Compiling mortality statistics from civil registration ... › bulletin › volumes › 87 › 12...

Publication: Bulletin of the World Health Organization; Type: Policy and Practice Article DOI: 10.2471/BLT.08.061630

of 21

Chalapati Rao et al.

Compiling mortality statistics in Viet Nam

Compiling mortality statistics from civil registration systems in Viet Nam: the long road ahead

Chalapati Rao,a Brigitta Osterberger,b Tran Dam Anh,c Malcolm MacDonald,d Nguyễn Thị Kim Chúce & Peter S Hilla a School of Population Health, University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Australia. b Cancer Screening Services Unit, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia. c Osaka Pharmaceutical Company, Hà Nội, Vietnam. d Children, Youth & Families Unit, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australia. e Health Economics Department, Public Health Faculty, Hà Nội Medical University, Hà Nội, Viet Nam.

Correspondence to Chalapati Rao (e-mail: [email protected]).

(Submitted: 20 November 2008 – Revised version received: 6 April 2009 – Accepted: 7 April 2009 – Published online: 1 October 2009)

Bull World Health Organ 2009;87:XXX–XXX.

Une traduction en français de ce résumé figure à la fin de l'article. Al final del artículo se facilita una traducción al español. المقالة لەذە الكامل النص نەاية في الخالصة لەذە العربية الترجمة.

Abstract

Accurate mortality statistics, needed for population health assessment, health policy and research, are best derived from data in vital registration systems. However, mortality statistics from vital registration systems are not available for several countries including Viet Nam. We used a mixed methods case study approach to assess vital registration operations in 2006 in three provinces in Viet Nam (Hòa Bình, Thừa Thiên–Huế and Bình Dương), and provide recommendations to strengthen vital registration systems in the country. For each province we developed life tables from population and mortality data compiled by sex and age group. Demographic methods were used to estimate completeness of death registration as an indicator of vital registration performance. Qualitative methods (document review, key informant interviews and focus group discussions) were used to assess administrative, technical and societal aspects of vital registration systems. Completeness of death registration was low in all three provinces. Problems were identified with the legal framework for registration of early neonatal deaths and deaths of temporary residents or migrants. The system does not conform to international standards for reporting cause of death or for recording detailed statistics by age, sex and cause of death. Capacity-building along with an intersectoral coordination committee involving the Ministries of Justice and Health and the General Statistics Office would improve the vital registration system, especially with regard to procedures for death


of 21

registration. There appears to be strong political support for sentinel surveillance systems to generate reliable mortality statistics in Viet Nam.

Introduction

Reliable mortality statistics, the cornerstone of national health information systems,

are necessary for population health assessment, health policy and health service

planning, programme evaluation and epidemiological research. These data are

essential for monitoring progress towards the health-related United Nations

Millennium Development Goals of reducing child and maternal mortality, and

mortality from HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria.1 They are also required to assess

the impact of noncommunicable diseases, emerging infectious diseases, injuries and

natural disasters. WHO compiles mortality statistics by age, sex and cause reported by

Member States on an ongoing basis.2 However, mortality statistics have not been

published for Viet Nam,3 which had an estimated population of 88 million in 2009.4

The Global Burden of Disease study used a combination of statistical models

and local data to estimate mortality in 2001 for countries that had not yet published

data.5 In Viet Nam, total mortality was estimated from model life tables with under-

five mortality measures derived from birth history surveys as model inputs. Cause-of-

death patterns in Viet Nam were assumed to approximate a combination of estimated

patterns for Chinese, Indian and Thai populations.5 The resultant Vietnamese

mortality and cause-of-death estimates were anchored only weakly in local data.

Mortality patterns were also derived around the same period (1999–2001) for a

demographic surveillance site covering about 50 000 people in northern Viet Nam,6,7

but these data were limited in their generalizability due to small sample size and

narrow geographic coverage.


of 21

Civil registration and vital statistics systems (vital registration systems) are

considered the optimal source of mortality statistics because data on deaths recorded

under legal provisions are likely to be complete.8 In Viet Nam, although civil

registration was mandated under the first Vietnamese national civil code in 1956,9 no

vital statistics from civil registration sources have been published to date. Hence a

critical assessment of the operational characteristics of vital registration systems in

Viet Nam was needed to identify limitations in the system’s ability to produce

accurate local mortality statistics.

