Company website presentation april 2014

Company OverviewApril 2014

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this presentation that address activities, events or developments that Antero Resources Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company” or “Antero”) expects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “foresee,” “should,” “would,” “could,” or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. However, the absence of these words does not mean that the statements are not forward-looking. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, forward-looking statements contained in this presentation specifically include estimates of the Company’s reserves, expectations of plans, strategies, objectives and anticipated financial and operating results of the Company, including as to the Company’s drilling program, production, hedging activities, capital expenditure levels and other guidance included in this presentation. These statements are based on certain assumptions made by the Company based on management’s experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, anticipated future developments and other factors believed to be appropriate. Such statements are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the control of the Company, which may cause actual results to differ materially from those implied or expressed by the forward-looking statements. These include the factors discussed or referenced under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and in the Company’s subsequent filings with the SEC.

The Company cautions you that these forward-looking statements are subject to all of the risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control, incident to the exploration for and development, production, gathering and sale of natural gas and oil. These risks include, but are not limited to, commodity price volatility, inflation, lack of availability of drilling and production equipment and services, environmental risks, drilling and other operating risks, regulatory changes, the uncertainty inherent in estimating natural gas and oil reserves and in projecting future rates of production, cash flow and access to capital, the timing of development expenditures, and the other risks described under the heading “Risk Factors” in the Registration Statement and in the Company’s subsequent filings with the SEC.

Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made and the Company undertakes no obligation to correct or update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.

1

ANTERO: A “PURE PLAY” ON THE MARCELLUS / UTICA● Marcellus is one of the largest gas fields in the world today− Largest gas field in the U.S.– Industry production of approximately 14 Bcf/d today

● Antero has 35 Tcfe of fully engineered and audited 3P reserves primarily in Marcellus and Utica Shales

Critical Mass In Two World Class Shale Plays

● 159% Appalachian production CAGR for 2010 to 2013● Most active driller in Appalachia – 20 rigs running− Most active driller in Marcellus Shale – 15 rigs running− 3rd most active driller in the Utica Shale – 5 rigs running

Market Leading Growth

● Low development cost leader: $1.03/Mcfe(1)

● Industry leading growth-adjusted recycle ratio: 5.4x(1)

● Top quartile return on productive capital: 26% for 2014E

Industry Leading Capital Efficiency and Recycle Ratio

● 1.8 Bcf/d of firm processing capacity as of 2Q 2015 and average 2.6 Bcf/d of firm gas takeaway commitment in 2016

● Liquids expected to grow from 10% of fourth quarter 2013 production to ~ 16% in 2014 due to focus on liquids-rich development

Significant Emphasis on Liquids Processing and

Takeaway Capacity

● ~$1.2 billion pro forma available liquidity with current $1.5 billion in bank commitments(2)

● 1.5 Tcfe hedged through 2019 at an average index price of $4.58/MMBtu and $96.54/Bbl

Liquidity and Hedge Position Support High

Growth Story

● Over 30 years as a team (over 20 years in unconventional)● “Shale Pioneers” – early mover and driller of over 500 horizontal shale

wells in the Barnett, Woodford, Marcellus and Utica Shales

Outstanding Management Team

21. Three year average through 2013; pro forma for Arkoma and Piceance divestitures.2. See page 26 for the derivation of 12/31/2013 liquidity.

UPPER DEVONIAN SHALE

Net Proved Reserves(1) 44 BcfeNet 3P Reserves (1) 4.2 TcfePre-Tax 3P PV-10(1) NM% Liquids – Net 3P 7%4Q 2013 Net Production 3 MMcfe/dUndrilled 3P Locations(3) 1,089

C

PREMIER UNCONVENTIONAL RESOURCE PLATFORM

1. Proved, probable, and possible reserves as of December 31, 2013, in ethane rejection using SEC methodology and SEC pricing. Evaluations prepared by our internal reserve engineers and audited by DeGolyer & MacNaughton (D&M). Pre-Tax 3P PV-10 is a non-GAAP financial measure.

2. All net acres allocated to the Dry Gas Utica and Upper Devonian Shale are included among the net acres allocated to the Marcellus Shale as they are stacked pay formations attributable to the same leasehold.

3. Gross undrilled locations as of 3/31/2014.

TOTAL – 12/31/13 RESERVES(1)

In Ethane RejectionNet Proved Reserves(1) 7.6 TcfeNet 3P Reserves(1) 35.0 TcfePre-Tax 3P PV-10(1) $20,362 MM

Net 3P Liquids 902 MMBbls% Liquids – Net 3P 15%4Q 2013 Net Production 678 MMcfe/d- 4Q 2013 Net Liquids 11,190 Bbl/dNet Acres(2) 464,000Undrilled 3P Locations(3) 4,843

MARCELLUS SHALE

Net Proved Reserves(1) 7.2 TcfeNet 3P Reserves (1) 25.0 TcfePre-Tax 3P PV-10(1) $15,729 MM% Liquids – Net 3P 17%4Q 2013 Net Production 621 MMcfe/dUndrilled 3P Locations(3) 3,004

• 100% operated

• Stable acreage base− Marcellus Shale: 51% HBP, with additional 21%

not expiring for 5+ years− Utica Shale: 20% HBP, with additional 79% not

expiring for 5+ years

• Portfolio flexibility across dry gas to liquids-rich and condensate windows

• Significant investment in midstream infrastructure and secured takeaway capacity

• Financial flexibility to pursue planned 2014 and 2015 development drilling activities

• Full scale development underway− 20 rigs currently operating

A

UTICA SHALE – LIQUIDS-RICH

Net Proved Reserves(1) 362 BcfeNet 3P Reserves (1) 5.8 TcfePre-Tax 3P PV-10(1) $4,666 MM % Liquids – Net 3P 15%4Q 2013 Net Production 54 MMcfe/dUndrilled 3P Locations(3) 750

B

3

AC

B

“Pure Play” Appalachian-Focused Shale Company

UTICA SHALE – DRY GAS

Net Acres(2) 128,000Net Resource 7 to 11 TcfUndrilled Locations 1,080

D

D

Material Commodity Hedge Value

• 1.5 Tcfe hedged from 1/1/2014 through 12/31/2019 at an average index price of $4.58/MMBtu and $96.54/Bbl

• ~ $550 million mark-to-market hedge value as of 4/13/2014

• ~ 56% hedged through NYMEX; 44% hedged through regional hubs

INTEGRATED RESERVES, FIRM PROCESSING & FIRM GAS & NGL TAKEAWAY

41. Antero firm commitment average for 2016 as of 4/13/2014.

Utica Shale● 5 Rigs Running● 21 Horizontal Producing Wells● 750 Undrilled 3P Locations● 1,080 Undrilled Resource Locations● 600 MMcf/d Firm Processing● 54 MMcfe/d 4Q 2013 Net Production

Marcellus Shale● 15 Rigs Running● 245 Horizontal Producing Wells● 3,004 Undrilled Marcellus 3P Locations● 1,089 Undrilled Upper Devonian 3P Locations● 1.2 Bcf/d Firm Processing● 624 MMcfe/d 4Q 2013 Net Production

30 MBbl/d EthaneAscent Cracker (Pending FID)

Firm Commitment Takeaway(1)

01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,0007,0008,0009,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Woodford Piceance Marcellus Utica(3)

87 235680 1,141

3,231

5,0174,283

7,632

(4) (4)

Sold Woodford and Piceance

5

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014E

Woodford Piceance Marcellus Utica

6 31 87 105 133244

334

522

(5)

950

AVERAGE NET DAILY PRODUCTION (MMcfe/d)NET PROVED SEC RESERVES (Bcfe)(2)

193

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

200

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014E

Woodford Piceance Marcellus Utica

85 96

126

18

66

91

119

162

(4)

1. CAGR = Compound Annual Growth Rate.2. Proved reserves for 2006, 2007, and 2008 represent previously effective SEC methodology. 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 proved reserves based on current SEC reserve methodology and SEC pricing and

are audited by independent third-party engineers. 3. Includes Upper Devonian Shale proved reserves (10 Bcfe in 2012 and 44 Bcfe in 2013). 4. 2012 and 2013 proved reserves are both in ethane rejection mode.5. Per Company press release dated January 29, 2014; production mid-point of 925-975 MMcfe/d guidance.6. Per First Call estimate as of 4/13/2014.

