Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Update · 2011. 4. 4. · Dynamic Flight list Constraint...
Transcript of Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Update · 2011. 4. 4. · Dynamic Flight list Constraint...
11
Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Update
Mark Libby - CDM Manager
Curt Kaler - CDM Co-Lead Future Concepts
Mark Hopkins – CDM Co-Lead Future Concepts
Marshall Mowery - CDM Co-Lead Surface
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
2
FAA CDM Office
CDM Domestic combined with International Operations, includes International Data Sharing
One Manager
Two Full Time Team Leads, Two Part-Time
Two Staff Specialists
One Executive Assistant
NATCA CDM Representative
3
Global Collaboration
ATCSCC/EuroControl; Action Plan 26
Collaborating with ICAO on a global ATFM manual; Chapter on CDM
Working with various air navigation service providers (ANSP) to foster the concept of CDM
International Telcons; Planning, Hurricane, Volcanic Ash, CDM Roadshows
4
CDM Working Group Structure
Flow Evaluation Team (FET) FAA/NBAA
Future Concept Team (FCT) FAA/DAL
Weather Evaluation Team (WET) FAA/JBU
Surface CDM Team (SCT) FAA/FDX
CDM Training Team (CTT) FAA/AWE
5
Flow Evaluation Team
Develop new Collaborative National Planning concepts (Automated)
Future Applications of Required Time of Arrival/Control Time of Arrival
6
Weather Evaluation Team
Developing and coordinating new weather forecasting products and procedures for Traffic Management
7
Future Concept Team
Developing Phase I of Collaborative Airspace Constraint Resolution (CACR)
8
ICR - Integrated Collaborative Rerouting
LNK
IRW
ABI
ORIGINAL
EARLY INTENT
REQUIRED Future Concept Team
9
Select Best Route around FCASelect Best Route around FCA
10
EWR1
EWR2
EWR3
EWR4
EWR5
EWR6
EWR7
EWR8
EWR9
EWR ROUTES
NRS (National Route System) Wind Routes
11
JFK1/TEB1
JFK2/TEB2
JFK4/TEB4
JFK3/TEB3
JFK5/TEB5
JFK6/TEB6
JFK7/TEB7
JFK/TEB ROUTES
NRS (National Route System) Wind Routes
12
SEVEN7System Enhancements for Versatile Electronic Negotiation
ConceptConceptConceptConcept
User generates list of prioritized multiple
options
TFM-S manages data exchange TM monitors capacity and
manages demand
Prioritized Option List
Dynamic Flight list
Constraint Definition
Automated messages
User generates list of prioritized multiple
options
TFM-S manages data exchange TM monitors capacity and
manages demand
Prioritized Option List
Dynamic Flight list
Constraint Definition
Automated messages
CTOPCTOPCollaborative Trajectory Options ProgramCollaborative Trajectory Options Program
TBO - Trajectory Based Operations
13
SEVEN7System Enhancements for Versatile Electronic Negotiation
ConceptConceptConceptConcept
Interactive Dynamic Flight List (IDFL)Flow Constrained Area (FCA)
CTOPCTOPCollaborative Trajectory Options ProgramCollaborative Trajectory Options Program
14
TOS - Trajectory Options Set
TOS for UAL234
RMNT: Route M inimum N otification T ime required by the user to accept the given trajectory
Initial Filed trajectory
ZKC_wx20-40 mins delay,
0-9 mins delay
10-19 mins delay,
20-40 mins delay
10-19 mins delay
RMNT = 60 mins
0-9 mins delay
RMNT =
RMNT = 60 mins
RMNT = 15 mins
RMNT = 15 mins
60 mins
0-9 mins delay
RMNT : Route M inimum N otification T ime required by the user to accept the given trajectory
Initial trajectory
ZKC_wx20-40 mins delay,
0-9 mins delay
10-19 mins delay,
20-40 mins delay
10-19 mins delay
RMNT = 60 mins
0-9 mins delay
RMNT =
RMNT = 60 mins
RMNT = 15 mins
RMNT = 15 mins
60 mins
0-9 mins delay
15
ScheduledFiledActiveDelayedRe-routed
CTOP – Collaborative Trajectory Options Program
More flights get rerouted and delayed(shown in white & yellow)
16
CTOP – Collaborative Trajectory Options Program
Demand through the ZKC FCAafter capacity dial up to 80%
ScheduledFiledActiveDelayedRe-routed
EXIT STRATEGY
Flights begin returning to their #1 option or original route
(white & yellow routes reducing and more green rout es appear)
17
1. “Right Sizing”the Constraint
- Decision support: Where to draw the line?Where to set the dial?