Vital registration systems operate through a complex network of agencies at

different levels in the national administrative structure. These systems comprise two

distinct but related operations: i) registering vital events and issuing certificates of

civil status and ii) compiling statistical information from vital records (Fig. 1).

Assessments of vital registration systems should be based on a comprehensive

framework10 that covers key aspects of their operations. The assessment framework

we used explores administrative, technical and societal issues that influence civil

registration systems.

First, administrative aspects were assessed through: i) comprehensive review

of the legal framework, including definitions of vital events and delegation of duties

and responsibilities for reporting and registration; ii) mapping of different elements in

the structure and organization of registration and statistical processes; and iii) scrutiny

of the system design, in terms of the format and content of key documents used to

record vital events, or to compile statistics.

Second, from a technical perspective, data management and quality assurance

procedures together with the availability of skilled human resources were studied

because of their critical influence on vital registration systems. Key technical aspects


of 21

included compliance with international data standards, capacity to provide the cause

of death, efficiency in the processing and management of vital records and statistical

data, and periodic data evaluation with demographic and epidemiological methods.

Third, influences on vital registration systems have a societal perspective that

involves the political will to support the system as well as public awareness and

participation in the registration process. These critical aspects were considered

because of the primordial role of government in implementing registration,

encouraging civil participation in the reporting of vital events and using vital statistics

for health development.

Here we present the findings of a case study of civil registration and vital

statistics systems in three provinces in Viet Nam. The assessment framework

described above was used to critically examine the current availability and adequacy

of the data that the system records. We also identified collaborative strategies that

would allow key institutions in Viet Nam to develop interim and sustainable long-

term solutions to improve data availability.

Methods

The study was conducted by researchers from the School of Population Health,

University of Queensland (Brisbane, Australia) and Hà Nội Medical University (Viet

Nam). The Ministry of Justice of Viet Nam assisted in data collection and

compilation. Fieldwork was conducted in three provinces selected to represent the

three broad geographic areas of Viet Nam: i) Hòa Bình, a province of the

mountainous area in northern Viet Nam comprising the capital Hòa Bình and 10 rural

districts divided into 214 communes; ii) Thừa Thiên–Huế, a province in central Viet

Nam comprising the capital Huế and eight rural districts divided into 150 communes;


of 21

iii) Bình Dương, a province in the Mekong Delta area in the south, comprising the

capital Thu Dau Mot and six rural districts divided into 79 communes. This province

hosts large industries that employ migrants from other provinces.

Qualitative methods

We reviewed all available publications on vital registration. Two communes in each

province were visited to review registration documents and procedures. As key

informants we interviewed the head of Civil Registration and Subdivision

Administration from the Ministry of Justice in Hà Nội and the provincial managers of

the Register and Judicial Support Departments from each province studied. Focus

group discussions involved Justice Department staff responsible for running the

system at the district and commune levels. We focused on human interpretations and

the social context of vital registration procedures. Interview and discussion transcripts

were translated from Vietnamese to English, and translations were checked for quality

and consistency by bilingual research team members and by an external reviewer. The

qualitative data were coded to emergent themes related to the assessment framework

and analysed for variations in practices at the province, district and commune levels.

Quantitative methods

We compiled detailed statistics on population and deaths by sex and five-year age

groups from population and vital event registers in each commune in the three study

provinces for the year 2006. Annual population and cumulative death tallies were

calculated for communes and analysed to produce abridged life tables by sex for each

province for 2006.11 (Life tables are demographic models that summarize current age-

specific mortality patterns in a population to calculate life expectancy at specific

ages). Observed age-specific death rates from each province were assessed for


of 21

completeness of adult death registration with the Brass growth balance indirect

demographic method.12 This technique assesses completeness of death registration at

ages older than five years by comparing the age distribution of reported deaths with

the expected age distribution of deaths based on the observed population age

structure, assuming the population is closed to migration.