FinancialCrisis

STRONG TRACK RECORD OF GROWTH

OPERATED GROSS WELLS SPUD

Sold Woodford and Piceance

EBITDAX ($MM)

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014E

Discontinued Operations Continuing Operations

$0$60

$209 $201 $198$341

$434

$649

$1,260

(6)

80% Growth

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00$0.89 $1.15

$2.47 $2.50 $2.60$2.94 $3.20 $3.27 $3.51 $3.65 $3.66 $3.70

$3.75 $3.80 $3.81 $4.13 $4.25 $4.66$5.05

$5.37 $5.49

$0.00

$1.00

$2.00

$3.00

$4.00

$5.00

$6.00

$7.00

665817

664858

93%

59%

26% 18% 0

200

400

600

800

1000

0%

50%

100%

Highly-RichGas/

Condensate

Highly-RichGas

Rich Gas Dry Gas

Tota

l 3P

Loca

tions

RO

R

Locations ROR

MULTI-YEAR DRILLING INVENTORY SUPPORTS LOW RISK, HIGH RETURN GROWTH PROFILE

Large Inventory of Low Breakeven Projects(3)

1. Well economics based on strip pricing as of 3/31/2014. 2. A portion of these locations do not assume SSL completions.3. Source: Credit Suisse report dated January 2014 – Break even price for 15% after tax rate-of-return; assumes $90.00/Bbl WTI.4. 3-year NYMEX STRIP as of 4/13/2014.

3 Yr Strip - $4.36/MMBtu(4)

665 Locations

1,481Locations359

Locations

858Locations

$ / M

MB

tu N

YMEX

(Gas

)

180Locations

6

MARCELLUS SSL WELL ECONOMICS(1)(2) UTICA WELL ECONOMICS(1)

193

75

91

180211

29%

111%

173%

103%68%

0

50

100

150

200

250

0%

50%

100%

150%

200%

Condensate Highly-RichGas/

Condensate

Highly-RichGas

Rich Gas Dry Gas

Tota

l 3P

Loca

tions

RO

R

Locations ROR

1,000

71% of Marcellus locations are processable (1100-plus Btu) 72% of Utica locations are processable (1100-plus Btu)

`

>2,650 Antero Liquids-Rich Locations

0.0x

2.0x

4.0x

6.0x

8.0x

5.4x

2.7x2.9x2.3x

$0.00

$1.00

$2.00

$3.00

$4.00

$1.03 $1.14 $1.41 $1.57 $1.71

Other Peers

LOW DEVELOPMENT COST DRIVES BEST IN CLASS RECYCLE RATIOS

7

Source: Proved developed F&D research prepared by JP Morgan Research report dated 07/22/2013. Defined as total drilling and completion capital expenditures for the period divided by PDP and PDNP volumes added after adding back production for the period. Includes all drilling and completion costs but excludes land and acquisition costs for all companies. 1. Antero internal estimate using JP Morgan development cost methodology; excludes Arkoma and Piceance operations.2. Antero estimate based on public information; includes Arkoma and Piceance operations.

3-Year All-in Development Costs ($/Mcfe) through 2012

Antero Appalachia-Focused Peers

Source: Wall Street research. Defined as 2011-2013 average (Cash Operating Netback / PD F&D costs) x (1 + 2013-2015 consensus production CAGR). PD F&D Costs defined as total drilling and completion capital expenditures for the period divided by PDP and PDNP volumes added after adding back production for the period per JP Morgan analysis. Includes all drilling and completion costs but excludes land and acquisition costs for all companies.1. Antero data pro forma for Woodford and Piceance divestitures.

Antero Appalachia-Focused Peers

3-Year Average Growth – Adjusted Recycle Ratio through 2013

$/Mcfe

Other Peers

INTEGRATED FIRM PROCESSING & GAS TAKEAWAY

Infrastructure and commitments in place to handle strong natural gas, NGL and oil production growth

– Portfolio of firm transportation and sales and West Virginia and Ohio location minimizes basis risk

8

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

(MM

cf/d

)

Sherwood I Sherwood II Sherwood III Sherwood IV Sherwood V Sherwood VI

Seneca I Seneca II Seneca III Seneca IV

Total Capacity 1,750

Marcellus

Utica

Sherwood I

Sherwood II

Sherwood III

Seneca I

Seneca IISeneca III

Growing Processing Capacity

Sherwood V

Seneca IV

Appalachian Firm Transportation/Sales Commitment by Operator

Sherwood IV

Source: Company presentations, press releases.

0500

1,0001,5002,0002,5003,000

RRC EQT COG CNX CHK TLM STO SWN WPX RDS APC NFG

Bcf

/d

Firm Sales Firm Transportation

(1)AR

Sherwood VI

Firm Gas Takeaway(1)


-$2.00

-$1.50

-$1.00

-$0.50

$0.00

$0.502014 2015 2016Appalachian Basis to NYMEX(2)

LONG HAUL PIPELINE & TRANSPORTATION NETWORK

9

Antero has a leading firm transportation capacity position and is well-positioned in the southern portion of the Marcellus and Utica Shale from a gas takeaway perspective

Note: Antero firm transportation and firm sales positions listed by pipeline in color-coded boxes. 1. Antero firm transport average for 2016 as of 4/13/2014. See Page 31 for timing of firm transportation graph. 2. Basis data from Wells Fargo daily indications and various private quotes as of 4/13/2014.

(1)

TCOBasis to NYMEXCurrent 2016-$0.11 -$0.36

Dom SouthBasis to NYMEXCurrent 2016-$0.54 -$0.79

LeidyBasis to NYMEXCurrent 2016-$1.15 -$1.71

CGTLABasis to NYMEXCurrent 2016-$0.06 -$0.10

ChicagoBasis to NYMEXCurrent 2016+$0.07 -$0.07

TCO

Dom South

TETCO M2

Leidy

Chicago

2013 % of Production Sold

NYMEX 6%

TCO 67%

Dom South 22%

TETCO M2 5%

+

CGTLA

/Other

All-in Firm Transportation Costs(1)

$0.14 $0.17 $0.22 $0.31 $0.11

$0.14 $0.10 $0.11

$0.00

$0.10

$0.20

$0.30

$0.40

$0.50

2013A 2014E 2015E 2016E

($/M

cf)

Wtd. Avg. FT Demand ($/Mcf) Wtd. Avg. FT Commodity/Fuel ($/Mcf)

Appalachia 28%

Gulf Coast 49%

Midwest 23%

2016 FirmTransportation(1)(2)

FIRM TRANSPORTATION REDUCES APPALACHIAN BASIS EXPOSURE

Appalachia 49%

Gulf Coast 51%

2013 FirmTransportation(1)(2)

2013 Firm Transportation – 647 MMcf/dAverage All-in FT Cost $0.25/Mcf

2016 Firm Transportation – 2.6 Bcf/dAverage All-in FT Cost $0.42/Mcf

+ $0.11/Mcf

10

Antero’s future firm transportation portfolio introduces more exposure to Gulf Coast and Midwest pricing, with little incremental cost, assuming full utilization

Included in cash production expense

(fixed cost)

1. Assumes full utilization of firm transportation capacity.2. Represents accessible firm transportation and sales agreements.

