Concrete Slab Curling Over Vapor Retarders...The myth was apparently born in 1980 when ACI Committee...

2
Concrete o&A Concrete Slab Curling Over Vapor Retarders fi We have always been told that concrete slqbs t\t!.o,l,::;o,l:::;,'1"?;:;T;;;:::lT::',;T:,'::" we recently measured a slab tha.t we know had a vapor barrier only in limited areas. The portions cast oyer the vapor retarder had less curling than those cast directly on the base. What is the current industry understanding of this issue? Concrete slab curling (also termed "warping") is the upward deformation of the slab at cracks or O joints due to the development of a temperature and/or moisture gradient through the depth of the concrete after slab placement. Shortly after the placement, heat is generated in the slab interior by hydration of the cement. If the surface ofthe slab is exposed to cooler air, a temperature gradient can develop, causing the slab surface to contract relative to the slab interior and bottom and resulting in curling deformation. This generally occurs shortly after slab placement (within the first day), which supports the need to saw-cut contractionjoints so that cracking resulting from the curling stresses occurs beneath the saw-cuts and not randomly. Over the first year or two, depending on ambient conditions, dryirrg of the concrete from the exposed top surface ofthe slab also occurs, resulting in a moisture gradient and corresponding warping deformation as the slab surface shrinks relative to the slab interior and bottom. The deformations due to temperature or moisfure gradients are similar (upward at joints and cracks), although the magnitude of the total deformation varies, depending on the magnitudes of the gradients as well as the thermal expansion rate and shrinkage potential of the concrete mixture. Placing concrete directly on a vapor retarder does not substantially impact the temperature-induced deformation, but it does affect the moisture-induced distortion. However, the general beliefthroughout the industry that a vapor retarder increases the curling is untrue-a vapor retarder generally reduces the magnitude. The myth was apparently born in 1980 when ACI Committee 302, Construction of Concrete Floors, included the following statement in Section 8.4 of ACi 302.1R-801: "Impervious vapor barriers under the concrete particularly aggrayate plastic and shrinkage cracking (and slab curling); the bottom of the slab loses no moisture while the top is drying rapidly. Vapor barriers should be avoided wherever groundwater and soil conditions permit. If ground conditions require their use, a 3 in. (75 mm) layer of sand over the vapor barrier (and under the concrete) serves as a blotter to help equalize moisture content and reduce plastic and shrinkage cracking." It appears that ACI Committee 302 based this recommendation on a study published by Campbell et al.2 The tests reported in this study were conducted using concrete mixtures with very high water-cement ratios (0.7 to 0.8), and the finishing operations were performed by two journeymen that "added water to each test load to obtain the consistency (fluidity) they normally use in residential flatwork construction." Three 3 to 3-518 in. (76 to 92 mm) thick slabs were cast on a "hot and windy day," on bases comprising polyethylene sheet, a 3 in. layer of dampened sand, or a 3 in. layer of a dampened cement-treated sand mixture. The researchers noted that concrete cast directly on polyethylene sheets had "an excessive number ofplastic and shrinkage cracks" and had lower strength than concrete placed on a sand base. They did not evaluate warping. The authors' recommendations included: "If an impervious membrane is required, it is suggested that a 3 in. pervious bed such as sand be placed over the membrane to reduce cracking." The researchers also recommended that the bed be dampened prior to placing concrete. www.concreteinternationa .com Ci SEPTEMBER 2016 75 Questions in this column u..ere asked by users ofACI documents and have been answered by ACI sraffor by a member or members of ACI teclurical committees. The answers do not represeilt the official position ofan ACI commiltec. ('omments should be senl 10 re\[email protected].

Transcript of Concrete Slab Curling Over Vapor Retarders...The myth was apparently born in 1980 when ACI Committee...

  • Concrete

    o&A

    Concrete Slab CurlingOver Vapor Retarders

    fi We have always been told that concrete slqbs

    t\t!.o,l,::;o,l:::;,'1"?;:;T;;;:::lT::',;T:,'::"we recently measured a slab tha.t we know had a vapor barrieronly in limited areas. The portions cast oyer the vaporretarder had less curling than those cast directly on the base.What is the current industry understanding of this issue?

