Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETP): EIA · PDF fileCommon Effluent Treatment Plants...
Transcript of Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETP): EIA · PDF fileCommon Effluent Treatment Plants...
Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETP): EIA Process
ByDr. M. Anji Reddy
Professor of EnvironmentJNT University HyderabadEmail: [email protected]@rediffmail.com
CII JNTUH
Date: 23-11-2012
To minimize environmental pollution due tothe small and medium scale industries.
• Cleaner production technologies • Waste minimization methods and centers• Collective treatment at a centralized facility, called as the CETP : A viable treatment solution.
• Till 1990, only one CETP at Jeedimetla, Hyderabad
CII JNTUH
Innovative Financial Support Scheme for CETP
• State ‐ 25%• Central ‐ 25% matching grant• Loans ‐ 30%• SME ‐ 20% of the
project capital cost.• A total of 130 CETPs• 91 ‐ in operation
CII JNTUH
Zone‐wise Status as per MoEFZone Number of
CETPsNorthern Zone (UP – 3, Haryana – 1, Punjab –2, Delhi– 10 complete, 2under construction, 3 kept in abeyance
16
Western Zone (Gujarat – 19, Maharashtra – 12) 31
Eastern Zone (WB‐1) 1
Central Zone (Rajasthan – 5, MP‐ 1) 6
South Zone (T.N – 33, AP – 2, Karnataka – 2) 37
CII JNTUH
Advantages of CETP• facilitates ‘economy of scale’ in waste treatment• addresses the ‘lack of space’ issue• homogenization of wastewater• better hydraulic stability• professional control• facilitates small scale units• eliminates multiple discharges• recycling and reuse• organization of treated effluent and sludgedisposal
CII JNTUH
Problems and constraints• Consistency in operation• lack of access to
– capital investments, – working capitals, – specialized technical skills,– inconsistent effluent quality from member industries
• improper management of treatment units• varied nature and scale of the industries, along with the addition of industries in a haphazard manner, without proper planning
• no provision to tackle the fluctuations in the pollution load and quantities, at individual member industries
• no separate treatment units to deal with hazardous and toxic effluents, etc.
CII JNTUH
Influencing factors in Planning of CETPs
• categories of effluent generating member industries• qualitative/quantitative fluctuations of effluent (equalization/ homogenization /modules)
• pre‐treatment requirements• segregation of effluent streams at individual member industry
• collection and monitoring mechanism• treatability choice of technology and bio degradability, interferences
• mode of disposal; and• charging system
CII JNTUH
CII JNTUH
Qualitative/quantitative fluctuations of effluent
• Quantity of effluent• Flow rate• Effluent characteristics
– Physical characteristics– Chemical characteristics
CII JNTUH
The basic principles of Waste minimization
• Avoiding or eliminating the production ofwastecan be carried out by choosing an alternativeprocess/ advanced technologies when designing aproduction unit
• Reduction and minimization of waste within the industry
can be achieved by considering all the processesand activities which may lead to production ofwaste
CII JNTUH
Parameter Concentration
pH 5.5 ‐ 9.0
Temperature (oC) 45.0
Oil and grease 20.0
Cyanide (as CN) 2.0
Ammoniacal nitrogen(as N) 50.0
Phenolic compounds (as C6H5OH) 5.0
Hexavalent Chromium 2.0
Total chromium 2.0
Copper 3.0
Nickel 3.0
Zinc 15.0
Lead 1.0
Arsenic 0.2
Mercury 0.01
Cadmium 1.0
Selenium 0.05
Fluoride 15.0
Boron 2.0
Radioactive Materials
Alfa emitters, Hc/ml 10‐7
Beta emitters, Hc/ml 10‐8
Inlet Effluent Quality Standards for CETPs (Source MoEF)CII JNTUH
Treated Effluent Quality of Common Effluent Treatment PlantConcentration in mg/l except pH and Temperature
