Comparing Corporate Performance | Craig Mackenzie

16
Comparing corporate performance on climate change – what metrics? Dr. Craig Mackenzie Director, Carbon Benchmarking Project University of Edinburgh Business School

Transcript of Comparing Corporate Performance | Craig Mackenzie

Page 1: Comparing Corporate Performance | Craig Mackenzie

Comparing corporate performance on climate change – what metrics?

Dr. Craig MackenzieDirector, Carbon Benchmarking ProjectUniversity of Edinburgh Business School

Page 2: Comparing Corporate Performance | Craig Mackenzie

Why benchmark corporate climate change performance?

“The energy efficiency of individuals and firms often varies widely within the same market…methodologies for identifying best practice, for example through benchmarking… have the potential to support wider policies on mitigation.”

Stern Report. p.388

Page 3: Comparing Corporate Performance | Craig Mackenzie

The scope for low cost reductions

Source: Vattenfal

Page 4: Comparing Corporate Performance | Craig Mackenzie

Overcoming the barriers

• Lack of strategic significance

• Organisational inertia

Page 5: Comparing Corporate Performance | Craig Mackenzie

Supermarkets benchmark

Page 6: Comparing Corporate Performance | Craig Mackenzie

Breakdown of the Tesco footprint

Add note on fridge energy?

Refrigeration

Tesco CSR Report 2007

Page 7: Comparing Corporate Performance | Craig Mackenzie

Direct CO2e emissions

Total UK Carbon Emissions

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

Somerfield Cooperative Waitrose Marks &Spencer

Sainsburys Morrisons Asda Tesco

Tonn

es C

O2e

No Data

Page 8: Comparing Corporate Performance | Craig Mackenzie

Relative carbon intensity?

Carbon intensity (tonnes CO2e/£turnover)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Somerfield Sainsburys Marks &Spencer

Tesco Cooperative Waitrose Asda Morrisons

CO

2e/£

turn

over

NB: this slide does not give an accurate comparison of performance

No Data

Page 9: Comparing Corporate Performance | Craig Mackenzie

Data issues

Carbon intensity (CO2e/£tunover)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Somerfield Sainsburys Marks &Spencer

Tesco Cooperative Waitrose Asda Morrisons

CO

2e/£

turn

over

NB: this slide does not give an accurate comparison of performance

Data estimated

Data incomplete

No Data

Few use GHG protocol

Page 10: Comparing Corporate Performance | Craig Mackenzie

Additionality questions

Carbon intensity (CO2e/£tunover)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Somerfield Sainsburys Marks &Spencer

Tesco Cooperative Waitrose Asda Morrisons

CO

2e/£

turn

over

NB: this slide does not give an accurate comparison of performance

Use of biodiesel

Green tariffelectricity

Green tariffelectricity

No Data

Page 11: Comparing Corporate Performance | Craig Mackenzie

Business comparability issues

Carbon intensity (CO2e/£tunover)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Somerfield Sainsburys Marks &Spencer

Tesco Cooperative Waitrose Asda Morrisons

CO

2e/£

turn

over

NB: this slide does not give an accurate comparison of performance

Food processing

business

Foodnon-food

split

Foodnon-food

splitNo Data

Page 12: Comparing Corporate Performance | Craig Mackenzie

Meaningful comparison?

Carbon intensity (CO2e/£tunover)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Somerfield Sainsburys Marks &Spencer

Tesco Cooperative Waitrose Asda Morrisons

CO

2e/£

turn

over

NB: this slide does not give an accurate comparison of performance

Food processing

business

Foodnon-food

split

Food-non-food

split

Foodnon-food

split

Use of biodiesel

Green tariffelectricity

Green tariffelectricity

Data estimated

Data incomplete

No Data

Page 13: Comparing Corporate Performance | Craig Mackenzie

Add note on fridge energy?

Refrigeration

Tesco CSR Report 2007

An alternative strategy

% f-gas leakage pa

KWh/linear meterof refrigeration

Diesel litres/pallet delivered

Average store energy rating

% electricity from renewables weighted for additionality

Page 14: Comparing Corporate Performance | Craig Mackenzie

Advantages of granular metrics

Allows meaningful performance comparison Identifies specific strengths and weaknessesEnables identification of causes for differing

performancePotential to accelerate uptake of best practice

Page 15: Comparing Corporate Performance | Craig Mackenzie

Wider implications

Benchmarking needs:

• Better data quality• Sharper standards• Segmental carbon reporting• Identification and reporting on normalisation factors• Avoiding carbon reductionism• Activity-specific metrics• Activity/sector-specific reporting standards

• Collaborative sector/activity projects to define the above