Communication System Design2004/03/08 Linking City Networks Team 14 NG Linkers Linking City Networks...
-
Upload
katherine-morris -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Communication System Design2004/03/08 Linking City Networks Team 14 NG Linkers Linking City Networks...
Communication System Design 2004/03/08Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Linking City Networks
Individual presentation
Communication System Design 2004/03/08Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Goals and benefits
Nicolas Joly
Individual presentation
Goals Benefits
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
-GoalsTechnical goalsBusiness goals
-BenefitsService providersOperatorsNetwork owners
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Technical Goals
- Finish to analyze technical characteristics of the networks
- Focus on possible schemes to link the networks
- Analyze current technical compatibility between various operator
- Identify possibilities to distribute and manage local services (sharing between network local services)
Goals Benefits
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Business Goals
- Finish to analyze the present business model (ownership, cash flow).
- Identify areas of conflict between stakeholders.
- Propose business models and contracts.
Goals Benefits
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Benefits
- Service providersIncrease customer base.Ability to peer traffic in the network.
- OperatorsLarger customer base.More local services.
- Network ownersimportant factor in marketing new apartments.increase their chances in receiving proper payback for their networks
Goals Benefits
Communication System Design 2004/03/08Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Current Status of Networks
Li Wei
Individual presentation
Current Status of Networks
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
• Major Players Involved
• Technical Features
• Technical Analysis
• Business Analysis
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Place Network owners
Communication Operators
Service Providers
(ISP)
Vällingby TeliaSonera&totally 5
Sollentuna Sollentuna Hem
Tele2,Tisc
ali totally 4
KistaIP 1 KTH KTH(non-profit)
KistaIP 2 OpenNet BAHNHOF&totally 3
Akalla Husby
Akalla Husby Network
Major Players Involved
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Place Technical Features
Key Equipment
Vällingby Layer2&3; VLAN; Central router: Cisco 7600; switch: 3550
Sollentuna
Layer2; VLAN; Local Service
Central switch: Extreme 6808;APswitch:HP;3Com
KistaIP 1 Layer2; VLAN; HP switch
KistaIP 2 Layer2; VLAN? Cisco 6500
Akalla Husby
Layer2; VLAN; Central node:ALCATEL 7800 AP switch:Alcatel 5022
Technical Features
Technical Analysis
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
• Benefits of VLANs:
-Flexible Network Segment
-Simple Management & Scalability
-Secure Network Environment
• Our Idea:
-Utilize TLS (Transparent LAN Services) technology to link these city networks
Communication System Design 2004/03/08Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Business Analysis
Daniel Johanisson
Individual presentation
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Business conditions summarized
Mutual interest
Case sensitive
Service providers will generate traffic
Time frame of approximately 5 years
Inevitable need for basic coordination
Keep overheads at a minimum
Neutrality is essential
Conditions
Critical questions Deal aspects
Cash flow
Comments
Conditions Critical questions
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Critical questions in a multi-operator network
1. How can a deal be made between different operators, with different services, without putting a new cost structure upon the operators?
2. What is the required critical mass (in terms of end-users) to support multiple operators and ISPs?
Deal aspects
Cash flow
Comments
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Critical aspects in operator – provider deals
Prices
Maintenance, fault & surveillance handling
Description of responsibility
Description of the technical layout
Description of customer placed equipment
Service descriptions for the deal
Conditions Critical questions
Deal aspects
Cash flow
Comments
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Cash flow schemes – the basics
Network Owner -> Operator
Operator -> Service Provider - Connection fee per user and connection
depending on service.- Monthly fee per user and service.- Example of another fee, depending on
specific case, is an establishing fee for the ISP/Service.
Service Provider -> Customer- Same as above plus margin and other fees.
Conditions Critical questions
Deal aspects Cash flow Comments
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Comments
Basic scheme too simplistic
Business models are different in respective
networks
Risk and pricing
Conditions Critical questions
Deal aspects Cash flow Comments
Communication System Design 2004/03/08Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Scenarios and proposed solution
Shikhar Singh
Individual presentation
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Important Factors
- The availability of the links between the networks.- The willingness of the networks to co-operate.- The money factor.- The technical compatibility factor.
