Computational Methods for Multi-physics Applications with Fluid-structure Interaction ·...
Transcript of Computational Methods for Multi-physics Applications with Fluid-structure Interaction ·...
Kumnit Nong and Padmanabhan Seshaiyer
Department of Mathematical Sciences George Mason University
Eugenio Aulisa
Department of Mathematics and Statistics Texas Tech University
Sonia Garcia
Department of Mathematics United States Naval Academy
Edward Swim
Department of Mathematics Sam Houston State University
COMSOL 2010
Boston, USA
(October 8, 2010)
Computational Methods for Multi-physics Applications
with Fluid-structure Interaction
COMSOL Conference 2010 Boston Presented at the
Fluid
Flow-structure interaction (FSI)
0.
).(
),0(:
u
fpuuut
u
TFluid
f
f
Solid Fluid Solid
])([5.0~~2)~(~
~.
),0(:
2
2
T
s
s
ww
tr
bt
w
TSolid
Fluid-Structure Interaction (1D)
)(t0 1 2
Fluid Structure Fluid Structure
0 2
)1,())(,(
)1,())(,(
0)1,(1)(
)2,1(),(
)1,0(),(23
2
2
2
2
2
2
tx
dtt
x
u
tt
dttu
ttdt
xxtgx
d
t
d
xxtfx
uu
x
u
t
u
sf
ss
fff
ALE Formulation
)),(,()),(,(5.1)),(,(),(
)()(),(
),(
)),(,(),(
:))(,0( allFor
))(,0()()(
),(
2
2
txtftxtx
uwutxt
x
ut
t
v
s
ttx
sx
txtwtdt
dx
s
txtt
xxtw
sssf
s
s
ss
Coupled FSI with Control
T
sxxstts
T t
fxxxftf
T
ss
T t
ff
fddg
fuuuul
fdd
fuuM
0
0
1
0
)(
1
0
0
1
22
0
)(
1
22
)(
)5.1(
21ˆ
21
21ˆ
21
Auxiliary system of PDEs
• In the fluid domain:
• In the solid domain:
0ˆ5.1
05.1
uuullu
luuuu
xxxftf
f
xxxftf
0ˆ
0
ddgg
gdu
xxstts
s
xxsts
Fluid-velocity Profile
Displacement Profile
MAV: Membrane Wing Deflection
Computational modeling of highly flexible membrane wings for MAVs
Ferguson, L., Aulisa, E., Seshaiyer P. and Gordnier R., (AIAA 2006-1661) Computational modeling of coupled membrane-beam flexible wings for MAVs
L. Ferguson, P. Seshaiyer, R. Gordnier, P. Attar (AIAA 2007-1787) Nonlinear Models for Biologically- Inspired Elastic Membrane Wings
E. Swim and P. Seshaiyer (AIAA-2008-2008)
Experimental Challenges in MAV Design
• Small size • High surface-to-volume ratio • Constrained weight and volume limitations • Low Reynolds number regime • Low aspect ratio fixed to rotary to flapping
wings • Longer flight time • Better range-payload performance
Computational Challenges in MAV Design
Structural Dynamics
Fluid Dynamics
Guidance & Control
Propulsion & Power
FSI
Model of a flexible MAV wing
Computational Model for MAV
O
ft onan
I
fontn )2sin(025.01.0
Inflow Outflow
21
21010
100
)(
invwv
invEwEw
infwEw
yy
tfyytt
tt
1 onwn t
N
fonn
in
0
0 3
Membrane Wing Deflection
Membrane Wing Deflection