Competence Not A State But A Continuous Process - ifv.nl · PDF fileCompetence – Not A...
Transcript of Competence Not A State But A Continuous Process - ifv.nl · PDF fileCompetence – Not A...
Competence – Not A State But A Continuous Process
Towards a Strategy for Maintaining Competences of Municipal Crisis
Management Officers
Project Team:
Eline Euwe
Tessa Jussen
Geoffrey De Kock
Sabrina Ulrich
Maike Will
Organizational Coaches:
Sylvia Stronkhorst (IFV)
Nancy Haupts (V&R Academie)
Academic Coach:
Selma Van de Haar
1
List of Abbreviations
AGOZ Academie voor GHOR en Opgeschaalde Zorg
CoPI Commando Plaats Incident
EA Environmental Analyst (Omgevingsanalyst Bevolkingszorg OA-BZ)
GBT Gemeentelijk Beleidsteam
GC General Commander (Algemeen Commandant Bevolkingzorg AC-BZ)
GHOR Medical Assistance Units
KSA Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes
OoD Officer of Duty (Officier van Dienst Bevolkingzorg OvD-BZ)
IFV Instituut Fysieke Veiligheid
OTO Oefenen, Trainen, Opleiden
ROT Regionaal Operationeel Team
RBT Regionaal Beleidsteam
2
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................................. 3
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................... 5
1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................7
2 The Temple of Competence Maintenance – Set-Up of the Project Report ................................. 10
3 The Context of the Project ........................................................................................................................... 11
3.1. Bevolkingszorg and IFV – The Need to Care for the Population .................................................. 11
3.2 A First Step Towards Adequate Population Care – Project GROOT and GROOTER .............. 12
4 Pillar I – An Academic Perspective on Maintaining Competences .................................................. 15
4.1 Conceptualization of Competences ........................................................................................................ 15
4.2 A Special Case – Competence in Crisis Situations ............................................................................. 17
4.3 Skill Deterioration ......................................................................................................................................... 17
4.4 Continuous Learning as a Way to Upkeep the Competence Level.............................................. 18
4.5 Supporting a System of Continuous Learning ................................................................................... 23
5 Pillar II – Inspiration from Practice ............................................................................................................ 26
5.1 The Method .................................................................................................................................................... 26
5.2 Takeaways from Practice ........................................................................................................................... 27
6 Pillar III – Inputs of the Municipal Crisis Management Officers ...................................................... 38
6.1 The Method .................................................................................................................................................... 38
6.2 Takeaways from the Municipal Crisis Management Officers.......................................................... 41
7 Bringing Together The Three Perspectives – Ingredients For A Vision ......................................... 51
7.1 Towards a Vision on Maintaining Competences ................................................................................ 52
7.2 Recommendations ....................................................................................................................................... 57
8 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................................ 67
References .................................................................................................................................................................. 72
List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................ 77
List of Tables.............................................................................................................................................................. 77
Appendices ................................................................................................................................................................ 78
Appendix I ............................................................................................................................................................. 78
Appendix II ............................................................................................................................................................ 79
Appendix III ........................................................................................................................................................... 83
Appendix IV........................................................................................................................................................... 86
3
Acknowledgements
Municipal crisis management officers fulfill a crucial role to ensure safety in exceptional
circumstances in the country. In cooperation with other rescue services they guarantee
that the population is taken care of during crisis situations. It is often a matter of
seconds to decide on the right behavior and a wrong decision can have fatal
consequences. As such adequate performance in their role, which is related to being
competent, is of great importance to fulfill the role of a crisis manager. Continuous
development is necessary in order to uphold that high level of competence. Because of
that need, factors that can contribute to maintaining competence of municipal crisis
management officers are especially worth investigating; and therefore, constitute the
main subject of our investigation. This research project is part of our final course of the
Master’s program Management of Learning at Maastricht University. Feeling privileged
to be given the opportunity to consult the Instituut Fysieke Veiligheid, we would like to
express our appreciation to everyone who contributed to the final product and
provided us with support and feedback throughout the process.
First and foremost, we would like to thank the twelve municipal crisis management
officers who participated in this study and provided us with insights into their roles as
Officer of Duty, General Commander and Environmental Analyst. Despite their tight
schedules, they took some of their valuable time to share their learning needs with us.
This also showed us that although crisis management is not part of their regular job,
staying prepared for crisis situations is of high priority to them. We appreciate that very
much and are very thankful that they took the time. It was very valuable for our research
but also interesting for us personally to listen to their stories. The same appreciation
goes to the eight employees from the rescue services such as the GHOR, the Fire
Department and the Police as well as municipality secretaries and a representative of
V&R Academie who enriched our knowledge about possible strategies to maintain
competences of crisis management officers.
Furthermore, we would like to express our gratitude to our university. Firstly, we thank
the Department of Educational Research and Development for providing us with the
unique opportunity to engage in such a project and for all the support throughout the
process. Secondly, we particularly thank our academic coaches Simon Beausart, Dr.
Ruud Gerards and Sonja Zaar for their inspiration and input for the report’s theoretical
framework. Their ideas and contributions were crucial and facilitated building the
academic foundation for our project, in which we were able to apply the concepts and
knowledge acquired throughout previous courses of this Master program. Thirdly, a
special thanks goes to our tutor Selma van de Haar who stood by our side throughout
4
the whole processes and provided us with detailed feedback, additional information,
motivation and valuable suggestions for a successful completion of the project.
Last but certainly not least, our deepest appreciation is given to our client, the Instituut
Fysieke Veiligheid and Sylvia Stronkhorst in particular, not only for providing this unique
opportunity to work on such a special and challenging project, but also for the pleasant
cooperation, her expert knowledge and feedback, her inspiration and also the
opportunity to and trust in us to share our results to a wider audience within the field of
crisis management.
5
Executive Summary
Context: Given that municipal crisis management officers do not fulfill their crisis role on
a daily basis, the question emerges how they can maintain and further develop their
crisis competences in order to stay prepared for possible crisis situations.
Purpose: The main aim of this project is to provide IFV with insights in 1) an academic
perspective on maintaining competences, 2) the vision of different rescue services and
additional information sources on maintaining competences (for instance GHOR, Fire
Department, and Police) and 3) the learning needs of the municipal crisis management
officers. The results of this project support IFV in developing a vision on how they can
support municipalities to effectively maintain the competences of crisis management
officers.
Methodology: In our report we build an
architectural model of maintaining
competence. Pillar I includes an extensive
literature review on maintaining competences.
Pillar II includes insights into the vision of
different rescue services on maintaining
competences through eight open interviews
and supporting documents. Pillar III includes
the results of semi-structured interviews
which were conducted with twelve municipal
crisis management officers. Based on these
three pillars ingredients for a vision and
recommendations how this can be achieved
are formulated.
Results: Based on the integration of the findings of the three pillars, we conclude that
maintaining competences is a continuous process which requires a systematic
approach. Additionally, this systematic approach should be uniform and bottom-up
designed, in order to foster acceptance and ensure the same level of preparedness
among regions. Furthermore, the continuous learning process should include formal,
informal and social learning in which the specific crisis context should be taken into
account. Also, these learning activities should be flexible and adaptable to the learning
needs of each officer. Lastly, we found that the responsibility should be shared between
the individual, the municipality, the safety region and IFV. The following table provides
information about how a system of continuous learning can be designed.
6
Recommendation How?
Formal learning
1) Multidisciplinary simulation trainings
Obligatory
Frequency of 1-3 times a year
Focus on thorough evaluation
2) Follow-up training
Tailor made to the specific learning needs
Focus on core competences
Informal learning
1) Observe other municipalities who are dealing with crisis
2) Use e-learning and/or Mobile Applications
Social learning
1) Learning is fun!
Organizing trainings/seminars/workshops in other
places than the workplace (e.g. a trip to de Efteling)
2) Create a mentor system
3) Assign ‘piket-partners’
4) Attend crisis evaluation meetings of other
municipalities
5) Play a figurant-role in simulation trainings
6) Building a network
Periodic assessments
1) Periodic assessment
Training and/or (written) follow-up exam
2) Feedback meetings after training and/or crisis
incidents
3) Colleagues who fill in an (anonymous) survey
4) The use of competence scans
Reflection
1) Team reflection
Create a psychological safe environment
Use ‘learning-arenas’
2) Individual reflection
Keep a ‘progress-diary’
Use 360° feedback
Use the STARR method
E-learning system and/or mobile
application
1) E-learning system
Include information regarding training content
Include evaluations of training and/or incidents
Use Quiz-questions to support the periodic
assessment
System enables knowledge sharing, building a
network and keeping officers up to-date
7
1 Introduction
When written in Chinese, the word 'crisis' is composed of two characters. One
represents danger and the other represents opportunity.
John F. Kennedy
Crisis incidents can occur anywhere at any point in time. Recent events such as a gas
explosion in Heerlen, Limburg are proof of that. This explosion left 42 apartments
uninhabitable, seriously injured three persons and left dozens of people homeless for
weeks. The costs of the repairs were estimated on around 59 million euros (1Limburg,
2015). As this example shows, often crises can have catastrophic consequences both
from a human as well as a governmental perspective; lives are at stake, people lose their
homes and everything they possess. Furthermore, failure to respond to and effectively
handle a crisis situation can cause public unrest with severe consequences. It follows
without saying that it is highly important to have competent people handling crises.
They are in charge of preventing or managing catastrophic disasters, communicating
with the public, saving lives and property and providing security for their citizens
(Farazmand, 2007).
When thinking about crises, our minds immediately turn to the well-known heroes from
the Fire Department, the medical assistance units (GHOR en Opgeschaalde Zorg
hereafter referred to as GHOR) or the Police. However, incidents such as the one
mentioned above, do not only require the involvement of those rescue services but also
the work of municipality officers. Next to the rescue services, they are involved in crisis
incidents from the very first moment they occur. While the Fire Department, the Police
and GHOR disappear after the immediate danger of the crisis is over, the most
substantial work of the municipalities has only begun. These tasks for example include
giving out information to inhabitants of municipalities, providing shelter and care for
those that are in need, supplying post-care to inhabitants as well as registering victims
and cases of damage (Bruinooge, Bitter, Helsloot, Dekker, Stierhout & Langelaar, 2014).
This shows that not only rescue services but also municipal crisis management officers
are essential for successful crisis management.
To prepare municipalities for the difficult tasks of crisis management, the Dutch Council
of Safety instructed the Institute for Physical Safety or Instituut Fysieke Veiligheid (IFV)
to set up and maintain high quality education and training for officers of municipalities
who fulfill a role during crises. IFV has identified 17 different municipal positions for
different crisis management tasks. For these positions qualification profiles were
defined, which for instance include the type of competences needed for effective
8
performance during crisis incidents. Based on these qualification profiles, commercial
training institutes designed initial trainings for municipality officers, which are followed
by an official exam (IFV, 2015).
While this training certifies municipality officers as crisis managers, they still largely differ
from the rescue services in one important aspect. Whereas for instance police officers
and fire fighters deal with difficult, crisis-like situations on a daily basis, municipality
officers’ regular jobs are often distinct from crisis management. This has implications for
the level of competence of these officers as experience is one essential factor in staying
competent to effectively handle crisis situations. This is also shown by the quote of J.F.
Kennedy. While every crisis represents a large danger, it at the same time also
represents an opportunity for practice and learning. Specifically, every time a crisis
incident is dealt with, people and organizations involved in the process gain experience
and learn what is going well and what could be improved. This ultimately contributes to
continuous learning and thus staying prepared. As municipality officers often perform
different job-related tasks during their daily job (cold phase) than they would in a crisis
situation (warm phase), the specific competences that are taught in the initial training
are not necessarily used on a regular basis. This implies that the level of proficiency of
those competences is likely to decrease over time. The question emerges whether
officers who participated in the initial training are still competent to perform effectively
in a crisis situation.
While IFV has already sufficiently covered the assignment of ‘becoming competent’, the
subject of ‘staying competent’ has not yet been investigated. This subject however gains
in significance in the context of municipal crisis management, especially in the case of
very low crisis incident frequency. Consequently, the follow-up question arises: how can
the acquired skills, knowledge and competences in the initial training be maintained
and/or further developed. So far, a uniform approach to maintaining competences of
municipal crisis management officers is lacking. Therefore, IFV aims at developing such
a vision. To support this objective, in a period of seven weeks, we have planned and
conducted a project. In this project we have explored an academic perspective on
maintaining competences, have gained an overview of current views and insights from
rescue services and additional information sources from the field, and collected
information about the learning needs of municipal crisis management officers. For the
scope of this project, we focused on three specific municipal crisis management roles.
These were the General Commander (GC), Officer of Duty (OoD) and the Environmental
Analyst (EA). These insights helped us to provide IFV with possible ingredients for a
strategy to effectively maintain competences of those officers. The results of our project
9
support IFV in developing a vision on how municipality officers can maintain
competences relevant for their roles during crisis incidents.
The following overall and specific objectives guided us throughout the process of our
project.
Overall objective
Provision of an overview of strategies to facilitate continuous learning of municipal
crisis management officers for staying prepared for crisis situations.
Specific objectives
Summary of theoretical insights on how competences can be maintained
through continuous learning (formal, informal and social learning).
Summary of practical insights on how competences for crisis management
can be maintained. Insights are collected through field research within
different rescue services (GHOR, Fire Department and Police) and
additional information sources from the field.
Summary of the learning needs of a sample of General Commanders,
Officers of Duty and Environmental Analysts. These are identified through
interviews in different safety regions to get an insight into the diversity of
the learners.
Summary and analysis of all gathered input including our field research.
Inputs are translated into ingredients that can be incorporated in the
overall vision of IFV on how to approach the maintenance of competences
of municipal crisis management officers. Additionally, recommendations on
how a vision on continuous learning can be implemented are given.
10
2 The Temple of Competence Maintenance – Set-Up of the Project Report
In this section we provide the reader with
the set-up of our project and a
suggestion on how the report can be
read. In order to give some insights into
the context of our project, we start this
report by providing an overview of
population care in the Netherlands and
what IFV’s role has been in this
undertaking. The remains of this report
are designed in an architectural structure.
As we received information from a variety
of sources, we categorized this
information into three separate pillars that
build the foundation of our architectural
model. The higher layers of our model
represent our advice regarding possible
ingredients of a vision on maintaining and
developing competences as well as our recommendations on how this can be achieved.
The roof (IFV’s vision) has to be constructed by IFV on this basis in a later step. If follows
naturally that there is a certain overlap between the three pillars as commonalities were
deliberately highlighted and used as the foundation for our ingredients for the vision
and recommendations. Figure 1 provides an overview of our structure. Throughout the
report, we will enrich this model step by step.
Guideline for Reader
To guide the reader through our line of reasoning, we have highlighted our main
takeaways from each of the three pillars with the use of blue boxes throughout the
report. Additionally, we have provided a summary box at the end of each pillar. This
summary gives an overview of the main findings of that particular section. In Figure 7
(Section 7), a summary of our architectural model brings together all our findings. The
detailed explanation in the text provides a solid reasoning on how we reached these
conclusions.
Figure 1: Temple structure of the project report
11
3 The Context of the Project
In this section we briefly explain the background of our project. We start by describing
population care in the context of municipal crisis management. In a next step, we focus
on the topic of becoming and staying competent in reference to the project GROOT
and GROOTER. It is not the aim of this section to provide a complete overview of
population care in the Netherlands. Rather we highlight the most relevant information
for the scope of our project.
3.1. Bevolkingszorg and IFV – The Need to Care for the Population
Bevolkingszorg or population care is an essential part of crisis management prior,
during and after a crisis. To ensure adequate population care, the Instituut Fysieke
Veiligheid has supported in providing a realistic vision on how population care can best
be coordinated. IFV has been involved in this as they support the 25 safety regions1 in
the Netherlands in the field of crisis management (www.ifv.nl).
The new vision on population care describes a
uniform and standardized approach and is
reported in the document Bevolkingszorg 2.0. This
document represents a general national guideline
on what municipality care should look like. It
provides stimulation and a source of inspiration for
municipalities to organize population care in a
contemporary and realistic manner. The main
elements of the population care are summarized in
Figure 2.
One central theme and a major transformation
within the population care is that governments
should not provide maximum care at all times, but
that a part of the care can also be provided by the
citizens themselves (self-sustainability). The tasks
of the government should then be to provide
information and set up a communication structure
to support the self-sustainability. This aspect is based on the finding that the majority of
1 A safety region in the Netherlands is an area in which multiple boards and services of municipalities
work together with respect to several safety related subjects such as firefighting, disaster- and crisis-
management, and maintaining public order and safety.
Figure 2: Municipal Population Care
(Bevolkingszorg 2.0, 2014)
12
citizens involved in a crisis can act rationally and thus can take care of themselves, while
only a small part is dependent on governmental care. To ensure that everyone is taken
care of, it is the government’s task to stimulate and facilitate self-sustainability for those
who are able to provide for themselves while giving special care to those who are not.
Additionally, it was shown that citizens can take care for other citizens during and after
the crisis. As such it should be the government’s task to incorporate and make use of
spontaneous help from the society (Bruinooge et al., 2014)2.
