Clinical implementation of next-generation sequencing for diagnostics - Karin Kassahn
-
Upload
australian-bioinformatics-network -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
1.717 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Clinical implementation of next-generation sequencing for diagnostics - Karin Kassahn
For our patients and our population
Clinical implementation of next-generation sequencing for diagnostics
AMATA 2013
16th October 2013
Dr Karin Kassahn
Head, Technology Advancement Unit,
Genetic & Molecular Pathology
SA Pathology
For our patients and our population
Tales from the clinical frontline… making personal genomics mainstream
AMATA 2013
16th October 2013
Dr Karin Kassahn
Head, Technology Advancement Unit,
Genetic & Molecular Pathology
SA Pathology
For our patients and our population
16 May 2013
For our patients and our population
Now that the genome is done…
June 25, 2000
For our patients and our population
Genome
Structure
Genome
Biology
Biology of
Disease
Advancing
Medicine
Improving
Healthcare
1990-2003
HGP
2004-2010
2011-2020
Beyond
2020
Charting a course for genomic
medicine from base pairs to bedside
Green, Guyer, NHGRI Nature 2011
For our patients and our population
Pharmaco-
genomics
Personal Genomics on the Rise
Personalised
Medicine
Personal
Genomics
Carrier
Screening
Familial
Cancer
Prenatal
Testing
Inherited
Disease
Cardio-
myopathies
Molecular
Oncology
Pediatric
Intellectual
Disability
For our patients and our population
Outline
• Diagnostics today and current trends
• What technology (panels vs exomes)
• Implementation challenges:
Bioinformatics/ IT
Clinical annotation/ interpretation
For our patients and our population
Diagnostic Genetic Testing in Oz
Largely funded at State level with variable patient co-
contribution
Limited Medicare-rebate for genetic tests; inconsistent
schedule
Specialised referral mechanisms (clinical geneticists)
National Referral Labs for key specialities
NPAAC guidelines – informed by RCPA and HGSA
accreditation via NATA
For our patients and our population
SA Pathology: Genetic & Molecular Pathology
>25,000 genetic tests per annum, >100 genes routinely
Sanger sequencing of >50 genes
Diversity of methods:
• FISH
• MLPA
• Fragment analysis/ AFLP
• GAP-PCR
• Long-range PCR
• qRT-PCR/ fluorescent PCR
• GC rich PCR
• Methylation PCR
• Primer extension assay
• Sanger sequencing
• Sequenom
For our patients and our population
SA Pathology: Genetic & Molecular Pathology
>25,000 genetic tests per annum, >100 genes routinely
Sanger sequencing of >50 genes
Current costs:
Sequenom single hotspot: $50
Sanger single amplicon: $100
Sanger full ORF: $250 - $1,700
Send-aways: $40 - $4,000 ($600 avg)
For our patients and our population
Current trends in diagnostics
Increasing testing demand (20% overall, “Angelina Jolie Effect”)
Health budgets under significant pressure
New markers of clinical utility (oncology, cardiology, …)
“Diagnostic odyssey” (e.g. complex disorders, ID)
Emerging Private Market (Wellness Genomes, Direct-to-Consumer)
Internationalisation of testing
Stronger integration between research and diagnostics
For our patients and our population
Current trends in diagnostics
Increasing testing demand (20% overall, “Angelina Jolie Effect”)
Health budgets under significant pressure
New markers of clinical utility (oncology, cardiology, …)
“Diagnostic odyssey” (e.g. complex disorders, ID)
Emerging Private Market (Wellness Genomes, Direct-to-Consumer)
Internationalisation of testing
Stronger integration between research and diagnostics
NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING
Improve cost-effectiveness
Increase throughput and automation
Improve diagnostic rate
CLINICAL GENOMICS
Faster translation bench to bedside
Community panels in diagnostics
Every exome a research project
Rapidly changing technologies
For our patients and our population
What technology …. panels vs exomes?
For our patients and our population
SEQUENOM
Mass spectro-metry
Parallel Amplificat.
Highly multiplexed
PCR
Hybrid (capture + amplificat.)
Baits to pull down
targets
Hotspots
Full Genes
Throughput
Cost
$ incl. seq. $50 ~$200 $500 $600+ $2500
AMPLICON CAPTURE FLUIDIGM HALOPLEX
For our patients and our population
Panels vs Exomes: a diagnostic viewpoint
Panels Exomes
Cheaper per sample (reagents, labour)
Unified laboratory workflow across applications
Many clinical applications have few defined targets
Complex disorders require broad analysis (ID >600 genes)
Compatible with smaller batch sizes
Ability to expand analysis to additional targets, if required
Manageable data amount (storage, processing)
Variants and copy number at once (!AmpliSeq panels)
Alignment/Variant calling on benchtop sequencer (Accreditation!)
