Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85%...

26
Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment

Transcript of Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85%...

Page 1: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment

Page 2: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

Agenda

• Original Equipment Manufacturers’ (OEMs’) connectivity needs

• Enabling infrastructure

• How we make it happen

Page 3: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

CV 101a

Connected Vehicles ≠ SPaT*

Connected & Autonomous Vehicles

Efficiency Applications

Eco-Signal Arrival & Departure

GlidePath (GLOSA)

Engine Stop/StartMobility Applications

Safety Applications

Connected Vehicles

SPaT message

*SPaT = Signal Phase and Timing, as defined in SAE J2735

Page 4: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

How we (the transpo. folks) think

Page 5: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

How OEM’s think

Page 6: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

Comparison of mindsets

“Us” “Them”

Local development Large-scale deployment

Wants all vehicle manufacturers Wants nationwide deployment & consistency

Average operations are M-Fr Systems have high availability, 24/7

An 18 month project is a “short” timeframe

Develops and deploys software in a matter of weeks

Develops and implements projects Provides solutions, not necessarily wholly owned by OEMs

Page 7: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

The problem

Page 8: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

Agenda

• OEMs connectivity needs

• Enabling infrastructure

• How we make it happen

Page 9: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

3 Major Components

• The Car: provides the application

• The Cloud: provides the tech, content & communication

• The transportation infrastructure: provides the raw data

Page 10: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

The Car

• Dedicated communication

• On-board Dianogstics (OBD-2)

• LED Display

These all enable the software-defined vehicle.

Page 11: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

Cloud 101

Page 12: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

Goals of “the cloud”

• High availability & reliability of servers

• Accessible anywhere there is internet

• Secure and scalable

Page 13: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

On 4G Now

Future

Cloud Communications Flow

Page 14: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

Transportation data infrastructure

• Communications

• Controllers talking NTCIP

• Central ATMS

Page 15: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

Agenda

• OEMs connectivity needs

• Enabling infrastructure

• How we make it happen

Page 16: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

Private

Agency

Public

Traditional Technology Procurement Model

Sells devices

Uses devices to achieve public good

Tells agency of public issues

Buys devices based onprocurement

Page 17: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

PrivateAgency

Public

Smart Community Partnership

Addresses a socialConcern & sells a service

Shapes competitive landscape

Pays taxes and provides feedback

Page 18: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

Overall SPaT Generation Workflow

1

2

3

4

ATMS

Database Prediction engineCV

applications

Page 19: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

SPAT quality control: live status data monitoring – latency & outage • For example, as a result of product launch

in Las Vegas, TTS has been tracking and reporting data latency and outages

• On 1/24, the Las Vegas central software (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6

• 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds

• In comparison, latency constantly at 20+ at product launch in Dec 2016 and during CES 2017

• The new version is deployed to other cities that use the same central software system; even better latency performances and stable system operations

• These lessons learned from daily product operation and technical support to existing auto OEM customers make the live data feed better each day

• Product operation and maintenance tracking the data latency and outages

• Partner’s software (ATMS.Now) new release 2.6 on 1/24

Central system update

Page 20: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

SPAT quality control: localization to each online signal

• Localization of the prediction engine to each signal control also involves field testing and validation, because of protected/permissive setup and overlap phases

• Sometimes these local settings are logically wired in the controllers, so they are not necessarily seen from live data

• QAQC measure in place: field testing and validation

• For each signal, TTS team goes to the field twice: testing and quality check of topology (MAP data) and ensure protected/permissive or overlap phases are coded into the prediction engine and backend system

• These localization results in the most true-to-real world signal status and predictions

• These are applicable to future autonomous driving as local traffic control rules are reflected in the SPAT as well as the MAP messages.

• A signal in Frisco TX showing an overlap right turn phase (protected); at the same time the left turns are permissive only

Page 21: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

SPAT: prediction accuracy standard

Green funnel chart for a signal in Portland area shows the red-green switch prediction across the day; two phases shown here (one is red-green and the other is green-red)

Page 22: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

Proven V2I implementation

Step 1 –Provide communication to signals

Step 2 –Procure centralized ATMS

Step 3 –Institute a Trusted Data Portal (TDP)

Step 4 –Manage & maintain 24/7 TDP from TMC

Page 23: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

Partnership experience

CCTV Feed Sharing

HERE & Waze Data Sharing

Connected & Autonomous Vehicles

• TSM&O community has experience with this

• Will involve IT and Legal counterparts

• The potential benefits far outweigh the future uncertainty!

Page 24: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

2 methods to institute CV

• Think differently• IoT price-tag will cause nonconventional

innovations

• LOS and Congestion issues can be solved in other ways

• Find common solutions, rather than one-off implementations• Leveraging existing resources is only possible once

agency silos are broken

Page 25: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

A need to innovate…

• Reward for proactiveness: a seat at the table to change the future

• Tomorrow’s problems do not always require a civil solution

• 40,000 yearly fatalities are still occurring

Page 26: Cloud-based Connected Vehicle Deployment · (ATMS.Now) is updated to latest Version2.6 • 85% percent of time data latency is less than 2 seconds • In comparison, latency constantly

Thank [email protected]

https://www.linkedin.com/company/traffic-technology-services-inc-

@PersonalSignal

mailto:[email protected]
https://www.linkedin.com/company/traffic-technology-services-inc-

Mysql Latency

Mysql Latency

CONTINENTAL GTC · 2020. 5. 15. · 0-60mph in 4.8 seconds (0-100km/h in 5.1 seconds) Max. Speed – 195mph / 312km/h Suspension: Independent, automatic air suspension that constantly