Included in cash production expense

(variable cost)$0.25$0.31 $0.32

$0.42

2016 BasisTCO – $(0.36)/MMBtu

DOM S – $(0.79)/MMBtu2016 Basis

Chicago – $(0.07)/MMBtu

2016 BasisCGTLA – $(0.10)/MMBtu

729 650 643 780 710 468

$4.92$4.80 $4.71

$4.33 $4.60 $4.41

$4.68 $4.32 $4.19 $4.26 $4.40 $4.55

$0.00

$1.00

$2.00

$3.00

$4.00

$5.00

$6.00

$7.00

0

200

400

600

800

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

BBtu/d

11%17%

16%

54%

2%NYMEX

CGTLA

Dom South

TCOChicago

SIGNIFICANT LONG-TERM COMMODITY HEDGE POSITION

11

% HEDGE VOLUMES BY INDEX – 4/13/2014

Average Index Hedge Price ($/MMBtu)(1)Hedged Volume NYMEX Strip (4/13/2014) ($/MMBtu)

NATURAL GAS HEDGES – 4/13/2014

1. Reflects weighted average index price per annum based on volumes hedged and 6:1 gas to oil ratio. Antero has hedged ~3,000 Bbl/d for 2014, WTI hedges comprise ~1% of overall hedge book.

~$550 million mark-to-market unrealized gain as of April 13, 2014 1.5 Tcfe hedged from January 1, 2014 through year-end 2019

2014E REALIZATIONS

Ethane

Propane

Iso Butane

Normal Butane

Natural Gasoline

Total $53.84 per Bbl55% of WTI Strip(3)

2014E NGL Y-GRADE (C3+) REALIZATIONS

ESTIMATED 2014 NATURAL GAS REALIZATIONS ($/MCF)

$24.04

$6.42$7.73

$14.91

$0.74

121. NYMEX differential represents contractual deduct to NYMEX-based sales and current basis differentials in the over-the-counter futures market.2. Includes firm sales.3. Based on current strip pricing as of 4/13/2014.4. Includes natural gas hedges.

2014 Hedged Volumes729 MMcfe/d

Region2014E

% SalesAverage

NYMEX Price(3)Average

Differential(2),(3)Average

BTU UpgradeEstimated

Hedge Gain(3)Average 2014E

Realized Gas Price(4)

Average Premium / (Discount)

Appalachia 82% $4.70 $(0.38) $0.42 $0.07 $4.82 $0.12Gulf Coast(1) 11% $4.70 $(0.25) $0.42 $0.01 $4.88 $0.18Chicago 8% $4.70 $0.12 $0.42 $0.02 $5.27 $0.57Total Wtd. Avg. 100% $4.70 $(0.32) $0.42 $0.10 $4.90 $0.20

Tetco M228%

Chicago20%

DOM S 9%NYMEX 9%

TCO34%

2014 HEDGED VOLUMES – BY INDEX

$0.10 – premium to NYMEX (high end of current guidance)

% of C3+ BblEthane 2%Propane 50%Iso Butane 10%Normal Butane 16%Natural Gasoline 22%

+

INTEGRATED PORTFOLIO OF NGL TAKEAWAY& MARKETS

13

In addition to local markets, Antero has entered into a number of agreements to diversify its NGL marketing: – 51,500 Bbl/d NGL transport,

terminaling and storage agreement with Mariner East II to export ethane, propane and butane –expected in service at Marcus Hook in 2016, subject to regulatory authorization

– 30,000 Bbl/d ethane supply agreement with Braskem Ascent ethane cracker; pending Final Investment Decision (FID)

– 20,000 Bbl/d of ethane firm transport on ATEX pipeline to Mont Belvieu now in service

Firm Liquids Takeaway(1)

Cadiz, OH Houston, PA

Export Market● 12,000 Bbl/d Butane● 28,000 Bbl/d Propane● 11,500 Bbl/d Ethane


30 MBbl/d EthaneAscent Cracker (Pending FID)

$0.00

$1.00

$2.00

$3.00

$4.00

$5.00

$6.00

$7.00

AR 2013 AR 2014E RRC 2013 EQT 2013 COG 2013 RICE 2013

$/M

cfe

LOE Production Taxes GPT G&A Hedge Gain E&P EBITDAX before Hedge Gain 4-year Avg. Drill-bit F&D ($/Mcfe)

$5.17

$4.11

EBITDAX $3.39/Mcfe EBITDAX

$2.92/Mcfe

$4.38

EBITDAX$2.98/Mcfe

$4.91

$5.71

Drill-bitF&D

$0.35/Mcfe

Drill-bitF&D

$0.35/Mcfe

Drill-bitF&D

$0.83/Mcfe

EBITDAX$3.25/Mcfe

EBITDAX $3.81/Mcfe

Drill-bitF&D

$0.73/Mcfe

EBITDAX$2.59/Mcfe

Drill-bitF&D

$0.90/Mcfe

$4.01

Drill-bitF&D

$0.65/Mcfe

14

1. Includes realized hedge gains only; unrealized hedge gains excluded.2. Operating costs include lease operating expenses, production taxes, gathering processing and firm transport costs and general and administrative costs. 3. 4-year proved reserve average drill-bit F&D from 2010-2013. Calculation = (Development costs + exploration costs ) / Total reserves added (2013 ending reserves – 2010 beginning reserves + 4–year reserve

sales – 4-year reserve purchases + 4-year accumulated production). Peer 4 based on 3-year data only.4. Based on mid-point of 2014E guidance.5. Based on 3-year average only due to lack of 4-year data.

BIGGEST “BANG FOR THE BUCK” Antero has the highest price realizations and operating cash flow per Mcfe combined with the lowest all-in F&D cost among its

Appalachian peers− Results in highest recycle ratio, or ability to grow production and reserves with cash flow− Increase in realizations and EBITDAX/Mcfe for 2014E driven by a 4x increase in liquids production to ≈ 25,000 Bbl/d

Antero

2013 Price Realization(1) & EBITDAX Per Unit(2) vs F&D(3)

Including Realized Hedge Gains

Peer 1 Peer 2 Peer 3 Peer 4(5)(4)

ASSET OVERVIEW

15

WORLD CLASS POSITION IN THE CORE OF THE MARCELLUS AND UTICA LIQUIDS-RICH FAIRWAYS

Source: Company presentations and press releases.