PANELS
Cost and ease of adaptation
Address current needs
EXOMES
Complex disorders
Whole-genomes …
For our patients and our population
Application Company/Product Design
Somatic Cancer Sequenom Illumina TruSeq Ion AmpliSeq HaloPlex NimbleGen
Mass spectrometry Amplicon Amplicon Capture/Amplicon Capture
Familial Cancer Fluidigm Illumina TruSight
Amplicon (BRCA1+2,TP53) Capture (94 genes)
Inherited Disease Ion AmpliSeq Illumina TruSight
Amplicon Capture (552 genes, 2.25Mb)
Cardiomyopathy HaloPlex Illumina TruSight
Capture/Amplicon Capture (46 genes)
Off-the-shelf panels
For our patients and our population
Application Company/Product Design
Somatic Cancer Sequenom Illumina TruSeq Ion AmpliSeq HaloPlex NimbleGen
Mass spectrometry Amplicon Amplicon Capture/Amplicon Capture
Familial Cancer Fluidigm Illumina TruSight
Amplicon (BRCA1+2,TP53) Capture (94 genes)
Inherited Disease Ion AmpliSeq Illumina TruSight
Amplicon Capture (552 genes, 2.25Mb)
Cardiomyopathy HaloPlex Illumina TruSight
Capture/Amplicon Capture (46 genes)
Custom Sequenom Fluidigm Illumina TruSeq Ion AmpliSeq HaloPlex
Mass spectrometry Amplicon Amplicon Amplicon Capture/Amplicon
Off-the-shelf panels
For our patients and our population
So …. with all these tools, why is it still hard?
For our patients and our population
Implementation challenges:
Clinical Services perspective:
• Integration into existing clinical management workflows
• Patient information and consent (esp WES)
• Controversy regarding incidental findings (ACMG guidelines)
• Developing referral mechanisms (which doctor, which
patients, which test)
For our patients and our population
Implementation challenges:
Clinical Services perspective:
• Integration into existing clinical management workflows
• Patient information and consent (esp WES)
• Controversy regarding incidental findings (ACMG guidelines)
• Developing referral mechanisms (which doctor, which
patients, which test)
Strong interest in enhanced testing to support
clinical services
Some concerns regarding increase in workload
For our patients and our population
Implementation challenges:
Diagnostic Laboratory perspective:
• “Commitment issues” (rapidly changing technologies)
• Unclear regulatory context
• Funding! (R&D, new tests, Medicare?)
• Bioinformatics and high performance computing
• Defining useful quality metrics
• Managing data quantity and VOUS
• Standards for clinical annotation, interpretation and reporting
• Staff training and change management
For our patients and our population
Implementation challenges:
Diagnostic Laboratory perspective:
• “Commitment issues” (rapidly changing technologies)
• Unclear regulatory context
• Funding! (R&D, new tests, Medicare?)
• Bioinformatics and high performance computing
• Defining useful quality metrics
• Managing data quantity and VOUS
• Standards for clinical annotation, interpretation and reporting
• Staff training and change management
Enthusiasm to adopt new technologies … BUT
Concerns about increases in workload due to R&D
and data quality
Anxiety around change
For our patients and our population
Implementation challenges:
Diagnostic Laboratory perspective:
• “Commitment issues” (rapidly changing technologies)
• Unclear regulatory context
• Funding! (R&D, new tests, Medicare?)
• Bioinformatics and high performance computing
• Defining useful quality metrics
• Managing data quantity and VOUS
• Clinical annotation, interpretation and reporting
• Staff training and change management
For our patients and our population
1. Bioinformatics and HPC
For our patients and our population
Bioinformatics and HPC
• Limited bioinformatics expertise in many diagnostic labs
• Training of medical scientists in use of software/ NGS data
For our patients and our population
Bioinformatics and HPC
• Limited bioinformatics expertise in many diagnostic labs
• Training of medical scientists in use of software/ NGS data
• Identifying commercial vs in-house software solution
For our patients and our population
Commercial Software
Product Secondary Analysis
Tertiary Analysis
CLC Genomics Workbench x x
NextGENe (Softgenetics) x x
Geneticist Assistant (Softgenetics) x
MiSeq Reporter (Illumina) x
Variant Studio (Illumina) x
Ion Torrent Suite (Life T.) x
Ion Reporter (Life Techn.) x
SureCall (Agilent) x (x)
Alamut HT Cartagenia BenchLabs NGS DNAStart (Lasergene) BioBase Genome Trax …
For our patients and our population
Bioinformatics and HPC
• Limited bioinformatics expertise in many diagnostic labs
• Training of medical scientists in use of software/ NGS data
• Identifying commercial vs in-house software solution
• Integration with existing health IT infrastructure
o Network speed and access
o Data storage and management (across sites)
o Specialised software requirements (64bit, RAM, dedicated server, …)
• IT support for HPC vs outsourcing services
• Negotiating service level agreements and compute requirements
• Risk aversion (managing sensitive patient data)
For our patients and our population
2. Clinical annotation, interpretation, and reporting
For our patients and our population
Example 1: Clear hit
Primary lymphedema
Localized fluid retention and tissue swelling caused by a
compromised lymphatic system
One affected child (affected mother not sequenced)
Expect autosomal dominant
492 non-db SNP variants
Heterozygous GJC2 mutation
Previously described in large independent pedigree
For our patients and our population
Example 2: Multiple hits
Allan-Herndon-Dudley syndrome?
global developmental delay, sensorineural hearing loss,
dystonic dyskinetic posturing, hypotonia, MRI white matter
hypomyelination, hypothyroid with elevated T3.
