Compared With a Systematic Dialogue Between the Islamic and Christian)

8/14/2019 Compared With a Systematic Dialogue Between the Islamic and Christian)

1/6

Substantive dialogue

Means necessary to secure peace to the world

(Compared with a systematic dialogue between the Islamic and Christian)

Dr / Zeinab Abdel-Aziz

Professor of French Civilization

Egypt

Dialogue is the means of expression between two or more, and expand over the words "or more"to include a different group number or even entire peoples, that is the mainstay of links betweenindividuals in their dealings and make peaceful coexistence possible.Therefore, we chose the selection of "dialogue" as a basis of peaceful coexistence betweenMuslims and non-Muslim subject of this research; as there is between the employees of all

religions who do not want war and conflict, and seeks to world peace, objectively and honestly,Until they all go in this research, which is divided into three parts:1 - the concept of dialogue among Muslims.2 - the concept of dialogue when Christians (through the documents of the Catholic Church,which leads the process of dialogue at the global level)3 - should be developed for common rules before you start the dialogue and not to the exclusionof certain points for allegedly outside the scope of the debate.1 - the concept of dialogue among Muslims:Before we take up this concept, start with an outline of the dialogue itself, for controls, andmethods and obstacles. Explains Mr. Mohamed Badri ([i]) the importance of dialogue andcontrols, including: the full hearing, and the demilitarization of ideas; because the goal ofdialogue is to take advantage of these ideas, not the destruction of people, and left mirrors anddissonance; that the dialogue sort of consultation, which must of truth and clarity in the idea andmethod, and adjust the path of dialogue with science and justice and common sense practice, andaccess to the goal of dialogue of the shortest path away from the fraud and prevarication.The art of dialogue depends on several methods, including: well-prepared to pave the commongrounds, is intended for constructive dialogue and not crush the other, or Ivhamh, and acommitment to silence the conscious and logical sequence, and the introduction of meaningfulopen to question, in accordance with the aphorism "art of the possible dialogue impossible", withwork on the dialogue away from the constraints of lack of access to the division and discord. Andmost important of these constraints: intolerance and partisan, arbitrary classification, self-bloated, single-view, the circular argument or sophistry, and xenophobia.Najib explains Professor Nur al-Din ([ii]) that there was no direct meaning to the word of dialoguein the written language, but considered by linguists, derived from Populus, including Ohar himanswer any reply, Ohrt and his answer, and Ohar word. And the name of Interviewing and Ahoir,and said: I heard Hoiarhama and dialogue; and interacting with are: transponders, and dialogue torespond (to San Arabs). The interviewer reviewed by any to speak, Ijaoppe transponders, and

dialogue to respond to the [Tabari].The debate in the language means "high twisting" Jdlt cord Ojdelh controversy if stressed Vtlthtwist and read out the arbitrator .. The controversy is the conflict: Arguing Arguing controversyVangdl and twisted: Aljaddalp wrestled to a scheduled .. Magdala Mulki Paljdalp, the Earth (SanArabs).In other words, the dialogue is based on the literature and certain controls, through discussionand exchange of views, committed toOr work so far with a level of human progress, and the controversy assumed the existence ofantagonists and violent, and intensity as well as arrogance .. The word has taken on the idea oftalking useless controversy which is subject to the idea of endless mazes, but the most important


2/6

distinction between the two is that the dialogue depends on convincing the other party, and thecontroversy is not intended only to wrestle the opponent in order to destroy it.Therefore, the emphasis - in the Islamic concept - the need for impartiality in the request for truth,and to enter the arena rights dialogue in search of the right even though it was when hisopponent, that is, axes - in the words of Abu Hamid al-Ghazali ([iii]) -: "Knashid stray ; does notdifferentiate between stray on to show his hand or the hands of the assisted, and felt certain hisfriend not an adversary, and to thank him if you knew him or showed him the error right. "Explains Mr. Ahmed Aleqtisadiah ([iv]) characterize the Islamic approach based on "the overallbalance of justice and the full, there may be something obscure from the truth, or be buried a bitof evidence that supports the offending words, this recipe is ugly indicate self-love and the lack ofequity.And the integrity and objectivity of the center axes of the axes based on the scientific method,which is expressed in modern terminology: Scientific Affairs.Islam has urged dialogue to deal with the other because it is closer to the nature of the messageand content, and forbade the controversy edema Almottagadelan especially those who arguewithout knowledge .. But see Mr. Mohammed Fadlallah ([v]) that the Qur'an is the "Book of thedialogue," and that his primary goal is to reach to the right; also teaches the Koran wrong rejectedin toto in any site of its positions, to refrain from adopting wrong or to recognize its legitimacy,That is not to reject the falsehood is a treason to the cause of right.The defamation of God - the Almighty - of the right to withhold or wears unjustly, saying: (O

