rounded and
strongly basophilic nucleus, which is reactive to proteins (Fig. 6G-I) as the acidophilic
flagellum (Fig. 6F-G). In C. quadrumanus, the sperm head is negative to PAS-H, as the
flagellum (Fig. 6J). When mature, the sperm is released through rupture of the follicle
wall (Fig. 6F).
The gonadal cycle of C. quadrumanus seems to be divided in the same four stages
presented in T. haplonema. The rudimentary stage has only spermatogonia and
spermatocytes (Fig. 6A). The intermediate stage contains spermatids between the
spermatocytes (Figure 6B) and the mature stage with all characteristic cellular stages of
spermatogenesis (Fig. 6C to J). The spawned stage was not observed in none of the
individuals.
Discussion
The male gonad of T. haplonema and C. quadrumanus have similar morphology
and the general pattern is also observed in all cubozoans already studied, like Carybdea
xaymacana (only description) (Conant 1898), Chironex fleckeri (Southcott 1956),
Carybdea marsupialis (Claus 1878; Avian et al. 1993; García-Rodriguez 2015), Copula
sivickisi (García-Rodriguez 2015; Garm et al. 2015), Alatina alata and Morbakka
virulenta (García-Rodriguez 2015). The organization of the male gonad in T.
haplonema and C. quadrumanus seems to be more similar to that observed in Ch.
fleckeri, Ca. marsupialis, A. alata and M. virulenta, in which the gonad is a thin,
laminar and independent tissue layer located between the mesoglea and gastrodermis.
The male gonad is composed of several follicles surrounded by a gastrodermal
epithelium and this structure was already observed in other cubozoans (Conant 1898;
Southcott 1956; Avian et al. 1993; García-Rodriguez 2015).
36
The gastrodermal epithelium is characterized by cells containing several vesicles
with negative reaction to all histological and histochemical staining used (Table 3). This
absence of reaction was also described by (Southcott 1956) for Ch. fleckeri and by
(García-Rodriguez 2015) for A. alata, Co. sivickisi, Ca. marsupialis, M. virulenta, T.
haplonema (specimen from New Jersey) and C. quadrumanus, but the authors called
them vacuoles. The composition of such secretion remains unknown, indicating the
need of further ultrastructural studies to solve this question.
The “fingerprint” pattern of the male gonad seems to be characteristic for all
cubozoans, thus including T. haplonema and C. quadrumanus. Such pattern was first
described for Ch. fleckeri (Southcott 1956) and later for other species (Gershwin 2005).
It is important to highlight that the use of the “fingerprint” to distinguish sexes in
Cubozoa is effective. However, this “fingerprint” pattern is not related with the gonadal
maturation.
For both studied species, the follicles have spermatogonia in the periphery
organized in one or more layers, just like (García-Rodriguez 2015) described to T.
haplonema (specimen from New Jersey). In T. haplonema and C. quadrumanus, the
spermatogonia are bulky, with the nucleus and nucleolus well developed. The
spermatocyte and the spermatid have round shape and the spermatids reduce the
cytoplasmic volume, turning into sperm. This description is very similar to that
observed in the micrographs of C. quadrumanus presented by García-Rodriguez (2015).
The sperm of T. haplonema undergo the modification of the head structure assuming the
conical morphology with elongated projection. However in C. quadramanus it is
observed the maintenance of the rounded morphology of the head.
For both species here studied, the sperm are accumulated in the mid region of the
follicle and the release occurs by rupture of the follicle wall as already described in the
37
cubozoans Ch. fleckeri (Southcott 1956; Yamaguchi and Hartwick 1980), and Ca.
xaymacana (Conant 1898). Yamaguchi and Hartwick (1980) and Toshino et al. (2013)
reported unfertilized eggs and external fertilization to Chiropsella bronzie (as
Chiropsalmus quadrigatus) and Morbakka virulenta, respectively, suggesting a release
of free sperm in the water column. This type of sperm release is different to that
described to the cubomedusae Tripedalia cystophora (Werner 1973a; Werner 1973b),
Alatina alata and Copula sivickisi (García-Rodriguez 2015; Garm et al. 2015). For T.
cystophora and A. alata the release of sperm is by spermatozeugmata. While, Copula
sivickisi presents copula behavior in which the male transfer the spermatophore from its
tentacle to the female's tentacles, that internalizes the spermatophore to gastric cavity,
followed by internal fertilization (Lewis and Long 2005; Bentlage et al. 2010; García-
Rodriguez 2015; Garm et al. 2015; Marques et al. 2015).
The sperm of cnidarians do not show a typical acrosome, but could present several
small vesicles in the anterior region of the head or near the mitochondria (Afzelius and
Franzén 1971; Hinsch and Clark Jr. 1973; Chapman 1974; Hinsch 1974; Miller 1983;
Harrison and Jamieson 1988; Rouse and Pitt 2000; Corbelli et al. 2003). These cells are
usually characterized by rounded head, small midpiece usually with four mitochondria
and a long flagellum (Franzén 1956; Harrison and Jamieson 1988; Corbelli et al. 2003).
To Cubozoa, only (García-Rodriguez 2015) describes the histochemical composition of
these cells and (Corbelli et al. 2003) the ultrastructure. The negative reaction of the
sperm head to the PAS staining in T. haplonema and C. quadrumanus could not be an
indicative of the presence of such little vesicles but, for both species, these small
vesicles can be seen in the ultrastrucutral cuts (Tiseo and Morandini, unpublished data).
There are few the works describing the gonadal cycle for cnidarians (Kessel 1968;
Chapman 1974; Rottini-Sandrini and Avian 1991; Macchi et al. 1995). Among them,
38
(Campbell 1974) presents general characteristics of the gametogenic cycle stating that it
exhibits, frequently, seasonal and circadian periodicity. For Cubozoa, even any of the
already published papers cite the cycle of gonadal maturation, there is some evidences
of this synchronous maturation of cells as presented by Conant (1898) and Southcott
(1956). Here we described the different stages of the gonadal cycle of both studied
species. In T. haplonema was observed four stages of maturation (rudimentary,
intermediate, mature and spawned) and for C. quadrumanus was recorded only three of
the four stages (rudimentary, intermediate, mature). Even the last stage not being
observed to C. quadrumanus, we believe that the spawned stage is also present, once
this species also presents synchrony in the spermatogenesis process and release of
sperm by rupture of the follicle wall. As we describe here, Macchi et al. (1995)
described the gonadal cycle of the male and female gonad of the hydromedusa Olindias
sambaquiensis. The authors divide the gonadal cycle in only four stages: immature
(individual that we cannot note sexual differentiation), in development, mature and
spent, but this division could not be used here once we noted differences in the gonadal
stages of the studied species and we also not observed any immature individual.
In conclusion, even both studied species belonging to different orders, the male
histological gonadal structure, the gonadal cycle and the spermatogenesis process are
similar. The general morphology of the sperm of C. quadrumanus (Family
Chiropsalmidae, Order Chirodropidae) seems to be more similar to the sperm found in
Scyphozoa, whiles the general sperm morphology of T. haplonema (Family
Carybdeidae, Order Carybdeida), seems to differ mainly in the head morphology. But
only an ultrastructural study could enumerate and confirm this hypothesis.
39
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [GRT grants
2012/19080-1 and 2014/08785-1, FJZ grants BIOTA 2010/50188-8, ACM grants
2010/50174-7, 2011/50242-5, 2013/50484-4]; CAPES [ACM 23038.004309/2014-51];
and CNPq [ACMo (301039/2013-5, 486337/2013-8)]. Thanks are due to Enio Mattos,
Phillip Lenktaitis and Prof. Dr. José Eduardo Marian for help in the histology
procedures. We also thanks to anonymous reviewers for all comments and suggestions.
This is a contribution of NP-BioMar, USP. This study was conducted in accordance
with Brazilian laws (GRT SisBio license No. 611377-9; FJZ MMA SisBio permanent
license No. 34587-1; ACMo MMA SisBio permanent license No. 15031-2).
References
Afzelius BA, Franzén A (1971) The Spermatozoon of the Jellyfish Nausithoe. J
Ultrastruct Res 37:186–199.
Arneson AC, Cutress CE (1976) Life History of Carybdea alata Reynaud, 1830
(Cubomedusae). In: Mackie GO (ed) Coelenterate Ecology and Behavior. Springer
US, Boston, MA, pp 227–236
Audino JA, Marian JEAR, Wanninger A, Lopes SGBC (2015) Development of the
pallial eye in Nodipecten nodosus (Mollusca: Bivalvia): insights into early visual
performance in scallops. Zoomorphology 134:403–415. doi: 10.1007/s00435-015-
0265-8
Avian M, Bonivento P, Montanari G, et al (1993) Carybdea marsupialis L. (Cubozoa),
istologia delle gonadi. Biol Mar Suppl Notiz SIBM 1:75–78.
Bentlage B, Cartwright P, Yanagihara AA, et al (2010) Evolution of box jellyfish
(Cnidaria: Cubozoa), a group of highly toxic invertebrates. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci
277:493–501. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1707
Bentlage B, Lewis C (2012) An illustrated key and synopsis of the families and genera
40
of carybdeid box jellyfishes (Cnidaria: Cubozoa: Carybdeida), with emphasis on
the “Irukandji family” (Carukiidae). J Nat Hist 46:2595–2620. doi:
10.1080/00222933.2012.717645
Campbell RD (1974) Cnidaria. In: Giese AC, Pearse JS (eds) Reproduction of Marine
Invertebrates, Volume 1: Acoelomate and Pseudocoelomate Metazonas. Academic
Press, pp 133–199
Chapman DD (1974) Cnidarian Histology. In: Muscatine L, Lenhoff HM (eds)
Coelenterate Biology: Reviews and New Perspectives. Academic PRess, New
York, pp 2–92
Claus C (1878) Ueber Charybdea marsupialis. Arb aus dem Zool Inst der Univ Wien
1:1–56.
Conant FS (1898) The cubomedusae. Johns Hopkins University
Corbelli A, Avian M, Marotta R, Ferraguti M (2003) The spermatozoon of Carybdea
marsupialis (Cubozoa, Cnidaria). Invertebr Reprod Dev 43:95–104. doi:
10.1080/07924259.2003.9652528
Daly M, Brugler MR, Cartwright P, et al (2007) The phylum Cnidaria: A review of
phylogenetic patterns and diversity 300 years after Linnaeus. Zootaxa 1668:127–
182.
Fautin DG (1992) Cnidaria. In: Adiyodi KG, Adiyodi RG (eds) Reproductive Biology
of Invertebrates (Sexual Differentiation and Behaviour). pp 31–52
Franzén A (1956) On spermiogenesis. morphology of the spermatozoon, and biology of
fertilization among invertebrates. Zool Bidr Uppsala 31:355–482.
García-Rodriguez J (2015) Anatomia associada ao comportamento reprodutivo de
Cubozoa. Universidade de São Paulo
Garm A, Lebouvier M, Tolunay D (2015) Mating in the Box Jellyfish Copula sivickisi
41
— Novel Function of Cnidocytes. J Morphol 276:1055–1064. doi:
10.1002/jmor.20395
Gershwin L (2006) Comments on Chiropsalmus (Cnidaria: Cubozoa: Chirodropida): a
preliminary revision of the Chiropsalmidae, with descriptions of two new genera
and two new species. Zootaxa 42:1–42.
Gershwin L (2005) Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Australian Cubozoa. James Cook
University
Harrison PL, Jamieson B (1988) Cnidaria and Ctenophora. In: Adiyodi KG, Adiyod RG
(eds) Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates. Vol IX Part A, Progress in Male
Gamete Ultrastructure and Phylogeny. Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 21–95
Hartwick RF (1991) Observations on the anatomy, behavior, reproduction and life-cycle
of the cubozoan Carybdea sivickisi. Hydrobiologia 216/217:171–179. doi:
10.1007/978-94-011-3240-4
Hinsch GW (1974) Comparative ultrastructure of cnidarian sperm. Am Zool 14:457–
465. doi: 10.1093/icb/14.2.457
Hinsch GW, Clark Jr. WH (1973) Comparative fine structure of Cnidaria spermatozoa.
Biol Reprod 8:62–73.
Junqueira LCU, Junqueira LMMS (1983) Técnicas Básicas de Citologia e Histologia.
Editora Santos, São Paulo
Kessel RG (1968) Electron microscope studies on developing oocytes of a coelenterate
medusa with special reference to vitellogenesis. J Morphol 126:211–247. doi:
10.1002/jmor.1051260205
Lewis C, Bentlage B, Yanagihara A, et al (2013) Redescription of Alatina alata
(Reynaud, 1830) (Cnidaria: Cubozoa) from Bonaire, Dutch Caribbean. Zootaxa
3737:473. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3737.4.8
42
Lewis C, Kubota S, Migotto AE, Collins AG (2008) Sexually Dimorphic Cubomedusa
Carybdea sivickisi (Cnidaria: Cubozoa) in Seto, Wakayama, Japan. Publ Seto Mar
Biol Lab 40:1–8.
Lewis C, Long TAF (2005) Courtship and reproduction in Carybdea sivickisi
(Cnidaria : Cubozoa). Mar Biol 147:477–483. doi: 10.1007/s00227-005-1602-0
Macchi GJ, Mianzan H, Christiansen HE, Ramirez F (1995) Histology of the gonadal
cycle of the stinging hydromedusa Olindas sambaquiensis, Muller (1861) at
Blanca Bay, Argentina. Boll Della Soc Adriat di Sci LXXVI 59–68.
Marques AC, Collins AG (2004) Cladistic analysis of Medusozoa and cnidarian
evolution. Invertebr Biol 123:23–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7410.2004.tb00139.x
Marques AC, García J, Lewis Ames C (2015) Internal fertilization and sperm storage in
cnidarians: a response to Orr and Brennan. Trends Ecol Evol 30:435–436. doi:
10.1016/j.tree.2015.06.002
Marques AC, Morandini AC, Migotto AE (2003) Synopsis of knowledge on Cnidaria
Medusozoa from Brazil. Biota Neotrop 3:1–18.
Mayer AG (1910) Medusae of the world Volume III The Scyphomedusae. Carnegie
Institution of Washington, Washington
Mello MLS, Vidal B de C (1980) Práticas de Biologia Celular. Editora Edgar Blücher -
FUNCAMP, Campinas
Mianzan HW, Cornelius PFS (1999) Cubomedusae and Scyphomedusae. In:
Boltovskoy D (ed) South Atlantic Zooplankton Vol 1. Backhuys Publishers,
Leiden, pp 513–559
Migotto AE, Marques AC, Morandini AC, Silveira FL da (2002) Checklist of the
Cnidaria Medusozoa of Brazil. Biota Neotrop 2:1–31. doi: 10.1590/S1676-
06032002000100010
43
Miller RL (1983) Cnidaria. In: Adiyodi KG, Adiyodi RG (eds) Reproductive Biology of
Invertebrates. Vol II Spermatogenesis and Sperm Function. Wiley & Sons, New
York, pp 23–69
Morandini AC, Ascher D, Stampar SN, Ferreira JF V. (2005) Cubozoa e Scyphozoa
(Cnidaria: Medusozoa) de águas costeiras do Brasil. Iheringia Série Zool 95:281–
294. doi: 10.1590/S0073-47212005000300008
Morandini AC, Marques AC (2010) Revision of the genus Chrysaora Péron & Lesueur,
1810 (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa). Zootaxa 2464:1–97.
Müller F (1860) Zwei neue Quallen von Santa Catharina (Brasilien). Tamoya
haplonema und quadrumana. Abhandlungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft
Halle 5:1–12.
Nagata RM, Haddad MA, Nogueira Júnior M (2009) The nuisance of medusae
(Cnidaria, Medusozoa) to shrimp trawls in central part of southern Brazilian Bight,
from the perspective of artisanal fishermen. Panam J Aquat Sci 4:312–325.
Pearse A (1960) Histochemistry: Theorical and Applied. J&A Churchill, London
Rottini-Sandrini L, Avian M (1991) Reproduction of Pelagia noctiluca in the central
and northern Adriatic Sea. Hydrobiologia 216/217:197–202.
Rouse GW, Pitt K (2000) Ultrastructure of the sperm of Catostylus mosaicus and
Phyllorhiza punctata (Scyphozoa , Cnidaria): Implications for sperm terminology
and the inference of reproductive mechanisms. Invertebr Reprod Dev 38:23–34.
Sant’Anna B, Turra A, Zara F (2010) Simultaneous activity of male and female gonads
in intersex hermit crabs. Aquat Biol 10:201–209. doi: 10.3354/ab00283
Southcott RV (1956) Studies on Australian Cubomedusae, including a new genus and
species apparently harmful to man. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 7:254–283.
Stewart SE (1996) Field behavior of Tripedalia cystophora (class cubozoa). Mar
44
Freshw Behav Physiol 27:175–188. doi: 10.1080/10236249609378963
Straehler-Pohl I, Garm A, Morandini AC (2014) Sexual dimorphism in Tripedaliidae
(Conant 1897) (Cnidaria, Cubozoa, Carybdeida). Zootaxa 3785:533. doi:
10.11646/zootaxa.3785.4.3
Thiel ME (1936) Ordnung Cubomedusae. In: Bronns DHG (ed) Klassen und ordnungen
des Tierreichs. Zweiter Band: Spongiaria, Coelenterata, Echinodermata, II:
Abteilung: Coelenterata, 2 Buch Scyphomedusae, 2. Lieferung. Akademische
Verlagsgesellschaft m. b. H, Leipzig, pp 173–308
Toshino S, Miyake H, Ohtsuka S, et al (2013) Development and polyp formation of the
giant box jellyfish Morbakka virulenta (Kishinouye , 1910) (Cnidaria: Cubozoa)
collected from the Seto Inland Sea, western Japan. Plankt Benthos Res 8:1–8. doi:
10.3800/pbr.8.1
Werner B (1973a) Spermatozeugmen und Paarungsverhalten bei Tripedalia cystophora
(Cubomedusae). Mar Biol 18:212–217. doi: 10.1007/BF00367987
Werner B (1973b) New Investigations on Systematics and Evolution of the Class
Scyphozoa and the Phylum Cnidaria. Publ Seto Mar Biol Lab 20:35–61. doi:
10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Yamaguchi M, Hartwick R (1980) Early Life history of the sea wasp, Chironex fleckeri
(Class Cubozoa). In: Tardent P, Tardent R (eds) Development and cellular biology
of coelenterates. Elsevier, Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp 11–16
Zara FJ, Toyama MH, Caetano FH, López-Greco LS (2012) Spermatogenesis,
Spermatophore, and Seminal Fluid Production in the Adult Blue Crab Callinectes
danae (Portunidae). J Crustac Biol 32:249–262. doi: 10.1163/193724011X615479
45
Tables
Table 1: Previous studies describing the morphology of the gonad of cubozoans through histological approach.
Order Family Specie References
Chirodropidae
Chiropsalmidae Chiropsalmus quadrumanus García-Rodriguez (2015); This study
Chirodropidae Chironex fleckeri Southcott (1956)
Carybdeida
Tamoyidae
Tamoya haplonema (New
Jersey specimen)
García-Rodriguez (2015)
Tamoya haplonema This study
Tripedaliidae Copula sivickisi
Lewis and Long (2005); Garm et al. (2015); García-
Rodriguez (2015)
Carybdeidae Carybdea xaymacana Conant (1898)
Alatinidae
Carybdea marsupialis Claus (1878); Thiel (1936)
Alatina alata García-Rodriguez (2015)
Carukiidae Morbakka virulenta García-Rodriguez (2015)
46
Table 2: Details of sampling sites.
Sites of Collection Coordinates Species collected
Santos – São Vicente Bay (03/2009 and 04/2010) 23°59'33.97" S/ 46°22'12.64" O C. quadrumanus and T. haplonema
Municipality of Ubatuba (24 and 25/07/2012) 23⁰31'147''S/ 045⁰05'193''O T. haplonema
Municipality of São Sebastião (10/06/2014) 23⁰ 27' 5''S/ 45⁰1'47''O C. quadrumanus
Cananéia lagoon estuarine system (14 and
15/04/2015)
25⁰03'604''S/ 47⁰54'419''O C. quadrumanus and T. haplonema
47
Table 3: Summarized results of histochemistry techniques used to highlight the properties of secretions and sperm in Tamoya haplonema and
Chiropsalmus quadrumanus.
Histochemical Technique
Toluidine Blue
(Acids structures)
Bromophenol blue
(basic proteins)
Ponceau xylidine
(total proteins)
PAS (neutral
polysaccharides)
Tamoya
haplonema
Secretion of the vesicles of
gastrodermal epithelium - -
Not observed
-
Sperm head +++ +++ -
Flagellum ++ ++ +
Chiropsalmus
quadrumanus
Secretion of the vesicles of
gastrodermal epithelium - - - -
Sperm head +++ +++ +++ -
Flagellum + ++ ++ +
+++ = strongly positive; ++ = positive; + = weakly positive; − = negative.
48
List of Figures
Figure 1
Figure 1: Sampling sites along the coast of São Paulo state (SE Brazil). (A) Cananéia lagoon estuarine system. (B) Santos and São
Vicente Bay. (C) São Sebastião county. (D) Ubatuba county.
