Epidemiology of Tuberculosis Prof. Ashry Gad Mohamed MBChB, MPH, DrPH.
Clinical trial The Way We Make Progress Against Disease Prof. Ashry Gad Mohamed Prof. of...
-
date post
21-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Clinical trial The Way We Make Progress Against Disease Prof. Ashry Gad Mohamed Prof. of...
Clinical trialThe Way We Make Progress
Against Disease
Prof. Ashry Gad Mohamed
Prof. of Epidemiology
College of Medicine & KKUH
Definition
a clinical trial is defined as a planned experiment on humans. the setting is in health institutions environment and it usually involves patients.
Rationale
Before a new treatment method is made available to the public it must be studied and tested for safety and effectiveness.
Each treatment must be tested in increasingly larger numbers of people to determine the effects in a large range of people. (Phases)
Each study must follow a rigorous study plan with protections for participants. (protocol)
RCT is the gold standard for evidence.
Fields of clinical trials
Quality of life
Therapy
Prognosis
PreventionDiagnosis
Compliance
Clinical trial
Treatment Trials
• What new treatments can help people with a particular disease?
• What is the most effective treatment for people with that disease?
Treatment Trials
• Many treatment trials compare two or more different approaches to treating a disease
• Participants will take either:– The best accepted
treatment– A new treatment
Prevention Trials
What approaches can prevent healthy people from developing disease?
Prevention Trials
Two kinds, that ask participants to either:1. Do something2. Take something
Basic terms in clinical trial
• Investigators
• Participants
• Intervention
• Outcome
Phases of clinical trial
Phase 1
Prerequisite: In vitro data support the
hypothesis
Who? Healthy volunteers or hopeless cases
How many? Small group (20 – 80)
Why? To determine the best way to give
people the drug.
How often should be given?
What is the safest dose?
(Safety & metabolism in human)
Phase 2
Why? Drug effectiveness in particular
indication.(How well the drug
works?)
Short term common side effects.
Therapeutic pilot study
WHO? Larger group of patients
(100- 300).
Phase 3Why? Confirm effectiveness.
Short & long term side effects.
Double blind randomized placebo controlled trials
How many? Hundreds or thousands
patients.
Approval
Phase 4
When? Post marketing surveillance.
Why? Different populations.
Long term side effects.
Never end.
Steps of clinical trial
1-Formulation of the hypothesis.• Hormone replacement treatment (HRT) and
Breast cancer.
• Trial of Vitamin D and calcium supplementation and hip fracture.
• Use of statins for the prevention of Myocardial Infarction.
• Use of the oral contraceptive pill and deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
2-Definition of
Reference population.
Experimental population.
Necessary sample size.
inclusion criteria.
exclusion criteria.
3- Informed consent
A process by which a subject voluntarily confirms his/her willingness to participate in a particular trial after having been informed of all aspects of the trial that are relevant the subjects decision to participate.
Protecting Patients’ Safety
Informed Consent Before agreeing to take part, patients have the right to understand all that is involved in a clinical trial:
• Procedures and treatments
• Tests• Possible risks and benefits
Protecting Patients’ Safety
Institutional Review Board
• Committee made up of experts
Benefits of Taking Part
Possible benefits:• Patients will receive, at a minimum, the
best standard treatment• If the new approach is proven to work,
patients may be among the first to benefit• Patients have a chance to help others
and improve health care
Risks of Taking Part
Possible risks:
• Unknown side effects or other risks
• New treatment may not help every participant
• Costs
4-Allocation of regimens
Intervention versus Placebo
Current treatment
Nothing
Randomization
Aim
Methods
Variants of clinical trials:• 1-Parallel design: Parallel groups design: each patient
receives only one treatment.
Follow up
Ref. Pop. Sample
Intervention
Control
OUTCOME
2-Crossover design: each patient receives all/both treatments in random order, often with a washout period between treatments•Disease: Chronic, incurable stable disease.•Intervention: rapid onset & short duration
Treat. A
Treat. B
Treat. A
Treat. B
washoutperiod
1st treatmentperiod
2nd treatmentperiod
3-Factorial Design
Sample
Drug A Placebo
Drug B Placebo Drug B Placebo
Clinical trial & number of participants
• 1-Mega Trial Thousands of patients Multiple centers Statistical power Generalization
• 2-Sequential trial No specified sample size Continuous recruitment Clear benefit / no difference
• 3- Fixed size trial
Most common
Study power
• 4- N of one
Every physician
Routine work
BlindingOne or more of the people involved in the
trial is unaware of the intervention.
