Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

download Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

of 117

Transcript of Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    1/117

    NTIT NK W RF R

    S MIN R

    14 15

    October

    1976

    ashington D.C.

    T R A N S C R IP T

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    2/117

    P RT

    NGLISH T XT

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    3/117

    P RT TR NSL TORS

    M r P M Sp rey

    i Tash

    Capt

    L 0

    Rat ley I I I

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    4/117

    NOTES

    TO

    THE READER

    This;docxament

    is

    d iv ided

    i n t o two p a r t s . The first

    is a t r a n s c r i p t o f th e q ue st io ns

    asked Col . Rudel and

    th e

    a n sw e r s

    a ^

    translated

    f r om the

    German a n s w e r s . Th e

    s e c

    ond

    pa r t o f

    th e

    work i s

    a

    t r an s c r i p t only

    o f th e

    mate r ia l

    t h a t was a sked

    and answered

    i n th e

    German o r i g i n a l .

    The re

    a re s l i gh t

    d i f f e r ence s

    in

    P RT

    the t r an s l a t i on s as

    ren

    de r ed at t h e

    c o n f e r e n c e and

    PART II wh ich was t r a n s l a t e d

    l a t e r

    from a r e co rd i ng o f

    th e

    en t i r e con f e r en ce . If

    th e

    r eade r

    has

    a

    pa r t i c u l a r

    i n t e r e s t

    in

    any

    a rea covered in

    P RT I , he she shou ld

    a l so

    r e f e r to

    th e

    t r a n s l a t e d

    Ger

    man o r i g i n a l

    in P RT

    II The s l i g h t d i f f e r ence s a re due

    t o th e l o s s o f a

    c e r t a i n

    po r t i o n

    a t

    th e German o r i g i n a l

    du ri ng s imu lt an eou s t r an s l a t i on s as opposed to

    no t

    hav

    ing

    any

    t ime l im i t when working with re co rd ed mater ia l .

    Due to th e poo r q ua li ty o f th e

    t ape

    r ecorde r used ,

    some

    o f th e ma te r i a l

    is

    un i n t e l l i g i b l e

    and is

    so

    in d ic ate d in

    the text

    11

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    5/117

    V

    BSTR CT

    This document

    is a transcript of a conference held

    in Washington D.C.

    on

    14 15

    October 1976 with various

    representatives of

    the

    U.S. Armed

    Services

    and

    Industry

    and Colonel

    Hans Ulrich

    Rudel. Col. Rudel was the most

    highly

    decorated member

    of

    the

    German Armed

    Services

    in

    World

    War Two.

    Col. Rudel

    was

    a

    JU 87

    Stuka Lagtwai^e

    pilot

    and

    his most notable achievement was the destruct

    ion of

    519

    Soviet tanks with his JU 87 G Stuka

    which

    was fitted

    with

    two 37 mm

    antitank cannons

    The

    U.S.

    interest

    in Col

    Rudel

    was

    stimulated in

    the

    past

    by

    the situation confronting TO today of a

    massive Warsaw Pact advantage in armored vehicles

    especially tanks The information obtained

    from Col.

    Rudel at this conference

    and

    recent studies on air to

    ground

    antitank warfare tend to support the thesis

    that a

    tremendous

    resevoir of information is available

    from Laitiuaiie. antitank experience that is directly

    applicable

    to

    the NATO/Warsaw Pact

    situation in

    Europe

    t od y

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    6/117

    TAPE I

    SIDE

    I

    INTRODUCTION

    CHAIRMAN:

    I would like

    to

    introduce Capt Lon Ratley who

    will give

    a

    brief

    rundown of

    the

    war on

    the

    Eastern

    Front as fought through the

    German

    eyes Capt

    Lon

    Ratley

    is

    assigned

    to FIT

    unintelligible , but he is going to

    Postgraduate

    School in

    Monterey,

    California

    with the

    Navy His

    thesis

    subject was Close Air Support and he

    is

    trying to draw analogies i think quite successfully

    between

    the

    war

    of the

    MOs

    and

    the possible

    war

    in

    the

    near future;

    or in

    the next 10 to 15 years. In

    his

    research he did go to Germany he speaks fluent Geannan

    and he

    did

    examine the

    Archives

    and spoke to German

    Generals.

    He was

    fortunate

    enough to be

    able

    to find

    Col Rudel and spend a delightful time interviewing him

    for

    his

    research paper.

    i t

    was the outgrowth of

    that

    effort

    that has

    led to

    where

    we are today.

    What d

    l ike to

    do

    is

    have Capt. Ratley give a

    brief overview of the war on the Eastern Front give you

    background on Col Rudel himself, and then

    we

    will go

    into a seminar session. In order to make

    i t reasonable,

    we will try to res t r ic t

    the

    participants

    to those

    people tha t

    are

    s i t t ing a t the table .

    Then,

    we wil l

    go into the

    question

    and answer

    period.

    will

    le t

    the

    topics flow

    as they may.

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    7/117

    T A P E I

    S I D E

    I

    C o l .

    R u d e l , I a s s u r e

    you w i l l be

    t r u e

    t o h i s word.

    H e l l

    be c a n d i d

    and

    f r a n k w i t h

    h i s answers and

    when they

    h u r t

    a n d

    a r e

    n o t

    q u i t e

    wha t

    we

    w a n t

    t o

    h e a r ,

    w e l l

    be

    f o r t u

    n a t e enough

    t o h e a r

    th em anyway. Tha t

    i s

    t h e purpose

    o f

    t h i s m e e t i n g .

    L e t me f o r my own e d i f i c a t i o n and f o r everybody

    e l s e h e r e , g o a r o u n d t h e t a b l e a n d show C o l . R u d e l

    w h o s

    h e r e .

    I

    am

    C o l . Bob

    D i l g e r ;

    I am t h e

    D i r e c t o r o f A-10

    Armament. To

    my l e f t i s Gen. B r i l l . e i s t h e System

    Program D i r e c t o r f o r t h e A-10 program . Next t o him

    i s

    Mr.

    Wilson from

    t h e O f f i c e o f

    S t r a t e g i c

    Research

    CIA.

    Close Air

    Support

    i s one o f t h e

    prime

    s u b j e c t s

    they

    are

    l o o k i n g

    at t h i s t i m e . Next t o

    him is F r e d

    F e e r who

    h a s

    w o r k e d w i t h

    Peter in s o m e

    related

    a r e a s of c o n v e n t i o n a l

    warfare M r . M ik e M e c c a is next He is

    a

    retired A i r

    F o r c e

    O f f i c e r , 105

    d r i v e r

    and now

    v e r y

    much i n v o l v e d i n

    t h e A-10 program from a v i e w p o i n t o f

    employment among

    o t h e r

    t h i n g s .

    N e x t ,

    Mr. F r e d F r e d e r i c k s o n . Mr. F r e d e r i c k -

    son i s

    formerly from I and Warfare o f

    DDR E

    e i s now

    i n an

    a n a l y s i s program

    System P l a n n i n g Program. Next

    t o

    him is

    Mr. Spirey- Mr

    S p r a y

    was f o r m e r l y i n t h e group

    t h a t

    i s

    now

    c a l l e d

    ASI^A

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    8/117

    TAPE I SIDE I

    He

    is

    the

    head

    of

    ASD/PA E Tac Ai^. Next

    to

    him

    IS Bernie Bock, Deputy

    Director

    of

    the

    DDR E

    General Purpose

    Forces . Then, Gen. Smith, DCS Air Headquarters

    Marine Corps.

    Tom Turner is next. Vice President of Fair

    child Industries. He also

    vforks

    for

    Gen.

    Brill.

    Gen. McMullen, who is next was formerly Director of

    the A-10 program and is now director of all requirements

    for

    TAC.

    This is a new job for

    him

    and

    we

    in the A-10

    are delighted that he is here. Next to

    him

    is Maj. Tash

    who

    will

    help with

    the

    interpretation.

    He

    speaks

    fluent

    German.

    i would like to find a seat for Mr.

    Meyers

    up

    here at the table. Mr. chuck

    Meyers

    is from ddR B

    A.ir

    Warfare .

    This

    is

    an unusual position to have at a

    meeting like this but

    he

    recently took

    over

    responsi

    i l i ty fo r th

    A 10

    So,

    with

    this I

    would

    like to turn the

    meeting

    over to Capt. Lon Ratley. He will give us a brief over

    view

    of the

    War on

    the Eastern Front and a

    background

    on

    Col. Rudel for those of you that have not read his

    book. Then

    we

    will go into seminar session.

    CAPTAIN LON RATLEY:

    Good morning gentlemen. i am Capt. Ratley. Col.

    Dilger already explained

    what

    we

    are

    going to go

    through

    basically; a recap of the

    campaign

    on the Eastern Front

    and

    a

    few

    words about the German anti tank aircraft

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    9/117

    T A P E I

    S I D E

    I

    The code name for the German plan for the camptiign

    against Russia was BARBAROSSA

    Basical ly,

    the plan

    consisted

    of

    twelve

    weeks;

    three

    weeks

    for the

    capture

    o f

    Smolensk,

    three weeks

    for resupply and r e s t

    and

    then

    s ix weeks

    t h e r e a f t e r would

    be the

    capture

    of Moscow

    There were 333 German tanks used i n t h i s campaign,

    o p po si ng a p p ro x im a t e ly

    22-24

    th ou sa nd R u ss ia n t a n k s .

    About 3 . 2

    m i l l i o n German s o l d i e r s

    and a b o u t 4 . 5

    m i l l i o n

    R u s s i a n t r o o p s l o c a te d i n Western USSR.

    QUESTION:

    By G e n e r a l

    Brill

    Were these

    a l l

    TlQtK67

    Referring to

    the German

    t a n k s . )

    A N S W E R :

    No

    s i r , there were

    no a t t h a t time. They

    were Panze^i I I I 6 and I l / 4 . L a t e r

    i n

    t h e war t h e Germans

    used the PanthzA which was i n the 4 ton

    class and

    the

    TIqzh. i n t h e 60 t o n c l a s s )

    CAPTAIN

    LON

    RATLEY;

    The

    German execution of the campaign went

    according

    t o

    p l a n ,

    u n t i l

    t h e c a p t u r e o f

    Smolensk

    which f e l l on 16

    J u l y ,

    1941, t h a t

    i s

    where

    t h e i r d i f f i c u l t y s t a r t e d .