Utica Shale Core Area

Marcellus Shale

Southwestern & Northeastern

Core Areas

Upper Devonian Shale Resource

Overlies Marcellus Acreage

16

ANTERO LIQUIDS-RICH UTICA SHALE

108,000 Net Acres21 Horizontals Completed5 Rigs Currently Running

ANTERO MARCELLUS SHALE SW PA

25,000 Net Acres2 Horizontals Completed

Strong Results

ANTERO MARCELLUS SHALE NW WV

331,000 Net Acres(Primarily Liquids-Rich Fairway)

243 Horizontals Completed15 Rigs Currently Running

Utica ShaleLiquids-Rich

Fairway

Utica Shale Dry Gas

Resource Underlies Marcellus Acreage

Marcellus Shale Liquids-Rich

Fairway

WORLD CLASS MARCELLUS SHALE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTAntero Has Delineated And De-Risked Its Large Scale Acreage Position

100% operated 356,000 net acres in

Southwestern Core– 51% HBP with additional

21% not expiring for 5+ years 245 horizontal wells completed

and online– Laterals average 7,100’– 100% drilling success rate

Net production of 621 MMcfe/d in 4Q 2013, including 8,900 Bbl/d of liquids

3,004 future drilling locations in the Marcellus (71% are processable)

Operating 15 drilling rigs including 4 shallow rigs

25.0 Tcfe of net 3P (17% liquids), includes 7.2 Tcfe of proved reserves (in ethane rejection)

17

Highly-Rich Gas101,000 Net Acres

817 Gross Locations

Rich Gas88,000 Net Acres

664 Gross Locations

Dry Gas104,000 Net Acres

858 Gross Locations

Highly-Rich/Condensate63,000 Net Acres

665 Gross Locations

MOORE UNIT30-Day Rate

1H: 10.3 MMcfe/d 2H: 10.3 MMcfe/d

(20% liquids)

MHR WEESE UNIT30-Day Rate

4-well average9.3 MMcfe/d (31% liquids)

CHK HADLEY UNIT24-Hour IP

9.1 MMcfe/d(32% liquids)

EQT PENN 15 UNIT30-Day Rate

5-well average9.3 MMcfe/d (26% liquids)

CONSTABLE UNIT30-Day Rate

1H: 14.3 MMcfe/d (26% liquids)

142 Horizontals Completed30-Day Rate

10.3 Bcf average EUR8.1 MMcf/d

6,915’ average lateral length

PRUNTY UNIT30-Day Rate

1H: 11.1 MMcfe/d(27% liquids)

HINTERER UNIT30-Day Rate


RUTH UNIT30-Day Rate


SherwoodProcessing

Plant

EQT30-Day Rate

12 Recent Wells9.2 MMcfe/d (20% Liquids)

Source: Company presentations and press releases. Antero acreage position reflects tax districts in which greater than 3,000 net acres are held. Note: Rates in ethane rejection.

BLANCHE UNIT30-Day Rate

1H: 9.7 MMcfe/d(30% liquids)

DOTSON UNIT30-Day Rate

1H: 12.4 MMcfe/d2H: 11.8 MMcfe/d

(26% liquids)

MARCELLUS – SIMPLE STRUCTURE

18

Several regional anticlines in core area− Predictable “layer cake” geology− No faults at Marcellus level

• Over 1.7 million feet (330 miles) drilled horizontally without crossing a fault

− 3-D seismic not required to guide horizontal wells

Regional East-West seismic line shows gentle structure at Marcellus level

Allegheny Front and complex structure located many miles east of core area

Favorable geology allows for longer laterals

Average Marcellus Lateral Lengths

7,100

4,800 4,500 4,100

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

Antero EQT RRC COG

Feet

Source: Company presentations.

Wolf SummitArches ForkBig Moses

MarcellusOnondaga

BensonRhinestreet

Profile along regional seismic line (time)W E

Regional Seismic Line

No Data

Tully

100’ Contours Top Marcellus

0.0

3.0

6.0

9.0

12.0

15.0

0.0

3.0

6.0

9.0

12.0

15.0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Cum

ulat

ive

Bcf

MM

cf/d

Production Year

Antero Non-SSL Type Curve Actual Non-SSL ProductionNon-SSL Type Curve Cumulative Production 1.7 Bcf/1,000' SSL Type CurveSSL Actual Production

0

4

8

12

16

20

MM

cf/d

Production from All Wells 2009 - 2013

Antero has over four years of production history to support its 1.5 Bcf/1,000’ type curve (non-SSL) Antero’s SSL type curve has been increased to 1.7 Bcf/1,000’ with only 10% to 15% higher well costs Lack of faulting and contiguous acreage position allows for drilling of long laterals ~ 7,100’− Drives down costs per 1,000’ of lateral resulting in best in class development costs

ANTERO’S MARCELLUS SHALE TYPE CURVE SUPPORT

1. 245 Antero Marcellus wells normalized to time zero, production for each well normalized to 7,000’ lateral length.2. 40 Antero Marcellus SSL wells normalized to time zero, production for each well normalized to 7,000’ lateral length.

Marcellus Type Curve – Normalized to 7,000’ Lateral(1)

19

24-Hour Peak Rate

30-Day Avg. Rate

90-Day Avg. Rate

180-Day Avg. Rate

One-Year Avg. Rate

Two-Year Avg. Rate

Three-YearAvg. Rate

Wellhead (MMcf/d) 14.3 8.3 6.4 5.4 4.3 3.1 2.3# of wells 245 242 225 209 140 67 34

EURs Increase With Lateral Length Well Cost / 1,000’ Decreases with Lateral Length Wellhead 30-day Rates - 242 Wells

Average 30-Day Rate – 8.3 MMcf/d

(2)

0

5

10

15

20

25

2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000

EUR

, BC

F

Lateral Length, ft

$0.6

$0.8

$1.0

$1.2

$1.4

$1.6

$1.8

2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000

$MM

/ 1,

000'

Lateral length, ft

MARCELLUS SINGLE WELL ECONOMICS – IN ETHANE REJECTION

20

DRY GAS LOCATIONS RICH GAS LOCATIONS

HIGHLY RICH GAS

LOCATIONS

Assumptions 3/31/2014 Strip Pricing

NYMEX($/MMBtu)

WTI($/Bbl)

C3+ NGL(2)

($/Bbl)

2014 $4.44 $98 $53

2015 $4.18 $90 $50

2016 $4.13 $84 $47

2017 $4.16 $81 $45

2018+ $4.28 $80 $44

Marcellus SSL Well Economics and Total Gross Locations(1)

ClassificationHighly-Rich Gas/

CondensateHighly-Rich

Gas Rich Gas Dry GasBTU Range 1275-1350 1200-1275 1100-1200 <1100Modeled BTU 1313 1250 1150 1050EUR (Bcfe): 16.1 14.6 13.1 11.9EUR (MMBoe): 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.0% Liquids: 33% 24% 12% 0%Lateral Length (ft): 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000Stage Length (ft): 225 225 225 225Well Cost ($MM): $9.5 $9.5 $9.5 $9.5Bcfe/1,000’: 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7

Pre-Tax NPV10 ($MM): $18.0 $12.5 $4.8 $2.4Pre-Tax ROR: 93% 59% 26% 18%Net F&D ($/Mcfe): $0.69 $0.76 $0.86 $0.94Payout (Years): 1.0 1.4 3.1 4.5

Gross 3P Locations(3): 665 817 664 858

1. Well economics are based on 3/31/2014 strip pricing and $0.17/Mcf firm transportation cost. Well economics includes gathering, compression and processing fees. 2. Pricing for a 1225 BTU y-grade rejection barrel.3. Undeveloped well locations as of 3/31/2014.

