Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

41
SLIDE 1 CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING Rebecca E. Wrishko, Ph.D. Senior Pharmacokineticist MARCH 25, 2004

Transcript of Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

Page 1: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 1

CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICSTHERAPEUTIC DRUG

MONITORINGRebecca E. Wrishko, Ph.D.Senior Pharmacokineticist

MARCH 25, 2004

Page 2: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 2

Learning Objectives

• Define Clinical Pharmacokinetics

• Recognize the Differences between Wide and Narrow Therapeutic Windows

• Understand the Rational of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

• Complete Clinical Case Examples Using Common Pharmacokinetic Equations– Vancomycin Pharmacokinetics– Gentamicin Pharmacokinetics

Page 3: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 3

Clinical Pharmacokinetics• Application of pharmacokinetic principles to the therapeutic

management of patients in clinical pharmacokinetics. The magnitudes of both the desired response and toxicity are functions of the drug concentration at the site(s) of action.

The magnitudes of both the desired response and toxicity may be functions of the drug concentration at the site(s) of action.

Page 4: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 4

THERAPEUTIC WINDOW• Therapeutic failure results when either the concentration is

too low, ineffective therapy, or is too high, producing unacceptable toxicity. Between these limits of concentration lies a region associated with therapeutic success – regarded as a THERAPEUTIC WINDOW

This figure illustrates the concentrations that follow the administration of two regimens, A and B; whereby, the dosing interval is the same, but the dose given in B is TWICE that given in A.

Page 5: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 5

Therapeutic Window• Both the width of the therapeutic window and the rate of drug elimination

govern the size of the maintenance dose and the frequency of administration.

• When the window is narrow and the drug is eliminated rapidly, small doses must be given often to achieve therapeutic success.

• In contrast, some drugs are administered relatively infrequently, producing large fluctuations in the plasma concentrations. The reasons may include: development of tolerance or need to produce high concentrations for short periods of time (antibiotics).

• For the majority of patients, knowledge of a drug’s therapeutic plasma concentration range and pharmacokinetics should lead to a more rapid establishment of a safe and efficacious dosage regimen.

• The narrower the therapeutic range (factor of 2 – 3 difference between upper and lower limit), the more difficult to maintain values in it.

• Also, some drugs are used to treat several disease, and the therapeutic plasma concentration range may differ with the disease.

Page 6: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 6

Wide Therapeutic Window

WIDE THERAPEUTIC WINDOW

Here toxicity occurs at concentrations well above those needed to achieve maximum desired effect.

TOXICITY

EFFICACY

Page 7: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 7

Narrow Therapeutic Window

NARROW THERAPEUTIC WINDOW

The response curves overlap well below maximal efficacy, so it is difficult to find plasma concentrations that produce efficacy without some degree of toxicity.

EFFICACYTOXICITY

Page 8: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 8

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring• Plasma concentration of a drug must correlate quantitatively with both the

intensity and probability of therapeutic or toxic effects.

• A direct relationship between concentration and effect may be insufficient grounds for plasma concentration monitoring if the therapeutic effect itself is easily monitored.

• Most relevant when the objective is to maintain a therapeutic effect by maintaining a concentrations within a limited range and when thelikelihood of toxicity can be predicted from the concentration.

• Important with narrow therapeutic window when therapeutic failure is likely.

• Dose adjustment can often be anticipated based upon the patient’s age, weight, and clinical status, especially renal, hepatic, and cardiovascular functions.

• Even after accounting for these factors, sufficient uncertainty often remains in the patient-specific (individual) kinetics of the drug to warrant plasma concentration monitoring.

Page 9: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 9

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring• Information required to evaluate measured plasma

concentrations include:– History of Drug Administration– Time of Sampling– Present and Previous (if applicable) Plasma Drug

Concentrations– Clinical Status of the Patient– Physiological Data– Concurrent Drug Therapy

• From such observations, the patient’s current pharmacokinetic parameters can be estimated, and a new dosage regimen can be designed to more closely achieve the target value(s).

Page 10: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 10

First Order Elimination

Elimination Rate Constant (ke)

• Characterizes the elimination process and is a true constant that is independent of concentration.

• Represents the fraction or % of the total amount of drug in the body removed per unit time. This behavior may be expressed as:

• Function of clearance (elimination) and volume of distribution (amount of drug in the body).

Page 11: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 11

Elimination Rate Constant (ke)

Page 12: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 12

Half-life (t1/2)• More common to refer to the t1/2 rather than to the

elimination rate constant of a drug. The t1/2 of a drug that is eliminated by first-order kinetics is concentration-independent.