    There

    was

    some

    ques t ion

    about

    the

    s t r a t e g i c

    o b j e c t i v e s

    o f

    t h e

    campaign . H i t l e r

    d e c i d e d

    t h a t ,

    i n l i e u o f

    dlmmediately g o i n g

    f o r

    t h e

    rail

    and communicat ion

    c e n t e r

    i n Moscow, he would a t t a c k

    i n s t e a d

    t o t h e South and

    ^

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    10/117

    TAPE

    I S I D E I

    capture

    large numbers

    of diso rgan ized Soviet troops

    in the Ukraine. This was quite a

    successful

    operation.

    However when

    they

    shifted

    the

    weight

    of

    the

    campaign

    back t o

    t h e

    North t o Moscow, t h e r e was i n s u f f i c i e n t

    s t r e n g t h left t o

    p e r m i t

    t h e Germans t o

    e f f e c t t h e

    c a p t u r e

    Moscow

    p r i o r

    t o

    t h e o n s e t o f w i n t e r w e a t h e r

    Through December

    41,

    these

    figures you see here

    are rough, but approximately

    3

    million Russian

    POW s

    17,500

    Russian

    tanks

    destroyed, 2000 Russian a i r c r a f t

    were destroyed t h e f i r s t day. I might add t h a t t h a t

    figure i s

    somewhat

    suspect. The reported

    1800

    a i r c r a f t were destroyed.

    Back

    in headquarters

    M a r s h a l l Goer ing a t t h e t ime

    d i d n t

    b e l i e v e them and

    he

    s e n t h i s own

    s p e c i a l

    p e o p l e o u t

    t o

    t h e f i e l d t o i n v e s t i

    g a t e

    Subsequent ly he d i s c o v e r e d

    it

    w a s n t 1800,

    i t

    was

    in

    fact

    over

    2000.

    Basically

    the winter

    campaign

    deter iorated to s t a t i c warfare. German

    losses during

    the

    winter

    were primari ly due to

    t h e i r unpreparedness

    fo r

    winter;

    as opposed to any offensive

    act ion

    by th e Sov ie ts .

    There

    were

    excess ive command changes

    on

    the

    German

    side

    because of

    the f a i l u r e to

    take

    Moscow. Primari ly

    udzfilo Vi

    and Hotk

    who

    were

    the

    two pri me

    architects

    of

    the

    BlitzkJLlQ g

    and armored

    t a c t i c s

    All t h r e e army group

    commanders,

    iVon l/on Bock, and l/ow Run6te.dt were

    a ls o r e lie ve d

    The summer o f f e n s i v e of

    19 42 had

    two primary o b j e c t i v e s ;

    Stalingrad and the

    o i l

    f i e l d s a t

    Baku on the

    Caspian Sea.

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    11/117

    T PE I

    S IDE

    I

    The e x e c u t i o n

    m isc a rrie d with

    th e

    fa i lure

    to

    hold

    Stalingrad. Ninety percent of the city was captured by

    the

    Germans

    but ten p ercent

    was

    not.

    Subsequently

    the Russians

    moved in

    and

    were

    successful

    in

    surrounding

    Stalingrad

    and caputring

    the Sixth

    Army. At

    the

    same

    time

    a

    s p e c i a l rmy

    Group

    i t is d iff ic ult

    to

    see

    from

    this map but

    Stalingrad is

    here on

    the

    Volga rmy

    Group A p e n e tr a te d down

    here

    by the C acus us M ou nt ai ns

    a nd a dv an ce d patrols-even reached the C as pi an S ea . You

    don t

    see

    this much

    in History books but they did in

    fac t

    reach th e C as pian S ea .

    I t i s

    down in th is a r e a .

    As

    yo u

    can s e e this extended

    r ight

    wing o f th e German

    Army p u t them in an extremely precarious p o s i t i o n

    because

    t h e y

    were n o t

    a b l e

    to

    h o l d

    S t a l i n g r a d .

    At

    this p o in t entered

    Marshall

    Von

    Manstein.

    He

    wa s

    s u c c e s s f u l

    in

    a

    se r i es

    o f

    d e f e n s i v e

    ba t t l e s

    on

    i t s

    l e f t

    wing

    an d t h er ef o r e enabled

    the

    Germans to withdraw

    Army Group A

    back

    to i t s

    jumping

    off

    p o s i t i o n .

    In

    March

    of

    19 4

    3 he successful ly c o u n t e r a t t a c k e d th e

    Russians

    in

    Kharkov and

    they

    suffered a

    severe

    d e f e a t

    there and

    th e

    in i t i a t ive

    passed back

    i nt o

    German

    hands.

    This

    le d to th e

    German Summer

    offensive

    in

    1943

    a t

    th e

    battle

    of Kursk. This was a Russian salient

    that

    pro

    truded into

    the German

    l in es

    around

    the

    city

    of

    Kursk.

    I t was the Germans plan to

    pinch off

    th is sa lien t by

    concentric attacks from the North and South.

    The

    planning

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    12/117

    TAPE I SI I

    for the campaign

    was

    c ha ra cte riz ed by a lot of deception

    delays and differences of opinion. Von ansteinhad opted

    for an i mmed ia te attack at Kursk before the onset of the

    rainy

    season

    immediately

    after the battle

    of Kharkov

    in

    March. One thing led to another

    and

    the actual

    offensive did

    not start

    until

    July

    1943. The allies

    as

    you know landed in Sicily on

    the

    12th

    of

    July and

    Hitler called off the

    offensive

    a t Kursk

    in

    order to with

    draw

    the

    Second SS Panzer Corps into Italy to counter

    allied

    landings. I t

    is

    generally

    agreed

    that

    after

    the

    batt le of Kursk

    any

    possibil i t ies

    for a

    total

    German

    victory

    on

    the

    Eastern Front disappeared. That is not

    to imply that they

    lost

    the war there only that the war

    could not

    be

    t o t a l l y won.

    The

    final

    campaigns from 1943 to 45

    basically

    consisted of

    a war

    of

    attrition

    with

    the

    initiative

    swing

    ing to the Soviets

    and

    a gradual German defeat.

    There

    were no

    spe c t a cu l a r

    ba t t l e s a f t e r th e

    ba t t l e o f

    Kursk.

    Field

    commanders because

    of

    mistrust between major field

    commanders and W

    Headquarters

    were

    not given

    enough

    authori ty in the f ield to f ully exp lo it a l l of the

    si tuat ions

    that presented themselves.

    For

    example the defens ive

    l ine

    because

    they

    taught

    them not one

    step backwards

    could

    not be straightened so as to preclude

    the

    number

    of

    miles of front

    tha t

    any

    given

    division would have to defend.

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    13/117

    TAPE I S^IDE I

    There was

    a l s o

    a marked d et er io ra ti on i n

    mobile warfare

    because of

    worn-out

    equipment,

    lack of fuel and

    logistics

    s u p p o r t .

    A

    little

    b i t about

    a n t i t a n k a i r c r a f t :

    Two

    were

    primari ly used, the HS-129 and Stuka G Model

    t h a t

    Col.

    Rudel

    f lew. The HS-129

    c a r r i e d

    a 30

    cannon

    on a

    center

    l ine mount. The JU87 G

    carried

    two pod

    mounted 37 cannons mounted o u t b o a r d from t h e main

    landing gear . This i s a shot o f the HS-129. Of t h i s

    particular

    version

    here, there

    were

    only

    6

    or

    9

    buil t ,

    I m

    not sure exact ly

    which. This i s n t the

    37,

    t h i s i s the

    75

    cannon t h a t was used. This

    p a r t i c u l a r

    a i r c r a f t was

    considered ponderous and

    was

    only used

    fo r individual

    tanks

    t h a t

    had broken through th e f r o n t and were a t h r e a t

    t o th e

    major a r e a s

    t o t h e r e a r

    of

    t h e

    German

    d i v i s i o n s .

    Today

    we

    a r e

    p r i m a r i l y

    concerned

    with

    t h e

    Stuka,

    You

    can s e e a s t a n d a r d D Model h er e w i t h ou t t h e cannons .

    It

    i s

    impor tant

    t o note t h a t t h e Stuka was considered

    in

    1939

    by

    the

    Germans t o

    be an

    a i r c r a f t

    t h a t was

    not

    t o

    modern s t a n d a r d s . It was

    n o t

    c o n s i d e r e d

    a

    modern

    front l i n e

    a i r c r a f t

    by

    the

    Germans in 1939. Yet, i t

    was used up

    u n t i l

    t h e

    v e r y

    end

    o f

    t h e war .

    This i s

    a

    p i c t u r e of the G Model Staka with the individual cannons

    mounted

    here , each weighing about 1000 pounds and

    each

    carrying

    (you can see

    it

    here) a

    magazine o f.

    s i x 37

    r

    s h e l l s e a c h . Col . Rudel had 2500 c e r t i f i e d s o r t i e s .

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    14/117

    t p I SI E I

    Twenty one

    hundred

    of

    which were

    with

    the

    and 4

    Of

    which

    were

    in the

    FW-190.

    A l i t t le background on Col.

    Rduel:

    he was

    born

    in

    1916 in Silesia his father was an Evangelist Minister.

    He

    joined

    the

    Luitwaiiz

    in 1936

    going

    into pilot training

    subsequently posted to the Staka squadron

    and

    from there

    he was tranferred to a reconaissance

    squadron

    and then back

    to a Staka squadron. From there his first actual

    bomb

    dropping combat did

    not

    start until the Russian campaign

    of

    June

    1941.

    Thereafter

    he

    was

    promoted

    very

    rapidly

    ending the war as a Gzickuiad l commander which would be

    roughtly equivalent to an augmented AF Wing today.

