Urea SCR and DPF System for Deisel Sport Utility Vehicle ...
Combination and Integration of DPF-SCR Aftertreatment Technologies
Transcript of Combination and Integration of DPF-SCR Aftertreatment Technologies
Combination and Integration of
DPF – SCR Aftertreatment Technologies
Kenneth G. Rappé Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)
May 16, 2012 ACE025
This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
OVERVIEW
Start – Oct 2008 Finish – Sept 2012
Barriers addressed Heavy truck thermal efficiency Cost effective emission control Combined NOx and PM emissions
• Total planned project funding – $1.6M DOE share – $1.6M I.K. Contractor share
• $875K received through FY11
Timeline
Budget
Barriers
• Primary Partner: PACCAR • PACCAR Technical Center
• DAF Trucks (operating as an extension of PACCAR) • Utrecht Univ. supporting DAF
• Project Lead: PNNL
Partners
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
RELEVANCE
Objective is to fundamentally understand the integration of SCR & DPF technologies for HDD Determine system limitations, define basic requirements for efficient/effective operation and integration with engine
Develop an understanding of … optimal loading of SCR catalyst for maximizing NOx reduction while maintaining acceptable ∆P and filtration performance proper thermal and reactive management of the system for efficient NOx reduction along with maximizing passive soot oxidation capacity
Motivation for integration: to target a reduction of cost and volume of the engine aftertreatment systems via inclusion of SCR and DPF functionalities into a single entity.
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
MILESTONES Demonstrate integrated DPF/SCR on 2 cm dia. elevated porosity filter (19 mo.) – complete
Discussions with manufacturer on pathway to fabricate integrated DPF/SCR for vehicle demonstration (33 mo.) – complete
Demonstrate performance of an integrated DPF/SCR system on an elevated porosity wall-flow filter sample on a diesel engine exhaust slip stream (39 mo.) – complete
Demonstrate a 15+ cm diameter coated wall flow integrated DPF/SCR system can be prepared that has similar dispersion of catalyst(s) as a ~2 cm diameter wall flow coated filter – later this year
Demonstrate performance of an integrated DPF/SCR wall-flow filter on diesel engine (48 mo.) – later this year [engine (DAF) and truck** (PACCAR)]; **pending successful engine demonstration
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
APPROACH/STRATEGY First key barrier to successful system implementation: ∆P
Solutions: 1. Higher porosity substrate 2. Refined wash-coating technique
1. High porosity (UHP) substrate Cordierite: Corning developmental UHP substrate Aspiring to include SiC, ACM in engine slip-stream investigations
2. BASF refined wash coating technology Multiple iterations of coated parts acquired for study Good working relationship with BASF’s HD Systems R&D group
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
APPROACH/STRATEGY Highly evolving field of work (mostly LDD, some HDD)* This effort currently focused on:
Optimizing SCR catalyst washcoat Facilitating passive soot oxidation
Working relationship with BASF (HD Systems Development) SCR catalyst (Cu/Z) expertise Washcoating, manufacturability UHP cordierite substrate sample coating (cores, bricks)
Flow restriction concerns ∆P: SCR/DPF > SCR + cDPF (demonstrated by prior efforts)
Maximize NOx reduction performance, maximize PM filtration performance, and minimize flow restriction simultaneously is the challenge
*see back-up slides for overview of recent field of work
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
TECHNICAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 1 2 3 4 5
Pres
sure
Dro
p, k
Pa
Accumulated Soot, g/L
∆P after initial loading phase~11.5 kPa @ ~0.5 g/L soot
