CMSS SSCHHOOOOLL IIMMPROOVVEEMMEEN … Improvement Plans 2011/Northeast Zone...5th grade chorus...
Transcript of CMSS SSCHHOOOOLL IIMMPROOVVEEMMEEN … Improvement Plans 2011/Northeast Zone...5th grade chorus...
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
1
CCMMSS SSCCHHOOOOLL IIMMPPRROOVVEEMMEENNTT PPLLAANN RREEPPOORRTT
School: David Cox Road Elementary School
Principal: Dr. Ronald S. Dixon
Address: 4215 David Cox Road
Charlotte, NC 28269
Courier Number: 362
Phone: 980-343-6540
Learning Community: Northeast Learning Zone
Zone Superintendent: Dr. Dawn Robinson
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
2
BELIEFS
Our School has as its first priority the establishment of community.
We respect and value parents as their child’s first and most important teacher.
We value teacher empowerment as they share the leadership work of the school.
We believe literacy to be the first and most essential goal of learning and we define literacy
broadly to include words, numbers, and the arts as the essential tools for all learning.
We believe that students learn best when curriculum is organized around the common
experiences of all cultures and these common themes serve as a tool for integrating content
for deep learning.
We believe that student achievement is best measured using a variety of assessment tools in
addition to standardized assessments.
We support the use of rich resources to make learning come alive for students and we create
opportunities for students to experience learning through fieldtrips and the arts.
We believe it is our responsibility to serve the whole child, acknowledging that a child’s
physical, social, and emotional well-being relates to learning.
We are equally concerned with the ethical and moral aspects of our students and we teach
our students about a common set of character traits through the curriculum, acts of deeds
and service.
We take seriously our roles as teacher leaders, mentors, counselors, and nurses in order to
provide the kind of education worthy of our profession.
MISSION STATEMENT
District: Maximize academic achievement by every student in every school.
School: All children who attend David Cox Road Elementary School are empowered through a partnership of nurturing, caring adults
to become confident and resourceful life-long learners with a focus on rigor and high academic expectations.
VISION
We work towards a school where David
Cox children are attending in a safe,
nurturing place that is the center of our
learning community. Our school will allow
all children to master the skills essential for
success in life. Parents and community
members will actively participate in the life
of the school and feel welcomed. Our
professional learning community will
evolve by adapting the facilities, staff and
resources necessary to meet the changing
needs of our students and community.
SMART GOALS
SNMART GOAL 1: To increase literacy/reading proficiency rates by 10% on the EOG tests and meet overall high growth targets (grades 4-5); by 10% in grade 3
and with an overall 90% readiness for the next grade level in grades K-2.
SMART GOAL 2: To increase math proficiency rates by 10% on the EOG tests and meet overall high growth targets (grades 4-5); by 10% in grade 3 and with an
overall 90% readiness for the next grade level in grades K-2.
SMART GOAL 3 : To improve the overall school culture in ways that will foster the needed academic growth. Student survey respondents
will show 5% growth from pre/post school -based survey (10 questions).
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
3
ASSSESSMENT DATA SNAPSHOT
David Cox Road Elementary - 600362
School Composite
2008-2009 School Year 2009-2010 School Year 2010-2011 School Year 2011-2012 School Year (Target)
Subgroup Perf.
Composite Avg.
Growth AYP
Reading AYP Math
Perf. Composite
Avg. Growth
AYP Reading
AYP Math
Perf. Composite
Avg. Growth
AYP Reading
AYP Math
Perf. Composite
Avg. Growth
AYP Reading
AYP Math
African-American
55.1 -0.03 Met Met 58.0 0.053 Met Not Met
59.3 -0.07 Not Met
Not Met
70 Meet Meet
Asian 89.4 0.208
Insuf Data
Insuf Data
68.4 0.055 Insuf Data
Insuf Data
76.7 0.070 Insuf Data
Insuf Data
87 n/a n/a
Hispanic 54.8 0.094 Met Met 62.0 -0.02 Met Met 54.5 0.000
Not Met
Not Met
65 Meet Meet
Multi-Racial 77.6 0.046
Insuf Data
Insuf Data
80.6 0.084 Insuf Data
Insuf Data
75.0 0.098 Insuf Data
Insuf Data
85 n/a n/a
Native American
55.6 0.213 Insuf Data
Insuf Data
71.4 0.478 Insuf Data
Insuf Data
100.0 0.369 Insuf Data
Insuf Data
100 n/a n/a
White 87.4 0.116 Met Met 84.4 0.143 Met Met 75.8 -0.02 Met Met 85 Meet Meet
LEP 66.0 0.148 Met Met 53.7 -0.09
Insuf Data
Insuf Data
54.1 0.005 Not Met
Not Met
65 Meet Meet
SWD 38.0 -0.23
Insuf Data
Insuf Data
35.3 -0.07 Met Not Met
28.4 -0.15 Insuf Data
Insuf Data
39 n/a n/a
ED 51.6 -0.00 Met Met 55.3 -0.00 Met Met 56.1 -0.07
Not Met
Not Met
66 Meet Meet
EOG Total 65.7 0.035 Met Met 64.6 0.070 Met
Not Met
63.0 -0.04 Not Met
Not Met
73 --- ---
EOC Total ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n/a --- ---
School
Composite 65.7 0.035 Met Met 64.6 0.070 Met
Not Met
63.0 -0.04 Not Met
Not Met
73 --- ---
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
4
Charlotte-Mecklenburg School Quality Review School Self-Evaluation Form
Name of principal: Ronald Dixon
Name of school: David Cox Elementary #362
Please complete with as much detail as you can, use the completion as a professional development exercise if appropriate and send it to your lead reviewer (electronically) two weeks before the review.
