Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection
description
Transcript of Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection
![Page 1: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection
J. F. Drake
University of Marylandpresented in honor of
Professor Eric Priest September 8, 2003
![Page 2: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Collisionless reconnection is ubiquitous
• Inductive electric fields typically exceed the Dreicer runaway field– classical collisions and resistivity not important
• Earth’s magnetosphere– magnetopause
– magnetotail
• Solar corona– solar flares
• Laboratory plasma– sawteeth
• astrophysical systems?
![Page 3: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Resistive MHD Description
• Formation of macroscopic Sweet-Parker layer
•Slow reconnection•sensitive to resistivity•macroscopic nozzle
V ~ ( /L) CA ~ (A/r)1/2 CA << CA
• Petschek-like open outflow configuration does not appear in resistive MHD models with constant resistivity (Biskamp ‘86)
![Page 4: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Singular magnetic island equilibria
• Allow reconnection to produce a finite magnetic island ( )• Shut off reconnection ( = 0) and evolve to relaxed state
– Formation of singular current sheet
• Equilibria which form as a consequence of reconnection are singular – Waelbroeck’s ribbon is generic– Sweet-Parker current layers reflect this underlying singularity
• Generic consequence of flux conservation and requirement that magnetic energy is reduced
€
≠0
![Page 5: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Limitations of the MHD Model
• Reconnection rates too slow to explain observations– solar flares– sawtooth crash– magnetospheric substorms
• Some form of anomalous resistivity is often invoked to explain discrepancies– strong electron-ion streaming near x-line drives turbulence and
associated enhanced electron-ion drag– observational evidence in magnetosphere
• Non-MHD physics at small spatial scales produces fast reconnection– coupling to dispersive waves critical– Results seem to scale to large systems
• Mechanism for strong particle heating during reconnection?
![Page 6: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Kinetic Reconnection
• Coupling to dispersive waves in dissipation region at small scales produces fast magnetic reconnection– rate of reconnection independent of the mechanism which breaks
the frozen-in condition
– fast reconnection even for very large systems• no macroscopic nozzle
• no dependence on inertial scales
![Page 7: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Generalized Ohm’s Law
• Electron equation of motion
•MHD valid at large scales•Below c/pi or s electron and ion motion decouple
•electrons frozen-in•whistler and kinetic Alfven waves control dynamics
•not Alfven waves•Electron frozen-in condition broken below c/pe
c/pic/pes scales
Jpne1
BJnec1
Bvc1
EdtJd4
ei2pe
rrrrrrr
−∇+×−×+=π
Electroninertia
whistlerwaves
kinetic Alfvenwaves
![Page 8: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Kinetic Reconnection
• Ion motion decouples from that of the electrons at a distance from the x-line– coupling to whistler and kinetic Alfven waves
• Electron velocity from x-line limited by peak phase speed of whistler– exceeds Alfven speed
c/pi
![Page 9: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
GEM Reconnection Challenge
• National collaboration to explore reconnection with a variety of codes– MHD, two-fluid, hybrid, full-particle
• nonlinear tearing mode in a 1-D Harris current sheet
Bx = B0 tanh(x/w)
w = 0.5 c/pi
• Birn, et al., JGR, 2001, and companion papers
![Page 10: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Rates of Magnetic Reconnection
• Rate of reconnection is the slope of the versus t curve• all models which include the Hall term in Ohm’s law yield essentially
identical rates of reconnection• MHD reconnection is too slow by orders of magnitude
Birn, et al., 2001
![Page 11: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Why is wave dispersion important?