    Concrete slab curling (also termed "warping") isthe upward deformation of the slab at cracks or

    O joints due to the development of a temperatureand/or moisture gradient through the depth of the concreteafter slab placement. Shortly after the placement, heat isgenerated in the slab interior by hydration of the cement. Ifthe surface ofthe slab is exposed to cooler air, a temperaturegradient can develop, causing the slab surface to contractrelative to the slab interior and bottom and resulting in curlingdeformation. This generally occurs shortly after slabplacement (within the first day), which supports the need tosaw-cut contractionjoints so that cracking resulting from thecurling stresses occurs beneath the saw-cuts and not randomly.

    Over the first year or two, depending on ambientconditions, dryirrg of the concrete from the exposed topsurface ofthe slab also occurs, resulting in a moisture gradientand corresponding warping deformation as the slab surfaceshrinks relative to the slab interior and bottom. Thedeformations due to temperature or moisfure gradients aresimilar (upward at joints and cracks), although the magnitudeof the total deformation varies, depending on the magnitudesof the gradients as well as the thermal expansion rate andshrinkage potential of the concrete mixture.

    Placing concrete directly on a vapor retarder does notsubstantially impact the temperature-induced deformation, butit does affect the moisture-induced distortion. However, thegeneral beliefthroughout the industry that a vapor retarderincreases the curling is untrue-a vapor retarder generallyreduces the magnitude.

    The myth was apparently born in 1980 when ACICommittee 302, Construction of Concrete Floors, included thefollowing statement in Section 8.4 of ACi 302.1R-801:

    "Impervious vapor barriers under the concrete particularlyaggrayate plastic and shrinkage cracking (and slab curling);the bottom of the slab loses no moisture while the top is dryingrapidly. Vapor barriers should be avoided wherever groundwaterand soil conditions permit. If ground conditions require theiruse, a 3 in. (75 mm) layer of sand over the vapor barrier (andunder the concrete) serves as a blotter to help equalizemoisture content and reduce plastic and shrinkage cracking."

    It appears that ACI Committee 302 based thisrecommendation on a study published by Campbell et al.2The tests reported in this study were conducted using concretemixtures with very high water-cement ratios (0.7 to 0.8), andthe finishing operations were performed by two journeymenthat "added water to each test load to obtain the consistency(fluidity) they normally use in residential flatworkconstruction." Three 3 to 3-518 in. (76 to 92 mm) thick slabswere cast on a "hot and windy day," on bases comprisingpolyethylene sheet, a 3 in. layer of dampened sand, or a 3 in.layer of a dampened cement-treated sand mixture. Theresearchers noted that concrete cast directly on polyethylenesheets had "an excessive number ofplastic and shrinkagecracks" and had lower strength than concrete placed on a sandbase. They did not evaluate warping. The authors'recommendations included: "If an impervious membrane isrequired, it is suggested that a 3 in. pervious bed such as sandbe placed over the membrane to reduce cracking." Theresearchers also recommended that the bed be dampened priorto placing concrete.

    www.concreteinternationa .com Ci SEPTEMBER 2016 75

    Questions in this column u..ere asked by users ofACI documents and havebeen answered by ACI sraffor by a member or members of ACI tecluricalcommittees. The answers do not represeilt the official position ofan ACIcommiltec. ('omments should be senl 10 re\[email protected].

  • The ACI 302.1R-80 recommendation of a layer of "sand"over the vapor barrier was revised to a layer of"drainable fill"in ACI 302.1R-89, Section 8.4,3 and to a "trimmable,compactible granular fiIl (not sand)" in ACI 302. 1 R-96,Sections 4.1 .5 and I 1 . 1 1 .4 However, the guidance regardingcurling remained in the document, and it still exists in the2015 version.5 Regarding placing concrete in direct contactwith a vapor retarder, Section 5.2.3.2 ofACI 302.IR-15cautions: "There is also increased potential for a greatermeasure of slab curl."