665817

664

858

93%

59%

26% 18%0

200

400

600

800

1,000

0%

50%

100%

Highly-Rich Gas/Condensate

Highly-Rich Gas Rich Gas Dry Gas

Tota

l 3P

Loca

tions

RO

R Locations ROR

1,000

10,000

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270

Gas

Pro

duct

ion

(Mcf

e/d)

Days From Peak GasAntero Type Curve SSL Average Wellhead SSL Average Processed

Enhancing Recoveries Shorter stage length (SSL) summary:

– 40 SSL wells completed– 38 SSL wells have at least 30 days

of production history– 150’ to 225’ (SSL) vs. 350’ stages

previously 30% higher 30-day wellhead rate for

first 38 SSL wells vs. the Antero type curve – 25% higher 180-day rate vs. the

non-SSL type curve– Other Marcellus operators have

indicated 20% to 30% improvement in IPs and EURs

The 30-day processed rate for Antero’s first 38 SSL wells has averaged 40% higher than the Antero type curve

Estimated 10% to 15% increase in well costs for SSL completions as compared to non-SSL

21

SHORTER STAGE LENGTHS (“SSL”)– ENHANCING MARCELLUS RECOVERIES

1.5 Bcf/1,000’ Type Curve

Normalized production increase for 40 SSL wells vs. 1.5 Bcf/1,000' Type Curve

SSL vs Non-SSL Wellhead Average Rate Comparison

30-day Rate

90-day Rate

120-day Rate

180-day Rate

SSL Well Count 38 23 19 15SSL Avg. Wellhead Rate – MMcf/d(1) 9.9 7.8 7.6 7.1Wellhead Type Curve – MMcf/d(2) 7.6 6.6 6.2 5.7SSL % Rate Improvement 30% 20% 23% 25%

SSL Avg. Processed Rate – MMcfe/d(1) 11.3 9.0 8.6 8.1Processed Type Curve – MMcfe/d(3) 8.1 7.0 6.6 6.0SSL % Rate Improvement 40% 29% 32% 34%(1) Wellhead condensate production is converted on a 6:1 basis(2) 1.5 Bcf/1,000’ Type Curve(3) 1.5 Bcf/1,000’ Type Curve processed assuming 1225 BTU

LARGE UNBOOKED ANTERO UTICA DRY GAS POSITION

22

128,000 Utica dry gas net acres− 1,080 locations underlying current Marcellus Shale leasehold

in West Virginia and Pennsylvania 7 to 11 Tcf of total resource

− Not included in 35 Tcfe of 3P reserves Expect to drill and complete a Utica Shale dry gas well in the

second half of 2014 Other operators have reported strong Utica Shale dry gas

results including the following wells:

Utica dry gas resource underlies Antero’s Marcellus leasehold in WV / PA

ChesapeakeHubbard BRK #3H

3,550’ LateralIP 11.1 MMcf/d

HessPorterfield 1H-17


GulfportIrons #1-4H


EclipseTippens #6H5,858’ Lateral

IP 30.0 MMcf/d

Magnum HunterStalder #3UH5,050’ Lateral

IP 32.5 MMcf/dAnteroPlanned

Utica Well2H 2014

Well Operator IP(MMcf/d)

Lateral Length (Ft)

Hubbard BRK #3H Chesapeake 11.1 3,550

Porterfield 1H-17 Hess 17.2 5,000

Conner 6H Chevron 25.0 6,451

Tippens #6H Eclipse 30.0 5,858

Irons #1-4H Gulfport 30.3 5,714

Stalder #3UH Magnum Hunter 32.5 5,050

Source: Antero acreage position reflects tax districts in which greater than 3,000 net acres are held.

Magnum HunterUtica Well

Drilling

RangeUtica Well

Drilling

ChevronConner 6H

6,451’ LateralIP 25 MMcf/d

GastarUtica Well

Drilling

Source: Company presentations and press releases. Note: Antero acreage position reflects townships in which greater than 3,000 net acres are held. Note: Third party peak rates assume ethane recovery; Antero 30-day rates in ethane rejection.1. For non-Antero wells, Antero has converted rich gas rates where BTU has been disclosed to NGLs, assuming ethane recovery. Where BTU has not been disclosed, Antero has estimated BTU and gas

composition.

100% operated

108,000 net acres in the core rich gas / condensate window– 20% HBP with additional 79% not expiring

for 5+ years– 75% of acreage has rich gas processing

potential

21 Antero-operated horizontal wells completed and online − 100% drilling success rate

Net production of 54 MMcfe/d in 4Q 2013 including 2,200 Bbl/d of liquids− First production in early August 2013 had

access to Cadiz pipeline and processing− Seneca I processing plant came online in

November 2013 and Seneca II came online in January 2014

− The first 120 MMcf/d compressor station went into service in late January with the second 120 MMcf/d station in late March; a a third is expected in early 3Q 2014

750 future gross drilling locations– Approximately 15% of EUR is liquids in

ethane rejection

Operating 5 rigs including 1 shallow rig

5.8 Tcfe of net 3P (15% liquids), includes 362 Bcfe of proved reserves (in ethane rejection)

EXCITING CORE UTICA SHALE POSITION DELIVERS CONDENSATE AND NGLS

23

Utica Shale Industry Activity(1)

SenecaProcessing

Plant

CadizProcessing

Plant

CHESAPEAKE24-Hour IPBuell #8H

9.5 MMcf/d + 1,425 Bbl/d liquids

GULFPORT24-Hour IP

Boy Scout 1-33H, Ryser 1-25H, Groh 1-12H

Average 5.3 MMcf/d + 675 Bbl/d NGL + 1,411 Bbl/d Oil

REXX24-Hour IP

Guernsey 1H, 2H,Noble 1H

Average 7.9 MMcf/d + 1,192 Bbl/d NGL

+ 502 Bbl/d Oil

NORMAN UNIT 1H30-Day Rate 16.4 MMcfe/d (17% liquids)

YONTZ UNIT 1H30-Day Rate 17.0 MMcfe/d(14% liquids)

RUBEL UNIT30-Day Rate

3 wells average17.3 MMcfe/d(22% liquids)

GULFPORT24-Hour IP

McCort1-28H, 2-28H, Stutzman 1-14H

Average 13.1 MMcf/d + 922 Bbl/d NGL

+ 21 Bbl/d Oil

GULFPORT24-Hour IP

Wagner 1-28H, Shugert 1-1H, 1-12H

Average 21.0 MMcf/d + 2,270 Bbl/d NGL

+ 292 Bbl/d Oil

Utica Core Area

WAYNE UNIT 30-Day Rate


GARY UNIT 2H30-Day Rate29.7 MMcfe/d(22% liquids)

Highly-Rich/Cond12,000 Net Acres

75 Gross Locations

Highly-Rich Gas13,000 Net Acres

91 Gross Locations

Rich Gas25,000 Net Acres

180 Gross Locations

Dry Gas28,000 Net Acres

211 Gross Locations

COAL UNIT30-Day Rate

2 wells average16.3 MMcfe/d (50% liquids)

SCHEETZ UNIT30-Day Rate


NEUHART UNIT30-Day Rate16.4 MMcfe/d(56% liquids)

Condensate30,000 Net Acres

193 Gross Locations

DOLLISON UNIT30-Day Rate19.0 MMcfe/d(36% liquids)

UTICA SINGLE WELL ECONOMICS – IN ETHANE REJECTION

24

DRY GAS LOCATIONS RICH GAS LOCATIONS

HIGHLY RICH GAS

LOCATIONS

Assumptions 3/31/2014 Strip Pricing

Utica Well Economics and Gross Locations(1)

Classification CondensateHighly-Rich Gas/

CondensateHighly-Rich

Gas Rich Gas Dry GasBTU Range 1250-1300 1225-1250 1200-1225 1100-1200 <1100Modeled BTU 1275 1235 1215 1175EUR (Bcfe): 7.4 13.3 19.9 18.5 16.6EUR (MMBoe): 1.2 2.2 3.3 3.1 2.8% Liquids 35% 26% 21% 14% 0%Lateral Length (ft): 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000Stage Length (ft): 240 240 240 240 240Well Cost ($MM): $11.0 $11.0 $11.0 $11.0 $11.0Bcfe/1,000’: 1.1 1.9 2.8 2.6 2.4

Pre-Tax NPV10 ($MM): $5.7 $16.6 $25.5 $18.7 $13.7Pre-Tax ROR: 29% 111% 173% 103% 68%Net F&D ($/Mcfe): $1.83 $1.02 $0.68 $0.73 $0.82Payout (Years): 2.4 0.8 0.6 0.9 1.2

Gross 3P Locations(3): 193 75 91 180 211

1. Well economics are based on 3/31/2014 strip pricing. Includes gathering, compression and processing fees.2. Pricing for a 1225 BTU y-grade rejection barrel.3. Undeveloped well locations as of 3/31/2014. 3P locations representative of BTU regime; EUR and economics within regime will vary based on BTU content.

