Common Core State Standards

24
Common Core State Standards Session 5 3-5 English Language Arts

description

Common Core State Standards. Session 5 3-5 English Language Arts. Day 2 – PM Session 1:45-4:15. OUTCOMES Participants will increase their knowledge of: how to support and challenge student comprehension of complex text. how to effectively integrate reading, writing, listening, and speaking. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Common Core State Standards

Page 1: Common Core State Standards

Common Core State StandardsSession 5

3-5 English Language Arts

Page 2: Common Core State Standards

Day 2 – PM Session1:45-4:15

OUTCOMESParticipants will increase their knowledge of:• how to support and challenge student comprehension of

complex text.• how to effectively integrate reading, writing, listening, and

speaking.• how to actively engage students in reading and writing

tasks.

2

Page 3: Common Core State Standards

Comprehension Instructional Sequence

Demonstration Lesson

3

Page 4: Common Core State Standards

4

STEP ONE

Final Written Response to the Reading of the TextStudents compare their final written response to their previous written responses to see their growth in thinking across time.

Whole Group Categorizing of Questions

Engage in Collaborative Inquiry to: •search/locate answers to multiple significant questions generated by students•evaluate source/text information:

identify biasdetermine credibility & validity corroboration across sources

•post answers on Question/Answer Concept Board – ongoing process over time

Comprehension Instructional Sequence Timeline Text-Based Discussion on Essential Question(Efferent Discussion)

Model Question Generation – one of the most potent strategies

Directed Note-Taking during Reading #2: students identify relevant & significant text informationFollow-up Text-Based Discussion(Efferent)

Text-Marking during Reading #1: use a coding system that engages students in critical thinkingFollow-up Text-Based Discussion (Efferent discussion)

Topic Question andStrategic Use of Afferent Discussion Grasp the students’ interest

Predictive WritingBefore reading the article, or having text based discussion with their classmates, the students write briefly; this writing reveals the level of prior knowledge students regarding the topic. When they share their writing with each other, background knowledge for the topic will be developed.

Vocabulary Instruction: •Morphemic analysis•Contextual analysis•Both

Student Question Generation during Reading #3All students generate relevant questions on post-it notes to place on poster

Ongoing Collaborative

Inquiry Ongoing

Question & Answer Concept Board

Written Response to Reading

Students use what they have learned from their first and second text-reading, text-based discussions, & note-taking to write a response to the question:•Students use text information to justify claims/positions in their response

STEP TWO STEP THREE

Page 5: Common Core State Standards

5

STEP ONE

Final Written Response to the Reading of the TextStudents compare their final written response to their previous written responses to see their growth in thinking across time.

Whole Group Categorizing of Questions

Engage in Collaborative Inquiry to: •search/locate answers to multiple significant questions generated by students•evaluate source/text information:

identify biasdetermine credibility & validity corroboration across sources

•post answers on Question/Answer Concept Board – ongoing process over time

Comprehension Instructional Sequence Timeline Text-Based Discussion on Essential Question(Efferent Discussion)

Model Question Generation – one of the most potent strategies

Directed Note-Taking during Reading #2: students identify relevant & significant text informationFollow-up Text-Based Discussion(Efferent)

Text-Marking during Reading #1: use a coding system that engages students in critical thinkingFollow-up Text-Based Discussion (Efferent discussion)

Topic Question andStrategic Use of Afferent Discussion Grasp the students’ interest

Predictive WritingBefore reading the article, or having text based discussion with their classmates, the students write briefly; this writing reveals the level of prior knowledge students regarding the topic. When they share their writing with each other, background knowledge for the topic will be developed.

Vocabulary Instruction: •Morphemic analysis•Contextual analysis•Both

Student Question Generation during Reading #3All students generate relevant questions on post-it notes to place on poster

Ongoing Collaborative

Inquiry Ongoing

Question & Answer Concept Board

Written Response to Reading

Students use what they have learned from their first and second text-reading, text-based discussions, & note-taking to write a response to the question:•Students use text information to justify claims/positions in their response

STEP TWO STEP THREE

Page 6: Common Core State Standards

Topic Question

Sacrifice - What is the progress of Mankind worth:

• Much sacrifice?• Some sacrifice?• Little or no sacrifice?

6

Page 7: Common Core State Standards

Predictive Writing

On your handout, record your answer to this question:

To what extent is Man’s progress worth personal sacrifice?

