Communication organization 3 preston university
Transcript of Communication organization 3 preston university
PRESTON UNIVERSITY ISLAMABAD
Organizational Communication
Assignment # 3
Q 1. Write a note on Communication Style.
Submitted to
Dr. Abdul Basit
Submitted by
Abid Ali Akbar1434-315005
MBA-IT (2.5)Quarter Jun-Aug 2015
Submitted Date29 June 2015
Communication Style.
Definition
A Communication style is the way we share information with others. Although we all
like to think that we're saying exactly what we mean, that's not always the case because
we may be speaking with someone who uses a totally different communication
style than our own
Four styles of communication.
1. An effective manager has a variety of styles that he or she can use depending on
the situation. They all involve the degree to which a manager decides to involve
employees in decision making. Management styles also reflect the relationship the
manager has with employees. A management style model will help you see the
difference
between the available management approaches.” R. Tannenbaum and W. Schmidt
(1958) and Sadler (1970) provide a continuum for management and employee
involvement that includes an increasing role for employees and a decreasing role for
managers in the decision making process. The continuum includes these management
styles.
2. Now we will discuss all of these types in detail.
a. Tell . This is also known as the autocratic style of management. It
represents top down, dictatorial decision making with little employee input.
Tell is also the manner in which traditional, hierarchical organizations
communicated with employees. For example. A professor who is teaching
communication strategies
to his students. The
professor must have
sufficient knowledge
about the objectives and
subject both in order to use tell style of communication. He can however,
ask questions about the subject which will be aprox 5-10% of the
communication.
b. Sell . In the sell management style, the communicator has made the
decision and then attempts to persuade audience that the decision is
correct. The communicator attempts to gain commitment from audience by
selling the positive aspects of the decision. During the process of selling
the decision, the communicator may allow the audience to influence the
details of the decision.
For example, a
company project
manager delivering the
presentation regarding
his proposal, mentioning all the objectives of that project and proves that,
this project will go in the favour of the company. The audience are
involved in the discussion about various aspects of the project or for
seeking details.
c. Confer / Consult . In the
consult management style,
the communicator requests
audience’s input into a decision but retains the authority to make the final
decision. The key to using the consult management style successfully is to
inform audience, on the front end of the discussion, that their input is
needed, but that the communicator will make the final decision. When
audience are asked for input, and feel that their input was not used and
did not influence the decision, this may create audience
disenfranchisement. This is the level of involvement that can create
severe audience dissatisfaction when the reasons for the decision are not
clear. They may become cynical and unwilling to provide input the next
time the communicator needs their advice and thoughts. Additionally, for
success, the communicator must explain why audience’s input was or was
not used. For example a social group’s workshop or conference about a
social cause where all are consulted and conferred upon to reach to
objective of the meeting.
d. Join . In the join management style, the communicator invites audience to
join him or her in making the decision. The communicator considers his or
her voice equal to the
audience in the decision
making process. All are sitting
together around the same
table and every voice is a key
in the decision. A join
management style is effective
when the communicator truly
builds agreement and commitment around a decision. The communicator
must also be willing to keep his or her influence equal to the degree of
influence that other audience who provide input exert. The join
management style is effective whenever a communicator is willing to
share authority. For example, A production manager invites employees to
join him in making the decision about a impromptu problem being faced on
the production line.
e. On the positive side, the join management style engenders a great deal of
commitment to and ownership by employees of the course of action
chosen. The manager will not need to sell his or her idea or tell employees
what to do. On the flip side, reaching a shared agreement on a decision
takes a lot of time. It requires employees to participate in conflict about the
solution, an act that many employees are unprepared to do, by culture,
nature, or training. Consensus decision making is not always positive
either. It can encourage group to think and sink a decision to the lowest
common denominator. When the goal is agreement, the optimum solution,
goal, or approach is rarely the result.