people of the book does not unjustly and ye shall put on the right you hide the truth and youknow) [Al-Imran: 71]; (Tlpsoa not truth with falsehood and conceal the truth and you know) [al-Baqarah: 42] .It is being called Professor / Muhammad Fadlallah, the words "The Book of Dialogue" at randomon the Koran, is already include various types of dialogue and the different variances, including:dialogue with atheists, agnostics and to date, with the deniers of prophecy, and with the People ofthe Book, Jews, Christians, and dialogue in the context of a question, and how to end thedialogue, the dialogue also includes fiction with the prophets and with some models of humanity.The word dialogue in the Holy Quran in three states: two in the cave: (said to his companion,interviewer I'm over you money and respect of men) [al-Kahf: 34], (owner, said his interviewer OkfrHim Who created you from dust) [al-Kahf: 37 ], and the third verse is contained in Surat argument:(and complain to God and God hears Thaurkma God is Hearer, Seer) [argument: 1].And extends the scene contain a single word of dialogue in the cave from verse 32 to verse 44between the two men, one rich in the large gardens and the other poor owner of a small garden.

This example includes not only a model for dialogue between the two regions, no matter howvaried points of view or different motives, but it contains - in addition to that - a means extendsacross time and space, as indicated by Mr. Abbas Mohajerani ([vi]), when he had compared theposition of men ( rich and poor) west of the position of Muslims, saying: "The case of the Westtoday Btgianh material and subscribed to the force and advanced technology and means ofsabotage and mass destruction like axes if the infidel gardens, and the situation of Muslims intheir weakness and delayed behind Western civilization and technology hubs such as the statusof insured men; with a difference large as the Muslims today do not have that confidence in Godand pride in monotheism, and steadfastness, sincerity, and strength of self-defense, which wascharacterized by the axes insured. "If this example was the physical aspect of earthly, the other example in Surat argue themetaphysical aspect; pointing out that God touches every thing and listen to the dialoguebetween people is the "Hearer, the Seer" ..The word "controversy Btnoietha language contained in the Koran twenty-nine times, which are

two related to the dialogue when the build up to reach the degree of controversy of any violence,which ranked the most severe of the dialogue of the widening gap between the views ofinterlocutors, however, believe Almighty God recommends Muslim in his discussion withChristians with regard to faith, ie, more accurate and relevant topics and most unlike; It is aboutthe same message reunification, saying: (and do not argue people of the book but one that isbetter) [Spider: 46], (, and argue with the way that is best) [Nahl: 125].This is in line to be the meaning of the etiquettes of dialogue and debate with the concept of unityamong the people as reflected in the Koran: it provides for the diversity of human beings and thatthis diversity is intended to understanding and integration; and not discord and strife: (O people, Ihave created you from male and female and made you into nations and tribes so that sight of God


3/6

that God knows expert) [rooms: 13], which is illustrated by Professor Mohammad Hasan al-Amin([vii]), saying: "The idea of dating in the verse above is the idea of dialogue espoused by Islam, apath to unity, and perhaps the concept of acquaintance is the highest expression of the idea ofdialogue, a term that focuses on aspects of Islamic and humanitarian dimensions of the idea ofdialogue, the term includes a precise indication of the role of knowledge, mutual knowledge, toattain the highest forms of communication and interaction between individuals and humanitariangroups. "2 - the concept of dialogue when Christians:Recognize from the foregoing that the dialogue in Islam has an essential function related tohuman beings, and is accessible to the right and the deepening of faith, through knowledge,understanding and exchange of views well and one that is better ..In the West, has begun a dialogue with Plato that the art of stand-alone and is not intended to geta result .. Or in the words of Plato: "The goal of dialogue is not providing us with information andknowledge as far as its assistance to train in the art of debate!" , And moved the dialogue to enterin the field of interaction between Christianity and Islam, even the deadliest forms of debate hastaken various forms and horrific, and explains Julian Reyes ([viii]). How "the dialogue has startedwith Islam before the Crusades which stopped until the dissolution of preaching place, and howthis dialogue since the first moments was based on defamation and violence, and whose aim is todistort Islam and Muslims."Reyes points out that "the first reaction is due to the days where he received an czar Michael III of