S. No Parameter Into inlandSurface waters
On land forIrrigation
Into Marine Coastal areas
1 pH 5.5 – 9.0 5.5 – 9.0 5.5 – 9.0
2 BOD5 20oC 30 100 100
3 Oil & Grease 10 10 20
4 TemperatureoC Shall no exceed40oC in anysection of thestream within 15meters downstreamfrom theeffluent outlet
‐ 45oC at the point ofDischarge
CII JNTUH
5 Suspended Solids 100 200 (a) For processwastewaters ‐100(b) For cooling watereffluents 10% abovetotal suspendedmatter of effluentcooling water
6 Dissolved Solids(inorganic)
2100 2100 ‐
7 Total residualChlorine
1.0 ‐ 1.0
8 Ammonical nitrogen (as N)
50 ‐ 50
9 Total Kjeldahlnitrogen (as N)
100 ‐ 100
10 Chemical OxygenDemand (COD)
250 ‐ 250
CII JNTUH
11 Arsenic (as As) 0.2 0.2 0.2
12 Mercury (as Hg) 0.01 ‐ 0.01
13 Lead (as Pb) 0.1 ‐ 0.1
14 Cadmium (as Cd) 1.0 ‐ 1.0
15 Total Chromium (as Cr) 2.0 2.0
16 Copper (as Cu) 3.0 3.0
17 Zinc (as Zn) 5.0 ‐ 15
CII JNTUH
18 Selenium (as Se) 0.05 ‐ 0.05
19 Nickel (as Ni) 3.0 ‐ 5.0
20 Boron (as B) 2.0 2.0 ‐
21 Percent Sodium ‐ 60 ‐
22 Cyanide (as CN) 0.2 0.2 0.2
23 Chloride (as Cl) 1000 600 ‐
24 Fluoride (as F) 2.0 ‐ 15
CII JNTUH
Modes of disposal
• Surface water bodies• On land for irrigation• Marine outfall• Public sewers
CII JNTUH
Attributes to be considered for Cost analysisCapital Cost• Land• Process know‐how• Equipment and electrical• Civil including administrative building and process units and internal
roads and / or approaches• Stand‐by DG Sets• Piping (preferably High Density Poly Ethylene (HDPE) of suitable
pressure rating)• Instrumentation (plant) such as
− flow meters (at entry, to Aera on tanks and outlet)− D.O. meters in aera on tanks− TOC meter− TDS meter− VOC meter, etc., as required by SPCB
• Laboratory equipment for analysis including instrumental analysis• Piping in the industrial estate or for tankers
CII JNTUH
Operational Cost• Power (state electricity Board and Diesel for stand‐by DG Sets)• Fresh drinking water / bore water for chemical solution preparation• Transportation charges of effluent if planned to collect by gravity after
collection of• sample and analysis or road tankers• Sewage water charges (if provided)• Plant maintenance and repairs
− Mechanical− Electrical− Instruments
• Sludge disposal charges• Laboratory chemicals and glassware• Plant process chemicals (consumables) like lime, alum, poly electrolyte,
etc.• Effluent and sludge analysis charges by external agency once in 6 months
by a MoEF approved laboratory for comparison with in‐house analysis• Electrical spares• Mechanical spares• Consultancy charges (if required)• R&D activity expenditure
CII JNTUH
Administrative and others
• Salaries and benefits• Overtime• Auditors charges• Bonus, medical and other benefits
CII JNTUH
Water Treatment : 5 steps• Segregation at source of generation.• Preliminary treatment - It involves a number of unit processes to eliminate
undesirable characteristics of wastewater. Processes include use of screen, grit chambers for removal of sand and large particles, communitors for grinding of coarse solids, pre-aeration for odour control and removal of oil and grease.
• Primary treatment- It involves removal of settable solids prior to biological treatment. The general treatment units include: flash mixer + flocculator + sedimentation
• Secondary treatment- It involves purification of wastewater primarily with dissolved organic matter by microbial action. A number of processes are available but the ones that are mainly used are anaerobic and /or aerobic treatment methods.
• Tertiary treatment - This mainly includes physical and chemical treatment processes that can be used after the biological treatment to meet the treatment objectives.