CACR – Collaborative Airspace Constraint
Resolution
18
Framework for Weather Impacts in Decision Support
CIWS / CoSPAPrecipitation & Echo Tops
ForecastsPilot Model:
Probability of Deviation
Impact Forecasts
FCA Capacity Forecast Matrix
Forecast Weather Avoidance Field (WAF)
TranslationWeather
Airspace
Route / flow blockage
Capacity impacts
Decision Support
RAPT
Operational Needs
Performance Metrics
Decision support : Where to set the dial?
19
TerminalTerminal En Route
Tactical Reroutes Less Than 45 MIN From Departure
Tactical Airborne Reroutes
2. Tactical Departure Constraint Resolution & Tactical Enroute Constraint Resolution
20
Surface CDM Team
Developing
Requirements Document for sharing airport surface data
Collaborating with EuroControl Airport-CDM Team to harmonize (where possible) Surface CDM Procedures
21
Summary of Major CONOPS Changes
• Alignment with NextGen Implementation Plan (NGIP) & FAA Response to RTCA Task Force Recommendations
• Alignment with industry CONOPS-writing standards
• Development of Departure Reservoir Management (DRM) and Departure Metering Procedures (DMP) concepts
• Time-Based DMP (assignment of TMAT)
• Count-Based DMP (assignment of TMAC)
Surface CDM Team (SCT) Update
Marshall Mowery, FAA Surface CDM
Mark Hopkins, Delta Airlines
22
Foundational Surface CDM Capabilities & Procedures
1. Improve Individual and Shared Situational Awareness to Manage Departures.
2. Tactically Manage Surface Movement and Departure Queues
3. Improve Situational Awareness to Manage Arrival Traffic Flows
4. Improve Analysis and Measurement of Surface Operations
5. Global Harmonization
23
Goals of Surface CDM
Establish a foundation for interoperability/global harmonization with other relevant Airport CDM programs
Identify policy considerations for each of the core capabilities
Align with the FAA’s NextGen “Solution Sets”
Flexible, transparent, quantifiable
Understand the “real” demand at an airport
Improve situational awareness
Disseminate timely and accurate airport surface operations information among Stakeholders in a standardized format
24
Goals of Surface CDM…
Archive and store data for post-operational retrieval and analysis by all Stakeholders
Identify measures and metrics which allow Stakeholders to measure the efficiency of the airport surface operation
Improve predictability by continuously monitoring capacity and demand
Improve NAS efficiency
Effectively improve timeliness of flight operations
Reduce the environmental impact of airport surface operations
25
Airport CDM Influence in CONOPS
Key Similarities
• Use of information sharing guidelines & similar milestones approaches. Shared milestones include, but not limited to:
Target off Block Time (TOBT)
Actual off Block Time (AOBT)
Actual Take off Time (ATOT)
Estimated Landing Time (ELDT)
Target Landing Time (TLDT)
Actual Landing Time (ALDT)
• Establishment of Key Performance Areas and Indicators
• Collaborative pre-departure sequencing and management of flight updates
• Incorporation of variable taxi times into prediction/planning
26
Airport CDM Influence in CONOPS…
Key Differences
• Surface CDM CONOPS establishes the metering point at the transition between the non-movement and movement areas (spots), whereas Airport CDM establishes the control point at the gate/stand.
• Surface CDM does not adopt Airport CDM’s Target Startup Approval Time (TSAT) turn-around milestone. Operators will determine startup time internally as necessary to adhere to established spot arrival times.
• Surface CDM equitably assigns departure opportunities to aircraft operators in the form of specific Target Movement area Entry Times (TMATs) or Target Movement area Entry Counts (TMACs), depending on which capacity allocation method best suits the needs of a particular operation.
• Within Surface CDM, the entity responsible for acting as the Departure Reservoir Coordinator (DRC) will be selected on an airport-by-airport basis, and may not necessarily be ATC/TFM.
• Surface CDM recognizes the FAA definition of taxi time as time in movement area, but also considers “out-to-off” performance. Airport-CDM defines taxi time as “out-to-off”.
27
-Culture Change
-Runway and Taxiway Closures
-New and Challenging Configurations
-Airspace Constraints, Conflict with LGA
- 7 Terminals, Cargo and General Aviation Terminals
-145 Carriers, International and Domestic
-Existing Tools, funding, bureaucratic process
28
29
� Support customers with effective surface
management in response to construction� Maintain similar throughput
� Mitigate increase in delays
� Increase Safety
� Provide a better passenger experience
30
� Promote Culture Change –Exit First Come First Served
� Ration by Schedule through Equitable Allocation of Bucket Times
� Communicate and leverage strategic support from FAA
� Maximize surface efficiency by allocating bucket times based on true departure capacity for the configuration, first fix availability
� Enable more seamless configuration changes by reducing AOA congestion
31
32
JFK Performance with MeteringSource: ASPM
2010 taxi out times were approximately 4 minutes less than in 2009
33
Gate Departure DelaySource: ASPM
More gate delay in 2010 compared to 2009
34
Questions?