Completing this form will help you prepare for some of the discussions which will take place both before and during the review. It will also help the review team get to know you and your school and to understand how well the school community knows itself. Guidance on completing the form:
Please be evaluative, rather than descriptive, and make your focus outcomes for students.
Include references to where the evidence of your self-evaluation can be found, e.g.,"excellent boys’ results in state math tests as shown in annual report to the state”, “parents’ questionnaires from 2006”.
Be concise; (for example, use bullet points or note form).
Aim to confine your response to no more than eight pages.
Please place an X against the grade (1-4), which most accurately reflects your judgment of overall quality in response to the questions.
You are advised to complete section B last. This section is summative and draws on your evaluations elsewhere in the self-evaluation report.
Please omit sections where you feel that you are not in a position to respond. How should evaluations be made?
You are strongly encouraged to refer to the Quality Criteria, sub-criteria and rubrics and as you complete the evaluations. These are included within the Notes of Guidance for the School Quality Review and should be kept close at hand as you complete the evaluations.
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
5
What approach should we take? Schools have adopted different approaches. In some schools the principal and the leadership team have completed the form as a part of one of their regular meetings. Other schools have devoted part of a faculty meeting as a way of involving all members of staff; this is highly recommended as a means of engaging the whole staff, helping them to prepare for the review and gathering evidence which reflects the work of the whole school. Whichever approach you adopt, we recommend that you do not make this an onerous task but that you take the opportunity to stop, reflect and record your immediate perceptions.
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
6
School Profile (as of 9/30/11)
School name and number: David Cox Road Elementary School address: 4215 David Cox Road, Charlotte, NC 28269 School telephone number: 980-343-6540
N Note: We have 2 Pre-K classes (32 students) not reflected below!
#
%
Grades: PK-5
Number of students enrolled: 877 (+32 PK students) Total: 909
Number of general education students: 803 91.6%
Number of EC students: 66 7.5%
Number of LEP students: 64 7.3%
Principal suspensions:
Superintendent suspensions:
Percentage of students eligible for Free or Reduced-Price Lunch:
517 59% (est.)
Ethnic make-up of the students (by percentage): African-American
Hispanic Multi-Racial
White Asian
American Indian
69.0% 11.5% 3.5 % 10.5% 4.4%
1.0 %
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
7
The following self evaluation is a collection of SEFs that were done by vertical teams at David Cox Elementary. Each team was asked to work through the evaluation and then the School Improvement Team analyzed the information and created the school improvement plan.
A. What is distinctive about your school?
David Cox’s school climate is friendly and family oriented. We have had the flexibility to integrate across the curriculum so that there is cohesion in instruction. Our school incorporates vertical team planning, a Family Flex Model, and team Village Meetings to meet the needs of our changing population. The staff is working on year-long professional development about children in poverty and meeting the needs of minority students.
Students: Our students are provided with many activities that enhance the whole child:
5th grade chorus –International Dancers-Math Olympiad-Science Olympiad-Chess Club-Girls on the Run-
monthly cultural arts programs-on and off campus field trips
Staff: Our staff turnover rate is extremely low. We are a collaborative staff that wants to teach the whole child. We have many teachers who have post graduate degrees, as well as National Board Certification. Several teachers are current or past members of Charlotte Teachers' Institute, as well as Professional Development Mentor Teachers. Staff professional development is done onsite for teachers and Instructional Assistants (IA’s). Our IA’s, EC, and TD teachers use the push-in model to assist in meeting the needs of all students.