CII JNTUH
“E I A PROCESSEnvironmental impact assessment (EIA) is acomprehensive and systematic process designed toidentify, analyze and evaluate the environmental effectsof proposed projects. It:
• involves the public in an open and participatory manner• allows for the effective integration of environmental
considerations and public concerns into decision-making
• is a powerful tool to help decision-makers achieve thegoal of sustainable development”
CII JNTUH
EIA as a Regulatory tool in integratingEnvironmental concerns in economic developmentprocess EIA was made mandatory as per MoEF notificationJanuary-1994 Revised notification: September 14th, 2006 withstructural changes under environmental protectionAct.(1986) It should be noted that the inclusion of climatechange into the EIA process requires no change to theessential steps or sequence of the process
CII JNTUH
TENETS OF EIA NOTIFICATION 2006
Prior EC based on pollution potential instead ofinvestment criteria
Decentralization of clearing powers to the state / UTlevel authorities
Quicker transparent and effective mechanism of ECcertificate
Based on technical and operational issues
CII JNTUH
It is necessary to understand the links between environments and development in order to make
development choices that will be Economically efficientsocially equitable and responsible andenvironmentally sound
SustainableDevelopment
SocialDevelopment
Economic Development
EnvironmentalDevelopment
EQUITABLEBEARABLE
components of sustainable development
CII JNTUH
OBJECTIVES OF EIA(as per MoEF notification 2006)
To ensure environmental considerations are explicitly addressed and
incorporated into the development decision-making process
To anticipate and avoid, minimize or offset the adverse significant
biophysical, social and other relevant effects of development proposals
To protect the productivity and capacity of natural systems and the
ecological processes which maintain their functions; and
To promote development that is sustainable and optimize resource use and
management opportunities
CII JNTUH
As per MoEF guidelines and EIA notification 2006 Govt. of India, has grouped all the new industries into 8 sectors
1. Mining, extraction of natural resources and power generation2. Primary processing3. Materials production4. Materials processing5. Manufacturing / fabrication 6. Service sector7. Physical infrastructure including environmental service8. Building/ construction projects/ area development projects and townships
CII JNTUH
As per MoEF guidelines and EIA notification 2006 Govt. of India, has constituted a Central Expert Appraisal Committee (CEAC) and Central Environmental Impact Assessment Authority (CEIAA) to
evaluate
All ‘A – Category’ projects : EAC and EIAA
All ‘B – Category’ :SEAC’S and SEIAA
CII JNTUH
CII JNTUH
CII JNTUH
CII JNTUH
CII JNTUH
CII JNTUH
CII JNTUH
CII JNTUH
Whether any new project/expansion/modernization falls
under the preview of
NO
YES
categoryCategory Category A or
Submission of applicationBy proponent
Submission of applicationBy proponent
Scrutiny by EAC for Scrutiny by EAC for Category
Rejection
Communication of TORS to theProponent for EIA preparation
Communication of TORS to theProponent for EIA preparation
Submission of draft EIA /request for public hearing
Submission of draft EIA /request for public hearing
Conducting public hearing SPCB / PCC
Submission of proceedings of the public hearing by the SPCB / PCCTo EIAA/ SEIAA and project proponent
No Environmental clearance required
Submission of the final EIA by the proponent after improving EIA/EMP
SCRE
SCO
Public Consult
Category
Cont…..
90
Period for Conducting
EIA
15
Period for ImprovingEIA/EMP
Proposed EnvironmentalOperational Mechanism
Appraisal by EAC Appraisal by SEAC
DecisionDecision
Clear Clear
Issuing clearance to Reservation
Reservation on the proposalConveyed to EAC
Reservation on the proposalConveyed to SEAC
EIA Views in reservationSent to EIAA
SEAC views on reservationsent to SEIAA
DecisionDecision
Cleared Cleared
Inform project proponent
APPR
Rejection Rejection
60
60
120 days
CII JNTUH
10 Activity Model in EIA study• Project Description and Need (PDN)• Pertinent Institutional Information (PII)• Identification of Potential Impacts (IPI)• Description of Effected Environment (DEE)• Impact Prediction (IP)• Impact Assessment (IA)• Impact Mitigation IM)• Selecting the Proposed Action (SPA)• Preparing the Written Documentation (PWD)• Environmental Monitoring and Management Plan
(EM and MP)
CII JNTUH
Terms of Reference for CETP (MoEF, 2010)• Executive summary of the project – giving aprima facie idea of the objectives of the proposal,use of resources, justification, etc. In addition, itshould provide a compilation of EIA report,including EMP and post project monitoring planin brief.
