A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of a Monoclonal Antibody to PCSK9, SAR236553/REGN727, in Patients with Primary Hypercholesterolemia

James M. McKenney, PharmD,1 Michael J. Koren, MD, FACC,2 Dean J. Kereiakes, MD, FACC,3 Corinne Hanotin, MD,4

Anne-Catherine Ferrand,4 Evan A. Stein, MD, PhD5

1National Clinical Research-Richmond, Inc., Richmond, VA, USA; 2Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research, Jacksonville, FL, USA; 3The Carl and Edyth Lindner Center for Research and

Education at the Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA; 4Sanofi, Paris, France; 5Metabolic and Atherosclerotic Research Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

1

Clinicaltrials.gov no. NCT01288443

Industry Relationships and Institutional Affiliations

Author Disclosure

James M. McKenney Is an employee of a research company that has received research funding from Regeneron and/or SanofiMichael J. Koren

Dean J. Kereiakes Has no relationships to disclose

Corinne HanotinAre employees of Sanofi

Anne-Catherine Ferrand

Evan A. Stein Is an employee of a research company that has received research funding from Regeneron and/or Sanofi, as well as consultancy fees from Sanofi

LDL Receptor Function and Life Cycle

For illustration purposes only

The Role of PCSK9 in the Regulation

of LDL Receptor Expression

For illustration purposes only

Impact of an PCSK9 mAb

on LDL Receptor ExpressionFor illustration purposes only

Background and Rationale

Despite the widespread availability of statins, many patients fail to reach recommended LDL-C targets in clinical practice, even in combination with other lipid lowering agents

In PCSK9 human population studies:– Gain-of-function mutations result in hypercholesterolemia– Loss-of-function mutations associated with low LDL-C and low

prevalence of CHD events

SAR236553/REGN727 is a highly specific, fully human monoclonal antibody (mAb) to PCSK9

A SAR236553/REGN727 Phase 1 trial* in familial and non-familial hypercholesterolemia:– Demonstrated dose dependently reduced LDL-C by 36% to 58% either

with or without atorvastatin– Safe and well-tolerated

*Stein EA, Mellis S, Yancopoulos GD et al. NEJM 2012; 366: 1108-1118.

Study Design

LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL at Wk-1 while taking

atorva 10, 20, or 40 mg for ≥ 6wks

Placebo Q2W

W-7V1a

SAR236553 50mg Q2W

SAR236553 100mg Q2W

SAR236553 150mg Q2W

SAR236553 200mg Q4W w/alt placebo

SAR236553 300mg Q4W w/alt placebo

N=31

N=30

N=31

N=31

N=30

N=30

Diet*

*NCEP ATP-III TLC or equivalent diet

Treatment Period (12 weeks) Follow-up Period (8 weeks)

W-1V1

W0V2

W2V3

W4V4

W6V5

W8V6

W10V7

W12V8

W16V9

W20V10

Screening Period (7 weeks)

Primary Endpoint% calculated LDL-C

from baseline to week 12

Secondary Endpoints% in other

lipoproteins and apolipoproteins and % patients reaching pre-specified LDL-C

levels

Patient Disposition

Screening/run-in (n=514)

Randomized (n=183)

Safety population (n=182)

Efficacy population (mITT [LOCF]; n=179)

Dosing allocation

Analysis

Enrollment

Patient Demographic and Baseline Characteristics

Age, mean 57 years

Female 52%

White race 86%

Hispanic/ Latino ethnicity 22%

On lipid-lowering treatment 86%

Coronary artery disease 5%

Type 2 diabetes 12%

Peripheral vascular disease 3%

Hypertension 45%

Current smoker 20%

Intervention Baseline LDL-C (mg/dL)

% ChangeLDL-C1

Placebo 130.2 –5.1 (3.1)

SAR236553 50mg Q2W 123.2 –39.6 (3.2)*

SAR236553 100mg Q2W 127.0 –64.2 (3.1)*

SAR236553 150mg Q2W 123.9 –72.4 (3.2)*

SAR236553 200mg Q4W 128.2 –43.2 (3.3)*

SAR236553 300mg Q4W 131.6 –47.7 (3.2)*

Changes in LDL-C from Baseline to Week 12 by Treatment Group (mITT Population)

*P<0.0001 for % change SAR236553 vs. placebo1LS mean (SE), using LOCF method

BASELINE WEEK 2 WEEK 4 WEEK 6 WEEK 8 WEEK 10 WEEK 12

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

Placebo SAR236553 50 mg Q2W SAR236553 100 mg Q2W SAR236553 150 mg Q2W

Change in Calculated LDL-C at 2 Weekly Intervals from Baseline to Week 12

11

Mean percentage change in calculated LDL-C from baseline to weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, by treatment group. Week 12 estimation using LOCF method.

LD

L-C

Mea

n (S

E)

% C

ha

ng

e fr

om

Ba

seli

ne

∆ - 8.5%

∆ - 30.5%

∆ - 53.6%

∆ - 62.9%

∆ - 64.2%

∆ - 5.1%

∆ - 39.6%

∆ - 72.4%

Change in Calculated LDL-C at 2 Weekly Intervals from Baseline to Week 12

12

Mean percentage change in calculated LDL-C from baseline to weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, by treatment group. Week 12 estimation using LOCF method.