Community: We incorporate many activities that involve the students, families, and community. A local church supplies our children with a clothes closet and onsite food pantry. Our FIN Club (Friends in the Neighborhood) provides community volunteers to assist students with social and academic skills. Our PTA holds many special activities to bring families together. We also have a strong partnership with UNCC through the Professional Development School. David Cox trains 12 student teachers at our campus each year. The students are supervised by DC teachers through a Project Supervisor program. Monthly seminars are held on campus to prepare student teachers for the classroom.
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
8
B How effective is your school overall?
4 3 2 1
School Self-Evaluation: High quality (4) 2.5 Undeveloped (1)
How do you know?
The DC staff remains focused on student learning by aligning instruction with the NCSCOS and the CCS.
PLC's work collaboratively to create common assessments to meet the individual needs of students.
DC has several committees to assist in meeting the goals of the SIP and creating quality instruction.
We are currently using the family flex model for math and reading in grades 1st-5th where the Instructional Assistants push into classrooms to assist with small groups.
A school-wide behavior plan has been implemented-ICMM
Use of the Dolphin Store as an incentive plan for students to go above and beyond expected behavior.
Accelerated Reader 1st-5th
What are its notable strengths?
strong PTA
sense of community
focus on ALL students
high level of community involvement
onsite professional development for teachers and IA’s
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
9
What are its main areas for improvement?
Increase proficiency rates
Achievement Gap among subgroups, including poverty
Technology
More parent involvement
Effective planning time
1. How effective is your school in ensuring high quality achievement for students in all grades, especially in the core subjects?
4 3 2 1
School Self-Evaluation: High quality (4) x Undeveloped (1)
How do you know?
EOG
Reading 3D and DIBELS
Common assessments/assignments
Family Flex observations (progress monitoring individual students)
In which subjects and grades do students do best, and why?
5th grade historically continues to outscore the other grade levels in EOG scores. Math scores tend to be overall 5-10% higher than reading scores. 70% of the 3rd grade teachers in 2010-2011 had significantly higher math scores than reading scores. In which subjects and grades is improvement needed, and what action is being taken?
Both Reading and Math EOG scores need to improve. Our School Improvement Plan, goal 1 and 2, state improvement in both EOG areas, as well as increasing readiness in grades k-2.
The Family Flex model has been implemented to assist in meeting the needs of students in both reading and math.
IA’s are working in the classrooms to assist teachers with instruction.
A reading specialist assists 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade “bubble” students to increase reading skills.
Bi-weekly Village Meetings take place to look at data from coming assessments, CMS
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
10
formatives, and common assignments.
A master Instructional schedule has been put in place to maximize instructional time.
Extended day funds will be used to tutor before/after school.
Is there evidence of disparities in student achievement by subgroups? If so, what action is being taken?
There continues to be a gap in minority achievement. Action: Flex model/professional development on working with diverse populations
There was a decrease in reading and math scores in the Hispanic population in 5th grade. Action: The ESL teacher will plan with the classroom teacher and practice the inclusive model.
How is the school addressing the specialized needs of EC and LEP students?
The support team, via the school’s PLC vision, collaborate with the classroom teachers to provide student and teacher support. They also co-plan and co-teach along side of classroom teachers. The school follows an Inclusive Service Delivery Model where we cluster EC students (according to IEPs) and LEP students so that we can put appropriate personnel to provide student support inside of the general classroom. The support team also ensures proper accommodations and modifications are in place in the classroom and in testing.
How does the school use student performance data to take and adjust actions to improve student achievement?
The PLC model allows for the creation of common assessments. During Village Meetings and team planning, teams come together, look at data and begin to make data driven instructional decisions to meet the needs of all students. The teams practice the Family Flex model where students' needs are met through small group, focused instruction. Students are able to move in and out of groups based on their needs.
How does your school allocate available resources to improve student learning and achievement?
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
11
The SLT and committees, along with administration and grade level teams look at budgets, personnel, scheduling and the allocation of resources to support the classrooms. SLT helped determine the allocation of teacher assistants across the school, and committees have helped distribute funds from school and PTA accounts to support classroom needs.
2. How effective is your school in providing a relevant and appropriate curriculum for all students, grades and sub-groups?
4 3 2 1
School Self-Evaluation: High quality (4) x Undeveloped (1)
How do you know?
Teams use the NCSCOS and the CCS to ensure alignment.
The teams chose essential standards and created year-long plans in all subject areas.
PLC's are using common assessments, district formatives, and common plans to create engaging, differentiated instruction.
Inclusive practices for EC, TD, and ELL students
How is alignment with the NCSCOS/CCS ensured?