While the Bevolkingszorg 2.0 provides national guidelines on what should be done, a
further step was taken to answer the question of how the population care should be
organized. In this context the qualification profiles as a product of the projects GROOT
and GROOTER are relevant.
3.2 A First Step Towards Adequate Population Care – Project GROOT and GROOTER
To ensure the execution of adequate population care as described in the
Bevolkingszorg 2.0, the project GROOT was initiated in 2009 which was followed by
project GROOTER in 2012. Project GROOT was based on the initial question of what can
be done to improve practice and learning of municipal crisis management officers. Until
then, within Bevolkingszorg there was no differentiation with regard to the basic
training for the particular municipal roles in crisis management. Acknowledging the
diversity of roles within municipal crisis management, several roles with corresponding
qualification profiles, training frameworks and models for examinations were developed
as part of this project. Each role is unique and contains the competences that would be
most crucial in the field. In cooperation with commercial parties, suitable trainings were
developed to ensure sufficient preparedness of the municipal crisis managers. To ensure
an adequate qualification level after the initial training, IFV has taken the responsibility
of accrediting these commercial parties and of taking the examinations of trainees.
Three of these roles will be of primary interest for the scope of our project. These roles
are the General Commander, the Officer of Duty and the Environmental Analyst. The
most central aspects of these profiles are outlined below (Figure 3). The full qualification
profiles (language Dutch) are accessible online.
2 For further information on what population care should provide we refer to the document
‘Bevolkingszorg 2.0’
13
Figure 3: Extract from Qualification profiles regarding core tasks and qualities of the three roles
While the main attention has so far been paid to adequately prepare municipal crisis
managers for crisis situations in terms of identifying the needed competences and
ensuring adequate initial training, the qualification profiles also include a section which
addresses the maintaining of competences:
“The [role] maintains the abovementioned knowledge, skills and competences
during his regular job and through (re)training and practice. With competences is
meant: being able to execute the mentioned core tasks with the needed quality
and considering the specific context, partly dependent on the specific choices
and dilemma’s inherent in the role. The [role] at minimum fulfills the obligations
set by the regional Educational, Training and Practice (OTO) Policy. Maintaining
competences is both the employer’s and the employee’s responsibility.”3
Additionally, the Werkboek Competentiegericht Oefenen (2006) addresses some
developmental opportunities in the ‘Language of Learning Theory’. This includes the
following categories: learning by looking at others, participating, obtaining knowledge,
3 Original Quote in Dutch.
14
practicing, discovering. This implies that in theory the obligation to maintain
competences already exists. Also, in practice almost all safety regions already possess a
program for practice, training and exercise, Oefenen, Trainen, Opleiden (OTO). This joint
program is however initiated by the regions and mainly focusses on the key officers of
the multidisciplinary bodies (CoPI, ROT and RBT) (De Swarte, 2014). As such, it does not
provide specific learning experiences for each municipal role. Additionally, strategies for
OTO differ significantly throughout regions and there is no uniform approach to staying
competent yet. As such, a vision and concrete guidelines on how to maintain and, if
necessary, further develop the competence level of municipal crisis management
officers over time is as of yet, non-existent.
15
4 Pillar I – An Academic Perspective on Maintaining Competences
In this section we introduce our first pillar and provide findings from the academic
perspective on competence maintenance. First, we review literature on the
conceptualization of competence and competences specific to crisis management.
Second, we explain the problem of skill deterioration from an academic perspective.
Finally, we explore ways to overcome this skill deterioration by introducing the concept
of continuous learning. This includes several sub-concepts such as formal, informal and
social learning as well as reflection and e-learning. Next to creating a first pillar on
which recommendations for maintaining competences are based, the concepts used in
this section formed the theoretical basis for our interviews by helping to develop
questions for the rescue services and to design the questionnaire for the municipal crisis
management officers.
4.1 Conceptualization of Competences
In the context of maintaining competences of municipal crisis management officers, it is
important to clearly understand what competence is and how it is linked to skills,
knowledge, and personal characteristics. Understanding the single components of
competence can help to understand which specific tools can support maintaining both
the individual components such as knowledge and skills as well as the overarching basic
and job specific competences.
Competence is defined as “an acquired capacity to adequately perform a task, duty or
role” (Roe, 2002, p. 2006). As such, being competent depends on the degree to which
someone takes appropriate and effective action for a specific role or performs
adequately in a particular context (Batram & Roe, 2008; Rodolfa, Bent, Eisman, Melson,
Rehm, Ritchie, 2005). This for instance requires judgment, critical thinking, and decision
making capabilities. Possessing knowledge and skills alone is however insufficient for
someone to be considered competent (Rodolfa et al., 2005). Roe’s (1999) architectural
model of competence (Figure 4) provides a useful tool to understand the relationship
between competence, skills and knowledge.
16
Knowledge, Skills and
Attitudes
As three pillars, knowledge,
skills and attitudes (KSAs)
function as a basis on which
competences are built. The
knowledge refers to specific
knowledge which is relevant
to adequately perform a task.
Skills refer to the “actions (and
reactions) which an individual
performs in a competent way in order to achieve a goal” (Ericsson, 1996). Also for
municipal crisis management officers, specific skills and knowledge are required to
perform effectively in a particular situation. These are defined in the qualification
profiles respectively. Besides knowledge and skills, an appropriate attitude is necessary
for the proper practice of the profession (Batram & Roe, 2005). As one can see in the
architectural model, the development of KSAs is determined by various factors, such as
abilities, personality traits and other characteristics related to individuals’ biographies
(Batram & Roe, 2005).
Basic and Job- and Context Specific Competences
The actual competences are built on these three pillars and are displayed in the roof of
the architectural model. There are two types of competences (Batram & Roe, 2005). The
first type is the basic competences. These are more generic in nature and are focused
on the fulfillment of certain types of tasks or demands (Batram
& Roe, 2008). These types of competences can be used in a
wide range of situations and include competences such as
decision-making or planning capacity (Batram & Roe, 2008).
Above these basic competences, there are job and context
specific competences. These are a combination of knowledge,
skills and attitudes as well as a number of basic competences. They refer to a specific
set of knowledge, skills and attitudes needed for a particular role and correspond to the
distinct work duties (Batram & Roe, 2005; Batram & Roe, 2008). In the context of crisis
management officers, these job-related competences are those that are specific to the
particular role of the crisis officer and lead to effective functioning in his or her role. As a
lot of knowledge and skills are context-related, it cannot readily be assumed that being
competent in one context also implies being competent in another context (Batram &
1. Competences
are not always
transferable among
different contexts.
Figure 4: Architectural Model of Competence (Roe, 1999)
17
Roe, 2005). This is also crucial in crisis management as crises vary in their scope and
consequently being competent in one crisis situation does not necessarily mean being
competent in all crisis situations. Therefore, it is not sufficient to regard the
development of competences as a one-fits-all approach but activities need to take the
changing contexts into account.
4.2 A Special Case – Competence in Crisis Situations
Competences within the field of crisis situations are different from other professions.
This is because coping with “inconceivability and hyper-uncertainty” in modern public
management requires a set of knowledge, skills, and a sense of urgency that is distinct
(Farazmand, 2007, p. 149). Due to the ever-changing environment, crises produce
dynamics that no one can predict and control (Farazmand, 2007). Tomorrow’s
emergency crisis management systems will be much tougher, much more complex, as
the world’s challenges will be more “inconceivable” (Dror, 2001), “unthinkable” (Handy,
1998), and “unknowable” (Stacey, 1992). A lack of preparedness and training may lead to
complete chaos and costly misunderstandings as a result
of communication failures (Farazmand, 2007). Therefore,
competence in those situations requires crisis
management officers to be adequately prepared for these
new demands through on-the-job learning and
continuous application.
One essential problem here is that there is generally a big gap between the routine
tasks of governance and administration that municipal officers face in their daily job and
the emergency, non-routine tasks during a crisis situation (Schneider, 1995). The
competences needed to effectively handle crisis situations are mostly not used during
their daily work but are specific to the crisis situation. Skills and knowledge that are not
used on a daily basis may deteriorate and become obsolete. In the following, we will
discuss why this is the case.
4.3 Skill Deterioration
Skills obsolescence is defined as “the degree to which […]
professionals lack the […] knowledge or skills necessary to
maintain effective performance […]” (Kaufman, 1989, p. 74).
Two ways to look at skills obsolescence are particularly
relevant for the scope of this report. The first perspective
2. The unpredictability
of crisis situations
requires constant
learning.
3. Skills deteriorate
over time if they are
not used regularly.
18
looks at skills obsolescence as atrophy of skills. This atrophy considers the deterioration
of the skill itself and is caused by a lack of or insufficient use of particular skills (De Grip
& Van Loo, 2002). Skills and knowledge that people do not apply in their job may decay
or may even be lost completely over time. This leads to a feeling of insufficient
preparedness for a particular situation. The second relevant perspective refers to job-
specific skills obsolescence (De Grip & Van Loo, 2002). As a result of technological
developments and consequential new skill requirements, the skills of workers become
obsolete. Thus, it is important to stay up to date and constantly acquire and develop
new skills and knowledge (De Grip & van Loo, 2002).
To overcome skills obsolescence and to remain sufficiently prepared, continuous
investment in human capital throughout the career is required. Developmental activities,
both formal and non-formal, can contribute to continuous investment as they can help
to combat obsolescence (Kaufman, 1982). The next section discusses continuous
learning as a way to combat skills obsolescence and provides insights on how it is
related to practice.
4.4 Continuous Learning as a Way to Upkeep the Competence Level
In order to stay competent throughout the career, it is important to consider learning
activities not as discrete steps but as a continuous process. Continuous learning – also
known as life-long learning – is a concept that appears throughout many research
disciplines as well as in organizational practice. With its origin
in educational research, continuous learning describes an
ongoing learning process of a person throughout his or her
life (Cropley 1980). Transferring the concept to organizations,
continuous learning can be defined as the process by which
individual and/or organizational learning is facilitated on a
constant basis (Tannenbaum, 1997). Such lifelong learning
becomes increasingly necessary to stay on top of the
changing environment and to prevent obsolescence of skills and competences (Maurer,
2002). As mentioned before, this plays an especially important role in the fast changing
environment of crisis management as competences not only have to be maintained but
also further developed and updated on a regular basis.
Tannenbaum (1997) envisioned continuous learning as an ongoing cycle of learning
experiences, application, recognition and motivation to learn (see Figure 5). Learning
experiences can present themselves in many different forms. They can for example be a
training, advice from a colleague or they can stem from learning by doing. Through this
4. Continuous
learning helps to
prevent skills
obsolescence as well
as it helps to stay up
to date.
19
experience, skills and knowledge are developed or updated. For municipal crisis
managers, such learning experiences include everything that is done to prepare for the
crisis situation. A very important learning experience is the initial training but also other
learning activities – formal or non-formal are included here. After the learning
experience, an opportunity for application has to follow through which competences
are consolidated. If this application is missing, skill deterioration can be the
consequence. In the best-case scenario, the officers get the chance to apply everything
they learned in a real crisis. Since that is not always possible, a simulation might also
provide a chance for application that is at least close to reality. Simulations place
trainees in life-like situations that
provide immediate feedback
about questions, decisions, and
actions (Issenberg, McGaghie,
Hart, Mayer, Felner, Petrusa,
Waugh Brown, Safford, Gessner,
Gordon, Ewy, 1999). Compared to
a real crisis, simulations provide
an opportunity where
competence can be acquired
under the supervision of an
instructor (Batram & Roe, 2008). If
an opportunity is taken, either in a real crisis or simulated setting, and the competences
are utilized, some kind of recognition or reward has to follow. Such recognition will lead
to an increase in motivation to learn and will fuel the individual and/or the organization
to engage in new learning experiences. Recognition does not have to be materialistic
but can also be the positive feedback of a superior. Only if all the elements of the cycle
are regarded and properly aligned, continuous learning will be achieved (Tannenbaum,
1997).
There are several ways to encourage and support
continuous learning. Most importantly, actions have to
be taken by both the organization and the individual
within it to ensure continuity (Marsick & Watkins, 2003).
The individual has to take on the responsibility to
recognize and communicate his or her own learning
needs. It is essential that the individual has some intrinsic
motivation for his or her self-development in order to take initiatives and to be
receptive for learning opportunities (London & Smither, 1999). It is however not
sufficient to only hold the individual responsible. The organization has to provide a
5. The responsibility for
continuous learning
should lie with both the
individual and the
organization.
Figure 5: Continuous Learning Cycle (Tannenbaum, 1997)
20
learning environment that enables continuous learning as well as it has to provide the
resources necessary for it (Marsick & Watkins, 2003).
A learning environment that fosters continuous learning and supports the transfer from
training to application is characterized by a high degree of psychological safety, ample
opportunities to apply new competences and high social support. To explain this in
more detail, psychological safety describes a state in which every member of a team (or
an organization) feels safe to take interpersonal risks (Edmondson, 1999). Such safe
environment does not only help individuals to engage in training activities but also
encourages them to voice concerns or reflect on poor performance. This also plays a
role for the second characteristic, the opportunities for practice, as these opportunities
will add the most value if they can be openly reflected upon (Catino, 2008). Last but not
least, social support refers to the help and encouragement of co-workers as well as
supervisors. Helping to reschedule work activities to enable the individual to participate
in training or showing support and interest for it are examples of this (Tannenbaum
1997). Relating back to crisis management, municipality officers need to feel safe to
fulfill their role as a crisis manager. They need to feel supported by their colleagues and
superiors during a crisis incident but also in the whole preparation process. One step to
ensure a continuous learning cycle is to design a system of continuous learning which
can include the formal, informal and social learning.
A System of Formal, Informal and Social Learning
As stated before, learning can take on many different shapes and sizes. For the purpose
of this project, we focus on three kinds of learning. These are formal, informal and social
learning. Various authors have suggested that these three types of activities have a
significant meaning for learning and can thus contribute to the maintenance and
development of different aspects of competences.
Formal Learning
Formal learning is defined as those learning activities that are structured and planned. It
is particularly important in the development of knowledge and skills, but also for basic
competences such as leadership (Rodolfa et al., 2005). These structured and planned
learning activities usually take place outside of the working environment in a formal
educational setting (Marsick & Watkins, 2001). Examples of formal learning are the
training and development programs that are offered by an organization (Manuti,
Pastore, Scardigno, Giancaspro & Morciano, 2015). Hence, in the case of municipal crisis
21
management, formal learning is taking place via the initial training and the exams.
These are developed by the Instituut Fysieke Veiligheid and the commercial training
institutes such as V&R Academie. In this formal learning process municipal officers
participate in order to get certified. This can be seen as a kind of recognition for
engaging in the learning activity. Naturally, all other trainings that are set up in a similar
manner also belong to this category. One important aspect that has to be regarded in
the design of formal learning activities is that the trainings should always be fitted to the
participants’ learning needs to avoid wasting time and energy of everyone involved
(Salas, Tannenbaum, Kraiger & Smith-Jentsch, 2012).
Informal Learning
Informal learning in contrast describes rather unstructured learning activities that often
occur spontaneously (Dale & Bell, 1999). Examples of informal learning include self-
directed learning, learning by doing through an inductive process of reflection and
action as well as incidental learning that takes place unconsciously (Marsick & Watkins,
2001). Informal learning is much more difficult to grasp than formal learning as it does
not take place in a structured classroom setting but can occur wherever people have
the need, motivation, and opportunity to learn. It is even to some extent influenced by
chance (Marsick & Volpe, 1999). As it was stated by Eraut (2004) informal learning
cannot be forced, but only be nurtured. Nevertheless, informal is very important in the
context of competence development and thus also maintenance. While knowledge and
skills can be developed in an initial training and formal education, actual competences
continue to be enhanced throughout the career (Batram & Roe, 2005; Rodolfa et al.,
2005).
Social Learning
A third kind of learning that can be differentiated is social learning – or learning from
others (Wilson, Van Velsor, Chandrasekar, & Criswell, 2011). Even though it is closely
linked to informal learning, this learning type explicitly evolves around the relationships
between people. It is argued that participating in a community will automatically have
some effect on the members’ learning and development due to both social and
knowledge exchanges (Wenger, 1998). Such communities are also called ‘communities
of practice’. They are self-organizing as they focus around specific topics or activities
and therefore attract everyone who is interested in or concerned with them. For a
community of practice to function, a shared repertoire of ideas, experiences and
22
commitments needs to be generated. Furthermore, resources such as routines,
documents, stories, vocabulary and symbols that represent the accumulated knowledge
of the community are needed. This requires practice within the community, hence there
need to be specific ways of doing things (Wenger, 2000).
Connecting to municipal crisis management officers, social learning could make a very
valuable contribution to the overall learning process. Especially people in the same roles
can learn from each other’s experiences. To support and structure this learning, regular
conferences, formal or informal meetings or get-togethers can be organized. Moreover,
a common channel for communication as for example an online platform can be
provided as a tool to collect and share stories, documents and other experiences.