Results

Administrative aspects

Legal framework

Our assessment showed that the current framework sets out duties and responsibilities

at different echelons in the judicial hierarchy, and provides instructions on record-

keeping, issuing certificates, submitting statistical data and supervisory roles (Table 1

available at: http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/87/##/##-######/en/index.html).

One problem is the ambiguity in the requirements for registering deaths that occur

within 24 hours of birth. The Civil Code states, “If a newborn child dies after birth,

then both birth and death must be declared”.13 In contrast, guidelines issued by the

Ministry of Justice say that deaths occurring within 24 hours of birth need not be

registered.14 From another perspective, both the Code and the guidelines stipulate that

fetal deaths need not be reported, which limits assessments of perinatal mortality.

A further problem was that the instructions regarding registration of deaths of

temporary residents or migrants were unclear. In most instances a death notice must

be submitted at the place of usual residence for death registration, although this is

usually not done. Furthermore, there were no clear instructions on how to report,

record or compile data on causes of death according to current international standards

prescribed by the United Nations.8


of 21

System structure

Fig. 2 depicts the structure of the current Vietnamese system – an example of

“centralised administration with a single agency for civil registration and vital

statistics”.15 This administrative structure has advantages for nationwide consistency

in operation, and facilitates rapid, countrywide implementation of new policies.

However, at the design stage the centralized structure should engage other

governmental agencies or programmes that need registration and statistical

information, i.e. the health sector, research organizations and other social services.15

We found that national statistics agencies were not involved in data

compilation or data management activities. Furthermore, although the health sector is

required to furnish a death notice to the family in case of an institutional death, there

is no direct reporting link between the health sector and the Ministry of Justice.

Instead, the health sector operates a parallel system for recording births and deaths

that relies on inputs from commune health staff, rather than any formal notification

process by the public. These issues should be taken into account when planning

reforms to vital registration systems in Viet Nam.

System design

The Ministry of Justice prescribes 16 specific forms and registers pertaining to civil

status and residence, including births, deaths and marriages.16 For death registration,

the required documents are: i) an original document, i.e. a death notice from hospitals

or documentation for community deaths from the employer or community witnesses

(Fig. 2); ii) the registration records, i.e. two copies of the death register maintained at

the commune level, and the death certificate (a complete transcript of the death

register) issued to relatives of the deceased; iii) the statistical report, i.e. a monthly

return that compiles summary vital statistics including deaths in three age groups (0–


of 21

1, 1–16 and > 16 years) and causes according to four categories (disease or old age,

accidents, suicide and others).

The absence of detailed information on deaths by age, sex and cause in the

monthly statistical summary report limit its usefulness for detailed demographic or

epidemiological analyses.

Technical perspective

Compliance with standards

We found that the death notice from hospitals has only one line for reporting the cause

of death, which does not comply with international recommendations to record

immediate, antecedent, underlying and contributory causes.17 Also, there is no

standard format for notifying deaths that occur in the community. The death register

includes one column for recording the cause of death as mentioned in the original

document.

Data inputs

Each commune maintains two copies of the death register; one copy is submitted

annually to the district office. Communes also submit monthly statistical returns. Each

district office cross-checks statistical returns against death registers and compiles

annual summary vital statistics, which are submitted to the province and central

offices. Mortality statistics for 2007 were compiled by the Ministry of Justice for each

province in Viet Nam – the first national compilation of vital statistics ever (Dr Tran

That, Ministry of Justice, Viet Nam, personal communication, July 2008). We found

that the process for submitting statistical reports, verifying data and compiling

summary vital statistics is functional, although the final data do not comply with

prescribed data standards for population-wide mortality analyses with regard to age-

specificity or detailed causes of death.18

Efficiency and human resources

In communes, vital registration and statistical data are compiled by justice clerks, who

are certified in law or trained in vital registration by the Ministry of Justice. Clerks

also make household visits to register deaths reported to them by other sources, e.g.

population counsellors, health staff and police.


of 21

Focus group discussions with justice clerks revealed that training programmes

are largely theoretical, with little supervision or on-site support to resolve practical

issues. Irregularities result, particularly in the registration of infant and migrant

deaths. Registration may be incomplete because details regarding identity or address

are missing for deaths reported by other sources, or because time to make household

visits is insufficient. Some justice clerks felt that their registration records were

complete and up to date, based on their perceptions of proximity with the community

and voluntary compliance with vital registration. This, however, was not borne out by

reported statistics. In one commune with a population of over 10 000, only 7 deaths

were registered during a 2-year period, yielding an implausibly low annual death rate

of 0.35 per 1000.

