Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

26
Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger www.cohousing.org.uk

Transcript of Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

Page 1: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6th

2009

Sarah Berger

www.cohousing.org.uk

Page 2: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

What is cohousing?

A way of living consciously as a community-centered neighbourhood, which brings individuals and families together in neighbourly groups to share common aims and activities while also enjoying their own self-contained accommodation and personal space

Page 3: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

Springhill cohousing

Page 4: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

Community Project, UK(former hospital)

Page 5: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

Cohousing communities are based on the following features

➲ Intentionality – set up and run by their members for mutual benefit

➲ Members live consciously as a community

➲ Designed for maximum communal contact

➲ Managed and controlled by their members Size and scale to maximise community dynamics

➲ Common house facilitates shared activities like communal meals

Page 6: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

Common house meal at the Community Project, UK

Page 7: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

History

➲ Started in Denmark in 1960s. Now hundreds in Sweden, Denmark, Netherlands & Belgium

➲ In Europe - a well established way to provide affordable housing within mixed-tenure developments

➲ USA & Canada– 120 exist & 50 more planned

➲ A sprinkling in Japan, New Zealand, Australia and Italy

Page 8: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

Centralwoning senior cohousing, Holland

Page 9: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

Cohousing USA

Page 10: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

2 types of cohousing - intergenerational and senior

➲ Intergenerational cohousing where older

people and families live side by side

➲ A community for people from 50 years and above. They control and manage their own lives together & keep active & healthy for as long as possible

Page 11: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

The Community Project, UK

Page 12: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

Silver Sage, senior cohousing USA

Page 13: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

3 major benefits

➲ Sustainability through shared resources e.g. car pooling, sustainable energy systems and shared shopping

➲ Community through creating a traditional neighbourhood, safe environment and common ownership & values. New opportunities & shared activities e.g. choir, dance club, exercise class, maths coaching, jogging

➲ Affordability – shared facilities mean individual units can be smaller & more affordable

Page 14: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

BenefitsDesigned for blend of privacy and active neighbourliness.

Enables :

➲ Interaction with neighbours- a sense of belonging, identity & accountability are ingredients of the good life

➲ Shared childcare for families and companionship and support for older people

➲ New opportunities & skills exchange, shared activities & shared responsibility

Example: Laughton Lodge has polytunnel club, vegetable club, horse club, dry goods shop, children's summer holiday programme, annual cycle trip to France

Page 15: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

Benefits of the common house

➲ Share meals, have parties, film shows, play readings, band practice, concerts, workshops, exercise classes - and provide benefit to wider community too

➲ May include dining room, play room, tool pool, hall, laundry, music room, games room

➲ Office space – avoids commuting & gives better work-life balance. Facilitates economic & social benefits of business networking

Page 16: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

SpringhillCooking in the common house

Page 17: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

Quotes

“I've got play readings, concerts and films on my doorstep. Above all I love acting in the cabaret”

“The whole family have participated in activities organized by others – walks, cycle rides, camping trips and outings. I could never get them to get off the sofa before we lived here.”

“When I came back with the news (breast cancer diagnosis) within 2 minutes 6 women were in my sitting room opening the brandy. There were offers from people to stay the night, a rota to take me to chemotherapy, a rota for bringing me soup – it was amazing”

Page 18: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

Judging snow sculptures at Laughton

Page 19: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

Cohousing can halve energy use

➲ 60% less energy consumed in home➲ Car-sharing and recycling schemes➲ Communal office spaces, workshops, gym

& social activities reduces travel➲ Lower consumption including energy, land,

goods and waste➲ Average savings:

31% in space 57% in electricity 8% in goods

Page 20: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

References

G Meltzer, Cohousing – A Carbon Reduction Strategy, 2008 CIFA, FindhornJ. Williams, Sun, surf and sustainability—comparison of the cohousing experience in California and the UK, International Planning, Studies Journal 10 (2) (2008)C Durrett, Senior cohousing- A Community Approach to Independent Living, Habitat Press, 2005D. Fromm, Collaborative Communities: Cohousing, Central Living and Other Forms of Housing with Shared Facilities, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1991.

Page 21: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

How cohousing meets policy priorities

Such as in CLG's 'Housing in an Ageing Society Strategy' & 'Communities in Control' & Defra's Framework for pro-environmental Behaviours :

➲ reduction in carbon emissions ➲ active tenant participation➲ empowering communities➲ community cohesion➲ environmental sustainability➲ wellbeing agenda ➲ Public Service Agreements (PSA) targets

Page 22: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

UK Situation➲ 8 established cohousng communities in UK

➲ 30+ groups looking for sites & 50 loose coalitions

➲ Many individuals looking for groups to join

➲ Searching for viable model for mixed tenure or low-cost home ownership

➲ Seeking partnerships with RSLs & developers to pilot mixed tenure cohousing schemes

Page 23: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

Obstacles

Many groups struggling & disband after 3 years Land prices – single biggest barrier Lack of capacity within groups Difficulty in finding Housing Association

partners Planning barriers- exceptions may be needed

or sustainable, low impact, mixed-use resident-led developments

Page 24: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

What is needed ? Support from local authorities & housing sector

➲ Planning policy exceptions for sustainable, low-impact, mixed use, resident-led neighbourhoods like cohousing

➲ identifying land for resident-led initiatives in wider spatial /housing development strategies

➲ promotion of new community-focused neighbourhoods within mainstream housing development models

Page 25: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

What is needed... continued

Social housing grants & development loans

➲Resources for capacity building among cohousing groups

➲Pioneers - developers and RSLs to partner with

Page 26: Cohousing TCPA Roundtable March 6 th 2009 Sarah Berger .

www.cohousing.org.uk