Each type of learning contributes to the continuous learning process to a different
amount. Tannenbaum (1997) for example found that only 5%-9% of the development
can be attributed to formal learning activities. Such
numbers are also reflected in the 70-20-10 framework of
learning. This popular model is based on the idea that
about 70% of all learning and development is done by
means of informal learning. 20% can be attributed to
social learning and only 10% to formal learning activities
(Wilson et al., 2011). Whereas this model is very popular in
theory, it is rarely implemented in a systematic way in practice. Hence, rather than as a
guide for how learning should be structured, the model should be seen as way of how
different learning activities can be combined to form a system (Garavan, Carbery &
Rock, 2012). Furthermore, the ratio of distribution between the three types of learning in
this model does not mean that informal and social learning add more value than formal
learning. Instead it is important to remember that all types of learning have their place
in the continuous learning cycle. Moreover, formal learning has been found to stimulate
informal learning and can therefore help to stimulate and continue the cycle (De Grip,
2008). Hence, even though formal training cannot be relied on as the only source of
learning, it nevertheless embodies an important part of continuous learning and should
be well thought through (Tannenbaum, 1997).
6. A system for
continuous learning
should include elements
of formal, informal and
social learning.
23
4.5 Supporting a System of Continuous Learning
Reflection
A very important component of continuous learning and thus maintaining competences
is reflection. Whereas reflection is mainly attributed to informal learning, it can also take
on a valuable role in formal and social learning. Reflection is defined as “the process of
stepping back from an experience to ponder carefully and persistently its meaning to
the self through the development of inferences” (Daudelin, 1997, p.39). While the
catalyst for the reflection is external, and while others may help in the process by
listening, asking questions, or offering advice, the reflection occurs within the mental
self and is thus a highly personal cognitive process. Reflection provides individuals with
the opportunity to slow down, and engage in processes that permit individuals to reflect
upon important areas (Daudelin, 1997). In fact, incidents in form of crises provide
valuable learning products (Drupsteen & Guldenmund, 2014). Reflection on past
incidents, either personally experienced or by someone else, helps to evaluate what
went well and what did not go well and thus offers potential for improvement (Madsen
& Desai, 2010). Reflection should thus not only be seen as an ‘add-on’ to learning, but
as an essential component of good quality learning and the representation of that
learning.
Reflection can take place both consciously and unconsciously on several levels. It is not
unlikely that reflection happens outside an individual’s awareness and therefore rather
informally (Daudelin, 1997). During unconscious reflection, a spontaneous sorting
through the existing information allows one to momentarily suspend the intense flow of
new information to the brain. This enhances the processing of existing information,
thereby better preparing the person to handle the demands of the rapidly changing
environment (Daudelin, 1997).
Reflection can however also happen in a systematic and planned setting. Numerous
tools for reflection on incidents are discussed in literature (Drupsteen & Guldenmund,
2014). One way for formal reflection could be to build it into the formal classroom
training by adding some time for reflection at the conclusion of each experience. Also,
the process of individual reflection can trigger questions that can be then taken to be
answered during further developmental activities (Wahlström, 2011). Tools for individual
reflection could be learning journals, learning logs or learning conversations.
Next to this individual level, reflection can also take place on a group level though. This
is especially linked to social learning as it is often the case that support is needed for
individuals to make sense out of developmental experiences (Daudelin, 1997). People
24
that can provide support are mostly more experienced or have the ability to function as
a facilitator. Within a group or a community of practice, reflection often helps to
develop new ideas by sharing different perspectives. People share good practices or
negative experiences to learn from each other and to increase their knowledge (Lampel,
Shasie & Shapira, 2009).
As mentioned before, a very important prerequisite for successful reflection activities is
a safe and supportive learning environment. As for any kind of learning, this
environment should be characterized by trust and openness in which blaming behavior
should be avoided. People need to feel comfortable to share their experiences with
others (Catino, 2008; Dekker, 2009). An absence of trust can lead to faulty reporting
which limits the information availability to be learned from. Also people need to be
respected and feel that their knowledge is useful and that there is also a need for open
communication through common language and shared tools (Edmondson, 1999).
E-Learning
Besides reflection, e-learning can also support formal,
informal and social learning activities. This academic field is
still in its infancy. Nevertheless, several authors have
conducted promising research into the effectiveness of
technological tools and training. Burke and Hutchings (2007)
suggest that technological tools are very useful in reinforcing
training and learning. Moreover, these tools provide a
significant increase in transfer of training. Furthermore, research by Harun (2001)
suggests that e-learning can be conducted at the workplace as well as at home. Thus,
introducing such tools can also aid in developing a crisis mindset outside of the incident
situation. Harun (2001) also argues that e-learning is particularly useful in jobs that face
the “constant and unrelenting need for appropriate management and leveraging of the
knowledge base so that it is readily available and accessible to all stakeholders within
the workplace environment” (p. 301). This is relevant for the context of crisis
management which is characterized by a high degree of uncertainty with changing
demands. As such e-learning can be a valuable tool to overcome the problem
regarding maintaining a contemporary knowledge base. Whilst implementing such tools
is related to high costs, there is great potential for bridging gaps between formal
training and informal training on a continuous basis. Hence, through technological tools
municipality officers can actively maintain their competences, where and when they
have time and motivation.
7. Opportunities of
reflection and e-
learning can support
continuous learning.
25
… municipal crisis management officers need to have appropriate knowledge,
skills and an appropriate attitude to be competent.
… skill deterioration caused by insufficient use of skills and unpredictability of
crises leads to the need for continuous learning.
… continuous learning should be designed as a system. Formal learning activities
help to maintain and develop skills and knowledge. They need to fit to the
learning needs of the trainees. Informal learning is a way to enhance
competences outside of formal training activities. Social learning fosters
knowledge exchange and learning from (others’) experiences.
… a system of continuous learning can be supported by reflection and e-
learning. Reflection is a way to learn from experiences and directs attention
towards improvement. E-learning helps to stay up to date and to develop a
crisis mind-set as it can be also used outside of work.
… the responsibility for continuous learning has to be shared between the
individual (communicating learning needs) and the organization (providing
learning environment and resources).
From Pillar I we have learned that…
26
5 Pillar II – Inspiration from Practice
The second pillar of our approach is built upon interviews with representatives of
different rescue services, namely the Police, the GHOR and the Fire Department. We
supplemented these insights with a variety of additional sources on maintaining
competences such as a vision of education from the GHOR and the Fire Department.
The goal of these interviews was to gain an overview of how these organizations
currently approach the maintenance of crisis management competences as well as to
gain insights into possible ingredients for a vision. Additional interviews were conducted
with representatives of the municipalities who are involved in the organization of crisis
management and the project GROOT(ER) as well as V&R Academie. These interviews
contributed to more insights about the overall project and the design of the initial
training.
5.1 The Method
We conducted eight interviews via Skype, FaceTime and in person that lasted an
average of one hour. Table 1 in the Appendix I provides a list of all interview partners,
stating their job role and the organization they represent. The interviews focused on the
following core topics: their approach to and vision on maintaining competences
including specific activities, the influence of stress on the performance level, room for
informal learning and cooperation. See extract 1 in the Appendix I for an example of an
interview agenda. In a next step, we summarized each interview based on the core
topics discussed. The statements from the interview partners as well as additional
information sources are categorized according to several key findings. It is important to
note that these themes are not ranked according to priority but follow the order of the
interviews.
When reading this section it is also important to keep in mind that not all information is
related to our main topic maintaining competences. However, during the interviews we
noticed that we received a lot of valuable additional information or takeaways. These
will not be included in the design of our ingredients for a vision and recommendations
but will be revisited in the conclusion.
27
5.2 Takeaways from Practice
Selection Process
The first topic that was discussed is the selection process. According to two
representatives from the Police, the goal of the selection process should not be to
attract a vast pool of people, but to carefully select the right individuals for crisis
management roles. They argue that it is not only important to see if a person possesses
the right skills and mindset, but also whether the person would be willing to invest in
maintaining competences. As “people are obliged to keep up their own knowledge”, the
Police place a high importance on selecting motivated individuals. As such good
selection is seen as “the starting point for maintaining competences”. The emphasis on
selection as a step towards competence maintenance is also
apparent in the Fire Department as well as the GHOR
(Handleiding Blijvende Vakbekwaamheid, 2009; Handleiding
Onderwijsvisie AGOZ, 2011). Specifically, the learning principle in
the Handleiding Onderwijsvisie AGOZ (2011) from the GHOR
states that the individual is responsible for maintaining
competences as learning is an activity undertaken by the individual. For them,
possessing certain competences, skills or knowledge is not the only criteria for selection.
Instead, showing initiative for learning is also crucial as personal drive is an important
aspect of developing competences, skills or knowledge. Motivation to learn and to
perform in a crisis situation is a crucial trait of people to enhance the outcomes of
learning activities and it is worthwhile already selecting suitable candidates upon at an
early stage.
Also, in municipal crisis management the need to have motivated individuals has
received attention. Not only selecting motivated individuals is a way to achieve this.
During the interviews it became clear that it is also possible to trigger engagement in
developmental activities to a certain extend. A municipality secretary revealed that they
had trainings in for instance an amusement park. During this event, fun was combined
with learning activities. Initiatives like this could contribute to more interest among
municipality workers. The municipality secretary stated that if people are able to
combine fun with work, this may eventually lead to more people engaging in learning
activities.
Although it is not related to our objective on competence maintenance, we would like
to share some general remarks about the selection of municipal officers. Throughout
the 25 safety regions the process of selecting municipality officers for crisis roles differs
as there is no national, uniform approach on selecting officers for crisis duty. One
1. It is important
that the right
people are in the
right position.
28
municipality secretary, with a background as an Officer of Duty, stated that generally
applicants are assessed on a psychological basis to identify whether they possess
leader-, follower-, or advisor qualities. However, it seems that not all regions have the
possibility to comply with this process. It was argued by some interviewees that some
safety regions do not have enough applicants to appropriately select candidates based
on qualifications. Rather, the regions are satisfied if all the positions are filled. It appears
that there are two main contributing factors to this issue. First, it was stated that a role
as a crisis officer is not seen as a popular job. Second, crisis management is not the core
business of municipality officers.
Simulation Training
Another topic that was frequently addressed during the interviews was how formal
training can be approached. When discussing competences and how they can be
developed, a municipality secretary stated that there is a difference between knowledge
and skills. Knowledge can be obtained through reading and self-
study. Skills however can only be gained and further developed
through practice in simulations or real incidents. Since the
frequency of incidents can vary and not all crisis management
officers have the opportunities to regularly practice in real
incidents, exercising skills in simulations is essential. This
perception is also supported by the Police. An Environmental
Analyst from the Police stated that simulations can be very helpful
if they are able to replicate the stressful and dynamic settings of real incidents. In some
cases, individuals even forget that they are in an exercise and therefore gain very
valuable realistic experience. Simulations are especially valuable because they can
simulate a stress level of the crisis and thus prepare for a real situation. According to
one municipality secretary, being unaware of the reaction of an unexperienced officer
towards stress in an actual crisis incident is potentially dangerous because “they are of
no use anymore when they freeze”. Observing how someone deals with stress in the
setting of a simulation can be useful for two reasons. Firstly, the exercise can be
interrupted in order to investigate the cause of the reaction. Secondly, it is possible to
take appropriate steps to deal with the ‘frozen’ person in advance to the actual crisis
situation. In such cases, the Police have introduced a three-strike policy that results in
the removal of the officer from his crisis role.
One of the biggest advantages of simulation training is the routinization of tasks. It was
stated that during stressful situations, it is important to function according to
2. Simulations
are an effective
tool to maintain
and further
develop
competences.
29
predetermined steps and procedures. Whilst the unpredictability of crises always
requires some improvisation, it is important to adhere to predetermined steps as they
provide clear expectations for everyone involved. An officer who has developed a
routine for crisis incidents will fall into these routines and be less affected by stress.
Nonetheless, there are some drawbacks to simulation trainings. Firstly, it was also stated
that some individuals do not perceive the stress level in an exercise similar to that in an
actual crisis incident. Consequently, training can never fully replace real experience.
Secondly, simulation training is rather expensive, especially when more rescue services
are involved. Lastly, simulation exercises are very time consuming. Since crisis officers
from the municipalities have different jobs next to their crisis role, it is essential to find
the balance between too much and not enough exercising. Suggestions on frequency
for simulations range from once or twice a year to once every three years.
Periodic Assessment
When analyzing strategies to maintain competences, it is first of all important to identify
whether maintaining competences is sufficient or whether further development is
needed. It became clear via the interviews that it is important to assess crisis officers on
their level of competence. This assessment should not stop with
the final exam, but should be expanded to periodic assessments
throughout the tenure of a crisis management officer. A
representative from the GHOR stated that it is important to
assess regularly whether a crisis management officer is still
competent. Suggestions on frequency range from one to five
times a year. This assessment could for example be achieved through the means of e-
learning. In line with that, the Police have already yearly assessments on the
competences of their officers. Those who do not pass the ‘evaluation scans’ are re-
assigned as a consequence. Furthermore, in the Handleiding Vakbekwaamheid
Brandweerpersoneel (2009) it is stated that the Fire Department also uses a competence
portfolio system and implements periodic assessments of their personnel.
Many of the approaches described above could also contribute to the general level of
competences for the municipality officers. A municipality secretary stated that there is
already an e-learning program that could be altered to incorporate such an assessment.
He believes that the administration of such a tool should be handled on a national level
through IFV or a similar organization to ensure a coherent execution.
Once it has been identified how competent people are, it can then be assessed how
many hours of training or exercises a crisis manager needs to remain competent and
3. Competences
should be
assessed
periodically.
30
prepared. In some regions a system has been designed for that. There are also regions
that have appointed commissions to check if the trainings are enough to be qualified
for a crisis situation. Moreover, the Police started to use peer-review on a team level as
an assessment tool. The results of the peer-review evaluations are used to design the
education/training policy plans for those officers who need to further develop their
competences. Thus, the specific learning needs of the officers can be incorporated into
the design of the training. This is important as for instance a representative from the
GHOR acknowledged that people have different learning styles and in order to be more
effective, educational activities need to be designed with different learning needs in
mind. If these learning needs are responding to the individual level, then competence
based activities are advisable. Likewise, if learning needs exist on a team level then
learning activities should also be designed in a team setting.
Reflection, Feedback and Evaluation
Throughout all interviews, the value of reflection, feedback and
evaluation for continuous learning has become evident. Hence, it
comes as no surprise that all contributing parties described at
least one form of reflection or evaluation they are using or would
like to implement. Most common is the approach of reflection
and incident evaluation on the team level. However, some regions
of the Police decided to also reflect on individual performance
and competence.
For the GHOR, reflection is incorporated in their handbook. In the Handleiding
Onderwijsvisie AGOZ (2011) it is stated that having reflections enhances the ability to
learn and perform. Moreover, receiving concrete and constructive feedback is an
important aspect in the process of reflection. To aid in this process the Academie voor
GHOR en Opgeschaalde Zorg facilitates peer-to-peer coaching sessions which train the
participants in giving better feedback and in reflecting on received feedback.
In addition, the Fire Department has included the elements of self-knowledge and self-
reflection as parts of the concept of life-long learning in their Handleiding
Vakbekwaamheid Brandweerpersoneel (2009). One way to achieve self-knowledge and
self-reflection is through 360˚ feedback, also known as multi-rater feedback. This implies
to not only ask peers for feedback but also people from lower and higher hierarchical
levels. It also includes a self-evaluation. Moreover, the Fire Department utilizes the
STARR method for means of reflection which can provide a good overview of individual
as well as team competences. The STARR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result,
4. Reflection,
Feedback and
Evaluation play a
crucial role in the
learning process.
31
Reflection) looks at a specific situation to assess how a person handled it, what the
result was, whether it was effective and what could be improved in the future. Specific
learning needs might therefore arise from analyzing situations with the help of the
STARR method. Besides reflecting and evaluating on a technical level, it was also
suggested through the representative of the Fire Department to consider the emotional
aftermath of working in the crisis context. She gave the examples of the Environmental
Analyst who might be exposed to horrible graphic images, as well as the Officer of Duty
who is on site of the incident. Nevertheless, so far the emotional and psychological level
is mainly left unregarded.
Knowledge Maintenance
Representatives of the GHOR, V&R Academie and the Police all addressed the
importance of maintaining a proficient knowledge base. This means that crisis
management officers need to be up to date on all key
knowledge factors such as developments in the field,
literature, laws and technologies. Being up to date with all
the important information is crucial for performance and
maintaining a general level of competences as it combats
knowledge deterioration. One example of why this is so
important can be observed with the Officer of Duty. During
a crisis it was seen that an Officer of Duty experienced knowledge deterioration as a
result of frequent procedural changes. Specifically, the leader knew about a certain
relevant procedure but did not know how to implement it. Thus, it is important to
ensure that the competence of trained municipality officers is not lost due to a lack of
knowledge maintenance. Our interview partners argued that a solution could be to
provide additional training on knowledge of processes as well as methods to stay up to
date. The key objective would be two-folded. One the one hand, such training provides
information on where the knowledge can be found while on the other hand, it also
creates awareness of why it is important to consult these sources regularly.
Further Training on Specific Competences
In order to stay sufficiently prepared, a sufficient level of knowledge is not enough. To
maintain skills, further training on specific competences is needed. A representative of
V&R Academie suggests that there should be master classes which can serve as
refreshers and expand the level of the competence. These classes would single out
5. Crisis management
officers need to
update their
knowledge base
regularly.