Byzantium (842 AD - 867 AD) contain letters from Muslims rejected the idea of God incarnate inJesus. The Czar convert letters to Nestas, one of the intellectuals of the court, to answer them.Nestas and responded saying: "Muhammad is obsessed with the idea of his proof, the adoption ofdivine origin; which explains the method based on fraud, malice, hypocrisy, cunning and,pretending, and lies" and his research concluded that "the message of the Quranic revelation ofSatan" [page 231].He adds Julian Reyes, saying: "commentators and beat the Byzantines to the Qur'anic text to readit with their own eyes aggressive Christians against Islam .. and so gradually formed a huge gapbetween the Islamic and Christian conflict" [page 232].Then continue, saying: "It is noted that the objections of the Muslims has been one that did notchange in any place, is critical of the deity of Jesus, the mystery of the Trinity, the worship of theCross, and veneration of icons, and prejudice to the oneness of God", he explains how he"continued his controversial Christian in the search for evidence and proof that inferiority of Islamto Christianity, with emphasis on personal discredit Mohammed and his followers and

accusations of violence that's used. and after being beat on the Koran, the Prophet, saying: It isnot a house of God, and it is not capable of giving salvation of human beings. "Subsided and the Crusades until the dialogue started, aimed at trapping Islam by missionaries.In the view of c. Leclerc ([ix]) that the Rev. Peter Esquire (1092 to 1156 m) is a leading dialoguebetween Christianity and Islam in the West because "he told the Muslims: He will not start acrusade in the new weapons but words." Which reveals the real meaning of dialogue inChristianity since the first moments .. The dialogue initiated by the same priest with the respected"Muslim Spain and resulted in the extermination of all and throw away Islam from Spain," asdescribed (Julian Reyes on page 245) of his book in question.It is well established historically that was the first ordered the translation of the Quran into Frenchdays of the war recovery, the interpreter has been requested "that the translation to erase anytrace of Islam from the minds of Muslims who have been newly made Christians in the war [bookRegis Blashir" The Koran ", in 1969 ].There is no room here to talk about the start of the organization of missionaries in the late

Crusades after the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215, but Reyes was reviewed in detail to the modernera, he explains how he "thrive European imperialism throughout the nineteenth century, began tooccupy strategic positions have been taken away from the influence of Muslims, including: Egypt,Iran, Afghanistan and the Arab Middle East and North Africa "(p. 356), the intimate linkagebetween colonialism and missionary of the issues that you no longer need to be further evidence,Vmtabap ongoing events to explain how they have continued to this day .. But we will move toVatican II (1962 - 1965 AD), which represents a radical turning point in church history, Vatican;which decided to exclude or contain the ideological differences between them and the variouschurches to unite all in a war against Islam sweeping!The document, known as "in our time" of the Vatican II as there are some truths in other religions,


4/6

that are considered as a seed or parts of Christianity; should Tnekayaa of impurity, while thesame document stresses that "the Church's mission is not desist from preaching that Christ is theway, the truth, which is life; which people have to find when the completion of their religious lifeand the reconciliation of God with human beings through "!Explains Father Caspar ([x]) in his commentary on Vatican document in his dialogue with Islam:"The text of the document avoided taking a position on the debate about the relationship betweenbiblical heritage of Islam, has walked many specialists in Islam to the method of Massignon;which had been referred to the the presence of a small branch of the biblical heritage that theyItlqvoh, while another group insisted on the differences between the Koran and the Bible ..According to this second perspective is not Islam as a religion of the monotheistic religions fromAbraham, but simply by virtue of the gospel of religion-related metaphors taken from Judaism andChristianity, The refusal of the Academy to take a position on the conflict, which is not yet over,but only the development of Islam in the first row of the monotheistic religions other thanChristianity. "Thus, the church still does not recognize the authenticity of revelation in Islam and download inour master Muhammad, peace be upon him as the last of the prophets, simply to look "withappreciation" in the words of the document, to the Muslims who worship the one God living andlasting Rahman and the Almighty, the Creator of heaven and earth, who spoke to humans ".. no itdoes not recognize that he had spoken to Muhammad through the revelation, nor does it ring amessage after the reunification that revealed the Koran has been done in the distortion of their

texts and switch; addition to shirk Toliham God after Jesus!.Unfortunately, that dialogue should be the concept of the Church, since its inception and to thisday, does not mean it (the word crusade) instead of the arms in order to uproot Islam andproselytizing Muslims. There is no room here to cite all references: the Church, which includes anexplanation of the meaning of dialogue that concept; but we will cite some examples of the mostimportant or those that we obtained, the following are some excerpts from the book entitled:"Guidance for dialogue between Christians and Muslims" ([xi]) issued by the Vatican in 1969, afterthe Second Vatican Council four years:q there are two of them to be during the dialogue: to be honest, and to emphasize Christianityaccording to the demand of the Church. (And the requirement of the church has become known).q The most dangerous thing that can stop the interview: to discover the intention of theinterlocutor in Tnasirh, and if what has been ruled out of this situation between the Catholic andnon-Catholic, it did not rule out yet between the Christian and Muslim. If the question of theinterlocutor in this dialogue will we stop immediately, and this pause does not absolve us to

