CO2 Geological Storage Site Assessment and Risk … · Schlumberger Private CO2 Geological Storage...
-
Upload
truongthuan -
Category
Documents
-
view
233 -
download
3
Transcript of CO2 Geological Storage Site Assessment and Risk … · Schlumberger Private CO2 Geological Storage...
Schlumberger Private
CO2 Geological Storage Site Assessment and Risk Management
Hanspeter RohnerPromoting CO2 Capture and Storage in RomaniaBucharest12th September 2008
2
Schlumberger Carbon Services
Schlumberger Public
Perfo
rman
ce &
Risk
Ma
nage
ment
Syste
m (P
RMSTM
)
SEVERITY
-11 L
-21 S
-41 C
-31 M
-51 M C
-22 L
-41 S
-62 M
-82 C
-1 02 M C
-33 L
-63 S
-93 M
-1 23 C
-1 53 M C
-44 L
-55 L
-84 S
-1 24 M
-1 64 C
-2 04 M C
- 1 05 S
- 1 55 M
- 2 05 C
- 2 55 M C
-1Lig h t
-2
-3
-4
-5
S e rio u s
M a jo r
C a ta s tro p h ic
M u lti-C a ta s tro p h ic
321
Possible
Unlikely
Improbable
5
Probable
4
Likely
L IK E L IH O O D
W h ite a rro w ind ic a te s d e c re a s in g ris k
P R E V E N TIO N
M IT IG AT IO N
C o n tro lM e a s u re s
R E D
B L U E
Y E L L O WG R E E N
IN T O LE R A B LE : D o n o t t ak e th is ri sk
U N D E S IR A B LE : D em on stra te A LA R P be fo re p ro cee d in g
A C C E P T A B LE : P roc eed ca re fu lly , w it h co n tin uou s im p rove m e nt
N E G LIG IB L E : S a fe to p roc eed
-16 to -1 0
-9 to -5
-4 to -2
-1
B L A C K N O N -O P E R A B LE : E v ac ua te th e z on e a nd or a rea /co un try-25 to -2 0
CO2 Storage Workflow
/ Site PreparationSite Construction Injection
Pre-Operation Phase
~ 10-50 years
~ 2-5 year
Operation Phase
~50-100+years
Post-Injection Phase
Site Retirement Programme(SRP)
Monitoring (M&V)• Operation
• Verification
• Environmental
Site Selection Site Characterization (SCP) Field Design
3
Schlumberger Carbon Services
Schlumberger PublicModelingMeasurement for
Characterization
Construction Technologies& Interventions
Monitoring Measurements
Performance & Risk Management System
Performance & Risk Assessment• Capacity• Injectivity• Containment
• Cost• Environment• Heath & Security• Image• Regulatory compliance
Functions / Stakes
Risk Treatment
Actions
Schlumberger Private
Site Assessment
Site Selection Characterization
A robust site assessment process is a Must for risk minimization throughout a CO2 storage project
5
Schlumberger Carbon Services
Schlumberger Public
Where to Store – Example Continental Europe
World Energy Atlas
Target Storage Formations:
• Depleted oil and gas reservoirs
• EOR and EGR
• Deep saline formations
• Other potential storage areas, i.e. deep unmineable coal
6
Schlumberger Carbon Services
Schlumberger Public
Site Selection Overview
What are the difficulties?
• The lack of sufficient data (particularly in the case of aquifers) • High uncertainties to start with
What do we want to evaluate?
Capacity
The amount of CO2 that can be safely stored in the field
Capacity
The amount of CO2 that can be safely stored in the field
Containment
The ability of the formation to store CO2 safely and permanently
Containment
The ability of the formation to store CO2 safely and permanently
Injectivity
Expresses the ease with which the CO2 can be injected
Injectivity
Expresses the ease with which the CO2 can be injected
Others Criteria
Environment, cost, infrastructure, regulatory, public opinion
Others Criteria
Environment, cost, infrastructure, regulatory, public opinion
7
Schlumberger Carbon Services
Schlumberger Public
Site Selection Methodology
Data CollectionData Review and QC
Pre-characterization studies
Primary Estimation ofthe Performance factors
Site Ranking
Roadmap for Characterization
List of data gap and uncertainties
CharacterizationProgramme Execution
8
Schlumberger Carbon Services
Schlumberger Public
Estimation of the Capacity
• Total Storage Volume Estimation or Structural model
• Available Pore Volume• Petrel Earth Model
9
Schlumberger Carbon Services
Schlumberger Public
Initial Quantitative estimation of Injectivity
• Near well bore model• Simulation with ECLIPSE™• Precipitation of
• NaCl• CaCO3
• CaCl2• pH calculations• Injectivity Assessment over time
1 yearmax 0.71
6 monthsmax 0.20
2 yearsmax 0.81
0 0.8Solid Saturation
1 yearmax 0.711 yearmax 0.71