32
specific processes that have to be followed or tasks that have to be fulfilled during a
crisis and zoom in on the specific competences needed for that. An example would be a
master class about the further development of leadership skills.
Additionally, a representative of the GHOR believes that
there should be multiple levels of training implying additional
training for the competences on an advanced level. In her
opinion there is a step missing between what is trained
during the official initial training initiated by IFV and the
follow-up activities of the regions. For specific competences,
IFV should offer further trainings to deepen and extend the competence. This would aid
in providing more tailor made trainings that truly cover the needs of the officers.
Consequently, the needed competences can be developed and it can be ensured that
already acquired competences are maintained. However, it is important to consider
whether such trainings would be necessary for all officers in a municipality or region.
Evaluation of Training and Exercises
With respect to the trainings in the GHOR, there seem to be some issues with the
evaluation of training effectiveness. The Handleiding
Onderwijsvisie AGOZ (2011) includes an evaluation of the
training process (how were learning goals achieved) and of
the product (to what extent do the results satisfy the
previously developed criteria) as a last step in the learning
activity. However, merely asking participants whether they
found the training useful is not seen as being substantial
enough to truly evaluate the training. It is more important to assess whether the
trainings effectively develop the needed competences of the officers. Guiding questions
could be: Does the training add value to their performance, and what is needed to
expand the competences and maintain them once the individual has reached a
proficient level? Especially the representative of the Police Academy stressed the
importance of training and solid evaluations. Thus, it is important to consider if the
evaluation method of the current trainings is enough.
6. Specific
competences can be
addressed through
in-depth trainings.
7. Training and
exercise evaluation
techniques should
be assessed on a
continuous basis.
33
Regional Cooperation and Knowledge Exchange
Many interviewees believe that there are potential gains from close inter-regional
cooperation. In terms of maintaining competences such cooperation offers many
opportunities to share knowledge and experience between regions to increase learning.
Additionally, cooperation is important as crisis incidents do not stop at the borders of
the municipality and/or safety region as was shown by for instance the Moerdijk 1
incident. Thus, it is important that neighboring regions are capable of working together.
The level of cooperation between safety regions
differs throughout the Netherlands. In some cases,
regions work closely together and extensively share
knowledge whilst others are rather disconnected. One
example of cooperation between regions can be
observed in the South of Holland as different regions
train and practice together. Moreover, these regions exchange scenarios and learn from
each other’s experiences. However, as this happens on a voluntary basis, many
opportunities of meaningful knowledge exchanges might be missed. Another example
was mentioned from the crisis communication (including Environmental Analysts) in
Gelderland-Zuid. A trip to a hospital in Nijmegen did not only expand the network of
the municipality officers, but also fostered knowledge exchange. This trip was combined
with knowledge on current issues such as Ebola. During these trips participants could
not only exchange information and evaluate the events but also learn from it by asking
questions about specific behaviors. Participation rates for the trip were high which
implies a positive attitude towards such activities.
When asking how knowledge exchange can be facilitated, a municipality secretary told
us about a seminar that is hosted by safety regions which rotates in turns. He suggested
that such seminars could be organized in cooperation with IFV and could take place
more frequently. IFV could contribute knowledge to those seminars while the safety
regions could share their experiences. Next to such formal seminars, it was also
suggested that regions with low incident frequency could use incidents experienced in
other regions to learn from their performance. One way this could be facilitated is
through e-learning.
Furthermore, it was suggested that officers from one region or municipality could
volunteer to help colleagues in neighboring territories. This could be valuable as one of
the additional information sources from the field concluded that regions feel the need
for support of other regions in terms of knowledge and capacity in times of crisis.
Respondents especially expect a need for advice during the warm phase, so during an
8. Cooperation and
knowledge exchange
between safety regions are
valuable for social learning.
34
actual crisis. Knowledge transfer between regions or from a central institute is especially
relevant for specific crisis situations which do not occur frequently.
Cooperation between Municipalities and Rescue Services
Both representatives from the Police and Fire Department have expressed the need for
more cooperation between the municipalities and the rescue services. There are several
reasons why this is important. Firstly, there are
multidisciplinary trainings and exercises involving both
municipalities and the rescue services. These are
valuable because practicing together is a way to
maintain and improve competence. However, it was
expressed that the quantity of such trainings is too low
and thus it would be valuable to have more
opportunities to practice together.
There are also other reasons that support the need for closer cooperation that are not
directly related to maintaining competences. One reason is that it was described that a
majority of municipality officers were excluded from the communication chain during a
crisis because they did not have ‘portophones’. These phones are used for crisis
communication between the rescue services. Ultimately, this results in a lack of
information for municipal officers such as the Officer of Duty. Secondly, there is a lack of
understanding in the true value of municipality officers as perceived by the rescue
services. Thus, it is important for all rescue services and municipalities to understand
why the work of others is important. This can be comprehended easier if cooperation
takes place more extensively.
Last but not least, it was argued that cooperation and practicing together improves the
network which is crucial during crisis situations. The representative of the Police
Academy stated, “it is a principle of knowing people and people knowing you. You
know what the other persons can bring to the table, which really works out when there
is a crisis”. Therefore, it is suggested that there should be more training that involves all
relevant actors.
Crisis Mindset on a Daily Basis
Many municipal crisis management officers do not work in crisis related fields in their
regular job. It was argued during the interviews that although some competences
necessary for crisis management, for example political insights, could be practiced
9. Cooperation and
knowledge exchange
between municipalities and
rescue services are
valuable for social learning.
35
during the daily job, others such as performing under stress are not possible to practice.
The consequent lack of overlap for many officers has the potential to increase the
deterioration rate of such skills. It is thus valuable for
maintaining competences to have certain overlap between
the skills used in the daily job and those of the crisis
situation. Therefore, it was suggested that it is necessary,
especially when incident experience and frequency is low,
to create overlap where possible. Informal learning is of high relevance here. It can be
achieved through actively monitoring crises in other municipalities or regions and
assessing them. This can be done on both an individual level as well as on a team level.
Firstly, an individual can look at incidents to see what was done by others in the same
role and compare that to the actions he or she would have chosen. Secondly, this can
be done together with others, to gather more insights on the matter and facilitate the
exchange of knowledge. Thus, it is important to either try and integrate crises as much
as possible in the daily job, or frequently reflect on incidents in other locations.
Additionally, it is important to get as much crisis experience in the daily routine as
possible, because “one generally does not do things well if one does not do them
frequently.” On a smaller scale it was suggested that taking five minutes per month to
read an article about crisis would already help in staying competent.
E-Learning
Throughout the previous takeaways, the suggestion of using
e-learning or apps has been widely spread. Currently, some
regions have been working on developing such tools or have
already introduced them. Using such tools can provide
numerous opportunities for maintaining competences of crisis
management officers. They can be used for sharing and
collecting knowledge, exercising and learning. An implicit message was that it could aid
in bridging the gap between daily job and the crisis role.
An Approach to Maintaining Competences
Throughout our interviews, several opinions were raised on how a system for
maintaining competences should be designed. A representative of the GHOR criticized
the lack of national standard for activities to maintain competences. She argued that it
11. E-Learning can
be a tool for
continuous learning.
10. It is important to
keep a crisis mind set
on a daily basis.
36
leads to less effectiveness. A more standardized approach would ensure that all officers
throughout the regions are on the same level of competence and preparedness.
Additionally, a representative of the GHOR expressed that every region needs a vision
on their desired level of proficiency. Specifically, they need to know how competent
their officers need to be. The argumentation behind this is that it might not be
necessary to get every officer on an expert level. Deciding on who needs to be at what
level, might improve the allocation of resources. This has been already been done by
some regions within the GHOR. They have developed a qualification file in which the
applicable core duties, competences, choices and dilemmas and performance criteria
are established after which a standard of proficiency is set. All consequent OTO-
activities are focused on obtaining and maintaining this standard of proficiency.
A third perception relevant to the approach of a system
to maintain competences refers to its design. A
municipality secretary stated that any vision on
maintaining competences needs to be developed
together with the regions. Similarly to the GROOTER
project, any vision for the regions needs to involve the
regions in order for it to be accepted. Moreover, a
different municipality secretary suggested that any
changes to the system should be approached through
organic growth. This means that the system should not be changed all at once, but by
gradually adding new elements and building one building block at a time.
At this stage it is important to state that a municipality secretary as well as an
educational officer expressed a perceived issue with regard to the number of officers
being trained. On the one hand, a mismatch between people who would like to take the
official training and exam and opportunities to do so seems to exist. It was described
that there is shortage of examiners due to the high demand for training and exams. On
the other hand, in at least one region there have been too many individuals trained for
the crisis roles and it is difficult to provide follow-up training for all. The region is
currently trying to reverse the problem by creating smaller teams of crisis managers that
can be trained intensively. The amount of people that need to be trained and also the
level on what they should be trained is again something to be considered when
designing a vision.
12. A system for
maintaining
competences needs to
be standardized,
designed together with
the regions and grow
organically.
37
From Pillar II we have learned that...
… selecting motivated individuals is important because maintaining competences is
an individual responsibility.
… formal learning in form of simulation is necessary to practice skills that cannot be
developed otherwise. Realistic simulations help to deal with stress as they increase
routinization.
…. an up-to-date knowledge base and a crisis mindset are needed to combat skill
deterioration and stay competent.
… regular periodic assessment is necessary to see whether it is sufficient to maintain
competences or whether further development is needed. Their results can be used
to design training that fits the individual learning needs.
…. reflection is valuable and should be used frequently as it enhances the ability to
learn.
… (multidisciplinary) cooperation between regions is valuable as it simulates
knowledge exchange and offers additional opportunities for practice.
… an approach to maintaining competences should be standardized for all safety
regions.
38
6 Pillar III – Inputs of the Municipal Crisis Management Officers
In this section, we provide information from the third pillar. Pillar III addresses the
specific objective of gathering insights from the crisis management officers themselves.
We give an overview of the learning needs the officers have as well as we present their
suggestions for continuous learning. After we include the selection of participants, the
procedure, the design and the way we analyzed the interviews, we present our results
summarized by the main takeaways.
6.1 The Method
Participants
To identify the learning needs of municipal crisis management officers with regard to
maintaining competences, we interviewed twelve municipality officers. Being well aware
of the diversity of safety regions, we gathered data about the safety regions to identify a
suitable sample of regions. Regions were selected based on high and low scores on the
following categories.
1. Number of GRIP Incidents in the Past. This provides a possible indicator for the
awareness of importance of maintaining competences (Van Duin & Wijkhuijs,
2015).
2. Regional Risk Profiles. The risk profiles provide information about the types of
crises likely to occur in this region and also about the likelihood that a crisis
occurs. Different types of crises require different ways of functioning and are also
related to a different attitude towards the occurrence of a crisis (for instance high
impact, low likelihood risk profiles).
3. Location of Region. The location can indicate the amount of coordination
needed between municipalities, cross-country and across borders.
4. Tenure. Participants who differ in the tenure of their role have different level of
experiences and thus might differ in their feeling of preparedness and need for
further development.
5. Frequency of Crisis. Participants with more crisis experience might perceive the
need to maintain competences differently.
39
Based on these criteria we initially
selected five regions that were
distributed equally throughout the
Netherlands. Due to reasons such as
availability we were not able to get in
contact with officers from all our regions
of first choice. Nevertheless, the final
selection of safety regions still fit the
criteria above. Figure 6 provides a visual
presentation of the geographical
position of these safety regions, namely
safety region Brabant-Noord,
Gelderland-Zuid, Midden- en West
Brabant, Utrecht, Zeeland, Zuid-
Holland-Zuid, and Zuid-Limburg. The
argumentation for the selection of
safety regions is more extensively
discussed in table 2 found in Appendix II.
The distribution of participants of the different roles was Officer of Duty (n=3), General
Commander (n=5) and Environmental Analyst (n=4). For an overview of tenure, gender,
crisis experience and initial training of the interviewees, please see table 3 in Appendix
II. We approached several officers for the interviews and aimed to interview twelve to
fifteen persons. In the end, we were able to talk to twelve officers and therefore reached
our initial target.
We believe that the awareness towards the significance of their role as crisis officers
could have played a role in their willingness to participate in our interviews. This issue
will be revisited in the conclusion of this report.
Procedure
We approached the participants via telephone and e-mail and collected the data via
twelve in-depth interviews during the project period. Nine were conducted via Skype,
one face to face and two via telephone. We perceived no difference between
conducting an interview via skype and face-to-face. Thus, this method allowed us to
interview more people in a relatively short period of time. Prior to the interview, we
asked the participants to sign a consent form for a recording of the interview and agree
Figure 6: Geographical Location of Selected Safety
Regions (Ministry of Security and Justice, 2010)
40
to the use of anonymized quotes. Furthermore, eight participants preferred to do the
interview in Dutch. The remaining five interviews were conducted in English.
Design
The questionnaire used during the interviews was designed on the basis of a topic list,
which was based on literature research. The main aim of the questionnaire was to
uncover the learning needs of the officers as well as to gather their suggestions for
learning. Competences, skills and knowledge that are needed to deal with the ever-
changing environment of crises change constantly. Therefore, learning cannot stop after
the initial training. This is why we include all different facets of continuous learning,
knowing the initial training, the current experience and the follow-up training and/or
the reflection as main core themes. We refer to table 4 in Appendix II for the topic list,
including the main core themes and the design. The questionnaire is semi-structured
and presented in Appendix III. The use of semi-structured interviews is justified on the
basis of the benefits that it offers (Louise Barriball & While, 1994). Especially in light of
the limitations of time and participant availability the method of in depth semi-
structured interviews provides a multitude of merits comported to similar data
collection methods such as surveys. Firstly, it has the benefit of eliminating the risk of
poor response rate one might expect from questionnaire surveys (Austin, 1981).
Secondly, semi-structured interviews provide the potential for “exploration of attitudes,
values, beliefs and motives” (Richardson, Dohrenwend & Klein, 1965; Smith, 1975: as
cited by Barriball & While, 1994). Thirdly, personal interviews have the added benefit of
giving further insight into the answers given through observing non-verbal indicators
(Gordon, 1975). Fourthly, it is ensured that each participant answers the same amount of
questions (Bailey, 1987). Based on these facts we believe that our approach was the
most promising method to collect value-adding data for the purposes of this project.
Analysis
Several steps were necessary for the analysis of the interviews. We conducted the
interviews with two persons while a third person took notes. This prevented bias with
regard to interpretation of the results and ensured that all relevant questions could be
asked. In the next step, we summarized the interviews. We used the audio recording as
a backup for information and to extract quotes for the report. The next step was to
create a coding scheme on the basis of the summary scheme and the topic list. All
group members revised the coding scheme to control for correctness. The goal was to
develop a conceptual framework to create an overview in the data. In the last step, we
41
examined the integration and connections between labels and core themes via selective
encoding. By doing so, it became clear which labels and core themes were recurrent in
the interviews and the learning needs could be identified. We present an example of a
completed coding scheme in table 5 in Appendix IV.
6.2 Takeaways from the Municipal Crisis Management Officers
On the basis of the literature research and the topic list, four core themes were
determined, which are the Job in General (daily job and job during crisis), Preparedness,
Learning Needs and General Opinion about Maintaining Competences. The scoring of
the labels on the different core themes is discussed in the following paragraphs.
Anonymous quotes are used to illustrate the data.
Job in General (Daily Job and Job during Crisis)
We started each interview with general questions regarding daily occupation, role in
crisis, tenure, if the participant had initial training and completed the exam and finally,
how many incidents he/she experienced. The purpose of these questions was twofold.
First, this way important, practical information was gathered. Second, by starting the
interview rather broad and talking about general issues, the interviewee was found to
be more relaxed.
Skills and Knowledge Needed in Crisis
In terms of skills, the following three main skills were
recurrent in the interviews with EA’s, GC’s and OoD’s: (1)
stress resistance, (2) teamwork and (3) communication
(including political skills). In terms of knowledge,
especially the OoD’s state that it is important to have a
good understanding of how your municipality/city hall
and region work, regarding content of work and structure.
Additionally, all three roles state that you need to have a
comprehensive understanding of how the other rescue services operate: “If you know
the surroundings well you can operate very easily”.
1. Stress resistance,
team work and
communication, and
knowledge about
structures are important
in crisis situations.
42
Overlap in Terms of Skills and Knowledge
Four EA’s stated that there is a big overlap in the skills
needed for crisis situations and their daily job: “Anticipating
on what could happen and adjusting activities to it is
basically the same for my daily job and my crisis role.” Four
GC’s also have a managing function in their daily job, which
corresponds to the skills needed as GC: “giving people space
and direction is something which is applicable in both
situations” and “someone who leads a department or bureau in the daily job is
someone who can consequently also more easily move within the management role of
the ROT.” One GC stated that there is overlap on a knowledge level, but regarding skills
there is not much overlap. Two OoD’s stated that there is not much overlap of skills
needed in their daily job and the skills needed in crisis situations. Altogether, a certain
extent of overlap exists for many of the officers.
Preparedness
When investigating learning needs on maintaining competences, it is important to
consider continuous learning as a whole in terms of before, during and after the
maintaining activity. Therefore, the core theme ‘preparedness’ refers to a general feeling
of preparedness, initial training, crisis experience, stress level experience and skill
deterioration.