    He

    was primarily responsible for introducing the Stuka. with

    the 37 cannons into operational use in Russia. His

    tally on tanks was 519 that he personally destroyed. The

    figure is

    somewhat

    misleading

    because the

    Germans

    required

    that the tank burn

    and

    also explode before

    i t was

    con

    sidered a kill So roughly you

    can

    multiply that by a

    factor of

    two

    or three to get a more realistic picture

    of how many tanks Col.

    Rudel

    personally destroyed.

    He

    was decorated personally by Hitler with the

    Knights

    Cross

    Golden Oak

    Leaf

    Swords

    Diamonds

    only

    one of which was awarded to Col. Rudel. He is the

    highest decorated

    German

    soldier

    in

    the 2nd World

    War.

    T ha t c on clu de s my por t ion

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    15/117

    TAPE I

    S IDE

    I

    CHAIRMAN:

    Let

    me

    jus t add

    a few comments to i t and

    then

    we

    wil l

    go

    to the

    seminar. I t

    was

    the Stuka

    which was an important part

    of the

    concept tha t

    was

    to provide

    mobile

    f i re

    power

    to

    the rap id advancing

    forces

    Even

    though

    the

    Germans

    were

    out

    numbered

    for

    exapmle in Russia

    by a large magnitude

    by lightning

    tac t ics they were able

    to

    get

    on the

    edge of

    s

    cow in

    a

    mat ter o f

    6

    weeks or thereabouts

    That

    was

    a 1200

    mile

    advance against overwhelming numerical superiority on

    the o the r

    s ide

    The

    th ing

    t h a t Lon

    d id

    no t

    mention

    was t h a t

    Colonel

    Rudel

    also

    sunk

    the larges t ship of the war by ai r

    The

    ba t t l e sh i p

    MuKat He a l so sank a

    c ru i s e r

    The 2500 so r

    t i e s as it turns ou t in the l a t t e r

    part

    of

    the war when the

    German

    Luitujaiiz was enormously

    outnumbered

    in

    the

    a i r The

    Soviets actually had a i r supremeacy for a l l pract ical

    purposes.

    The

    tank ki l l s

    that he had again did not

    occur dur ing

    the

    early part of

    the war

    a t

    a l l

    His

    tank

    ki l ls occurred pri

    marily

    a f t e r th e in tr oduc tio n of the gun

    on

    the Stuka. And

    i t was

    over the l ively

    debate

    that

    took place

    within

    the Luf

    forces as to whether

    tha t

    one could even do

    t h i s

    so

    Rudel was much

    impressed

    with the

    accuracy of

    a gun system

    and

    did the

    basic

    R

    and

    D

    f lying .

    He brought

    it out to oper

    a t iona l

    l ines

    and

    introduced it

    through a combination

    o f

    tac

    t i c s He

    came enormously success fu l in

    h is

    venture t he r e

    So most o f the

    k i l l s occurred

    in the

    l a t e r

    pa r t o f the

    war

    almost a l l with the gun

    system.

    And they occurred under a

    1

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    16/117

    TAPE I

    S I D E

    I

    situation that would be difficul t to comprehend from a view

    point

    of

    numerical

    superiority on

    the opposite side

    A

    tank

    kil l also

    had to be verified by

    another

    person The tank had

    to burn i t had to explode and another person had to

    verify

    i t .

    Then you

    had

    a

    tank

    k i l l and not before

    Two

    or three

    to me

    i s

    a conservat ive est imate

    of

    what really occurred

    Now u n f o r t u n a t e l y I was o u t r a n k e d . So I c a n n o t be a

    p a r t i c i p a n t

    i n t h e seminar A l l I can

    be

    i s the

    Chairman

    I d l ike to throw i t open to questions and we will in terpret

    to make

    sure

    Col

    Rudel understands

    the q uestio ns a s well

    and

    we wil l in terpret back

    We

    wil l go slowly

    QUESTION:

    Bob

    1 6

    l ike to ask

    the

    Colonel t h i s . Colonel in

    add

    i t ion to the tanks that

    you

    shot a t did

    you

    keep

    a

    record

    of the trucks or

    a r t i l l e r y

    pieces

    or dxther

    vehicles

    accompany

    ing

    the tanks o r did

    you

    not

    even bother

    to shoot a t them?

    ANSWER :

    Yes

    he did both a t t a c k

    and

    keep some numeration

    o f

    t h e

    things he shot a t . Unfortunately t h e s e records were

    s t o l e n

    from him

    so they are

    unavailable

    to

    anybody

    r ight now He

    c a n t account for a l l

    of

    them

    but

    d i d in f a c t

    account

    fo r

    over

    300

    vehic les and

    80

    a r t t i - a i r c r a f t p o s i t i o n s t h a t

    he

    had

    d e s t r o y e d .

    QUESTION:

    Almost

    a l l

    the k i l l s I

    guess

    were

    in the Stuka

    Now you

    s a i d 37 ram 6 rounds p e r

    magazine?

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    17/117

    TAPE

    I

    S I D E

    I

    ANSWER:

    Y e s sir

    QUESTION:

    So t h o s e were r e a l l y s i n g l e s h o t ?

    ANSWER;

    Yes

    sir

    I v e

    a lr e a d y t a lk e d w i t h him a b o u t t h i s so I

    c a n answer y o u r q u e s t i o n . U s u a l l y what he would do is

    a t t a c k

    f r o n s l a n t r a n g e o f

    a b o u t

    300 m e t e r s .

    QUESTION:

    U n i n t e l l i g i b l e )

    ANSWER:

    No he d f i r e two

    simultaneously

    e would

    at tempt

    to

    f i r e

    two

    a t

    the same t ime;

    one

    from

    each gun

    QUESTION:

    Your

    s l a n t r a n g e

    was 200

    m e t e r s ? L e t

    h im

    a n s w e r t h a t .

    A N S W E R :

    The

    g u n s w e r e

    h a r m o n i z e d

    t o

    s h o o t t 400 m e t e r s b u t C o l .

    R u d e l

    f o u n d it was difficult f o r h i m t o b e a s e x a c t a s he

    wanted t o

    be

    i n o r d e r t o e f f e c t a k i l l

    by

    shoot ing a t those

    r a n g e s . He

    would

    u s u a l l y go down t o

    200

    somet imes 100 o r 1 5 0 .

    He

    had t o b e v e r y

    e x a c t

    i n h i s

    d e l i v e r i e s a n d h e h a d t o hit

    t h e

    tank

    i n

    a

    v u l n e r a b l e

    a r e a

    where

    t h e t un g st en - ca rb i d e c e nt e r

    would p e n e t r a t e t h e f u e l o r ammunition s t o r a g e a r e a i n o r d e r

    t o e f f e c t

    a k i l l . e

    c o u l d n t do t h i s a t f u r t h e r s l a n t range

    b e c a u s e

    o f t h e

    a c c u r a c y .

    Q U E S T I O N :

    - 1 ^ -

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    18/117

    TAPE I

    3 IDE

    I

    ow given

    you had a very short open

    fire unintelligible)

    what sort

    of

    ground a ir threat was

    involved?

    Was there org

    anized arms

    act ivi ty or, because of the dynamics of

    the

    s i t

    ua t i o n ,

    was

    it nonex i s t en t ?

    ANSWER:

    When the Russian

    tanks

    would b re ak th ro ug h the

    f ron t ,

    as

    with

    any a t tack ,

    the i r

    l og i s t i c s

    t ra in

    would

    become

    somewhat

    s t r a i n ed .

    VtakpanzzA., the

    guns

    t h a t

    a re

    mounted on

    a

    tank

    chass i s would f a l l behind the t anks .

    Therefore ,

    the problem

    would

    presen t

    i t s e l f :

    Tanks t ha t

    had

    broken,

    through

    the

    f ron t

    had t u r n e d

    o u t was much

    more difficult

    o f

    c o u r s e . . . a n d

    h is a tta ck in g wi th h is

    a i r c r a f t

    would be c oo rd in at ed w it h o the r

    a ir cr af t th a t

    would at tack

    the Vtak

    pos i t ions

    on the ground.

    Also,

    he would make multiple

    passes a t the tank

    unintelligible )

    Gene ra lly s pe ak in g, the re

    would

    on ly be

    one

    i n i n t e l l i g i b l e

    QUESTION:

    What

    so r t

    o f a i r c r a f t

    provided Zak

    suppress ion?

    ANSWER ;

    There were two an t i - t ank squadrons in h is w ing. Pardon

    me,

    t h e r e

    was

    on ly one an t i - t ank f l i g h t o f a i r c r a f t , it was

    ca l l ed a i r c r a f t un in te l l i g ib l e

    a

    very s t rong squadron o f

    a i r c r a f t . What he would

    do

    i n an a t t a ck , the re would

    be

    o the r

    Stuka

    in

    h is

    wing

    t h a t

    normal

    Stuka^

    without

    the

    cannons

    on,

    would

    bomb,

    would a t t ack the

    fZak

    pos i t i ons through coordina ted

    effort

    QUESTION;

    13

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    19/117

    TAPE

    I IDE I

    Were these

    bombs

    (unintelligible)

    ANSWER;

    The Stuka.

    would carry a

    om

    that

    could

    unintelligible)

    and the

    bombs

    had a fuse

    in

    them

    that was

    set

    at 50 cm at that

    time, which would allow them to

    explode above

    the ground un

    intelligible) , They

    would

    carry about a 4 pound om inside,

    similar

    to our Rockeye ,

    QUESTION:

    How long

    un in te l l ig ib le

    ANSWER:

    Abou t 50

    s e cond s .

    QUESTION:

    Would you ask him to give us a review of the attack pro

    file, dive angle, air speed altitude, when he d generally try

    to ro l l in ,

    tha t

    type of

    thing?

    ANSWER:

    If

    they

    had

    a cloud deck

    of 200

    meters and they

    had

    to

    fly underneath that and then with a very relatively

    flat

    at

    tack angle. They didn't take into account the height of the

    clouds...When they were not paying attention

    to, their

    cloud

    decks, then they would normally start between 800 and 1500

    meters. They would circle around until they found the tank

    itself. The problem

    was

    not actually shooting or killing

    the tank, but i t was finding

    the

    tank. Being able to vis

    ually

    acquire their target, that

    is

    where

    they spent

    most of

    their time. e added too

    that

    speed

    was

    poison f or finding

    4

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    20/117

    TA PE

    I

    S I D E

    I

    ta r^ .

