Collaborative Data Teams Growing to Learn & Learning to Grow
description
Transcript of Collaborative Data Teams Growing to Learn & Learning to Grow
Collaborative Data TeamsGrowing to Learn & Learning to Grow
Eugene Field Elementary Kindergarten-4th grade
Maryville, Missouri
First, the test!
Next, the results!
Now, what?
Collaborative Data TeamsEFE Background
• 500 students Kindergarten-4th
• 60 Preschoolers• Typically 5 sections per
grade level• Professional Learning
Community (Year 7)– Teams collaborate weekly
Collaborative Data TeamsGrowing to Learn & Learning to Grow
• Varying instruction and materials used from one classroom to the next
• Students not retaining information
• Inconsistency in student grades and assessments
• Teachers working extremely hard, but still showing little growth on MAP assessments
Collaborative Data TeamsEssential Outcomes
How many years has your school worked with essential outcomes or power standards?• A) What’s that?• B) We started this year• C) 2-3 years• D) More than 3 years
Collaborative Data TeamsTraining
• PLC Team (small group)
• Whole group• Facilitators through
(NWRPDC)• Collaborative grant
Collaborative Data TeamsCommon Assessments
• Philosophy• Development• Alignment• Implementation• Continuous reflection
Collaborative Data TeamsData Meetings
• Twice per quarter• Data deadline• NWRPDC Facilitator• Discussion on strategies• Transparency of data• Our kids; not my kids, your kids
Collaborative Data TeamsData Team Process
Collaborative Data TeamsMeeting Protocol
Collaborative Data TeamsBenefits
• Data is systematically used to guide our instruction– No longer assessing just to assess– Monitor student mastery and retention– Consistency in curriculum (strategies & materials)
• Teachers more accountable: – Pacing guide– Data notebooks
• Students more accountable:– Set goals– Data notebooks
Collaborative Data TeamsGrowing to Learn & Learning to Grow
Eugene Field ElementaryK-4
Collaborative Data TeamsData Collection: Common Assessments
Collaborative Data TeamsData Collection: Checkpoints
Collaborative Data TeamsProgress Reporting
Collaborative Data TeamsData Analysis
Collaborative Data Teams
How would your staff respond to entering assessment data in this way?• A) We have a similar system in place• B) They would embrace it• C) They would grumble, but dang that line
“other duties as assigned”• D) Fight it, ignore it, or throw their computers
out the window
Collaborative Data Teams
How would your staff respond to this level of transparency of data: teacher names on the wall identifying their class scores?• A) We already have a similar system• B) They would embrace it and see it as a chance
to grow as an instructor• C) They would grumble, but live with it• D) Attend meetings with a bag over their heads
Collaborative Data TeamsBefore & After
Before Data Teams After Data TeamsProgress was reported based on unit tests immediately following a unit of study. Content may or may not have been revisited
Progress is reported on skills throughout the year encouraging spiraling of content.
Reams of paper consumed on worksheets at the end of quarter for extra assessment data.
A single packet and a handful of addition sheets of paper per student to monitor progress.
1-2 week assessment period 1-2 day assessment periodMAP Prep – Cram & Jam No need to quickly review skills
since it has been done all year.
Collaborative Data TeamsQuestions & FeedbackHow could you use this
information in your teaching?
If you would like any additional info please email [email protected]