NYMEX($/MMBtu)

WTI($/Bbl)

C3+ NGL(2)

($/Bbl)

2014 $4.44 $98 $52

2015 $4.18 $90 $49

2016 $4.13 $84 $46

2017 $4.16 $81 $43

2018+ $4.28 $80 $42

193

75

91

180211

29%

111%

173%

103%68%

0

50

100

150

200

250

0%

50%

100%

150%

200%

Condensate Highly-Rich Gas/Condensate

Highly-Rich Gas Rich Gas Dry Gas

Tota

l 3P

Loca

tions

RO

RLocations ROR

LARGE MIDSTREAM FOOTPRINT

25

Ohio River WithdrawalSystem Completed

Antero Midstream estimated cumulative YE 2014 total capital investment in midstream ~ $1.5 billion– Includes gathering lines, compressor

stations and water distribution infrastructureProprietary water sourcing and distribution

system − Improves operational efficiency and reduces

water truck traffic− Cost savings of $600,000 to $800,000 per

well− One of the benefits of a consolidated

acreage position

UticaShale

MarcellusShale

Projected Midstream Infrastructure(1)

Marcellus Shale

Utica Shale Total

YE 2014E Cumulative Gathering / Compression Capex ($MM) $750 $350 $1,100Gathering Pipelines (Miles) 192 92 284Compression Capacity (MMcf/d) 410 120 530

YE 2014 Cumulative Water System Capex ($MM) $300 $100 $400Water Pipeline (Miles) 122 48 170Water Storage Facilities 31 16 47

YE 2014E Total Midstream ($MM) $1,050 $450 $1,500

Note: Antero acreage position reflects tax districts in which greater than 3,000 net acres are owned.1. Represents inception to date actuals as of 12/31/2013 and 2014 guidance.

CAPITALIZATION

1. Equity valuation based on 262.0 million shares outstanding and a share price of $63.22 as of 4/13/2014. Enterprise value includes net debt.2. Pro forma interest expense adjusted for $1,578 million net proceeds from IPO priced on 10/14/2013 and $1,000 million 5.375% Senior Notes priced on 10/24/2013 net of fees; assumes $525 million

9.375% Senior Notes, $25 million 9.00% Senior Note and $140 million 7.25% Senior Notes repaid at beginning of year along with residual cash used to repay bank debt.3. Lender commitments under the facility reduced to $1.5 billion from $1.75 billion on 10/21/2013; commitments can be expanded to the full $2.0 billion borrowing base upon bank approval.

PRO FORMA CAPITALIZATION

($ in millions) 12/31/2013(PF Financing)

12/31/2013 (2)

Cash $17 $17

Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility 288 2887.25% Senior Notes Due 2019 260 2606.00% Senior Notes Due 2020 525 5255.375% Senior Notes Due 2021 1,000 1,000Net Unamortized Premium 6 6Total Debt $2,079 $2,079

Net Debt $2,062 $2,062

Shareholders' Equity $3,599 $3,599Net Book Capitalization $5,660 $5,660

Enterprise Value(1) $18,816 $18,625

Financial & Operating StatisticsLTM EBITDAX $649 $649

LTM Interest Expense(2) $137 $106

Proved Reserves (Bcfe) (12/31/2013) 7,632 7,632

Proved Developed Reserves (Bcfe) (12/31/2013) 2,023 2,023

Credit Statistics

Net Debt / LTM EBITDAX 3.2x 3.2xLTM EBITDAX / Interest Expense 4.8x 6.1xNet Debt / Net Book Capitalization 36.4% 36.4%Net Debt / Proved Developed Reserves ($/Mcfe) $1.02 $1.02Net Debt / Proved Reserves ($/Mcfe) $0.27 $0.27

LiquidityCredit Facility Commitments(3) $1,500 $1,500 Less: Borrowings (288) (288)Less: Letters of Credit (32) (32)Plus: Cash 17 17

Liquidity (Credit Facility + Cash) $1,197 $1,197

26

Keys to Execution

Local Presence

Antero has more than 4,500 contract employees working full-time for Antero in West Virginia. 79% of these employees are West Virginia residents.

Land office in Ellenboro, WV Recently moved into new 50,000 square foot district office in Bridgeport, WV 116 of Antero’s 284 employees are located in West Virginia and Ohio

Safety & Environmental

Five company safety representatives and 45 safety consultants cover all material field operations 24/7 including drilling, completion, construction and pipelining

23-person company environmental staff plus outside consultants monitor all operations and perform baseline water well testing

Central Fresh Water System & Water Recycling

Numerous sources of water – building central water system to source water forcompletion

Antero recycles over 95% of its flowback water with the remainder injected into disposal wells – no discharge to water treatment plants in West Virginia

Natural Gas Vehicles (NGV)

Antero supported the first natural gas fueling station in West Virginia which recently opened

Antero has 30 NGV trucks and plans to continue to convert its truck fleet to NGV

Pad Impact Mitigation Closed loop mud system – no mud pits Protective liners or mats on all well pads in addition to berms

Natural Gas Powered Drilling Rigs Nine of Antero’s contracted drilling rigs are currently running on natural gas

Green Completion Units All Antero well completions use green completion units for completion flowback,

essentially eliminating methane emissions (full compliance with EPA 2015requirements)

LEED Gold Headquarters Building

Antero’s new corporate headquarters in Denver has been LEED Gold Certified Completion expected by spring of 2014

HEALTH, SAFETY, ENVIRONMENT & COMMUNITYAntero Core Values: Protect Our People, Protect The Environment

Strong West Virginia Presence 79% of Antero Marcellus

employees and contract workers are West Virginia residents

Antero named Business of the Year for 2013 in Harrison County, West Virginia “For outstanding corporate citizenship and community involvement”

Antero representatives recently participated in a ribbon cutting with the Governor of West Virginia for the grand opening of the first natural gas fueling station in the state; Antero supported the station with volume commitments for its NGV truck fleet

27

ANTERO KEY ATTRIBUTES

28

464,000 Net Acres in the Core Marcellus and Utica Shales

“Triple Digit” Historical Production and Reserve Growth

Low Cost Leader / High Return Projects

Significant Processing and Takeaway Capacity Already in Place

Clean Balance Sheet Supports High Growth Story

“Forward Thinking” Management Team with a History of Success

29

APPENDIX

29

OUTSTANDING RESERVE GROWTH

1. 2012 and 2013 reserves in ethane rejection.30

PROVED RESERVE GROWTH(1)