    Normally they

    would

    fly at 25

    kilometers

    but

    when

    they were

    at

    an angle of 2 to 3 degrees they would dive

    I t would

    be

    about.. 320.

    They had aerodynamic problems with

    the aircraft. If you got

    at

    32 kilometers you d ge t ossi-

    lations

    Q U E S T I O N :

    T his

    was

    o n l y the

    cannon

    a i rc ra f t ?

    A N S W E R :

    Yes

    th i s was

    f o r t h e

    cannon. Th e

    cannon

    would

    n o t f i re

    accurately i f you went over

    350.

    The regular ai rcraf t would

    g o

    4 5 0

    i n

    a

    d i v e .

    Q U E S T I O N ;

    Kilometers

    per hour hou re talking

    about?

    A N S W E R ;

    E ve r ything

    i s in k ilo m ete rs p er h o u r.

    The

    cannon

    i t s e l f was th e

    c o n t r o l l i n g

    fac tor . I t

    wa s

    def ina te ly th e

    aerodynamics

    of th e

    c ann on w hic h

    l i m i t e d t h e

    airspeed. Normally thei r landing speed

    was 180

    an d

    thei r

    crusing was 250

    Because

    the cannon was the most important

    thing they would

    le t the

    cannon control

    a ll of the

    speed.

    was

    th e th in g t h a t

    act u al l y

    k i l l e d

    th e tank

    so

    every

    t h i n g

    e l s e

    fell

    to

    th e

    s i d e .

    Q U E S T I O N ;

    180 k i l o m e t e r s fo r

    th i s l andi ng

    w ith

    the

    a i r c ra f t . . .

    with th e cannon un in te l l ig ib le

    A N S W E R ;

    15

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    21/117

    TAPE I

    S I D E

    I

    A b o u t 1 4 0

    Q U E S T I O N :

    Pierre

    mentioned something about speed

    is

    poison?

    A N S W E R :

    Yes

    there is ju st

    a

    l i t t l e phrase a t the

    end

    of

    what he

    was saying about that the essence is to find tanks nce you

    find

    them you can shoot them

    with

    a

    reasonable

    candor and

    the phrase

    he

    used was that in finding tanks speed is poison

    Q U E S T I O N :

    C o u l d I q u o t e t h a t ?

    A N S W E R :

    Ask him it i s not my statement. L e t s not take i t out of

    context

    e

    says

    that

    really speed is

    absolutely catastrophic

    and i t is a poison when you are

    trying

    to k i l l a tank because

    yo u can

    g e t

    too f a s t You w i l l ov er shoot

    th e

    tank and then

    y o u v e

    w a s t e d y o u r

    m i s s i o n .

    Q U E S T I O N :

    Before

    Tom comes in

    l e t s finish developing our

    point.

    General Smith

    said

    don t

    quote

    i t out

    of

    context.

    advocate

    low speeds for descrimination General Smith your point is

    g o i n g t o b e

    w h a t ?

    A N S W E R :

    You ve g ot to

    take

    the

    whole warfare into context. In

    other words i f you can t survive what surrounds you you are

    not going

    to survive the shoot.

    Speed

    is catastrophic

    when

    you a re t r y i n g to find something

    an d

    a

    tank

    i s n o t too much

    6

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    22/117

    TAPE I SIDE I

    different

    from

    a truck.

    If

    you are in foliage the slower

    you can go

    certainly

    improves your eyeball action capability

    and then you ve got to keep in sight everything that is going

    around

    you

    too.

    ou

    know

    the equation balances out very

    quickly;

    what

    is coming

    at

    you determines your speed

    and if

    y o u r e going

    to

    survive

    th e

    k i l l .

    Q U E S T I O N ;

    This is the

    question that

    I was going to ask. We ve

    mentioned that they did try

    Vlak

    suppression but

    we haven t

    mentioned what other kinds of air defense flying

    you

    were

    under

    while

    you

    were

    circling looking for tanks.

    While

    you

    were flying 25 kilometers at a couple of hundred meters.

    What about rifle

    firing,

    what about machine

    gun firing,

    what

    about

    a ll of th e other things that

    you would encounter. ow

    d id

    y ou

    avo id t he se?

    A N S W E R ;

    They

    had

    to deal

    with everything

    from

    pistols

    on up and

    they had

    soldiers

    that had fallen on

    their

    backs

    who

    would

    just

    shoot

    up into

    the a ir and

    when you had

    100

    soldiers in

    front of the tanks or with the tanks

    and you

    just

    had

    to pass

    through

    i t

    and you encountered

    unintelligible).

    e says

    that he

    often

    had

    3

    or 4

    hits

    in the airplane

    and

    as long

    as none

    of

    those

    hi t s ,

    a ll

    calib ers,

    as

    long

    as

    none

    of

    those

    hits were in the radiator, i t really wasn t a big problem.

    U n in te l l i g ib l e ,

    EN D TA P E I

    S I D E

    I

    7

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    23/117

    T A P E

    I

    S I D E

    II

    ANSWER CON T:

    . . . u n t i l such time as

    he

    has through h is experience and

    seat of the pants f eel i n g and he could see- the

    s lant

    range to

    the

    tank, he would r o l l out just for a second, stabilize his

    platform and

    fire

    and then immediately

    start

    jinking again.

    That 3 a very

    important

    point,

    le t me

    emphasize

    that,

    I went

    over t h a t with Colonel Rudel,

    He

    says th a t h is

    l ine

    up time

    from

    wings level

    until firing

    with

    the

    cannon

    was

    between 1

    and 1

    1/2

    seconds, and I believe t h a t s accurate because he

    quotes for

    bombing

    3 to 4 seconds line up time for experienced

    pilots.

    He said,

    however,

    there

    was no

    way

    you could

    get

    a

    pilot out of ordinary training to be able to

    hit

    a tank with

    only one second line up time. the other hand, he said i t

    was absolutely

    essential for

    survival to hold i t down

    to

    that.

    And of course, in an

    airplane, that would

    be

    less

    limited by

    i ts cannons, you know that one second for cannons versus three

    or four seconds for bombing^ in and of i t s e l f would be a

    tr e

    mendous

    survival advantage.

    Younger

    p i l o t s , to continue

    aug

    menting what

    Mr

    Sprey said, had a lo t of difficulty because

    they c ou ld n t, q uite

    frankly, they couldn t

    see

    the same

    slant

    ranges

    that

    Col. Rudel could.

    They

    simply

    didn t

    have

    the

    experience and

    hadn t

    had enough practice

    to

    be

    able to

    roll

    out

    ju s t

    momentarily and

    le t

    two rounds go and

    st a rt

    jinking again.

    The

    majority of the losses

    that

    they

    had

    with

    the

    antitank aircraft

    were in a phase where

    the pilot

    would

    roll out, track

    th e target and then

    fire.

    I might add

    that

    just based

    on

    a conversation with Col.

    Rudel

    yesterday,

    that

    8

    -.N

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    24/117

    T A P E

    I S IDE

    you had

    to

    be very canny

    in

    working with

    the

    Russians

    said o f t e n

    he

    would come i n t o

    the

    area^ a wooded a r e a an d

    finally after making several

    orbits

    he would spot a

    tank

    and

    then

    he

    said

    something would just

    not

    look rig h t to

    him i t would look

    fishy

    and so he would m y e wait ten

    more minutes an d then he might spot a fZdk b a tte r y o r they

    would

    f i n a l l y

    j u s t g et disgusted with waiting and they would

    open up on him They would expend a ll of

    their

    munitions

    tha t they

    ha d a t th e

    time

    and

    then

    he could go in and at t ack

    the

    tank

    a f t e r

    the

    enemy had expended

    a ll

    of

    t h e i r

    flak

    a t

    him.

    I t i s very

    i n d i v i d u a l

    th e way

    t h a t

    a pi lo t i s

    going

    to

    a t tack

    t anks

    He

    r a t es

    tha t

    a s

    a

    v ery im p or ta nt f ac to r

    in

    surv iva l

    in a d d i t i o n to th e t ac t i c s t ha t he

    i s

    ta lk ing

    a b o u t .

    T ha t se n se

    fo r a t ac t i ca l s i tua t ion f o r t e l l i ng

    when

    t h e r e wa s

    a fZak

    t rap

    se t up

    and

    when

    t h e r e

    w a s n t .

    He

    r e fe rs to

    it

    a s

    j u s t i n tu i t ion

    and

    a lso

    cons t an t

    e x p o s u r e

    to

    get that sixth sense

    i t

    is

    absolutely

    essential to

    be flying

    every single day.

    A few weeks away from

    the front

    you

    lose

    c o n t a c t

    wi t h th e

    si tuat ion

    yo u l o s e

    c o n t a c t w ith th e l a tes t

    tac t ics o f th e enemy He

    says

    it i s very dangerous when yo u

    come back af ter you ve been o u t o f

    c o n t a c t

    fo r a few weeks.

    Q U E S T I O N :

    He s a id he

    t y p i cal l y operated

    from 1500

    meters

    from th e

    front?

    A N S W E R :

    No 1500 meters i n

    c r u i s e al t i tude

    9

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    25/117

    TAPE

    I

    S I D E II

    Q U E S T I O N :

    Okay t h e n ho w t y p i c a l l y

    ANSWER;

    Your

    q ue stio n a s

    to

    how

    fa r

    de pen de d o n

    th e

    par t icu la r

    time o f

    th e

    war and where th e

    ai r f ie ld

    happened to be. I t

    could be anywhere from 17 to 1 kilometers.

    I t

    i s impossible

    to

    say.