Upstream 90 g/L SCR catalyst
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 1 2 3 4 5Pr
essu
re D
rop,
kPa
Accumulated Soot, g/L
∆P after initial loading phase~3.2 kPa @ ~0.38 g/L soot
Downstream 90 g/L SCR catalyst
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 1 2 3 4 5
Pres
sure
Dro
p, k
Pa
Accumulated Soot, g/L
∆P after initial loading phase~7.4 kPa @ ~0.36 g/L soot
Downstream 150 g/L SCR catalyst
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 1 2 3 4 5
Pres
sure
Dro
p, k
Pa
Accumulated Soot, g/L
∆P after initial loading phase~20.5 kPa @ ~0.52 g/L soot
Upstream
150 g/L SCR Catalyst
(2003 Jetta, ~300°C, 55k GHSV)
Both amount and location of SCR catalyst have measureable significant impact on dynamic permeability of filter during soot loading
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
TECHNICAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Modeling of wall-scale transport effects
Single flat wall with exhaust approaching in the normal direction Channel scale transport effects & axial variations are ignored Simplified SCR reaction network developed at PNNL for current Cu-CHA SCR catalyst Commercial flow-through parts used to develop SCR model loaded to ~170 g/L Simplified porous media with similar porosity and tortuosity of the SCRF used in experiments 90 g/L of catalyst distributed evenly throughout the porous wall + 60 g/L placed on down-stream wall surface Soot oxidation kinetic model by Messerer et al, 2006 Assumed fresh (very reactive) soot Conclusions dependent upon validity of assumptions and kinetics used
350°
C 4 g/L soot
150 g/L catalyst 500 ppm NO2 500 ppm NO
35,000 GHSV ANR = 1
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
TECHNICAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Modeling of wall-scale transport effects
SCR reduces soot oxidation rate by lowering upstream NO2 concentrations A mild NO2 gradient exists across the porous SCRF wall, indicating that catalyst placement on the downstream side of the wall is somewhat advantageous
With SCR NO2 [ppm] NO [ppm] NO2 rate
Outlet: 6 ppm NO2 46 ppm NO 33 ppm NH3
Soot oxidation: 8.9 g/s L NOx reduction: 95%
No SCR NO2 [ppm] NO [ppm]
Outlet: 40 ppm NO2 960 ppm NO
Soot oxidation: 11.3 g/s L NOx reduction: 0%
NH3 [ppm]
40 ppm 28 ppm
12 ppm
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
TECHNICAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Pulsed Oxidation Studies – 150 g/L SCR catalyst
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
320
360
400
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
63 75 87 99 111 123 135 147 159
[CO
2+CO
], pp
m; T
empe
ratu
re, °
C
dP, r
elat
ive;
NRE
Time, relative
w/o
SCR
w/o
SCR
w/S
CR
w/S
CR
w/S
CR
~280°C ~320°C ~350°C
w/o
SCR
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
320
360
400
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
32 42 52 62 72 82 92
[CO
2+CO
], pp
m; T
empe
ratu
re, °
C
dP, r
elat
ive;
NRE
Time, relativew
/o S
CR
w/o
SCR
w/o
SCR
w/S
CR
w/
SCR
w/S
CR
~280°C ~320°C ~350°C
200 ppm NO2 500 ppm NO2
Effect of NO2 concentration – 200 ppm (left) versus 500 ppm (right) 1000 ppm NOx, ANR = 1, 35k GHSV Increased NO2 minimizes PSO-inhibiting effect of SCR processes
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
TECHNICAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Pulsed Oxidation Studies
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
320
360
400
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
61 68 75 82 89 96 103 110 117
[CO
2+CO
], pp
m; T
empe
ratu
re, °
C
dP, r
elat
ive;
NRE
Time, relative
w/o
SCR
w/o
SCR
w/S
CR
w/
SCR
w/
SCR
~280°C ~320°C ~350°C
w/o
SCR
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
320
360
400
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
32 42 52 62 72 82 92
[CO
2+CO
], pp
m; T
empe
ratu
re, °
C
dP, r
elat
ive;
NRE
Time, relativew