• Represents the amount of time required for the total amount of drug to decrease by 50% and may be expressed as:

• Reflects rather than controls volume of distribution and clearance, two independent parameters.

Page 13: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 13

Half-life (t1/2)

• Over 95% of the drug is lost or eliminated in 5 half-lives, which is typically considered to be the completion of the process.

Page 14: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 14

Clearance (CL)

• Only represents the theoretical volume of blood or plasma that is completely cleared of drug in a given period of time.

• Total clearance is a proportionality factor relating drug elimination to the plasma concentration.

• Note, rate of elimination decreases with time due to a decrease in drug concentration; however, the ability of the organs to remove the drug remains constant.

Page 15: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 15

Volume of Distribution (Vd)

• Apparent Vd does not necessarily refer to a physiological volume, it is a mathematical factor relating the amount of drug in the body and the concentration of drug measured in the plasma.

• Apparent Vd that is greater than the plasma compartment(3 L) only indicates that the drug is also present outside that compartment.

Page 16: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 16

VancomycinTherapeutic Indications• Infections caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

(MRSA) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE). – important pathogens in patients with prosthetic devices.

• Enterococcal and nonenterococcal infections in patients with a penicillin hypersensitivity.

• Sepsis caused by nondiptheria Corynebacterium species in theimmunocompromised host.

• Pseudomembranous colitis (PMC) or antibiotic-associated Clostridiumdifficile colitis, mediated by the Clostridium difficile toxin.

• Prophylaxis against postoperative infections caused by gram positive organisms.

Page 17: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 17

Vancomycin – Toxicity and Adverse EffectsOtotoxicity• Characterized by damage to the auditory nerve, leading to permanent hearing

loss. Loss of accuity to high frequency tone and tinnitus are frequent antecedents.

• Generally considered that serum concentrations in the range of 80-100 mg/L are associated with auditory toxicity.

• Unclear whether excess peak or trough concentrations are primarily related to the development of ototoxicity.

Nephrotoxicity• Evidence suggests that the risk increases with increasing serum

concentrations; however, a well-defined correlation has not been established.

• Unclear whether nephrotoxicity is due to underlying pathology, concurrent therapy with other nephrotoxic agents, or to the antibiotic.

Other• Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia

Page 18: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 18

Vancomycin – Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

• Desired peak serum concentrations = 30 - 40 mg/L• Desired trough serum concentrations = 5 - 10 mg/L

!Due to large interpatient variability in the pharmacokinetics and potential ototoxicity andnephrotoxicity, serum concentrations should be monitored, especially in high-risk patients, those with renal impairment or who are given otherototoxic and/or nephrotoxic agents concurrently.

Page 19: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 19

Vancomycin – Therapeutic Drug Monitoring• Monitoring serum concentrations has been a challenge to clinicians

due to the distributional characteristics of the drug. ASSUMPTION: FIRST-ORDER ELIMINATION FROM ONE-COMPARTMENT.

• The timing of serum sampling for peak concentrations has long been an area of controversy since times reported in the literature are inconsistent and do not permit an evaluation to discriminateototoxicity associated with elevated distributive or elimination phase concentrations.

• A clinically rational time for drawing the peak concentration is 1 hour following the 1-hour intermittent intravenous infusion of the third dose. Often, a peak concentration may be obtained 3 hours following a 1-hour intermittent intravenous infusion. ASSUMPTION: DISTRIBUTION IS COMPLETE WITH THIS SAMPLING STRATEGY.

Page 20: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 20

Vancomycin – Therapeutic Drug Monitoring• Samples to determine trough concentration should be procured just

prior to the third dose, often 0.5 hours . ASSUMPTION: STEADY-STATE IS ACHIEVED.

• Generally, serum samples should be obtained at steady-state when all of the pharmacokinetic values are at equilibrium.

• Monitoring trough concentrations alone is acceptable in otherwise normal healthy patients, following an initial set of peak and trough concentrations.

• For patients with fluctuating renal function, a pre-dose serum concentration and a series of post-dose serum concentrations should be obtained during the course of therapy.

Page 21: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 21

GentamicinTherapeutic Indications• Infections caused by gram-negative aerobes (Klebsiella, E.coli,

Enterococci, Pseudomonas and Serratia.

• Urinary tract, bone/joint, soft tissue (including burns), endocarditis, and intra-abdominal/pelvic infections.