The current vital registration system lacks sufficient human resources to

record detailed causes of death. To improve the efficiency and completeness of death

registration, reforms should aim to increase human resources, i.e. health staff trained

in conducting verbal autopsy interviews, physicians trained in cause-of-death

certification, and statisticians trained in data coding, processing and tabulation.

Data evaluation

To evaluate data quality we used demographic analyses of detailed age- and sex-

specific population and mortality data compiled from each commune (Table 2). The

estimated low completeness of death registration at ages older than five years (32%–

51%) and low levels of under-five mortality compared with similar measures from

survey-based data19 resulted in observed life expectancies at birth that were higher

than modelled estimates.20 The observed crude death rates were also lower than rates

from the 1999 census.21 Incomplete registration was also observed in a study that used

direct matching methods in the demographic surveillance site in Bavi district.22 Taken

together, these observations suggest that deaths are significantly under-registered.

Societal perspective

Political will and support

Because governments are responsible for vital registration systems, they must provide

adequate political will and support. While recognizing that we had no empirical basis

for assessing political support for vital registration activities, we nonetheless

identified several issues that reflect the current environment in Viet Nam. First, the


of 21

most recent version of the relevant Ministry of Justice decree of 2005 sets down the

organization of the vital registration system more clearly. Second, the Ministry of

Justice guidelines for implementation14 simplify the law for justice clerks and the

public, and reflect the responsive nature of the bureaucracy. Third, the 2005 reforms

for immediate implementation in 2006, supported by training programmes for justice

clerks at the province, district and commune levels, also indicates a strong level of

political support. In 2007, another positive step was the compilation of mortality

statistics from registration data by the Ministry of Justice. This impetus for

strengthening vital registration should continue through political support for reforms

to improve intersectoral collaboration.

Public awareness and participation

We did not use direct community interaction to gather evidence on public awareness

of responsibilities towards and perceived benefits from death registration. However,

our discussions with registration personnel provided insight on possible barriers to

public participation (Box 1), and corroborated results from similar qualitative research

in Bavi district.23 The limited incentives for death registration were reflected by one

citizen (as narrated by a justice clerk), who remarked, “I do not know what to do with

the death certificate which only repeats my sad memories of the event. Further, I

cannot go to work for the day, hence lose a day’s salary”. As a justice clerk noted in

his description of a household visit to conduct the formalities of registration, “…death

is a very sensitive [issue] and it is impossible for us to go and ask a family to register

the death while they are grieving. We will be shouted at…”. Recording the cause of

death may be a further obstacle, as described by another justice clerk who reported,

“When we ask for the cause of death, they say, ‘my father’s death is my personal

issue’”. The government should take these perceptions into account in efforts to

develop culturally sensitive, streamlined procedures for death registration.

Creating community demand for death certificates for legal and social

purposes would increase public support, and community sensitization has improved

public participation. One justice clerk stated that his commune benefited from

registration awareness campaigns. Public addresses during on-site registration camps

have been successful, as has the incentive of 50 kg of rice for registering deaths

within the 15-day deadline in several communes located in Hòa Bình (Malcolm

MacDonald, personal communication, July 2008).


of 21

Discussion

In 2002, the Vietnamese Ministry of Health included several mortality indicators in its

prescribed lists of essential health indicators at district, provincial and national levels:

perinatal, infant and under-five mortality rates, maternal mortality ratios, leading

causes of death, mortality rates from common infectious diseases and life expectancy

at birth.24 A recent assessment of health information systems in Viet Nam identified

two main sources of mortality statistics: the Ministry of Justice Vital Registration

System and the Primary Vital Record System (health sector).25 The review identified

problems with data from both sources. The Ministry of Justice system was inadequate

at ascertaining causes of death, while the Primary Vital Record System was

constrained by insufficient village health staff or their periodic rotation. This review

mentioned two other potential data sources: the permanent residence registration

system operated by the public security sector; and the population surveillance system

operated by the General Office for Population and Family Planning (Ministry of

Health). However, the former is dependent on the Ministry of Justice system for

inputs on vital events, whereas the latter system focuses on data related to birth and

family planning.