General Feeling of Preparedness
During our interviews, all twelve participants stated that they
felt prepared for a possible crisis situation. Four Environmental
Analysts argued that due to the big overlap between the daily
job and the crisis role, they have the opportunity to practice
their crisis role more often which supports in the feeling of
preparedness. Five General Commanders and three Officers of
Duty stated that the initial training and the experiences with
crisis supported in the general feeling of preparedness. Additionally, in accordance with
two General Commanders and one Officer of Duty, all four Environmental Analysts
stated that although they feel prepared for a possible crisis situation, “it is never
enough”. They stated that municipality officers should always focus on improving their
2. For some officers,
an overlap between
tasks in crisis role and
tasks in the daily job
exists.
3. Initial training
and crisis experience
support in creating a
feeling of
preparedness.
43
skills and keep up with developments in the field in order to keep that feeling of
preparedness.
Training4
Two OoD’s argued that the training helped them in “learning the basic structure of what
to do if your pager is going off”. One of the OoD’s stated that even though you
sometimes have to improvise in crisis situations; knowing a set structure will help you in
logical reasoning and basing your actions on solid argumentation. She therefore used
the training solely as an opportunity to exchange knowledge and to get to know people
out of the field, as she already obtained the needed skills in former education. In
accordance with this statement, one OoD and one GC argued that there should be
different levels of training in order to accommodate different experience levels, as not
everyone starts at the same point: “For the ones that were new it was probably
absolutely of added value. However, not that much for me.”
Three out of four EA’s state that they were not fully satisfied
with the training they received. One EA did not take the initial
training. Representing the opinions of the EA’s that took the
initial training, one EA state that the training is more of a
checklist: “did you press this button, did you check this? I
would like to have a focus on the reasoning behind choices:
why did you make the choices you did?’’ Another EA states:
“we really don’t do it that way in our region. So my personal opinion is that these
trainings are not adequately professionalized yet and specified to the region”. While
these insights mainly relate to already outdated trainings, this still presents a valuable
point for the learning needs of the officers. So far, they do not feel that the initial formal
training has met their needs. Additionally, two of the GC’s stated that the training can
be seen ”as a basis, but you need to deepen it, this was mainly theory” and therefore “if
I would have had only training, it did not prepare me adequately”.
4 Some officers have participated in an initial training before the qualification profiles and thus
corresponding trainings were designed. Hence, not every officer has participated in a training facilitated
by IFV but within their municipality and/or region.
4. The effects of
the initial training
are limited to
building a basis of
preparedness.
44
Crisis experience
Ten out of twelve participants stated that there is a rather
low frequency of incidents in their region/municipality and
therefore they do not experience crises often. However,
due to the fact that they have been in this position for a
longer amount of time, they did gather a lot of crisis
experience over time. In addition to the low frequency of
incidents, some participants state that there is a large pool
of people who can have on-call, so “if you’re unlucky, you will never experience a crisis”.
Others state that due to the small, select group of people in their region, they have
more on-call-duties and thereby, more chances of experiencing a crisis. Additionally, all
participants believe that “experience helps to supplement preparedness in combination
with trainings and exercises”.
Stress Level Experience
The opinions regarding training the competence ‘dealing with stress’ are divided. Some
officers state that formal training and education do not help
you to develop focus and experience in stressful situations.
Others stated that the simulations did help in creating a
realistic, stressful environment and that stress is definitely
something that needs to be trained on. Regardless of
training this competence, all twelve officers state that the
increased stress level does not have a negative influence on
the effectiveness of their functioning in crisis situations.
Some attribute this to their experience and some to their personal characteristics. “I
already experience stress in my daily job”, “I have had lots of experience in crisis
situations” and “it is not in my character to be stressed”.
Skill Deterioration
In the interviews, all officers state that their skills are
not deteriorating, due to the big overlap of skills in
their daily job and the crisis role and the experiences
with crisis situations. However, there are still concerns.
Half of the EA’s state that they need to maintain a
sharp focus on this topic as there are many
7. Experience and overlap
between daily role and crisis
role can compensate for
skill deterioration.
6. Crisis experiences
and personal
characteristics
determine how stress
is experienced in a
crisis situation.
5. Crisis experience
supplements training in
regard to perceived
preparedness.
45
developments in the field, for instance related to social media: “Are the things how I do
my job still up to date? We have been doing stuff in this way for a long time, but is it
still the right way?” When there is regular practice, two third of the OoD’s believe it is
not possible to have skill deterioration. Two of the GC’s state that although in their
safety regions incidents happen rather frequently, due to the switch of on-call-duty,
there is still a big time lag between the incidents. One GC who has had the role since
five months still feels prepared, but is afraid his skills will deteriorate if there is no
follow-up training: “Take a look at the EHBO exam, that diploma is out of date after two
years. My diploma of General Commander will never be out of date.”
Learning Needs
The core theme ‘learning needs’ refers to what kind of activities the officers are currently
undertaking to maintain the competences. It also related to the vision on how
competences should be maintained. Also, it is related to the questions if there is
reflection after crisis incidents, the possibility of informal learning and if there is
cooperation between and within safety regions/municipalities. As such, it is a central
theme in developing a strategy for maintaining competences of municipal crisis
management officers.
Current Maintenance Activities
The participants differ in the frequency and time they spend
on maintaining their competences. Nine interviewees state
that they undertake maintenance activities, such as
participating in formal (multidisciplinary) trainings each year
and/or go to knowledge-exchange dates. Frequency varies
but an average is one to three times per year. One GC is
considered an exception, as he also has other crisis roles and
thus, participates in training around ten times a year. Three
officers state that they do not maintain their competences in a formal way as there is
nothing organized and/or there is no need for training due to the overlap of skills or a
high frequency of crises. One EA states he does not have any official activities but does
try to learn for himself by practicing doing analyses at home when there is a crisis in
another region.
8. There are large
differences between
safety regions with
regards to activities
for maintaining
competences.
46
The Dream: Vision on Maintaining Competences
Many statements were made regarding the vision of the municipality officers on what
they felt that there could be done to maintain competences. One of the most recurrent
statements was the wish to have multi-disciplinary
trainings with other municipal roles and the rescue
services (half of the participants). The officers feel this
would support them in expanding their network and
officers will already come to know the people they will
work with in the warm phase (one third of the
participant). This would in turn have a positive influence
on dealing with the crisis effectively. Also, four officers
stated that there is “a sort of awareness of the crisis role”,
but colleagues still do not have a “solid understanding of what a crisis role exactly
entails”. This implies that the perspective on crisis management needs to change from
“something that must be done” to “it is of vital importance to give attention to these
topics”. If the perspective would change, officers feel it would be easier to incorporate
more time for the crisis role in their daily job. Furthermore, four officers state that the
follow-up training or knowledge exchange days should be made obligatory. Those
follow-up trainings could be adapted to the different risk profiles of safety regions and
to the different levels of proficiency of the municipality officers. At this moment, people
who do not have any experience are in the same course as people who already have a
lot experience. Four officers feel that this keeps the training on “a basic, too general
level” and is therefore “not enough to be prepared for a crisis situation”.
Reflection
A distinction can be made by reflecting on the actions
during the crisis on a technical level (for instance: How did
the incident go? Was everybody on time?) and on an
emotional level (What is the psychological aftermath of a
crisis?). Seven officers state that they have a technical
reflection, of which two state that they would also like to
have an ‘emotional reflection’. Many officers state that
reflection takes place after the incident and is guided by questions such as ‘what was
the impact? How do I feel?’. Some state that reflection takes place unconsciously, for
instance during the night. Furthermore, five officers state that they have reflections with
the safety council but also internal reflection within the region and/or municipality.
9. Maintaining
competences should
include obligatory
multidisciplinary trainings
(adapted to the level of
proficiency) and
networking possibilities.
10. Opportunities
for reflection are
valued by the crisis
management officers.
47
Topics which officers mention are peer colleague reviewing, learning from mistakes and
having regular evaluation meetings. Thereby, two participants noticed that the
evaluations are often conducted on an organizational level, while they would also like to
focus on the individual level: “This is not to point fingers, but it can help in seeing if
specific persons need more training and/or education”, which can help them improve
their level of proficiency.
Informal Learning
Eleven participants stated that informal learning, or ‘learning on the job’ is possible and
is something that should be used very often. This can be done via training yourself. All
three EA’s and one OoD stated that by looking at the news
“with your iPad on your lap”, you can study how other regions
are handling crises. “For example, you can make an analysis
yourself on your couch and see what the mayor is saying in the
press conference. This can serve as a check to see if you
looked for the right information”. Learning on the job can also
happen via talking to others at seminars and exchange
knowledge and experiences, and/or by talking to and observing colleagues. “You can
learn so much from looking at other municipalities and how they handled crisis
situations.” Furthermore, officers stated that if there is an overlap between the skills
needed during crisis and the daily job, there is also a potential for informal learning. E-
learning, or the use of an app is also seen as informal learning by two officers. Finally,
one officer says that informal learning might be valuable, but “a good crisis is the best
way to learn”.
Cooperation
Half of the participants stated that they are cooperating with other
municipalities/regions on a knowledge level, by exchanging knowledge on organized
seminars/workshops and/or in Whatsapp groups. Five
participants stated that they are cooperating with other
municipalities within the region and the different rescue
services in multidisciplinary trainings. Additionally, some
participants said that they give tips and tricks to less
experienced officers and/or give them the opportunity to
observer and hence, improve their skills and knowledge. In
contrast, one participant stated that they are not or barely
11. Many officers
see value in
informal and social
learning.
12. Cooperation
between different
municipalities/safety
regions is valued but
differs from region to
region.
48
cooperating with other municipalities/regions, as “other regions are at a really basic
level. I believe our region has more focus on up keeping competences”, and “every
municipality/region acts in a different way and it is therefore not possible to apply their
best practices to my municipality”.
6.2.4 General opinion about maintaining competences
The core theme ‘general opinion about maintaining competences’ refers to the amount
of time the municipality officers want to spend on maintaining competences, who they
feel has the responsibility for maintaining competences and to what extent they feel
supported by their municipality to maintain their competences.
Time
Five officers state that one to three trainings a
year is sufficient to upkeep your level of
proficiency, but only if you also have overlap in
your daily job with the skills you need in your crisis
role. Two persons stated that in addition to
training, 40-50 hours a year should be sufficient to maintain their competences. When
asked for their “dream” amount of time available for this purpose, two officers state one
day a week, one states 100 hours per year and one two days per week. They all agreed
though, that their wishes might not be realistic.
Responsibility
The participants are divided regarding the
questions of who should have the responsibility
for maintaining competences. Half of the
participants state that the responsibility should
lie with the individual, three people say it is the
responsibility of the safety region, one names
the municipality and two persons say that the
responsibility lies with all three.
13. There are differences in
the time desired to satisfy the
learning needs of the officers.
14. Responsibility for
maintaining competences should
lie with the individual and be
supported by the safety region
and municipality.
49
Support Municipality
Seven out of twelve participants feel supported by their municipality to maintain their
competences, as they are able to make time in their schedule for for instance
trainings/seminars. In contrast, five participants state that they do not feel supported by
their municipality to upkeep their competences. One officer
stated that “last year we did not even have time to participate
in the training, so no one went. Willingness is not the
problem. People are willing. They simply do not have the
time”. Those officers state that the municipality should reserve
more time in their schedule to maintain their competences,
however this is challenge: “Well, there is some understanding,
but still a lot of my colleagues do not know what I do and they have me rather working
on my daily job.” Another officer states that “sometimes you need a crisis to create the
awareness”.
15. The biggest
obstacle is lacking
time and support
for maintaining
competences.
50
… some municipal officers perceive an overlap between the skills and
knowledge needed in their regular job and those needed during crisis.
… while the officers we interviewed feel prepared, they agree that it is still
crucial to constantly update and improve their competence.
… an initial training can help to build the basis for preparedness. Real
competence though can only be gained through application and
experience.
… while stress is always apparent during crisis, the officers we interviewed
think that practice, experience or even personal characteristics can help to
deal with it.
… the maintenance activities currently undertaken differ a lot between
safety regions.
… the learning needs of the officers differ. They would like learning
activities to be tailored to their specific level of proficiency.
From Pillar III we have learned that...
51
Figure 7: Summary of the Temple Structure
7 Bringing Together The Three Perspectives – Ingredients For A Vision
Whereas the previous sections purely described the information we gathered, we now
turn to addressing the overall objective of this project: to provide an overview of
strategies to facilitate continuous learning of municipal crisis management officers for
staying prepared for crisis situations. We are doing this in a twofold way. In the first
step, we identify common themes throughout the three pillars and subsequently the
ingredients for a vision on maintaining competences. In the second step, we provide a
palette of concrete recommendations on how our suggestions can be approached.
Together these two steps provide the conceptual basis for the future vision of IFV on
maintaining competences. Our line of argumentation is visualized in Figure 7 below.
52
7.1 Towards a Vision on Maintaining Competences
To start with the first step, we now provide our suggestions for ingredients for IFV’s
vision on the basis of the three pillars.
The Need to Maintain Competences of Municipal Crisis Management Officers
Our research has revealed ample evidence for the need to maintain competences. The
academic perspective has shown that skills that are not used on a regular basis will
become obsolete over time. This finding has also been supported by our field research.
Municipal crisis management officers that have a lot of opportunity to apply their skills
regularly, feel better prepared than those that get less experience. Also, if they would
not have an opportunity to practice, they would expect to lose their skills and
knowledge. This supports the need to maintain competences by taking actions to
prevent such deterioration. However, before any actions for maintenance are taken, it
needs to be determined what level of proficiency is aimed at. The question should be
raised which level equals competence to handle crisis effectively for each municipality.
Once this has been clarified, further actions can be designed accordingly.
In the following, we discuss how these matters can be addressed and what needs to be
taken into account when crafting a vision. Our main proposal how competences can be
maintained is through designing a system of continuous learning. Before we explain this
proposal in more detail, we first discuss the overall important ingredients.
Bottom-Up Instead of Top-Down
One element that needs to be considered is the approach of how a continuous learning
system itself is designed. Our research revealed that many of the safety regions (out of
the sample we interviewed) are already aware of the general need to maintain and
further develop the competences of their crisis management officers. It also became
apparent that while maintaining competences takes place, the frequency and the
activities differ among the regions. To ensure that everyone in the Netherlands is
prepared sufficiently, a more standardized approach should be taken. This approach
should be designed in cooperation with the safety regions and municipalities, as
involving the users of the system in the design of it will foster acceptance.
53
A Special Context
Furthermore, when designing continuous learning activities, one has to be aware of the
target group and its specific needs. Findings from all three pillars suggest that this is
particularly relevant with regard to the specific context. The context of the regular job
differs from that in a crisis situation. Literature suggests that even if certain
competences are acquired in one context, these competences do not automatically
transfer to other contexts. This is supported in our interviews for instance in relation to
the difference in stress levels. If stress is added to the equation, people might behave
differently in comparison to a relaxed training atmosphere. This implies that the specific
context of crises should be taken into account when designing learning activities for the
municipal officers.
Consider Different Learning Needs
Next to the specific context, findings of Pillar II and Pillar III highlight the issue of the
diversity of learners. As it was stated by both representatives from the training provider
and municipal officers, there are large differences in terms of their learning needs. This
diversity is caused by several different factors. First of all, each officer has a different
background and a different regular job. Due to these differences, it is not possible to
make generalizations regarding the overlap between their regular and crisis role.
Additionally, their levels of proficiency in handling crises differs, which implies that one
uniform approach of continuous learning will not meet all of the different learning
needs. Instead of a static design, the system of continuous learning should be flexible
and adaptable to these needs.
To identify the different learning needs and to check on the general level of
preparedness, regular competence assessments should be conducted. Such
assessments do not only help to match the right learning activities to each individual
but they also provide an overview whether the right people are in the right position. As
it has been shown that people need to be motivated and need to take initiatives
themselves to maintain their competences, it is crucial that crisis management officers
possess such characteristics. Hence, when designing a vision on maintaining
competences, it is important to take the selection procedure into account. We believe
that certain criteria that determine the willingness to maintain competences on a
regular basis, should be used to identify suitable candidates for the specific roles.
54
Facilitating
role: IFV
Designing role:
safety region
Supporting and
monitoring
role:
municipality
Individual
responsibility
Shared Responsibility: The Individual, the Municipality, the Safety Region and IFV
A vision on maintaining competences should also include a clear indication of who
should be responsible for it. This has been mentioned implicitly as well as explicitly in all
three pillars. According to our research, the core responsibility lies with the individual. It
has been stressed by multiple interview partners that the crisis management officers
themselves need to take on the responsibility to maintain their competences, as well as
to further develop those competences. As such, motivated and engaged individuals
should be in the role of crisis officers in the first place. However, the municipal officer
should be given the opportunity to participate in training and education. Based on the
findings from our research, we suggest a core model which is presented in Figure 8. It
summarizes the distribution of responsibility based on the research of our project.