3P RESERVE GROWTH(1)

• Proved PV-10 increased 133% to $7.0 billion (including hedges)

• 3P PV-10 increased 82% to $21.4 billion (including hedges)

• Replaced 1,857% of 2013 production

• All-in finding cost of $0.58/Mcfe

• 2013 “top-down” development cost of $1.25/Mcfe

• 2013 “bottoms-up” development cost of $1.10/Mcfe

• Only 14% of 1P and 58% of 3P locations booked as SSL (1.73 Bcf/1,000’ type curve)

• No Utica Shale WV/PA dry gas reserves booked

4.27.2

0.1

0.4

0

2

4

6

8

10

2012 2013

(Tcfe)

Marcellus Utica

7.6

17.625.0

4.0

5.84.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

2012 2013

(Tcfe)

Marcellus Utica Upper Devonian

Key Drivers

POTENTIAL RESERVE GROWTH DRIVERS

2013 RESERVE UPDATE

• Marcellus SSL completions

• Full scale Utica program

• Utica increased density drilling

• Utica dry gas drilling

• Core acreage acquisitions

Driver 2014 Activity

Complete transition to SSL type curve

4.3

21.6

35.0

• Successful drilling

• SSL results

• Expanded proved footprint

• 79,000 net acres added in 2013

• SSL results

• Utica results

41 wells to be completed; only 21 PUD locations booked as proved at YE 2013

$200 million leasehold budget

Drilling 2 increased density pilots in Utica

Drilling first Utica dry gas well in WV (128,000 net acres WV/PA)

Key Drivers

ANTERO FIRM TRANSPORTATION AND FIRM SALES

31

MMBtu/d

Columbia7/26/2009 – 9/30/2025

Firm Sales #110/1/2011– 10/31/2019

Firm Sales #2

10/1/2011 – 5/31/2017

Firm Sales #3

1/1/2013 – 5/31/2022

Momentum III9/1/2012 – 12/31/2023

EQT8/1/2012 – 12/31/2023

REX/MGT/ANR4/1/2013 – 9/30/2025

Tennessee11/1/2015– 9/30/2025

-

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

1. Gas Equivalent Rate = Shrunk Gas + (NGL + Condensate) converted at 6:1. 2. Average of Antero’s core area wells per BTU regime, in ethane rejection.

ANTERO UTICA SHALE WELLS – 30-DAY RATES

32

Antero’s wells produced against 1,100 psi line pressure until late January 2014 due to lack of compression facilities− First 120 MMcf/d compressor station started up in late January 2014 with a second 120 MMcf/d station starting in

late March 2014Lateral

Well Gas Eq. Rate(1) Wellhead Gas Shrunk Gas NGL Condensate % Total Estimated LengthName County (MMcfe/d) (MMcf/d) (MMcf/d) (Bbl/d) (Bbl/d) Liquids BTU (Feet)

Condensate (1250‐1300 BTU)Scheetz 3H Noble 19.5 10.1 9.3 605 1,105 53% 1290 8,337Coal 2H Noble 16.4 8.8 8.1 492 885 51% 1278 8,036Neuhart 3H Noble 16.4 8.0 7.3 476 1,040 56% 1291 7,425Coal 3H Noble 16.2 8.8 8.1 491 872 50% 1278 7,768Milligan 2H Noble 14.6 7.7 7.0 445 817 52% 1276 5,989Scheetz 2H Noble 13.6 6.9 6.3 413 789 53% 1290 6,197Milligan 3H Noble 12.9 7.6 7.0 444 552 46% 1276 5,267Wayne 2H Noble 12.1 6.5 6.0 367 653 51% 1281 6,094Wayne 3HA Noble 11.0 6.1 5.6 354 540 49% 1272 6,712Wayne 4H Noble 9.2 5.2 4.7 284 452 48% 1265 6,493Milligan 1H Noble 9.1 4.6 4.2 269 538 53% 1276 6,436Miley 2H Noble 9.0 3.8 3.5 213 700 61% 1278 6,153Miley 5HA Noble 5.9 2.7 2.5 161 418 59% 1291 6,296

12.7 6.7 6.1 386 720 52% 1280 6,708

Highly‐Rich Gas / Condensate (1225‐1250 BTU)Dollison 1H Noble 19.0 12.9 12.1 556 596 36% 1238 6,253Rubel 1H Monroe 14.0 11.5 10.8 501 28 23% 1231 6,554

16.5 12.2 11.5 528 312 30% 1235 6,404

Highly‐Rich Gas (1200‐1225 BTU)Gary 2H Monroe 29.7 24.6 23.1 1,023 65 22% 1224 8,882Rubel 2H Monroe 19.2 15.9 15.0 625 64 22% 1217 6,571Rubel 3H Monroe 18.7 15.6 14.7 623 43 21% 1220 6,424

22.5 18.7 17.6 757 57 22% 1220 7,292

Rich Gas (1100‐1200 BTU)Yontz 1H Monroe 17.0 15.2 14.6 392 1 14% 1161 5,115Norman 1H Monroe 16.4 14.3 13.6 461 2 17% 1186 5,498

16.7 14.7 14.1 426 1 15% 1174 5,307

Average ‐ Ethane Rejection(2)


30‐Day Rates ‐ Antero Core Area



CONSIDERABLE RESERVE BASE WITH ETHANE OPTIONALITY 40 year proved reserve life based on 2013E production Reserve base provides significant exposure to liquids-rich projects

– 3P reserves of over 2.2 BBbl of NGLs and condensate in ethane recovery mode; 33% liquids

1. Ethane rejection occurs when ethane is left in the wellhead gas stream as the gas is processed, rather than being separated out and sold as a liquid after fractionation. When ethane is left in the gas stream, the BTU content of the residue gas at the outlet of the processing plant is higher. Producers will elect to “reject” ethane when the price received for the higher BTU residue gas is greater than the price received for the ethane being sold as a liquid after fractionation. When ethane is recovered, the BTU content of the residue gas is lower, but a producer is then able to recover the value of the ethane sold as a separate NGL product.

ETHANE REJECTION(1) ETHANE RECOVERY(1)

33

Marcellus – 25.0 Tcfe

Utica – 5.8 Tcfe

Upper Devonian – 4.2 Tcfe

35.0Tcfe

Gas – 29.6 Tcf

Oil – 91 MMBbls

NGLs – 811 MMBbls

Marcellus – 29.5 Tcfe

Utica – 6.7 Tcfe

Upper Devonian – 4.7 Tcfe

40.8Tcfe

Gas – 27.4 Tcf

Oil – 91 MMBbls

NGLs – 2,151 MMBbls

15%Liquids

33%Liquids

Gas $4.46

Gas$4.19

Gas$4.15

Gas$4.08

$0.00

$1.00

$2.00

$3.00

$4.00

$5.00

$6.00

$7.00

$8.00

$9.00

1050 BTU

$5.15

$6.55

$7.68

$4.46

1150 BTU 1250 BTU 1300 BTU

MARCELLUS SHALE RICH GAS –LIQUIDS AND PROCESSING UPGRADE

1. NGL prices as of 3/18/2014 from IntercontinentalExchange.2. Assumes $4.25/MMBtu NYMEX, $90.00/Bbl WTI and current NGL spot prices. 0.886, 1.972 and 2.632 (ethane rejection) GPMs used, all processing costs, shrink and fuel included. No NYMEX basis

differential assumed.