National vital registration systems are the ideal source for mortality statistics.

The Ministry of Health plays a crucial role in improving vital registration, and should

ensure that health staff are committed to the accurate reporting of births and deaths

and ascertaining cause of death.26 The General Statistics Office could facilitate data

compilation and management. A collaborative programme is needed to strengthen

registration and statistical operations, preferably through an interagency coordination

committee. The committee should develop a charter of responsibilities and actions

based on the roles and needs of different stakeholders, particularly the Ministries of

Justice and Health. Adequate intersectoral collaboration at the local level is essential

to improve completeness of registration.

Previous efforts to assess civil registration and vital statistics systems were

conducted through detailed questionnaires completed by national government

officials,27 or through visits that focused on reviewing systemic aspects of vital

registration.28 Our research method combined systems assessment with data

evaluation and analyses to characterize the performance of the system with actual

data. Our quantitative analyses found low completeness of adult death registration in


of 21

all three provinces and lower-than-expected under-five mortality measures as features

that provide a rough baseline assessment of system performance. We used qualitative

methods to identify the reasons for under-registration of deaths. Fieldwork also

determined that vital registration operations were consistent in all three provinces,

indicating the potential for reforms to be simultaneously implemented across the

country. Our findings, together with the recommendations listed in Table 3, exemplify

how our assessment framework could be applied to develop practical solutions for

improving vital registration in Viet Nam. In summary, vital events should be clearly

defined within the legal framework, and the structure and organization of the system

should ensure complete registration. In addition, the system should be appropriately

designed to record events correctly, and statistical outputs should be timely and

accurately reflect the actual data.

The first steps

Vital registration in Viet Nam could be improved by establishing a sentinel mortality

surveillance system.29,30 This has also been recommended by the Ministry of Health as

an interim measure for vital statistics.24 Towards this end a field research project is

currently under way in a nationally representative sample of almost 200 communes,

covering 2.6 million people. In each commune a justice clerk, health staff members

and community representatives will collect data on deaths by age, sex and cause in

2009. Five medical universities are leading the implementation of locally adapted

verbal autopsy methods, guided by community perceptions of death reporting and

cause-of-death enquiry. These are the first steps towards strengthening vital

registration in Viet Nam.

The demand for data from the health sector, donor agencies and the

international community could stimulate interest and funding to continue improving

the mortality statistics system. Utilization of mortality data by health planners,

academics and researchers would accelerate this process. Adequate leadership

combined with a strategic approach could help realize the goal of timely and reliable

mortality statistics for Viet Nam in the foreseeable future.

Ethics approval


of 21

Ethics approval for the research was obtained from the Hà Nội Medical University

Review Board in Bio-Medical Research and the Behavioural and Social Sciences

Ethical Review Committee at the University of Queensland.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dinh Thi Thanh Huyen for facilitating focus group discussions and key

informant interviews and for translating specific documents from Vietnamese to

English. We also thank Pham Nguyen Bang for transcription and decoding of

recorded interviews in Vietnamese.

Funding

This study was undertaken with funding from WHO (Contract ID: OD/TS-07–00322) and the Atlantic Philanthropies (Grant No #14614).

Competing interests:

None declared.

References

1. UN Millennium Project. Investing in development: a practical plan to achieve the millennium development goals. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme; 2005. Available from: http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/reports/fullreport.htm [accessed on 28 September 2009].

2. WHO nomenclature regulations. In: International statistical classification of diseases and health related problems,10th revision, volume 1. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1993: 1241-43.

3. Mahapatra P, Shibuya K, Lopez AD, Coullare F, Notzon FC, Rao C, et al. Civil registration systems and vital statistics: successes and missed opportunities. Lancet 2007;370:1653-63. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61308-7

4. World population prospects: the 2008 revision – highlights (Working paper no. ESA/P/WP.210). New York, NY: United Nations; 2009.