Figure 2
Figure 2: General morphology of the male cubozoan gonad. (A) Longitudinal section of male gonad, characterized
by the “fingerprint” pattern. (B) Cross section of a mature male gonad. (F) Follicle, (Ge) gastrodermal epithelium,
(Me) Mesoglea, (sg) spermatogonia, (sc) spermatocyte, (st) spermatid, (sz) sperm, (v) vesicle.
49
Figure 3
Figure 3: Spermatogenesis in Tamoya haplonema. (A) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Longitudinal section of the male gonad highlighting
the pattern similar to a “fingerprint”. (B) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Cross section of the male gonad. Follicle with spermatogonia with
an elongated nucleus and organized in only one layer. (C) Toluidine blue. Cross section of the male gonad. Note the spermatogonia
organized in more than one layer. (D) Toluidine Blue. Spermatocytes in different stages of meiosis. (E) Hematoxylin and Eosin.
Mature follicle with sperm. (F) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Follicle with spermatids between the spermatocytes. (G) Toluidine blue. Detail of the sperm inside the mature follicles. The sperm have an elongated head with an anterior conic projection and visible
flagellum. (H) Mercuric Bromophenol Blue. Sperm being released by rupture of follicle wall, note the nucleus strongly positive to
basic proteins. (I) PAS-Hematoxylin. The anterior portion of the sperm head had negative reaction to PAS. (F) Follicle, (Ge) Gastrodermal epithelium, (sg) Spermatogonia, (sc) Spermatocyte, (st) Spermatid, (sz) Sperm, (v) vesicle.
50
Figure 4
Figure 4: Nuclear diameter of the different spermatic cells of Tamoya haplonema. The dots correspond to the average and the bars
to standard deviation.
51
Figure 5
Figure 5: Gonadal maturation in Tamoya haplonema. Hematoxylin and Eosin. (A) Rudimentary male gonad. Note only the presence of spermatogonia and spermatocytes. (B) Developing male gonad. Note spermatids between the spermatocytes. (C) Mature
male gonad with follicles full of sperm. (D) Detail of the mature gonad highlighting the sperm. (E) The spawned gonad is
characterized by the presence of empty spaces inside the follicles (black arrow) (F) Detail of the previous image highlighting the empty spaces (black arrow). (F) Follicle, (Ge) Gastrodermal epithelium, (sg) Spermatogonia, (sc) Spermatocyte, (st) Spermatid, (sz)
Sperm, (v) vesicle.
52
Figure 6
Figure 6: Spermatogenesis in Chiropsalmus quadramanus. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin. General view of the rudimentary gonad with the follicles in a longitudinal section highlighting the pattern similar to a “fingerprint”. (B) Hematoxylin and eosin. Developing
gonad, with the presence of some spermatids between the spermatocytes. (C) Hematoxylin and eosin. Cross section of the mature
gonad. The spermatogonia have elongated basophilic nucleus. (D) Hematoxylin and eosin. Mature follicle with spermatogonia in the periphery and sperm in the center. (E) Toluidine blue. Spermatogonia with large nucleus and spermatocytes in different phases of
meiosis. (F) Hematoxylin and eosin. Final spermatids with rounded head. The sperm are released through rupture of the follicle
wall. (G) Hematoxylin and eosin. The sperm have rounded basophilic head, and acidophilic midpiece and flagellum. (H) Pounceau xylidine. Sperm with positive reaction to total proteins. (I) Mercuric bromophenol blue. Sperm with positive reaction to basic
proteins. (J) PAS. The sperm presented negative reaction to PAS. (F) Follicle, (Ge) Gastrodermal epithelium, (sg) Spermatogonia,
(sc) Spermatocyte, (st) Spermatid, (sz) Sperm, (v) vesicle.
53
Figure 7
Figure 7: Nuclear diameter of the different spermatic cells of Chiropsalmus quadrumanus. The dots correspond to the average and the bars to standard deviation.
54
Capítulo 2
Spermatogenesis and sperm morphology in cubozoans from SE Brazilian and
Australian coasts
Gisele R. Tiseo1*
, Peter L. Harrison2, Jamie Seymour
3 and André C. Morandini
1
1 Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, R.
Matão trav. 14, n.101, 05508-090, São Paulo, Brazil;
2 Marine Ecology Research Centre, School of Environment, Science and Engineering,
Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, 2480, Lismore, NSW, Australia;
3Australian Institute for Tropical Health and Medicine, Centre for Biodiscovery &
Molecular Development of Therapeutics, Division of Tropical Health and Medicine,
James Cook University, Cairns Campus, Mcgregor Road, 4878, Cairns, Australia.
Running Title: Spermatogenesis in some species of Cubozoa
*Corresponding author. Tel: +55 11 30917621;
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (GRT); [email protected] (PLH);
[email protected] (JS); [email protected] (ACM).
55
Abstract
The spermatogenesis is poorly studied in members of the class Cubozoa. In this work
we describe the ultrastructure of spermatogenesis and sperm morphology of the
Brazilian species Tamoya haplonema and Chiropsalmus quadrumanus. And we also
describe the spermatogenesis and sperm morphology of three Australian species:
Carukia barnesi, Chironex fleckeri, and Chiropsella bronzie under light microscopy,
histochemistry and ultrastructure. Specimens of T. haplonema and C. quarumanus were
collected in two places along the São Paulo coast, Brazil. The Australian species were
collected near the Great Barrier Reef, Queensland using light traps to attract them. For
light microscopy, the male gonad was removed and fixed in paraformaldehyde 4% in
sodium phosphate buffer 0.2M (pH 7.2) for 24 hours and later processed following the
protocol for historesin. Serial sections were performed and the slides stained with
hematoxylin and eosin, and techniques for proteins (mercuric bromophenol blue and
ponceau xylidine), acid materials (toluidine blue) and neutral polysaccharides (PAS).
For transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) fragments of 1mm3 of the male gonad
were preserved in Karnovsky solution (2.5% glutaraldehyde with 2% paraformaldehyde
in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4, 2.5 mM of CaCl2 and saccharose) or in
Glutaraldehyde fixative solution (2.5% glutaraldehyde 0.1 M sodium cacodylate
buffered Millipore filtered seawater, pH 7.2-7.4) later processed for protocol in TEM.
The male gonad of all species is organized in elongated follicles, resembling a
fingerprint pattern. In a mature gonad, spermatogonia and spermatocytes are found near
the follicle wall while spermatids and spermatozoa are located at the center. The sperm
release occurs through rupture of follicular wall in T. haplonema, C. quadrumanus,
Carukia barnesi and Chiropsella bronzie. The main morphology of the sperm in the
studied species is very similar, with electrondense nucleus of granular chromatin,
56
electrondense vesicles above the nucleus, midpiece with 6 mitochondria, proximal and
distal centrioles and pericentriolar apparatus, and flagellum with the usual pattern of
9+2 microtubules.
Key-words: Spermatogenesis, box-jellyfish, sperm, Histology, TEM.
Introduction
The spermatogenesis is poorly studied in members of the class Cubozoa (Tiseo
et al. 2016 - chapter one of this dissertation). Under light microscopy there is only a few
works describing the histological structure of the male gonad or part of the
spermatogenesis (Thiel 1936; Southcott 1956; Avian et al. 1993; García-Rodriguez
2015; Garm et al. 2015). Under transmission electronic microscopy, were described
only aspects of the male gonad, spermatozeugmata and sperm of Copula sivickisi (Garm
et al. 2015) and the ultrastructure of the sperm of Carybdea marsupialis (Corbelli et al.
2003).
Box-jellyfish are gonochoric, with distinction between male and female gonads
done by color difference and recognition of the “fingerprint” pattern (Southcott 1956;
Werner 1973a; Gershwin 2005; Lewis and Long 2005; Bentlage et al. 2010; Bentlage
and Lewis 2012). The gonad has paired leaf-like hemigonads which are attached along
the length of the septum in most carybdeids and are broader and more developed in the
upper half, enveloping gastric saccules in most chiropdropids (Mayer 1910; Southcott
1956; Gershwin 2005).
For Scyphozoa, Anthozoa and Cubozoa the male gonad is derived from
interstitial cells of the gastrodermis, which migrate to the mesoglea differentiating the
male follicles (Miller 1983; Tiseo et al. 2016 - chapter one of this dissertation). The
spermatogenesis occurs inside these follicles and the mature sperm are released through
57
rupture of the follicle wall (Toshino et al. 2013; García-Rodriguez 2015; Tiseo et al.
2016 - chapter 1 of this dissertation) or transferred to the female through the mating
behavior (Conant 1898; Miller 1983; Harrison and Jamieson 1988; Lewis and Long
2005; Lewis et al. 2008; Marques et al. 2015). In Cubozoa there were reported two
different strategies of sperm release: free or packed. The free sperm are released in the
water by rupture of the follicle wall (García-Rodriguez 2015) and the packed strategy
consists of groups of sperm involved by an extracellular matrix (spermatozeugmata)
(e.g. Trypedalia cystophora – Werner, 1973b and Alatina alata – García-Rodriguez,
2015) or in spermatophores (e. g. Copula sivickisi – (Hartwick 1991; Straehler-Pohl et
al. 2014; García-Rodriguez 2015; Garm et al. 2015).
The general morphology of the cubozoans male gonad, viewed through
histological sections, is characterized by several follicles filled with spermatic cells
surrounded by a gastrodermal epithelium (Conant 1898; Southcott 1956; García-
Rodriguez 2015; Tiseo et al. 2016). The spermatogenesis is well known consisting of
pre-meiotic cellular stages (spermatogonia) with large nucleus and visible nucleolus,
and meiotic cellular stages (spermatocytes) with synaptonemal complex between
homologous chromosomes. The spermatocytes II divide into two spermatids that are
interconnected by cytoplasmic bridges. During the spermiogenesis, the spermatid
reduce the cytoplasmic volume turning into sperm (Miller 1983; Gaino et al. 2013).
There are few available information about cnidarians sperm ultrastructure and most
descriptions are for the Anthozoa and Hydrozoa classes (Harrison and Jamieson 1988).
For Cubozoa, Werner (1973a; 1973b) made a general description of the sperm of
Trypedalia cystophora and (Corbelli et al. 2003) described the ultrastructure
morphology of the sperm of Carybdea marsupialis.
58
The general sperm morphology, under light microscopy, is composed of a
rounded, ovoid, conic or elongated head, a visible midpiece and a long flagellum
(Franzén 1956; Harrison and Jamieson 1988). Under transmission electronic
microscopy, it is observed the symmetry of the sperm head, the presence of small
vesicles (precursors of the acrosome) in the anterior region of the sperm, midpiece with
four or more mitochondria, Golgi complex, proximal and distal centrioles and the
pericentriolar apparatus of the flagellum (Hinsch and Clarck Jr. 1973; Hinsch 1974;
Miller 1983; Harrison and Jamieson 1988; Rouse and Pitt 2000; Corbelli et al. 2003).
The species Tamoya haplonema belongs to the family Tamoyidae (Carybdeida),
occurring in the Atlantic coast of America (Mianzan and Cornelius 1999; Morandini et
al. 2005), and is widely distributed along Brazil (Kramp 1961; Mianzan and Cornelius
1999; Morandini et al. 2005). Chiropsalmus quadrumanus (Chiropsalmidae,
Chirodropida) is one of the four species of the genus (Marques et al. 2003) being
distributed at the Atlantic coast of America (Kramp 1961; Mianzan and Cornelius 1999;
Morandini et al. 2005). Both species are found in São Paulo coast and are usually
related with stings caused by box-jellyfish in the country (Haddad et al. 2002;
Morandini et al. 2005).
The Cubozoa Carukia barnesi (Carukiidae, Carybdeida) is one of the most
smaller jellyfish in the world being distributed in the Exmouth county in Australia
Ocidental, across northern Australia and down the Queensland coast (Fenner and Hadok
2002; Kingsford et al. 2012). This species is commonly found during the jellyfish
season and also in the Northeastern Great Barrier Reef (GBR) in the inner and middle
cross-shelf transects at night (Kingsford et al. 2012). Chironex fleckeri (Chirodropidae,
Chirodropida) is one of the most common chirodropids in Australia coast (Williamson
et al. 1996) and is also found in Queensland during the danger period (October to May).
59
The specie Chiropsella bronzie (Chiropsalmidae, Chirodropida) is an abundant specie
found from Port Douglas to Cairns during the summer months, being distributed from
Cooktown (in the North) to Magnetic Island (Townsville)(Gershwin 2006).
Here we describe the spermatogenesis and sperm morphology under light and
transmission electronic microscopy of five cubozoan species, two Carybdeida and three
Chirodropida. Additionally, we compare the sperm ultrastructure of the studied species
with the only cubozoan sperm already described in the literature, looking for common
features.
Material and Methods
Sampling
For T. haplonema and C. quadrumanus, samplings occurred in Cananéia Estuary
(25ᵒ03'604''S 47ᵒ54'419''W) and Ubatuba county (23ᵒ31'147''S 045ᵒ05'193''W), São
Paulo State, SE Brazil (Figure 1), during April and May of 2015. The animals were
collected by hand in water surface or with shrimp trawls. The specimens were
transported alive to the laboratory and identified following Morandini et al. (2005).
The Australian species were collected along the eastern coast of Queensland.
Carukia barnesi was collected in Double Island Reef (16°43’25.55’’S 145°41’0.43’’W)
in November of 2013 and February of 2016. The specie Chironex fleckeri was found in
South Mission Beach (17°56’43.46’’ 146°6’13.08’’W) in 2015 and in Tully heads
(18°2’13.78’’S 146°3’5.08’’W) in April of 2016. Chiropsella bronzie was collected in
Pourt Douglas (16°29’6.10’’S 145°27’36.81’’W) in April of 2016 (Figure 2). The
collection occurred manually using a small bucket or hand net at the water surface,
during the night, using light traps to attract the jellyfish. The specimens were
transported alive to the Laboratory at James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, and
60
were kept in plastics boxes until dissection. The animals were identified and measured
accordingly to Dawson (2005), Gershwin (2005), Tibballs (2006) and Gershwin and
Kingsford (2008).
Light microscopy
The animals were anesthetized by thermal shock (-20°C) for 5 minutes. Then,
samples of gonadal tissue were preserved in 4% formaldehyde solution buffered with a
saline solution of 0.2 M sodium phosphate (pH 7.2) for 24 hours. After fixation, the
samples were dehydrated in ethanol series (30-95%) and embedded in Leica®
methacrylate historesin. Serial sections 3-4 μm thick were made on a rotative
microtome. For histological description the tissue samples were stained with
hematoxylin and eosin (HE) (Modified from Junqueira and Junqueira 1983), without
baths in ethanol and xylene (Sant’Anna et al. 2010; Zara et al. 2012; Tiseo et al. 2014).
To analyze the chemical composition of the tissues, the slides were stained with
mercuric bromophenol blue and ponceau xylidine for proteins (Pearse 1960; Mello and
Vidal 1980). The PAS technique was used to visualize neutral polysaccharides
(Junqueira and Junqueira 1983) and the toluidine blue to visualize acid components
(Modified from Audino et al. 2015).
Transmission Electronic Microscopy (TEM)
For transmission electronic microscopy (TEM), fragments of 1mm3 of the male
gonad were preserved in Karnovsky solution (modified from Karnovsky 1965)
consisting of 2.5% glutaraldehyde with 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium
cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) with 2.5 mM of CaCl2 and saccharose (Brazilian species)
and in Glutaraldehyde fixative solution consisting of 2.5% glutaraldehyde 0.1 M sodium
61
cacodylate buffered Millipore filtered seawater (pH 7.2-7.4) for 30 minutes at 4ºC
(Australian species), followed by post-fixation in 1% osmium tetroxide with the same
buffer, for one hour at the same temperature. Then, samples were dehydrated in ethanol
series (30 to 100%), and embedded in Spurr’s® resin. Semi-thin and ultrathin sections
were obtained with a Leica® ultramicrotome (gently provided by the Electronic
Microscopy Laboratory from the Department of Genetics, Institute of Biosciences of the
University of São Paulo). Grids with sections were contrasted with uranyl acetate and
lead citrate, and later examined and photographed in the Zeiss EM 900 Transmission
Electronic Microscope operated at 80kV.
Results
Ultrastructure of spermatogenesis in Tamoya haplonema (Tamoyidae)
The male gonad in T. haplonema is characterized by the presence of several
follicles with spermatic cells surrounded by a gastrodermal epithelium (Fig. 3A). The
cells that compose the gastrodermal epithelium have an acidophilic nucleus, located in
different positions of the basophilic cytoplasm which extends between the follicles.
Several large vesicles not reactive to hematoxylin and eosin are observed in the
cytoplasm (Fig. 3A). Under transmission electronic microscopy (TEM), these vesicles
are filled with granular electrondense material (Fig. 3B) that came from between the
follicles in smaller vesicles (Fig. 3C-F). The cells of gastrodermal epithelium, in TEM,
have cilia in the apical region (Fig. 3B), irregular format (Fig. 3B-C), several little
vesicles derived from Golgi complex in the cytoplasm (Fig. 3G-H) and electrondense
nucleus with euchromatin (Fig. 3I). The gastrodermal epithelium produces an
electrondense secretion that seems to give rise to the mesoglea found between and
inside the follicles (Fig. 3G-J). The follicular epithelium is composed of spermatogonia
62
(Fig. 4A) characterized by elongated nucleus with chromatin of intermediate
electrondensity and a prominent nucleolus (Fig. 4B). The spermatocytes are
characterized by rounded nucleus with chromatin of intermediate electrondensity or
they can be in meiosis (Fig. 4C). The sperm are concentrated in the central portion of
the follicle immersed in the electrondense mesoglea (Fig. 4D) or in a granular substance
(Fig. 4E). The sperm have an ampuliform shape, elongated nucleus with ratio 1.5 ± 0.21
(n=18), midpiece with six mitochondria and a long flagellum (Fig. 4D-L). In the
anterior region of the nucleus can be observed several electrondense vesicles (Fig. 4E)
and several ribosomes (Fig. 4F). The midpiece is wider than longer with ratio 0.47 ±
0.11 (n=16). The pericentriolar apparatus is anchored in the distal centriole (Fig. 4G- I)
and this last one is connected to the proximal centriole (Fig. 4H). In the pericentriolar
apparatus can be noted part of the electrondense primary process (Fig. 4I). The
flagellum is immersed in the mesoglea and has an axoneme with the typical
microtubules pattern 9+2 (Fig. 4K-L).
Ultrastructure of spermatogenesis in Chiropsalmus quadrumanus (Chiropsalmidae)
The male gonad of C. quadrumanus is characterized by several follicles
surrounded by a gastrodermal epithelium (Fig. 5A). The gastrodermal epithelium has
cells with irregular shape with cilia in the apical portion (Fig. 5A-B), electrondense
nucleus with euchromatin (Fig.5C), and several vesicles of granular material in the
cytoplasm (Fig. 5A-C). The gastrodermal epithelium produces an electrondense
secretion that seems to give rise to the mesoglea found between the follicles (Fig. 5A,
C-E). Between the mesoglea can be seen a granular secretion that is transported to the
large vesicles (Fig. 5D-E). The follicular epithelium is characterized by the presence of
spermatogonia (Fig. 5D) with elongated nucleus and prominent nucleolus (Fig. 5F). The
63
spermatocytes are located near the spermatogonia and are characterized by a rounded
nucleus (Fig. 5D) and can be in some stage of meiosis (Fig. 5G). The mature sperm is
released by rupture of the follicle wall (Fig. 5H). The sperm of C. quadrumanus is
immersed in a granular substance (Fig. A) and are longer than wider with ratio of 1.82 ±
0.18 (n=5). The sperm head has a bullet-shape with an elongated nucleus, midpiece with
six mitochondria and a long flagellum (Fig.6A-M). In the lateral region of the nucleus is
observed several electronlucid vesicles (Fig. 6C-D). In the anterior region of the nucleus
is observed several electrondense vesicles (Fig. 6E) and ribosome (Fig. 6E, H). The
midpiece is wider than longer with ratio 0.40 ± 0.10 (n= 8), and present a proximal and
distal centriole (Fig. 6G). The pericentriolar apparatus is anchored in the distal centriole
(Fig. 6G-J) and only the primary process could be observed (Fig. 6H). The flagellum
has an axoneme with the typical microtubules pattern 9+2 (Fig. 6L-M).
Histology and histochemistry of spermatogenesis in Carukia barnesi
(Carukiidae)
The male gonad of Carukia barnesi is a thin and laminar layer of tissue located
between the gastrodermis and the mesoglea (Fig. 7A). The male gonad present a
gastrodermal epithelium with elongated follicles (longitudinal section) adjacent and
juxtaposed one to another, characterizing the “fingerprint” pattern (Fig.7B-C). Between
the follicles lies the acidofilic mesoglea (Fig. 7B and C), strongly positive to acid
structures (Fig. 7D), positive to proteins (Fig. 7E), and strongly positive to neutral
polysaccharides (Fig. 7F). Inside these follicles spermatogenesis occurs, being a
synchronous process as we noted cells in the same stage of development (e.g. sperm in
Fig. 7B and spermatogonia in Fig. 7C). The gastrodermal epithelium present cells with
rounded basophilic nucleus and acidophilic cytoplasm. The epithelium has several
64
vesicles with negative reaction to hematoxylin and eosin in the cytoplasm (Fig. 7B-C).
