Clinical supervision what’s the point?...Reviewer on Social Mobility and Child Poverty’...

40
Clinical supervision what’s the point? Alan Russell & Catherine Evans London South Bank University LawWorks Round Table 14 June 2017

Transcript of Clinical supervision what’s the point?...Reviewer on Social Mobility and Child Poverty’...

  • Clinical supervision –what’s the point?

    Alan Russell & Catherine Evans

    London South Bank UniversityLawWorks Round Table 14 June 2017

  • PRINCIPAL AIMS

    1. Tangible benefit to the local community.

    2. Develop students’ practical knowledge of

    the law in context in order to boost their

    confidence, skills and employability.

    3. Teaching and learning resource for other

    universities.

  • CONTEXT

    • A widening participation institution

    • 25% UG law students live locally in south & east London

    • 57% women

    • 65% over 21

    • 70% non-white

    • 52% in paid employment (80% working 9 hours plus)

    • 17% caring for at least one school age child

  • CONTEXT

    Students unlikely to have links to the legal professions

    • ‘Unleashing Aspiration: Final Report of the Panel on Fair Access to the Professions (Milburn , 2009)

    • ‘Access to Professional Careers, a Progress Report by the Independent Reviewer on Social Mobility and Child Poverty’ (Milburn, 2012)

  • CONTEXT

    • ABS – Legal Services Act 2007

    • Information technology

    • Paralegals

    • Fewer training contracts and pupillages

    • University tuition fees –£9,000 PA

  • CONTEXT

    • Clustering

    • Early intervention

    • Impact on health and wellbeing

    • ‘Referral fatigue’

  • CONTEXT

    Housing & Homelessness

    Family

    Debt

    Immigration

    Employment

    Education

    Welfare Benefits

  • CONTEXT

    • Southwark ranked

    23rd most deprived

    out of 326 local

    districts in England

    (DCLG 2015)

    • Demand for SWL

    advice enormous

    • Supply very limited

  • CONTEXT

    • Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (LASPO) 2012

    • £320 million savings PA

    • Legal Help Scheme slashed

    • Welfare benefits, debt, employment, education, immigration advice out of scope

    • Housing and family advice severely restricted

  • DROP-IN SOCIAL WELFARE

    LAW ADVICE• Drop-in face to face

    social welfare law advice

    • Drop-in 3 x 3 hours a week

    • Staffed by students; supervised by university employed solicitors

    • Minimum 12 week placement

    • 24 clients a week

  • Reception

    • Initial details

    Interview Part 1

    • Fact-finding

    • Establish what client wants

    Research enquiry

    • Using Advice-guide and other resources

    Consult supervisor

    • Agree the content of your advice to the client

    Interview Part 2

    • Advise the client

    Finish the enquiry

    • Write up an accurate case record

  • DAY TIME DROP-IN

    • Basic information on any legal topic

    • Generalist advice in all areas of social

    welfare law (save immigration)

    • Signpost/referral to other local legal advice

    agencies and law firms

    • Refer to our own evening sessions

  • EVENING SESSIONS

    Students shadow pro bono solicitors &

    barristers giving specialist legal advice in

    • Housing

    • Family

    • Employment

  • CLIENT OUTPUTS

    3500+ clients helped

  • CLIENT OUTPUTS

  • 19

  • STUDENTS – LEARNING

    Modelling CollaboratingStudents

    taking control

  • STUDENTS – LEARNING

    • In at the deep end – first point of contact

    • Translating client concerns into legally

    recognisable categories

    • Interviewing skills

    • Practical legal knowledge

    • Understanding of client care and

    professional ethics

  • STUDENTS – FEEDBACK

    • Instant feedback from supervisors

    • Peer to peer feedback

    • Writing skills – the advice record

  • FEEDBACK

    D. Nicol and D. Macfarlane-Dick, ‘Formative

    assessment and self-regulated learning: a

    model and seven principles of good

    feedback practice’ (2006) 31(2) Studies in

    Higher Education 199

  • GOOD SUPERVISION

    Good Supervision

    Good Feedback

  • SELF REGULATION

    Good feedback

    Self -Regulation

  • SELF REGULATION

    • Nicol and Macfarlene-Dick use the definition

    of Pintrich and Zucho (2002) for self –

    regulation:

    “ an active constructive process whereby

    learners set goals for their behaviour and

    monitor, regulate, and control their cognition,

    motivation, and behaviour, guided and

    constrained by their goals and the contextual

    features of the environment “(p64)

  • SEVEN PRINCIPLES

    Clarifies goals

    Reflection

    High quality

    Dialogue

    Self esteem

    Close the gap

    Shapes Teaching

  • FEEDBACK IN LSBU LAC

    StandardsSelf-

    Assessing

    Timely & regular

    Discourse

    Low Stakes

    PracticeTailored

  • SO….

    • Style of supervision in the Legal Advice

    Clinic leads to not only skilled interviewers

    but also to a self – regulated approach to

    learning.

  • CLIENTS – QUALITY &

    EFFECTIVENESS

    • Intensity of supervision attracts and

    reassures clients

    • CAB ‘plus’ advice

    • High resolution rates

  • CLIENTS – QUALITY &

    EFFECTIVENESS

  • CLIENTS – QUALITY &

    EFFECTIVENESS

    Advice received helped me

    understand my rights – 99%

    I had confidence in

    the advice given – 99%

    Service rated excellent or good - 97%

    I would recommend service to

    others – 99%

  • SUPERVISORS –

    QUALIFICATION, EXPERIENCE &

    WORKLOAD• 1.2 FTE

    • But 6 qualified, experienced practising

    lawyers all with extensive SWL experience

    in law centres and private practice

    • Experienced CAB advisor?

    • Combined clinic and traditional teaching

    role is vital

  • INSURANCE, COMPLAINTS &

    RISKS

    • Professional indemnity insurance added to

    University’s existing policy

    • Constant supervision minimises complaint,

    litigation & reputational risks

  • LIMITS ON STUDENT NUMBERS?

    • 40 students on extended placement – 12 X 3 hour sessions

    • Shorter placement would dilute experience significantly

    • No economies of scale in our model

    • Wide range of student capabilities can be accommodated

  • LIMITS ON CLIENT NUMBERS,

    CASE TYPE & SERVICE?

    • Resourcing

    • Demand

    • Supervision expertise

    • Advice only or full casework and

    representation service?

  • ANY ADVICE BETER THAN

    NOTHING?

    • Self-evidently not

    • Can make things worse

  • PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

    ISSUES

    • Always present in the drop-in model

    • Opportunity – teaching and learning

    • Threat – they get overlooked

  • THE FUTURE

    • Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE)

    • No more training contract

    • 2 years re Pre Qualifying Work Experience

    (QWE)

    • Work in university clinic counts to PQE

    http://www.sra.org.uk/documents/SRA/consu

    ltations/sqe-summary-responses.pdf

    http://www.sra.org.uk/documents/SRA/consultations/sqe-summary-responses.pdf

  • Alan Russell

    [email protected]

    Catherine Evans

    [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]