5. Mathers CD, Lopez AD, Murray CJL. The burden of disease and mortality by condition: Data, methods, and results for 2001. In: Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJL, editors. Global burden of disease and risk factors. Washington, D.C./New York: The World Bank/Oxford University Press; 2006.

6. Byass P. Patterns of mortality in Bavi, Vietnam, 1999-2001. Scand J Public Health Suppl 2003;62:8-11. PMID:14578074 doi:10.1080/14034950310015040


of 21

7. Huong DL, Minh HV, Byass P. Applying verbal autopsy to determine cause of death in rural Vietnam. Scand J Public Health Suppl 2003;31:19-25. PMID:14649633 doi:10.1080/14034950310015068

8. Principles and recommendations for a vital statistics system, revision 2. New York, NY: United Nations Statistical Commission; 1999.

9. Pham TC. [About civil administration]. In Vietnamese. Hà Nội: Politics Publishing House; 2004.

10. Rao C, Bradshaw D, Mathers CD. Improving death registration and statistics in developing countries: lessons from subSaharan Africa. Southern African Journal of Demography 2004;9(2):81-91.

11. Rowland D. Demographic methods and concepts. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.

12. Brass growth balance method. In: Manual X: Indirect techniques for demographic estimation. New York: United Nations; 1983:139-146 (ST/ESA/SER.A/81).

13. Government of Viet Nam. Introduction to the civil code of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, 2005. Hà Nội: The Labour-Social Publishing House; 2005.

14. Ministry of Justice. [Professional guidelines for civil registration and administration]. In Vietnamese. Hà Nội: Justice Publishing House; 2006.

15. Administrative infrastructures: centralized, decentralized and local civil registration systems, and the interface with vital statistics systems. In: Handbook on civil registration and vital statistics systems: management, operation and maintenance. New York: United Nations; 1998: 4-15.

16. Ministry of Justice. [New regulations for civil registration and administration]. In Vietnamese. Hà Nội: Politics Publishing House; 2006.

17. Mortality: guidelines for certification and rules for coding. In: International statistical classification of diseases and health related problems, 10th revision, volume 2: instruction manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1993:30-65.

18. Statistical presentation. In: International statistical classification of diseases and health related problems, 10th revision, volume 2: instruction manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1993:124-38.

19. Demographic and Health Surveys. Vietnam 2002. Calverton, MD: ICF Macro; 2002. Available from: http://www.measuredhs.com/countries/country_main.cfm?ctry_id=56 [accessed on 28 September 2009].

20. WHO Statistical Information System. Vietnam: mortality and burden of disease. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. Available from: http://www.who.int/whosis/en/ [accessed on 28 September 2009].


of 21

21. Population and housing census Vietnam 1999. Hà Nội: General Statistics Office; 1999. Available from: http://www.gso.gov.vn/default.aspx?tabid=503&ItemID=1841 [accessed on 28 September 2009].

22. Huy TQ, Long NH, Hoa DP, Byass P, Ericksson B. Validity and completeness of death reporting and registration in a rural district of Vietnam. Scand J Public Health Suppl 2003;31:12-8. PMID:14640146 doi:10.1080/14034950310015059

23. Huy TQ, Johannson A, Long NH. Reasons for not reporting deaths: a qualitative study in rural Vietnam. World Health Popul 2007; 9(1):14-23 PMID:18270497

24. List of essential health indicators issued under decision no. 2553/2002 QD-BYT. Hà Nội: Ministry of Health; 2002. Available from: http://soyte.angiang.gov.vn/xemtin.asp?cap=1&id=60] [accessed on 28 September 2009].

25. Vietnam health information system review and assessment: report submitted to Health Metrics Network, World Health Organization. Hà Nội: Ministry of Health; 2006.

26. Handbook on civil registration and vital statistics systems: Information, education and communication. New York, NY: United Nations; 1998.

27. Handbook on vital statistics systems and methods, volume 2: review of national practices (Report no. ST/ESA/STAT/SER.F/35). New York, NY: United Nations; 1985.