    But he d e fi na te ly s tr es se s experience. I t was a very

    important thing. That i s why i t was impossible for young people

    to

    survive

    the

    way he did because

    they

    did not have the exper

    i e n c e

    Q U E S T I O N :

    One

    other

    ques t ion

    a l o n g t ha t same

    l i n e

    when he arr ived

    in

    target

    area

    I assume t hat he had no problem finding a

    target

    a re a w a s th ere any c o n t r o l

    at

    all o v e r th e A ir F o r c e l i k e to

    da y with a i r b o r n e

    a ir

    cont rol lers

    and

    so for th o r

    d id

    he have

    to be

    b r o u g h t

    in

    by ex te rna l means?

    A N S W E R ;

    He

    s tr e ss e s p a r ti cu l a rl y experience. With

    th e young

    pi lo t

    the ai rcraf t

    f l y s

    the

    pi lo t With the very

    expereinced pi lot

    i t is the p i l o t t h a t is flying

    the

    machine.

    says t h a t he

    pract ical ly

    s lept in his machine.

    He d

    be going from

    3

    i n th e

    morning

    unt i l ei g h t o r

    nine

    in

    the

    evening.

    He was

    constantly

    with

    the

    m a c h i n e

    i t s e l f

    an d

    it was

    th e

    f a c t

    t h a t

    he had

    t o t a l

    cont ro l o v e r

    h is a i r c r a f t

    t ha t

    made

    the b ig di f fe rence

    C H A I R M A N :

    Excuse me fo r j u s t a m i n u t e . We ve been g o i n g for o ne

    2

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    26/117

    TAPE I SIDE

    II

    hour now Suppose we take a 15 minute break. We ve

    only

    scratched the surface of

    Mr. Christie s

    question. I don t

    know

    the size of the flights I

    don t

    know the

    tactics

    en

    volved. I

    don t

    know

    the coordination of the captain.

    We

    will open up session with those kind of questions. Did he

    rendezvous how was

    i t

    controlled

    how

    did they get there

    how d id they ge t back?

    I N TERM I S S I O N

    CHAIRMAN:

    I

    appreciate

    the p atien ce

    of

    everybody

    a t

    this

    time.

    have

    made a few changes. One is that Ive

    asked

    here

    because he speaks fluent Geirman

    Mr

    Sprey to sit up here

    so that

    we

    get

    the full

    impact

    of

    what

    is

    being

    translated.

    I t

    is

    easy

    to

    lose some

    of

    what

    is

    being translated. Sec

    ondly there

    was a suggestion made and I concur t h a t what

    we Qught to do i s set up a random shotgun b la st in g r at he r

    than

    questions

    t h a t

    bounce l l

    around to ll

    kinds of is

    sues

    th t we ta k e phases o f

    th e

    problem and we res t r i t

    questions

    to

    you

    know

    l i ke command

    and

    control

    o r

    whatever

    one

    t a

    time

    and

    st a y with it unt i l

    we have

    exhausted it

    to

    our

    satisfaction

    then

    press

    on to the

    next topic

    area.

    There

    was

    one other

    thing

    they have to have the tape

    re

    corder

    down

    here

    to get

    a

    better

    pick up and

    they

    have

    asked

    me

    to ask everybody to speak up when they ask

    the

    questions so

    th t it i s picked up

    an d

    i f

    not

    fo r me to

    repeat the questions to make sure th at i t is

    picked

    up

    2

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    27/117

    T A P E

    I S I D E II

    o n t h e r e c o r d e r

    Q U E S T I O N :

    What a r e

    you going t o do w i t h t h e t a p e ?

    Q U E S T I O N :

    Who s d o i n g th e ta p in g ?

    B i l l

    McLaurin

    A N S W E R ;

    Yes i f

    I may

    B i l l McLaurin

    i s a

    p r o f e s s i o n a l

    jour

    n a l i s t .

    th o u g h t

    it

    m i g h t be v e r y good

    i f he

    wro t e a

    pie c e

    on how he

    se e s

    th e

    discussion then pa ss

    it around to

    the

    p e o p l e wh o

    w e r e h e r e t o

    make

    s u r e

    it was a t r u t h f u l r e f l e c t i o n

    o f

    Col.

    Rude l s

    comments.

    That was th e

    i d e a

    to

    g e t

    a profes

    sional jo u rn alist

    so to

    speak to give

    an interpretation.

    C H A I R M A N :

    L e t

    me

    make

    an o b s e r v a t i o n it i s a v e i w p o i n t o f

    mine

    an d

    I

    d o n t

    know i f

    it

    i s held by

    anybody e l s e ,

    bu t

    Col. Rudel

    h a s

    had

    enormous

    e x p e r i e n c e , b u t

    i n

    a

    d i f f e r e n t

    e r a

    u n d e r

    d i f

    f e r e n t

    c o n d i t i o n s an d

    d i f f e r e n t t i m e s and I t h i n k it i s incum

    b e n t

    u p o n u s

    wh o

    h a v e

    some i n f l u e n c e

    o n t h i s e r a o n t h i s t i m e

    t h a t we l i s t e n t o

    t h e

    h i s t o r y a s it w ere and we a r e

    e a c h

    r e s

    ponsible for how

    well

    t ha t t ra n sl at es

    into

    t o d a y s world.

    I t

    may

    n o t t r a n s l a t e

    a t a l l o r

    it

    m i g h t

    be

    a lm o st

    100 p e r c e n t

    t r a n s l a t e a b l e with each o f

    u s .

    a r e not

    he re

    to

    q u a r r e l

    with

    what

    happened 3 years

    ago

    we a re

    here

    to

    find

    out what

    happened

    30 y e a r s a g o .

    With

    t h a t ,

    I d

    l i k e t o

    p i c k up

    w i t h where Mr C h r i s t i e s

    q u e s t i o n dropped o f f . T h a t i s , we a r e

    t r y i n g

    to b u i l d th e

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    28/117

    TAPE I 3IDE

    II

    scenario that took place more or less typically

    and

    I guess

    when you really get

    down

    to it, there is no such thing as a

    typical mission Questions like

    how many

    people flew in the

    flight?

    as

    i t

    a flight of one a

    flight

    of two or

    was i t

    squadron

    size.

    Did he meet up with cover, was

    that

    standard?

    ow did he support his organization?

    as

    i t controlled

    by

    ground controllers? Those kind of questions Neil can you

    go ahead

    and

    start that off there and

    that

    will open i t up

    ANSWER:

    e

    would

    usually

    go out

    alone.

    e

    would

    start

    early.

    ed be the f irst one out to reconnoite r the area. When the

    report

    was that there would only be ten tanks, that they

    were looking for ten to 15 then he

    would

    be followed up

    with a very small

    flight

    of usually about 12 sometimes only

    six or seven of those

    aircraft.

    e added that

    he would

    fly

    with a squadron

    size

    unintelligible ,

    a normal squadron

    was

    12 to 16

    aircraft,

    but

    because of

    the

    maintainance difficulties

    and so

    forth,

    they could only

    put six or

    seven up

    in the

    air.

    If

    there

    was a stronger enemy formation

    of

    artillery and

    tanks and so

    forth,

    instead of

    flying

    a squadron

    level,

    they

    would fly at a group level. Theoretically 27 aircraft , in

    reality, 15 aircraft. gain they

    would

    fly in a unintelligible

    QUESTION:

    What sort of did they have with

    the

    top cover?

    The

    fighter

    ircr f t

    were

    there

    prior rendezvous

    arrangements or

    was

    the cover against

    the

    Soviet opposi ti on?

    3

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    29/117

    TAPE

    I

    S I D E II

    ANSWER:

    1 11 answer his

    question,

    bu t just

    to

    clear up any con--

    f u s i o n , I ll

    run

    through t h e .

    Q U E S T I O N :

    I

    w a n t

    to

    know

    why y ou l aughed

    A N S W E R :

    Because he

    said

    t h a t

    t h e i r

    coiranunications,

    normally

    were

    te le phonic

    l a n d l i n e s tha t functioned par t o f th e time and

    fun

    ctioned part of

    the

    time not. So, that was one of

    their pr o

    blems.

    The

    levels

    a t which

    they

    would work, would be

    unint

    elligible)

    squadrons; smaller than our squadrons,

    maybe

    12 -

    16

    air cr af t .

    From there, you would go

    to

    a G tappe which was

    three

    squadrons plus a

    staff flight. rom

    there you would go

    to

    a which was

    three

    G/iapen.

    rom there,

    you would

    go

    to

    a LaitdZxjl^lon o r a Lu{tKoA.p^, which

    would

    be an a i^

    division

    or

    Air

    Corps, From

    there,

    to

    a

    Luitilottz

    which would

    be an a ir

    f lee t i t

    would be

    j u s t the

    level of command .

    In

    Col. Rudel*s c a s e , h i s

    wing would

    be

    subordinated

    to an

    A ir

    C o rp s , t h r o u g h

    l a n d l i ne s

    would

    coordina te w i t h

    c lose

    a i r

    support units l i ke

    Col.Rudel s and with

    fighter

    uni t s. They

    would

    s e t

    a

    rendezcous point

    and they would

    supposedly meet

    th eir

    a ir

    cover prior to going into

    attacking

    their

    targets.

    In

    pract i ce,

    Gol.Rudel s

    support a i rc ra ft would arrive only

    about one-half o f the time. There

    would

    be d i f f e r e n t excuses;

    they would say they were

    attacked

    in route, they were engaged

    e l s e w h e r e , the we a the r wa s

    to o bad

    and

    so for th .

    In R u s s i a

    24

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    30/117

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    31/117

    TAPE

    I

    S I D E

    II

    German l ine a t

    one

    poin t and the Germans in to

    the

    Russians

    l ine

    at

    another

    point. I t was an extremely diff icul t

    problem

    for

    him

    to

    discern

    which

    were

    friendly

    and

    which were enemy

    and,

    of

    course, that was

    the big thing that occupied his

    time. I t was very diff icul t especially when

    they

    were

    re

    ceiving

    Vlak,

    because the

    posit ions

    on the ground

    were

    so

    close

    and the tendency would be t o i f

    they^re flying

    a-

    round up

    there

    and

    they s t a r t

    get t ing shot

    a t

    they d say,

    Well, we re get t ing shot a t

    so

    obv ious ly t hose

    are

    not

    Ger

    mans. In real i ty

    it

    wasn t the case because the

    troops

    were

    so in te rmixed

    so in terwoven

    with one another on th e

    ground.

    said

    that

    he

    had to sometimes

    make

    as

    many

    as

    five or six

    passes for

    identification

    alone (unintelligible).