The follicular epithelium is composed by the spermatogonia (Fig. 7G). In light
microscopy, during the spermiogenesis process, the spermatids reduce the cytoplasmic
volume turning into sperm (Fig. 7G-J). The sperm is immersed in a substance with no
reaction to hematoxylin and eosin, is characterized by a rounded head with basophilic
nucleus, an acidophilic midpiece and flagellum (Fig. 7G). The sperm head was strongly
reactive to acid structures (Fig. 7H) and proteins (Fig. 7I), but present negative reaction
to neutral polysaccharides (Fig. 7J). The substance in which the sperm is immersed
presented negative reaction to all stainings used (Fig. 7H-J).
Histology, Histochemistry and ultrastructure of spermatogenesis in Chironex fleckeri
(Chirodropidae)
As in Carukia barnesi, Chironex fleckeri present the male gonad characterized
by a gastrodermal epithelium with elongated follicles surrounded by the mesoglea in
longitudinal section (Fig. 8A). In transversal section (Fig. 8B) we observe the
gastrodermal epithelium with several vesicles with negative reaction to hematoxylin and
eosin (Fig. 8B-C). The follicular epithelium is composed of spermatogonia with
rounded basophilic nucleus and acidophilic cytoplasm. Beneath these cells are the
sperm with rounded head with basophilic nucleus, acidophilic midpiece and a long
acidophilic flagellum (Fig. 8C). The sperm is immersed in a substance with no reaction
to hematoxylin and eosin (Fig.8C), positive reaction to acid structures (Fig. 8D),
negative reaction to proteins (Fig. 8E-F) and neutral polysaccharides (Fig. 8G). The
sperm head present strongly reaction to acid structures (Fig. 8D), to proteins (Fig. 8E-
F), but does not present reactivity to neutral polysaccharides (Fig. 8G).
65
Under transmission electronic microscopy the gastrodermal epithelium is
characterized by cells with rounded nucleus with euchromatin and cytoplasm with large
vesicles with granular material of intermediate electrondensity (Fig. 9A-B). These cells
produce an electrondense secretion present in the small vesicles derived from the Golgi
complex (Fig. 9D). The follicular epithelium is a thin layer of spermatogonia and
adjacent to them is the sperm (Fig. 9B). The spermatogonia has rounded nucleus with
prominent nucleolus (Fig. 9C). All the sperm are concentrated in the center of the
follicle immersed in the electrondense mesoglea (Fig.9E) and have a bullet-shape head
longer than wider (1.48 ± 0.21, n=4). They have an electrondense elongated nucleus
with granular chromatin and can present tiny electrondense vesicles in the anterior
region of the nucleus (Fig. 9F-G). The midpiece is wider than longer with ratio 0.36 ±
0.09 (n=6) and have six mitochondria with several crests (Fig. 9G-H). The anchorage
apparatus of the flagellum is present and the distal centriole can be noted (Fig. 9G). All
flagella are clusttered and immersed in the electrondense mesoglea (Fig. 9I) and present
simple axoneme with the typical microtubules pattern 9+2 (Fig. 9J).
Histology, Histochemistry and Ultrastructure of spermatogenesis in Chiropsella bronzie
(Chirodropidae)
Chiropsella bronzie present a male gonad also organized in several elongated
follicles (in a longitudinal section) adjacent one to another (Fig. 10A-B), characterizing
the “fingerprint” pattern, and an external gastrodermal epithelium containing several
vesicles with negative reaction to hematoxylin and eosin (Fig. 10A-C). The
spermatogenesis is synchronous [one individual only with spermatogonia and
spermatocytes (Fig. 10A), and another individual only with sperm and spermatogonia
(Fig. 10B-C)]. The follicular epithelium is composed of spermatogonia – cells with
66
large, rounded and basophilic nucleus (Fig. 10C-D). There is no substance surrounding
the mass of sperm being this last one released by rupture of the follicular wall (Fig.
10D). It is noted a substance with no reaction to any histochemical compound between
the follicular epithelium (Fig. 10F-H). The sperm have rounded head with basophilic
nucleus, visible and acidophilic midpiece and long and acidophilic flagellum (Fig. 10E).
The sperm head has positive reaction to acid structures (Fig. 10F), proteins (Fig. 10G-
H), but present negative reaction to neutral polysaccharides (Fig.10I).
In the transmission electronic microscopy it is noted the gastrodermal epithelium
characterized by cells with rounded nucleus with euchromatin and cytoplasm with
several vesicles. Inside these large vesicles there is a granular material of low
electrondensity (Fig. 11A). The follicular epithelium has spermatogonia organized in
centers and just below them there is a bunch of sperm immersed in the electrondense
mesoglea (Fig. 11A-B). All the sperm are accumulated in the center of the follicle (Fig.
11B). The sperm head has an ovoid shape, is longer than wider with a ratio of 1.19 ±
0.24 (n=5) and have an electrondense elongated nucleus with granular chromatin. No
acrosome is apparent but there are tiny electrondense vesicles in above the nucleus (Fig.
11C). The midpiece is wider than longer with ratio of 0.35 ± 0.05 (n=10), present six
mitochondria with several crests and the anchorage apparatus (Fig. 11D). In cross
section it is visible six mitochondria, and the proximal centriole clearly lies among them
(Fig. 11E). The flagellum is immersed in the electrondense mesoglea and presents an
axoneme with the typical microtubules pattern of 9+2 (Fig.11F). The midpiece presents
the Golgi complex with several vesicles (Fig. 11G).
67
Discussion
For all studied species the gonadal structure is similar: the male gonad is a thin
and separate layer of tissue located near the mesoglea and gastrodermis. This
organization is also similar to that described for other cubozoan species like Carybdea
xaymacana (only description) (Conant 1898), Chironex fleckeri (Southcott 1956),
Carybdea marsupialis (Claus 1878; Avian et al. 1993; García-Rodriguez 2015), Alatina
alata and Morbakka virulenta (García-Rodriguez 2015), with the exception of Copula
sivickisi (García-Rodriguez 2015; Garm et al. 2015) in which the gonadal structure is
circular. With the exception of C. sivickisi (García-Rodriguez 2015; Garm et al. 2015)
all cubozoans already studied (including the five ones of this paper) present the male
gonad according to the general histological pattern presented by Tiseo et al. (2016) -
chapter one of this dissertation.
The male gonad present the “fingerprint” pattern in longitudinal section, in
which the follicles are surrounded by a gastrodermal epithelium with large vesicles with
negative reaction to all histochemical compounds tested (Table 1). These same vesicles,
in TEM, present a granular material (Table 2). In T. haplonema, C. quadrumanus, Ca.
barnesi and Ch. fleckeri a substance was observed inside the follicles between the sperm
that also presented negative reaction to the histochemical stainings and in TEM had a
granular aspect. In Chiropsella bronzie this substance is present only between the
follicles, and the sperm is immersed only in the electrondense mesoglea. Inside the
follicular epithelium of T. haplonema it was observed tiny vesicles transporting a
granular substance to the mesoglea and also some primary vesicles with granular
material fusing with the large vesicles found in the gastrodermal epithelium. We believe
that this transport of granular material from inside the follicle to the large vesicles in the
gastrodermal epithelium could be a residual of cytoplasmic material that is been
68
absorbed and stored until the end of the gonadal cycle. For all species here studied,
under TEM, the gastrodermal epithelium produces a homogeneous and electrondense
secretion that seems to give rise to the mesoglea. There is no published record of the
male gonad to produce the mesoglea, but this intermediate layer of tissue was already
described as an electrondense homogeneous matrix in the gonad of other cnidarians, as
Distichopora sp. (Hydrozoa, Sylasteridae) (Gaino et al. 2013).
Tiseo et al. (2016) - chapter one of this dissertation - described the different
stages of the gonadal maturation of T. haplonema and C. quadrumanus: Tamoya
haplonema have four stages of maturation and C. quadrumanus three. Southcott (1956)
and Avian et al. (1993) described a degree of gonadal maturity to Chironex fleckeri and
Carybdea marsupialis, respectively. For the Australian species here studied it was not
possible to describe the gonadal cycle because of the few number of male individuals
collected. Even we not describing the gonadal cycle of Carukia barnesi, Chironex
fleckeri and Chiropsella bronzie, like Tiseo et al. (2016) - chapter one of this
dissertation - stated to C. quadrumanus, it is supposed that a cycle of gonadal
maturation is present in all of them because of the observation of synchrony in sperm
production.
Here we report the release of sperm by rupture of the follicle wall for
Chiropsalmus quadrumanus (under TEM) and for Chiropsella bronzie (under light
microscopy). This strategy of sperm release was also reported for C. quadrumanus and
T. haplonema under light microscopy (García-Rodriguez 2015; Tiseo et al. 2016 -
chapter one of this dissertation), Chironex fleckeri (Southcott 1956; Yamaguchi and
Hartwick 1980), and Carybdea xaymacana (Conant 1898). Toshino et al. (2013)
reported unfertilized eggs and external fertilization to Morbakka virulenta suggesting
that the sperm is release in the water. García-Rodriguez (2015) described the sperm
69
release by spermatzeugmata to Alatina alata and in by a spermatophore for Copula
sivickisi. For Carukia barnesi and Chironex fleckeri it was not observed the sperm
release but the follicular structure with the sperm in the center and the flagellum
directed to one side, indicates the probable pole of follicles’ wall rupture.
The description of the spermatogenic process observed in the cubozoans studied
by us, is similar to the observed in scyphozoans (Morandini and Silveira 2001; Lucas
and Reed 2010; Ikeda et al. 2011b; Schiariti et al. 2012) and hydrozoans (Gaino et al.
2013). Gaino et al. (2013) also describes the spermatogonia as bulky cells, with nucleus
and nucleolus well developed and observed spermatocytes in meiosis with the
synaptonemal complex between homologous chromossomes visible. The spermatids
connected to each other forming cytoplasmic bridges was first described for the
scyphozoan Nemopilema nomurai (Ikeda et al. 2011a) and was also observed in
Distichopora sp (Gaino et al. 2013). Harrison and Jamieson (1988) noted evident
flagellum, and structures called collar in the spermatids posterior end of the midpiece
and this characteristics help us to differentiate the late spermatid to the sperm.
The knowledge about sperm morphology and their features can be linked to
systematics (spermiotaxonomy) and has been used as a support criterion for
phylogenetic inference in Cnidaria by some authors (Hinsch 1974; Miller 1983;
Harrison and Jamieson 1988; Corbelli et al. 2003). These studies can be used as a novel
approach and help further in resolving the relationships among the group. Several
authors (Miller 1983; Harrison and Jamieson 1988; Rouse and Pitt 2000; Corbelli et al.
2003) mentioned the presence of small vesicles, precursors of the acrosome, in the
anterior region of the sperm, in front of the nucleus (under TEM). Under light
microscopy, we could not observe such vesicles (using histochemistry) in the Australian
species, just like Tiseo et al. (2016) - chapter one of this dissertation - described for T.
70
haplonema and C. quadrumanus. But the presence of these vesicles in the TEM
micrographs, made us conclude that eventually their size was too small to express the
positive reaction to PAS.
Comparing the sperm morphology of the five Cubozoa studied with Carybdea
marsupialis (the only Cubozoa sperm available for comparison) some patterns and
slight differences could be noted (see Table 3 for details). With the exception of
Carukia barnesi, in which only histological samples were obtained, here we present the
main sperm morphology of all species. They all possess electrondense nucleus with
granular chromatin, electrondense vesicles in the anterior region of the nucleus, distal
centrioles, pericentriolar apparatus, six mitochondria in the midpiece and the typical
flagellum pattern 9+2 of microtubules. The main differences found were in the head
morphology (ampuliform in T. haplonema, ovoid in Carybdea marsupialis and
Chiropsella bronzie and bullet-shape in Chiropsalmus quadrumanus and Chironex
fleckeri), the presence or absence of the poli-ribosomes in the vestigial cytoplasm, the
presence or absence of Golgi complex and small vesicles in the midpiece. The proximal
centriole and the pericentriolar apparatus were not observed in Chironex fleckeri and
Chiropsella bronzie, but we strongly believe that these structures are present in both
species. They were not found in the cuts observed in the TEM, due to the difficulty to
separate only the sperm to analyze and in many different orientations. Corbelli et al.
(2003) described the existence of a “spurr” structure in the pericentriolar apparatus of
Carybdea marsupialis that was not observed in the species of this study. But, as already
explained we thought that maybe this could be due to an orientation resin block
problem. As no specific differences between the sperm of studied species were found,
maybe the sperm morphology, in a general way, is conserved at class level, at least for
cubozoans. Some interesting features are shared with representatives of other classes.
71
The presence of poli-ribosomes in the cytoplasm in Tamoya haplonema, Chiropsalmus
quadrumanus and Chironex fleckeri is shared with the hydroid Tubularia larynx
(Afzelius 1971) and the connection between the proximal and distal centriole observed
in T. haplonema is a characteristic of Anthozoa sperm (Harrison and Jamieson 1988).
Concluding, the male gonadal structure, the probable gonadal cycle and the
spermatogenesis process, in all species here studied, is similar. The sperm general
morphology of all cubozoans here described is very similar with some punctual
differences in the sperm head morphology and presence or absence of some organelles.
Acknoledgements
This work was supported by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [GRT grants
2012/19080-1 and 2014/08785-1, ACM grants 2010/50174-7, 2011/50242-5,
2013/50484-4]; CAPES [ACM 23038.004309/2014-51]; and CNPq [ACM
(301039/2013-5, 486337/2013-8)]. Thanks are due to Lea Taylor, Maxine Daves and
Waldir Caldeira for all help in the transmission electronic microscopy and to Robert
Courtney and Sally Browning for help in the collects. Thanks are also due to
anonymous reviewers for all comments and suggestions. This is a contribution of NP-
BioMar, USP. This study was conducted in accordance with Brazilian laws (GRT
SisBio license No. 611377-9; ACM MMA SisBio permanent license No. 15031-2).
References
Afzelius BA (1971) Fine structure of the spermatozoon of Tubularia larynx (Hydrozoa,
coelenterata). J Ultrastruct Res 37:679–689. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5320(71)80031-X
Audino JA, Marian JEAR, Wanninger A, Lopes SGBC (2015) Development of the pallial
eye in Nodipecten nodosus (Mollusca: Bivalvia): insights into early visual performance
72
in scallops. Zoomorphology 134:403–415. doi: 10.1007/s00435-015-0265-8
Avian M, Bonivento P, Montanari G, et al (1993) Carybdea marsupialis L. (Cubozoa),
istologia delle gonadi. Biol Mar Suppl Notiz SIBM 1:75–78.
Bentlage B, Cartwright P, Yanagihara AA, et al (2010) Evolution of box jellyfish (Cnidaria:
Cubozoa), a group of highly toxic invertebrates. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 277:493–501.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1707
Bentlage B, Lewis C (2012) An illustrated key and synopsis of the families and genera of
carybdeid box jellyfishes (Cnidaria: Cubozoa: Carybdeida), with emphasis on the
“Irukandji family” (Carukiidae). J Nat Hist 46:2595–2620. doi:
10.1080/00222933.2012.717645
Claus C (1878) Ueber Charybdea marsupialis. Arb aus dem Zool Inst der Univ Wien 1:1–
56.
Conant FS (1898) The cubomedusae. Johns Hopkins University
Corbelli A, Avian M, Marotta R, Ferraguti M (2003) The spermatozoon of Carybdea
marsupialis (Cubozoa, Cnidaria). Invertebr Reprod Dev 43:95–104. doi:
10.1080/07924259.2003.9652528
Dawson MN (2005) Incipient speciation of Catostylus mosaicus (Scyphozoa, Rhizostomeae,
Catostylidae), comparative phylogeography and biogeography in south-east Australia. J
Biogeogr 32:515–533. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01193.x
Fenner PJ, Hadok JC (2002) Fatal envenomation by jellyfish causing Irukandji syndrome.
Med J Aust 177:362–363.
Franzén A (1956) On spermiogenesis. morphology of the spermatozoon, and biology of
fertilization among invertebrates. Zool Bidr Uppsala 31:355–482.
Gaino E, Scoccia F, Makapedua DM, et al (2013) Some spermatogenic steps in Distichopora
sp. (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa, Stylasteridae): ultrastructural aspects. Zoomorphology
73
132:121–128. doi: 10.1007/s00435-012-0182-z
García-Rodriguez J (2015) Anatomia associada ao comportamento reprodutivo de Cubozoa.
Universidade de São Paulo
Garm A, Lebouvier M, Tolunay D (2015) Mating in the Box Jellyfish Copula sivickisi —
Novel Function of Cnidocytes. J Morphol 276:1055–1064. doi: 10.1002/jmor.20395
Gershwin L (2005) Taxonomy and Phylogeny of Australian Cubozoa. James Cook
University
Gershwin L (2006) Comments on Chiropsalmus (Cnidaria: Cubozoa: Chirodropida): a
preliminary revision of the Chiropsalmidae, with descriptions of two new genera and
two new species. Zootaxa 42:1–42.
Gershwin L, Kingsford MJ (2008) Pelagic Cnidaria and Ctenophora. In: Hutchings P,
Kingsford M, Hoegh-Guldberg O (eds) he Great Barrier Reef: Biology, Environment
and Management. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp 188–198
Haddad V, da Silveira FL, Cardoso JLC, Morandini AC (2002) A report of 49 cases of
cnidarian envenoming from southeastern Brazilian coastal waters. Toxicon 40:1445–
1450. doi: 10.1016/S0041-0101(02)00162-9
Harrison PL, Jamieson B (1988) Cnidaria and Ctenophora. In: Adiyodi KG, Adiyod RG
(eds) Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates. Vol IX Part A, Progress in Male Gamete
Ultrastructure and Phylogeny. Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 21–95
Hartwick RF (1991) Observations on the anatomy, behavior, reproduction and life-cycle of
the cubozoan Carybdea sivickisi. Hydrobiologia 216/217:171–179. doi: 10.1007/978-
94-011-3240-4
Hinsch GW (1974) Comparative ultrastructure of cnidarian sperm. Am Zool 14:457–465.
doi: 10.1093/icb/14.2.457
Hinsch GW, Clarck Jr. WH (1973) Comaparative Fine Structure of cnidaria Spermatozoa.
74
Biol Reprod 8:62–73.
Ikeda H, Ohtsu K, Uye S (2011a) Structural changes of gonads during artificially induced
gametogenesis and spawning in the giant jellyfish Nemopilema nomurai (Scyphozoa:
Rhizostomeae). J Mar Biol Assoc United Kingdom 91:215–227. doi:
10.1017/S0025315410001244
Ikeda H, Ohtsu K, Uye SI (2011b) Fine structure, histochemistry, and morphogenesis during
excystment of the podocysts of the giant jellyfish Nemopilema nomurai (Scyphozoa,
Rhizostomeae). Biol Bull 221:248–260.
Junqueira LCU, Junqueira LMMS (1983) Técnicas Básicas de Citologia e Histologia.
Editora Santos, São Paulo
Karnovsky MJ (1965) A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of hight osmolality for use in
electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 27:137–138.
Kingsford MJ, Seymour JE, O’Callaghan MD (2012) Abundance patterns of cubozoans on
and near the Great Barrier Reef. Hydrobiologia 690:257–268. doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-
1041-0
Kramp PL (1961) Synopsis of the medusae of the world. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 40:7–469.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400007347
Lewis C, Kubota S, Migotto AE, Collins AG (2008) Sexually Dimorphic Cubomedusa
Carybdea sivickisi (Cnidaria: Cubozoa) in Seto, Wakayama, Japan. Publ Seto Mar Biol
Lab 40:1–8.
Lewis C, Long TAF (2005) Courtship and reproduction in Carybdea sivickisi (Cnidaria :
Cubozoa). Mar Biol 147:477–483. doi: 10.1007/s00227-005-1602-0
Lucas CH, Reed AJ (2010) Gonad morphology and gametogenesis in the deep-sea jellyfish
Atolla wyvillei and Periphylla periphylla ( Scyphozoa : Coronatae ) collected from Cape
Hatteras and the Gulf of Mexico. J Mar Biol Assoc United Kingdom 90:1095–1104.
75
doi: 10.1017/S0025315409000824
Marques AC, García J, Lewis Ames C (2015) Internal fertilization and sperm storage in
cnidarians: a response to Orr and Brennan. Trends Ecol Evol 30:435–436. doi:
10.1016/j.tree.2015.06.002
Marques AC, Morandini AC, Migotto AE (2003) Synopsis of knowledge on Cnidaria
Medusozoa from Brazil. Biota Neotrop 3:1–18.