28. Benjamin B. Vital registration systems in five developing countries: Honduras, Mexico, Philippines, Thailand, and Jamaica: a comparative study (Report no. DHHS Publication no. (PHS) 81-1353). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1980.

29 Setel PW, Sankoh O, Rao C, Velkoff VA, Mathers C, Gonghuan Y, et al. Sample registration of vital events with verbal autopsy: a renewed commitment to measuring and monitoring vital statistics. Bull World Health Organ 2005;83:611-7. PMID:16184280 PMID:16184280

30. Begg S, Rao C, Lopez AD. Design options for sample-based mortality surveillance. Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:1080-7. PMID:15911547 PMID:15911547 doi:10.1093/ije/dyi101


of 21

Table 1. Evolution of legal framework for vital registration in Viet Nam Characteristic of legal framework

Historical evolution and current status

Duties and responsibilities for registration and vital statistics

• 1956–1998: death registration operated by Ministry of Domestic Affairs; 1998 onwards operated by Ministry of Justice.

• 1956–1998: Registration and issue of certificates free of charge. 1998 onwards, fees for registration and issuance of certificates.

• 2005 decree provides clear instructions on maintenance of vital records, issuance of certificates, processing corrections, submission of statistical returns; and registration services for Vietnamese citizens living abroad, in liaison with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Coverage • Vietnamese decrees all mandate complete coverage.

Reporting responsibilities and penalties

• 1956–1998: Duty of relatives/persons of authority to notify death at place of occurrence; late registration punishable by law.

• 1998–2005: Notification document not required for death at place of usual residence. Late registration subject to financial penalties.

• 2005:death notice mandatory from health authority or responsible person for all deaths; no penalties for delayed registration.

Reporting period

• 1956–1961: death reported to local police within 24 hours to get burial permit, which is submitted within 7 days for death registration.

• 1961–1998: Death registration to be completed within 24 hours. • 1998–2005: Death registration to be completed within 48 hours in urban areas; within 15 days in remote

and rural areas. • 2005 onwards: Death registration is required within 15 days of death.

Definitions for early age mortality

• No definitions of fetal death in terms of duration of gestation/birth weight in any version of Vietnamese decrees.

• 1956 onwards: (according to civil code) Fetal deaths require only burial permission, not registration. Neonatal deaths require both birth and death registration.

• 2005 onwards: (according to Ministry of Justice guidelines): Deaths within 24 hours of birth do not require birth / death registration.

• 2005 onwards: Infant deaths not reported by parents can be registered by the justice clerks. Requirements for reporting cause of

• 1956–1961: No mention of requirement to report cause of death. • 1961–1998: Declarant should mention cause of death in death notice.


of 21

death • 1998: “doubtful death”a require cause of death issued by police. Death notice from health facilities must include cause of death.

• In 2005 decree, cause of death must be mentioned for all deaths. However, there is no stipulation regarding medical opinion as to the cause, nor specific format for reporting cause of death.

Compilation and submission of vital statistics

• 1998: Compilation and submission of vital statistics first stipulated in the decree, including an annual report to Government.

• 2005: Submission of statistical reports from commune upwards every 6 months. Ministry of Justice responsible for summarizing the events and reporting to the Government annually. First annual national compilation of statistics achieved for 2007.

a e.g. sudden death with nor clear cause; death by accident; death by killing, suicide, doubtful murder, driven suicide; missing death; or others regulated by law

Table 2. Summary measures of mortality for three provinces in Viet Nam, 2006, and comparisons with other sources Provinces Viet Nam: other sources

Hòa Bình Thừa Thiên–

Huế Bình Dương

DHS 200219

WHO 200620

Census 199921

Indicator

M F M F M F Persons M F M F

Life expectancy at birth (years)

