Conflicts (social psychology)

20
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY

Transcript of Conflicts (social psychology)

Page 1: Conflicts (social psychology)

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY

Page 2: Conflicts (social psychology)

WHAT IS CONFLICT?

According to Erik Erikson's theory of psychosocial development, a conflict is a turning point during which an individual struggles to attain some psychological quality. Sometimes referred to as a psychosocial crisis, this can be a time of both vulnerability and strength, as the individual works toward success or failure.

Page 3: Conflicts (social psychology)

For example:- Erikson's first stage of psychosocial development the conflict centres on trust versus mistrust.

In the earliest stages of a child's life,

they are learning whether they can trust the people around them.

Page 4: Conflicts (social psychology)

TYPES OF CONFLICT

Approach-approach conflict: occurs when you must choose between two desirable outcomes.

Avoidance-avoidance conflict: occurs when you must choose between two unattractive outcomes. 

Approach-avoidance: exists when ONE event or goal has both attractive and unattractive features. 

Multiple approach-avoidance conflicts: here you must choose between two or more things, each of which has both desirable and undesirable features. 

Page 5: Conflicts (social psychology)

LEVELS OF CONFLICT

Interpersonal conflict- occurs when two people have incompatible needs, goals, or approaches in their relationship.

Role conflict- involves very real differences in role definitions, expectations or responsibilities between individuals who are interdependent in a social system.

Page 6: Conflicts (social psychology)

Intergroup conflict- occurs between collections of people such as ethnic or racial groups, departments or levels of decision making in the same organization, and union and management.

Multi-Party conflict- occurs in societies when different interest groups and organizations have varying priorities over resource management and policy development.

International conflict- occurs between states at the global level.

Page 7: Conflicts (social psychology)

SOURCES OF CONFLICT

Social Dilemma

s

Competition

Perceived

Injustice

Misperception

Page 8: Conflicts (social psychology)

Social Dilemmas

Several of the problems that most threaten our human future arise as various parties pursue their self-interests, ironically, to

their collective detriment.

FOR EXAMPLE:

- PRISONER’S DILEMMA

Page 9: Conflicts (social psychology)

Prisoner’s Dilemma

Page 10: Conflicts (social psychology)

Competition

In Muzafer Sherif’s experiment (1996), win-lose competition had

produced intense conflict, negative images of the outgroup, and strong

ingroup cohesiveness and pride.

Page 11: Conflicts (social psychology)

Perceived Injustice“That’s unfair!” “What a rip-off!” “We deserve better!”Such comments typify conflicts bred by perceived injusticeWhat is Justice: -People perceive justice as equity- the distribution of rewards in proportion to individuals’ contributions (Walster & others, 1978).

Page 12: Conflicts (social psychology)

Misperception

True incompatibility

misperception

Many conflicts contain but a small truly incompatible goals.The bigger problem is the misperceptions of the other’s motives and goals.

Page 13: Conflicts (social psychology)

Seeds of Misperception

Self-serving bias

In-group bias

Fundamental

attribution error

Polarize

Stereotype

Preconceptions

Self-justify

Groupthink

Page 14: Conflicts (social psychology)

MIRROR-IMAGE

PERCEPTION

• Refer to the reciprocal views of one another often held by parties in conflict

• For example: each may view itself as moral and peace-loving and the other as evil and aggressive.

SHIFTING PERCEPTI

ONS

• If misperceptions accompany conflict, then they should appear and disappear as conflicts wax and wane.

• The same process that create the enemy’s image can reverse that image when the enemy becomes an ally.

Page 15: Conflicts (social psychology)

DEALING WITH CONFLICT

4 Cs

Page 16: Conflicts (social psychology)

Contact Desegregation- is the process of ending the separation of two groups usually referring to races.

Page 17: Conflicts (social psychology)

Cooperation• Having a common enemy unifies

groups of competing boys in Sherif’s camping experiments – and in many subsequent experiments (Dion, 1979)

Common External Threat

• Super ordinate Goals- goals that compel all in a group and require cooperative effort.

Superordinate Goals

• With cooperative learning in Aronson’s experiment, students learn not only the material given but other lessons as well. Cross-racial friendships also begin to blossom.

• John McConahay wrote the cooperative learning is the most effective practice for improving race relations.

Cooperative Learning

Page 18: Conflicts (social psychology)

Communication

Bargaining

• Seeking an agreement through direct negotiations between parties.

Mediation • An attempt

by a neutral third party to resolve a conflict by facilitating communications and offering suggestions.

Arbitration • Resolution

of a conflict by a neutral third party who studies both sides and imposes a settlement.

Page 19: Conflicts (social psychology)

Conciliation

GRIT (Graduated and reciprocated initiatives in

tension reduction)

The basic idea is that disputant can initiate de-escalation by making a small, unilateral (one-sided) concession to the

other side, and at the same time, communicating a desire or even an expectation that this gesture will be

matched with an equal response from the opponent. If the opponent does

respond positively, the first party can make a second concession, and a

“peace spiral” is begun.

One approach to de-escalation is GRIT, an approach developed by Charles Osgood.

Page 20: Conflicts (social psychology)