Colloque RI 2014 : Intervention de O.J. SAHLER, MD (Golisano Children’s Hospital, University of...
-
Upload
institut-national-du-cancer -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
182 -
download
0
Transcript of Colloque RI 2014 : Intervention de O.J. SAHLER, MD (Golisano Children’s Hospital, University of...
REDUCING EMOTIONAL DISTRESS IN MOTHERS OF CHILDREN RECENTLY
DIAGNOSED WITH CANCER
O.J. Sahler, MD
Professor of Pediatrics, Psychiatry, Medical Humanities, & Oncology
Golisano Children’s Hospital
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, NY USA
1
DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION,
AND DISSEMINATION
OF THE BRIGHT IDEAS
PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS TRAINING PROGRAM
2
From Science to Clinical Practice:
THE PRESENTER HAS NO
CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO DISCLOSE
3
1. Mothers of children newly diagnosed with cancer often haveincreased anxiety and depression
2. We have completed 3 RCTs proving the efficacy of the Bright IDEAS paradigm of problem-solving skills training in > 820 mothers
3. Adding skills building to a social support intervention continues to have positive effects 3 months after the intervention ends
4. Dissemination strategy: (a) train-the-trainer workshops to build capacity for using
Bright IDEAS at child cancer centers throughout the US(b) an on-line version of Bright IDEAS for 24/7 availability
4
Key Points
1986 - 2014
Supported by the WT Grant Foundation and
NCI/NIH Grants R25 CA65520, RO1 CA098954, and RO1 CA159013
Background
In the mid-1980’s, it was controversial if child cancer in the family was a traumatic or a growth experience for siblings
We developed a 7-site survey study
6
Conceptual Model: Childhood Cancer: Sibling Adaptation
7
Sibling Study
Interviewed parents of 279 siblings
• 270 respondents = mothers
• 9 respondents = fathers*
• We have focused on mothers in studies published to date
* Typical distribution of parental participation in open studies
8
RESULTS OF THE SIBLING STUDY
Sibling Adaptation
10
Mother’s Well-Being Using NHANES Comparison Data
11
Resource Utilization:Mothers seeking help for themselves past year
12
Hypothesis
• Mothers of siblings who were less well adapted would be isolated and have access to few resources
13
Resource Utilization:Mothers seeking help for themselves past year
14
Why?
Hypotheses:
1. Mothers could not define the problem well enough to access appropriate resources
2. Mothers could not implement advice they received
15
16
OUR SOLUTION
Problem-Solving Skills Training
• Based on Problem-Solving Therapy, which is effective in treating clinical depression, anxiety
• Skills training is a psychological intervention that teaches management of life stresses to a non-clinical population
Problem-Solving Program Goals
• Learn new ways to: - solve problems- resolve conflicts - make effective decisions
• Control the controllable
• Feel better during an extremely difficult time
• Understand the thinking-feeling connection
17
The Bright IDEAS Model
18
The Model
“Bright” = OPTIMISM
Adopting a positive attitude toward
solving problems
19
Step 1: Identify the Problem
• What is the problem?
• Where is this a problem?
• When does the problem occur?
• Who does the problem involve?
• Why does the problem occur?
• How do you feel when the problem occurs?
20
Step 2: Define Options
• Define possible solutions
• Brainstorm without judgment
• Be creative
• S- t- r- e- t- c- h yourself
21
Step 3: Evaluate Your Options
For each proposed solution, rate:
• Likelihood of achieving
• Time-effort commitment
• Short- and long-term cost/benefits
• Potential barriers
Rank your solutions
22
Step 4: Act
• Decide on first choice
• Create a specific detailed action plan
• Envision the plan mentally & write it out
• Then, do it!
23
Step 5: See If It Worked
• Assess if result was satisfactory
• If not satisfied, analyze why
• Modify the plan or try Plan B
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Currently, Bright IDEAS Is Provided Face-to-Face
Manualized training program
8 1-hour individual training sessions
Participant identifies problems to solve
Practice
Homework
33
Conceptual Model
34
Crisis Intervention Primary
Outcome
Secondary
Outcome
Diagnosis of
CancerPSST
Negative
Affectivity
(POMS/BDI/IES)
Problem-
Solving
Skills
(SPSI)
Non-Specific Effect
Specific
Effect
PSST Study Methods
35
Sahler OJZ, et al. Problem-solving skills training for mothers of children with newly diagnosed cancer: A randomized trial. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2002; 23:77-86. PMID: 11943969
Sahler OJ, et al. Using problem-solving skills training to reduce negative affectivity in mothers of children with newly diagnosed cancer: Report of a multi-site randomized trial . JCCP, 2005;73:272283.
Askins MA, et al. Report from a multi-institutional randomized clinical trial examining computer-assisted problem-solving skills training for English- and Spanish-speaking mothers of children with newly diagnosed cancer. JPP, 2009; 34(5):551-563.