73 80.5 77 82.4 74 79 NA 69 75 NA NA

Child mortalitya 6.4 10.3 2.6 1.0 4.2 4.4 23.6 17 16 NA NA

Adult mortalitya 173 55 52 112 161 79 NA 194 116 NA NA

Completeness of registration at ages > 5

40% 31% 37% 42% 32% 35% NA NA NA NA NA

Total population 392 62

2

401 811

567 087

586 785

436 411

472 593

NA NA NA NA NA

Number of deaths 2057 1287 1748 1470 2103 1805 NA NA NA NA NA

Crude death ratesa 5.2 3.2 3.1 2.5 4.8 3.8 NA NA NA 6.0 4.2

F: female; M: male; NA: not available. a Per 1000 population


of 21

Box 1. Barriers to civil and vital statistics registration in Viet Nam

Structural barriers

Geographic constraints

Limited staff leading to high workload and inefficient services

Inconsistent application of decree

Supporting identity documents sometimes not available

Inconvenient registration policies for non-residents

Inadequate publicity or awareness of registration responsibilities

Social barriers

Reporting period impinges upon burial and mourning customs

Travel costs, registration fees and loss of income for time spent pursuing registration

No perceived social benefit from death registration (as opposed to birth registration)

Sensitivity about reporting of cause of death


of 21

Table 3. Recommendations to strengthen different elements of vital registration systems in Viet Nam System attribute Recommendations

Legal framework

• Clear definitions of live births and fetal deaths in the civil code and professional guidelines • Registration of stillbirths mandated in the civil code • Clear instructions in professional guidelines on registration of births, stillbirths and deaths • Uniform instructions on registration of temporary residents and migrants

Structure and organization

• Active involvement of village headman and health staff as notifiers of vital events to the commune justice clerk to improve completeness of official death records

• Health facilities periodically report institutional vital events directly to Ministry of Justice • Responsibilities given to local health staff for ascertaining cause of deaths that occur at home • Statistical agencies at district and provincial level facilitate data management and quality control

System design

• Implementation of international form of medical certificate of cause of death in health facilities • Design new form to support legal instructions for reporting of stillbirths • Adoption of international perinatal death certificate for perinatal deaths in health facilities • Use of international standard verbal autopsy protocols for ascertaining causes for deaths outside health

facilities • Formats for statistics on deaths by age, sex and cause according to international standards

Data management and quality control

• Introduction of International Classification of Diseases-based coding of underlying causes of death • Computerization of vital records • Establishment of procedures for collation, verification and processing of vital statistics at each level • Periodic evaluation of data quality according to standard criteria

Human resources • Review of staff deployment for vital registration • Training programmes for registration staff, health personnel and statisticians to support reforms in structure,

system design and data management processes

Political will and support

• Establishment of interagency coordination committee including the Ministries of Justice and Health, the General Statistics Office and other stakeholders in civil registration and vital statistics)

• Specified charter of activities, and dissemination of proceedings of committee meetings • Workshops on registration reforms, data quality evaluation, analysis and interpretation for health

bureaucrats and health policy analysts, to enhance political support for improvements in vital registration Public awareness and participation

• Review of registration process to facilitate public participation • Publicity campaigns to highlight responsibilities towards and benefits from birth and death registration


of 21

Fig. 1. Conceptual framework of elements that govern civil registration and vital statistics system operations in Viet Nam

Mortality statistics by

age, sex and cause

Data management and

quality control

VITAL STATISTICS

SYSTEMS

Public participation

Human resources

Legal framework

Structure and organization

System design Political support

CIVIL REGISTRATION SYSTEMS


of 21

Fig. 2. Flow chart depicting the structure and organization of the civil registration and vital statistics system in Viet Nam, 2006

Documentation by 2 witnesses Documentation by employer or head of organization Death notice

ID card, household registration book “Ho Khau”, passport

Health sector or Department of Public Security report

(including documentation from witnesses and head of organization)

Commune people’s committee (Province for foreigners & expatriates)

District Justice Department

Province Justice Department

Ministry of Justice Compilation of annual statistics

Death Certificate

Social security benefits

“Tu Tuat”

Re-marriage

Household registration book “Ho Khau”

Cancellation of registration

Natural death in hospital

Insurance, land & property claims

Unnatural death Natural death in community

Compiling mortality statistics from civil registration ... › bulletin › volumes › 87 › 12...

Documents

Transcript of Compiling mortality statistics from civil registration ... › bulletin › volumes › 87 › 12...