College Success Program Fall 2009 Annual Report. Fall 2009 Cohort For comparative analysis, the...

College Success Program

Fall 2009 Annual Report

Fall 2009 Cohort• For comparative analysis, the cohort of Clermont students

whose first enrolled term at the university equals 09A was selected.

• The CSP Participants, Non-participants and College Ready are defined as follows:

– CSP Participants are students who placed into 2 or 3 developmental courses and participated in the CSP program

• CSP Participants have been divided into 2 subgroups: – CSPA are students who had ongoing visits during 09A and additional support during 10W

& 10S in some cases.– CSPB are students who registered for CSP and had one meeting during 09A.

– Non-participants are students who placed into 2 or 3 developmental courses and did not participate in the CSP program

– College Ready are students who have placement test scores on file in one or more areas, placed into fewer than 2 developmental courses and did not participate in the CSP program

• The 09A Total in the demographic section reflects the composition of all Clermont students enrolled in 09A.

Fall 2009 DemographicsCSP

Participants(N=42)

Non-Participants

(N=90)

College Ready(N=588)

08A Total(N=3,990)

# % # % # % # %

Freshmen 42 100% 90 100% 588 100% 2,378 60%

Male 15 36% 35 39% 262 45% 1,680 42%

Female 27 64% 55 61% 326 55% 2,310 58%

Full-time (12+) 29 69% 59 66% 470 80% 2,521 63%

Half-time (6-11) 10 24% 24 27% 90 15% 1,111 28%

Part-time (1-5) 3 7% 7 8% 28 5% 358 9%

Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding

Fall 2009 Average Term GPA

N=42n=40

N=26n=24

N=588n=570

* One-way Anova with Dunnet T3 post hoc analysis determined mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level between 09A NP and the 09A CSPA & 09A CR cohorts

N=16n=16

N=90n=83

Fall 2009 and Fall 2008 Average GPAs

Fall 2009 Course CompletionHours

CarriedHours Earned

% Carried Hours Earned

CSP Participants 433 339 78%

CSPA 183 165 90%

CSPB 250 174 70%

Non-participants 933 631 68%

College Ready 7036 5643 80%

Fall 2009 and Fall 2008Course Completion

• The percentage of carried hours earned by 09A CSP Participants exceeds 09A Non-participants and is comparable to 09A College Ready.

• The 09A CSPA percentage of carried hours earned exceeds the 09A College Ready by 10%.

Hours Carried

Hours Earned


09A CSP Participants 433 339 78%

09A CSPA 183 165 90%

09A CSPB 250 174 70%

09A Non-participants 933 631 68%

09A College Ready 7036 5643 80%




Second Quarter Persistence

CohortFall

Entering Headcount

Enrolled Winter Not Enrolled Winter

# %Avg Fall GPA

# %Avg Fall GPA

09A CSP Participants 42 35 83% 2.246 7 17% 1.219

09A CSPA 16 13 81% 2.609 3 19% 2.305

09A CSPB 26 22 85% 2.021 4 15% 0.133

09A Non-participants 90 68 76% 1.970 22 24% 0.666

09A College Ready 588 503 86% 2.405 85 14% 1.019


08A Non-Participants 44 29 66% 1.972 15 34% 0.761

08A College Ready 759 651 86% 2.729 108 14% 1.374

Fall to Winter

Note: Average fall gpa based on students who have a gpa on record for fall quarter.

Second Quarter Average GPAs

* One-way Anova with Dunnet T3 post hoc analysis determined mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level between the 09A NP and 09A CR cohorts.

Note: Reflects second quarter persistence of students who were enrolled fall and winter quarters and have a gpa on record for both quarters.

Winter 2010 Course CompletionHours

CarriedHours Earned



CSPA 140 121 86%

CSPB 207 114 55%



Winter 2010 and Winter 2009Course Completion

• The winter quarter percentage of carried hours earned by 09A CSPA Participants exceeds 09A College Ready.

Hours Carried

Hours Earned



09A CSPA 140 121 86%

09A CSPB 207 114 55%






Third Quarter Persistence

Cohort

Entering Cohort

Enrolled Spring Not Enrolled Spring

Fall Winter #% of Wtr ret’d

Avg Winter GPA

#% of Wtr ret’d

Avg Winter GPA

09A CSP Participants 42 35 32 91% 1.818 3 9% .2333

09A CSPA 16 13 12 92% 2.297 1 8% 0.700

09A CSPB 26 22 20 91% 1.523 2 9% 0.000

09A Non-Participants 90 68 56 82% 1.987 12 18% 0.587

09A College Ready 588 503 406 81% 2.520 95 19% 0.516

08A CSP Participants 78 62 55 89% 2.309 6 11% 1.128

08A Non-participants 44 29 19 62% 2.354 8 34% 0.731

08A College Ready 759 651 566 86% 2.720 72 13% 1.621

Winter to Spring

Note: Reflects third quarter persistence of students who were enrolled both fall and winter quarters. Students who were enrolled fall, stopped out winter, then enrolled spring quarter are not included. Average winter gpa based on students who have a gpa on record for winter quarter.

Third Quarter Average GPAs

Reflects students who were enrolled fall, winter and spring quarters and have a gpa on record for all three quarters.

* One-way Anova with Dunnet T3 post hoc analysis determined mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level between 09A CSPB and 09A CR & between 09A NP and 09A CR cohorts.

Spring 2010 Course Completion

Reflects students who were enrolled fall, winter and spring quarters and have hours carried/earned on record for spring quarter

Hours Carried

Hours Earned



CSPA 119 104 87%

CSPB 175 88 50%



Spring 2010 and Spring 2009Course Completion

Reflects students who were enrolled fall, winter and spring quarters and have hours carried/earned on record for spring quarter

Hours Carried

Hours Earned



09A CSPA 119 104 87%

09A CSPB 175 88 50%






First Year Retention

Cohort

Entering Cohort

Enrolled Following Fall Quarter

Not Enrolled Following Fall Quarter

Fall # %Avg Fall College

GPA# %

AvgSpring

Term GPA

09A CSP Participants 42 19 45% 2.521 23 55% .691

CSPA 16 11 69% 2.525 5 31% .945

CSPB 26 8 31% 2.515 18 69% .648

09A Non-Participants 90 43 48% 2.226 47 52% .630

09A College Ready 588 345 59% 2.625 243 41% 1.402


08A Non-Participants 44 21 48% 2.588 23 52% 0.458

08A College Ready 759 465 61% 2.705 294 39% 1.924

Fall to Fall

Reflects all students in cohort who entered in the fall quarter and were enrolled in the fall quarter of the following year. Average fall gpa based on those students who have a gpa on record for fall quarter

* One-way Anova with Dunnet T3 post hoc analysis determined mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level between 09A NP and 09A CR cohorts.

College Success Program Fall 2009 Annual Report. Fall 2009 Cohort For comparative analysis, the...

Documents

Transcript of College Success Program Fall 2009 Annual Report. Fall 2009 Cohort For comparative analysis, the...