    QUESTION;

    Were there cases o f

    complaints

    o f

    inexperienced Stuka

    pilots

    shooting

    up

    f i rendly, as

    happened

    to us,

    was tha t a

    c o n s t a n t

    prob lem

    or

    ANSWER:

    This,

    of

    course,

    occurred, but one did not see i t very

    of t en

    It

    happened to Col. Rudel on

    one

    occas ion . It was th e

    regulation

    in

    his wing that none

    of the

    pilots in

    his

    wing

    could

    drop ord inance

    any

    closer

    than he,

    himself,

    per sona lly d id

    He also

    said

    tha t he control led when

    they

    bombed

    a t a l l so

    the l a s t

    decis ion

    before

    bombing

    was h i t

    QUESTION:

    I was thinking in par t icular i f the case of using

    the

    26

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    32/117

    TAPE I

    S I D E

    II

    SJtuka G with

    the

    37 mm whether there were cases where

    inexperienced

    pilots

    actually

    shot

    up

    individual

    German

    armored

    fighting units?

    Germans

    because

    of misidentification

    stress wha t e v e r

    A N S W E R :

    I t happened to Col. Rudel

    personally. F ortunately the

    bomb

    m issed

    and th e gu y jumped o u t o f th e tank and waved

    a t

    him.

    I t

    was a

    Tiger

    tank and the guy,

    very

    shocked and

    frightened po ppe d o pen the hatch an d waved a t him

    Q U E S T I O N :

    Let s pursue t h a t a l i t t le

    further

    then.. .did they ever

    have any ground

    control-or

    ground a ssis ta nc e in ta rg et id en ti

    f ica t ion and what marking d e v i c e s would be used?

    A N S W E R ;

    He said t h a t in the Panzer divisions which you have to

    remember

    were

    e l i t e

    divis ions

    they

    had

    O f f i c e r s

    who were on

    the ground in

    tanks

    with radios.

    They were in

    very close communication. There is probably

    a

    b e t t e r

    way

    to

    i n t r o d u c e

    th i s s u b j e c t .

    Th e 1 4 t h

    Panzer Division

    had

    one

    Panzer l e f t a t

    the time

    of t h i s

    incident

    and

    the

    commanding

    general of th e u n i t

    t o l d

    Col. Rudel t h a t he

    was

    going to

    use

    t h a t

    t a n k

    as

    a

    r ad io t ank

    P u t

    in h is

    Lia ison

    off icer He

    took th e cannons

    o u t

    in order to g e t th e

    radios

    i n . He said that the conversation the exchange was f a r

    m o r e impo r t an t

    to

    h im th an w heth er t h a t o n e P an zer co uld

    shoot o r not. The

    St LLk cii

    gave him the

    p o ssib ili ty o f attacking

    27

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    33/117

    TAPE I

    S I D E II

    targets

    that

    he

    needed attacked

    and obviously

    with

    vastly greater

    f ire power

    than

    that

    one

    tank

    could give

    him That introduces the importance of t h i s l i a i s o n .

    But

    t h e

    f a c t

    t h a t

    t h e r e were LuitmUe

    Liaison

    o f f i c e r s

    mounted in

    specia l

    tanks had

    radios

    t h a t

    were

    on the a i r -

    to ground frequency of

    the

    JU 87 and they were

    in

    constant

    very close contact They announced what they needed done

    what targets they needed

    i f

    they could pinpoint them they

    would pinpoint them i f they only

    kn w they

    were taking

    f i r e from a

    certain

    area they would ask them to

    search

    for

    them. So

    they were in

    very

    close tact ical contact

    Col Rudel

    says

    t h a t if

    they

    had no t

    had

    t h a t

    kind o f

    arrangement t h e

    war would have

    been

    over i n

    1943

    T h a t s

    how

    c r i t i c a l it

    was

    to

    the overal l success of

    t h i s

    close

    s u p p o r t

    effort

    QUESTIONS

    own

    to what level were these pat ro l

    u n i t s ,

    did he

    tell

    you? How

    many?

    ANSWER:

    There

    was one p e r

    d i v i s i o n , so

    t h a t would be

    d i v i s i o n

    level liaison

    QUESTION:

    U n i n t e l l i g i b l e ) Movement around the b a t t l e f i e ld i s

    terr ibly confusing and diverse i t seems to

    m

    tha t they

    obvious ly

    c o u l d n t b e ev erywhere

    a t once

    28

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    34/117

    TAPE

    I S I D E

    II

    A N S W E R :

    You ve

    g o t t o

    remember

    t h a t th e s e were small

    divisions. They were more like

    our

    brigades. Somewhere

    between o u r

    b r i g a d e

    l e v e l and d i v i s i o n

    l e v e l .

    This was, o f

    c o u r s e , up to th e

    d i v i s i o n

    commander

    where

    to

    put the

    aptim ^ Liaison Officer)

    but he was

    normally to

    be found a l l the way up

    front

    with

    the

    spearhead

    of th e armored di vi si on and t h a t was

    j u s t

    th e a s s i s t a n c e

    t h e y

    g a v e

    t h e

    d i v i s i o n

    c o m m a n d e r s .

    NE W V O I C E ;

    You know through, P e te , Tom it seems

    to

    me t h a t

    when you

    have

    friendly

    versus

    enemy you

    g e t

    into a

    large

    mass o f tank b a t t l e s the th in g t h a t u n i n t e l l i g i b l e )

    i s

    going to be very

    murky

    u n i n t e l l i g i b l e ) .

    P e o p l e

    is

    t h e

    w r o n g w o r d .

    It i s going to be d i f f i c u l t

    in

    f a c t i f t h e r e

    was

    some

    kind

    o f marking c a p a b i l i t y to keep

    tr a c k o f

    w h a t s

    out there

    T h a t s

    wh y it i s t o i m p o r t a n t t o

    t r a i n

    t h e f o r c e

    b e f o r e

    the bat tle s ta rt s

    S o w h a t ?

    So i m p o r t a n t to

    t r a i n

    th e f o r c e b e f o r e you

    g e t in

    t h a t

    situation

    Yeah

    29

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    35/117

    TAPE

    I S IDE

    II

    ANSWER:

    In

    add it ion to the Panzer

    div i s ions

    t he re

    were

    l i a i son

    of f i ce r s with 2 other e l i t e groups. The

    unin

    t e l l i g i b l e

    were

    no t o rgan ic to

    th e d iv i s i on

    because

    the re

    were not enough of them to go around. In fac t

    they

    were

    only a ss ig ned to div is ions

    tha t

    were

    r ig h t in the

    th ick of

    it

    Any divis ion t ha t

    was

    off

    the l i ne or

    j u s t

    holding

    or

    something

    t h ey pu ll e d th e Lia i son

    Of f i c e r and

    ass igned him to

    th e

    rep lacement d iv i s i on .

    QUESTION;

    What was

    th e l i n e

    o f

    au thor i ty? Did these

    l i a i s on

    o f f i c e r s

    have th e au tho r i ty to d i r e c t a i r c r a f t ? What was

    t h e i r

    au tho r i t y ?

    ANSWER:

    w

    jus t

    one

    minute

    f i r s t

    answer the

    previous quest ion

    Yes

    we

    have

    a

    p r ev i ou s ques t i on

    t h a t

    has

    no t

    been

    translated

    And

    th e q ue stio n was about

    whether

    or not

    you

    used

    p i l o t s as t he se

    forward

    con t ro l l e r s

    o r l i a i s on

    o f f i c e r s .

    ANSWER:

    No there

    were

    no pi lo t s t ha t were used. They were

    Officers who had

    speical

    t ra in ing one

    year

    schooling

    fo r th i s par t icular chore tha t

    they

    were

    doing.

    They were

    mostly used

    j us t as l ia ison of f i ce r s .

    They

    did not have

    any

    command a uth ority o r anything. They would

    inform

    the a i r

    uni t s

    how th e d iv is io n was deployed on the

    30

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    36/117

    TAPE I

    S I D E

    II

    b a t t l e f i e l d

    where t h e y

    w e r e

    where

    t h e f r i e n d l y

    t r o o p s

    were and

    where

    t h ey s us pe ct e d t h e enemies

    were . e

    d i d n t

    have

    any

    command

    a u t h o r i t y .

    The

    o r g a n i z a t i o n

    c h a r t

    would

    have t h e

    F l i e g e r A i r

    D i v i s i o n o r A i r Corps

    a s Col .

    Rudel s

    commander and h e

    was

    t h e o r e t i c a l l y

    r e sp o n si b le t o him.

    However b e c a u s e o f h i s e x p e r i e n c e

    i n n o v a t i o n

    and

    p r e v i o u s

    employment

    he i n e f f e c t had a f r e e hand w i t h

    o p e r a t i o n s . . .

    t h a t was g i v e n

    t o

    o t h e r e x p e r i e n c e d l e a d e r s a l s o b u t o n l y

    v er y e xp e r i e n c ed o n e s.

    They

    would

    be

    s e n t from one a r e a t o

    a n o t h e r a s t h e need

    a r o s e and t h a t would come from

    h i g h e r

    a u t h o r i t y .

    But a s

    f a r a s employment w i t h i n h i s

    a r e a

    t h e a u t h o r i t y t o r e l e a s e

    h i s bombs

    was

    left t o him b e c a u s e o f h i s e x p e r i e n c e

    and

    h i s

    p r i o r

    s u c c e s s .

    e knew

    more

    t h a n h i s

    commanders

    knew and

    t he y re co gn iz ed

    it and

    s a i d

    i n e ff e c t you f a c t a

    f r e e hand

    i n

    what

    you

    a r e

    d o i n g .

    S t a r t

    o u t w i t h t h e q u e s t i o n .

    What

    was t h e q u e s t i o n ?