Mayer AG (1910) Medusae of the world Volume III The Scyphomedusae. Carnegie
Institution of Washington, Washington
Mello MLS, Vidal B de C (1980) Práticas de Biologia Celular. Editora Edgar Blücher -
FUNCAMP, Campinas
Mianzan HW, Cornelius PFS (1999) Cubomedusae and Scyphomedusae. In: Boltovskoy D
(ed) South Atlantic Zooplankton Vol 1. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 513–559
Miller RL (1983) Cnidaria. In: Adiyodi KG, Adiyodi RG (eds) Reproductive Biology of
Invertebrates. Vol II Spermatogenesis and Sperm Function. Wiley & Sons, New York,
pp 23–69
Morandini AC, Ascher D, Stampar SN, Ferreira JF V. (2005) Cubozoa e Scyphozoa
(Cnidaria: Medusozoa) de águas costeiras do Brasil. Iheringia Série Zool 95:281–294.
doi: 10.1590/S0073-47212005000300008
Morandini AC, Silveira FL Da (2001) Sexual reproduction of Nausithoe aurea ( Scyphozoa ,
Coronatae ). Gametogenesis, egg release, embryonic development, and gastrulation*.
Sci Mar 65:139–149. doi: 10.3989/scimar.2001.65n2139
Pearse A (1960) Histochemistry: Theorical and Applied. J&A Churchill, London
Rouse GW, Pitt K (2000) Ultrastructure of the sperm of Catostylus mosaicus and Phyllorhiza
punctata (Scyphozoa, Cnidaria): Implications for sperm terminology and the inference
of reproductive mechanisms. Invertebr Reprod Dev 38:23–34.
76
Sant’Anna B, Turra A, Zara F (2010) Simultaneous activity of male and female gonads in
intersex hermit crabs. Aquat Biol 10:201–209. doi: 10.3354/ab00283
Schiariti A, Christiansen E, Morandini AC, et al (2012) Reproductive biology of
Lychnorhiza lucerna (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa: Rhizostomeae): Individual traits related to
sexual reproduction. Mar Biol Res 8:255–264. doi: 10.1080/17451000.2011.616897
Southcott RV (1956) Studies on Australian Cubomedusae, including a new genus and
species apparently harmful to man. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 7:254–283.
Straehler-Pohl I, Garm A, Morandini AC (2014) Sexual dimorphism in Tripedaliidae
(Conant 1897) (Cnidaria, Cubozoa, Carybdeida). Zootaxa 3785:533. doi:
10.11646/zootaxa.3785.4.3
Thiel ME (1936) Ordnung Cubomedusae. In: Bronns DHG (ed) Klassen und ordnungen des
Tierreichs. Zweiter Band: Spongiaria, Coelenterata, Echinodermata, II: Abteilung:
Coelenterata, 2 Buch Scyphomedusae, 2. Lieferung. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft
m. b. H, Leipzig, pp 173–308
Tibballs J (2006) Australian venomous jellyfish, envenomation syndromes, toxins and
therapy. Toxicon 48:830–859. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.07.020
Tiseo GR, Zara FJ, Mantelatto FL (2014) Is cleistospermy and coenospermy related to sperm
transfer? A comparative study of the male reproductive system of Pachygrapsus
transversus and Pachygrapsus gracilis (Brachyura: Grapsidae). J Crustac Biol 34:704–
716. doi: 10.1163/1937240X-00002275
Toshino S, Miyake H, Ohtsuka S, et al (2013) Development and polyp formation of the giant
box jellyfish Morbakka virulenta (Kishinouye , 1910) (Cnidaria: Cubozoa) collected
from the Seto Inland Sea, western Japan. Plankt Benthos Res 8:1–8. doi:
10.3800/pbr.8.1
Werner B (1973a) New Investigations on Systematics and Evolution of the Class Scyphozoa
77
and the Phylum Cnidaria. Publ Seto Mar Biol Lab 20:35–61. doi:
10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Werner B (1973b) Spermatozeugmen und Paarungsverhalten bei Tripedalia cystophora
(Cubomedusae). Mar Biol 18:212–217. doi: 10.1007/BF00367987
Williamson JA, Fenner PJ, Burnett JW, Rifkin JF (1996) Venomous & Poisonous Marine
Animals: A Medical and Biological Handbook. Surf Life Saving Australia and
University of New South Wales Press, Sydney
Yamaguchi M, Hartwick R (1980) Early Life history of the sea wasp, Chironex fleckeri
(Class Cubozoa). In: Tardent P, Tardent R (eds) Development and cellular biology of
coelenterates. Elsevier, Amsterdam, North-Holland, pp 11–16
Zara FJ, Toyama MH, Caetano FH, López-Greco LS (2012) Spermatogenesis,
Spermatophore, and Seminal Fluid Production in the Adult Blue Crab Callinectes danae
(Portunidae). J Crustac Biol 32:249–262. doi: 10.1163/193724011X615479
78
Tables
Table 1: Secretions and sperm histochemistry of Tamoya haplonema, Chiropsalmus quadrumanus, Carukia barnesi, Chironex fleckeri
and Chiropsella bronzie.
Histochemical Technique References
Toluidine Blue
(Acids
structures)
Bromophenol
blue (basic
proteins)
Ponceau xylidine
(total proteins)
PAS (neutral
polysaccharides)
Tamoya
haplonema
Secretion of the vesicles of
gastrodermal epithelium - - - -
Tiseo et al.
2016
(chapter 1)
Sperm head +++ +++ - -
Flagellum + ++ + +
Substance inside the follicles - - - -
Chiropsalmus
quadrumanus
Secretion of the vesicles of
gastrodermal epithelium - - - -
Tiseo et al.
2016
(chapter 1)
Sperm head +++ +++ - -
Flagellum + ++ + +
Substanceinside the follicles - - - -
79
Carukia
barnesi
Secretion of the vesicles of
gastrodermal epithelium - - - -
This study Sperm head +++ +++ - -
Flagellum ++ ++ + +
Substance inside the follicles - - - -
Chironex
fleckeri
Secretion of the vesicles of
gastrodermal epithelium - - - -
This study Sperm head +++ +++ - -
Flagellum ++ ++ + +
Substance inside the follicles - + - -
Chiropsella
bronzie
Secretion of the vesicles of
gastrodermal epithelium - - - -
This study Sperm head +++ +++ - -
Flagellum ++ ++ + +
Substance inside the follicles Absent Absent Absent Absent
+++ = strongly positive; ++ = positive; + = weakly positive; − = negative.
80
Table 2: Composition of secretions and substances found in Transmission Electronic Microscopy.
Transmission Electronic Microscopy
(TEM)
Tamoya haplonema
Secretion of the vesicles of gastrodermal
epithelium Granular
Substance inside the follicles Granular substance; Mesoglea (electrondense)
Chiropsalmus
quadrumanus
Secretion of the vesicles of gastrodermal
epithelium Granular
Substance inside the follicles Granular substance; Mesoglea (electrondense)
Carukia barnesi
Secretion of the vesicles of gastrodermal
epithelium Granular
Substance inside the follicles Granular substance; Mesoglea (electrondense)
Chironex fleckeri
Secretion of the vesicles of gastrodermal
epithelium Granular
Substance inside the follicles Granular substance; Mesoglea (electrondense)
Chiropsella bronzie
Secretion of the vesicles of gastrodermal
epithelium Granular
Substance inside the follicles Mesoglea (electrondense)
81
Table 3: Comparison between the sperm of Tamoya haplonema, Chiropsalmus quadrumanus, Carukia barnesi, Chironex fleckeri and
Chiropsella bronzie with other Cubozoa described in the literature.
Cubozoa Class
Carybdeida Chirodropida
Characteristics Tamoya
haplonema 1
Carukia
barnesi 1
Carybdea
marsupials 2
Chiropsalmus
quadrumanus 1
Chironex
fleckeri 1
Chiropsella
bronzie 1
Head length 3.7 ± 0.41 - 3.84 ± 0.34 2.98 ± 0.28 2.47 ± 0.17 2.73 ± 0.42
Head diameter 2.54 ± 0.24 - - 1.82 ± 0.16 1.95 ± 0.25 2.38 ± 0.38
Midpiece length 1.03 ± 0.23 - 1.1 0.73 ± 0.14 0.68 ± 0.14 0.78 ± 0.08
Midpiece diameter 2.23 ± 0.20 - 2.41 ±0.36 1.87 ± 0.25 1.99 ± 0.27 2.18 ± 0.30
Nucleus length 3.4 ± 0.48 - 2.83 ± 0.27 2.75 ± 0.29 2.23 ± 0.23 2.48 ± 0.4
Nucleus diameter 2.21 ± 0.19 - 1.84 ± 0.27 1.57 ± 0.14 1.59 ± 0.04 2.1 ± 0.32
Head morphology Ampuliform a Ovoid
b Ovoid
b? Bullet-shaped
c Bullet-shaped
c Ovoid
b
Nucleus ratio 1.5 ± 0.21 - 1.54 1.82 ± 0.18 1.48 ± 0.21 1.19 ± 0.24
Nuclear vesicle Absent a - Absent
a? Absent
a Absent
a Absent
a
Chromatin Granular a - Granular
a? Granular
a Granular
a Granular
a
Outer nuclear membrane Absent a - Absent
a? Absent
a Absent
a Absent
a
Number of Mitochondria 6 a - 6
a 6
a 6
a 6
a
Vesicles anteriorly to the
nucleus Present
a - Present
a Present
a Present
a Present
a
Vesicles diameter 0.09 ± 0.03 - - 0.09 ± 0.01 0.15 ± 0.009 0.12 ± 0.023
Proximal centriole Present a*
- Present a Present
a* Not observed
b* Not observed
b*
82
Distal centriole Present a - Present
a Present
a Present
a Present
a
Pericentriolar apparatus Present a - Present
a Present
a Present
a Present
a
Primary process Present a*
- Present a Present
a* Not observed
b* Not observed
b*
Interprimary process Present a - Present
a Present
a Not observed
b* Not observed
b*
Major striated bands Absent a*
- Present b Absent
c* Not observed
c* Not observed
c*
Secondary process Not observed a*
- Present b Not observed
a* Not observed
a* Not observed
a*
Tertiary Process Not observed a*
- Present b Not observed
a* Not observed
a* Not observed
a*
Spurr Not observed a*
- Present b Not observed
a* Not observed
a* Not observed
a*
Lamellas Absent a - Absent
a? Absent
a* Absent
a* Absent
a*
Poli-ribosomes Present a*
- Absent b?
Present a*
Present a*
Not observed b*
Golgi complex Absent a*
- Absent a?
Absent a*
Absent a*
Present b*
Vesicles in the midpiece Not observed a*
- Present b Not observed
a* Not observed
a* Present
b*
Structure of the flagellum 9 + 2 - 9 + 2 9 + 2 9 + 2 9 + 2
1 This study;
2 Corbelli (2003).
Different letter indicate variation between the species; * = difference only between the species of the present study; ? = Not described
and observed in the published figure.
83
List of Figures
Figure 1
Figure 1: Sampling sites at the Brazilian coast. (A) Ubatuba (north) and Cananéia (south) counties in the coast of São Paulo state.
84
Figure 2
Figure 2: Sampling sites at the Australian coast. (A) All three points of collection in the north of Queensland State. (B) Pourt Douglas. (C) Double Island Reef. (D) South Mission Beach and Tully
Heads.
85
Figure 3
Figure 3: Ultrastructure of male gonad in Tamoya haplonema. (A) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Histology of the male gonad highlighting the germinal epithelium with several large vesicles and the follicles filled with sperm. B) Gastrodermal epithelium cells, under transmission electronic microscopy,
with several large vesicles containing granular secretion (C) Detail of the large vesicles in the cytoplasm of the gastrodermal epithelium that extends
to the follicles. (D) Detail of the vesicles (black arrowhead) originated in the follicular epithelium. (E) Detail of the granular substance immersed in the mesoglea, found between the follicles. (F) Small vesicles with granular substance funding with the large vesicles of granular material. (G) Golgi
complex producing small vesicles (white arrowhead) with the electrondese material that seems to give rise to the mesoglea. (H) Detail of the Golgi
complex with the electrondense vesicles. (I) Detail of the nucleus and thin portion of cytoplasm of gastrodermal epithelium with electrondense vesicles (arrowhead). (J) General view of the follicular epithelium surrounded by the mesoglea. Cillia (c); Follicular epithelium (ef); Follicle (F);
Gastrodermal epithelium (Ge); Golgi complex (gc); Mitochondria (M); Mesoglea (Me); Nucleus (N); Substance (Su); Spermatogonia (sg); sperm (sz);
gastrodermal epithelium; vesicle (v).
86
Figure 4
Figure 4: Spermatogenesis in Tamoya haplonema. (A) Detail of the gastrodermal epithelium with cilia in the apical region. At the follicular epithelium can be noted the spermatogonia and the sperm immersed in the mesoglea. (B) Detail of the spermatogonia. (C) Detail of the spermatocyte
in meiosis (D) General morphology of the sperm (longitudinal section). (E) Electrondense vesicles (arrowhead) in the anterior region of the sperm
head. (F) Detail of the poliribosomes (arrowhead) found in the anterior region of the sperm head. (G) Longitudinal section of the midpiece highlighting the pericentriolar apparatus (arrowhead). (H) Longitudinal section of the midpiece highlighting the connection (arrowhead) between the
proximal and distal centriole. (I) Cross section of the midpiece highlighting the pericentriolar apparatus (arrowhead). (J) Cross section of the midpiece
with six mitochondria. (K) Longitudinal section of the flagellum. (L) Cross section of the flagellum. The arrowhead indicates the microtubules duplete. Cillia (c); Follicle (F); flagellum (f); Gastrodermal epithelium (Ge); Golgi complex (gc); Mitochondria (M); Mesoglea (Me); Nucleus (N);
Nucleolus (nu); spermatogonia (sg); Spermatocyte (sc); sperm (sz); Substance (Su); vesicle (v).
87
Figure 5
Figure 5: Ultrastructure of male gonad in Chiropsalmus quadrumanus. (A) Cells of the gastrodermal epithelium, under transmission electronic
microscopy, with several large vesicles containing granular secretion. (B) Detail of the apical portion of the gastrodermal epithelium with cilia. (C)
Detail of the Golgi complex with the electrondense vesicles. (D) Two follicles immersed in the electrondense mesoglea. Between them can be noted the granular substance. (E) Detail of the granular substance (arrowhead) immersed in the mesoglea, found between the follicles. (F) Detail of the
spermatogonia. (G) Detail of the spermatocyte in telophase. (H) Release of the sperm by rupture of the follicle wall. Cillia (c); Follicle (F); Follicular
epithelium (Fe); Gastrodermal epithelium (Ge); Golgi complex (gc); Mitochondria (M); Mesoglea (Me); Nucleus (N); Nucleolus (nu); sperm (sz); vesicle (v).
88
Figure 6
Figure 6: Spermatogenesis in Chiropsalmus quadrumanus. (A) Several sperm inside the follicle. (B) General morphology of the sperm (longitudinal
section). (C) Detail of the small vesicles in the lateral of the nucleus. (D) Detail of the small vesicles near the midpiece. (E) Electrondense vesicle in the anterior region of the sperm head. (F) Longitudinal section of the midpiece highlighting the pericentriolar apparatus (arrowhead). (G) Longitudinal
section of the midpiece showing the proximal and distal centrioles. (H) Cross section of the midpiece highlighting the pericentriolar apparatus and the poli-ribosomes in the cytoplasm (arrowhead). (I) Detail of the pericentriolar apparatus. (J) Longitudinal section of the midpiece highlighting the
pericentriolar apparatus (arrowhead). (K) Cross section of the midpiece with six mitochondria. (L) Longitudinal section of the flagellum. (M) Cross
section of the flagellum. Primary process (1); Distal centriole (d); Flagellum (f); Mitochondria (M); Nucleus (N); Proximal centriole (p); Pericentriolar apparatus (pa); Sperm (sz); Substance (Su); vesicle (v).
89
Figure 7
Figure 7: Spermatogenesis in Carukia barnesi. (A) General gonad location. (B) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Longitudinal section of a rudimentary
gonad. The black arrow indicates the vesicles in the gastrodermal epithelium and the white arrow the substance inside the follicles. (C) Hematoxylin
and Eosin. Longitudinal section of a mature gonad, highlighting the “fingerprint” pattern. The black arrow indicates the vesicles in the gastrodermal epithelium and the white arrow the substance inside the follicles. (D) Toluidine Blue. Detail of gastrodermal epithelium with the follicles immersed in
the mesoglea positive to acid compounds. In the black arrow the gastrodermal vesicles with negative reaction to acid compounds. (E) Mercuric
Bromophenol Blue. In the gastrodermal epithelium is noted several vesicles that show negative reaction to the staining (black arrow). (F) PAS. The same mesoglea has positive reaction to neutral polysaccharides, but the vesicles in the gastrodermal epithelium does not. (G) The sperm present a
basophilic head and acidophilic midpiece and flagellum. The black arrow shows that the substance inside the follicle has negative reaction to the
staining. The sperm have positive reaction to Toluidine Blue (H), to basic proteins (I), not presenting reaction to PAS (J). In the black arrow note the substance with negative reaction to all staining. Follicle (F), Gastrodermal epithelium (Ge), Gonad (Go); Mesoglea (Me); Spermatogonia (sg), Sperm
(sz).
90
Figure 8
Figure 8: Spermatogenesis in Chironex fleckeri. (A) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Longitudinal section of the male gonad, highlighting the “fingerprint”
pattern. The black arrow indicates the substance inside the follicles with no reaction to the staining. B) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Cross section of the male gonad. The black arrow indicates the vesicles in the gastrodermal epithelium with no reaction to the staining. The white arrow indicates the
substance inside the follicles with no reaction to the staining (C) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Detail of the residual cytoplasmic substance inside the
follicle (black arrow) and the vesicles in the gastrodermal epithelium (white arrow), both with no reaction to the staining. (D) Toluidine Blue. Detail of the substance inside the follicle (black arrow) with positive reaction to acid compounds. (E) Mercuric Bromophenol Blue. The substance inside the
follicles has negative reaction to basic proteins and the sperm head positive. (F) Ponceau Xylidine. The substance inside the follicles has negative
reaction to total proteins and the sperm head positive. (G) PAS. The secretion inside the follicles and the sperm head have negative reaction to neutral polysaccharides. Follicle (F), Gastrodermal epithelium (Ge), Mesoglea (M); spermatogonia (sg), Sperm (sz).
91
Figure 9
Figure 9: Ultrastructure of spermatogenesis in Chironex fleckeri. (A) General view of the gastrodermal and follicular epithelium. The arrow indicates the granular secretion inside the large vesicles of the gastrodermal epithelium. (B) Detail of the previous image indicating the large vesicles of the
gastrodermal epithelium (arrow). Between the gastrodermal epithelium and the follicular epithelium exists a substance of granular aspect. (C) Detail
of the follicular epithelium, with spermatogonia and the substance of granular aspect between the gastrodermal epithelium and the follicular epithelium. (D) Detail of the Golgi complex with vesicles of electrondense material. (E) Sperm clustered in the center of the follicle. (F)
Electrondense vesicles in the anterior region of the sperm head (arrow). (G) Detail of the pericentriollar apparatus and the distal centriole in
longitudinal section. (H) Cross section of the mitochondria. (I) Cross section of the flagellum. (J) Detail of the anterior micrograph highlighting the flagellum organization. Distal centriole (d); Follicle (F); Follicular epithelium (Fe); flagellum (f); Gastrodermal epithelium (Ge); Golgi complex (gc);
Mesoglea (Me); Mitochondria (M); Nucleus (N); Nucleolus (nu); Substance (Su); Spermatogonia (sg); sperm (sz).
92
Figure 10
Figure 10: Spermatogenesis in Chiropsella bronzie. (A) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Longitudinal section of a rudimentary gonad highlighting the
“fingerprint” pattern. The arrow indicates the vesicles in the gastrodermal epithelium. (B) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Longitudinal section of a mature
gonad. The arrow indicates the vesicles in the gastrodermal epithelium. (C) Cross section of the male gonad. In the follicular epithelium note the spermatogonia with an elongated nucleus and organized in more than one layer. The arrow indicates the vesicles in the gastrodermal epithelium. (D)
Sperm being released by rupture of the follicle wall (arrow). (E) In the gastrodermal epithelium is noted several vesicles that shown negative reaction
to the staining (black arrow). (F) Toluidine blue. Detail of the substance (arrow) founded between the follicles and with no reaction to acid compounds. (G) Mercuric bromophenol blue. The sperm head present positive reaction to basic proteins (H) Ponceau Xylidine. The sperm head
present positive reaction to total proteins. The arrow indicates the substance with negative reaction to the staining. (I) PAS. The sperm head present
negative reaction to neutral polysaccharides. Follicle (F), Gastrodermal epithelium (Ge), Spermatogonia (sg), Spermatocyte (sc), Sperm (sz).