6 monthsmax 0.20
6 monthsmax 0.20
2 yearsmax 0.812 yearsmax 0.81
0 0.8Solid Saturation
pH
0 6
10
Schlumberger Carbon Services
Schlumberger Public
Preliminary Containment Assessment
Geomechanics
• Collect Analyze existing reports or data
• Preliminary indications of geomechanical behaviors
Geomechanics
• Collect Analyze existing reports or data
• Preliminary indications of geomechanical behaviors
The Caprocks
• Consider Criteria including:• Lithology• Thickness• Continuity • Faults• …
The Caprocks
• Consider Criteria including:• Lithology• Thickness• Continuity • Faults• …
Bounding Faults
• Consider Criteria including:• Presence• Extension• Transmissivity• …
Bounding Faults
• Consider Criteria including:• Presence• Extension• Transmissivity• …
Well integrity
• Consider Criteria including:• Cement Quality• Number of wells• Age of field and wells • …
Well integrity
• Consider Criteria including:• Cement Quality• Number of wells• Age of field and wells • …
Well sketch Cement quality Caprock
13"3/8
9"5/8
7"
12
Schlumberger Carbon Services
Schlumberger Public
Characterization Data AcquisitionGeophysics Geology
Geomechanics
Gamma Ray (GR)
0 (GAPI)200
Micronormal(HMNO)
20 0Microinverse
(HMIN)20 0
Caliper6 (IN) 16 SP-100 (MV) 0
Pad1:200M
RSOZ
DSOZ
RTHALS Deep Resistivity
(HLLD)
1 (OHMM)1000
1 (OHMM)1000
1 (OHMM)10001 (OHMM)1000
HALS Shallow Resistivity
(HLLS)MCFL Rxo
(RX18)
High Resolution Density (RHOZ)
1.95 (G/C3)2.95Neutron Porosity
(NPOR)CrossplotPorosity (PXND)PEF
45 (PU) -1545 (PU) -150 10
1500
1475
Petrophysics/ Mineralogy
Fluid propertiesand mobility
Geomechanics
Well integrity
13
Schlumberger Carbon Services
Schlumberger Public
Surface imaging MappingEM survey interpretationData input
Information managementGIS database
Log interpretationWell correlationSurface identificationSurface/subsurface interaction
Uncertainty analysisUpscaling processesReservoir and Aquifer property population
CalibrationHistory matchPost processingPresentation
Data analysisFacies modellingFault modellingFracture modellingHydrodynamic test analysis
3D flow simulationGeochemistryGeomechanics
Eclipse
3D Geological model3D Property model of the Reservoir and the Overburden
Site Characterization Modeling Workflow
15
Schlumberger Carbon Services
Schlumberger Public
Schlumberger PrivateAbandoned
well
Monitoring well
Injector well
CO2
Fault
Fractures
Caprock
Potable Water
Deep Saline Formation
CO2
Managing Performance and Risk – Integrity of Wells
16
Schlumberger Carbon Services
Schlumberger Public
Well Integrity Management
CharacterisationCement logs
Drilling reportsWell geometry
Cement degradationCasing corrosionCO2 migration
Limit conditions
1
23
4
56
7
8
9
1 0
1 1
1 2
1
23
4
56
7
8
9
1 0
1 1
1 2
1
23
4
56
7
8
9
1 0
1 1
1 2
1
23
4
56
7
8
9
1 0
1 1
1 2
1
23
4
56
7
8
9
1 0
1 1
1 2
1
23
4
56
7
8
9
1 0
1 1
1 2
Data & input
K(t)
1
1110
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
CO2(t)H2O(t)
Dynamic model
Leak amount & probability
>20 M€
<20 M€
<5 M€<1 M€
<0,2 M€
FFinancial
Envir.3rd-PPeople
CSAFETY
6 : Catastr.
5 : Critical
4 : Major3 : Serious
2 : Marginal
1 : Minor
…B
AssetA
Reliability &availability.
Stakes
Level
>20 M€
<20 M€
<5 M€<1 M€
<0,2 M€
FFinancial
Envir.3rd-PPeople
CSAFETY
6 : Catastr.
5 : Critical
4 : Major3 : Serious
2 : Marginal
1 : Minor
…B
AssetA
Reliability &availability.
Stakes
Level
Consequence grid & transfert fonction
Static model
666564636261656555453525154645444342414363534333231326252423222121615141312111654321
DetectionEvolution
Conclusions
811
13
5
00
5
10
15
20
minor weak middle high critical
B = 50
Sensitivity analysisRisk mitigation optionsCost / Benefits ranking
Can we re-use existing wells ?More data needed ?
Probability of leakageType of leakage to expect X
=
An Integrated Solution to:• Leakage and Degradation Modeling• Leakage scenarios• Risk criticality estimation
17
Schlumberger Carbon Services
Schlumberger Public
Conclusions
• A rigorously applied site selection and characterization process is the start to a successful CCS storage project
• A robust Risk Management System assures optimum performance throughout the life of a CO2 storage project (i.e. the example of well integrity management)