• Empiric regimens for febrile neutropenic patients.

Page 22: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 22

Gentamicin – Toxicity and Adverse EffectsOtotoxicity• Characterized by cochlear damage with loss of high frequency tone.

• Vestibular toxicity may be more clinically obvious with nystagmus and ataxia.

• Excess peak concentrations may be related to the development ofototoxicity.

Nephrotoxicity• Evidence suggests that the risk increases with increasing serum

concentrations.

• Unclear whether nephrotoxicity is due to underlying pathology, concurrent therapy with other nephrotoxic agents, or to the antibiotic.

Other• Hypersensitivity reactions, and neuromuscular blockade

Page 23: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 23

Gentamicin – Therapeutic Drug Monitoring• Desired peak serum concentrations = 6.0 - 10 mg/L• Desired trough serum concentrations = 0.5 – 2.0 mg/L

!Due to large interpatient variability in the pharmacokinetics and potential ototoxicity andnephrotoxicity, serum concentrations should be monitored, especially in high-risk patients, those with renal impairment or who are given other ototoxic and/or nephrotoxic agents concurrently.

Page 24: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 24

Gentamicin – Therapeutic Drug Monitoring• Monitoring serum concentrations has been a challenge to clinicians due to the

distributional characteristics of the drug. ASSUMPTION: FIRST-ORDER ELIMINATION FROM ONE-COMPARTMENT.

• The peak concentration is drawn 30 minutes following the 30-minute intermittent intravenous infusion. ASSUMPTION: DISTRIBUTION IS COMPLETE WITH THIS SAMPLING STRATEGY.

• Samples to determine trough concentration should be procured just prior to the third dose, often 0.5 hours . ASSUMPTION: STEADY-STATE ACHIEVED.

• Monitoring trough concentrations alone is acceptable in otherwise normal healthy patients, following an initial set of peak and trough concentrations.

• For patients with fluctuating renal function, a pre-dose serum concentration and a series of post-dose serum concentrations should be obtained during the course of therapy.

Page 25: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 25

Pharmacokinetics ofGentamicin and Vancomycin

Page 26: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 26

Sample VancomycinPharmacokinetic Calculations

Page 27: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 27

VancomycinPharmacokinetic Profile of

Sample Patient

Page 28: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 28

Calculations(1) Slope (Elimination Rate Constant, kel)Cp1 at 2.08 hours (60+65 min) = 27 mg/LCp2 at 17.33 hours (18 hrs-40min) = 1 mg/L

ke = ln (Cp1/Cp2) = ln (27/1) = 0.22 h-1

t2-t1 17.33 – 2.08

(2) Half-life (t1/2)

t1/2 = 0.693 = 0.693 = 3.15 h-1

ke 0.22 h-1

(3) Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd)Vd = Dose = 35 mg = 1.35 L

Cp1 - Cp2 27 – 1 mg/L

(4) New DoseDesire a peak = 30 mg/L (35 mg/27 mg/L) = (x/30 mg/L) x = 38.89 mg; 40 mg

(5) New Dosage IntervalDesire a trough = 6 mg/L ln (target peak/target trough) = ln (31/6) = 7.5 hours Q8H

ke 0.22 h-1

Page 29: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 29

Comparison of Pharmacokinetic Methods

Page 30: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 30

Gentamicin Sample Pharmacokinetic Calculations

Page 31: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 31

Gentamicin – Pharmacokinetic Profile of Sample Patient

Page 32: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 32

Calculations(1) Slope (Elimination Rate Constant, kel)Cp1 at 1.33 hours (30+50 min) = 6.2 mg/LCp2 at 18.2 hours = 1.7 mg/L

(2) Half-life (t1/2)

(3) Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd)

(4) New Dose

(5) New Dosage Interval

Page 33: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 33

Comparison of Pharmacokinetic Methods

Page 34: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 34

Pharmacokinetic Equations

Page 35: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 35

Pharmacokinetic Equations

Page 36: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 36

Pharmacokinetic Equations

Page 37: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 37

Pharmacokinetic Equations

Page 38: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 38

Pharmacokinetic Equations

Page 39: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 39

Dosing in Renal InsufficiencyA linear relationship between Clvanc and CLcr

Page 40: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 40

Dosing in Renal InsufficiencyA linear relationship between Clvanc and CLcr

Page 41: Clinical Pharmacokinetics Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

SLIDE 41

Dosing in Renal InsufficiencyA linear relationship between Clvanc and CLcr