1- Open trial
2- Single- blind trial
3- Double blind trial
4-Double blind double dummy trial
5- Triple and quadruple blind
Collection of baseline data
• Disease, medical & demographic characteristics.
• Similarity in all aspect except intervention.
Follow up• Quantity• Quality• Compliance
Outcome
• Objective Vs subjective.
• Surrogate Vs hard outcome.
Analysis
60 45
15
Intension to treat analysis.
15/ 60 =0.25 =25%
Protocol analysis.
15/45 = 0.33 =33%
Relative RiskGroupoutcomeTotal
positiveNegative
Interventionaba +b
Controlcdc +d
Measures of effect size 1-Relative risk (RR)
–Is the ratio of the risk of a given event in one group of subjects compared to another group
Experimental Event Rate (EER) ----------------------------------------------- Control Event Rate (CER )
EER: The percentage of intervention group who experienced outcome in question. ( a/(a + b))
CER: The percentage of control group who experienced outcome in question. (c /( c + d))
2-Relative risk reduction (RRR)
–The proportion of the initial or baseline risk which was eliminated by a given treatment/intervention or by avoidance of exposure to a risk factor
–RRR= (CER – EER) / CER
3-Absolute risk reduction (ARR)
–The difference in risk of a given event, between
two groups
–ARR= CER - EER
4-Number Needed to Treat (NNT)
–It is defined as the number needed to treat in order to prevent one additional adverse event (e.g. death)
–NNT = 1/ ARR
–Its clinical importance depends on Initial probability of the outcome.
RR=(18/64) / (29/65) = 0.281/0.446 =0.63 =63%
95% CI= 0.39 – 1.01 Source: N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 1527-1532.
InterventionOutcomeTotal
Deathsurvival
Ligation184664
sclerotherapy293665
2-Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR): ARR= CER - EER =(29/65) – (18/64) =0.446 – 0.281 = 0.165 = 16.5% 3-Relative Risk Reduction (RRR)
RRR= (CER – EER) / CER =(0.446 – 0.281) / 0.446 =0.165 / 0.446 = 0.37 = 37% i.e. Legation decreases the risk of death by 37%
4-Number Needed to Treat (NNT):
NNT = 1/ ARR = 1 / 0.165 = 6.06 =6 patients You have to treat 6 patients by ligation to save one life
Over 17000 patients suspected of having acute myocardial infraction were randomised to receive treatment (1) oral aspirin or (2) no aspirin. The table below presents results for vascular mortality at five weeks:
17187153671820total
860075841016no aspirin
85877783804aspirin
totalnot dieddied
ARR (for dying) = I(804/8587) – (1016/8600)I =0.024(24 deaths may possibly be prevented for each 1000 patients)
RR (for dying) = (804/8587) / (1016/8600) = 0.79(those taking aspirin are at a lower risk of dying)
RRR(for dying) = RR x 100% = 21%(aspirin reduced the risk of death at 5 weeks by 21%)
NNT= 1/ARR =42
Source:A-Z of medical statistics
Example
• A multi-centre, randomised placebo-controlled trial of the beta blocking drug Timolol, reported the number of deaths in 18 months of follow-up among patients who had recently suffered a myocardial infarction.
(New England Journal of Medicine. 1981;304: 801-7).
Calculations
1) Risk (timolol) = 98/945 = 0.104 (10.4%)2) Risk (placebo) = 152/939 = 0.162 (16.2%)
1) ARR = 0.162 – 0.104 = 0.058 95% CI (0.028, 0.089)
6) NNT = 1/0.058 [100/5.8] = 17 people
diedsurvived
timolol98847945
placebo152787939
Ethical issues
• Informed consent
• Confidentiality
• Stopping rules
Independent monitoring group
Clear existence of benefits
Clear existence of harm