PLC planning
Year-long plans
CMS pacing guides
Curriculum integration in connect classes
Pre and post assessments
How does the school ensure a broad range of learning experiences?
Family Flex model-book studies -technology integration-Discovery Education – Hands-on Science experiences– Variety of teaching strategies – Differentiation – Field trips (locally and overnight) – Integration of cultural arts performances –Community partnerships – Mentor program (FIN Club)-Read Across America tutors-UNCC student tutor partnership in all subject areas
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
12
3. How effective is the quality of teaching and instruction in ensuring high quality learning, progress and achievement?
4 3 2 1
School Self-Evaluation: High quality (4) x Undeveloped (1)
How do you know?
Pre/Post Assessment scores show growth on essential standards
Using data driven instruction
Sharing data in bi-weekly Village Meetings
Family Flex model in math and reading
Reading 3D, DIBELS, Accelerated Reader
Use of Guided Reading and Math
Use of small group, workshop based instruction in math Which are the strongest features of teaching and learning and why?
Using progress monitoring programs to find strengths and areas of improvement for students
Use of common assessment data to plan Family Flex model
Committees focused on ways to improve instruction What aspects of teaching and learning most need improvement and what action is being taken?
Improve differentiation in the classroom Action: using common assessment data to meet student needs
Accountability and academic focused team planning Action: teams created a common mission, norms and expectations
More focus on rigor and teacher expectations Action: Professional development and facilitator support in designing more lessons with rigor, and increasing teacher awareness
Supporting students who perform below a 3 on EOG tests Action: Implementation of PEPs with quality and fidelity.
The amount of testing required is excessive and takes away from instructional time Action: creating a new testing schedule to reduce instructional interruptions.
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
13
How do teachers assess students’ achievement of learning objectives and adjust instruction with assessment information?
Pre/post assessments, common assessments and assignments, and district assessments
Bi-weekly Village Meetings to discuss grade level data
Use of Family Flex model where students are grouped by need and "flexed" in and out as needed.
Guided Reading and Math focuses on specific objectives based on a student's needs
Use of Study Island, Accelerated Reader, Reading 3D
4. How effective is the school in ensuring high quality leadership and management?
4 3 2 1
School Self-Evaluation:
High quality (4) x Undeveloped (1)
How do you know?
We are in a transitional stage with new leadership. As leadership continues to be more positive and empowers teachers, effectiveness will increase. Which are the strongest aspects and why?
Instructional leaders facilitate change in a positive way for staff, grade levels, and individuals.
Clear weekly memo
Administrative team is visible
Committees of vertical teams to help make decisions
Systems are in place to better hold staff members accountable
What most needs improvement and what action is being taken?
Continued focus on communication to/with staff on decisions and committees
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
14
Action: Weekly memos, staff meeting, emails
A feeling of trust amongst all groups (A-team, teachers, IA's, support)
Increased teacher empowerment Action: Administration has been open to feedback provided by the staff, FAC
A better understanding of elementary curriculum
5. How effective is the school in creating a high quality learning environment?
4 3 2 1
School Self-Evaluation: High quality (4) x Undeveloped (1)
How do you know?
Peer and Administrative observations and walk-throughs Parent/Student Surveys ICMM school-wide behavior plan
Which are the strongest aspects and why?
Teachers use data to create and implement the Family Flex model
Common instructional schedule to maximize IA support in the classroom
IA's are used to assist with instruction
Strong academic facilitators
Strong community partnerships to support academic and social needs-UNCC, UCUMC, Read Across America, FIN club
What most needs improvement and what action is being taken?
More professional Development to meet the needs of our changing population-Action: book studies, Poverty Simulation workshop
Increased character development
More technology Action: PTA fundraising, IYC
Increase rigor Action:TD teacher working with all teachers, not only inclusion classes
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
15
Increased decision making by the teachers
Planning needs to be catered to individual students in a classroom. There should be common objectives, but different approaches. Action: Leadership is having open conversations with teams during planning to discuss best practices for lesson plans.
6. How effective is the school in establishing a high quality partnership with parents, other schools and the community?
4 3 2 1
School Self-Evaluation: High quality (4) x Undeveloped (1)
How do you know?
Strong community partnerships with UCUMC, UNCC, local businesses
FIN Mentoring Club
Monthly movie nights
PTA involvement
Strong family showing for school activities Which are the strongest features of communication between home/school about the school’s work and about each student’s achievement? Why?
Parent Assist – Report Cards – Newsletters – Email – Dolphin News – ConnectEd phone calls – parent conferences
The level of communication between school and parents is strong in many ways. Teachers and parents are encouraged to talk before making decisions and/or getting administration involved. What most needs improvement and what action is being taken?