7

Page 8: Common Core State Standards

Prometheus

8

Page 9: Common Core State Standards

Vocabulary

Words introduced in the text:

– fortify/fortified fort = strong

– plummet plumb = vertical line to measure

– revolt re = against vol = to turn

– immortal im = not mort = death

– competitor com = with/together or = one who

– afflict af = toward flict= to beat/knock

– gaunt– liberate liber = free

9

Place words on interactive vocabulary word wall.

Page 10: Common Core State Standards

Text MarkingCodes to mark the text:

N – NeedS – SacrificeP – Progress for Mankind

Directions:• Teacher models use of the codes to mark the text.• Students read and mark their text.

10

Page 11: Common Core State Standards

Text Marking

NEXT: Partner Discussion

Compare and discuss differences in your text-marking:

How did you code/mark your text differently than your partner?

11

Page 12: Common Core State Standards

Directed Note-taking

12

Directed Note Taking: PrometheusGuiding Question:

Who had the greatest impact, and what was that character’s motive? Paragraph # NOTES Insert a relevant word under appropriate category .

Action Character Quality MotivePage 3,

paragraph 17EXAMPLE: Prometheus said, “Mankind shall have fire.” Determination To help man

Page 13: Common Core State Standards

Directed Note-taking

13

NEXT: Prioritize your notes• Place a star next to your most significant note

THEN: Partner Discussion• Compare and discuss differences in your notes:

How do your notes differ from those of your partner?Do you think your partner’s most significant note has

been identified correctly?

Page 14: Common Core State Standards

Writing in Response to Reading

Answer the following questions on your handout:

Which characters made a personal sacrifice, and what did they sacrifice?

Which sacrifices brought progress to Mankind?

14

Page 15: Common Core State Standards

15

STEP ONE

Final Written Response to the Reading of the TextStudents compare their final written response to their previous written responses to see their growth in thinking across time.

Whole Group Categorizing of Questions

Engage in Collaborative Inquiry to: •search/locate answers to multiple significant questions generated by students•evaluate source/text information:

identify biasdetermine credibility & validity corroboration across sources

•post answers on Question/Answer Concept Board – ongoing process over time

Comprehension Instructional Sequence Timeline Text-Based Discussion on Essential Question(Efferent Discussion)

Model Question Generation – one of the most potent strategies

Directed Note-Taking during Reading #2: students identify relevant & significant text informationFollow-up Text-Based Discussion(Efferent)

Text-Marking during Reading #1: use a coding system that engages students in critical thinkingFollow-up Text-Based Discussion (Efferent discussion)

Topic Question andStrategic Use of Afferent Discussion Grasp the students’ interest

Predictive WritingBefore reading the article, or having text based discussion with their classmates, the students write briefly; this writing reveals the level of prior knowledge students regarding the topic. When they share their writing with each other, background knowledge for the topic will be developed.

Vocabulary Instruction: •Morphemic analysis•Contextual analysis•Both

Student Question Generation during Reading #3All students generate relevant questions on post-it notes to place on poster

Ongoing Collaborative

Inquiry Ongoing

Question & Answer Concept Board

Written Response to Reading

Students use what they have learned from their first and second text-reading, text-based discussions, & note-taking to write a response to the question:•Students use text information to justify claims/positions in their response

STEP TWO STEP THREE

Page 16: Common Core State Standards

Question Generation

Generate questions yet unanswered from your previous reading and rereading of the text:

What questions are you still wondering about?

Record your questions on the Question Generation handout.

Question Generation: PrometheusParagraph # QUESTIONS Check the relevant category.

Action Character Quality MotiveP 2, par 12 EXAMPLE: What are zephyrs?

16

Page 17: Common Core State Standards

Question Generation

17

NEXT: Prioritize your questions• Place a star next to your most significant question that is most

relevant to the topic of the text.

THEN: Small Group Discussion• Compare and discuss differences in your questions:

How do your questions differ?Do you think your group members have accurately

identified their most significant and relevant question?

Page 18: Common Core State Standards

18

STEP ONE

Final Written Response to the Reading of the TextStudents compare their final written response to their previous written responses to see their growth in thinking across time.