LD

L-C

Mea

n (S

E)

% C

ha

ng

e fr

om

Ba

seli

ne

BASELINE WEEK 2 WEEK 4 WEEK 6 WEEK 8 WEEK 10 WEEK 12

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

Placebo SAR236553 50 mg Q2W SAR236553 100 mg Q2W SAR236553 200 mg Q4W

SAR236553 300 mg Q4W SAR236553 150 mg Q2W

∆ - 64.2%

∆ - 47.7%

∆ - 5.1%

∆ - 39.6%

∆ - 72.4%

∆ - 43.2%

Change in Calculated LDL-C at 2 Weekly Intervals from Baseline to Week 12

13

Mean percentage change in calculated LDL-C from baseline to weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, by treatment group. Week 12 estimation using LOCF method.

LD

L-C

Mea

n (S

E)

% C

ha

ng

e fr

om

Ba

seli

ne

BASELINE WEEK 2 WEEK 4 WEEK 6 WEEK 8 WEEK 10 WEEK 12

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

Placebo SAR236553 50 mg Q2W SAR236553 100 mg Q2W SAR236553 200 mg Q4W

SAR236553 300 mg Q4W SAR236553 150 mg Q2W

∆ - 64.2%

∆ - 47.7%

∆ - 5.1%

∆ - 39.6%

∆ - 72.4%

∆ - 43.2%

16

93 97 100

8997

3

47

84

100

46

57

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Placebo 50mg Q2W 100mg Q2W 150mg Q2W 200mg Q4W 300mg Q4W

% LDL-C <100mg/dL % LDL-C <70mg/dL

% P

atie

nts

Ach

ievi

ng

Pre

spe

cifi

ed L

DL

-C L

eve

lAttainment of Prespecified LDL-C Levels

at Week 12 (mITT Population)

Intervention % ChangeApo B

% ChangeNon–HDL-C

% ChangeLp (a)

Placebo 2.2 –2.2 0.0

SAR236553 50mg Q2W –27.3* –33.6* –13.3†

SAR236553 100mg Q2W –48.1* –55.6* –26.1*

SAR236553 150mg Q2W –56.1* –62.5* –28.6*

SAR236553 200mg Q4W –28.7* –37.4* –16.7†

SAR236553 300mg Q4W –33.1* –40.7* –7.9†

Changes in Apo B, Non–HDL-C and Lp (a) from Baseline to Week 12 by Treatment Group (mITT Population)

*P<0.0001 for % change SAR236553 vs. placebo†P=0.05 for % change SAR236553 vs. placebo P values are not adjusted for multiplicity (descriptive only)

Changes in TG, HDL-C, and Apo AI from Baseline to Week 12 by Treatment Group (mITT Population)

TG HDL-C Apo AI

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

Placebo SAR236553 50mg Q2W SAR236553 100mg Q2W

SAR236553 150mg Q2W SAR236553 200mg Q4W SAR236553 300mg Q4W

% C

han

ge

fro

m B

asel

ine

at W

eek

12

1 2 1

1LS mean (SE)2median (Q1-Q3)

Summary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Population)

Q2W dosing Q4W dosing

Placebo (N=31)

50mg (N=30)

100mg (N=31)

150mg (N=31)

200mg (N=30)

300mg (N=30)

Overview of all TEAEs – no.

Any TEAE

14

18

20

19 20 14

Any treatment-emergent SAE

1

0

1

0 1 1

Any TEAE leading to permanent treatment d/c

0 0

1

1

3

1

AEs of special interest — no.

ALT or AST >3 x ULN 0 0 0 0 0 0

Muscle (including pain, weakness) 1 1 2 1 1 2

CK >10 x ULN 1 0 0 0 0 0

Injection-site reactions occurred in the SAR236553 groups only and were generally mild and non-progressive.

Serious Adverse Events

57-year-old male developed diarrhea followed by rash on his arms, legs, and abdomen 9 days after receiving his

first injection of SAR236553 300mg.

Leukocytoclastic vasculitis diagnosed by biopsy

Prednisone begun with full resolution

No organ involvement per signs and symptoms

No anti-drug antibodies 2 weeks before or after the incident

ANA, IgG, IgA, IgM, IgE, tryptase, anti-dsDNA, complement 5 WNL

Investigator considered this a “significant medical event” related to IP

SAR236553 produced significant, dose-dependent LDL-C reductions– Up to 72% LDL-C reduction with 150mg Q2W– Improved ability to achieve LDL-C goal cut points– LDL-C reductions were generally unaffected by baseline atorvastatin dose

Consistent and robust reductions for all other Apo B–containing lipoproteins – Important reduction in Lp (a), consistent with prior studies

Trend towards decreases in TG and increases in HDL-C and Apo AI vs placebo

More sustained efficacy with Q2W vs. Q4W regimen

SAR236553 was well tolerated during this short study– No signals for persistent or prevalent clinical or laboratory adverse events

including hepatic and muscle assessments.– One patient experienced an occurrence of leukocytoclastic vasculitis; no similar

reactions reported in prior studies

These results support further evaluation of SAR236553 in larger, more diverse patient populations with different background therapies to fully assess its efficacy and safety.

Summary and Conclusions

Q&A