Conclusions on Geolocation
5
Conclusions Sebastian Rahtz and Janet McKnight July 2009
Transcript of Conclusions on Geolocation
![Page 1: Conclusions on Geolocation](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071814/55a5821f1a28abc2208b4579/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Conclusions
Sebastian Rahtz and Janet McKnight
July 2009
![Page 2: Conclusions on Geolocation](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071814/55a5821f1a28abc2208b4579/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Physical mapping
Google and Microsoft and all the mapping companies aregetting better all the time, but we think physical locationcollection will be needed for a few years yet.
![Page 3: Conclusions on Geolocation](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071814/55a5821f1a28abc2208b4579/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Time and politics
The time and political dimensions of geolocation must alwaysrely on specialist local knowledge
![Page 4: Conclusions on Geolocation](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071814/55a5821f1a28abc2208b4579/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Joining up the dots
Integration with local data sources depends on knowledge ofinstitutional data identifiers
![Page 5: Conclusions on Geolocation](https://reader035.fdocuments.net/reader035/viewer/2022071814/55a5821f1a28abc2208b4579/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Thank you
• mailto:[email protected]• http://erewhon.oucs.ox.ac.uk• http://oxforderewhon.wordpress.com