93
Figure 11
Figure 11: Ultrastructure of spermatogenesis in Chiropsella bronzie. (A) General view of the gastrodermal and follicular epithelium. The black arrow indicates the large vesicles with granular material and the white arrow the mesoglea. (B) General view of the mature follicle. The white arrow
indicates the mesoglea. (C) Electrondense vesicles in the anterior region of the sperm head (arrow). (D) Detail of the pericentriolar apparatus (arrow)
in longitudinal section. In the arrowheads note the small vesicles in the midpiece. (E) Cross section of the mitochondria. The arrow indicates the pericentriolar apparatus between the mitochondria. (F) Cross section of the flagellum. (G) In the cytoplasm is observed the presence of the Golgi
complex. Distal centriole (d); Follicle (F); flagellum (f); Gastrodermal epithelium (Ge); Golgi complex (gc); Mitochondria (M); Nucleus (N); sperm
(sz).
94
Capítulo 3
Histochemistry and ultrastructure of spermatogenesis in Chrysaora lactea,
Lychnorhiza lucerna and Cassiopea sp.
Gisele R. Tiseo1*
; Fernando J. Zara2; Peter L. Harrison
3, Jamie Seymour
4 and
André Carrara Morandini1
1 Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua
do Matão, travessa. 14, n. 101, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo CEP 05508-090, SP,
Brazil;
2 Departamento de Biologia Aplicada, Laboratório de Morfologia do Invertebrados
(IML), Centro de Aquicultura (CAUNESP) e IEAMar, Univ. Estadual Paulista
(UNESP), Prof. Donato Castellane, S/N, Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil;
3 Marine Ecology Research Centre, School of Environment, Science and Engineering,
Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, 2480, Lismore, NSW, Australia;
4 Australian Institute for Tropical Health and Medicine, Centre for Biodiscovery &
Molecular Development of Therapeutics, Division of Tropical Health and Medicine,
James Cook University, Cairns Campus, Mcgregor Road, 4878, Cairns, Australia.
Running Title: Spermatogenesis of some Scyphozoa species
*Corresponding author. GRT, Tel: +55 11 30917621; +55 11 973084694
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (GRT); [email protected] (FJZ);
[email protected] (PLH); [email protected] (JS);
[email protected] (ACM).
95
Abstract
Here is described the spermatogenesis of Chrysaora lactea, Lychnorhiza lucerna and
Cassiopea sp. under light microscopy, histochemistry and ultrastructure. Specimens of
C. lactea and L. lucerna were collected in four localities in São Paulo coast, SE Brazil.
Polyps from Cassiopea sp. were collected in Weipa County, Queensland, Australia, and
maintained in tanks until the jellyfishes develop gonads. For light microscopy, the male
gonad was removed and fixed in paraformaldehyde 4% in sodium phosphate buffer
0,2M (pH 7, 2) for 24 hours and posteriorly processed for protocol in historesin. Serial
sections were performed and were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and techniques
for proteins (mercuric bromophenol blue and ponceau xylidine), acid materials
(toluidine blue) and neutral polysaccharides (PAS). For transmission electronic
microscopy (TEM) fragments of 1mm3 of the male gonad were preserved in Karnovsky
solution (2.5% glutaraldehyde with 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate
buffer, pH 7.4, 2.5 mM of CaCl2 and saccharose) or in Glutaraldehyde fixative solution
(2.5% glutaraldehyde 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffered Millipore filtered seawater, pH
7.2-7.4) posteriorly processed for protocol in TEM. The male gonad of C. lactea, L.
lucerna and Cassiopea sp. is composed of a folded germinal epithelium divided in two
layers: the external and internal. The spermatogenesis is asynchronous in C. lactea and
L. lucerna and synchronous in Cassiopea sp. The spermatogonia are located in the
periphery of the follicle, and are bulky with prominent nucleolus. The spermatocytes
have rounded nucleus and meiotic figures could be seen. The spermatids are connected
by intercellular bridges and the sperm are located in the center of the follicles. In C.
lactea and L. lucerna the sperm are release by rupture of the follicle wall. On the
contrary, Cassiopea sp. releases sperm in spermatozeugmata. The sperm of all species
have electrondense nucleus, little electrondense vesicles above the nucleus and in the
96
midpiece, have four mitochondria, proximal and distal centrioles and pericentriolar
apparatus. The flagellum has the typical microtubules pattern 9+2.
Key-words: Spermatogenesis, Scyphozoa, jellyfish, Histology, TEM.
Introduction
The phylum Cnidaria is composed of two monophyletic subphyla: Anthozoa and
Medusozoa. Among Medusozoa there are the classes Hydrozoa, Staurozoa, Cubozoa
and Scyphozoa, being this last one composed of the so-called true jellyfishes (Bridge et
al. 1995; Odorico and Miller 1997; Collins 2002; Collins et al. 2006; Daly et al. 2007;
Collins 2009; Kayal et al. 2013; Zapata et al. 2015). From the 200 scyphozoans
distributed around the world, only 22 are found in Brazil and 38 in Australia (Mianzan
and Cornelius 1999; Marques et al. 2003; Gershwin and Zeidler 2008). The
scyphozoans Lychnorhiza lucerna and Cassiopea sp. belongs to the order
Rhizostomeae, while the species Chrysaora lactea belongs to the order Semaeostomeae
(Kramp 1961; Marques et al. 2003; Morandini et al. 2005; Morandini and Marques
2010). Chrysaora lactea is one of the 16 species of the genus distributed in the Gulf of
Mexico, and from Caribbean to Argentina (Morandini and Marques 2010). Lychnorhiza
lucerna is one of the three species of the genus (Kramp 1961; Morandini et al. 2005;
Morandini 2009) being endemic to Western South Atlantic (Morandini et al. 2005;
Schiariti et al. 2012). Cassiopea sp. is a benthic jellyfish with wide distribution in
shallow tropical coastal waters exhibiting the behavior of rest upside down on the
substrate and possesses endosymbiotic dinoflagellates (zooxanthellae) (Templeman and
Kingsford 2010; Morandini et al. 2016).
Despite the several studies related to reproductive biology of Scyphozoa
(Afzelius and Franzén 1971; Lucas and Lawes 1998; Rouse and Pitt 2000; Morandini
97
and Silveira 2001; Hofmann and Hadfield 2002; Lucas and Reed 2010), there are a few
works describing the spermatogenesis if considering the scyphozoan species diversity.
The spermatogenesis was already described for some species of the orders Coronatae
and Rhizostomeae (Kikinger 1992; Morandini and Silveira 2001; Lucas and Reed 2010;
Tiemann and Jarms 2010; Ikeda et al. 2011a; Schiariti et al. 2012).
Most scyphozoan are gonochoric but there are some cases of hermaphroditism
(Berrill 1949; Widersten 1965; Fautin 1992). The Semaeostomeae male gonad is
organized as a semicircle and can be reached through the subgenital ostia, they are great
folded rimming the gastric filaments (Morandini and Marques 2010). The gonad in most
Rhizostomeae is described as a cross-shaped structure in which each arm of the cross is
a band-like evagination of the gastrodermis forming several folds. The gonads are two-
layered in cross-section with a typical genital epithelium (Kikinger 1992; Schiariti et al.
2012). The male gonad is originated from the interstitial cells of the gastrodermis,
transported to the mesoglea and forming the male follicles (Miller 1983; Harrison and
Jamieson 1988). The spermatogenesis process is well known with the cellular types:
spermatogonia (pre-meiotic phase), primary spermatocytes (meiotic phase); secondary
spermatocytes, that divide into two spermatids that lost cytoplasmic volume turning into
sperm (Gaino et al. 2013).
The Cnidaria sperm consists of a head, midpiece and long flagellum. The shape
of the head is largely determined by the form of the nucleus, which may vary from
ovoid to conical or elongated. The cnidarian sperm lack the acrosome but present
several small electrondense vesicles in the apical region of head (Chapman 1974;
Harrison and Jamieson 1988). The midpiece has four or more mitochondria, could
present lipid and Golgi derivatives, the proximal and distal centrioles and the
pericentriolar apparatus anchoring the flagellum (Afzelius and Franzén 1971; Afzelius
98
1971; Hinsch and Clarck Jr. 1973; Miller 1983; Harrison and Jamieson 1988; Rouse and
Pitt 2000; Corbelli et al. 2003).
The present work describe the gonadal structure, the spermatogenesis and the
sperm ultrastructure of two Brazilian scyphozoan species: Chrysaora lactea and
Lychnohiza lucerna and one Australian scyphozoan: Cassiopea sp. Additionally, we
compare the sperm ultrastructure of the studied species with the sperm of other
scyphozoans, looking for common characteristics.
Material and Methods
Specimens of C. lactea and L lucerna were collected in four localities of São
Paulo coast (Figure 1) from March 2007 to June 2015. The collection was made by
hand at the water surface or with shrimp’s trawls. The animals was transported alive to
the laboratory and identified according to Morandini et al. (2005). Polyps of Cassiopea
sp. were collected at Weipa County, Queensland, Australia (Figure 2) and transported
alive to the Laboratory of Culture of the James Cook University in Cairns. The
individuals were kept inside the laboratory in circular aquariums until the ephyra was
released by strobilation. The mature jellyfishes were maintained in tanks with local
substrate of the collection site and were fed every day.
The animals were anesthetized by thermal shock (-20°C) for 5 minutes. The
male gonad of five individuals of C. lactea, L. lucerna and Cassiopea sp. was fixed in
4% formaldehyde buffered with a saline solution of 0.2 M sodium phosphate (pH 7.2)
for 24 hours. After fixation, the samples were buffered in sodium phosphate 0.2M (pH
7.2) for 24 hours. Later, the samples were dehydrated in ethanol series (30-95%) and
embedded in Leica® methacrylate historesin. Serial sections (3-4 μm thick) were made
on a rotative microtome. For traditional histological description the tissue samples were
99
stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) (modified from Junqueira and Junqueira
1983), avoiding baths in ethanol and xylene (Sant’Anna et al. 2010; Zara et al. 2012).
To analyze the chemical composition of the tissues, the slides were stained with
mercuric bromophenol blue and ponceau xylidine for proteins (Pearse 1960; Mello and
Vidal 1980), PAS-Hematoxylin technique to visualize neutral polysaccharides with the
groups 1-2-glycol (Junqueira and Junqueira 1983) and the toluidine blue to visualize
acid components (Modified from Audino et al. 2015).
For transmission electronic microscopy, fragments of 1mm3 of the male gonad
of C. lactea and L. lucerna were preserved in Karnovsky solution (modified from
Karnovsky, 1965) consisting of 2.5% glutaraldehyde with 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1
M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) with 2.5 mM of CaCl2 and saccharose for 24
hours; and samples of male gonad of Cassiopea sp. were fixed in Glutaraldehyde
fixative solution consisting of 2.5% glutaraldehyde 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffered
Millipore filtered seawater (pH 7.2-7.4) for 30 minutes at 4ºC. The post-fixation was in
1% osmium tetroxide with the same buffer, for one hour at the same temperature. Then,
the samples were dehydrated in ethanol series 30 to 100%, and embedded in Spurr’s®
resin. Semi-thin and ultrathin sections were obtained with a Leica® UC-7
ultramicrotome from the Electronic Microscopy Laboratory of the Department of
Genetics, Institute of Biosciences of the University of São Paulo, Brazil. Grids with
sections were contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and later examined at
80kV.
100
Results
Spermatogenesis in Chrysaora lactea
The germinal epithelium of C. lactea is organized like in two layers and between
them is the mesoglea with the sperm follicles, with cells in different phases of
development, highlighting an asynchronous spermatogenesis (Fig. 3A-C). The external
layer of germinal epithelium is composed by cells of irregular format with nucleus in
different positions of cytoplasm (Fig. 3C). The mesoglea is acidophilic being slightly
positive to hematoxylin (Fig. 3B-C). The spermatogonia are located in the periphery of
the follicles (Fig. 3C-D). The spermatocytes reduce the nuclear diameter, have strongly
acidophilic nucleus (Fig. 3C), and can present nucleus in different meiotic phases (Fig.
3D). The spermatids reduce the cytoplasmic volume; have a basophilic flagellum, an
acidophilic nucleus (Fig. 3C), positive to acid structures (Fig. 3D). The sperm have
rounded basophilic head and acidophilic flagellum located in the central portion of the
follicle (Fig. 3E-G). The sperm head is strongly positive to acid structures (Fig. 3H),
positive to proteins (Fig. 3I-J), and negative to PAS (Fig. 3K). The follicles in more
advanced stages have ovoid shape being filled almost completely by sperm (Fig. 3E).
When mature the sperm is released through rupture in the follicle wall (Fig. 3F).
Under transmission electronic microscopy the external layer of germinal
epithelium is composed of cells with electrondense nucleus and several vesicles
containing a proteic material, Golgi complex and mitochondria (Fig. 4A). In the apical
portion can be seen cilia (Fig. 4A). The follicular epithelium is composed by
spermatogonia and the sperm are found in the center of follicle (Fig. 4B-C). The
spermatogonia have an elongated nucleus with euchromatin and proeminet nucleolus
(Fig. 4D). The spermatids reduce the cytoplasmic volume and are connected to each
other by intercellular bridges (Fig. 4E). The sperm of C. lactea have an ovoid head with
101
electrondense nucleus (Fig.4F). Inside the nucleus can be noted a nuclear vesicle of
intermediate electrondensity (Fig.4F). Above the nucleus and in the midpiece are
observed little electrondenses vesicles (Fig. 4G-H). In the midpiece is observed 4
mitochondria with several crests (Fig. 4I), between them is the proximal centriole (Fig.
4J) and below the distal centriole (Fig. 4K). The pericentriolar apparatus is a complex
structure with primary, secondary and tertiary process (Fig. 4L-M). The flagellum is
anchored by the pericentriolar apparatus (Fig. 4M) and presents a simple axoneme with
the typical microtubules pattern of 9+2 (Fig. 4N-O).
Spermatogenesis in Lychnorhiza lucerna
The germinal epithelium is organized in two layers and between them is the
mesoglea with several follicles, in which, occurs the spermatogenesis (Fig. 5A). The
follicles have an ellipsoid format and inside them can be seen cells in all stages of
development, highlighting an asynchronous spermatogenesis (Fig.5B-D). Between and
inside the follicles can be seen the Sertoli cells (Fig. 5C-F). The spermatogenesis begins
in the periphery of the follicles (Fig. 5A-C). The spermatogonia are large cells with
well-developed rounded nucleus (Fig. 5C). The spermatocytes have a smaller and
basophilic nucleus (Fig. 5B-C), and is usual the presence of cells in different meiosis
phases (Fig. 5D-E). The spermiogenesis process begins with the spermatids,
characterized by rounded, homogeneous and basophilic nucleus (Fig. 5C). When stained
with toluidine blue, the nucleus presents α methacromasy (blue–greenwish) due the
DNA compaction (Fig. 5D). The sperm have rounded basophilic head and acidophilic
midpiece and flagellum (Fig. 5G-I). The rounded nucleus is positive to proteins (Fig.
5J-K), and negative to PAS-Hematoxylin (Fig. 5L). When mature, the sperm are
released by rupture of the follicle wall (Fig.5G-H, and M).
102
Under transmission electronic microscopy, the germinal epithelium is
characterized by cells of irregular shape, with elongated nucleus and evident nucleolus
(Fig. 6A). The cytoplasm has many vesicles and in the apical portion is observed cillia
(Fig. 6A-B). Adjacent to the external germinal epithelium is the follicular epithelium,
characterized by the presence of cells of bulky and electrondense nucleus: the
spermatogonia (Fig. 6C). The sperm are clustered in the center of the follicle (Fig.6C-
D), have ovoid electrondense nucleus (Fig. 6E). Above the nucleus and in the midpiece
can be seen little electrondense vesicles (Fig. 6F-G). In the midpiece can be seen the
proximal and distal centrioles (Fig. 6H). From the distal centriole is the pericentriolar
apparatus (Fig. 6I-K). Above the pericentriolar apparatus are the Golgi complex (Fig.
6L) and four mitochondria (Fig. 6M). The flagellum presents a simple axoneme with the
typical microtubules pattern 9+2 (Fig.6N-O).
Spermatogenesis in Cassiopea sp.
The male gonad in Cassiopea sp. is a differentiation of the gastrodermis
epithelium and is composed by the external layer of germinal epithelium, which lies in
the mesoglea. It is inside the mesoglea that spermatogenesis takes place, with follicles –
in a general way – composed by cells in the same development stage (Fig. 7A). Below
the mesoglea is the internal germinal epithelium, followed by a space in which the
sperm – clustered by a secretion (spermatozeugmata) – are released (Fig. 7A-B).
Adjacent to this space is the gastrodermal epithelium composed by the external and
internal layers; between them is the cellular mesoglea with several zooxantellae
associations (Fig. 7A-B). The external germinal epithelium is a simple columnar
epithelium composed of cells juxtaposed to each other, with rounded basophilic nucleus
and acidophilic cytoplasm with large vesicles. These vesicles showing no reaction to
hematoxylin and eosin (Fig. 7C). The follicular epithelium is composed by
103
spermatogonia organized in centers (Fig. 7C-E). The sperm is located in the center of
follicle and is surrounded by a secretion not stained by the hematoxylin and eosin (Fig.
7C). This secretion shows absence of reaction to acid compounds (Fig. 7D), proteins
(Fig. 7E) and neutral polysaccharides (Fig. 7F). However, the sperm present strong
reactivity to acid compounds (Fig. 7D), positive reaction to proteins (Fig. 7E) and
negative reaction to PAS (Fig. 7F). When mature, all sperm are clustered by this
secretion and the whole structure, called spermatozeugmata, is released in the space
between the germinal and gastrodermal epithelium (Fig. 7F). The secretion of the
spermatozeugmata is characterized by a secretion not reactive to any of the tested
histochemical compounds that maintain the sperm head attached and a free flagellum
(Fig. 7G-J).
Under transmission electronic microscopy the external germinal epithelium is
composed of cells with large and electrondense nucleus and several large vesicles
containing a granular material of intermediate electrondensity (Fig. 8A). The follicular
epithelium is composed by spermatogonia and in the center the sperm is immersed in a
secretion of granular material (Fig.8B-C). The sperm of Cassiopea sp. have an
elongated head with electrondense nucleus (Fig. 8D). In the midpiece is observed
mitochondria with several crests, between the distal centriole (Fig. 8E-H), proximal
centriole (Fig. 8F), little vesicles adjacent to the mitochondria (Fig. 8F-G) and lamellas
(Fig. 8G). The flagellum is anchored by the pericentriolar apparatus (Fig. 8G) and
presents a simple axoneme with the typical microtubules pattern of 9+2 (Fig. 8I-J).
Discusssion
In all studied species, the male gonad is composed of a germinal epithelium
divided in two layers with mesoglea in between them. In the mesoglea is found the
104
follicles in which occurs the spermatogenesis. In the scyphozoans Atolla wyvillei,
Periphylla periphylla, Cotylorhiza tuberculata and Nausithoe aurea the male gonad is
described as an evagination of gastrodermis surrounded by the mesoglea (Kikinger
1992; Morandini and Silveira 2001; Lucas and Reed 2010). The germinal epithelium of
all species here studied is similar to the gastrodermal epithelium. We supposed that
because the germinal epithelium is derived from interstitial cells of gastrodermis.
The follicles have ellipsoid shape in L. lucerna and C. lactea as observed in
other Scyphozoa: for L. lucerna by Schiariti et al. (2012), Nemopilema nomurai (Ikeda
et al. 2011a), Atolla wyvillei and Periphylla periphylla (Lucas and Reed 2010). In
Cassiopea sp. the follicles have circular shape as already described to Cotylorhiza
tuberculata (Kikinger 1992) and other Cassiopea species (Smith 1936; Gohar and
Eisawy 1960). The follicles have spermatogonia in the follicular periphery organized in
one or more layers. In Cassiopea sp., L. lucerna and C. lactea the more developed
follicles present spermatogonia organized in germination centers and sperm in the
center like in Na. aurea (Morandini and Silveira 2001). The Sertoli like cells were
found only in Lychnorhiza lucerna and this is the first record of this cell type for
Scyphozoa. For all species in this study, the mature follicles have irregular format with
the sperm accumulating near the internal gastrodermal epithelium. In L. lucerna and C.
lactea, like in Na. aurea and Ne. nomurai (Morandini and Silveira 2001; Ikeda et al.
2011), the sperm release occurs through rupture of the follicular wall and this seems to
be the pattern in other Cnidaria (Miller 1983; Harrison and Jamieson 1988) as the
cubozoans Tamoya haplonema, Chiropsalmus quadrumanus, Chiropsella bronzie
(Tiseo et al. 2016, chapters 1 and 2 of this dissertation) and Morbakka virulenta
(García-Rodriguez 2015). However, there are other strategies of sperm released in
cnidarians: the spermartozeugmata and spermatophore. These are observed in
105
Cassiopea species (Smith 1936; Gohar and Eisawy 1960) and Co. tuberculata (Kikinger
1992) and some cubozoan species as already presented in the previous chapters of this
dissertation. In Table 1 we compared all described strategies of sperm release in
scyphozoans and cubozoans.