• Justification for selecting the proposed unit size.• Land requirement for the project including its break up for various purposes, its availability and optimization.
CII JNTUH
TOR continued.
• Details of proposed layout clearly demarcating variousunits/industries within the plant.
• Complete process flow diagram describing each unit,its processes and operations, along with material andenergy inputs and outputs (material and energybalance).
• Details of the industries for which CETP facility isproposed including raw materials used and productsmanufactured.
• Expected quantity of wastewater from each industryand justification for selecting the proposed capacity ofthe treatment plant/modules.
• Characteristics of effluent and proposed segregation of streams, if any, from individual member industries.
• Details of mode of effluent collection systemeither by tankers and/or pipeline, etc., orproposed trouble‐shooting mechanism.
• Monitoring protocol in case of collection ofeffluent through pipeline and/or tankers.
• Details on physical, chemical and biologicalcharacteristics of the combined effluent andits concentrations and the basis for the same.
• Details of equalization tank at least for 24 hrs;and guard ponds for holding treatedwastewater or continuous monitoringfacilities, if any.
TOR continued.
• Details of the proposed treatment schemes supportedby the treatability studies including source separationof streams for specific mode of collection andtreatment either at individual industry or at CETP(based on economic and operational easeconsiderations).
• Built‐in flexibility provisions to deal with quantitativeand qualitative fluctuations.
• Organizational setup for collection of pretreatedeffluents, treatment and disposal of the treatedeffluents, etc. and deployment of qualified/skilled manpower.
• Details of O&M for maximum utilization of thedesigned capacity of the plant.
TOR continued.
CII JNTUH
• Proposed monitoring protocol for stage‐wise quality control w.r.t. various characteristics and maintenance schedules followed for all rotating equipment including lubricating/oil fill, operational chemicals and laboratory chemicals.
• For any sensitive environmental parameters such as heavy metals, fluorides, etc.,
• details on improved material of construction of tanks and other equipments such as
• corrosion resistance, allowance, etc.
TOR continued.
• Details of power consumption and stand‐by arrangementslike the diesel generator (DG) sets, dual fuel (gas and oil) foruninterrupted operation of treatment plant.
• Protocol and mechanism to accept the effluent by tankersonly during day time, including the adequacy of thereceiving/holding tanks, etc.
• Impact of the project on local infrastructure of the studyarea such as road network, etc. If the study area requiresany additional infrastructure, details of the agencyresponsible for the same should be included along with thetime frame. Details of the permission from the competentAuthority for conveyor belt crossing the village road.
• If the ultimate disposal is through a marine outfall thenpreliminary design of the outfall with estimated initialdilution.
• Details of laboratory, workshop, database, library, waste exchange centers, etc. in CETP.
TOR continued.
• Availability of the land for proposed treatment for ultimate capacity and to accommodate required greenbelt development.
• Details of the proposed methods of water conservation and recharging.
• Management plan for solid/hazardous waste generation, storage, utilization and disposal.
• Detailed plan of treated wastewater disposal/ reuse/ utilization / management.
• Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel storage, restroom, etc. to the workers during construction and operation phase.
TOR continued.
CII JNTUH
• In case of expansion of existing industries,remediation measures adopted to restore theenvironmental quality if the groundwater, soil,crop, air, etc., are affected and a detailedcompliance to the prior environmentalclearance/consent conditions.
• Details on equity by the member industries/nonrefundable membership fee to ensure continuityof membership and financial model, etc.
• Any litigation pending against the project and /orany direction /order passed by any Court of Lawrelated to the environmental pollution andimpacts in the last two years, if so, detailsthereof.