• Quadratic dispersion character
~ k2
Vp ~ k– smaller scales have higher velocities
– weaker dissipation leads to higher outflow speeds
– flux from x-line ~vw
» insensitive to dissipation
:
![Page 12: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Whistler signature
• Magnetic field from particle simulation (Pritchett, UCLA)
•Self generated out-of-plane field is whistler signature
![Page 13: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Observational Support for Whistler Wave Role in Reconnection
• Recent encounter of Wind spacecraft with reconnection site in the Earth’s magnetotail (Oeierset, et al., 2001)
![Page 14: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Magnetic Field Data from Wind
• Out-of-plane
magnetic fields seen as expected from standing whistler
![Page 15: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Conditions for Dispersive waves
• Geometry
• whistler
• kinetic Alfven
Api
y Ckc
k
= =
spi
y Ckc
k
= =
y0
0y kB
Bk ==
![Page 16: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Parameter space for dispersive waves
• Parameters
1
1
y
none
whistlerwhistlerkinetic Alfven
kinetic Alfven
2y0y B/nT4π=
i
e2
y0
20
m
m
B
B)1( +=
•For sufficiently large guide field have slow reconnection
Rogers, et al, 2001
![Page 17: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Fast versus slow reconnection
• Structure of the dissipation region with strong guide field– Out of plane current
No dispersive waves
With dispersive waves
![Page 18: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Fast Reconnection in Large Systems•Large scale hybrid simulation
T= 160 -1
T= 220 -1
•Kinetic models yield Petschek-like open outflow configuration•No large scale nozzle in kinetic reconnection
•Rate of reconnection insensitive to system size vi ~ 0.1 CA
![Page 19: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
3-D Magnetic Reconnection
• Turbulence, anomalous resistivity and energetic particle production– self-generated gradients in pressure and current near x-line and slow shocks
may drive turbulence– particle energization from turbulent particle acceleration?
• In a system with anti-parallel magnetic fields secondary instabilities play only a minor role– current layer near x-line is completely stable
• Strong secondary instabilities in systems with a guide field – strong electron streaming near x-line leads to Buneman instability and evolves
into nonlinear state with strong localized parallel electric fields produced by “electron-holes” and lower hybrid waves
– resulting electron scattering produces strong anomalous resistivity and electron heating
![Page 20: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Observational evidence for turbulence
• There is strong observational support that the dissipation region becomes strongly turbulent during reconnection– Earth’s magnetopause
• broad spectrum of E and B fluctuations
– Sawtooth crash in laboratory tokamaks• strong fluctuations peaked at the x-line
– Magnetic fluctuations in Magnetic Reconnection eXperiment (MRX)
![Page 21: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
• Particle simulation with 670 million particles
• Bz=5.0 Bx, mi/me=100
• Development of strong current layer– Buneman instability evolves into electron holes
3-D Magnetic Reconnection: with guide field
y
x
![Page 22: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Buneman Instability
• Electron-Ion two stream instability
• Electrostatic instability– (me/mi)1/3
pe
– k de ~ 1
– Vd ~ 1.8Vte
Initial Conditions:
Vd = 4.0 cA
Vte = 2.0 cA x
z
Ez
![Page 23: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Formation of Electron holes
• Intense electron beam generates Buneman instability– nonlinear evolution into “electron holes”
• localized regions of intense positive potential and associated bipolar parallel electric field
x
z
Ez
B
![Page 24: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Electron Holes
• Localized region of positive potential in three space dimensions– ion and electron dynamics essential– dynamic structures (spontaneously form, grow and die)– Parallel electric fields in collisionless plasma are not uniformly
distributed along B• Dissipation occurs in 3-D localized structures
B
![Page 25: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Electron Energization
vx
vzElectron Distribution Functions
Scattered electrons
Accelerated electrons
B
![Page 26: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Anomalous drag on electrons
• Parallel electric field scatter electrons producing effective drag
• Average over fluctuations along z direction to produce a mean field electron momentum equation
