Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

25
Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration Roxanne Missingham, University Librarian

Transcript of Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

Page 1: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

Roxanne Missingham, University Librarian

Page 2: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

2

Genesis

"Universities are here to make the world a better place: as their direct purpose, not a by product” Prof Stephen Parker

Vital role of collections

Page 3: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

3Kautto-Koivula and Huhtaniemi

Page 4: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

4

Perceptions of the roles of the academic library

• Ithaka S+R

• Tenopir

Page 5: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

5

Ithaka study. Key findings (1)• The largest shares of respondents cite the library’s role as a purchaser of

resources as very important. Larger shares of humanists than academics from other disciplines identify each of the library’s functions as very important, especially it’s service-oriented roles.

• Though less than one-fifth of academics surveyed indicate that they think that their students have strong research skills, there exists little consensus regarding whose primary responsibility it should be to develop these skills.

• When searching for academic literature, academics favour their library’s website, scholarly databases or publicly available search engines over the library building.

Page 6: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

6

Key findings (2)• Respondents report that they value established scholarly dissemination

methods, prioritize publishing for audiences in their sub-discipline and discipline, and select journals in which to publish based on characteristics such as topical coverage, readership, and impact factor.

• Academics from the social sciences, medical sciences and natural and physical sciences have begun to embrace digital research methods while humanists feel that new practices might not be relevant or valuable to the types of research that they conduct.

• Regarding data curation, academics tend to work with research datasets or collections of media on their own computers, and think they could best be supported through access to commercial software or institutional repositories.

Page 7: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

7

Research practices

Page 8: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

8

Page 9: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

9

Page 10: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

10

Page 11: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

11

Tenopir studies (ANU)

• Increasingly library focused –– One third of respondents (32.7%, 18 of 55) do not

have a personal subscription– Average number of personal subscriptions is 2

(M=2.45, SD=2.91)– Print is the predominant form for personal

subscriptions.• Academic staff who published 5-10 items

in the last two years read the most books and other publications

Page 12: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

12

Libraries – roles within the academy

Page 13: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

13

Page 14: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

14

Page 15: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

15

Page 16: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

16

• Most article and book readings are for research and writing; other publications are read more for current awareness and research.

• ANU academic staff members on average spend 133 hours per year with library-provided material, equivalent to 16.6 eight-hour days annually

Page 17: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

17

• Australian National University postgraduate students, on average, spend 254 hours per year of their work time with library-provided material, or the equivalent of 31.75 eight-hour days annually

Page 18: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

18

Ithaka studies of Group of 8 libraries

• Survey in 2014/5• Go8

– Melbourne – New South Wales – Queensland – Sydney – Western Australia

Page 19: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

19http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3478739

Page 20: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

20

Digital natives

http://larrycuban.wordpress.com/2014/05/24/cartoons-on-digital-natives-and-immigrants/

Page 21: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

21

Reviewing collections

• Review value• Factors include:

– Relevance to research and teaching– Cost and use – Cost per use– Competitor products– Degree of uniqueness– Workflow costs – cataloguing, processing

Page 22: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

22

Page 23: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

23

• Text books vs scholarly monographs

• Open access – Knowledge unlatched and the demand for

new models– Open access text books have been found to

produce better student retention, higher marks and greater literacy

Page 24: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

24

http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1108

Page 25: Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaboration

25

• Comments/questions