TOR continued.
CII JNTUH
Description of the environment• The study area shall be up to a distance of 5 km from the
boundary of the proposed site and all along the collection network/route map of tanker movement, treated wastewater carrying pipe‐line and the receiving environment at the point of disposal.
• Location of the project site and nearest habitats with distances from the project site to be demarcated on a toposheet (1: 50000 scale).
• Landuse based on satellite imagery including location specific sensitivities such as national parks / wildlife sanctuary, villages, industries, etc. for the study area.
• Demography details of all the villages falling within the study area.
• Topography details of the project area.
TOR continued.
CII JNTUH
• The baseline data to be collected from the study area w.r.t.different components of environment viz. air, noise, water,land, and biology and socio‐economic (please refer Section4.4.2 for guidance for assessment of baseline componentsand identify attributes of concern). Actual monitoring ofbaseline environmental components shall be strictlyaccording to the parameters prescribed in the ToR afterconsidering the proposed coverage of parameters by theproponent in draft ToR and shall commence afterfinalization of ToR by the competent Authority.
• Geological features and geo‐hydrological status of the studyarea.
• Surface water quality of nearby water sources and othersurface drains.
• Details on ground water quality.
TOR continued.
CII JNTUH
• Details on water quality parameters such as pH,Temperature (oC), Oil and grease, Cyanide* (as CN),Ammoniacal nitrogen* (as N), Phenolic compounds* (asC6H5OH), Hexavalent Chromium*, Total chromium*,Copper*, Nickel*, Lead*, Arsenic*, Mercury*, Cadmium*,Selenium*, Fluoride*, Boron*, Radioactive materials*, Alfaemitters*, Hc/ml,Beta emitters*, Hc/ml*, etc. (* ‐ asapplicable).
• Details on existing ambient air quality and expected, stackand fugitive emissions for PM10, PM2.5, SO2*, NOx*,VOCs*, carbon oxides (CO and CO2) etc., and evaluation ofthe adequacy of the proposed pollution control devices tomeet standards for point sources and to meet AAQstandards. (* ‐ As applicable)
• The air quality contours may be plotted on a location mapshowing the location of project site, habitation nearby,sensitive receptors, if any and wind roses.
TOR continued.
• Details on noise levels at sensitive/commercial receptors.
• Site‐specific micro‐meteorological data including mixing height.
• One season site‐specific data excluding monsoon season.
• Proposed baseline monitoring network for the consideration and approval of the Competent Authority.
• Ecological status (terrestrial and aquatic) of the study area such as habitat type and quality, species, diversity, rarity, fragmentation, ecological linkage, age, abundance,etc.
TOR continued.
• If any incompatible landuse attributes fall within a 5 km radius of the project boundary, proponent shall describe the sensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose the additional points based on significance for review and acceptance by the EAC/SEAC. Incompatible landuse attributes include:− Public water supply areas from rivers/surface water bodies, from ground water− Scenic areas/tourism areas/hill resorts− Religious places, pilgrim centers that a ract over 10 lakh pilgrims a year
TOR continued.
− Protected tribal settlements (notified tribal areaswhere industrial activity is not permitted)
− CRZ− Monuments of national significance, WorldHeritage Sites
− Cyclone, Tsunami‐prone areas (based on last 25years)
− Airport areas− Any other feature as specified by the State or localgovernment and other features as locallyapplicable, including prime agricultural lands,pastures, migratory corridors, etc.
TOR continued.
CII JNTUH
• If ecologically sensitive attributes fall within a 5 km radiusof the project boundary, proponent shall describe thesensitivity (distance, area and significance) and propose theadditional points based on significance for review andacceptance by the EAC/SEAC. Ecological sensitive attributesinclude:
− Na onal parks− Wild life sanctuaries, Game reserve− Tiger reserve/elephant reserve/turtle nes ng ground− Mangrove area− Wetlands− Reserved and Protected forests, etc.− Any other closed/protected area under the Wild Life
(Protection) Act, 1972, any other area locally applicable
• If the location falls in a valley, studies on specific issues connected to the natural resources management
TOR continued.