Increasing students’ involvement in programs in the school – working with the connect teachers to integrate performances and curriculum
Giving back to partnerships - generating a system to give back/thank the business partnerships
Diversity in leadership – increased recruiting of minority members on SLT and PTA executive board
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
16
What aspects of the school’s work to involve parents/guardians and the community in the life of the school work best? Why?
The PTA – continues to be a strong support both volunteer and funding sources for the school
Mentors and Community Partners – 60+ volunteers taking on mentor roles in the school for students
Many events on the school calendar that bring parents into the school – Donuts with Dads, Volunteer Breakfast, Dad/Mom Dance, Math Night, Parent Workshops/
Parent University
FIN (Friends in the Neighborhood) mentoring program brings in many community volunteers to work with students
Professional Development School with UNCC-grant monies are allotted to our school through this partnership to better serve our staff and students
What needs improvement and what action is being taken?
More room parents Action: PTA board is working on recruiting and electronic forms of communication
Reaching out to minorities to reflect the population in leadership roles –
7. What other information, if any, do you feel it would be important for the reviewers to know prior to the review? (For example: principal recently appointed previous month)
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
17
New leadership after nine years
Three administrative changes made in 12 months The staff feels K-2 data is equally important in the overall success of the school.
SCHOOL PROFILE
David Cox Road Elementary School (DCRES) is a large school near the University Area of Charlotte. The school
was opened in 1994 and is now Pre-Kindergarten through Grade 5. DCRES initially opened as a pilot school for
the Carnegie Foundation project, The Basic School. The philosophy follows the C’s: Community, Climate for
Learning, Curriculum and Character Education. The school works closely with the University of North Carolina at
Charlotte as partners in professional development for students, teachers and staff.
The staff at DCRES consists of 56 certified teachers and 15 instructional assistants: 100% with clear licensure,
34% advanced degrees, 25% national board certified, 83% 4+ years teaching and an average teaching experience of
12.2 years. The school has a total enrollment of 877 K-5 students (with an additional 30 PK students),
approximately 60% free and reduced lunch, 10.5% white, 69% African-American, and 11.5% Hispanic.
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
18
In 2010-2011, DCRES was designated as a School of No Recognition, did not make AYP (met 15 of 25
targets) and did not improve proficiency rates.
In 2009-2010, DCRES made expected growth, did not improve proficiency rates, and did not make AYP (24
out of 27 targets).
In 2008-09, DCRES made both expected growth according to the NC ABC’s and AYP, according to No
Child Left Behind.
In 2007-2008, DCRES was recognized as a school of progress, making expected growth, but did not make
AYP.
In 2006-2007, DCRES was not recognized by the State Accountability Program (making expected growth in
math and not reading) and did not make AYP status.
SMART GOAL (1): To increase literacy/reading proficiency rates by 10% of the EOG tests and meet overall high
growth targets (grades 4-5); by 10% in grade 3 and with an overall 90% readiness for the next grade level in
grades K Data Used: EOG scores – Dibels EOY scores SP 2014 Tactic: Focus 1: Effective Teaching and Leadership and Focus 3: Increasing the Graduation Rate
Strategies (determined by what data)
Task
Task
Task (PD)
Point Person (title/name)
Evidence of Success (Student Impact)
Funding (estimated cost and source)
Personnel Involved
Timeline Start–End
Interim Check Dates
1. Utilize grade level TEAM
planning/PLC times to plan quality
“literacy” instruction that includes a
balanced literacy program with
Administrators Facilitators
K-2 students will show 10% gain in proficiency on year-end Dibels testing 3-5 grade students will show 10% gain in proficiency on EOG Reading test
Staff retreat training $800 School
Staff
8/15-6/10
End of quarter checks Oct. 24 Jan 16 Mar 26 May 29
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
19
Word Work, Shared Reading,
Independent Reading and Writing
and that also incorporates
supplemental research-proven
literacy strategies.