confirm our positions clearly.q dialogue will lose all meaning if the Christian conceal or reducing the value of beliefs that differwith the Koran.q should avoid entering into discussions about what is contained in the Qur'an on Christ andChristianity, but leave Muslim wondering about at will, we must remember that we accept themystery of Christ is the source of our faith.q of the most important obstacles to dialogue what we have done in the past against Islam andMuslims (any of the Ombudsman and the genocidal wars) and the bitterness returned to therevival currently, has now been added the question of Israel and the attitude of the west, and weas Christians know what is in our case this issue. We must always looking for a humanitarian;especially that the solution to this problem is not in our hands.q is not enough that the closer we get from the Muslims; but must reach the degree of respect forIslam that represents the value of high human and progress in the religious development foridolatrous.

q taking into account the Muslim misunderstanding of the Christian doctrine that the termscontained in the Koran about Christianity distorted, they deny the Trinity, the incarnation of Godin Christ, and no dialogue in this area will face failure unless he changed the Muslim position.q in any dialogue must be a Christian to convince the Muslim that Christianity is based onmonotheism and not discuss any details, what words to say to justify the doctrine of the Christian(Trinitarian) will not be able to convince the Muslim who believes in the Trinity is not onlyprejudice to the standardization, based on this to the Al-Tawhid (Say: God is the One, Allah, theEternal, no evidence has been born, and not like unto Him)q the need to separate Christianity itself on the Western world and his anti-colonial and hisMuslim should not forget that after ..


5/6

q based on the dialogue of Christians is to separate what is religious and secular than in theprevious positions of the Church and the West from Islam and Muslims and the search forcommon points.q is still a Muslim because of doubts about the intentions of the Christian, the most difficult pointin the dialogue, so it should not be a Christian to express his indifference to do so, but he has tolisten to points of objection with the attachment in his heart all the beliefs of the Church.q should rely on planting culture, and should not overlook the role played by the West in the thirdworld to change civilization.q I have already for such a dialogue between Arabs, Christians and Muslims that began in thepast, Damascus (eighteenth century), Cordova (twelfth century), and the nearest of us in theMiddle East (nineteenth century), which still continues, and we hope to increase in the every placewhere Christianity and Islam, will never stop to confirm the importance of cultural dialogue - (ofcourse, as an input for the purpose of baptism)!q to be the participation of all Christians in this dialogue and not those who work in the churchalone.

# # #

In a book issued by the Apostolic Exhortation of Pope John Paul II in December 1984 on

"Reconciliation and penance in the mission of the Church today" ([xii]), a letter is located in theone hundred and twenty-eight pages, composed of three parts; we read in the first chapter of PartIII the subject of "dialogue", is item No. 25, located in the six pages where we read:q The dialogue for the Catholic Church is a tool, namely: a way to do work in the world today.q The Second Vatican Council had pointed out that the church is a sign of this brotherhood, whichmakes possible an open dialogue and greater force, by virtue of the message that is characterizedby: the lighting of the universe all the Gospel, and standardization of human beings in the spirit ofone.q has singled out our predecessor Paul VI Department of dialogue is an important mission of theAlambdup the words "church", and described the dialog and select a specific significance as itsaid, "It is a dialogue of salvation", and does the promise of salvation and baptism.q The Church used to improve the dialogue as a way to get people to recant and repent, andthrough the renewal of their consciences and their lives profoundly renewed, in the light of themystery of redemption and salvation of Christ and the two wins Oklhma church service.

q The dialogue aimed at the correct permission in the first place to renew each individual;mystical apostasy and repentance with respect for the conscience, depending on the patient andcareful, and progress step by step, as required under the conditions of people in our time.q The dialogue of reconciliation, which is committed by the Church, especially through the activityof the Holy See and its various organs, a complex dialogue accurately. It can be said: The HolySee seeks to intervene with the rulers of the people and officials from various international forumsand join them in the dialogue or to urge them to dialogue in the interest of reconciliation, thechurch amid numerous conflicts.

.Google Top of Form

arUTF-8 ar|en

Substa

:


6/6

]

Bottom of Form

:

Compared With a Systematic Dialogue Between the Islamic and Christian)

Documents

Transcript of Compared With a Systematic Dialogue Between the Islamic and Christian)