Sahler OJ, et al. Specificity of problem-solving skills training in mothers of children newly diagnosed with cancer: Results of a multi-site randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol; 2013; 31(10):1329- 35. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
Eligibility Criteria
- Mothers of children with newly diagnosed cancer 2-16 weeks after diagnosis
- English, Spanish, Hebrew Language (2005 only)
Procedures
- Recruitment Time 1 Assessment Randomization PSST
Training Intervention (8 1-hr sessions)
- Time 2 Assessment (immediately post PSST or 3 mos. post T1)
- Time 3 Assessment (3 mos. post T2)
Assessments
- SPSI-R; POMS, BDI-II, IES-R
Sequence of PSST Studies
• Randomization Groups by Study
- 1995: Efficacy --- PSST vs. Usual Psychosocial Care (n = 92)
- 2005: PSST vs. Usual Psychosocial Care (n = 430)
- 2010: PSST vs. Reflective Listening (n = 301)
- 2013: f 2 f vs. Online (n = 620; to date >125 enrolled)
36
2005 Study (n = 430)
Mothers gaining more benefit
• Single
• Young
• Introverted
• Spanish immigrant
37
Differential Impact of PSST: English- vs. Spanish-Speaking Mothers
38
Relationships among Cultural Factors & Baseline Measures
Lower acculturation correlated with:• Poorer problem solving
Higher immigrant stress correlated with:
• Depressive symptoms
• Traumatic stress symptoms
Sherman-Bien, et al. “A cross-cultural perspective of mothers of children with newly diagnosed cancer: Results of multi-institutional randomized trials of maternal problem-solving skills training”. International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP), Boston, Massachusetts, October 21, 2010.
39
Conclusions about PSST and Spanish-speaking Mothers
• Cultural factors predict both psychosocial functioning and problem-solving skills at baseline
• Interventions for specific cultural groups need to incorporate culturally sensitive approaches relevant to mothers’ unique experiences
PSST can be effective for any cultural group
40
Take Away Point:
Problem-Solving Skills Training is generic and culturally neutral
but…
the specific problems and solutions individuals focus on are culturally determined
41
Overall Study Conclusions
• PSST effectively teaches problem-solving skills to mothers of children with cancer
• PSST reduces maternal depression and increases sense of competence
•Differences between PSST and control groupsdiminish over time as control mothers improveconfidence/competence
42
Trajectory of Negative Affectivity
43
Next Step
• Replicate with time and attention control to measure the role of non-specific (social) support
44
Conceptual Model
45
Crisis Intervention Primary
Outcome
Secondary
Outcome
Diagnosis of
CancerPSST
Negative
Affectivity
(POMS/BDI/IES)
Problem-
Solving
Skills
(SPSI)
Non-Specific Effect
Specific
Effect
Time and Attention Control Condition (TACC)
Non-Directive Support (Reflective Listening)8 1-hour sessions
ManualizedProcess and Content
1. Reflection2. Focus on Feelings3. Empathetic4. Accept affective experiences5. Supportive statements
46
Hypothesis
Mothers receiving PSST would have:
Problem-solving skills
Negative affectivity
47
2010 Study (n = 301)Results: PSST vs. TACC
1. No differences in subjects’ ratings --- both interventions seen as potentially useful
2. Problem-solving skills were significantly improved in PSST mothers
3. Both groups showed significant improvement in affectivity at T2 (immediately post intervention)
48
But…
3 months after the intervention
Mothers in the PSST Group continued to improve at a significantly greater rate than mothers in the TACC Group
49
PSST LESS DISTRESS OVER TIME
50
If you give a man a fish,
you feed him for a day
If you teach a man to fish,
you feed him for a lifetime
51
In 2010, data from Bright IDEAS RCTs
were independently analyzed:
Research Integrity 4.4/5.0
Dissemination Capability 5.0/5.0
Intervention Impact 2.0/5.0
52
was designated
a Research-Tested Intervention Program (RTIP) by NCI
53
Our impact score of 2.0 reflects
the very low incidence (~12,000) of new child cancer diagnoses/yr
Our dissemination capability score of 5.0 reflects
comprehensive product development
54
In reality:
Bright IDEAS is a generic approach to problem solving that can be used
• by anyone• at any time• under any circumstance• for any problem
55
The Challenge:
…Disseminate!
…Disseminate!
…Disseminate!
56
The Problem:
The intervention is labor intensive and requires trained personnel
57
The Solutions:#1: Build capacity: Train 200 psychologists, nurses, and social workers to increase the number of skilled providers
#2: Increase accessibility: Put Bright IDEAS online (PC and App)
58
The Question:
Will ePSST be as effective as f2f PSST?
59
OR…
If you give a man a rod and reel
and an instruction book,
will he learn to fish as well by himself
as he would if you were
standing next to him coaching him?
60
Thank you to my many colleagues
• Martha A. Askins, PhD UT/MD Anderson Cancer Center
• Oscar A. Barbarin, PhD University of Michigan
• Robert W. Butler, PhD Oregon Health Sciences Center
• Donna R. Copeland, PhD UT/MD Anderson Cancer Center
• Katie A. Devine, PhD Rutgers University
• Michael J. Dolgin, PhD Ariel University (Israel)
• Diane L. Fairclough, DrPH University of Colorado Denver
• Ernest R. Katz, PhD Children’s Hospital, Los Angeles
• Raymond K. Mulhern, PhD St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital
• Robert B. Noll, PhD Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh
• Sean Phipps, PhD St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital
• Klaus J. Roghmann, PhD University of Rochester
• Janice R. Sargent, PhD University of Utah
• Sandra Sherman-Bien, PhD Miller Children’s Hospital
• James W. Varni, PhD University of California San Diego
• Lonnie K. Zeltzer, MD University of California Los Angeles
•
61
62