    While a vapor retarder does prevent free water in freshconcrete from draining to the base, a vapor retarder alsoprevents moisture in the base from keeping the bottom of theslab indefinitely wet and thus allows the bottom of the slab todry. This doesn't mean, however, that slabs placed directly onvapor retarders don't cur1. A moisture gradient still developsthrough the depth ofthe slab, and because the slab bottom canremain saturated in the long-term, curling may develop soonerwhen a vapor retarder is present. But over time, the magnitudeof the curling is reduced with a vapor retarder because theretarder allows the bottom of the slab to dry and preventslarge moisture gradients from developing.

    In2004, ACI Committee 302 formed a task group, chairedby William Phelan, The Euclid Chemical Company, todocument this behavior. Steve Lloyd, Lloyd Concrete, waspart ofthe task group and collected much ofthe data used toevaluate curling with and without a vapor retarder. Accordingto Lloyd, "In our experience, curling is related to the concretemixfure paste content and is not a result of the vapor retarder."The paste content is a major factor affecting the shrinkagepotential of the concrete mixture. According to Phelan,"curling can be controlled by verifying the shrinkage potentialof the concrete mixture is less than 0.04o/o." The greater the

    76 SEPTEN/BER2O16 Ci www.concretelnternational.com

    Concrete Q&A

    shrinkage potential of the concrete mixture, the greater thedifferential shrinkage between the slab top and bottom when amoisture gradient develops and the greater the curling. As aresult, curling canvary substantially between projects even -though the moisture gradients are similar.

    In publications from Portland Cement Association(PCA1,0; the authors document moisture gradients in slabswith and without a vapor retarder. Their data show a directcorrelation between the magnitude of the moisture gradientand the magnitude of slab curling. A vapor retarder lowers themagnitude of the moisture gradient over the long term bypreventing the slab bottom from being exposed to moisturefrom below and thus allows it to dry. Although a gradient doesdevelop and curling still occurs, the magnitude is substantiallyless than the gradient observed in slabs cast without a vaporretarder where the slab bottom remains moist indefinitely.

    Placing concrete directly on a vapor retarder can prolongand increase bleeding. The f.nisher needs to be aware of thisand may need to adjust finishing timing and proceduresaccordingly. However, the use of an aggregate blotter layerbetween the concrete and vapor retarder does not provideadequate protection for moisture-sensitive flooring andproducts. Installing concrete directly on a vapor retarder andadjusting finishing operations is a short-term solution to along-term moisture problem, and it does not cause curling.

    References1. ACI Committee 302, "Guide for Concrete Floor and Slab Construction

    (ACI 302.1R-80)," American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI,1980, 46 pp.

    2. Campbell, R.H.; Harding, W.; Misenhimer, E.; Nicholson, L.P.;

    and Sisk, J., "Job ConditionsAffect Cracking and Strength ofConcrete

    In-Place," ACI Journal Proceedings,Y. T3, No. 1, Jan. 1976,pp. 10-13.

    3. ACI Committee 302, "Guide for Concrete Floor and Slab Construction

    (ACI 302.1R-89)," American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hi1ls, MI,

    1989, 45 pp.

    4. ACI Committee 302, "Guide for Concrete Floor and Slab Construction

    (ACI 302.1R-96)," American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI,2004,67 pp.

    5. ACI Committee 302, "Guide for Concrete Floor and Slab Construction

    (ACI 302.1R-15)," American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI,2015,76 pp.

    6. Kanare, H.M., "Concrete Floors and Moisture," EB119, Portiand

    Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 2005, 1 56 pp.

    7. Tarr, S.M., and Famy, J.A., "Concrete Floors on Ground," EB075,

    fourth edition, Porlland Cement Association, Skokie, lL, 2008, 25 6 pp.

    Thanks to Scott M. Tan, North S.Tarr Concrete Consulting, PC, Dover,

    NH, for providing the answer and Matt Sheehan, Concrete & Construction

    Consultants, LLC, Rolling Meadows, IL, for reviewing the answer.

    A flip-bookversion of the entire current issue ofC/ is available to ACI members by logging in atwww.concreteinternationa[.com.

    Click "view the flipbook" onthe magazine's home page.