Use facilitators and administrators to attend and monitor grade team meetings
Review lesson plans
Train staff on literacy strategies
funds
2. Develop and utilize frequent grade level
literacy based common assessments that
will be used to monitor learning and to
create more strategic differentiated
instruction
Use facilitators to train staff on developing quality common assessments
Use teachers to develop differentiated lessons based on results
Facilitators Teachers
K-2 students will show 10% gain in proficiency on year-end Dibels testing 3-5 grade students will show 10% gain in proficiency on EOG Reading test
Ongoing training No cost
Staff
8/15-6/10
End of quarter checks Oct. 24 Jan 16 Mar 26 May 29
3. Utilize a grade level family FLEX model
that focuses on instructional assistants
pushing into the classroom and
differentiated instruction based on student
mastery levels and results of ongoing
assessments. Develop master schedule for FLEX
Develop master schedule for
Facilitators Teachers
K-2 students will show 10% gain in proficiency on year-end Dibels testing 3-5 grade students will show 10% gain in proficiency on EOG Reading test
Ongoing training No cost
Staff
8/15-6/10
End of quarter checks Oct. 24 Jan 16 Mar 26 May 29
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
20
assistants
Teachers to develop differentiated lesson plans for FLEX
Train staff on Family FLEX model
4. Use Accelerated Reader school-wide and
monitor student progress more
strategically. Train new staff on AR usage
Include AR time in master schedule
Monitor each teacher’s adherence to AR guidelines
AR Staff Committee
K-2 students will show 10% gain in proficiency on year-end Dibels testing 3-5 grade students will show 10% gain in proficiency on EOG Reading test
Ongoing training No cost
Staff
8/15-6/10
End of quarter checks Oct. 24 Jan 16 Mar 26 May 29
5. Implement plan to focus more
strategically on students on the “bubble” of
being proficient as a means to increase
overall percentage of students performing
on grade level in literacy/reading.
AP to develop plan as part of AP
project
AP to give quarterly updates on
each student’s tracking towards
proficiency
Mitchell/AP
K-2 students will show 10% gain in proficiency on year-end Dibels testing 3-5 grade students will show 10% gain in proficiency on EOG Reading test
Ongoing training No cost
Staff
8/15-6/10
End of quarter checks Oct. 24 Jan 16 Mar 26 May 29
6. Provide professional development
geared towards strengthening instructional
rigor and meaningful differentiation in
Principal Facilitators
K-2 students will show 10% gain in proficiency on year-end Dibels testing
Ongoing training
Staff
8/15-6/10
End of quarter checks Oct. 24
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
21
literacy.
develop PD plan for year
monitor PD plan for effectiveness
3-5 grade students will show 10% gain in proficiency on EOG Reading test
No cost Jan 16 Mar 26 May 29
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
22
SMART GOAL (2): To increase math proficiency rates by 10% of the EOG tests and meet overall high growth
targets (grades 4-5), by 10% in grade 3 and with an overall 90% readiness for the next grade level in
grades K-2. Data Used: EOG scores – K-2 Math grade level readiness SP 2014 Tactic: Focus 1: Effective Teaching and Leadership and Focus 3: Increasing the Graduation Rate
Strategies (determined by what data)
Task
Task
Task (PD)
Point Person (title/name)
Evidence of Success (Student Impact)
Funding (estimated cost and source)
Personnel involved
Timeline Start–End
Interim Check Dates
1. Utilize grade level TEAM planning/PLC
times to plan quality “math” instruction
that includes multiple problem-solving
strategies, fact fluency, writing and
technology and that also includes
supplemental research-proven math
strategies.
Use facilitators and administrators to attend and monitor grade team meetings
Review lesson plans
Train staff on literacy strategies
Facilitators Teachers
K-2 students will show 10% gain in proficiency on year-end math readiness testing 3-5 grade students will show 10% gain in proficiency on EOG Math test
Ongoing training No cost
Staff
8/15-6/10
End of quarter checks Oct. 24 Jan 16 Mar 26 May 29
2. Develop and utilize frequent grade
level math common assessments
that will be used to monitor
learning and to create more
strategic differentiated instruction.
Facilitators Teachers
K-2 students will show 10% gain in proficiency on year-end math readiness testing 3-5 grade students will show 10% gain in proficiency on EOG
Ongoing training No cost
Staff
8/15-6/10
End of quarter checks Oct. 24 Jan 16 Mar 26
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
23
Use facilitators to train staff on
developing quality common assessments
Use teachers to develop differentiated lessons based on results
Math test May 29
3. Utilize a grade level family FLEX
model that focuses on instructional
assistants pushing into the
classroom and differentiated
instruction based on student
mastery levels and results of
ongoing assessments.
Develop master schedule for FLEX
Develop master schedule for assistants
Teachers to develop differentiated lesson plans for FLEX
Train staff on Family FLEX model
Facilitators
K-2 students will show 10% gain in proficiency on year-end math readiness testing 3-5 grade students will show 10% gain in proficiency on EOG Math test
Ongoing training No cost
Staff
8/15-6/10
End of quarter checks Oct. 24 Jan 16 Mar 26 May 29
4. Implement plan to focus more
strategically on students on the
“bubble” of being proficient AND
students in AYP subgroups as a
means to increase overall
percentage of students performing
Nix - Dean of Students
K-2 students will show 10% gain in proficiency on year-end math readiness testing 3-5 grade students will show 10% gain in proficiency on EOG Math test
Ongoing training No cost
Staff
8/15-6/10
End of quarter checks Oct. 24 Jan 16 Mar 26 May 29
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
24
on grade level in math.
