Biology 14.2 How Biologists Classify Organisms How Biologists Classify Organisms.
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin...
-
Upload
rudolph-hudson -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
0
Transcript of Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin...
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin
Protein Interaction Databases
Francesca Diella
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin
• Protein interactions determine the outcome of most cellular processes therefore, identifying and characterizing protein–protein interactions and their networks is essential for understanding the molecular mechanisms of biological processes
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin
Types of protein interactions:
A)Direct (physical) interaction via the formation of an interaction complex, more or less stable depending of the affinity of the interaction
B)Indirect (just functional) interaction via a variety of genetic dependencies, transcriptional regulation mechanisms
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin
Common Methods for Identifying Protein Interactions
Methods Type of interaction
Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H)
Tandem affinity purification (TAP)
Physical interactions (binary)
Physical interactions
Co-Immunoprecipitation Physical interactions
Affinity purification–MS Physical interactions (complex)
Phage display Physical interactions (complex)
X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy Physical interactions
Synthetic lethality Genetic Interaction (Functional association)
DNA microarray/ Gene expression Functional association
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin
Schematic Representations of some interaction detection MethodsShoemaker, 2007
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin
Experimental data(LTP, HTP)
Literature
Databases
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin
Protein Interaction Databases
• IntAct http://www.ebi.ac.uk/intact/
• BioGRID http://thebiogrid.org/
• MINT http://mint.bio.uniroma2.it/mint/• DIP http://dip.doe-mbi.ucla.edu/dip/Main.cgi
• HPRD http://www.hprd.org/
• STRING http://string-db.org/
• MIPS http://mips.helmholtz-muenchen.de/proj/ppi/
Additional links to Interaction Databases can be found at: http://ppi.fli-leibniz.de/jcb_ppi_databases.html
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin
Databases specific for certain diseases or organisms only
• NCBI’s HIV-1, Human Protein Interaction DB http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/RefSeq/HIVInteractions)
• Tair (Arabidopsis) http://www.arabidopsis.org/portals/proteome/proteinInteract.jsp
• DroID (Drosophila) http://www.droidb.org/• SPIDEr (Saccharomyces) http://cmb.bnu.edu.cn/SPIDer/index.html
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin
Intact
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin
BioGrid
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin
MINT
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin
MINT (2)
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin
Classification of PPI databases, based on the methods used to collect or generate the data
• DBs of experimental data, collected either through manual curation, computational extraction, or direct deposit by the authors, such as DIP, MINT, BioGRID and IntAct.
• DBs which store predicted PPI, such as PIPs and HomoMINT.
• Portals that provides unified access to a variety of protein interaction databases, such as STRING.
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin
Annotation policy
Curated data are generally of higher quality, but more expensive to produce
Automated/electronic(text mining)
Manual Curation
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin
• Standardization is a necessary requirement to allow exchange of data among various sources
• The Molecular Interactions workgroup is concentrating on:– improving the annotation and representation of molecular interaction data wherever it is published,
be this in journal articles, authors web-sites or public domain databases– improving the accessibility of molecular interaction data to the user community. By using a common
standard, data can be downloaded from multiple sources and easily combined using a single parser
PMID: 17687370
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin
Confidence scoring of interactions
• It is important to assess the quality of individual interactions reported in the DBs
• LTP versus HTP• Interaction scores have been introduced• User have to be critical, e.g. proteins that have
different localization patterns are unlikely to interact
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin
Score
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
cumulative evidence (x)
Score (S)
CoIP, Pull-downLow-throughput
TAPHigh-throughput
2-hybrid, peptide chipHigh-throughput
2-hybrid, X-ray crystallographyLow-throughput
Contribution of different experimental setups to cumulative evidence and score for direct interaction.
X-ray crystallography + 2-hybrid+Co-IP+GST-pull down
Andrew Chatr-aryamontri
Computational analysis of protein-protein interactions for bench biologists 2-8 September, Berlin
Score (2)• The MINT score takes into account all the experimental evidence associated with
the interaction detection method. The score is calculated as a function of the cumulative evidence (x) according to the formula:
• The IntAct MI score is based on the manual annotation of every instance of a binary interaction (A-B). First all instances of the A-B interacting pair are clustered by accession number. The score takes in account also the interaction detection method and the interaction type. Additionally the number of publications the interaction has appeared in are counted. 1 represents an interaction which have the highest confidence.
S=1−a− x
a determines the initial slope of the curve and is chosen (a=1.6) so that the function has a suitable dynamic range and only well supported interactions obtain a value close to 1. (PMID: 17135203)