Comment 3 - Ukraine-EU Momentum Should Not Be Wasted - Viktoria Berezhets'Ka
-
Upload
viktoria-berezhetskaya -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Comment 3 - Ukraine-EU Momentum Should Not Be Wasted - Viktoria Berezhets'Ka
![Page 1: Comment 3 - Ukraine-EU Momentum Should Not Be Wasted - Viktoria Berezhets'Ka](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022021117/577d24ef1a28ab4e1e9dbe2e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
8/3/2019 Comment 3 - Ukraine-EU Momentum Should Not Be Wasted - Viktoria Berezhets'Ka
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comment-3-ukraine-eu-momentum-should-not-be-wasted-viktoria-berezhetska 1/1
Viktoria Berezhets’ka, 17/01/1989, City University of Seattle (VSM), [email protected] 2011
My comment on the article named “ Ukraine-EU momentum should not be wasted ” by Kostiantyn Yelisieiev http://euobserver.com/7/113950
Historically, Ukraine was viewed as a border between West and East. Recently, Ukraine wasstuck between Russia and EU. As soon as country turned West, the time of elections came andeverything changed. This year was hard and unstable for Ukraine. At first, crisis hit the country,then political instability, and now the Ukraine-EU momentum along with Tymoshenko trial. Whereare we heading?
Current situation is not under control. Indeed, Ukraine faced a dilemma. People are willing tohead West, economy seems to be ready for moving on, and government was ready to make a
serious step toward EU. If we are not going to take the step now, will we have a chance to take itlater? We might get another chance. However, the possible EU membership is a two-side medal.
On one hand, Ukrainians would get an opportunity to travel abroad freely. They would beable to get education and job abroad. From economical perspective, Ukraine would get a chance toincrease trade. Moreover, EU considers Eastern Europeans countries less economically developedand, therefore, provides those with subsidies. Of course, the costs would be taken from the membercountries but alternative ways can always be found. Another advantage is the fact that along withthe increased levels of bureaucracy the magnificent amount of decisions would be made byqualified majority voting in the Council of the European Union. All these facts would make life inUkraine better and easier for people. Moreover, the political games and corruption would cease toexist.
On the other hand, it would be a problem for Ukraine to adjust to new trade patterns. Withfree movement of labor and capital many skilled workers might choose going to West instead of staying in Ukraine. Moreover, the agricultural reforms would take place, and might bring certainproblems to the agricultural/farming sector of the country. One of the most important issues is a lessof independence of the country in many areas. Nevertheless, since Tymoshenko trial is taking place,the situation is getting more and more unstable. Ukraine is risking to lose its independence and
democracy on all levels and in all areas. So should the Ukraine-EU momentum be wasted?It is absolutely unacceptable for the country leader, the head of the government, and the face
of the nation to make decisions which might cut out Ukraine from the reasonable part of the world.It is unacceptable to ignore the requests of the world leaders to reconsider the decision aboutTymoshenko imprisonement. Finally, it is unacceptable to waste the Ukraine – EU momentum. Infact, what Ukraine faces now is a withdrawal which Mr.Yelisieiev mentioned in his article.