• Identification of CRZ area: A CRZ map duly authenticated by one of the authorized agencies demarcating LTL(Low Tide Level), HTL (High Tide Level), CRZ area, location of the project and associate facilities w.r.t. CRZ, coastal features such as mangroves, if any. The route of the pipeline, etc., passing through CRZ, if any, should also be demarcated. Recommendations of the State Coastal Management Authority for the activities to be taken up in the CRZ.
• CRZ map in 1:10000 scale in general cases and in 1:5000 scale for specific observations.
• Environmental parameters – Temperature, sea level pressure, wind speed, mean relative humidity, visibility, salinity, density, rainfall, fog, frequency and intensity of cyclones, sediment transport, seismic characteristics, fresh water influx.
• Details on marine biological parameters – microbiological population, pathogenic bacteria, plankton distribution, fish spawning grounds in the adjoining waters, commercial fisheries potential, vegetation including inter tidal, flora and fauna in the marine, benthal quality assessment for biological species and heavy metals and estuarine environment.
TOR continued.
Anticipated environmental impacts and mitigation measures
• Anticipated generic environmental impacts dueto this project are indicated in Table 4‐2, whichmay be evaluated for significance and based oncorresponding likely impacts VECs may beidentified. Baseline studies may be conducted forall the concerned VECs and likely impacts willhave to be assessed for their magnitude in orderto identify mitigation measures (please referChapter 4 of the manual for guidance).
• Tools as given in Section 4.4.3 may be referred forthe appropriate assessment of environmentalimpacts and same may be submitted in draft ToRfor consideration and approval by EAC/SEAC.
TOR continued.
• While identifying the likely impacts, also include the following foranalysis of significance and required mitigation measures:− impacts due to transportation of raw materials and end productson thesurrounding environment− impacts on surface water, soil and groundwater− impacts due to air pollution− impacts due to odour pollution− impacts due to noise− impacts due to fugitive emissions− impact on health of workers due to proposed project activities− Impact on the disposal mode‐specific receiving environment
• Proposed odour control measures.• Action plan for the greenbelt development – species, width of
plantations, planning schedule etc. in accordance to CPCB publishedguidelines.
• In case of likely impact from the proposed project on the surrounding reserve forests,Plan for the conservation of wild fauna in consultation with the State Forest Department.
TOR continued.
• For identifying the mitigation measures, please refer Chapter III for source control and treatment. Besides typical mitigation measures which may also be considered are discussed in Table 4‐5.
• Details in case, if the effluent conveyance system uses pipe lines, details regarding minimum (one day) storage tank with mixing facility to keep it in aerobic conditions at source industry and mechanism to ensure compliance with prescribed standards at this storage tank.
• Details regarding soil and groundwater impacts and regular monitoring protocols suggested for ensuring no significant impacts, besides preventive measures.
• Impacts due to laying of pipe lines for effluent collection and for the disposal of the treated wastewaters.
• Bathymetric studies need to be conducted and models shall be applied to predict the dispersion patterns to determine the length of the outfall, if disposal is through a marine outfall.
TOR continued.
• Capital quantity of dredging material, disposal and its impact on aquatic life.
• Details on fisheries study which are conducted w.r.t. benthos and marine organic material and coastal fisheries.
• Details of storm water collection network and utilization plan, etc.
• Proposed measures for occupational safety and health of the workers.
TOR continued.
CII JNTUH
Analysis of alternative resources and technologies• Comparison of alternate sites considered and the reasons for
selecting the proposed site. Conformity of the site with the prescribed guidelines in terms of CRZ, river, highways, railways, etc.
• Drainage area and alterations, if any due to the project.• Details on improved technologies.
Environmental monitoring program• Monitoring programme for pollution control at source.• Monitoring pollutants at receiving environment for the appropriate
notified parameters – air quality, groundwater, surface water, etc. during operational phase of the project.
• Specific programme to monitor safety and health protection of workers.
• Appropriate monitoring network has to be designed and proposed, to assess the possible residual impacts on VECs.