SOLIX Solution
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Scenario 1
Ring TopologyAll the networks connected to their
neighbors forming a ring.
Pros and Cons…..
Easier and cheaper to implement.
Not scalable and not optimal.Many more problems with business
model
Scenario 1 Scenario 2 SOLIX Solution
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Scenario 2
STAR TopologyThe networks and the service providers connectedto a central exchange point.
Pros and ConsOptimal Solution. Very scalable. Easy to implementin the given networks.With SOLIX, the expenses are not high forimplementation.
Scenario 1 Scenario 2 SOLIX Solution
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Introduction to Solix
- SOLIX is a internet exchange operated partially by KTH.- Has a backbone which can form the central structure in STAR topology.- Is reliable and industry trusted.- Easy for technical solution implementation.- Is scalable.
Scenario 1 Scenario 2 SOLIX Solution
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Solution
- Concentrate on STAR topology.- SOLIX is the center of exchange.- The concept of Virtual LANS will be utilized.- Kista IP and OpenNet networks to be connected as a test bed.- Future general solution depends heavily on the test bed.
Scenario 1 Scenario 2 SOLIX Solution
Communication System Design 2004/03/08Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Kista IP network
Jie Chen
Individual presentation
Kista IP 1
Kista IP 2
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Case Study - Kista IP
Two Networks to be studied: Kista IP 1 Network owner – Svenska Bostäder Operator – KTH
Kista IP 2 Network owner – Svenska Bostäder Operator - OpenNet
Unfinished
Kista IP 1
Kista IP 2
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Kista IP 1
A private network including 144 student apartments in Kista Alléväg Located next to the KTH university campus in Kista as well as many of the leading IT industries Used as a test bed for new technology and services Projects involved: IP-TV, IP-telephony, Open neutral networks, quality of service, triple play services, mobility, vlans, business models, private GSM/GPRS networks
Unfinished
Kista IP 1
Kista IP 2
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Kista IP 1
Connected to the outside world via Kista IX, which has accessed to Solix Connected to the KTH Kista Campus Network, Connected to KTHLAN and Sunet on campus via the Green Network Given free of charge for the tenants living at Kista IP, Commercial access to Internet will be made available from various operators in the future.
Unfinished
Kista IP 1
Kista IP 2
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Kista IP 2
A commercial network connecting student apartments and other companies in Kista Two intelligent multilayer modular switches Cisco catalyst 6505 and several Ethernet switches products of Extreme Network 3 ISPs providing service at the moment Providing various local services, such as video and IP telephony
Unfinished
Kista IP 1
Kista IP 2
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Unfinished
Detailed technical feature in Kista IP 2 Meeting with OpenNet and its position remains further investigation Connecting these two network directly or through Solix Technical compatibility and agreement Business model to harmonize academic network with commercial management
Unfinished
Communication System Design 2004/03/08Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
Future Work
Tong liu
Individual presentation
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
- Build a feasible business model for KistaIP I & KistaIP II- A general business model for linking networks- To propose the contracts and billing models with SOLIX as a part of the network.
Business model for case study
(Kista IP I / II)
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
- Implement the technical solution formulated for KistaIP I & Kista IPII .
- To generalize the above mentioned technical solution for all the city networks.
Technical solution for case study
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
- LABS2(contact) http://www.labs2.com
- Packetfront(contact)http://www.packetfront.com
- SSNF(The Swedish Urban Network Association )
http://www.ssnf.org OPENNet(difficult thing)
http://www.opennet.se
Meetings with …
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
- What kinds services can be provided via IP networks?
- How do the different networks share one “local” service?
Local service (2 questions)
Linking
City
Networks
Team 14
NG Linkers
- The Project Progress
- Slides
- Presentation
Midterm presentation