COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

29
COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008

Transcript of COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Page 1: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA

PMDA’s 16th Annual Symposium

October 24, 2008

Page 2: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Presenters

Kenneth Brubaker, MD, CMD

Geriatric Program Director

Lancaster General Hospital

Lancaster, PA [email protected]

Paula G. Sanders, Esquire

Post & Schell PC17 North 2nd Street,

12th FloorHarrisburg, PA [email protected]

om

Page 3: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Objectives

Define competency and decision-making capacity

Identify ways to evaluate these abilities in patients with dementia

Discuss implications for families and surrogates in making treatment decisions

Page 4: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

What is Competency?

“A threshold requirement, imposed by society, for an individual to retain decision making power in a particular activity or set of activities.”

Daniel Marson, J.D., Ph.D.

Page 5: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Many Types of Capacity

1) Driving2) Living3) Financial4) Medical5) Testamentary

Page 6: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Physician Competency Judgments (%) Normal Controls [n=16]

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

MD 1 -Geripsy

MD 2 -Neurologist

MD 3 -Neurologist

MD 4 -Geriatrician

MD 5 -Geriatrician

Marson et al. 1997 JAGS

CompetentIncompetent

Page 7: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Physician Competency Judgments (%) Mild AD Patients [n=29]

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

MD 1 -Geripsy

MD 2 -Neurologist

MD 3 -Neurologist

MD 4 -Geriatrician

MD 5 -Geriatrician

Marson et al. 1997 JAGS

Competent

Incompetent

Page 8: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Capacity to Consent to Medical Treatment

Autonomy vs. Protection/Safety

Page 9: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Conceptual Model Based on U.S. Case Law

a. Ability to Understandb. Ability to Appreciatec. Ability to Reasond. Ability to Make a Choice

Page 10: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

87 year old retired plumber who has mild dementia (MMSE 22) and type II DM

Renal failure (GFR = 30) CAD (EF 30%) PVD (ABI of .3) Tissue necrosis of the right and left

feet

Page 11: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

What Options are Available for Treatment?

1) Keep comfortable2) Vascular evaluation3) Bilateral amputations

Page 12: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Ability to Understand

Comprehend meaning of the information

Repeat in your own words the facts.

Page 13: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Ability to Appreciate

Recognize the facts apply to you Tell me in your own words what

your medical problem is.

Page 14: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Ability to Choose

Repeat in your own words what options are available.

What is your choice and can consistently hold to the same choice.

Page 15: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Ability to Reason

How will your choice affect you? Why have you eliminated the other

choices?

Page 16: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Dealing with Conflict between POA, Resident, and Care-Giver

a) Educationb) Conflict Resolution (Ethics

Committee)

Page 17: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Shivo case is an example of failed conflict resolution.

Not all conflict can be reached with dysfunctional families.

Occasionally courts will be needed for decision-making.

Page 18: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Tests Used for DMC

1) Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument (CCTI)

Marson, et al, 1995 3 categories – capable, marginally capable,

incapable2) Assessment of Capacity for Everyday Decision

Making (ACED) www.pennadc.org3) Masonic Village tool

Page 19: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Act 169: Incompetent

Unable to understand, make, and communicate health care decisions, even when provided appropriate information and aids.

A resident may be competent to

make some simple health care decisions, but incompetent to make complex decisions.

Page 20: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Act 169: Option for Health Care Agent (Health Care POA Document)

Health Care Agent has very broad power to make health care decisions.

Health Care Agent can make medical treatment decisions before or after the resident is diagnosed with an end stage medical condition or permanent unconsciousness.

Page 21: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Act 169:Option for Health Care Representative

A resident of sound mind may appoint a Health Care Representative(s).

The process is less formal. May be in writing or by verbal consent Health Care Representative may make

decisions regarding life sustaining treatment only if the resident has an end stage medical condition or is permanently unconscious.

Page 22: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Act 169: Option for DefaultHealth Care Representative

An incompetent resident will have a Default Health Care Representative(s) automatically assigned to make medical treatment decisions.

Health Care Representative may make life sustaining treatment decisions only if the principal has an end stage medical condition or is permanently unconscious.

Page 23: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Act 169: The Default Health Care Representative – Priority Class

Spouse and adult child (children) from prior marriage

Adult child (children) Parent(s) Adult sibling(s) Adult grandchild (grandchildren) Close friend(s)

Page 24: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

How Are Health Care Representatives Assigned?

Resident may assign or disqualify one or more Health Care Representatives to make treatment decisions

Resident may adjust or alter the order of priority

Someone from the priority list may step forward and state their intention to be the Health Care Representative

Page 25: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Dispute Resolution Among Health Care Representatives

Follow decisions of highest priority decision-maker

Decision-makers of equal priority must agree on the course of action

Majority decision determines course of action

Page 26: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Dispute Resolution Among Health Care Representatives

If priority class is evenly split: 1. No one else “votes” to break the

tie 2. Ethics Committee involvement 3. Court hearing for appointment of

Guardian of Person

Page 27: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Dispute Resolution Among Health Care Representatives

Medical treatment according to acceptable standards of practice must be started or maintained until a dispute is resolved.

Page 28: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

Documentation Issues

What to write When to write How often to write

Page 29: COMPETENCY ISSUES AND DEMENTIA PMDA’s 16 th Annual Symposium October 24, 2008.

REFERENCES

Marson et al., Cognitive models that predict physician judgments of capacity to consent to mild Alzheimer’s disease. JAGS 45, 458-464, 1997

Appelbaum,P.S.,Grisso,T. (1988) Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine, 319,1635-1638. 

  Marson,D.C., Ingram,K.K.et al (1995) Assessing the competency of

patients with Alzheimer's disease under different legal standards. Archives of Neurology, 52, 949-954.

  Moye,J.,Marson,D.C,  Assessment of Decision-Making Capacity in Older

Adults:An Emerging Area of Practice and Research. Psychological Sciences 2007, vol.628, No. 1, 3-11.

PA Act 169: www.pahealthcaredecisions.wetpaint.com/page/ACT+169%3A+Table+of+Parts+%26+Sections