In Cassiopea sp. all the sperm heads are immersed in a secretion forming the
structure called spermatozeugmata. This structure was already described for other
Cassiopea species and also for Cotylorhiza tuberculata (Kikinger 1992). A similar
structure was observed by Smith (1936) and Gohar and Eisawy (1960) for the species
Cassiopea frondosa and Cassiopea andromeda, but these authors did not call it
spermatozeugmata. The secretion found in the spermatozeugmata structure presented
negative reaction to all of histochemical staining used and if we had not observed, in the
TEM, the proteic composition of this secretion, we could argue that it could be
composed of lipids that could be lost in the dehydration. Here we also observed that the
spermatozeugmata secretion is produced by the follicular epithelium. Once all sperm are
mature, they are clustered in this secretion and then, released as a single structure.
In the TEM preparations, the spermatogonia are large cells, with well-developed
nucleus and nucleolus. The spermatocytes have rounded shape and the spermatids can
be united by intercellular bridges. This typical description of spermatogenic cells is
similar to that described for the scyphozoan Ne. nomurai (Ikeda et al. 2011) and for the
hydrozoan Distichopora sp. (Gaino et al. 2013). The cnidarian’s sperm do not have an
acrosome but, can present several electrondense small vesicles (Miller 1983; Harrison
and Jamieson 1988) as here observed in L. lucerna and C. lactea. Hinsch and Clarck Jr.
(1973) also described these electrondense vesicles in A. aurita and suggested that they
can be the precursor of the acrosome as Hinsch (1974) commented. Small vesicles were
described in the midpiece of Cassiopea sp. sperm as well as in the cubozoa Carybdea
106
marsupialis (Corbelli et al. 2003). The sperm of all species here studied have an
electrondense nucleus, with granular chromatin, but only Chrysaora lactea have the
nuclear vesicle already described to Hydra caulinata. (Moore and Dixon 1972). The
sperm of all species here studied have four mitochondria in the midpiece and the typical
flagellum pattern (with 9+2 microtubules). Only half of pieces of the anchoring
apparatus are presented and in Cassiopea sp. could be observed the primary, secondary
and tertiary process. No significant differences between the main sperm morphology of
the different species were noted. But scyphozoan pattern of the sperm morphology
could be noted. See table 2 for the details of sperm in comparison. The main
morphology of the sperm is very similar to that described for A. aurita (Hinsch and
Clarck Jr. 1973) and Nausithoe sp. (Afzelius and Franzén 1971).
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)[GRT grants
2012/19080-1 and 2014/08785-1, FJZ grants BIOTA 2010/50188-8, ACM grants
2010/50174-7, 2011/50242-5, 2013/50484-4]; CAPES [ACM 23038.004309/2014-51];
and CNPq [ACM (301039/2013-5, 486337/2013-8)]. Thanks are due to Lea Taylor,
Maxine Daves and Waldir Caldeira for all help in the transmission electronic
microscopy and to anonymous reviewers for all comments and suggestions. This is a
contribution of NP-BioMar, USP. This study was conducted in accordance with
Brazilian laws (GRT SisBio license No. 611377-9; FJZ-MMA SisBio permanent license
No. 34587-1; ACM MMA SisBio permanent license No. 15031-2).
References
Afzelius BA (1971) Fine structure of the spermatozoon of Tubularia larynx (Hydrozoa,
coelenterata). J Ultrastruct Res 37:679–689. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5320(71)80031-X
107
Afzelius BA, Franzén A (1971) The Spermatozoon of the Jellyfish Nausithoe. J Ultrastruct
Res 37:186–199.
Audino JA, Marian JEAR, Wanninger A, Lopes SGBC (2015) Development of the pallial
eye in Nodipecten nodosus (Mollusca: Bivalvia): insights into early visual performance
in scallops. Zoomorphology 134:403–415. doi: 10.1007/s00435-015-0265-8
Berrill NJ (1949) Developmental analysis of scyphomedusae. Biol Rev 24:393–409.
Bridge D, Cunningham CW, DeSalle R, Buss LW (1995) Class-level relationships in the
phylum Cnidaria: molecular and morphological evidence. Mol Biol Evol 12:679–689.
Chapman DD (1974) Cnidarian Histology. In: Muscatine L, Lenhoff HM (eds) Coelenterate
Biology: Reviews and New Perspectives. Academic PRess, New York, pp 2–92
Collins A, Schuchert P, Marques A, et al (2006) Medusozoan Phylogeny and Character
Evolution Clarified by New Large and Small Subunit rDNA Data and an Assessment of
the Utility of Phylogenetic Mixture Models. Syst Biol 55:97–115. doi:
10.1080/10635150500433615
Collins AG (2009) Recent Insights into Cnidarian Phylogeny. Smithson Contrib to Mar Sci
38:139–149.
Collins AG (2002) Phylogeny of Medosozoa and the evolution of the cnidarian life cycles. J
Evol Biol 15:418–432.
Corbelli A, Avian M, Marotta R, Ferraguti M (2003) The spermatozoon of Carybdea
marsupialis (Cubozoa, Cnidaria). Invertebr Reprod Dev 43:95–104. doi:
10.1080/07924259.2003.9652528
Daly M, Brugler MR, Cartwright P, et al (2007) The phylum Cnidaria: A review of
phylogenetic patterns and diversity 300 years after Linnaeus. Zootaxa 1668:127–182.
Fautin DG (1992) Cnidaria. In: Adiyodi KG, Adiyodi RG (eds) Reproductive Biology of
Invertebrates (Sexual Differentiation and Behaviour). pp 31–52
108
Gaino E, Scoccia F, Makapedua DM, et al (2013) Some spermatogenic steps in Distichopora
sp. (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa, Stylasteridae): ultrastructural aspects. Zoomorphology
132:121–128. doi: 10.1007/s00435-012-0182-z
García-Rodriguez J (2015) Anatomia associada ao comportamento reprodutivo de Cubozoa.
Universidade de São Paulo
Gershwin L-A, Zeidler W (2008) Two new jellyfishes (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa) from tropical
Australian waters. Zootaxa 1764:41–52.
Gohar HAF, Eisawy AM (1960) The biology of Cassiopea andromeda (from the Red sea)
(with a note on the Species Problem). Publ Mar Biol Station Ghardaqa 11:3–42.
Harrison PL, Jamieson B (1988) Cnidaria and Ctenophora. In: Adiyodi KG, Adiyod RG
(eds) Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates. Vol IX Part A, Progress in Male Gamete
Ultrastructure and Phylogeny. Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 21–95
Hinsch GW (1974) Comparative ultrastructure of cnidarian sperm. Am Zool 14:457–465.
doi: 10.1093/icb/14.2.457
Hinsch GW, Clarck Jr. WH (1973) Comaparative Fine Structure of cnidaria Spermatozoa.
Biol Reprod 8:62–73.
Hofmann DK, Hadfield MG (2002) Hermaphroditism, gonochorism, and asexual
reproduction in Cassiopea sp.—an immigrant in the islands of Hawai’i. Invertebr
Reprod Dev 41:215–221. doi: 10.1080/07924259.2002.9652754
Ikeda H, Ohtsu K, Uye S (2011a) Structural changes of gonads during artificially induced
gametogenesis and spawning in the giant jellyfish Nemopilema nomurai (Scyphozoa:
Rhizostomeae). J Mar Biol Assoc United Kingdom 91:215–227. doi:
10.1017/S0025315410001244
Ikeda H, Ohtsu K, Uye SI (2011b) Fine structure, histochemistry, and morphogenesis during
excystment of the podocysts of the giant jellyfish Nemopilema nomurai (Scyphozoa,
109
Rhizostomeae). Biol Bull 221:248–260.
Junqueira LCU, Junqueira LMMS (1983) Técnicas Básicas de Citologia e Histologia.
Editora Santos, São Paulo
Karnovsky MJ (1965) A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of hight osmolality for use in
electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 27:137–138.
Kayal E, Roure B, Philippe H, et al (2013) Cnidarian phylogenetic relationships as revealed
by mitogenomics. BMC Evol Biol 13:5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-5
Kikinger R (1992) Cotylorhiza tuberculata (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa) - Life History of a
stationary population. Mar Ecol 13:333–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0485.1992.tb00359.x
Kramp PL (1961) Synopsis of the medusae of the world. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 40:7–469.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400007347
Lucas CH, Lawes S (1998) Sexual reproduction of the scyphomedusa Aurelia aurita in
relation to temperature and variable food supply. Mar Biol 131:629–638. doi:
10.1007/s002270050355
Lucas CH, Reed AJ (2010) Gonad morphology and gametogenesis in the deep-sea jellyfish
Atolla wyvillei and Periphylla periphylla ( Scyphozoa : Coronatae ) collected from Cape
Hatteras and the Gulf of Mexico. J Mar Biol Assoc United Kingdom 90:1095–1104.
doi: 10.1017/S0025315409000824
Marques AC, Morandini AC, Migotto AE (2003) Synopsis of knowledge on Cnidaria
Medusozoa from Brazil. Biota Neotrop 3:1–18.
Mello MLS, Vidal B de C (1980) Práticas de Biologia Celular. Editora Edgar Blücher -
FUNCAMP, Campinas
Mianzan HW, Cornelius PFS (1999) Cubomedusae and Scyphomedusae. In: Boltovskoy D
(ed) South Atlantic Zooplankton Vol 1. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 513–559
Miller RL (1983) Cnidaria. In: Adiyodi KG, Adiyodi RG (eds) Reproductive Biology of
110
Invertebrates. Vol II Spermatogenesis and Sperm Function. Wiley & Sons, New York,
pp 23–69
Moore GPM, Dixon KE (1972) A light and electron microscopical study of spermatogenesis
in Hydra cauliculata. J Morphol 137:483–501. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051370407
Morandini AC (2009) Case 3485 Lychnorhiza lucerna Haeckel, 1880 (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa,
Rhizostomeae): proposed conservation of generic and specific names. Bull Zool
Nomencl 66:242–246.
Morandini AC, Ascher D, Stampar SN, Ferreira JF V. (2005) Cubozoa e Scyphozoa
(Cnidaria: Medusozoa) de águas costeiras do Brasil. Iheringia Série Zool 95:281–294.
doi: 10.1590/S0073-47212005000300008
Morandini AC, Marques AC (2010) Revision of the genus Chrysaora Péron & Lesueur,
1810 (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa). Zootaxa 2464:1–97.
Morandini AC, Silveira FL Da (2001) Sexual reproduction of Nausithoe aurea (Scyphozoa ,
Coronatae ). Gametogenesis , egg release , embryonic development , and gastrulation *.
Sci Mar 65:139–149. doi: 10.3989/scimar.2001.65n2139
Morandini AC, Stampar SN, Maronna MM, Da Silveira FL (2016) All non-indigenous
species were introduced recently? The case study of Cassiopea (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa)
in Brazilian waters. J Mar Biol Assoc United Kingdom in press:1–8. doi:
10.1017/S0025315416000400
Odorico DM, Miller DJ (1997) Internal and external relationships of the Cnidaria:
implications of primary and predicted secondary structure of the 5’−end of the 23S−like
rDNA. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 264:77–82. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0011
Pearse A (1960) Histochemistry: Theorical and Applied. J&A Churchill, London
Rouse GW, Pitt K (2000) Ultrastructure of the sperm of Catostylus mosaicus and Phyllorhiza
punctata (Scyphozoa, Cnidaria): Implications for sperm terminology and the inference
111
of reproductive mechanisms. Invertebr Reprod Dev 38:23–34.
Sant’Anna B, Turra A, Zara F (2010) Simultaneous activity of male and female gonads in
intersex hermit crabs. Aquat Biol 10:201–209. doi: 10.3354/ab00283
Schiariti A, Christiansen E, Morandini AC, et al (2012) Reproductive biology of
Lychnorhiza lucerna (Cnidaria: Scyphozoa: Rhizostomeae): Individual traits related to
sexual reproduction. Mar Biol Res 8:255–264. doi: 10.1080/17451000.2011.616897
Smith HG (1936) Contribution to the anatomy and physiology of Cassiopea frondosa.
Carnegie Inst Washington Tortugas Lab Pap 31:18–52.
Templeman MA, Kingsford MJ (2010) Trace element accumulation in Cassiopea sp.
(Scyphozoa) from urban marine environments in Australia. Mar Environ Res 69:63–72.
doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2009.08.001
Tiemann H, Jarms G (2010) Organ-like gonads, complex oocyte formation, and long-term
spawning in Periphylla periphylla (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa, Coronatae). Mar Biol
157:527–535. doi: 10.1007/s00227-009-1338-3
Widersten B (1965) Genital organs and Fertilization in some Scyphozoa. Zool Bidr Uppsala
37:45–58.
Zapata F, Goetz FE, Smith SA, et al (2015) Phylogenomic Analyses Support Traditional
Relationships within Cnidaria. PLoS One 1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139068
Zara FJ, Toyama MH, Caetano FH, López-Greco LS (2012) Spermatogenesis,
Spermatophore, and Seminal Fluid Production in the Adult Blue Crab Callinectes danae
(Portunidae). J Crustac Biol 32:249–262. doi: 10.1163/193724011X615479
112
Tables
Table 1: Reproductive strategies among members of classes Scyphozoa and Cubozoa.
Class Order Family Specie Sperm release Reference
Scyphozoa
Coronatae
Nausithoidae Nausithoe aurea Free sperm Morandini and Silveira, 2001
Periphylidae Periphylla periphylla Free sperm Lucas and Reed, 2010
Atollidae Atolla wyvillei Free sperm Lucas and Reed, 2010
Rhizostomeae
Lychnorhizidae Lychnorhiza lucerna Free sperm Schiariti et al., 2012; This study
Rhizostomatidae Rhizostoma pulmo Free sperm Paaspaleff, 1938; Widersten, 1965
Stomolophidae Nemopilema nomurai Free sperm Ikeda et al., 2011
Cassiopeidae
Cassiopea andromeda Spermatozeugmata Hoffmann and Hadfield, 2002
Cassiopea sp. Spermatozeugmata This study
Cepheidae Cotylorhiza tuberculata Spermatozeugmata Kikinger, 1999
Mastigiidae Phyllorhiza punctata Spermatozeugmata Rouse and Pitt, 2000
Catostylidae Catostylus mosaicus Spermatozeugmata Rouse and Pitt, 2000
Semaeostomeae Pelagiidae Chrysaora lactea Free sperm This study
Cubozoa Chirodropida Chiropsalmidae Chiropsalmus quadrumanus
Free sperm García-Rodríguez, 2015; Tiseo et al., 2016 -
chapter 1 and 2
113
Chiropsella bronzie Free sperm Tiseo et al., 2016 - chapter 2
Chirodropidae Chironex fleckeri Free sperm Tiseo et al., 2016 - chapter 2
Carybdeida
Tamoyidae Tamoya haplonema Free sperm
García-Rodríguez, 2015; Tiseo et al., 2016 -
chapter 1
Carybdeidae Tripedalia cystophora Spermatozeugmata Werner, 1973
Tripedaliidae Copula sivickisi Spermatophore Garm et al., 2015; García-Rodríguez, 2015
Alatinidae Alatina alata Spermatozeugmata García-Rodríguez, 2015
Carukiidae
Morbakka virulenta Free sperm Toshino et al., 2013
Carukia barnesi Free sperm Tiseo et al., 2016 - chapter 2
Classification according to Kramp (1961) and Bentlage et al. (2010).
114
Table 2: Comparison between the sperm morphology of the studied species (Lychnorhiza lucerna, Chrysaora lactea and Cassiopea sp.) and other
Scyphozoa.
Rhizostomeae Semeaostomeae Coronatae
Characteristics Lychnorhiza
lucerna 1
Rhizostoma
pulmo 2
Cassiopea sp. 1
Chrysaora
lactea 1
Chrysaora
hysoscella 2
Aurelia autita 2;3
Nausithoe sp. 4
Head length 2.01 ± 0.41 - 1.9 ± 0.15 2.17 ± 0.61 - - -
Head diameter 2.05 ± 0.61 - 1.59 ± 0.29 1.89 ± 0.57 - - -
Midpiece length 0.92 ± 0.26 - 0.75 ± 0.11 0.95 ± 0.25 - - -
Midpiece diameter 2.40 ± 0.54 - 1.35 ± 0.19 2.32 ± 0.75 - - -
Nucleus length 1.9 ± 0.35 - 1.76 ± 0.17 1.88 ± 0.59 - - -
Nucleus diameter 1.6 ± 0.49 - 1.31 ± 0.21 1.61 ± 0.43 - - -
Head morphology Ovoid a*
Elongated b?
Elongated b*
Ovoid c*
Ovoid c?
Elongated b?
Ovoid c?
Nucleus ratio 1.29 ± 0.52 - 1.4 ± 0.29 1.22 ± 0.45 - - -
Nuclear vesicle Absent a*
Not observed b?
Absent a*
Present c*
Not observed b?
Absent a?
Present c
Chromatin Granular a Granular
a? Granular
a Granular
a Granular
a? Granular
a? Granular
a?
Outer nuclear membrane Absent a*
Not observed b?
Present c*
Absent a*
Absent a?
Absent a?
Absent a?
Number of Mitochondria 4 a Not observed
b? 4
a 4
a 4
a? 4
a 4
a
Vesicles anteriorly to the
nucleus Present
a* Present
a? Not observed
b* Present
a* Not observed
b? Present
a Present
a
Vesicles diameter 0.16 ± 0.02 - - 0.12 ± 0.04 - - -
Electrondense vesicle
lateral to the nucleus Absent
a* Absent
a? Present
b* Absent
a* Absent
a? Absent
a? Absent
a?
Proximal centriole Present a Present
a? Present
a Present
a Present
a? Not observed
b? Present
a
Distal centriole Present a Present
a? Present
a Present
a Present
a? Present
a Present
a
115
Pericentriolar apparatus Present a Present
a? Present
a Present
a Present
a? Present
a Present
a
Primary process Present a*
Not observed b?
Not observed b*
Present a*
Not observed b?
Present a Present
a
Interprimary process Present a*
Not observed b?
Not observed b*
Present a*
Not observed b?
Present a Present
a
Major striated bands Present a*
Not observed b?
Not observed b*
Present a*
Not observed b?
Present a Present
a
Secondary process Present a*
Not observed b?
Not observed b*
Present a*
Not observed b?
Not observed b?
Present a
Tertiary Process Present a*
Not observed b?
Not observed b*
Present a*
Not observed b?
Not observed b?
Present a
Spurr Not observed a Not observed
a? Not observed
a Not observed
a Absent
b? Not observed
a? Absent
b?
Lamellas Not observed a Not observed
a? Not observed
a Not observed
a Not observed
a? Absent
b Absent
b?
Poli-ribosomes Present a Not observed
b? Present
a Present
a Not observed
b? Absent
c? Absent
c?
Golgi complex Present a*
Not observed b?
Present a*
Absent c*
Not observed b?
Absent c?
Absent c?
Vesicles in the midpiece Present a Not observed
b? Present
a Present
a Not observed
b? Absent
c Present
a
Structure of the flagellum 9 + 2 a 9 + 2
a? 9 + 2
a 9 + 2
a 9+2
a? 9+2
a 9+2
a
1 This study;
2 Hedwig and Schafer (1986);
3 Hinsch (1974);
4 Afzelius and Franzen (1974).
Different letters indicate variation between the species; * = difference only between the species of the present study; ? = Not described and observed in
the published figure.
116
List of Figures
Figure 1
Figure 1: Sampling sites in São Paulo coast, SE Brazil. (1) Cananéia (25°03'604''S/ 47°54'419''E); (2) Santos and São Vicente Bay (23°59'33.97"S/46°22'12.64"E); (3) São Sebastião county (23°27' 5''S/
45°1'47''E;) (4) Ubatuba county (23°31'147''S/ 045°05'193''E).
117
Figure 2
Figure 2: Sampling site in Queensland coast, Australia. (A) Queensland coast; (B) Detail of the Northwestern coast of Queensland
indicating Weipa county (12°38’57.38’’S ̸ 141°50’48.66’’E).
118
Figure 3
Figure 3: Spermatogenesis in Chrysaora lactea. (A) Hematoxylin and Eosin. General view of the male gonad. (B) Hematoxylin and Eosin. The germinal epithelium is divided in external and internal germinal epithelium. The follicles are immersed in the mesoglea.
(C) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Detail of the spermatogonia, spermatocytes and spermatids. (D) Toluidine blue. Follicle with cells in
different stages of spermatogenesis. (E) Hematoxylin and Eosin. More advanced follicle with the sperm organized in the center (arrow). (F) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Sperm released by rupture of follicular wall (arrow). (G) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Detail of
sperm. (H) Toluidine blue. Sperm head positive to acid structures. (I) Mercuric Bromophenol blue. Sperm head strongly positive to
neutral proteins. (J) Ponceau Xylidine. Sperm head positive to total proteins. (K) PAS. Sperm head negative to neutral polysaccharides. External germinal epithelium (Eg); Follicle (F); Gastroderm (Ga); Internal germinal epithelium (Ig); Mesoglea
(Me); Spermatogonia (sg), spermatocyte (sc), Spermatid (st), Sperm (sz).