    The q u e s t i o n was d i d o t h e r commanders were

    t h e y

    h e l d

    responsib le to the higher

    echelon o f

    the

    command th e

    Air

    D i v i s i o n s a n d A i r C o r p s ?

    ANSWER:

    C o l . R u d e l s a i d t h a t t h e r e

    w e r e

    a f e w o f

    c o u r s e

    if

    t h e commander o f t h e i n d i v i d u a l wing o r g r o u p was a new

    commander

    then

    t h e c o n t r o l t h a t th e

    Air

    Divis ion commander

    would e x e r c i s e

    would

    o f c o u r s e

    be much

    more

    s t r i n g e n t

    t h a n

    h e would

    w i t h someone l i k e C o l Rudel

    However b e c a u s e

    o f

    t h e

    3

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    37/117

    TAPE

    I S I D E II

    core of experienced people t h a t they had a v a il a bl e f o r

    commanders by

    the

    end of the

    war

    there were very, very few

    wing

    commanders

    t h a t

    had

    t o

    be

    subordinated

    to

    the A ir

    C o r p s

    commander , i n

    t h a t m a n n e r .

    For the inexperienced squadron leaders

    unintelligible ,

    the

    Flieger Corps l e v e l

    the

    Air Corps l e v e l

    t o l d

    them

    e x a c t l y where

    to

    bomb o r gave them exa ct c o or di na te s and

    they

    had to bomb

    there.

    They

    had

    no freedom

    of

    action,

    f o r t he i nexper ienced

    people, and

    they

    bombed

    there even

    i f there were f r iendly t roops r i g h t

    a t

    those coordinates .

    Col.

    Rudel

    came

    back from a mission

    and

    he s a i d

    t h a t

    they

    had not

    destroyed a l l of the Russian

    tanks

    or

    troops

    in a particular

    area

    and he wanted to

    return to

    that

    parti

    c u l a r t a rg e t t o

    f i n i s h

    up, if t h e r e

    was

    a c o n f l i c t between

    what he thought

    and what

    the

    Air Corps commander

    thought

    tha t

    the Air

    orps commander had a more

    important

    target ,

    the,

    of

    course. Col. Rudel

    was

    ordered

    to

    the

    more

    important

    target

    QUESTION:

    I d

    l i k e t o ask him a two p a r t

    ques t ion .

    Could he

    g i v e

    us a b r i e f

    d e s c r i p t i o n

    o f how he r e a ct e d t o an a i r

    request,

    where

    did

    it

    come

    from

    and

    how

    did

    it

    actually

    get

    t o him. I n r e ad in g h i s book, I s e e t h a t

    some

    o f h i s m i s s i o n s

    were

    almost

    on

    his

    own

    i n i t i a t i v e .

    He

    went

    out s o r t

    of hunting

    a s

    a g a i n s t r e a c ti n g t o a r e q u e s t a s we

    would

    t o o u r own

    t a c t i c a l

    a i r

    c o n t r o l

    s y s t e m . Aid t h e n i n

    t h o s e a r e a s t h a t

    were

    32

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    38/117

    TAPE I SIDE II

    within the range of

    friendly

    units did he ever have

    coordination with the

    artillery

    that helped him soften

    up

    the

    area

    so

    to

    speak

    in

    suppression?

    Did he

    ever

    use the a r t i l l e ry

    ANSWER:

    t would be

    the

    f ront d iv is ion commanders tha t

    woul

    place their

    requests

    and

    m ny

    times the

    rmy requests

    would be to 3 at a

    time

    Of course this would far

    exceed

    the assets

    tha t

    they had

    END

    OP

    TAPE I

    SIDE

    II

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    39/117

    T A P E II

    S I D E

    The f i n a l d e c i s i o n on

    who

    would

    r e c e i v e

    t h e h e l p

    was

    made by t h e A i r C o r p s . It a p p a r e n t l y

    was

    n e i t h e r

    j o i n t conference o f d i v i s i o n commanders nor

    h ig he r th an

    A ir Corps The l a s t

    d e c i s i o n ,

    a f t e r r e ce iv in g th e

    r e

    q u e s t s

    and

    t h e reasons from t h e

    d i v i s i o n

    commanders

    was

    made

    at

    t h e

    A i r Co rp s l e v e l

    on who

    would a c t u a l l y

    r e c e i v e t h e

    h e l p .

    QUESTION:

    Yes you

    s a i d

    something

    u n i n t e l l i g i b l e )

    c o n v e r s a t i o n

    u n i n t e l l i g i b l e ) .

    You

    s a i d t h a t even

    though

    t h e r e were

    u n i n t e l l i g i b l e )

    o f t h o s e who were i s s u i n g t h e o r d e r s

    and e x e c u t i n g

    t h a t m i s s i o n

    u n i n t e l l i g i b l e ) t a c t i c a l

    b a t t l e ,

    w o u l d n t

    t h e r e

    b e

    some

    p r o c e s s

    o f u p d at i n g

    u n i n t e l l i g i b l e ) .

    ANSWER:

    It was c l e a r t h a t

    German pilot g r o u p commander

    squadron

    commander

    whatever w o u l d n t knowingly

    a t t a c k

    German

    t r o o p s .

    t h i n k

    what

    h e meant b e f o r e was t h a t

    if t h e r e

    was

    some f r i e n d l i e s

    you

    c o u l d n t s e e

    o n

    t h e

    ground t h e y

    were o r d e r e d

    t o

    a t t a c k t h e r e and n a t u r a l l y

    t h e y w o u l d .

    T h e r e

    w a s ,

    t h e o r e t i c a l l y ,

    s y s t e m o f u p d a t e ,

    b u t

    it

    was so c o m p l i c a t e d

    and

    f l u i d t h e r e , t h a t it

    se ldom

    f u n c t i o n e d . It

    was d e p e n d e n t

    upon how f a r away

    they

    were

    from th e c o n t r o l s ,

    how f a r away

    they

    were

    from

    34

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    40/117

    T A P E

    S IDE

    t h e i r ow n

    base s ,

    from

    th e Corps I f they were 300

    k i lome te r s

    from

    th e A ir

    Corps t h e i r

    rad ios

    could

    no t

    func t ion a t t h a t d i s t ance ,

    so it

    had to

    be

    s t r i c t l y

    a t th e

    knowledge

    o f

    th e f l i g h t commander

    as to

    whether

    o r no t

    t hey

    would a t t a c k . He s a i d

    t h a t

    th e German s o l d i e r s

    on th e ground . . . , it was seldom

    t h a t they would

    have

    t roub le

    d i s c e r n ing which were t h e i r

    own

    s o l d i e r s , in

    t h a t s it u a ti o n ,

    because

    o f t h e

    PZak

    o t h e r t h an , a s

    we

    s a id

    be fo r e , when t hey were mixing i n one w ith a no th er.

    But normally

    the f tak

    was

    so

    in tense

    t ha t

    t h ey . . . , an

    inexper ienced man would say

    t h a t th a t i s th e

    place t h a t

    normal ly

    they

    (un in te l l i g ib l e ) t h a t t h e r e

    was

    no t

    g r e a t

    d i f f i cu l t y

    t e l l i n g w hich w ere

    th e

    f r i e nd l i e s

    and

    no t .

    The

    German

    f r i end ly so l d i e r s would have

    f l a r e s i gna l

    they would u s e , so t h a t t h ey cou ld i d en t i fy themse lves .

    I f

    the

    Siuk a6 w ere

    to f ly

    over

    and

    t he re

    was

    no

    s i gna l ,

    they would c i r c l e aga in .

    Knowing th e c i r c l e ,

    t h e i r own

    t r oops would

    use

    th e

    f l a r e

    s ig n a l to

    say we re

    Ge rman , a n d don t bomb us.

    QUESTION;

    I d l i k e t o go back

    to h is

    f l i g h t

    c on t r o l .

    He in

    d i c a t ed

    t h a t

    th e

    first

    s h o t ou t o f th e b a r r e l in th e day

    t ime was h i s . Look a t th e s i t u a t i o n and t h en qu i t e

    o f t e n

    it wound up wi th a dd it io na l a irp la ne s in

    th e

    f l i g h t s .

    C ould you g e t

    th e

    command

    and

    c on t r o l

    t h a t

    he exe rc i s ed

    ove r h i s suppor t ing a i r

    t h a t was d i r e c t l y i n suppor t o f

    -35-

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    41/117

    T A P E II S IDE I

    h im on a mi s s i o n ?

    A N S W E R :

    Yes

    s i r Could

    I

    j u s t

    h o l d

    on it o n e se co n d to

    answer the previous question the ar t i l l e ry

    about well t ha t a l s o I meant about th e ident i f ica t ion

    of the ground troops. They would fly down

    of course

    and m ke these

    I.D.

    passes and

    then

    when the troops on

    the

    ground

    realized

    that

    they

    were

    trying to

    clarify

    the

    si t u at i o n

    they would

    use

    f l a r e s f l a r e

    p i s t o l s to

    clarify their

    position.

    Then from above Col Rudel

    could look

    down

    an d

    he

    could see

    a l l

    the

    l i g h t s

    and

    maybe he c o u ld make o u t

    e x a c t l y

    where

    th e f ron t

    was.

    They would use d i f f er en t colors for

    d i f f e r e n t

    purposes

    and h e would

    know

    exact ly

    al o n g what

    l ine t h e

    f r iend l ies

    a n d

    th e

    e n em i e s

    And

    e v e n apparent ly

    inexper ienced commanders would

    n o r m a l l y b e w arned o f f if they w e r e

    abou t

    to bomb

    on

    some coord ina te s

    t h a t

    w e r e four

    h o u r s

    o ld a n d

    th e

    f r iendly

    t r o o p s

    had

    advanced

    t oo meanwhile. Even

    an in

    experienced

    commander

    normally

    i f they were shooting o ff

    fery

    pis to ls would

    see

    tha t

    he

    w a s n t

    supposed

    to

    bomb

    there.

    I f

    he wasn t too r i g i d then apparently

    they

    would

    l e t him move

    h is coordina tes

    fo rw a rd bomb fo rw a rd .