/o S
CR
w/o
SCR
w/o
SCR
w/S
CR
w/
SCR
w/S
CR
~280°C ~320°C ~350°C
90 g/L SCR catalyst 150 g/L SCR catalyst
Effect of catalyst loading – 90 g/L (left) versus 150 g/L (right) 500 ppm NO2, 1000 ppm NOX, ANR = 1, 35k GHSV Increased PSO observed <350°
C with 90 g/L versus 150 g/L
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
100 200 300 400 500
Pres
sure
Dro
p, re
lativ
e
Temperature, °C
90 g/L catalyst; 500 ppm NO2; 35k GHSV
NO2/NOx=0.33; PSO+SCRNO2/NOx=0.33; PSONO2/NOx=0.5; PSO+SCRNO2/NOx=0.5; PSO
SCR - selective catalytic reductionPSO - passive soot oxidation
TECHNICAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS TPO – Temperature Programmed Oxidation
Negligible impact of NO2/NOx fraction <0.5
Passive soot oxidation retardation ~40°
C
4 g/L soot loading ANR = 1
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
200 250 300 350 400 450 500
NRE
Temperature, °C
NO2/NOx = 0.33NO2/NOx = 0.5
90 g/L catalyst
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
100 200 300 400 500
Pres
sure
Dro
p, re
lativ
e
Temperature, °C
150 g/L catalyst; 500 ppm NO2; 35k GHSV
NO2/NOx=0.5; PSO+SCRNO2/NOx=0.5; PSONO2/NOx=0.65; PSO+SCRNO2/NOx=0.65; PSO
SCR - selective catalytic reductionPSO - passive soot oxidation
TECHNICAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS TPO – Temperature Programmed Oxidation
Significantly less retardation of passive soot oxidation at NO2/NOx fraction >0.5
ANR = 1 4 g/L soot loading
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
200 250 300 350 400 450 500
NRE
Temperature, °C
NO2/NOx = 0.5NO2/NOx = 0.65
150 g/L catalyst
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
100 200 300 400 500
Pres
sure
Dro
p, re
lativ
e
Temperature, °C
NO2/NOx = 0.5; 500 ppm NO2; 35k GHSV
150 g/L - PSO+SCR150 g/L - PSO90 g/L - PSO+SCR90 g/L - PSO
SCR - selective catalytic reductionPSO - passive soot oxidation
TECHNICAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS
90 g/L SCR catalyst exhibits less retardation of PSO (~40°
C) versus 150
g/L (~60°
C)
Indicates potential optimum catalyst loading target exists for facilitating PSO
ANR = 1
TPO – Temperature Programmed Oxidation
4 g/L soot loading
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
200 250 300 350 400 450 500
NRE
Temperature, °C
150 g/L90 g/L
NO2/NOx = 0.5
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
TECHNICAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Diesel engine slipstream testing **
Balance point temperature (BPT) analysis; 60 g/L SCR catalyst ANR = 0 (i.e. no SCR reaction); BPT ~ 360°C
300 ppm NOx
NO2/NOx ~40% ~73k GHSV
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0 20 40 60 80 100
Tem
pera
ture
, °C
Pres
sure
Dro
p, in
ches
H2O
Time, min
** See technical back-up slides for experimental configuration
Comparing to tested DAF engine + aftertreatment High NOx engine-out settings: 300 ppm NOx; 40% NO2; BPT 340–360°
C
Low NOx engine-out settings: 150 ppm NOx; 40% NO2; BPT 380–400
C
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 20 40 60 80 100Te
mpe
ratu
re, °
C
Pres
sure
Dro
p, in
ches
H2O
Time, min
TECHNICAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Diesel engine slipstream testing
Balance point temperature (BPT) analysis ; 60 g/L SCR catalyst ANR = 1.0; BPT ~ 440°C
SCR reaction exhibits significant retarding effect on PSO process
@ ANR = 1: BPT > ~80°
C
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
200 300 400 500 600N
RETemperature, °C
ANR = 1
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
TECHNICAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Diesel engine slipstream testing
Balance point temperature (BPT) analysis ; 60 g/L SCR catalyst ANR = 0.85; BPT ~ 400°C Slight benefiting effect
of ANR adjustment for improving PSO in presence of SCR
@ ANR = 0.85: BPT > ~40°
C
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
