Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S...

16
Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R. Keränen (1) , Ylläsjärvi J. (2) , Passarelli R. (1) and Selzler J. (1) Heikki Pohjola, Vaisala (1) Vaisala, (2) Finnish Meteorolological Institute

Transcript of Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S...

Page 1: Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.

Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced AttenuationR. Keränen (1) , Ylläsjärvi J. (2) , Passarelli R. (1) and Selzler J. (1)

Heikki Pohjola, Vaisala

(1) Vaisala, (2) Finnish Meteorolological Institute

Page 2: Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.

Page 2 / ©Vaisala

Introduction

Attenuation due to the liquid water major challenge at weather radar frequencies (X and C bands)

Traditionally, this has justified investments in S band technology in climates of heavy precipitation

This situation has changed: Modern Dual Polarization C band weather radars are an attractive choice in all climates

The cost issue: A turnkey-installed C band system is 1/2 to 1/3 the price of an S band system

Page 3: Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.

Page 3 / ©Vaisala

What is attenuation?

Attenuation is the reduction of intensity of electromagnetic wave along the path of propagation

It is caused by scattering and absorption by the propagation medium

Strongly dependent on wave lenght: C band (λ=5 cm) three times higher than S band (λ=10 cm) and X band (λ=3 cm) 30 times stronger than C band (λ=5 cm) (Doviak and Zrnic 1993)

In addition to drop size characteristics water induced attenuation depends on temperature: It is about 50% stronger at 0 C degrees compared to 20 C, in comparable rain

Page 4: Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.

Page 4 / ©Vaisala

Typical values of attenuation at C band

Cause of attenuation

Hail

Rain

Mixed rain

Snow

Clouds

Atmospheric gases

Increasing attenuation

Typical value (C-band)

~ 10 - 30 dBZ

~ 2 - 25 dBZ

~ 1 - 5 dBZ ?

~ 0 - 3 dBZ

~ 0 - 3 dBZ

~ 0 - 2 dBZ

Battan, L. J., 1973

Page 5: Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.

Page 5 / ©Vaisala

Example of attenuation at C band in Finland

Page 6: Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.

Page 6 / ©Vaisala

Example of attenuation at C band in Finland

Page 7: Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.

Page 7 / ©Vaisala

Attenuation correction in single polarization radars

Traditional correction method uses a power law relation between specific attenuation and reflectivity (single polarization radars) (Hitschfeld and Bordan, 1954)

This method is unstable High sensitivity to radar calibration errors Uncertainty in correction bigger or equal to errors due to the

attenuation Not very widely used operationally

Page 8: Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.

Page 8 / ©Vaisala

Correction method is based on the measurement of differential phase (ΦΦdpdp): ): Phase difference between the received signals in horizontal and vertical channels (Bringi et al, 1990)

Nearly linear relationship between the specific attenuation (adp) and the evolution of Φdp in range (K dp ),

Rule of thumb: Change of 10 degrees in differential phase <-> path integrated attenuation of 1 dB

Sources of uncertainty: Sampling noise in Φdp , Non-Rayleigh scatters such as large drops, hail/graupel mixtures of rain, non-meteorological targets (clutter)

Can be diminished with advanced filtering techniques

Attenuation correction in dual polarization radars

Page 9: Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.

Page 9 / ©Vaisala

How Differential Phase Works

Page 10: Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.

Page 10 / ©Vaisala

Case study of significant precipitation in Huntsville, Alabama, USA

The observations by the ARMOR polarimetric C Band radar (Petersen et al 2007)

The independent observations made at the NEXRAD S Band radar are used for comparison to an unattenuated reference

Squall line approaching Huntsville from north-west, maximum reflectivities exceed 58 dBZ

Page 11: Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.

Page 11 / ©Vaisala

C Band radar

S Band radar

Reflectivity, dBZ

Page 12: Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.

Page 12 / ©Vaisala

C Band radar, dBZ

S Band radar

C Band radar, Φdp

Page 13: Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.

Page 13 / ©Vaisala

C Band radar, uncorrectedC Band radar, corrected

S Band radar

Reflectivity, dBZ

Page 14: Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.

Page 14 / ©Vaisala

A single ray comparison of C Band reflectivities, azimuth 40 degrees

-20-10

0102030405060708090

0 20 40 60 80 100 120Earth Range (km)

Re

flect

ivity

(d

B)

Zh(S-band)Zh(C-band) observedZh(C-band) corrected

Page 15: Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.

Page 15 / ©Vaisala

Conclusions

Dual polarization techniques applied in C Band weather radar specifies C Band radar to be useful in "all climate weather conditions"

Dual polarization C Band weather radars with advanced signal processing techniques offers new methods to mitigate attenuation

Attenuation is not anymore major limitation for the broader use of short wave lengths technology in climates of intense rain

Applying attenuation correction techniques demands modern weather radar with latest dual polarization technology

Page 16: Comparison of Polarimetric C Band Doppler Radar Observations with Reflectivity Fields obtained at S Band: A Case Study of Water induced Attenuation R.

Page 16 / ©Vaisala

Correction factor for rain intensity with different bias

Bias /dB

Co

rre

ctio

n fa

ctor