Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

42
COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND NONCONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION GUIDED BY; DR. SURENDRAN A., HOD & PROF OF CE DEPT.

description

 

Transcript of Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

Page 1: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND NONCONVENTIONAL

CONSTRUCTION

GUIDED BY;DR. SURENDRAN A.,

HOD & PROF OF CE DEPT.

Page 2: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

GROUP MEMBERS

BINI A.V.CHANDNI P.K.DHANYA U.SRUTHY P.SUSAN SUNNY KOCHERIL

Page 4: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

INTRODUCTION

Ar. Laurie Baker is one who worked on cost effective construction technique as its best.

Baker showed, in fact , that sustainable technologies when adopted with care and creativity, could lead to a unique architectural expression.

Page 6: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction
Page 7: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction
Page 8: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

VARIATION IN COST

Page 9: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

BUILDING COST Building Material Cost : 65 to 70 % Labour Cost : 65 to 70 %

( As per Central Building Research Institute (CBRI))

Page 10: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

COST EFFECTIVE BUILDING MATERIALS

The basic aspect in the choice of a material

“EMBEDDED ENERGY”

Page 11: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

COST EFFECTIVE BUILDING MATERIALSStabilized Compressed Earth Blocks :- Are made of mud with suitable percentage of cement and compacted in block making machine with no burning.

Economical, stronger, low embedded energy and simple to manufacture

Page 12: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

Reconstituted stone blocks / Stone filler blocks If small pieces of stone only are

available, ‘reconstituted stone blocks’ provides the best alternative masonry block.

Can be used for foundations and walls.

Page 13: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

Waste material content 30-40% by volume of block.

Validated by BMTPC, IS 12440-1985

Better facing

Page 14: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction
Page 15: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

COST EFFECTIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR DIFFERENT BUILDING ELEMENTS

Page 16: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

WRONG CONCEPT OF FOUNDATION

Conventional method

Foundation in comparatively hard soil

Better option

Page 18: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

FOUNDATION Arch foundation

Page 19: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

Under ream pile foundation

Page 20: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

FOUNDATION USING BAMBOO

Page 21: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

BAMBOO PILES IN MUDDY SOILS

Page 22: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction
Page 23: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

Bamboo reinforced surface beams in lime concrete

Page 24: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

Under reamed piles

Most economical pile

Page 25: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

WALL

Page 26: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

STABILIZED MUD BLOCK WALL

Page 27: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

ARTICULATED SLENDER MASONRY

Page 28: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

RAT TRAP BOND WALL

Page 29: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

FEATURES OF RAT TRAP BOND WALL

Uses 425 bricks per cubic meters instead 500 bricks.

Saves mortar. Thermal comfort. Can be left exposed, saves external

plaster. Tested and validated by Anna

University.

Page 30: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

LINTEL

Page 31: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction
Page 32: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

ROOF Bamboo roof slab RCC Filler slab

Page 33: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

Ferro cement channels

Rural house

Page 34: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

Funicular shell Bricks/ waste stone laid in a doubly

curved profile with a shallow rise at the centre.

Utilizes waste material Reduction of cement and steel

Page 35: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

Paint is an important material used in construction, which is

“Non recyclable”

Page 36: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

FINISHES• Exposed masonry with pointed finish• Non erodible mud plaster• Lime plaster• Lime-cement combination plaster• Natural extracts as paint (cashew oil,

bee’s wax, linseed oil)• Clay with adhesives as paint • Lime wash

Page 37: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

Exposed brick masonry with flush pointed finish.

Page 38: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

PROGRESS OF PROJECT Works have done:

1. Preliminary Study on conventional materials

2. Data collection of various non conventional materials

3. Study of practical applications of nonconventional technique

Page 39: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

4. Planning and specification for a building in both conventional and

nonconventional system5. Training programs and discussions

regarding relevance in COSTFORD and Kerala State Nirmiti Kendra.

Page 40: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

Works to be done :

1. Quantity survey of the conventional and nonconventional residential

building

2. Stabilized mud block manufacturing and testing

Page 41: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

3. Reconstructed laterite stone blocks manufacturing and testing

4. Energy auditing

5. Filler slab design as per grid beam theory

Page 42: Comparison of conventional and nonconventional construction

CONCLUSION

Relevance of the topic with respect to the present scenario.

What we young engineers could promise our society