200 300 400 500 600N
RETemperature, °C
ANR = 0.85ANR = 1200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
10 30 50 70 90 110Te
mpe
ratu
re, °
C
Pres
sure
Dro
p, in
ches
H2O
Time, min
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
COLLABORATIONS
Partners PACCAR & DAF Trucks (Industry): CRADA partner, provide engine and exhaust data used in experimental study; monthly teleconferences discussing progress and results of work
University of Utrecht (Academic): linking active site characteristics of developmental zeolites to deNOx activity and selectivity, characterizing deactivation phenomena; monthly teleconference participant discussing progress and results of research
BASF (Industry): integrated SCR/DPF parts supplier, providing wash-coating expertise and 2012 production SCR catalyst active phase
Corning (Industry): developmental high porosity cordierite supplier
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
FUTURE WORK (2012) Continue system kinetic and performance investigations
Both simulated exhaust and on engine slipstream Detailed examination of SCR & PSO interactions Evaluation of reductant dosing strategies for improving PSO
e.g. passive-active regeneration strategies
Full-scale engine testing beginning now Parts in hand, integrated with engine Three configurations investigated on engine
Reference – typical US2010 DOC–CDPF–SCR system System 1 – typical US2010 DOC + SCRF #1 System 2 – typical US2010 DOC + SCRF #2 NOTE: DOC specification can be changed based upon
NO to NO2 conversion efficiency
Testing consisting of the following Passive & active soot oxidation under non-SCR conditions Passive & active soot oxidation evaluation under SCR conditions NOx reduction efficiency of SCRF system
Study to include Characterization after de-greening on-engine 4 hours Characterization after accelerated aging at 650°C 100 hours
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
SUMMARY Impact areas
Optimizing SCR catalyst washcoat Facilitating passive soot oxidation
Optimizing SCR catalyst washcoat Amount and location of SCR catalyst have measureable impact on dynamic permeability of filter and catalyst efficacy Desired location on downstream portion of filter within porous microstructure
Facilitating passive soot oxidation of SCR/DPF couple Maximize NO2 concentration and fraction (of total NOx) Possible optimum catalyst loading target for maximizing PSO
To be interrogated further on engine slip-stream configuration With catalyst optimization & passive-active regeneration strategies, definite potential for deployment of DPF/SCR system with significant passive soot oxidation capacity
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
TECHNICAL BACK-UP SLIDES
TECHNICAL BACK-UP SLIDES
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
RECENT FIELD OF WORK
GM (SAE 2011-01-1140) – integrated system able to meet cert. requirements w/ significant reduction in A/T volume; coating process & wash-coat loading need optimization; approach does not address passive soot oxidation feasibility. JM (SAE 2011-01-1312) – addressed passive soot oxidation feasibility by turning EGR off. SCR/DPF with EGR off (elevated NOx) demonstrated improved passive regeneration capability. Ford (SAE 2010-01-1183) – oven aging tests indicate DOC-SCRF-SCR configuration able to meet T2B5 tailpipe NOx standards through 120k miles. BASF (Boorse et al, DEER 2010) – operating window (NOx conv., dP) determined by porosity, PSD. Filter type, porosity determines catalyst utilization.
Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation
May 16, 2012
PNNL/PACCAR DPF–SCR AFTERTREATMENT INTEGRATION
ON-ENGINE SLIPSTREAM TESTING Engine operated steady-state Catalyst temperature increased via furnace
Oxycat
Heated CL NOx
AVL Smoke meter
NH3 dosing
Furnace DPF/SCR sample
T T
dP
Cummins ISB 235 5.9L