Whole Group Categorizing of Questions

Engage in Collaborative Inquiry to: •search/locate answers to multiple significant questions generated by students•evaluate source/text information:

identify biasdetermine credibility & validity corroboration across sources

•post answers on Question/Answer Concept Board – ongoing process over time

Comprehension Instructional Sequence Timeline Text-Based Discussion on Essential Question(Efferent Discussion)

Model Question Generation – one of the most potent strategies

Directed Note-Taking during Reading #2: students identify relevant & significant text informationFollow-up Text-Based Discussion(Efferent)

Text-Marking during Reading #1: use a coding system that engages students in critical thinkingFollow-up Text-Based Discussion (Efferent discussion)

Topic Question andStrategic Use of Afferent Discussion Grasp the students’ interest

Predictive WritingBefore reading the article, or having text based discussion with their classmates, the students write briefly; this writing reveals the level of prior knowledge students regarding the topic. When they share their writing with each other, background knowledge for the topic will be developed.

Vocabulary Instruction: •Morphemic analysis•Contextual analysis•Both

Student Question Generation during Reading #3All students generate relevant questions on post-it notes to place on poster

Ongoing Collaborative

Inquiry Ongoing

Question & Answer Concept Board

Written Response to Reading

Students use what they have learned from their first and second text-reading, text-based discussions, & note-taking to write a response to the question:•Students use text information to justify claims/positions in their response

STEP TWO STEP THREE

Page 19: Common Core State Standards

Question GenerationNEXT: Classify and post your questions

Place the most significant and relevant questions in the appropriate column on the Class Question Generation Poster.

CLASS QUESTION GENERATION POSTERPrometheus

Action/Event Character Quality Motive Other

19

Page 20: Common Core State Standards

Question Generation

20

REORGANIZE QUESTIONS: Sort questions by resources needed

Which questions will require additional resources to locate their answers?

CLASS QUESTION GENERATION POSTERPrometheus

Action/Event Character Quality Motive Other

Addi

tiona

lRe

sour

ces What role did zephyrs

play in Greek mythology?

What other qualities does Zeusdisplay in other Greek myths?

Clas

sTe

xt

Page 21: Common Core State Standards

From Question Generation to Research

OVER TIME: Refer to Question Generation Poster to engage in collaborative inquiry

21

CLASS TEXT: Which sections of text contain answers to posted questions?

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: Do the resources we have located answer the

questions partially or fully? Is a diverse collection of media resources needed to

locate information sufficient for developing answers that are more complete?

Page 22: Common Core State Standards

22

STEP ONE

Final Written Response to the Reading of the TextStudents compare their final written response to their previous written responses to see their growth in thinking across time.

Whole Group Categorizing of Questions

Engage in Collaborative Inquiry to: •search/locate answers to multiple significant questions generated by students•evaluate source/text information:

identify biasdetermine credibility & validity corroboration across sources

•post answers on Question/Answer Concept Board – ongoing process over time

Comprehension Instructional Sequence Timeline Text-Based Discussion on Essential Question(Efferent Discussion)

Model Question Generation – one of the most potent strategies

Directed Note-Taking during Reading #2: students identify relevant & significant text informationFollow-up Text-Based Discussion(Efferent)

Text-Marking during Reading #1: use a coding system that engages students in critical thinkingFollow-up Text-Based Discussion (Efferent discussion)

Topic Question andStrategic Use of Afferent Discussion Grasp the students’ interest

Predictive WritingBefore reading the article, or having text based discussion with their classmates, the students write briefly; this writing reveals the level of prior knowledge students regarding the topic. When they share their writing with each other, background knowledge for the topic will be developed.

Vocabulary Instruction: •Morphemic analysis•Contextual analysis•Both

Student Question Generation during Reading #3All students generate relevant questions on post-it notes to place on poster

Ongoing Collaborative

Inquiry Ongoing

Question & Answer Concept Board

Written Response to Reading

Students use what they have learned from their first and second text-reading, text-based discussions, & note-taking to write a response to the question:•Students use text information to justify claims/positions in their response

STEP TWO STEP THREE

Page 23: Common Core State Standards

Extended Text DiscussionThink about the following questions:

Which characters made a personal sacrifice, and what did they sacrifice?

Which personal sacrifices brought progress to Mankind?

Was this progress to Mankind worth these personal sacrifices, and why was it worth it?

Share your response with a partner, using evidence from text to support your answer.

23

Page 24: Common Core State Standards

Final Writing in Response to Reading

According to the text, what progress for Mankind was worth personal sacrifice, and why?

Use evidence from text to support your answer.

24