– correlation between density and electric field fluctuations yields drag
• Normalized electron drag
€
∂p ez
∂t= −en0 Ez − e⟨˜ n ˜ E z⟩
€
Dz =c⟨˜ n ˜ E z⟩n0vAB0
![Page 27: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
• Drag Dz has complex spatial and temporal structure with positive and negative values
• Results not consistent with the quasilinear model
Electron drag due to scattering by parallel electric fields
y
x
![Page 28: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Observational evidence
• Electron holes and double layers have long been observed in the auroral region of the ionosphere– Temerin, et al. 1982, Mozer, et al. 1997– Auroral dynamics are not linked to magnetic
reconnection
• Recent observations suggest that such structures form in essentially all of the boundary layers present in the Earth’s magnetosphere– magnetotail, bow shock, magnetopause
• Electric field measurements from the Polar spacecraft indicate that electron-holes are always present at the magnetopause (Cattell, et al. 2002)
![Page 29: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
• d
Intense currents
Kivelson et al., 1995
![Page 30: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Satellite observations of electron
holes
• Magnetopause observations from the Polar
spacecraft (Cattell, et al.,
2002)
![Page 31: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Theory/observational comparison of E ||
Polar observations(data exhibits both hole
polarities)
Simulation data
z
![Page 32: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Scaling of electron holes
• Scale size Lh
• Velocity Vh
€
⇒ Lh = 2πVh
ω pe
mi
me
⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟
1/ 3
![Page 33: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
E-hole scaling: comparison with Polar data
• Polar data from 5 magnetopause crossings– Direct measurements of Vh and Lh
– Compare with theory prediction• Reasonable agreement
• High velocity holes have larger scale lengths
![Page 34: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Conclusions
• Fast reconnection requires either the coupling to dispersive waves at small scales or a mechanism for anomalous resistivity
• Coupling to dispersive waves– rate independent of the mechanism which breaks the frozen-in
condition
– Can have fast reconnection with a guide field
• Turbulence and anomalous resistivity– strong electron beams near the x-line drive Buneman instability
– nonlinear evolution into “electron holes” and lower hybrid waves• seen in the ionospheric and magnetospheric satellite measurements
• Generic mechanism for dissipating wave and magnetic field energy in nearly collisionless plasma systems?
– Can MHD turbulence produce fast reconnection?
![Page 35: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Collaborators
• M.A. Shay• M. Swisdak• B. D. Jemella
• B. N. Rogers
• A. Zeiler
• C. Cattell
University of Maryland
Dartmouth College
IPP-Garching
University of Minnesota
![Page 36: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
′0004.0=
-Elongated current layer increases in length with tearing mode stability parameter .′
Structure of Current layer in resistive MHD
0.92
1.32
4.92
8.11
20.93
3.13
![Page 37: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
IwLLy =Area Conservation
Flux Conservation
IR LLL +=
Length of Ribbon
Scaling of Current Ribbon
w
y
LR LI
L
t = 0
t > 0
• Release of magnetic energy implies ribbon formation• Waelbroeck’s equilibrium theory more important than was recognized earlier
€
LR = L 1− U f /U i( )
€
Biy = B f w
![Page 38: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Whistler Driven Reconnection
• At spatial scales below c/pi whistler waves rather than Alfven waves drive reconnection. How?
•Side view
•Whistler signature is out-of-plane magnetic field
![Page 39: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Transverse electric field
• Transverse electric field takes the form of a wake– Remains in phase with the hole– A nonlinear, current-driven lower hybrid wave
• Controls transverse structure• k|| << k
• more nonlocal than E|| in the direction of B
x
z
Ex
![Page 40: Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081511/56813b6d550346895da4743e/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Scaling of electron holes
• Scale size
• Velocity
• The electron drift speed Vd is unknown – Bursts of holes from polar last only around 0.1s
– Insufficient time to measure the electron distribution functions
• Eliminate Vd
€
Lh = 2πVd / ωpe
€
Vh = (me / mi)1/ 3Vd
€
⇒ Lh = 2πVh
ω pe
mi
me
⎛ ⎝ ⎜
⎞ ⎠ ⎟
1/ 3