‘Competition generally raises quality.’
42
description
‘Competition generally raises quality.’. ‘I plead guilty to believing in choice and competition’. 2004: £3000. £4,000. £3,000. £2,000. £1,000. 1999: £1000. Pre-1999: no fees. £ 0, 000. 2004: £3000. £ 9 ,000. 2012: £8354. £8,000. £7,000. £6,000. 2011: £6000. £5,000. £4,000. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of ‘Competition generally raises quality.’
‘Competitiongenerally raises quality.’
‘I plead guilty to believing in choice and competition’
2004: £3000
Pre-1999: no fees
1999: £1000£1,000
£3,000
£2,000
£4,000
£0,000
2004: £3000
Pre-1999: no fees
1999: £1000£1,000
£3,000
£2,000
£4,000
£5,000
£6,000
£7,000
£8,000
£0,000
£9,000
2012: £8354
2011: £6000
The Sunday Times Festival of Education
‘The future of British universities is basically America. We’re moving much more to the free market system of America and it’s hugely to be applauded.’ Terence Kealey, June 2011
Distribution of foreign students in tertiary education,by country of destination in 2001 (OECD 2003)
Distribution of foreign students in tertiary education,by country of destination in 2011 (OECD 2013)
International student enrolment as a percentage of total tertiary enrolment in 2011 (OECD, 2013)
Population that has attained tertiary education (2011)Percentage, by age group (OECD 2013)
THE World University Rankings 2011-12: US (dark) vs UK (light) universities
raw data
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0-50 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-250 251-300 301-350 351-400
THE
WU
R to
p-40
0 un
iver
sitie
s
THE World University Rankings 2011-12: US (dark) vs UK (light) universities
corrected for population
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0-50 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-250 251-300 301-350 351-400
univ
ersi
ties
per 6
2.2
mill
ion
popu
latio
n
THE World University Rankings 2011-12: US (dark) vs UK (light) universities
corrected for GDP
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0-50 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-250 251-300 301-350 351-400
univ
ersi
ties
per $
2.28
trill
ion
GD
P
THE World University Rankings 2011-12: US (dark) vs UK (light) universities
corrected for HE spending
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0-50 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-250 251-300 301-350 351-400
univ
ersi
ties
per $
2.73
bill
ion
HE
spe
ndin
g
Aggregate score THE WUR 2011-12, top 200
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Uni
ted
Sta
tes
Uni
ted
Kin
gdom
Net
herla
nds
Ger
man
y
Can
ada
Sw
itzer
land
Aus
tralia
Japa
n
Sw
eden
Fran
ce
Sou
th K
orea
Bel
gium
Den
mar
k
Irela
nd
Isra
el
Nor
way
Finl
and
Spa
in
Aus
tria
New
Zea
land
Bra
zil
aggr
egat
e sc
ore
of to
p-20
0 un
iver
sitie
s
0
20
40
60
80
100
num
ber o
f top
-200
uni
vers
ities
score
universities
Aggregate score / population THE WUR 2011-12, top 200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Sw
itzer
land
Net
herla
nds
Sw
eden
Uni
ted
Kin
gdom
Den
mar
k
Irela
nd
Aus
tralia
Nor
way
Can
ada
Uni
ted
Sta
tes
Bel
gium
Isra
el
New
Zea
land
Finl
and
Ger
man
y
Aus
tria
Fran
ce
Sou
th K
orea
Japa
n
Spa
in
Bra
zil
aggr
egat
e sc
ore
/ pop
ulat
ion
0
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
1.25
1.5
no. t
op-2
00 u
nive
rsiti
es /
popu
latio
n
scores
universities
Aggregate score / GDP (PPP) THE WUR 2011-12, top 200
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Sw
itzer
land
Net
herla
nds
Uni
ted
Kin
gdom
Sw
eden