CONTINENTAL GTC · 2020. 5. 15. · 0-60mph in 4.8 seconds (0-100km/h in 5.1 seconds) Max. Speed – 195mph / 312km/h Suspension: Independent, automatic air suspension that constantly

How Much Anonymity does Network Latency Leak? · How Much Anonymity Does Network Latency Leak? · 3 using a low-latency anonymity scheme: • A passive linkability attack. When latency

How Much Anonymity does Network Latency Leak? · How Much Anonymity Does Network Latency Leak? · 3 using a low-latency anonymity scheme: • A passive linkability attack. When latency

Interrupt Latency

Interrupt Latency

CPU Sizing vs. Latency Analysis FTS EDR Latency Simulation

CPU Sizing vs. Latency Analysis FTS EDR Latency Simulation

Network Measurement & AAA Œ Overview of My Previous Workcaia.swin.edu.au/talks/CAIA-TALK-040707A.pdf · Metrics: DNS latency, TCP latency, HTTP transaction latency, web page latency,

Network Measurement & AAA Œ Overview of My Previous Workcaia.swin.edu.au/talks/CAIA-TALK-040707A.pdf · Metrics: DNS latency, TCP latency, HTTP transaction latency, web page latency,

Ultra-low Latency Switches XG2000 Series - Fujitsu · Ultra-low Latency Switches XG2000 Series Offers industry-leading low latency in 10GbE Switching (300ns latency) Delivers 400Gbps

Ultra-low Latency Switches XG2000 Series - Fujitsu · Ultra-low Latency Switches XG2000 Series Offers industry-leading low latency in 10GbE Switching (300ns latency) Delivers 400Gbps

  · Web viewWORD DURATION. 0- 75 30 seconds. 76-105 45 seconds. 106-135 60 seconds. 136-165 75 seconds. 166-195 90 seconds. 195-226 105 seconds. 227-255 120 seconds. 256-285 ...

  · Web viewWORD DURATION. 0- 75 30 seconds. 76-105 45 seconds. 106-135 60 seconds. 136-165 75 seconds. 166-195 90 seconds. 195-226 105 seconds. 227-255 120 seconds. 256-285 ...

Communication Latency

Communication Latency

Google big data techniques (2) · • GFS/HDFS are not a good fit for: • Low latency data access (in the milliseconds range) • Many small files • Constantly changing data 2016/12/10

Google big data techniques (2) · • GFS/HDFS are not a good fit for: • Low latency data access (in the milliseconds range) • Many small files • Constantly changing data 2016/12/10

srdf latency

srdf latency

Dual Latency

Dual Latency

ADS-B and Functions for Flight Inspection · The aircraft must compensate for any latency above 0.6 seconds up to the maximum 2.0 seconds by extrapolating the geometric position to

ADS-B and Functions for Flight Inspection · The aircraft must compensate for any latency above 0.6 seconds up to the maximum 2.0 seconds by extrapolating the geometric position to

Edinburgh Research Explorer€¦ · During crosswind flight, if the kite is not constantly steered, it will crash in a matter of seconds. Hence, an “autopilot” must keep the

Edinburgh Research Explorer€¦ · During crosswind flight, if the kite is not constantly steered, it will crash in a matter of seconds. Hence, an “autopilot” must keep the

Apache Kylin OLAP从传bos.itdks.com/f069431ed78a42ffbfc034edb7bda68c.pdfKylin技术架 构 Cube Builder (MapReduce…) SQL Low Latency - Routing Seconds 3rd Party App (Web App, Mobile…)

Apache Kylin OLAP从传bos.itdks.com/f069431ed78a42ffbfc034edb7bda68c.pdfKylin技术架 构 Cube Builder (MapReduce…) SQL Low Latency - Routing Seconds 3rd Party App (Web App, Mobile…)

Instruction for Use (IFU) - Prometheus Medical Ltd · warmer will require an adjustment period of up to 20 seconds. A set of internal sensors constantly measure the fluid temperature

Instruction for Use (IFU) - Prometheus Medical Ltd · warmer will require an adjustment period of up to 20 seconds. A set of internal sensors constantly measure the fluid temperature

UNIT 1 ASSESSMENT PROJECT Skylar Larson. 0.00 seconds 1.50 seconds1.00 seconds 0.50 seconds 3.50 seconds3.00 seconds2.50 seconds2.00 seconds.

UNIT 1 ASSESSMENT PROJECT Skylar Larson. 0.00 seconds 1.50 seconds1.00 seconds 0.50 seconds 3.50 seconds3.00 seconds2.50 seconds2.00 seconds.

tavistockcollegescience.wikispaces.comtavistockcollegescience.wikispaces.com/file/view/January...In the first 2 seconds, the athlete accelerates constantly and reaches a speed of 9m/s.

tavistockcollegescience.wikispaces.comtavistockcollegescience.wikispaces.com/file/view/January...In the first 2 seconds, the athlete accelerates constantly and reaches a speed of 9m/s.

Mobile Product Recognition - GitHub Pagesvijaychan.github.io/Publications/2010 - Mobile Product...Thus, using Send Features mode, we can reduce up to 5 seconds of network latency on

Mobile Product Recognition - GitHub Pagesvijaychan.github.io/Publications/2010 - Mobile Product...Thus, using Send Features mode, we can reduce up to 5 seconds of network latency on

Real-World ADC Interrupt Latency...Preempt-RT Latency Benchmarking of the Cortex-A53 • Software and Hardware setup • Basic Latency Tests • UDP Ping Pong Ethernet Latency •

Real-World ADC Interrupt Latency...Preempt-RT Latency Benchmarking of the Cortex-A53 • Software and Hardware setup • Basic Latency Tests • UDP Ping Pong Ethernet Latency •