Based on our research, we conclude that the role of IFV could be to communicate the
vision of continuous learning to the safety regions. Additionally, IFV should then provide
the possible ingredients for a
continuous learning system. This
implies that IFV would be
responsible for the overall
coordination and guidance of any
learning activities and has therefore
a facilitating role. Possible ways to
reach this, is to inform the safety
regions about what training
opportunities and/or different
designs are available for the
different blocks. This refers for
instance to the different ways of
learning, namely formal, informal
and social learning. In terms of formal learning this implies that IFV connects the safety
regions with commercial training providers. Working together, the training providers
and safety regions are more able to identify the different learning needs within the
region and hence, develop a training which is tailor made.
With the support of IFV, the safety regions should provide the opportunity for
maintaining competences. This presents a shift from the municipal level to a regional
level. Instead of each municipality, each safety region should design a system of
continuous learning that regards the specific learning needs of the officers in their
region. In our research it became evident that many regions have adapted an
Figure 8: Distribution of Responsibility
55
interregional pool of municipal crisis management officers and also conduct learning
activities within this pool. This approach was considered to be more efficient and less
costly.
The new responsibility of the municipalities should focus on monitoring the learning
process and providing support by creating a learning environment that enables their
officers to self-develop. This is crucial because the lack of time to focus on maintaining
competences has been stated as the biggest obstacle to staying prepared for their role
of crisis management. This implies that additional time should be allocated to this task.
One part of that would be to instruct direct supervisors to allow and encourage learning
both at the regular job and outside of it.
A System for Continuous Learning
Keeping all the different elements in mind, we are now turning to the system of
continuous learning. To ensure a uniform approach, the vision should specify what
learning activities can be used to maintain competences. Naturally, staying prepared
starts with becoming prepared. The initial training forms the foundation of competence.
Insights from the municipal officers revealed however that only keeping up the level of
competence that was reached after an initial training is not sufficient to stay prepared
for crisis incidents. Instead, maintaining competences is a continuous process that
requires a systematic approach. Moreover, all three pillars revealed another reason why
a continuous learning system is necessary for staying prepared. Literature on crisis
management has shown that crisis situations are highly unpredictable and one crisis is
not like the other. Environmental changes and technological advancements contribute
to this unpredictability. As such officers should be required to constantly refresh their
skills and update their knowledge about the new developments to be prepared for
unpredictable situations at all times. To keep up and further enhance the level of
competence reached after the initial training, a never-ending cycle of continuous
learning has to follow. Literature suggests that such a cycle should include formal,
informal as well as social learning activities.
Support for such an approach was also found in Pillar II and III. Different suggestions
and wishes have been made regarding the three types of learning. Formal learning is
mostly seen as a starting point or an opportunity to refresh what was learned initially.
To support this, formal learning activities should be designed. An especially large value
was seen in activities that simulate real crisis incidents. In both Pillar II and Pillar III it was
furthermore stated that there is a potential to incorporate informal learning in the
continuous learning cycle. When considering the three crisis management roles in
56
question, it can be argued that there are differences in the potential for informal
learning. The largest potential for informal learning was perceived by the Environmental
Analysts as they have the largest overlap between their regular job and their role in
crisis management. Social learning activities are perceived valuable in all pillars as they
foster interaction and enables sharing of knowledge. A necessary antecedent is the
creation of an environment in which social learning takes place. Our research also
revealed that social learning is often a by-product of formal and informal learning
activities.
When designing this system of continuous learning, it is important to integrate all three
components. Only focusing on some of them separately will not lead to the same effect
as most of their value derives from the combination of all three components. Reflection
and e-learning can be valuable tools to support all three elements of continuous
learning. The element of reflection was reccurring in all three pillars. As the intense
pressure to function effectively does not allow for time to reflect during a crisis, it is
crucial to learn to engage in such activities afterwards. As such, it is necessary to provide
individuals with the opportunities and tools to reflect on situations or competences. This
way they can assess their behavior, the reasons for their behavior and ways to improve.
Additionally, Pillar II and III acknowledged the potential need or usefulness of e-learning
or apps.
In the next section we will discuss how the components of the system could look like.
57
7.2 Recommendations
After we have discussed the general ingredients for a vision, we now focus on the
system of continuous learning as a way to maintain competences. It is the aim of the
following recommendations to illustrate how this system could look like in practice.
Therefore, we identify a palette of options for each component. These options can then
be applied in accordance to the individual learning needs. For the recommendations,
we do not differentiate between the three different crisis management roles because
our research has shown that differences emerge rather from factors such as crisis
experience or overlap between the crisis and regular role and not as a result of the
different function.
It is important to note that before any actions can be taken to develop a system of
continuous learning, more research has to be conducted to confirm and strengthen our
recommendations. This is discussed in more detail in the last section of this report.
Recommendation 1: Simulating Reality – Formal Learning
As discussed in the previous section, a system of continuous learning should include
three different components. We now turn to the first one, which is formal learning. To
support and enable formal learning, we suggest two kinds of interventions which are
simulations and in-depth/follow-up trainings.
Simulations
Simulation can be a tool to create situations similar to reality. These can be designed
similar to the ones that are already initiated by IFV in cooperation with V&R Acadamie.
However, on the basis of our research we stress the importance to follow certain criteria.
- Realistic Design. The simulations should be as close to reality because only then
the officers will be prepared for a stressful situation (for instance under high time
pressure) and will be able to routinize appropriate behavior that they can
consequently more easily fall back to in a real crisis. This way, they will also have
knowledge of the existence and application of applicable processes. They will
have worked in a team setting, know the dynamics and perhaps have also been
able to build up a network.
58
- Multidisciplinary Set-Up. To create a situation that is as close to reality as
possible, a simulation exercise should not only include municipal crisis offers but
also other stakeholders relevant to crisis situations, for instance rescue services.
- Frequency. As it is important to practice regularly to avoid skill deterioration, the
frequency of the simulations should range between one to three times a year.
- Mandatory Participation. Linked to the previous point, it is important that the
offers participate in the simulations regularly. To ensure their presence, it could
be an option to make it obligatory to attend a certain amount of trainings a year.
- Evaluation. To enhance the learning experience of participants, a thorough
evaluation of the exercise should take place.
In-depth Follow-up Trainings
Next to simulations, another type of formal learning we consider relevant is in-depth
training. As the levels of proficiency differ between the crisis management officers, such
trainings can help to overcome individual deficits. The following guidelines can help to
set up such trainings.
- Individual Learning Needs. As a first step, the specific learning needs of the crisis
management officers should be assessed (see recommendation 6). Based on this
assessment, training contents and level of the training (‘beginner’ or ‘advanced’)
can be adapted. This would not only ensure a better fit of the training to the
learning needs but also avoid a waste resources (time and money).
- Core Competences. The most important skills needed for crisis management
have been identified as stress resistance, team work and communication
(including political skills). Furthermore possessing the knowledge about the
organizational structures has been emphasized multiple times. Therefore, in-
depth follow up trainings can be set up around these core skills and knowledge.
59
Recommendation 2: Learning at the Workplace – Informal Learning
The second type of learning that needs to be included in a continuous learning system
is informal learning. Even though informal learning cannot be forced, it can be
encouraged and nurtured in several ways. Concrete ideas are listed in the following.
Learning From Other Crisis Incidents
Sources for learning do not have to be limited to own experience in practice or
simulation. Instead, also incidents experienced by others can contribute to the learning
experience. Specifically, this can be achieved by following these suggestions.
- Observation. Crisis management officers can observe incidents that take place
elsewhere through the press or media and conduct an analysis or evaluation of
the incident by asking him/herself questions such as “What has been done?”,
“What would I have done?” and “What can I learn from that?”. IFV could
encourage all crisis management officers to actively scan the media for such
incidents.
- Practice Cases. Next to evaluating incidents found via the press, other practice
cases could be provided via e-learning or an App. This approach would have
several added benefits. First, it would allow IFV to choose which incidents to
provide. Second, IFV could frame these incidents in a more digestible layout and
thus reduce the time investment on the part of the officer. Third, IFV could
provide questions for each case and thus amplify the learning potential. Lastly,
IFV could monitor the progress of each crisis officer and provide additional
information and cases where needed.
Overlap – Learning During the Regular Job
Depending on the degree of overlap between daily job and crisis role, informal learning
can happen as a side effect of performing one’s daily tasks. While most of this happens
unconsciously, it can be facilitated through some concrete actions.
- Technology. There are several ways technology can be used to aid informal
learning. Based on our research, an e-learning tool which are set up and
administered centrally would add the most value in this case (for more details
see recommendation 5).
60
Recommendation 3: Learning From One Another – Social Learning
As it has been shown before that social learning is one valuable form of continuous
learning, several aspects should be considered to facilitate and trigger social learning.
Make Learning Activities (even) More Fun
It is necessary to create an open environment where people feel comfortable and
willing to share their knowledge as this is a crucial antecedent of social learning. One
way to do so is by organizing networking events which combine learning activities with
fun. The following guidelines can help to organize such events.
- Unconventional but Pleasant Destination. To create an atmosphere where people
feel comfortable and share knowledge, a learning experience can be designed
outside the classroom. This could for instance imply visiting a theme park or
organizing city walks in one of the safety regions. Participating in such activities
can trigger conversations beyond the scope of formal learning agendas and thus
trigger deeper knowledge exchange.
- Offer a Platform. IFV can take an active role in facilitating knowledge exchange
between crisis management officers through organizing seminars/conferences.
Guest speakers for relevant topics can provide information about newest trends
specific to the crisis role, for instance new technology that needs to be used by
Environmental Analysts. Contents of the seminar can then be discussed in small
groups which allows to exchange knowledge and learn from each other. Another
option can be to encourage the regions to organize rotating seminars. In this
format, IFV can contribute knowledge, while the regions contribute their
experiences.
Sharing Experience
As in all work environments, in crisis management there is a lot of diversity in the level
of proficiency and the amount of crisis experience of municipal crisis management
officers. This diversity should be utilized to learn from each other. Concrete steps to do
so can include the following.
- Mentor System. More experienced municipal crisis officers from one role can
share their expertise with less experienced crisis officers from the same role. Not
only can the less experienced learn from the more experienced. It can also work
vice versa. Questions or insights of both officers can add to the learning
experience. As such learning needs of both parties have to be shared. As crisis
61
experience is a crucial determinant in staying prepared, it can be valuable to
benefit from more experienced officers. IFV could facilitate this by aligning
mentors and mentees. As such a mentor database could be developed and
officers could be asked during the initial training whether they would like to
benefit from a mentor.
- Use Technology to Facilitate Contact. If a municipality is not equipped with
highly experienced officers, social communication channels can help to
overcome the distance issue. Discussing current crisis incidents via social media
can help to learn from each other but also to stay up to date.
- Assign “Piket-Partners” (on-call partners). Forming teams of officers with different
experience levels that are on call together can improve knowledge exchange and
contribute to social learning. The less experienced officer can observe, while to
more experienced ones can take the lead. If there are not enough officers from
the same municipality, regional teams can also be formed.
Cooperation and Knowledge Exchange Within and Between Regions
Sharing knowledge and best practices between municipalities within safety regions and
also beyond regional borders has been perceived as valuable for continuous learning.
As such several steps can be undertaken to facilitate this.
- Learn from Crises of Others. Especially significant crises incidents are evaluated
by the Dutch Council of Safety. A lot can be learned from this evaluation.
Therefore it should be considered for municipal officers to attend such meetings
at they can support in learning from each other’s best practices and mistakes.
- Train Together. Training in multidisciplinary and inter-regional teams can offer a
platform for knowledge exchange. Additionally, they can be beneficial to learn
about best practices. However, it needs to be taken into account that structures
are sometimes distinct for certain municipalities or regions and thus best
practices might not add the same value for each region. Municipal officers can
also observe and play a way-on role to get insights into the exercises of others.
62
Recommendation 4: Periodic Assessment
Periodic assessments provide insights in the current level of competence and whether it
is sufficient to simply maintain this or whether and on which competences an individual
needs to further develop. This leads to the statement that a periodic assessment
supports in determining the learning needs of the officers. There are several ways of
how a periodic assessment can take place.
- Incorporate in Activities. Periodic assessments can be incorporated into
different learning activities. On the basis of how effective an officer performs
in for example simulations in a follow-up training can support the evaluation
of the level of proficiency on those competences. The Police has a three-
times-strike out policy, which means that if an officer fails to perform on the
required level three times in a row, he will be assigned to another job within
the Police.
- Peer Colleague Reviewing. Peer colleague reviewing is an activity which is
used by the different rescue services and provides insight in the level of
proficiency of the officer. This can be done via face-to-face feedback
meetings with peers and leaders, or filling in an anonymous survey regarding
the level of proficiency on competences of colleagues. Another tool which
can support is a so-called ‘competence scan’, which is used by the Fire
Department. First, the officer needs to score his own level of proficiency on
different competences. Second, two other colleagues also fill in this
competence scan regarding the competences of their colleague. The officer
has then three competence scans which might have the same results or differ.
The results and different perspectives are discussed in a feedback meeting.
63
Recommendation 5: Stop and Look Back – Feedback, Reflection and Evaluation
Reflection can be a tool that helps to slow down and evaluate what went well and
where there is still room for improvement. Although, reflection itself is a highly cognitive
process, it can take place in various scenarios. General tips on reflection as well as
suggestions on three of these scenarios are outlined below.
Reflection in General
- An Atmosphere for Reflection. For reflection to be valuable, an open and
psychological safe (trustful) environment needs to be created. As reflecting
on mistakes during a crisis situation can have a significant emotional impact
on the officer, he needs to feel comfortable in dealing with such situations.
To create such an environment, feedback should be formulated in a
constructive way. Furthermore as it was stressed in our interviews, it needs to
be assured that blaming behavior is substituted by open conversation.
Reflection meetings should be designed in a way that officers can talk about
incidents rather than the question of “what went wrong?” has priority (also
see address the positive)
- Solidity Reflection. In case municipal officers do not feel comfortable enough
to share their experiences, they can also reflect on an individual basis. This
can take place for instance through journal writings or using learning guides.
Individual reflection is valuable as it helps to re-live the situation and engage
in it once more. Questions that come up during individual reflection can then
also be addressed in formal learning activities or discussed during social
learning processes.
- Address the Positive. Reflection should not only focus on areas of
improvement. Positive points should be addresses as well to upkeep
motivation.
Individual Reflection
Individuals reflect on an individual level either unconsciously or consciously. While
unconscious reflection cannot be easily influenced, there are several ways to facilitate
and trigger conscious reflection.
- 360° Feedback. To not only rely on one source of feedback, it can be useful
to consult a variety of people that experienced a person’s performance
during the crisis situation. These can for instance include colleagues from
64
higher or lower organizational levels or members from the rescue services.
360° feedback also includes a self-assessment. If needed, specific questions
on the required competences in crisis situations can be incorporated in this
process.
- STARR Method. It is important that individuals ask for concrete examples to
identify specific areas of improvement. This method is especially useful in
providing insights into the competences of oneself or of others. A useful tool
to design the reflection process as concrete as possible is the STARR
Method5.
- Help of Others. Seeking the help of someone more experienced or someone
who can facilitate the process of reflection can be useful to make use of
developmental experiences. Peer-to-peer coaching sessions can help here.
Team Reflection
While individual reflection mainly focuses on developing on an individual level, team
reflection can help develop new ideas by sharing different perspectives. There are
several tools that can help to reflect on a team level.
- Multidisciplinary Reflection. Reflection should also be done together with the
team that operated during the crisis. Individuals can share their best practices
and negative experiences to learn from each other and to increase their
knowledge. Questions to support this process are “what went well?” “Where
is room for improvement?”.
Guided Reflection/Evaluation – Learning Arenas
The goal of learning arenas is to provide an opportunity for reflection and to guide
municipality officers in learning from incidents. The design can be similar to what
already exists for the Fire Department.
- External Professional. In a learning arena an external professional supports in
bringing specific learning points to the surface. As a result, an advice can be
formed on how to proceed with these learning points.
5 The STARR method analyses a specific situation, in which the individual had to fulfill a specific task. The
individual indicates what action he took to fulfill the task. The method ends with discussing the result and
reflecting on the process.
65
- Process Reflection. Once reflection took place, specific questions or needs
might arise from this process. These should be then addressed in a next
learning activity to design these in a more suitable way.
Recommendation 6: Multi-platform E-learning System/Application
The approaches of implementing blended learning through e-learning platforms or
applications vary throughout the different safety regions. Nearly every aspect of the
continuous learning cycle can be integrated into these media. Some examples of how
such tools could be used include.
- Part of the Formal Learning Process. They could provide supplementing sources
of information to trainings or even provide further trainings on specific
competences.
- Support Evaluation Procedures. These could include evaluations of trainings,
evaluations of incidents and performance, evaluation of cases such as other
incidents or evaluations of competences through testing. In combination with
questions or quizzes, these tools could aid in developing periodic assessments
of municipality officers competence levels. The element of games and quizzes
could additionally further facilitate a fun way of informal learning.
- Platform for Knowledge Exchange and Networking. Platforms can be established
within and between municipalities/safety regions. This could be achieved
through an interactive e-learning platform or app that allows for interactions
between the learners.
- Informing about News. IFV could use an e-learning tool in cooperation with the
regions to update all municipality officers on any new developments. This could
be done through newsletters or even video or audio podcasts.
Using e-learning or apps for these processes has the benefit that IFV can control and
monitor any developments. Moreover, these tools allow cooperation and knowledge
exchange between members of municipalities, regions, IFV and even the rescue
services. IFV and the regions could actively monitor the progress of individuals or teams
in multiple learning stages and facilitate interventions as needed.