Dean of Students to develop plan as
part of AP project
Dean of Students to give quarterly
updates on each student’s tracking
towards proficiency
5. Provide professional development
geared towards strengthening instructional
rigor and meaningful differentiation in
math.
develop PD plan for year
monitor PD plan for effectiveness
Principal Facilitators
K-2 students will show 10% gain in proficiency on year-end math readiness testing 3-5 grade students will show 10% gain in proficiency on EOG Math test
Ongoing training No cost
Staff
8/15-6/10
End of quarter checks Oct. 24 Jan 16 Mar 26 May 29
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
25
SMART GOAL (3): To improve the overall school culture in ways that will foster the needed academic growth.
Student survey respondents will show 5% growth from pre/post school -based survey (10 questions).
Data Used: 2011 CMS Student Survey SP 2014 Tactic: Focus 3: Increasing the Graduation Rate (3D)
Strategies (determined by what data)
Task
Task
Task (PD)
Point Person (title/name)
Evidence of Success (Student Impact)
Funding (estimated cost and source)
Personnel involved
Timeline Start–End
Interim Check Dates
1. Develop and implement a school-wide
student behavior plan (ICMM – I Can
Manage Myself) and use a staff committee
to monitor effectiveness and needed
modifications.
Use principal to develop DRAFT Plan
Staff committee reviews and finalizes DRAFT plan
Staff committee monitors plan’s effectiveness
Principal ICMM Staff Committee
Student survey
respondents will show
5% growth from
pre/post school-based
survey (10 questions).
Overall decrease in office referrals from beginning to end of year
Ongoing training No cost
Staff
8/15-6/10
End of quarter checks Oct. 24 Jan 16 Mar 26 May 29
2. Use grade level TEAM planning/PLC
times to monitor the effectiveness of the
ICMM student behavior plan
Use principal to develop DRAFT Plan
Staff committee reviews and finalizes
Principal ICMM Staff Committee
Student survey
respondents will show
5% growth from
pre/post school-based
survey (10 questions).
Ongoing training No cost
Staff
8/15-6/10
End of quarter checks Oct. 24 Jan 16 Mar 26 May 29
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
26
DRAFT plan
Staff committee monitors plan’s effectiveness
Overall decrease in office referrals from beginning to end of year
3. Provide staff with professional
development/activities geared towards
meeting the needs of our changing student
population (i.e. Poverty Simulation, books
studies, bus ride through neighborhoods,
etc…)
develop PD plan for year
monitor PD plan for effectiveness
Principal Facilitators
Student survey
respondents will show
5% growth from
pre/post school-based
survey (10 questions).
Overall decrease in office referrals from beginning to end of year
Ongoing training No cost
Staff Approx: $3,000 School funds PDS funds
8/15-6/10
End of quarter checks Oct. 24 Jan 16 Mar 26 May 29
4. Implement a school-wide Dolphin Dollar
store which requires students to earn
school dollars for actions that go “over and
beyond” (Character education).
Dean of Students
Overall increase in student usage from beginning to end of year
$1,000 School, PTA and partnership funds
Staff Students
8/15-6/10
End of quarter checks Oct. 24 Jan 16 Mar 26 May 29
5. Develop/implement school-based
student and family spirit activities to foster
more family involvement.
Staff on PTA and SLT
Increased parent participation from beginning to end of year
Approx. $5,000 PTA funding
Staff Students Families PTA
8/15-6/10
End of quarter checks Oct. 24 Jan 16 Mar 26 May 29
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
29
School: David Cox Road Elementary School
Ronald S. Dixon – Principal Date: September 2011
AYP – 2011 (6 subgroups: All Students – Black – Hispanic – White – ECON DISADV - LEP)
No subgroups for: Amer. Indian – Asian – Multi-Racial – SWD (EC)
TARGET
ALL
STUDENTS BLACK HISPANIC WHITE
ECON.
DISADV LEP
Math
Participation Met Met Met Met Met Met
Math
Proficiency Not Met Not Met Not Met Met Not Met
Not
Met
OAI
Attendance Met
Reading
Participation Met Met Met Met Met Met
Reading
Proficiency Not Met Not Met Not Met Met Not Met
Not
Met
SUMMARY - MET 15 OUT OF 25 Targets (60%)
Identified targets/areas for growth as determined by the EOG data:
ALL
Black
Hispanic
Economically Disadvantaged
LEP
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
30
Strategies:
School Improvement Plan GOAL 2:
To increase math proficiency rates by 10% of the EOG tests and meet overall high growth targets.