Den
mar
k
Irela
nd
Aus
tralia
Isra
el
Nor
way
Can
ada
Bel
gium
New
Zea
land
Uni
ted
Sta
tes
Finl
and
Ger
man
y
Aus
tria
Sou
th K
orea
Fran
ce
Japa
n
Spa
in
Bra
zil
aggr
egat
e sc
ores
/ G
DP
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
no. t
op-2
00 u
nive
rsiti
es /
GD
P
scores
universities
Aggregate score / HE spending (PPP)THE WUR 2011-12, top 200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Sw
itzer
land
Uni
ted
Kin
gdom
Net
herla
nds
Sw
eden
Den
mar
k
Irela
nd
Aus
tralia
Bel
gium
Isra
el
Nor
way
New
Zea
land
Ger
man
y
Can
ada
Finl
and
Uni
ted
Sta
tes
Aus
tria
Fran
ce
Sou
th K
orea
Japa
n
Spa
in
Bra
zil
aggr
egat
es s
core
/ H
E s
pend
ing
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
no. t
op-2
00 u
nive
rsiti
es /
HE
spe
ndin
g
scores
universities
Aggregate score / HE spending (PPP)adjusted for % of 25-34 year-old graduates
THE WUR 2011-12, top 200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Sw
itzer
land
Uni
ted
Kin
gdom
Net
herla
nds
Sw
eden
Den
mar
k
Irela
nd
Aus
tralia
Bel
gium
Isra
el
Nor
way
New
Zea
land
Can
ada
Finl
and
Uni
ted
Sta
tes
Ger
man
y
Fran
ce
Sou
th K
orea
Japa
n
Aus
tria
Spa
in
Bra
zil
aggr
egat
e sc
ores
/ H
E s
pend
ing
corr
ecte
d fo
r coh
ort s
ize
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
no. t
op-2
00 u
nive
rsiti
es /
HE
spe
ndin
g
scores
univrsities
Expenditure per student, top 30 universitiesTimes Higher Education World University Rankings, 2012
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
Cal
tech
1
Har
vard
2
Sta
nfor
d 2
Oxf
ord
4
Prin
ceto
n 5
Cam
brid
ge 6
MIT
7
Impe
rial 8
Chi
cago
9
UC
Ber
kele
y 10
Yal
e 11
Col
umbi
a 12
UC
LA 1
3
John
Hop
kins
14
ETH
Zur
ich
15
Pen
nsyl
vani
a 16
UC
L 17
Mic
higa
n-A
nn A
rbor
18
Toro
nto
19
Cor
nell
20
Car
negi
e M
ello
n 21
Brit
ish
Col
umbi
a 22
Duk
e 22
Geo
rgia
Inst
Tec
h 23
Was
hing
ton-
Sea
ttle
24
Nor
thw
este
rn 2
5
Wis
cons
in-M
adis
on 2
6
McG
ill 2
7
Texa
s-A
ustin
28
Toky
o 29
$US
(PPP
)
Driving down costs?
70
75
80
85
90
9519
97
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
grad
uate
em
ploy
men
t rat
e (%
)
Switzerland
UnitedKingdom
OECDaverage
UnitedStates
Japan
South Korea
Endowments of 120 richest US colleges and universities, 2011 (NCES)
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 76 81 86 91 96 101 106 111 116
Institutions (ranked by endowment)
US
dol
lars
(tho
usan
ds)
Endowments of colleges and universities in the US, 2011 (NCES)
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,0001
201
401
601
801
1001
1201
1401
1601
1801
2001
2201
2401
2601
2801
3001
3201
3401
3601
3801
Institutions (ranked by endowment)
US
dol
lars
(tho
usan
ds)
Net worth per head of US population, 2010
next 5% of population
(14%)
bottom 90% of
population (23%)
next 4% of population
(28%)
top 1% of population
(35%)
Endowment per FTE student in US colleges and universities, 2010
bottom 90% of student
body (22%)
next 4 % of student
body (26%)
next 5% of student
body (12%)
top 1% of student
body (40%)
4
Admissions reading list
The Sunday Times Festival of Education
‘The future of British universities is basically America. We’re moving much more to the free market system of America and it’s hugely to be applauded.’ Terence Kealey, June 2011
Endowment per FTE student in US colleges and universities, 2010
bottom 90% of student
body (22%)
next 4 % of student
body (26%)
next 5% of student
body (12%)
top 1% of student
body (40%)
4
In this present crisis, marketisation is not the solution to our problem.
Marketisation IS the problem.