Current – Ethane Rejection

(1076 BTU)8% shrink

(1109 BTU)12% shrink

(1119 BTU)14% shrink

$/Wellhead Mcf(1)(2)

($/Mcf)

Marcellus Shale rich gas and highly-rich gas acreage provides a significant advantage in well economics – assuming $4.25/MMBtu NYMEX, $90.00/Bbl WTI and current spot NGL pricing(1)

34

+$0.69Upgrade

+$2.08Upgrade

+$3.22Upgrade

Highly-Rich GasDry Gas

NGLs (C3+)$0.96

NGLs (C3+)$2.24

NGLs (C3+)$3.03

Condensate$0.16

Condensate$0.56

Highly-Rich/ CondensateDry Gas

2013 REALIZATIONS

Ethane (C2)

Propane (C3)

Iso Butane (C4)

Normal Butane

Natural Gasoline

Total $52.61 per Bbl54% of WTI(4)

2013 NGL Y-GRADE (C3+) REALIZATIONS

2013 NATURAL GAS REALIZATIONS ($/MCF)

55%

2%

11%

15%

17%

$23.49

$6.27$7.55

$14.57

$0.72

351. NYMEX differential represents contractual deduct to NYMEX-based sales.2. Includes firm sales.3. Price excludes hedges.4. Based on monthly prices through 12/31/2013 WTI.

Antero Barrel

2013 % Sales

Average NYMEX Price

AverageDifferential(2)

AverageBTU Upgrade

Average 2013 Realized Price(3)

Average Premium / (Discount)

TCO 67% $3.65 $(0.06) $0.42 $4.02 $0.37Dominion South 22% $3.65 $(0.41) $0.39 $3.64 $(0.01)NYMEX(1) 6% $3.65 $(0.40) $0.39 $3.65 −TETCO 5% $3.65 $(0.26) $0.41 $3.80 $0.15

Total 100% $3.65 $(0.16) $0.42 $3.90 $0.25

POSITIVE RATINGS MOMENTUMMoody’s / S&P Historical Credit Ratings

“”The positive outlook reflects the potential for a positive rating action ifthe company is able to continue to increase reserves and production inthe Marcellus and Utica shales, increase liquids production, whilecontinuing to improve credit measures.”

- S&P Credit Research, March 2014

“An upgrade could be considered if debt / average daily production issustained below $20,000 per boe and debt / proved-developedreserves is sustained below $8.00 per boe. An upgrade would also becontingent on Antero maintaining unleveraged cash margins greaterthan $25.00 per boe and retained cash flow to debt over 40% as itbuilds out infrastructure needs to support production growth.”

- Moody’s Credit Research, October 2013

Moody's S&P

Credit Rating (Moody’s / S&P)

Ba3 / BB-

B1 / B+

B2 / B

B3 / B-

9/1/2010 2/24/2011 5/31/2012 10/21/2013 2/18//20142/28/2012 11/28/20118/27/20115/27/2011

Ba2 / BB

Ba1 / BB+

Caa1 / CCC+

(1)

___________________________1. Represents corporate credit rating of Antero Resources Corporation / Antero Resources LLC.

Baa3 / BBB-

Moody’s Upgrade Criteria S&P Upgrade Criteria

36

ANTERO EBITDAX RECONCILIATION

37

EBITDAX Reconciliation($ in millions) (12 Months Ended)Antero Resources LLC 12/31/2012 12/31/2013

EBITDAX:Net income (loss) from continuing operations $225.3 $(24.2)Commodity derivative fair value (gains) losses (179.5) (491.7)Net cash receipts on settled commodity derivatives instruments 178.5 163.6(Gain) loss on sale of assets (291.2) -Interest expense and other 97.5 136.6Loss on early extinguishment of debt - 42.6Provision (benefit) for income taxes 121.2 186.2Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion 102.1 234.9Impairment of unproved properties 12.1 10.9Exploration expense 14.7 22.3Stock compensation expense - 365.3Other 4.1 2.9EBITDAX from continuing operations $284.7 $649.4

EBITDAX:Net income (loss) from discontinued operations ($510.3) 5.3Commodity derivative fair value (gains) losses (46.4) -Net cash receipts on settled commodity derivatives instruments 92.2 -(Gain) loss on sale of assets 795.9 (8.5)Provision (benefit) for income taxes (272.6) 3.2Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion 89.1 -Impairment of unproved properties 1.0 -Exploration expense 1.0 -EBITDAX from discontinued operations $149.6 -

EBITDAX $434.3 $649.4

Needed to make up for base declines in conventional and GOM production

? ??

Over 2,650 Antero Drilling Locations

Perm

ian

Nio

brar

a

Gra

nite

Was

h

Bar

nett

Hay

nesv

ille

U.S. INCREMENTAL GAS SUPPLY BREAK-EVEN PRICE CURVE(1)

38

Low cost, liquids-rich Utica and Marcellus Shales will remain attractive in most commodity price environments

Utica Shale

SW (Rich) Marcellus

Shale

1. Source: Credit Suisse report dated January 2014 – Break even price for 15% after tax rate-of-return; assumes $90.00/Bbl WTI

NE (Dry) Marcellus

ShaleEagle Ford

Shale

MARCELLUS & UTICA – ADVANTAGED ECONOMICS

CAUTIONARY NOTE

The SEC permits oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only proved, probable and possible reserve estimates (collectively, “3P”). Antero has provided internally generated estimates for proved, probable and possible reserves in this presentation in accordance with SEC guidelines and definitions. The estimates of proved, probable and possible reserves as of December 31, 2013 included in this presentation have been audited by Antero’s third-party engineers. Unless otherwise noted, reserve estimates are as of December 31, 2013, in ethane rejection and strip pricing.

Actual quantities that may be ultimately recovered from Antero’s interests may differ substantially from the estimates in this presentation. Factors affecting ultimate recovery include the scope of Antero’s ongoing drilling program, which will be directly affected by commodity prices, the availability of capital, drilling and production costs, availability of drilling services and equipment, drilling results, lease expirations, transportation constraints, regulatory approvals and other factors; and actual drilling results, including geological and mechanical factors affecting recovery rates.

In this presentation:

“3P reserves” refer to Antero’s estimated aggregate proved, probable and possible reserves as of December 31, 2013. The SEC prohibits companies from aggregating proved, probable and possible reserves in filings with the SEC due to the different levels of certainty associated with each reserve category.

“EUR,” or “Estimated Ultimate Recovery,” refers to Antero’s internal estimates of per well hydrocarbon quantities that may be potentially recovered from a hypothetical future well completed as a producer in the area. These quantities do not necessarily constitute or represent reserves within the meaning of the Society of Petroleum Engineer’s Petroleum Resource Management System or the SEC’s oil and natural gas disclosure rules.

“Condensate” refers to gas having a heat content between 1250 BTU and 1300 BTU in the Utica Shale.

“Highly-rich gas/condensate” refers to gas having a heat content between 1275 BTU and 1350 BTU in the Marcellus Shale and 1225 BTU and 1250 BTU in the Utica Shale.

“Highly-rich gas” refers to gas having a heat content between 1200 BTU and 1275 BTU in the Marcellus Shale and 1200 BTU and 1225 BTU in the Utica Shale.

“Rich gas” refers to gas having a heat content of between 1100 BTU and 1200 BTU.

“Dry gas” refers to gas containing insufficient quantities of hydrocarbons heavier than methane to allow their commercial extraction or to require their removal in order to render the gas suitable for fuel use.

Regarding Hydrocarbon Quantities

39

Company website presentation april 2014

Business

Transcript of Company website presentation april 2014