1. Utilize grade level TEAM planning/PLC times to plan quality “math” instruction that includes multiple problem-solving
strategies, fact fluency, writing and technology and that also includes supplemental research-proven math strategies.
2. Develop and utilize frequent grade level math common assessments that will be used to monitor learning and to create more
strategic differentiated instruction.
3. Utilize a grade level family FLEX model that focuses on instructional assistants pushing into the classroom and differentiated
instruction based on student mastery levels and results of ongoing assessments.
4. Implement plan to focus more strategically on students on the “bubble” of being proficient AND students in the AYP
subgroups as a means to increase overall percentage of students performing on grade level in math.
5. Provide professional development geared towards strengthening instructional rigor and meaningful differentiation in math.
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
31
School-Based Management and Accountability Program
Summary of School-Based Waiver Requests for 2011-2012
LEA: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools LEA code: 600
School Codes
Request for Waivers
362 – David Cox Road
Elementary School
Please enter codes of all schools
requesting the waiver described
on this form.
1. Insert the waivers you are requesting.
Maximum Teaching Load and Maximum Class Size (grades 4-12)
2. Please identify the law, regulation or policy from which you are seeking an
exemption.
115C-301 (c and d) Maximum Teaching Load and Maximum Class Size
3. Please state how the waiver will be used.
Class size will be adjusted to address student individual instructional needs
through flexible grouping of students in the most effective utilization of teaching
teams. Maximum teaching load will be used to allow teachers in specific areas of
the curriculum to teach students designated for specific skill needs and to address
the large number of students requesting elective classes.
4. Please state how the waiver will promote achievement of performance goals.
This waiver will allow more flexibility in grouping students to meet their
abilities and needs and thus should enhance their achievement on the performance
goals.
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
32
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
33
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
27
Bullying Prevention Outcome: To improve the overall school culture in ways that will foster the needed academic growth.
Student survey respondents will show 5% growth from pre/post school-based survey (10 questions).
Strategies/Rationale
Task
Point Person
Evidence of Success Names of Participants
(Add names to titles where appropriate)
Information related to task as indicated
Timeline
Outcome Measures
1. Conduct Staff Training/Present BP
Plan to staff:
Plan staff training
Conduct staff training
BP Liaison (Lis)
Staff will have an understanding of school’s anti-bullying plan.
Staff
Principal and AP will receive training. BP Liaison will attend a CMS group training.
October 2011
2. Present plan to SLT:
BP Liaison will present info and policy to SLT
BP Liaison (Lis)
SLT will have an understanding of school’s BP efforts and expectations.
SLT members
BP Liaison will attend a CMS group training.
October 2011
3. Establish a BP taskforce
A taskforce is created to assist in the implementation and communication of the BP plan.
Principal BP Liaison (Lis)
A taskforce representing all stakeholders establishes clear objectives as indicated by Safety and Respect for All district plan.
Task Force: Principal BP Liaison SLT Staff SLT – Parents Safety Patrol Students Counselor
BP liaison will be provided with information on how to work with taskforce to promote and implement BP Plan.
October 2011
4. Share plan with students and
parents:
Teachers will share BP Plan with students and parents at curriculum night
Teachers
Parents and students will have an understanding of expectations and BP efforts and discipline management at the school.
Teachers Students Parents
Teachers will share information with students and parents.
November
2011
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
28
5. Implement school-wide BP
activities with students (including Every Monday Matters…).
CONNECT teachers will work with grade teams to develop BP activities for each quarter
BP Liaison
CONNECT teachers will develop and implement grade level appropriate BP activities with students.
CONNECT Teachers Students
Students will complete BP grade level activities in CONNECT classes.
Ongoing
throughout school year
6. Train designated 5
th grade
students as Peer Mediators
Line up training with R. McCarter
Implement training
Psychologist – Rob McCarter
5
th Grade Peer Mediators will
be trained to assist in helping students in conflict.
Psychologist
5
th Grade Peer
Mediators will be trained to assist in helping students in conflict
Training to be completed 1
st
Quarter 2011
Students
used as peer mediators
2nd
4th
quarters
CMS School Improvement Plan 2010-12
<David Cox Road Elementary School> 2011-12
SMART: S – Specific; M – Measurable; A – Attainable; R – Realistic; T – Time-bound.
34