Compton Scattering: final proof for the existence of photons

In 1923, Arthur H. Compton illuminated graphite (a form of carbon)with X-rays.

In 1923, methods of measuring the wavelength of X-rays were already well developed. So, since the frequency is related to as = c/, Compton knew the values of and of the incident radiation.

Compton observed that the scattered radiation has a longer wavelength than the incident radia-Ion.

On the grounds of thewave theory, it is im-possible to explain the change of wavelength!

According to the wave theory, in any conceivableScattering process the radiation frequency must Be conserved! (and thus ).

Compton scattering (2)

Compton explained the results of his observationsin terms of Einstein’s photon theory. In 1923, thephoton theory was not yet widely accepted. Manyphysicists, including most prominent, still expres-serious doubts.

So, using this theory by Compton was a courageous act!

Ten years earlier, in 1913, a group of four distinguished German physicists,(including Max Planck, the father of quantum physics!) wrote in a petition Recommending Einstein’s appointment to the Prussian Academy of Science:…That he may sometimes have missed the target in his specula-tions, as, for example, in his hypothesis of light quanta, can-not really be held too much against him, for it is not possibleto introduce fundamentally new ideas, even in the most exactsciences, without occasionally taking a risk.

In 1923 the situation was not much different.

Compton scattering (3)Compton’s reasoning: in graphite, there is an abundance of weakly coupled electrons – one can think of them as of “nearly free electrons”or, with a good approximation, as of “free electrons”.

The photon passes some part of its energy to the elec-tron, and flies awaywith less energy.

The energy has to be Conserved, so the Remaining part of the energy is thekinetic energy ofthe scattered electron.

slide)next in the that discuss will(weconserved! bemust alsoIt MOMENTUM. theNow,

'

:onconservatienergy From ENERGY ICRELATIVIST TOTAL theis which :energy final

; energy,rest only the initially, :Electron

energy;photon scattered - ' energy;photon initial - :Photon

:involved energies The

2

2

ee

e

e

EEcmE

Ecm

EE

Compton scattering (3)

Compton scattering (4)Momentum also has to be conserved. We assume that the electron is at rest before the collison, so only the photon momentum matters, and it has only a component in the x direction, while there is no momentumin the y direction (of course, it is so because we chose the direction of the impinging photon as the x axis).

After the collision, the momentum vector of the scattered photon, and the momentum vector of the electron (now in motion) are both inclined relativeto the x axis. Let’s decompose the two vectors into their x and y components,as shown in the figure (note that there are two different angles, and , don’t get them mixed!). There was no y momentum initially, so the momentum conservation requires that: sin'sin ppe

Compton scattering (5)

Compton scattering (6)The sum of the x momentum components after the collisionmust be equal to initial momentum:

ppp e coscos'

cEp

cmpcEE

EEcmE

ppppp

eee

ee

ee

/ :momentum its andenergy photon ebetween th iprelationsh theuse will weand

, :electron the to icrelativist

totalfor theequatin apply the will weaddition,In ' :ago slides hree written thave

weformulaon conservatienergy thehave wePlussin'sin and cos'cos

4222

2

So, we have two momentum equation that can be rewrittenas:

Compton (7): We will now solve the equations. It’s a pretty tedious job, but rather straightforward. First, let’s square the monemtum equations and add them:

(I simply copied the handwritten notes, pp. 91-93)

Compton’s experiments offered extremely strong support forEinstein’s photon theory. After the results became widely known,

no one could express any more doubts that photons really existed!

But you may ask: even better confirmation of the photon theory would beobtained if Compton also measured the energy and momentum of thescattered electron, and showed that they also agreed with the theory.Why didn’t he measure the the electron energies and flight directions?

Answer: suchresults wouldbe meaning-less.

In condensed Matter, fast electrons veryquickly loosetheir energydue to multi-ple collisionswith atoms.Also, their paths get dis-torted (zic-zac-like)

Compton effect – conclusions:

Compton’s experiments offered the final proof for the particle-like nature of EM radiation.

Does it mean that the wave theory of EM radiation was “killed”?

NO!!!Overall conclusion of the Chapter “Particlelike properties of light”:

Compton’s experiments did not change the fact that EM radiation manifests its wave-like nature in many other experiments:

● Young’s double-slit experiments;● Bragg diffraction from crystals;● And this is not the end of the list

SO WHAT’S GOING ON?!!!!

Well – all those experiments and facts we have reviewed pointto the DUAL NATURE of EM radiation: in some circumstanceslight manifests its wave-like nature, and in some other circum-

stances, it behaves as if it consisted of particles…

ABSURD? No! Such is the microworld!

And in the new chapter that we will start right after the present one we will see that not only light, but also “proper” particles such as electrons, protons, neutrons exhibit a similar “dual

nature”. That’s simply how the microworld is organized!

About one common misconception: namely, that the photoelectric effect is a “special case” of Compton scattering, in which the

energy of the scattered photon is simply zero:

Such thinking is absolutely incorrect!

– please read a detailed explanation why it is incorrecton pages 96 and 97 of the hand-written notes.