119
Figure 4
Figure 4: Ultrastructure of spermatogenesis in Chrysaora lactea. (A) General view of the external germinal epithelium with cells of irregular format. In the apical portion of the cell note the cilia. (B) Detail of the follicular epithelium with spermatogonia, the sperm
clustered in the center. (C) The sperm in the center of the follicle. (D) Detail of the spermatogonia and spermatocytes. (E) Detail of
the spermatids connected by the intercellular bridges (arrow). (F) Longitudinal section of the sperm. Note the nuclear vesicle. (G) Detail of the sperm head emphasizing the small vesicles precursor of the acrosome. (H) Detail of the sperm midpiece with the small
electrondense vesicles. (I) Cross section of the midpiece with 4 mitochondria. (J) Detail of the midpiece, highlighting the proximal
centriole. (K) Detail of the midpiece, highlighting the distal centriole and the pericentriolar apparatus. (L) Cross section of the pericentriolar apparatus. Note the primary, secondary and tertiary process. In the arrowhead note the interprimary pr ocess. (M)
Longitudinal section of the pericentriolar apparatus. (N) Longitudinal section of the flagellum. (O) Cross section of the flagellum.
1= primary process; 2= secondary process; 3= tertiary process; Cillia (c) Distal centriole (d); Follicular epithelium (fe); Flagellum (f); Germinal epithelium (Ge); Golgi complex (gc); Mesoglea (Me); Mitochondria (M); Nucleus (N); Nucleolus (Nu); Nuclear
vesicle (nv); Proximal centriole (p); spermatogonia (sg); Spermatocyte (sc); spermatid (st); sperm (sz); vesicles (v).
120
Figure 5
Figure 5: Spermatogenesis in Lychinorhiza lucerna. (A). Hematoxylin and Eosin. General view of the male gonad near the
gastroderm. The germinal epithelium is divided in external and internal germinal epithelium. (B) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Detail of the follicle with spermatogonia in the periphery and sperm in the center. (C) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Detail of the spermatogonia,
spermatocytes and spermatids. (D) Toluidine blue. Spermatocytes with elongated nucleus in different stages of meiosis (arrow
head). (E) Toluidine Blue. Spermatids with rounded and homogeneous nucleus near the Sertoli cell. (F) Hematoxylin and eosin. Detail of the spermatogonias, spermatocytes and Sertoli cells. (G) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Sperm being released through the rupture
of follicle wall. (H) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Detail of the sperm being released (arrow). (I) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Sperm with
rounded basophilic head and midpiece and flagellum acidophilic. (J) Mercuric Bromophenol Blue. The sperm presents positive reaction to basic proteins. (K) Ponceau Xylidine. Sperm with positive reaction to total proteins. (L) PAS-Hemaotxylin. Sperm with
negative reaction in the anterior region of the sperm. (M) Hematoxyln and eosin. The sperm being released. External germinal
epithelium (Eg); Follicle (F), Gastroderm (Ga), Internal germinal epithelium (Ig); Mesoglea (Me), Sertoli cell (sec); Spermatogonia (sg), spermatocyte (sc), Spermatid (st), Sperm (sz).
121
Figure 6
Figure 6: Ultrastructure of spermatogenesis in Lychnorhiza lucerna. (A) General view of the external germinal epithelium with cells of irregular format and elongated nucleus in different positions of the cytoplasm. (B) In the apical portion of the cell note the
microvilli. (C) Detail of the follicular epithelium with spermatogonia. (D) The sperm in the center of the follicle. (E) Longitudinal
section of the sperm. (F) Detail of the sperm head emphasizing the small vesicles precursor of the acrosome. (G) Detail of the sperm midpiece with the little electrondense vesicles. (H) Detail of the midpiece, highlighting the proximal and distal centrioles. (I)
Oblique section of the pericentriolar apparatus. (J) Cross section of the percentriolar apparatus. Note the primary, secondary and
tertiary process. In the arrowhead note the interprimary process. (K) Oblique section of the pericentriolar apparatus and detail of the proximal centriole. (L) Golgi complex in the midpiece. (M) Cross section of the midpiece with 4 mitochondria. (N) Longitudinal
view of the flagellum. (O) Cross section of the flagellum. 1= primary process; 2= secondary process; 3= tertiary process; Cillia (c)
Distal centriole (d); Flagellum (f); Germinal epithelium (Ge); Golgi complex (gc); Mesoglea (Me); Mitochondria (M); Nucleus (N); Nucleolus (Nu); Proximal centriole (p); spermatogonia (sg); spermatid (st); sperm (sz); vesicles (v).
122
Figure 7
Figure 7: Spermatogenesis in Cassiopea sp. (A) Hematoxylin and Eosin. General view of the male gonad adjacent to the
gastroderm. The black arrow indicates the secretion with absence of reaction to the staining. (B) Hematoxylin an Eosin. Detail of the gastroderm and mesoglea with zooxantellae. (C) Hematoxylin and Eosin. Mature follicle inside the male gonad. The black arrow
indicates vesicle inside the external germinal epithelial cells, also with absence of reaction to the staining. In the white arrow note
the follicular secretion with negative reaction to the staining. (D) Toluidine blue. Mature follicle with sperm immerse in a secretion with no reaction (black arrow). The white arrow indicates the secretion in the epithelium with no reaction to the staining. (E)
Mercuric Bromophenol Blue. Secretion inside the mature follicle with negative reaction to proteins (black arrow). (F) PAS. Mature
follicle with sperm and secretion with absence of reaction to neutral polysaccharides. (G) to (J) Detail of the spermatozeugmata. (G) Hematoxylin and Eosin. (H) Toluidine Blue. (I) Mercuric Bromophenol Blue. (J) PAS. External germinal epithelium (Eg); Follicle
(F); Gastroderm (Ga); Internal germinal epithelium (Ig); Mesoglea (Me); Secretion (Se); Spermatogonia (sg); sperm (Sz);
spermatozeugmata (spgt); Zooxantellae (Zo).
123
Figure 8
Figure 8: Sperm ultrastructure of Cassiopea sp. (A) General view of the germinal epithelium with the large vesicles. (B) Mature
follicle containing several sperm immersed in the proteic secretion. (C) Detail of the previous image highlighting the conncetion
between the sperm and the secretion. (D) Longitudinal section of the sperm. (E) Detail of the midpiece with mitochondria and the distal centriole. (F) Detail of the midpiece with mitochondria, the proximal centriole and the vesicles. (G) Detail of the midpiece
highlighting the lamella, vesicle and pericentriolar apparatus (arrowhead). (H) Cross section of the midpiece with 4 mitochondria. (I) Longitudinal section of the flagellum (J) Transversal section of the flagellum. 1= primary process; 2= secondary process; 3=
tertiary process; Distal centriole (d); Follicular epithelium (Fe); Flagellum (f); Germinal epithelium (Ge); Lamella (l); Mitochondria
(M); Nucleus (N); Proximal centriole (p); Secretion (Se); sperm (sz); vesicles (v).
124
Capítulo 4
Considerações Finais
Nesta dissertação foi apresentada a estrutura gonadal, a espermatogênese e foi
descrito o espermatozoide de cinco espécies da classe Cubozoa e três espécies da classe
Scyphozoa. Estes resultados são de ampla contribuição para o entpendimento da
reprodução sexuada desses organismos.
A idéia inicial do trabalho era descrever a morfologia do espermatozoide de
forma comparativa e buscando esclarecer possiveis relações filogenéticas dos
reprentantes de ambas as classes. Como a espermiotaxonomia tem sido utilizada para
evidenciar diferenças entre os espermatozoides de espécies próximas, e para membros
de Scyphozoa e Cubozoa, quase não se tem dados da morfologia ultraestrutural dos
espermatozoides, o foco principal eram os detalhes ultraestruturais dos gametas
masculinos. Para tal, visando obter resultados ultraestruturais de qualidade, o esforço
amostral foi grande, utilizando a coleta de amostras de animais vivos e de rapida
preservação. Uma vez que o esforço amostral já era grande, foram coletadas amostras
tanto para ultraestrutura quanto para histologia e isso nos possibilitou descrever não
somente a morfologia dos espermatozoides, como também o processo de
espermatogênese a nivel histológico e ultraestrutural.
É importante ressaltar que o estudo de representantes das classes Cubozoa e
Scyphozoa apresenta dificuldades. Representantes de ambas as classes produzem grande
quantidade de muco que dificulta a separação dos tecidos alvos. A manutenção dos
animais vivos em laboratório apresenta dificuldade uma vez que, necessita-se de
aquários circulares não tão facilmente (e muitas vezes com custo inacessível)
encontrados, alimentação diária intensa dependente do tamanho do indivíduos
125
encontrados (indivíduos menores podem ser alocados em aquários menores e
demandam menos investimento na alimentação, indivíduos grandes precisam ser
alocados em aquários maiores se alimentando mais que o dobro do que os pequenos).
Dentro desta problemática, as cubomedusas são as mais difíceis de se manter em
laboratório, pois são nadadoras e predadoras ativas, não sobrevivendo muito mais do
que 48 horas em ambientes confinados.
O estudo da estrutura gonadal histológica em Cubozoa nos permitiu encontrar
padrões como a organização folicular, sendo estes circundados por um epitélio de
origem gastrodérmica e com características únicas descritas para os representantes da
classe, a saber: as vesículas não reativas a nenhum corante histoquímico testado e com
material granular ao MET. Através do estudo da espermatogênese sincronizada para das
espécies de cubozoários, também foi possível identificar um grau de maturação gonadal
cíclico que justifica o comportamento reprodutivo dos representantes desta classe e
também certa sazonalidade para se encontrar indivíduos maduros.
Do mesmo modo que encontramos padrões na organização gonadal histológica
de Cubozoa, para as três espécies de Scyphozoa, podemos dizer que a gônada masculina
também tem organização característica. Em L. lucerna, Cassiopea sp. e C. lactea a
gônada é composta por um epitélio germinal. Este, por sua vez, é dividido em camada
externa e interna, sendo interiorizado pela mesogléia. A espermatogênese não-
sincronizada de L. lucerna e C. lactea pode estar atrelada ao comportamento
reprodutivo desses organismos que apresentam fecundação externa. Do mesmo modo
que a espermatogênese sincronizada de Cassiopea sp. está associada com a produção e
possível transferência de spermatozeugmata.
Ao estudar a morfologia dos espermatozoides de quatro das cinco espécies de
Cubozoa, observamos que o número de mitocôndrias (seis) pode ser uma das
126
características do espermatozoide de Cubozoa, bem como a presença de vesículas na
região lateral ao núcleo (ver Tabela 1 para detalhes). Parece ser padrão para o
espermatozoide de Scyphozoa a presença de quatro mitocôndrias, a ausência de
vesículas na peça intermediária e também ausência do spurr no aparato pericentriolar.
Algumas das características encontradas como a ligação entre os centríolos proximal e
distal, em Tamoya haplonema, e a presença da vesícula nuclear em Chrysaora lactea,
são típicas de espermatozoides de representantes de outras classes. Estudos
ultraestruturais do espermatozoide de mais espécies de Cnidaria só acrescentariam às
analises comparativas e a delimitação de características únicas dos espermatozoides de
cada classe.
Algumas questões ainda permanecem indefinidas como a composição
histoquímica das vesículas encontradas no epitélio gastrodermal de Cubozoa e também
a composição da secreção em que os espermatozoides de Cassiopea sp. estão imersos,
formando a estrutura spermatozeugmata. Além disso, ainda são muitas as espécies que
não possuem a morfologia do espermatozoide descrita, bem como a estratégia de
liberação (se livres na coluna d’água, em spermatozeugmata ou espermatóforos), tipo de
produção (se sincronizada ou não) e o comportamento reprodutivo (fertilização interna e
externa).
127
Tabela 1: Comparação entre espermatozoides de Cubozoa e Scyphozoa espécies estudadas na presete dissertação com espermatozoide de outras
espéices já descrito na literatura.
Classe Scyphozoa Classe Cubozoa
Rhizostomeae Semeaostomeae Coronatae Carybdeida Chirodropida
Caracteristicas Lychnorhiza
lucerna 1
Rhizostoma
pulmo 2 Cassiopea sp. 1
Chrysaora
lactea 1
Chrysaora
hysoscella 2
Aurelia
autita 2;3 Nausithoe sp. 4
Tamoya
haplonema 1
Carukia
barnesi 1
Carybdea
marsupialis 5
Chiropsalmus
quadrumanus 1
Chironex
fleckeri 1
Chiropsella
bronzie 1
Comprimento da
cabeça 2,01 ± 0,41 - 1,9 ± 0,15 2,17 ± 0,61 - - - 3,7 ± 0,41 - 3.84 ± 0,34 2,98 ± 0,28 2,47 ± 0,17 2,73 ± 0,42
Diâmetro da
cabeça 2,05 ± 0,61 - 1,59 ± 0,29 1,89 ± 0,57 - - - 2,54 ± 0,24 - - 1,82 ± 0,16 1,95 ± 0,25 2,38 ± 0,38
Comprimento da
peça intermediária 0,92 ± 0,26 - 0,75 ± 0,11 0,95 ± 0,25 - - - 1,03 ± 0,23 - 1.1 0,73 ± 0,14 0,68 ± 0,14 0,78 ± 0,08
Diâmetro da peça
intermediária 2,40 ± 0,54 - 1,35 ± 0,19 2,32 ± 0,75 - - - 2,23 ± 0,20 - 2,41 ±0,36 1,87 ± 0,25 1,99 ± 0,27 2,18 ± 0,30
Comprimento do
núcleo 1,9 ± 0,35 - 1,76 ± 0,17 1,88 ± 0,59 - - - 3,4 ± 0,48 - 2,83 ± 0,27 2,75 ± 0,29 2,23 ± 0,23 2,48 ± 0,4
Diâmetro do
núcleo 1,6 ± 0,49 - 1,31 ± 0,21 1,61 ± 0,43 - - - 2,21 ± 0,19 - 1,84 ± 0,27 1,57 ± 0,14 1,59 ± 0,04 2,1 ± 0,32
Morfologia da
cabeça Ovoide a* Alongado b Alongado b* Ovoide c* Ovoide c Alongado b Ovoide c Ampuliforme a* Ovoide* Ovoide b? Forma de bala c*
Forma de
balac* Ovoide b*
Razão nuclear 1,29 ± 0,52 - 1,4 ± 0,29 1,22 ± 0,45 - - - 1,5 ± 0,21 - 1.54 1,82 ± 0,18 1,48 ± 0,21 1,19 ± 0,24
Vesicula nuclear Ausente a* Não
observado b Ausente a* Presente c*
Não
observado b Ausente a Presente c Ausente a* - Ausente a? Ausente a* Ausente a* Ausente a*
Cromatina Granular a Granular a Granular a Granular a Granular a Eletrondensa
b Granular a Granular a - Granular a? Granular a Granular a Granular a
Membrana
nuclear externa Ausente a*
Não
observado b Presente c* Ausente a* Ausente a Ausente a Ausente a Ausente a* - Ausente a? Ausente a* Ausente a* Ausente a*
Número de
mitocôndrias 4 a*
Não
observado b 4 a* 4 a* 4 a 4 a 4 a 6 b* - 6 b* 6 b* 6 b* 6 b*
Vesciulas acima
do núcleo Presente a* Presente a
Não observado b*
Presente a* Não
observado b Presente a Presente a Presente a* - Presente a Presente a* Presente a* Presente a*
Diâmetro das
vesiculas 0,16 ± 0,02 - - 0,12 ± 0,04 - - - 0,09 ± 0,03 - - 0,09 ± 0,01 0,15 ± 0,009 0,12 ± 0,023
Vesicular lateral
do núcleo Ausente a* Ausente a Presente b* Ausente a* Ausente a Ausente a Ausente a Presente a* - Presente a Presente a**
Não
observado b*
Não
observado b*
Centriolo
proximal Presente a* Presente a Presente a* Presente a* Presente a
Não
observado b Presente a Ausente a* - Ausente a Ausente a* Ausente a* Ausente a*
Centriolo distal Presente a Presente a Presente a Presente a Presente a Presente a Presente a Presente a - Presente a Presente a Presente a Presente a
Aparato
Pericentriolar Presente a Presente a Presente a Presente a Presente a Presente a Presente a Presente a - Presente a Presente a Presente a Presente a
Processo primário Presente a* Não
observado b
Não observado b*
Presente a* Não
observado b Presente a Presente a Presente a* - Presente a Presente a*
Não
observado b*
Não
observado b*
Processo
interprimario Presente a*
Não
observado b
Não observado b*
Presente a* Não
observado b Presente a Presente a Presente a - Presente a Presente a
Não
observado b*
Não
observado b*
128
Bandas estriadas
maiores Presente a*
Não
observado b
Não observado b*
Presente a* Não
observado b Presente a Presente a Ausente a* - Presente b Ausente c*
Não
observado c*
Não
observado c*
Processo
secundário Presente a*
Não
observado b
Não observado b*
Presente a* Não
observado b
Não
observado b Presente a
Não observado a*
- Presente b Não observado a* Não
observado a*
Não
observado a*
Processo terciário Presente a* Não
observado b
Não observado b*
Presente a* Não
observado b
Não
observado b Presente a
Não observado a*
- Presente b Não observado a* Não
observado a*
Não
observado a*
Spurr Não
observado a
Não
observado a
Não observado a
Não
observado a Ausente b
Não
observado a Ausente b
Não observado a
- Presente b Não observado a Não
observado a
Não
observado a
Lamelas Não
observado a*
Não
observado a
Não observado a*
Not observed a*
Não
observado a Ausente b Ausente b Ausente a* - Ausente a? Ausente a* Ausente a* Ausente a*
Poli-ribosomos Presente a* Não
observado b Presente a* Presente a*
Não
observado b Ausente c Ausente c Presente a* - Ausente b? Presente a* Presente a*
Não
observado b*
Complexo de
Golgi Presente a*
Não
observado b Presente a* Ausente c*
Não
observado b Ausente c Ausente c Ausente a* - Ausente a? Ausente a* Ausente a* Presente b*
Vesiculas na peça
intermediária Presente a
Não
observado b Presente a Presente a
Não
observado b Ausente c Presente a
Não observado a*
- Presente b Não observado a* Não
observado a* Presente b*
Estrutura do
flagelo 9 + 2 a 9 + 2 a 9 + 2 a 9 + 2 a 9+2 a 9+2 a 9+2 a 9 + 2 a - 9 + 2 a 9 + 2 a 9 + 2 a 9 + 2 a
1 Este estudo;
2 Hedwig e Schafer (1986);
3 Hinsch (1974);
4 Afzelius e Franzen (1974);
5 Corbelli et al. (2003).
Letras diferentes indicam variação entre as espécies; * = diferenças entre as espéices do presente estudo; ? = Não descrito e obsevado na figura
publicada.
129
Resumo
A filogenia dos diferentes grupos de Cnidaria permanece de certa forma pouco resolvida, uma vez
que não há um consenso de quais são as relações entre as diferentes classes e ordens que compõem
o filo. A espermiotaxonomia vem sendo utilizada como critério filogenético em diversos grupos de
Metazoa. Para Cnidaria são poucos os trabalhos descrevendo a morfologia do sistema reprodutor
masculino e do espermatozoide em nível de microscopia de luz e de microscopia eletrônica de
transmissão. Exemplares das espécies Tamoya haplonema e Chiropsalmus quadrumanus
(Cubozoa), Lychnorhiza lucerna e Chrysaora lactea (Scyphozoa), foram coletados próximos ao
Centro de Biologia Marinha da Universidade de São Paulo e junto às bases do Instituto
Oceanográfico da USP (Base de Cananéia e Base de Ubatuba) nos meses de agosto a outubro de
2014 e de abril a junho de 2015. Amostras das espécies Carukia barnesi, Chironex fleckeri e
Chiropsella bronzie (Cubozoa) e Cassiopea sp. (Scyphozoa) foram coletadas ao longo da costa leste
australiana de março a maio de 2016. Para a descrição histológica e histoquímica da gônada
masculina, amostras do tecido gonadal foram fixadas em paraformaldeído 4% preparado com água
do local da coleta e tampão fosfato de sódio 0,2M por 24 horas e as amostras foram processadas de
acordo com o protocolo para historesina. Fragmentos da gônada masculina foram fixados em
solução Karnovsky modificado (glutaraldeído 2,5% e 0,08% de paraformaldeído em tampão
cacodilato de sódio 0,1 M, pH 7,4) e solução de Glutaraldeído (2.5% glutaraldeido em tampão
cacodilato de sódio 0.1M em água do mar filtrada a vácuo, pH 7.2-7.4). Em seguida as amostras
foram processadas de acordo com protocolo de microscopia eletrônica transmissão. Na presente
dissertação é descrito de forma comparada o processo de espermatogênese dos cubozoários T.
haplonema e C. quadrumanus através da histologia e histoquímica evidenciando o ciclo gonadal de
ambos (capítulo 1). Descreve-se a espermatogênese e morfologia do espermatozoide, através da
microscopia de luz e ultraestrutura para as espécies de Cubozoa T. haplonema, C. quadrumanus,
Carukia barnesi, Chironex fleckeri e Chiropsella bronzie (Capítulo 2). Para as espécies de
Scyphozoa Lychnorhiza lucerna, Chrysaora lactea e Cassiopea sp. descreve-se o processo de
130
espermatogênese através da microscopia de luz e da microscopia eletrônica de transmissão, além do
aspecto macroscópico da gônada masculina (Capítulo 3). Adicionalmente, nas considerações finais,
é ressaltada a morfologia comparada dos espermatozoides de todas as espécies aqui estudadas
evidenciando possíveis características únicas de cada classe, enumerando eventuais caracteres
diagnósticos dos espermatozoides das espécies estudadas (Capítulo 4).