66
Developing such tools on a national level has multiple benefits. Firstly, costs could be
reduced if there is only one approach across the entire Netherlands, rather than several
municipalities developing such tools independently. This does not mean that every
region needs to use the exact same elements and functions but rather that there is one
supplier and architecture that can then be customized. Secondly, having one approach
allows for multiple contributors of content into the system. This would allow IFV and the
regions to truly share information on a national level and thus enhance the knowledge
exchange.
One potential downside to these instruments is the high costs involved. These costs
consist of both a monetary nature but also require large amounts of time investments.
Therefore, we recommend that IFV introduces a national approach to blended learning
through either an e-learning platform or a multiple device application. This system
should include elements of formal and informal learning.
67
8 Conclusion
We start this final section of our report by summarizing our research findings. Following
this, we discuss limitations to our research and highlight next steps to ensure effective
implementation of a vision to maintain competences. As a last step, we address valuable
insights from the field that were not directly related to our research objective. We still
want to share these findings as they represent valuable needs from the municipal
officers and should thus be addressed in further studies.
8.1 Research Summary
The core of this research was to provide IFV with possible ingredients for a strategy on
maintaining competences of municipal crisis management officers. To achieve this goal,
we gathered data from three different sources. In the first step we identified main
findings from an academic perspective. To supplement this information we conducted
eight interviews with staff from rescue services and additional information sources.
These interviews were focused on best-practices from the field. In a last step we gained
insights into the learning needs of a twelve municipal crisis management officer by
asking them questions about their feeling of preparedness and general awareness on
maintaining competences. Based on these three pillars we identified commonalities that
served as the foundation for our advice and recommendations.
Based on the information from the three pillars, our main conclusion on possible
ingredients for a vision are the following: first, our research has shown that there is
indeed a need to maintain competences as skills can deteriorate over time if they are
not used regularly. Before any system is implemented, it is important to define what
level proficiency is equal to being competent and thus what competence level should
be maintained exactly. Secondly, a uniform approach is desirable. However there is the
need to include the municipalities in the design of such as system. Insights from
municipality secretaries and the attitudes of the municipal officers have shown that this
is important to foster acceptance of the system. Thirdly, there should be a shared
responsibility in regard to maintaining competences. This implies that the individual is
responsible for the communication of his or her learning needs as well as participation
in learning activities. It is thus important to select the right people for the roles of
municipal officers, as they need to be motivated to maintain their competences.
However, the organization should provide support and opportunities in this
undertaking. Especially room for maintaining competences is important, as our field
research concluded that the biggest obstacle was lacking time. Last but not least, a
68
strategy on maintaining competences should include a system of formal, informal and
social learning. To support these three components, reflection and e-learning can be a
valuable tools.
Based on these ingredients, our research provided recommendations on possible ways
to implement a system of continuous learning. These recommendations are based on
best practices from the field as well as the translation of the learning needs into actual
steps. Our recommendations comprise a wide palette of possibilities. This is because
learning needs of municipal officers differ widely depending on their level of experience
or frequency to engage in crisis management. As such, IFV can use this palette of
recommendations to develop a vision for effectively maintaining competences.
The next natural step for IFV is now to use the possible
ingredients as well as recommendations to formulate a
vision on maintaining competences. It is however
important to be aware of several limitations of our
research. These limitations need to be evaluated carefully
before implementing a vision on maintaining
competences. We address these limitations below and
recommended steps for further research to overcome
these limitations.
8.2 Limitations and Implications for Further Research
We believe that it is crucial to precisely know the target group with regard to current
maintenance activities before implementing a vision. During our field research we
noticed that many safety regions and municipalities already have initiated activities to
maintain competences. As our project was limited to a sample of twelve municipal
officers, it is recommendable to widen the scope of interviews and investigate what
activities are already implemented to maintain competences.
The restricted sample of municipal officers is also a limitation
with regard to the learning needs of the officers. Our advice
for a vision and consequent recommendations are based on
the insights of our research partners on for instance specific
learning needs. With the selection of safety regions we already
acknowledged and ensured diversity of learners. However,
1. Use the possible
ingredients and
recommendation to
develop a vision on
maintaining competences.
2. Identify the
learning needs of a
broader group of
municipal officers.
69
each safety region and municipality has distinct needs; as such it is advisable to gather
insights in the whole population of municipal officers. This can help to ensure that the
strategies for maintaining competences clearly match these diverse needs.
Additionally, with regard to our sample there remains the risk of an availability bias.
Only the municipal officers willing to participate were interviewed. This might have
biased our results with regard to awareness of the need to maintain competences. All
municipal officers either felt adequately prepared or
were willing to engage in activities to further develop
their competences. To identify adequate measures for
municipal officers who are less aware of the need to
maintain competences, it is recommendable to
identify their learning needs as well. Asking the
municipal workers about what they perceive
important in staying prepared also helps to foster
acceptance of a uniform approach to competence maintenance. Linked to that, our
map of geographical positions of selected safety regions has shown that we have
mainly interviewed municipal officers from safety regions in the South of the
Netherlands. This was partly due to availability reasons of these officers. It would be
valuable to conduct further research of regions with a different geographical position to
identify whether the lacking willingness to cooperate in our study has implications for
their awareness for the need to maintain competences.
A further limitation refers to the design of our research. We used semi-structured
interviews to identify the level of preparedness of the municipal officers. As such, the
level of preparedness is based on their own perceptions and thus lacks an objective
component to assess whether they really stay competent after the initial training. We
recommend using an objective measure to identify their true level of preparedness. It
would also be advisable to instruct an expert in the field of crisis management to
conduct a second qualitative study to validate our research results.
Additionally, with regard to the design of our research, the method of conducting semi-
structured interviews has weaknesses in its nature. On
the one hand, it entails the risk of socially desirable
answers. Although we perceived the municipal officers as
open and authentic, this risk cannot be completely ruled
out. One the other hand, there is always the risk of an
unobserved heterogeneity bias. Hence, although having
used the same interview questionnaire and thorough briefings with the entire project
group, the interviews differed in time, language, setting (Skype, phone, personal),
3. Investigate whether
willingness to participate in
this study is linked to
awareness of need to
maintain competences.
4. Use an objective
competence assessment
tool to avoid limitation of
qualitative research.
70
interviewer and interviewee. Hence, several factors such as the interviewee’s time, mood
and ability to express him-/herself in a different language could have influenced the
result.
8.3 Next Steps for Effective Implementation
We have already pointed out the next step of IFV should be
to use our suggestion for developing a vision on maintaining
competences. At this point we would like to emphasize that
we designed our recommendations as a palette of possible
ways to achieve continuous learning. As such, it is not the
goal to use all sub-components of the recommendations for
all safety regions. It needs to be carefully evaluated which
sub-parts of the recommendations apply best to which
safety region depending on their diversity of learnings. Informal learning for instance
might not be possible to the same amount in all safety regions. A possible next step
should now focus on the evaluation of these recommendations in terms of their
effectiveness depending on the learning needs of the officers. Additionally, our
recommendations are not an exclusive list of possible ways to ensure a system of
continuous learning. The goal of our project was to provide possible ingredients for a
vision and recommendations that can contribute to that.
It is furthermore important to keep in mind that we took
the initial training based on the qualification profiles as
the starting point of our research. During our interviews,
it was mentioned that not all qualification profiles were
still up-to date. The qualification profiles will be updated
by the end of June 2015. It is thus recommendable to use
the input of the new qualification profiles for future
studies on competence of crisis management officers.
8.4 Valuable Insights Beyond the Scope of this Project
Our project concentrated on identifying strategies to maintain competences of
municipal crisis management officers. During our research, municipal officers shared
additional information that is valuable for ensuring high performance in crisis
management whatsoever. We would like to share these recurring topics as they can also
provide the basis for future project on municipal crisis management.
5. Evaluate the
recommendations in
terms of effectiveness
depending on the
diversity of learners.
6. Use input of the
updated qualification
profiles for further
studies on competence
maintenance.
71
Selection
One recurring topic was selecting the right people for crisis management roles. We
have incorporated this aspect in terms of selecting motivated individuals that are willing
to maintain their competences by engaging in learning activities. Nevertheless, several
municipal officers emphasized the need of selecting
dedicated and committed people that are willing to work in
crisis management and thus engage fully in this profession.
It was pointed out that crisis management is not just a role
that can be done besides a regular job but is a “job for
professionals”. We conclude from our interviews that it
would be worth investigating whether crisis management
should be separated from the daily job.
Cooperation
A second recurring topic was about the cooperation between different stakeholders
involved in crisis management. We have addressed that topic in terms of knowledge
exchange as a way to maintain competences. Nevertheless, various kinds of information
sources emphasized that getting to know each other and the corresponding role each
person is responsible for has an impact on the performance during crisis situation. The
network and knowledge of team dynamics will enable quick decision-making during an
actual crisis. That is also one of the reasons why multidisciplinary trainings are beneficial,
as people already have the opportunity to work together in the ‘cold phase’. We
conclude that it is worth investigating in how far cooperation can be facilitated to
ensure better performance during crisis situations as this should be the ultimate goal.
To conclude this report, we have seen that there is potential and the need for a vision to
maintain competences of municipal crisis management officers. We have provided
various insights from different information sources that can guide IFV in the
development in this vision. We wish IFV good luck with this undertaking and strongly
encourage them to consider our main takeaway: “Competence is not a state but a
continuous process”.
7. Investigate how
cooperation and
selection can improve
effective functioning in
crisis management.
72
References
1Limburg. (2015). Ontploffing Heerlen. Retrieved on May 27, 2015 from
http://www.1limburg.nl/ontploffing-heerlen.
Academie voor GHOR en Opgeschaalde Zorg. (2011). Handleiding ontwerpen,
ontwikkelen en begeleiden: Onderwijsvisie GHOR Academieen Opgeschaalde
Zorg. Arnhem.
Austin E.K. (1981). Guidelines for the Developing of Continuing Education merings for
Nurses. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
Bailey K.D. (1987). Methods of Social Research 3rd ed. The Free Press, New York.
Bartram, D., & Roe, R. A. (2005). Definition and Assessment of Competences in the
Context of the European Diploma in Psychology. European Psychologist, 10(2),
93.
Bartram, D., & Roe, R. A. (2008). Individual and organisational factors in competence
acquisition. The learning potential of the workplace, 71-96.
Bruinooge, P., Bitter, R., Helsloot, I., Dekker, K., Stierhout, J., & Langelaar, J. (2014).
Bevolkingszorg op orde 2.0: Eigentijdse bevolkingszorg, volgens afspraak.
Commissie Bevolkingszorg op orde: IFV Arnhem.
Burke, L. A., & Hutchins, H. M. (2007). Training transfer: An integrative literature
review. Human resource development review, 6(3), 263-296.
Catino, M. (2008). A review of literature: individual blame vs. organizational function
logics in accident analysis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management,
16(1), 53-62.
Cools, C.M.M.G., Duyvis, M.G., Stronkhorst, S.A., Timmermans, J.M., & Meulensteen, S.I.
(2014). Onderwijs en Onderzoek: GHOR en opgeschaalde acute- en publieke
gezondheidszorg. Academie voor GHOR en Opgeschaalde Zorg, IFV: Arnhem.
73
Cropley, A. (1980). Lifelong learning and systems of education: an overview. Towards
a system of lifelong education: Some practical considerations, 15. In: Cropley,
A. (ed.) Towards a System of Lifelong Education: some practical considerations.
Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Dale, M., & Bell, J. (1999). Informal learning in the workplace. London: Department for
Education and Employment.
Daudelin, M. W. (1997). Learning from experience through reflection. Organizational
dynamics, 24(3), 36-48.
De Grip, A. (2008). Economic perspectives of workplace learning. In: Nijhof, W. and L.
Nieuwenhuis. The learning potential of the workplace, Rotterdam: Sense
Publishers, pp. 15-29.
De Grip, A., & Van Loo, J. (2002). The economics of skills obsolescence: a review. The
economics of Skills Obsolescence: Theoretical innovations and empirical
applications, 21(38), 1.
De Swarte, F. (2014). Bevindingenrapportage 2014: Inventarisatie Bevolkingszorg.
Landelijk Operationeel Coördinatiecentrum: Driebergen.
Dekker, S. W. (2009). Just culture: who gets to draw the line?. Cognition, Technology
& Work, 11(3), 177-185.
Dror, Y. (2001). The Capacity to Govern: A Report to the Club of Rome. London: F.
Cass.
Drupsteen, L., & Guldenmund, F. W. (2014). What is learning? A review of the safety
literature to define learning from incidents, accidents and disasters. Journal of
Contingencies and Crisis Management, 22(2), 81-96.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams.
Administrative science quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
74
Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in continuing education,
26(2), 247-273.
Ericsson, K. A. (Ed). (1996). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert
Performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games. (pp. 1-50). Mahwah,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Farazmand, A. (2007). Learning from the Katrina crisis: A global and international
perspective with implications for future crisis management. Public Administration
Review, 67(s1), 149-159.
Garavan, T. N., Carbery, R., & Rock, A. (2012). Mapping talent development: definition,
scope and architecture. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(1),
5-24.
Gordon R.L. (1975). Interviewing: Strategy, Techniques and Tactics. Dorsey Press,
Illinois.
Handy, C. (1998). Beyond Certainty: The Changing Worlds of Organizations.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Harun, M. H. (2001). Integrating e-learning into the workplace. The Internet and
higher education, 4(3), 301-310.
Instituut Fysieke Veiligheid (2015, May 25). Re: Over het IFV [website]. Retrieved from
http://www.ifv.nl/Paginas/Over-IFV.aspx
Issenberg, S. B., McGaghie, W. C., Hart, I. R., Mayer, J. W., Felner, J. M., Petrusa, E.
R.,Waugh, R. A., Brown, D. D., Safford, R. R., Gessner, I. H., Gordon, D. L., & Ewy,
G. A. (1999). Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and
assessment. Jama, 282(9), 861-866.
Kaufman, H. G. (1982). Continuing Professional Development at Mid-career. Paper
presented at the College Industry Education Conference of the American Society
for Engineering Education, Washington D.C..
Kaufman, H. G. (1989). Obsolescence of Technical Professionals: A Measure and a
Model. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 38(1), 73-85.
75
Lampel, J., Shamsie, J., & Shapira, Z. (2009). Experiencing the improbable: Rare events
and organizational learning. Organization Science, 20(5), 835-845.
London, M., & Smither, J. W. (1999). Empowered self‐development and continuous
learning. Human Resource Management, (38), 3-15.
Louise Barriball, K., & While, A. (1994). Collecting Data using a semi‐structured
Interview: a discussion paper. Journal of advanced nursing, 19(2), 328-335.
Madsen, P. M., & Desai, V. (2010). Failing to learn? The effects of failure and success
on organizational learning in the global orbital launch vehicle industry.
Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 451-476.
Manuti, A., Pastore, S., Scardigno, A. F., Giancaspro, M. L., & Morciano, D. (2015).
Formal and informal learning in the workplace: a research review. International
Journal of Training & Development, 19(1), 1-17.
Marsick, V. J., & Volpe, M. (1999). The nature and need for informal learning.
Advances in developing human resources, 1(3), 1-9.
Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2001). Informal and incidental learning. New directions
for adult and continuing education, 2001(89), 25-34.
Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization's
learning culture: the dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire.
Advances in developing human resources, 5(2), 132-151.
Maurer, T. J. (2002). Employee learning and development orientation: Toward an
Integrative model of involvement in continuous learning. Human Resource
Development Review, 1(1), 9-44.
Nederlandse Vereniging voor Brandweerzorg en Rampenbestrijding (NVBR). (2006).
Werkboek Competentiegericht Oefenen.
Nederlandse Vereniging voor Brandweerzorg en Rampenbestrijding (NVBR). (2009).
Handleiding Blijvende Vakbekwaamheid: Persoonlijke ontwikkeling bij de
brandweer. Project Kwaliteit Brandweerpersoneel.
76
Richardson SA., Dohrenwend B.S. & Klein D. (1965). Interviewing. Basic Books, New
York.
Rodolfa, E., Bent, R., Eisman, E., Nelson, P., Rehm, L., & Ritchie, P. (2005). A Cube
Model for Competency Development: Implications for Psychology Educators
and Regulators. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36(4), 347.
Roe, R. A. (2002). Competences-A key towards the integration of theory and practice
in work psychology. Gedrag en Organisatie, 15(4), 203-224.
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of
training and development in organizations: What matters in practice.
Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74-101.
Schneider, S. K. (1995). Flirting with Disaster: Public Management in Crisis Situations.
Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Smith H.W. (1975). Strategies of Social Research: methodological imagination.
Prentice Hall International, London.
Stacey, R. D. (1992). Managing the Unknowable: Strategic Boundaries between Order
And Chaos in Organizations. San Francisico: Jossey-Bass.
Tannenbaum, S. I. (1997). Enhancing continuous learning: diagnostic findings from
Multiple companies. Human resource management, 36(4), 437-452.
Van Duin, M. & Wijkhuijs, V. (2015). De flexibiliteit van GRIP. Een onderzoek naar
mogelijkheden om de procedure flexibel toe te passen. Lectoraat
Crisisbeheersing van Instituut Fysieke Veiligheid: Arnhem.