    Apparently

    tha t was

    an

    inform al arrangement s t r i c t ly

    speaking

    he

    was

    supposed to bomb th e c oo rd in at es . B ut

    6

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    42/117

    T A P E II S I D E I

    a pp are ntly th e system was f l e x i b l e

    enough t o

    allow

    him

    t o

    shift h i s c o o r d i n a t e s

    f o r w a r d .

    The

    remark

    t h a t yo u made about

    giving

    away posi t i ons,

    s i r , by th e l i g h t i n g and by f l a r e s ; he

    c o l . Rudel)

    said

    t h a t the Germans were concerned

    about

    having

    friendly

    o s

    dropped on them and they would constantly l i g h t

    t h e i r own

    p o s i t i o n s t o

    a v o i d t h i s s i t u a t i o n .

    There wa s

    no such th in g as a s e c r e t as to where they were. The

    G e r m a n s

    a l w a y s

    knew w h e r e t h e R u s s i a n s o l d i e r s w e r e a n d

    t h e R u s s i a n s

    always

    knew

    where

    t h e German

    s o l d i e r s were.

    So, it

    was

    not

    a

    problem o f giving

    away

    t h e i r p o s i t i o n s . . .

    it was already known I t wa s more

    important

    to them and

    to t h e i r own s a f e t y t h a t the y i d e n t i f y them selves,

    which they would do c o n s t a n t l y , with

    th e

    Stukoi > so t h a t

    t h e y w o u l d n o t g e t t h e i r ow n b o m b s .

    To

    answer y o u r

    q u e s t i o n

    a b o u t

    t h e

    a r t i l l e r y :

    Th e

    a r t i l l e r y was used only f o r

    s p o t t i n g . They d

    drop a

    s h e l l u n in t e ll ig ib l e ) .

    They

    w o u l d n t

    b e u s e d t o s o f t e n

    u p a n

    a r e a o r t o

    t r y

    t o d e s t r o y

    s o m e

    o f t h e

    R u s s i a n

    u n i t s . .

    s u p p r e s s i o n ?

    T he

    a r t i l l e r y

    d i d n t

    h a v e

    enough

    m u n i t i o n s t o w a s t e

    them t h a t way. N ot

    t h a t

    t h e y d

    b e

    w a s t e d , b u t

    t h e r e w e r e

    o t h e r

    t a r g e t s o f h ig h e r

    p r i o r i t y t h a t

    t h e y . . . ,

    Yo u s e e , t h e y w e r e o p e r a t i n g on

    a

    c o m p l e t e l y d i f f e r e n t

    t o n n a g e s c a l e t h a n t h e U . S .

    d i v i s i o n s .

    A U . S . d i v i s i o n

    g o t such h i g h e r

    a r t i l l e r y tonnages t h a t t h e y

    could a f f o r d

    37

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    43/117

    TAPE

    II S IDE I

    to

    do

    t h a t

    type

    o f

    t h ing .

    There

    was

    very

    little

    mass

    a r t i l l e ry

    anywhere

    on

    the

    Russian f ron t , because they

    were so

    t i g h t

    on

    a r t i l l e r y .

    Our idea

    o f

    a r t i l l e r y

    pre

    para t ion , by th e

    Germans

    was

    r e l a t ive ly

    r a r e .

    CHAIRMAN:

    I

    t h ink we

    can t ake a break

    now.

    I propose , i t * s

    qu a r t e r

    to

    twe l ve r i g h t

    now

    t h a t

    we

    t a k e a f i f t e e n

    minute b reak , r e t u rn

    at

    12 :00 , go fo r

    ano t h e r

    hou r

    and

    t hen a t 1:00 we l l

    ad journ

    fo r lunch-

    This paper t h a t s hopeful ly

    going

    around; if you

    would

    I

    would r ea l ly

    l ike

    you a l l to s ign up with

    your

    address and when

    we h av e some th in g t h a t resembles minutes

    ou t of t h i s ,

    we l l

    send them to

    you

    fo r your in format ion .

    It s

    s t a r t ed

    ou t ,

    it h a s n t

    gone

    too

    f a r .

    So

    if each of

    you would p lea se s ign we l l t r y to

    t ake

    c a re o f

    t h a t

    ad

    ministrative detail

    AFTER BREAK MR. TURNER

    Can

    I

    make

    a po i n t ? The

    comment

    t h a t I

    made abou t

    th e

    j ou rna l i s t ; He

    i s

    a j ou rna l i s t

    by

    background bu t

    t h i s

    repo r t

    i s s tr i c t l y

    fo r

    i n t e rna l

    use

    and

    no t

    fo r

    the

    pres s , fo r

    anybody

    who may be misled by

    t h a t

    comment.

    QUESTION;

    I n te rn a l to

    what?

    Exp la in i n t e r n a l

    ANSWER;

    To t h i s g roup .

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    44/117

    T A P E

    S I D E

    QUESTION

    H e s maki ng t h i s t a p e s o t h a t t h i s g ro u p c a n h e a r

    it?

    A N S W E R :

    N o s o t h a t we c a n p u t o n e r e p o r t t o g e t h e r

    t h a t s

    not biased.

    Q U E S T I O N ;

    T h a t s

    a n

    i n t e r n a l t a p e ?

    A N S W E R :

    Yes.

    Q U E S T I O N :

    C o n t r o l l e d b y y o u ?

    A N S W E R :

    Correct.

    Q U E S T I O N ;

    T h a t s

    g o i n g

    t o

    b e

    u s e d

    t o

    c r o s s

    c h e c k

    t h e

    m i n u t e s .

    A N S W E R ;

    That s correct.

    C H A I R M A N ;

    S p e c i f i c a l l y

    w

    w a n t t o a v o i d an y k i n d o f a n

    i m p l i

    c a t i o n

    t h a t s o u n d s

    like ...

    a n d

    t h a t

    w as

    t h e

    g r o u n d

    r u l e s

    t h a t Tom

    a n d

    h a d t a l k e d a b o u t .

    W e r e

    g o i n g t o l i v e b y

    t h o s e a n d w e d l i k e yo u all t o

    d o

    t h e

    s a m e .

    Now w e r e h av in g l u n ch

    at o n e

    o c l o c k a n d we h a v e

    r e s e r v e d s p a c e s

    f o r

    t w e n t y p e o p l e

    it s

    f l e x i b l e . F o r

    t h o s e w h o w i s h

    t o

    sit

    in

    at l u n c h

    t

    will

    b e

    i n f o r m a l .

    -39-

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    45/117

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    46/117

    TAPE II

    S IDE I

    or as

    f igh ter p i l o t s , it i s n ot p os sib le to do t h i s

    mission. To do close support , the pi lo t s

    have

    to

    be,

    in

    h is

    term,

    in fan t ry

    o f th e

    a i r .

    QUESTION:

    ow

    did Col. Rudel

    manage

    the

    a ir tha t

    was

    support

    ing him indicated that quite often the

    f i r s t

    f l ight

    o f th e day

    was

    th e p erso na l reconna isance of the a rea

    and t hen subsequen tly a i r power was

    applied.

    Did he

    hold

    them from

    th e

    f i e l d s ? Did

    he

    mar sh a l l

    them

    so f a r from

    where he

    was? ow

    d id

    he c a l l

    it

    in ? I s

    he

    a un in t e l li

    g i b l e

    ANSWER:

    The f i r s t pa r t of t h a t ques t ion was t h a t he would

    go

    ou t f i r s t , then

    r e turn to

    th e

    base ,

    because th e

    o the r

    p i l o t s would s leep longer than he would. This was

    a

    before dawn

    f l igh t .

    I t was a reconnaisance f l i gh t before

    dawn. e would re tu rn and the o ther pi lo t s would

    then be

    ready having

    got ten

    up l a t e r than

    he did

    and they would

    t ake

    of f , usual ly in

    group s t r eng th ,

    which was,

    as

    we

    have said before ,

    about

    14 or 15 a i rp lanes . Then he

    would t a k e them

    back

    t o t h e a r e a

    that

    he

    had

    s e l e c t e d

    and

    presumedDly

    b r i e f

    the Air

    Corps

    l eve l

    what

    was

    to

    a t t ack . That would s t a r t

    o ff

    the f igh t ing day. With h is

    normal

    a i r c r a f t s t rength

    being

    36,

    he

    would only

    be

    able

    to

    put

    14-15 a i r c r a f t in th e a i r and ready fo r f l i gh t .

    4

  • 8/9/2019 Col. Rudel 1 - Interview at Anti-Tank Seminar Oct 1976

    47/117

    T A P E S I D E I

    QUESTION:

    Was

    t h e

    r e a s o n f o r

    t h i s b a t t l e damage

    o r was t h i s

    o n e o f t h e i r m a i n t e n a n c e p r o b l e m s ?

    A N S W E R ;

    T h e m a i n

    r e a s o n

    for that w a s m e c h a n i c a l . T h e i r

    problems

    were because an a i r c r a f t

    i s

    a

    v e r y

    t e c h n i c a l

    machine a n d i n

    o r d e r t o

    m a i n t a i n t h a t a i r c r a f t p r o p e r l y

    t h e y

    could only

    g e t a b o u t 1 / 3 o f

    them

    i n

    t h e

    a i r .

    It

    was

    l e s s t h e

    problem t h a t

    t h e y

    had been s h o t

    a t .

    Hal f

    o f

    t h e

    a i r c r a f t were

    s e v e r e l y

    b a t t l e

    damaged.

    He h a s l o c a te d t h e m . .. I n t h e o r y h e h a d 36 a i r p l a n e s

    a v a i l a b l e 27

    on s t r e n g t h

    and

    r e s e r v e . The r e s e r v e s

    were a lway s

    intended t o be

    i n maintenance .

    I n

    f a c t

    he was a b l e t o o n l y p u t up 14 o r 1 5 n o r m a l l y .

    Of

    c o u r s e

    t h e r e were days when h e d go a l o n e ; t h e r e

    was

    o n l y

    one

    a ir p l a n e a v a i l a b le .

    e s a y s it was

    n o t

    s o

    much

    a

    problem

    o f