Palavras-chave: Cnidaria, medusas, reprodução, espermiotaxonomia, espermatozoide, MET.
131
Abstract
The phylogeny of the different groups of cnidarians remains elusive, since there is no consensus of
what are the relationships between the different classes and orders that comprise the phylum. The
spermiotaxonomy has been used as phylogenetic criteria in different groups of Metazoa. For
Cnidaria there are few studies describing the morphology of the male reproductive system and
sperm at the level of light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. Specimens of the
species Tamoya haplonema and Chiropsalmus quadrumanus (Cubozoa), Lychnorhiza lucerna and
Chrysaora lactea (Scyphozoa), were collected near the Marine Biology Center of the University of
São Paulo and near the bases of the Oceanographic Institute of USP (Cananéia and Ubatuba Bases)
from August to October 2014 and from April to June 2015. Samples of the species Carukia barnesi,
Chironex fleckeri and Chiropsella bronzie (Cubozoa) and Cassiopea sp. (Scyphozoa), were
collected along the Australian east coast from March to May 2016. For histological and
histochemistry description of the male gonads, samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde
prepared with water from the collection site and sodium phosphate buffer 0.2M for 24 hours. After
that, the samples were processed following the protocol for historesin. Fragments of male gonads
were fixed in modified Karnovsky solution (2.5% glutaraldehyde and 0.08% paraformaldehyde in
0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4) and glutaraldehyde (2.5% glutaraldehyde in cacodylate
buffer 0.1M sodium in seawater vacuum Millipore filtered, pH 7.2-7.4). Then the samples were
processed according to transmission electronic microscopy protocol. In this dissertation it is
described the comparative spermatogenesis of the cubozoans T. haplonema and C. quadrumanus,
under histology and histochemistry, showing the gonadal cycle (Chapter 1). We also describe the
spermatogenesis and sperm morphology, under light microscopy and ultrastructure, for the Cubozoa
species T. haplonema, C. quadrumanus, Carukia barnesi, Chironex fleckeri and Chiropsella
bronzie (Chapter 2). For the Scyphozoa species, Lychnorhiza lucerna, Chrysaora lactea and
Cassiopea sp., we describe the spermatogenesis process, under light transmission electronic
microscopy, describing the macroscopic structure of the male gonad (Chapter 3). Additionally, in
132
the final chapter, it is highlighted the comparative morphology of sperm of all species studied,
evidencing possible unique features of each class, enumerating possible sperm characters (Chapter
4).
Key-words: Cnidaria, jellyfish, reproduction, spermiotaxonomy, sperm, histology, MET.
133
Apêndice I - Protocolo de Fixador para Histologia
Paraformaldeído 4% em Tampão Fosfato de Sódio 0,2 M pH 7,2
1. Preparação de solução estoque de paraformaldeído 10%;
2. Preparação de solução estoque de Tampão Fosfato de Sódio 0,4M
3. Preparação do Fixador.
1. Preparação de solução estoque de paraformaldeído 10%
Água destilada ................................. 250 ml;
Paraformaldeído ...............................30 g.
a. Preparação:
- Aquecer a água destilada a 55ᵒC e separar em uma proveta 10 ml;
- Adicionar 240 ml em um bécker;
- Pesar 30 g de paraformaldeído;
- Adicionar o paraformaldeído no bécker com água destilada;
- Adicionar os 10 ml restantes e misturar em agitador magnético;
- Adicionar 4 pastilhas de Hidróxido de Sódio;
- Esperar até que solução fique transparente.
2. Preparação de Solução estoque de Tampão Fosfato de Sódio 0,4 M
Solução A:
Fosfato de Sódio Monobásico.................. 7,78g
Água destilada..........................................140ml
Solução B:
Fosfato de Sódio Bibásico.......................20,42g
Água destilada.........................................360ml
134
a. Preparação:
Para 500 ml de solução final:
- Misturar em um bécker Solução A e B;
- Corrigir o pH se necessário (pH 7,2 – 7,4).
3. Preparação do Fixador
Água destilada..........................................40 ml;
Tampão Fosfato de Sódio Na 0,4M..........200ml;
Paraformaldeído 10%................................160ml.
a. Preparação:
Para 400ml de solução final:
- Em um bécker adicionar 40ml de água destilada;
- Adicionar 200 ml de Tampão Fosfato de Sódio 0,4M;
- Adicionar 160 ml de Paraformaldeído 10%;
- Misturar em agitador magnético;
- Confirmar o pH (pH 7,2 – 7,4).
135
Apêndice II - Protocolo de Histologia em Historesina
1. Fixação
Colocar as pequenas amostras de tecido em solução de paraformaldeído a 4% em tampão
fosfato de sódio 0,2M por 24 horas. Sempre na proporção de 10:1 (10 partes de fixador para
1 de amostra).
2. Lavagem
Retirar o fixador e fazer 1 lavagem com o tampão fosfato de sódio por 24 horas em
geladeira.
3. Desidratação
- Retirar todo o tampão fosfato de sódio e colocar o material em séries de álcoois de 30% a
100%:
- Álcool 30%........... 30 min;
- Álcool 50%........... 30 min;
- Álcool 70%........... 30 min;
- Álcool 80%........... 30 min;
- Álcool 90%........... 30 min;
- Álcool 95%........... 30 min;
- Álcool 100%........... 1 hora.
4. Infiltração
- Retirar o álcool e colocar solução 1:1 de historesina + álcool. Deixar por 2 dias na
geladeira.
- Retirar a solução anterior e colocar em resina pura por 2 horas no vácuo.
- Trocar a resina pura por uma nova solução e deixar 48 horas na geladeira.
5. Inclusão
- Antes de começar a inclusão do material, organizar as amostras e anotar em um caderno
todas as informações necessárias para posterior identificação dos bloquinhos, como nome
da espécie, material, tipo de fixador, orientação da amostra (longitudinal ou transversal),
entre outras.
136
- Em um bécker adicionar resina líquida e o endurecedor (15ml de resina para 1ml de
endurecedor) e misturar em agitador magnético.
- Como a resina endurece em aproximadamente 30 minutos, colocar o bécker com a resina
(devidamente coberto com parafilm) em um pequeno vidro com gelo para que ela endureça
mais devagar.
- Após, com uma pipeta pasteur, adicionar um pouco de resina no molde desejado, orientar a
amostra o mais rápido possivel dentro do molde, e completar o restante do molde com
resina.
- Deixar polimerizar em estufa a 37ᵒC.
6. Fixação do bloco de resina em bloco de madeira
- Retirar os blocos de resina do molde pressionando o lado externo .
- Colar o bloco de resina no bloco de madeira utilizando cola especial* ou com cola
superbonder.
- Identificar a madeira com o nome do material.
* Araldite Profissional – Misturar partes iguais dos dois tubos até ficar uma mistura
homogênea de cor esbranquiçada, a cola seca em aproximadamente uma hora e
definitivamente em 24 horas
- Passar cola na base do bloco de resina e uma quantidade mais generosa no bloco de
madeira
- Pressionar o bloco de resina sobre o de madeira
- Cuidadosamente rearranjar a cola (com auxilio de um palito) pra que forme uma base
larga, que os lados estejam distribuídos uniformemente e que a altura da cola não alcance a
amostra.
7. Microtomia
- Limpar as lâminas com álcool e identificá-las.
- Cortar o material de modo contínuo a 10µm até chegar na amostra.
- Diminuir espessura dos cortes para 3 a 5µm.
137
- Depositar o corte na superfície da água destilada e esperar o corte esticar.
- Recolher com auxílio de um pincel posicionando na lâmina da forma desejada.
- Colocar a lâmina para secar na chapa aquecida;
- Após o término, deixar lâminas na estufa por pelo menos 15 min para secarem bem.
138
Apêndice III - Técnicas Histológicas e Histoquímicas de Colorações
Hematoxilina e Eosina (HE) (Behmer et al., 1976; Llewellyn, 2013)
1) Hematoxilina de Mayer (20min a 370C);
2) Água de torneira corrente (3min) – Lavar algumas vezes (2 ou 3) a cuba retirando o excesso
de corante e depois deixar apenas um fio de água não muito forte que elimine o resto do
excesso de corante;
3) Lavagem rápida em água destilada – Secar e analisar as lâminas sob microscópio para
verificar a intensidade da coloração;
4) Eosina (5min a 370C);
5) Lavar em água destilada (2min x 3) - Mergulhar para tirar o excesso;
6) Água destilada - analisar sob microscópio;
7) Secagem em chapa aquecedora (370C);
8) Secar em estufa (15-20 min);
9) Montagem final das lâminas com meio de montagem (Entellan ou Permount) e lamínula.
Preparação dos corantes:
Hematoxilina de Mayer (1891):
- Dissolver 1g de hematoxilina em 50ml de álcool a 95%;
- Dissolver 50g de sulfato de amônio e alumínio em 1000ml de água destilada;
- Misturar em agitador magnético;
- Deixar o corante maturar por meses (o frasco deve ser tampado com um chumaço de
algodão);
- Pode-se adicionar posteriormente 20ml de ácido acético glacial.
Eosina Y (solução aquosa com ácido acético) (Behmer et al., 1976):
- Dissolver 10g de eosina Y em 1000ml de água destilada;
- Adicionar 2ml de ácido acético glacial;
Azul de Toluidina com borax (Junqueira, 1995)
Para estruturas ácidas
1) Azul de Toluidina (1-2min) – Ajustar o tempo de acordo com a amostra aumentando
gradativamente o tempo até obter a coloração desejada;
139
2) Mergulhar a lâmina em outra cuba com água destilada (2 ou 3 vezes até o excesso de
corante ser removido);
3) Secar em chapa quente e observar a intensidade da coloração;
4) Secar em estufa (15-20 min);
5) Montagem final das lâminas com meio de montagem (Entellan ou Permount) e lamínula.
Preparação do corante:
- Azul de toluidina 0,1 g.
- Borato de sódio 1 g;
- Água destilada 100 ml.
PAS – Ácido Periódico e Reativo de Schiff (McManus, 1946)
(Bancroft & Stevens, 1982; Kiernan, 1990)
Para polissacarídeos neutros
1) Ácido periódico (10-15min);
2) Lavar em água destilada (deixar por 2min x 3);
3) Reativo de Schiff (30min);
4) Água de torneira corrente (5min);
5) Água destilada (lavagem rápida);
6) Secar e observar sob microscópio se houve reação positiva;
Opcional:
7) Hematoxilina de Mayer (10-20min a 370C);
8) Água de torneira corrente (3min);
9) Água destilada (lavagem rápida);
10) Secagem em chapa aquecedora (370C);
11) Montagem final das lâminas com meio de montagem (Entellan ou Permount) e lamínula.
Preparação do corante e reagente:
Ácido Periódico:
- Ácido periódico 1g;
- Água destilada 200ml.
Reativo de Schiff:
- Dissolver 1g de fucsina básica em 200 ml de água fervente (um pouco antes da
fervura);
- Reduzir a temperatura da solução para 50°C;
140
- Adicionar 2g de metabissulfito de potássio e misturar em agitador magnético;
- Deixar a solução chegar à temperatura ambiente;
- Adicionar 2ml de ácido clorídrico concentrado;
- Adicionar 2g de carvão ativado, com agitação.
- Armazenar o frasco à temperatura ambiente e ao abrigo da luz.
- No dia seguinte, filtrar e manter o reagente em frasco âmbar e a 4°C.
Azul de Alcian (pH 2,5) – Alcian Blue (Bancrofft & Stevens, 1982)
Para polisacarídeos ácidos
1) Azul de Alcian a 1% em ácido acético a 3% (10-30 min) (melhor 60 min para resina);
2) Água de torneira corrente (3 min);
3) Água destilada (lavagem rápida);
4) Secar e observar sob microscópio se houve reação positiva;
5) Hematoxilina de Mayer (10-20 min a 37°C);
6) Água de torneira corrente (3 min);
7) Água destilada (lavagem rápida);
8) Secagem em chapa aquecedora (370C);
9) Montagem final das lâminas com meio de montagem (Entellan ou Permount) e lamínula.
Preparação do corante:
Azul de Alcian (pH 2,5);
- Azul de Alcian - 2g;
- Ácido acético glacial a 3% (pH 2,5) - 200ml.
Azul de Bromofenol (Pearse, 1985)
Proteínas Básicas
1) Corar por 1 hora em temperatura ambiete;
2) Lavar em ácido acético 0,5% por 5 minutos;
3) Passar em Água corrente por 15 minutos;
4) Secagem em chapa aquecedora (370C);
5) Montagem final das lâminas com meio de montagem (Entellan ou Permount) e lamínula.
Preparação do corante e reagente:
141
Corante:
- Bicloreto de mercúrio 30 g;
- Azul de bromofenol 300 mg;
- Etanol (95%) 300 ml.
Ácido acético:
- 1 ml de Acido acético glacial;
- 200 ml de água destilada.
Xylidine Ponceau (Pearse, 1985)
Proteínas Totais
1) Corar por 30 minutos;
2) Passar no Tampão Acetato de Sódio por 1 minuto;
Observação: Medir o pH antes de usar o tampão (o pH 2,5 é o ideal);
3) Lavar em água destilada;
4) Secagem em chapa aquecedora (370C);
5) Montagem final das lâminas com meio de montagem (Entellan ou Permount) e lamínula.
Preparação do corante e reagente:
Xylidine
- 0,25 g de Xylidine;
- 250 ml de ácido acético a 2% (pH 2,5)
Ácido Acético 2%
- 5 ml de ácido acético glacial;
-250 ml de água destilada.
Tampão Acetato de Sódio
Solução A:
- 6,8 g de Acetato de Sódio
- 250 ml de água destilada.
Solução B:
- 15 ml de ácido acético;
142
- 250 ml de água destilada
- Adicionar solução B em A até atingir o pH desejado (2,5 a 3,5);
Observação: Fazer sempre a Solução B em maior quantidade.
143
Apêndice IV - Protocolos dos Fixadores para Microscopia Eletrônica de Transmissão
Fixador Karnovsky (utilizado para as espécies brasileiras)
OBS.: realizar todos os procedimentos em CAPELA e utilizando LUVAS e AVENTAL.
Para 200 ml de solução fixadora:
- Dissolver 4 g de paraformaldeído (pó) em 50 ml de água destilada aquecida a 60-70˚C (em
agitador magnético). Adicione algumas gotas de NaOH 1N até a solução ficar transparente.
CUIDADO, TÓXICO!
- Resfriar à temperatura ambiente e adicionar 20 ml de glutaraldeído a 25%. CUIDADO, TÓXICO!
- Adicionar 100 ml de tampão cacodilato de sódio 0.2M (4.28 g de cacodilato de sódio em 95 ml de
água destilada). CUIDADO, EXTREMAMENTE TÓXICO!
- Ajustar o pH para aprox. 7.4 com HCl 0.2N. CUIDADO, CORROSIVO!
- Adicionar 5 ml de CaCl2 0.1M (0.027g de CaCl2 em 5ml de água destilada)
- Adicionar 40 g de sacarose.
- Se necessário, adicionar água destilada para completar o volume de 200 ml (volume medido no
béquer graduado).
Obs.1: manter refrigerado. Retire somente o necessário para fixar (cobrir) suas amostras. A fixação
deve ser realizada em geladeira. Após o término do tempo de fixação, trocar a solução fixadora pela
solução tampão, descrita abaixo. Não descarte o fixador na pia (siga as normas para descarte).
Obs.2: concentrações finais do fixador: paraformaldeído a 2%, glutaraldeído a 2.5%, tampão
cacodilato de sódio (pH 7.4) a 0.1M e CaCl2 a 2.5mM.
Solução tampão cacodilato de sódio a 0.1M (para 200ml):
-Adicionar 100 ml de tampão cacodilato de sódio 0.2M (4.28 g de cacodilato de sódio em 95 ml de
água destilada). Utilize um agitador magnético. CUIDADO, EXTREMAMENTE TÓXICO!
- Ajustar o pH para aprox. 7.4 com HCl 0.2N.
- Adicionar 5 ml de CaCl2 0.1M (0.027 g de CaCl2 em 5 ml de água destilada)
144
- Adicionar 40 g de sacarose.
- Completar o volume de 200 ml com água destilada (volume medido no béquer graduado).
Obs.: manter refrigerado. Retire somente o necessário para cobrir as amostras fixadas. Após trocar a
solução fixadora pela solução tampão, mantenha as amostras em geladeira. Não descarte o tampão
na pia (siga as normas para descarte).
Fixador Glutaraldeído 2,5% em água do mar filtrada a vácuo (utilizado para as espécies
australianas)
1. Filtrar Água do mar;
2. Fazer Tampão Cacodilato de Sódio 0,1M em água do mar;
3. Fazer o fixador;
1. Filtragem da água do mar
a. Filtrar 500 ml de água do mar a vácuo em filtro Millipore de 0,45 µm;
b. Armazenar em um frasco identificado.
2. Fazer Tampão Cacodilato de Sódio 0,1M em água do mar
Água do mar filtrada.................................... 200 ml;
Cacodilato de Sódio......................................3,831 g.
a. Preparo:
- Adicionar a água do mar em um bécker;
- Em uma balança analítica pesar 3,831 g de Cacodilato de Sódio;
- Adicionar o cacodilato de sódio no bécker com água e misturar em agitador
magnético;
- Verificar e corrigir pH (7,2).
145
3. Fazer o Fixador
Tampão Cacodilato de Sódio 0,1M................100 ml
Glutaraldeído 25% (ampôla)...........................10 ml
a. Preparo:
- Separar 100 ml de Tampão Cacodilato de sódio 0,1M em um bécker;
- Adicionar os 10 ml de glutaraldeído 25%;
- Misturar em agitador magnético;
- Verificar e corrigir pH.
OBSERVAÇÃO: Todos esses procedimentos devem ser feitos em capela, com jaleco de algodão,
duas camadas de luvas de nitrilo e óculos.
146
Apêndice V- Protocolo de Microscopia Eletrônica de Transmissão
1. Fixação I
Fixador Karnovsky: glutaraldeído a 2.5% + paraformaldeido 2% em tampão
cacodilato de sódio (pH 7.4) a 0.1M e CaCl2 a 2.5mM por 24 horas a 4oC (espécies do
Brasil).
Glutaraldeído 2,5% em Tampão Cacodilato 0,1M em água do mar filtrada a vácuo
Millipore (pH 7.2-7.4) – por 30 minutos a 4oC (espécies da Austrália).
2. Lavagem I
Mesmo Tampão Cacodilato utilizado para fazer o fixador 0,1M – 3 x 10 min a 4oC.
3. Fixação II (Pós-Fixação)
Ósmio 1% em Tampão Cacodilato 0,1M - 1 hora a 4oC
Receita para 10 ml:
_ Tetróxido de Ósmio a 2% aquoso ................................ 5 ml
_ Tampão Cacodilato 0,2M ............................................. 5 ml
4. Lavagem II
Opção 1 (com “En Bloc Staining” – amostras Brasil)
_ Água do mar filtrada ............................................................ 20 ml
Opção 2 (sem “En Bloc Staining” - amostras Austrália)
Tampão Cacodilato de Sódio 0,1M em água do mar – 3 x 10 min a 4oC
Receita:
_ Tampão Cacodilato 0,1M
147
Obs: Nessa etapa, caso seja necessário, pode-se deixar o material na
geladeira por alguns dias.
5. “En Bloc Staining”
Acetato de Uranila 1% aquosa – 15 a 18 horas a 4oC
6. Desidratação (temperatura ambiente)
Álcool 50% ............... 10 min
Álcool 70% ............... 10 min
Álcool 95% ............... 15 min
Álcool 100% ............. 2 X 10 min
7. Embebição (temperatura ambiente)
Álcool 100% 2:1 Spurr .......................... 1 hora
Álcool 100% 1:1 Spurr .......................... 1 hora
Álcool 100% 1:2 Spurr .......................... 1 hora
Spurr puro .............................................. 2 x 2 horas
8. Emblocagem
Em molde de borracha ou cápsula de gelatina – 72 horas a 58oC (Amostras do Brasil);
Em molde de borracha ou cápsula de gelatina – 8 horas a 70oC (Amostras da
Austrália).
148
____________________________________________________________
Receita:
1. Spurr tipo Standard
p / + 30 ml p / + 15 ml
_ ERL 4206 ........................ 10 g ............................... 5 g
_ DER 736 ............................ 6 g ................................ 3 g
_ NSA ................................. 26 g .............................. 13 g
_ S-1 (DMAE) ................... 0,4 g ............................. 0,2 g
2. Uranila 1% aquosa
_ Acetato de uranila .................................................... 1 g
_ água bi-destilada ................................................ 100 ml (q.s.p.)