Wahlström, B. (2011). Organisational learning–reflections from the nuclear industry.
Safety science, 49(1), 65-74.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity.
Cambridge University Press. New York.
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems.
Organization, 7(2), 225.
77
Wilson, M., Van Velsor, E., Chandrasekar, A., & Criswell, C. (2011). Grooming top
leaders: cultural perspectives from China, India, Singapore and the United
States. Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC.
List of Figures
Figure 1: Temple Structure of the project report
Figure 2: Municipal Population Care according to Bevolkingszorg 2.0 op orde (2014)
Figure 3: Extract from Qualification profiles regarding core tasks and qualities of the
three roles
Figure 4: Architectural Model of Competence according to Roe (1999)
Figure 5: Continuous Learning Cycle according to Tannenbaum (1997)
Figure 6: Geographical Location of Selected Safety Regions, Map from Ministry of
Security and Justice (2010)
Figure 7: Summary of the Temple Structure
Figure 8: Distribution of Responsibility
List of Tables
Table 1: List of Interview Partners from the Rescue Services and Practice
Table 2: Detailed Argumentation for Selected Safety Regions
Table 3: Descriptives of Municipal Crisis Management Officers
Table 4: Topic List for Interviews
Table 5: Coding Scheme
78
Appendices
Appendix I
Table 1. List of Interview Partners from the Rescue Services and Practice
Organization Role Region
Police Team leader in Police Crisis Team, Environmental
Analyst
Hollands-Midden
IFV/ Academie voor
GHOR en Opgeschaalde
Zorg
Advisor OTO for GHOR and Opgeschaalde Zorg National
Municipality Municipality Secretary, Team leader of 10 GC’s Midden-en West
Brabant
Police Academy Manger of Education MMS (Meldkamer, Multi, SGBO) Midden-en West
Brabant
Fire Department Volunteer fire fighter, Responsible for Education in
the Region
Noord- en Oost-
Gelderland
V&R Academie Expert on the Development of Training National
Municipality Municipality Secretary, Former OoD Gelderland-Zuid
Municipality Press Agent, Responsible for Education in the safety
region
Drenthe
Extract 1. Example Agenda from Interviews
Interview Agenda for GHOR:
The general competence maintenance for the medical assistance units and the
corresponding vision (formal vs. informal)
The process of the development of activities for maintaining competences
The way the medical assistance units distinguish between competences, skills and
knowledge. Where what information can be found.
How the cooperation between other regions and/or other services works.
Whether performance is evaluated on a regular basis and further activities are based
on these evaluations (learning from failure).
What is your vision on maintaining competences for the three roles (formal vs.
informal)?
What is your vision on training people for crisis situations?
Do you think the transfer is smaller because of high stress levels?
Do you think tools such as simulation are foolproof to ensure performance in
crisis situations?
79
Appendix II
Table 2. Detailed Argumentation for Selected Safety Regions
Safety Region Criteria for Selection6
Brabant-Noord
No listed GRIP 4 incident within the last ten years: possible indicator of
perception towards competence maintenance
Distinct types of risks: location of air base, transport of dangerous goods
through pipelines
Long tenure of crisis manager: possible indicator of experience level and
thus preparedness
Interviewee volunteered to become crisis manager
Gelderland-Zuid
Last GRIP 4 incident in 2011
Reported low incident frequency
Mostly urban region
Distinct types of risk: Natural disasters (floods and forest fires); Waal as the
most important water transport route in the Netherlands; BRZO7-
companies
Cooperation required with Germany and Europoort (different safety
structures)
Long tenure of crisis officer: possible indicator of experience level and thus
preparedness
Midden en West-Brabant
Distinct types of risks: transport of dangerous goods between harbors of
Antwerp and Rotterdam (adherence to external safety standards)
Short tenure of crisis officer: GC since 2015
Last GRIP 4 in 2011
Cooperation with different safety regions during GRIP 4
Region is known for its good reputation in safety issues
6 Sources: risicokaart.nl; websites of safety regions, for instance Brabant.nl (Midden en West-Brabant and
Noord-Brabant); vrgz.nl (Gelderland-Zuid); vru.nl (Utrecht), website of the Police.
7 BRZO = Besluit risico’s zware ongevallen. These companies contain a large amount of dangerous goods.
80
Utrecht Cooperation: Adjacent to and thus likely cooperation with safety region
Amsterdam-Amstelland where a likelihood of high “natural training rate” is
present due to high GRIP incident rate, distinct types of crises due to
location in adjacent region)
No GRIP 4 incident listed within the last ten years
Different participants for the same role to compare perception; participants
differ with regard to tenure (identify possibility of skill deterioration)
Zeeland Recent GRIP 4 incident in 2014. Possible indicator of perception towards
competence maintenance. Likely that interview partners participated in this
crisis and can provide us with insights in their role during this crisis situation.
Distinct type of crises and high risk profile: natural disaster (floods and forest
fires) but also risk due to nuclear power station in Borssele and the
Belgische Doel (4 stations) and ships
Potential coordination with Belgian municipalities and also multinational
cooperation on ships (different structures in crisis management)
Smallest region of the municipalities that we look at
Zuid-Holland Cooperation: due to location possible cooperation with Midden- en
Westbranbant and Rotterdam-Rijnmond
Distinct types of risk: floods (below sea level); transportation on water way
of dangerous goods; complex system of energy transport
Last GRIP 4 incident in 2011
Different officers from different roles to compare their insights and
validate statements on for instance learning needs, skill deterioration
Zuid-Limburg Very recent GRIP 3 incident in Heerlen (20. April 2015), incident that
requires long post processing. This also required high levels of
cooperation with different municipalities within the region (Brunssum and
Kerkrade)
Distinct types of crises: presence of chemical industry and risk toxic
accidents
Impact of crises would be catastrophic, but likelihood would be not very
high
Zuid-Limburg has a high level of organized crime. A multidisciplinary
taskforce was initiated.
Due to geographical positioning close to Belgium and Germany, crossing-
border coordination is also likely to be necessary
81
Table 3. Descriptives of Municipal Crisis Management Officers
Table 4. Topic List for Interviews
Topic
Research Indicator Sample question
Job in General / / / Competences (in crisis situations)
Knowledge/skills/abilities and competences (Boselie, 2010) Qualification Profiles (Opleidingskader) Potential for informal learning (Marsick & Watkins, 2001)
List of relevant competences and KSAs Potential overlap that allows for regular informal training
Think of one example of a crisis (like a GRIP 4). Describe the skills/ competences you used during this crisis. If you think about the skills needed during a crisis situation and during your daily job. Do you think there is a certain overlap between them?
Cooperation
Informal learning through networking (Marsick & Watkins, 2001)
Knowledge exchange/communication
Do you communicate and coordinate with crisis management officers from other municipalities outside of crisis situations?
Preparedness
Quality of Training (Salas, Tannenbaum, Kraiger & Smith-Jentsch, 2012) Transfer of Learning (Haskell, 2001) Transfer of Training (Blume, Ford, Baldwin & Huang, 2010)
Fit between training design and practice needs Context differences/ similarities
You had initial training when becoming a GC, OD, EA.. Think about the crisis situation you described earlier - In what way did the initial training help you in feeling prepared for handling this situation correctly (not only during but also after)? Please describe the level of stress and pressure that you experience during a crisis situation.
Descriptives OoD (n=3) GC (n=5) EA (n=4)
Tenure
Gender
Range 4 – 6 years
2 male, 1 female
5months – 7 years
5 male
3 – 8 years
3 male, 1 female
Had crisis experience All All All
Had initial training 3 5 3
82
Learning needs
Skills obsolescence (De Grip, 2002) Forgetting curve (Ebbinghaus, 1999)
Different levels of analysis (Buller & McEvoy, 2012) Importance of reflection, for e.g. the feeling of psychological safety (Edmondson, 1999) and/or learning from failure (Madsen & Desai, 2010) Feedback and challenges (Clark, 2005) and support for informal learning by the environment (Marsick & Watkins, 2003)
Potential for improvement Level of analysis Reflection Opportunity to give and receive feedback/ Supportive learning environment
Thinking about your preparedness for crises, where do you see gaps and potential for improvements on your competences? Do you feel that you need more training or guidance on an individual (knowledge, skills and competences) or team level (team working, communication and coordination)? Do you reflect on your performance and the cooperation in general with other municipality officers after a crisis situation? Do you feel supported by your municipality/safety region to develop and maintain your crisis competences?
General awareness
/ / /
83
Appendix III
Questionnaire for Municipal Crisis Management Officers
Start: Introduction
Good morning [Name Interviewee]. As was stated in the information sheet, we are a team of Master
students of Maastricht University. Our names are [Names Interviewer]. We study ‘Management of
Learning’ and are cooperating with the Instituut Fysieke Veiligheid on a project on maintaining the
competences of crisis municipality officers. We are examining three different roles, namely the
Algemeen Commandant, the Officier van Dienst and the Omgevingsanalyst. The input from the
interviews will support us in developing a strategy for maintaining competences of municipal crisis
management officers and eventually IFV in developing a vision on how municipalities can develop and
maintain competences over time, to not only get, but ‘stay prepared for the unpredictable‘.
The goal of this interview is to gain insight into your role during your daily job and crisis situations,
the extent to which you feel prepared for crisis situations and ways that you consider important to
maintain your crisis competences. The interview will take approximately 45 to 60 minutes. Again, we
want to thank you for participating in this research. Do you have any questions beforehand? (Check if
you received the consent form)
Job in general (daily job and role during crisis)
1. You work for [municipality]. Please describe your role in your regular job.
2. In crisis management, you are also a [GC, OD, EA]. How did you become a [GC, OD, EA]?
o Did you volunteer? Were you appointed?
3. How long are you in this position as a crisis officer already?
4. Please describe your role as a [GC, OD, EA].
5. Do you have experience in an actual crisis situation?
o Use an example to illustrate your role as a crisis management officer during a crisis
situation
6. Think of a crisis situation. Do you think it is more important to have a specific knowledge or
is it more about how to behave in a certain way? (identify whether he needs knowledge or
skills maintenance)
7. Thinking about this crisis situation, which skills and knowledge do you consider most
important for effective functioning?
8. If you think about the skills needed during a crisis situation and during your daily job. Do you
think there is a certain overlap between them?
In what way does it differ?
84
o If needed, refer to qualification profiles and use an example e.g. ’leadership skills’ or
‘decision-making skills’
Preparedness
9. How often do incidents happen in your municipality? (identify whether regular practice)
10. Before and during crisis situations, do you know where to get the information you need?
11. You had initial training when becoming a GC, OD, EA. Think about the crisis situation you
described earlier (at question 5).How did you experience the initial training?
o What were the most important takeaways from the training?
(Try to differ between competences, skills and knowledge)
o Think about the crisis situation you described earlier. In what way did the initial
training help you in feeling prepared for handling this situation correctly?
If you feel like it did not help you to prepare for a crisis, what could have
been done to support you in feeling prepared?
12. When you were in a crisis role, how did u experience the stress level?
o Did you feel that training adequately prepared you for the added dimension of
stress?
13. How much time passed between the initial training and today?
o How confident did you feel right after the training compared to now?
If there is a difference: why do you think there is?
14. If you experienced a crisis, how did you feel that influenced your competence level?
Learning needs
15. After the completion of the initial training to become a [GC, OD, EA], what activities do you
undertake to maintain competences for crisis management?
o How much time does this take you? (try to differentiate between activities to maintain
knowledge and activities to maintain skills)
16. Thinking about your preparedness for crises, where do you see gaps and potential for
improvements?
o Optional: picture yourself in a crisis situation, what are your main struggles/what do
you feel most unsure about?
17. If there were additional activities offered for maintaining your crisis management
competences. On which level would you like to develop?
o Individual (training for skills, knowledge)
o Team level (team work, communication and coordination)
85
18. How much time would you be willing to invest in participating in additional activities for
maintain crisis management competences?
19. After a crisis is over. Do you reflect on your performance and the cooperation in general with
other municipality officers?
o How did you feel about this? (helpful / waste of time?)
o If helpful, in what way did this help you?
o If no reflection, how did you feel about this? Would you have liked to reflect?
20. Do you feel supported by your municipality/safety region to develop and maintain your
crisis competences?
o If not, what kind of support from your municipality do you think would be valuable
to feel supported (summarize the possible gaps interviewee named at Q16)?
21. What kind of activities do you suggest your organization is able to offer which can support
you in feeling prepared for a crisis situation?
22. Who should monitor/who do you think is responsible for the maintenance of your
competences; you, IFV or your organization (Safety Region)? (discover a sense of
responsibility)
23. Explain informal learning in the workplace, e.g. use the 70/20/10 model. Distinguish between
workplace learning (70%) and learning through collaboration (20%). Do you engage in
informal learning within your municipality that helps you to develop your crisis management
competences? (learned during initial training and necessary for effective functioning in crisis
situation)
24. Do you think informal learning may support you in feeling prepared for crisis situations?
o If yes, do you have suggestions of how informal learning may be facilitated in your
role/municipality/region?
o If not, why not?
25. Do you share knowledge with other municipality or other crisis officers internal or external
outside of crisis situations? In what way?
26. Do you practice together with other municipality officers or other assistance units? And if
not, do you think it would be useful?
Conclusion
We are now at the end of our interview. Quickly summarize the core themes, use the topics e.g.
´feeling prepared, willingness to maintain competences, learning needs´. Keep in mind to start and
end your summary broad. Do you have any additional remarks?
On behalf of Maastricht University and the Instituut Fysieke Veiligheid, we would like to thank you
very much for participating in this interview.
86
Appendix IV
Table 5. Coding Scheme
Name:
Region and Municipality:
Daily occupation:
Role in Crisis:
(add if it was voluntarily or appointed and if he/she also has other (former) roles)
Tenure:
Had initial training: yes/no
Incidents experienced:
Core Theme Label Summary Quotes Job in general
Skills/knowledge needed in crisis [Q4,5,6, 7]
Working with hierarchy, political skills, low stress level. People with hands-on mentality. Mainly about behavior. He doesn’t know everything, but he knows where to get the people who possess the right specific knowledge
‘It’s all about behaving in a certain way. If I am becoming stressed, it will not only influence the effectiveness of my functioning, but also of my team. If a leader panics, he cannot give clear direction and people will panic’ ‘A communication advisor is way better than me in writing a catchy, strong communication piece concerning the crisis on internet for example. Why would I want to do that? I don’t need that specific knowledge; I do need to know how to get the knowledge I need to behave properly.’
Overlap skills [Q8] Giving people space and direction is something which is applicable in both situations daily job and crisis role Being used to working with people in hierarchy Political skills
‘I work via two principles. First, giving people the space they need to do the job which they are good at and second, giving them a general direction of where they need to go. Via observing, thinking and anticipating you can guide the professionals in a way so the right people are at the right spot’. ‘People who work in suits with stars and stripes do not take you seriously if you are working in the archive in your daily job in the municipality. You have
87
to already be in a high managing position if you want to give them some ‘tegenwicht?’
Preparedness General feeling of preparedness [Q10]
Feeling well prepared I have had the training, I followed the exams. Now I should be able to do this!
Training [Q11] Excellent training, but he believes it starts with good selection. This way you already have ‘the right people at the right spot’
Excellent training with even an exam.
Crisis experience [Q9, 14]
Maybe 1 incident per 2 months, and there are quit some people who are on call. So it could be that you never get called.
Yesterday I had an GRIP 2 incident!
Stress level experience [Q12]
- Being stressed is not in his character - Relaxed atmosphere during crisis: ‘Welcome, do you want coffee?’ - Already experiences stress during daily job from time to time - Excellent training from V&R Academie
‘I am not a person who gets stressed easily. I like action and I need it from time to time. My normal job is not boring certainly not, but the adrenaline of a crisis situation is something different.’
Skill deterioration [Q13]
On call since Jan 1 but only once experienced a crisis. He still feels competent, but afraid that his skills will deteriorate if there is no follow-up training.
Learning Needs Current maintenance activities [Q15, 26]
Trainings to upkeep competences, discussing cases which is not obligatory. 1 or 2 follow-up trainings per year
I have more need for follow-up trainings and official exams. This can be obligatory in my opinion. This way people feel more pressure to upkeep their competences if they have to pass official tests.
Dream: Vision on maintenance [Q16, 17, 21]
Follow-up trainings with official exams, more people who have piquet and take up their responsibility.
That you have more people who have piquet so you can switch a bit, but it is still important to have a small, well managed pool of people who take up their own responsibility.
Reflection [Q19] Technical reflection, no emotional reflection.
Informal learning [Q23, 24]
Learning from each other.
Cooperation [Q25] General perspective on maintaining
Time [Q18] Two/three times a year Responsibility [Q22] He feels it is his
responsibility. A lot of I feel there is not a lot of solidarity. Having piquet is
88
people say they have too little time or are too busy.
quit some commitment. A lot of people state that people need to do the job, but they never do it themselves. So that’s why I stepped up.
Support municipality [Q20]
Feels partly supported by municipalities
There is some understanding, but still a lot of my colleagues do not know what I do and they have me rather working my daily job.
Off topic