• Details of in‐house monitoring capabilities and the recognized agencies if proposed for conducting monitoring.
TOR continued.
Additional studies
• Details on risk assessment and damage control during differentphases of the project and proposed safeguard measures.
• Details on socio‐economic development activities such ascommercial property values, generation of jobs, education, socialconflicts, cultural status, accidents, etc.
• Proposed plan to handle the socio‐economic influence on the localcommunity. The plan should include quantitative dimension as faras possible.
• Details on compensation package for the people affected by theproject, considering the socio‐economic status of the area,homestead oustees, land oustees, and landless labourers.
• Points identified in the public hearing and commitment of theproject proponent to the same. Detailed action plan addressing theissues raised, and the details of necessary allocation of funds.
TOR continued.
CII JNTUH
Environmental management plan• Administrative and technical organizational structure to ensure proposed post‐project monitoring programmefor approved mitigation measures.
• EMP devised to mitigate the adverse impacts of the project should be provided along with item‐wise cost of its implementation (capital and recurring costs).
• Allocation of resources and responsibilities for plan implementation.
• Details of the emergency preparedness plan and on‐site and off‐site disaster management plan.
TOR continued.
CII JNTUH
CETP – at Nacharam & MallapurOngoing Project(CONSTRUCTION PHASE)
ENTRANCE OF THE PLANT(Claimed under Progress Reports 2&3)CII JNTUH
PLASTERING OF OFFICE BUILDING UNDER PROGRESS(Claimed under Progress Reports 2&3)
CII JNTUH
PUMPS AT COLLECTION TANK(Claimed in Progress Report 3)
CII JNTUH
RAW EFFLUENT PUMPS(Claimed in Progress Report 3)
CII JNTUH
CII JNTUH
VIEW OF THE AIR GRID IN THE EQUALIZATION TANK(Claimed in Progress Report 3)
CII JNTUH
AIR GRID IN AERATION TANK – IN PROCESS(Claimed in Progress Report 3)
CII JNTUH
HEADER LINE FOR AIR SUPPLY – BLOWERS TO AERATION TANKS(Claimed in Progress Reports 2&3)
CII JNTUH
BIRD’S-EYE VIEW OF RCC TANKS & CONTROL PANEL ROOM
(Claimed in Progress Reports 1, 2 & 3)
CII JNTUH
BIRD’S-EYE VIEW OF RAILINGS AT THE RCC TANKS(Claimed in Progress Reports 1, 2 & 3)
CII JNTUH
VARIOUS RCC TANKS AT THE SITE(Claimed in Progress Reports 1, 2 & 3)
CII JNTUH
DOSING & CHEMICAL PREPARATION SECTION(Claimed in Progress Report 3)
CII JNTUH
FAB MEDIA(Claimed in Progress Reports 1, 2 & 3)
CII JNTUH
VALVES & HOSE PIPES FOR THE AIR GRID AT AERATION TANKS(Claimed in Progress Report 3)
CII JNTUH
SAMPLE SHOT OF HDPE AND UPVC PIPE FITTINGS(Claimed in Progress Report 3)
CII JNTUH
INTERCONNECTING PIPELINES FOR PUMPS(Claimed in Progress Report 3)
CII JNTUH
CII JNTUH
VIEW OF THE GRAVITY LINES FOR THE AERATION TANKS(Claimed in Progress Report 3)
CII JNTUH
MS FILTERS (PSF & ACF)(Claimed in Progress Report 3)
CII JNTUH
FILTER PRESS ATOP THE DECANTER ROOM(Claimed in Progress Report 3)
CII JNTUH
CLOSE-UP SHOT OF THE FILTER PRESS STRUCTURE(Claimed in Progress Report 3)
CII JNTUH
FILTER PRESS PLATES(Claimed in Progress Report 3)
CII JNTUH
MCC PANEL BOARD(Claimed in Progress Report 3)
CII JNTUH
PAINTS & OTHER MISCELLANEOUS MATERIAL(Claimed in Progress Report 3)
CII JNTUH