Previous diagnostic testing of MCT8 negative.
One affected child (affected mother not sequenced)
Expect X-linked
893 non-db SNP variants
Homozyg. SLC16A2 mutation (splice site donor in intron)
OMIM gene for Allan-Herndon-Dudley syndrome
MITF: sensorineural deafness; highly pleiotropic
POU1F1:pituitary hormone deficiency - hypothyroidism
For our patients and our population
Example 3: Further tests
Primary recessive microcephaly? Fanconia syndrome?
Cytomegalovirus infection, anaemia, alpha thalassaemia,
microcephaly, developmental delay, epilepsy, hypertension,
moderate conductive hearing loss
Single affected child
Expect autosomal de novo or recessive
Array CGH normal
>500 non-db SNP variants
Het in FANCA (splice site donor) – pathogenicity?
For our patients and our population
TP53 mutation?
Polymorphic site T>C
Homopolymer (6 Cs)
For our patients and our population
Example 4: Unresolved
Lipofuscinosis? Tay-Sachs disease? Ataxia telang.?
progressive encephalopathy, scleral telangiectasia, axonal
spheroids, and membrane-bound inclusions in skin.
Two affected siblings
Expect autosomal recessive
479 non-db SNP variants
No candidate gene hit
Compound het in SLC5A6 (metabolic transporter protein;
frameshift + missense muts)
Single het in SLC22A1 (spastic paraplegia, neurodegeneration)
For our patients and our population
Emerging issues
Variants of unknown significance (VOUS) time-consuming
How to prove causality?
How many and which annotation resources constitute “best
practise”?
Need for automation of variant filtering and prioritization
For our patients and our population
Emerging issues
Variants of unknown significance (VOUS) time-consuming
How to prove causality?
How many and which annotation resources constitute “best
practise”?
Need for automation of variant filtering and prioritization
Standards for annotation, interpretation and
reporting
RCPA benchmarking datasets
ClinVar
International Collaboration for Clinical Genomics (ICCG)
HGSA, NIH …
For our patients and our population
Diagnostics is becoming interdisciplinary and personal …
For our patients and our population
Biotech
companies Diagnostic
Labs
IT companies
Software
companies
Cluster computing
Cloud computing
Encryption
Clinicians
Researchers
Regulatory
bodies
Guidelines
Accreditation
Professional
societies Guidelines
Training/ Registration
Testing/
Interpretation
Reporting
R&D
Gene/Variant discovery
Test requests
Clinical
management
Pharma
Drug discovery
Clinical trials
An interdisciplinary effort
For our patients and our population
Gene
Discovery
Prevalence
Screen
Diagnostic
Sequencing
Clinical
Validation
New disease gene
Functional studies
Frequency in population
Target population
Implications for disease management
Diagnosis: PPV – NPV
Treatment – Prognosis
Assay development
Patient sequencing
Disease
Management
The research/diagnostic feedback:
SOP
For our patients and our population
Gene
Discovery
Prevalence
Screen
Diagnostic
Sequencing
Clinical
Validation
New disease gene
Functional studies
Frequency in population
Target population
Implications for disease management
Diagnosis: PPV – NPV
Treatment – Prognosis
Assay development
Patient sequencing
Disease
Management
The research/diagnostic feedback:
Single-gene
sequencing
STOP
For our patients and our population
Gene
Discovery
Prevalence
Screen
Diagnostic
Sequencing
Clinical
Validation
New disease gene
Functional studies
Frequency in population
Target population
Implications for disease management
Diagnosis: PPV – NPV
Treatment – Prognosis
Assay development
Patient sequencing
Disease
Management Panels/ Whole-exomes
Build large patient cohorts
Genotype – phenotype r/ships
The research/diagnostic feedback:
For our patients and our population
Gene
Discovery
Prevalence
Screen
Diagnostic
Sequencing
Clinical
Validation
New disease gene
Functional studies
Frequency in population
Target population
Implications for disease management
Diagnosis: PPV – NPV
Treatment – Prognosis
Assay development
Patient sequencing
Disease
Management Panels/ Whole-exomes
Build large patient cohorts
Genotype – phenotype r/ships
The research/diagnostic feedback:
Diagnostics is
becoming
very personal
For our patients and our population
Conclusions
• Diagnostics is changing rapidly
• Moving goal posts
• Implementation challenges
(bioinformatics/ IT; clinical annotation and interpretation)
• Clinical validation studies and health economics…
• Genetic test requests becoming a consultation
• Up-skilling (scientists in medicine and clinicians in technology)
• Interdisciplinary effort and case review teams
• Motivation is clear: improved pick up rate and personalised
medicine
For our patients and our population
Dr Janice Fletcher Dr Glenice Cheetham
Prof Hamish Scott Dr Scott Grist
Sharon Bain Dr Kathie Friend
Mark Holloway Dr Rosa Katsikeros
Karen Ambler Dr Chris Hahn
Dr Connie Caruso Evelyn Douglas
Dr Melanie Hayes Kathie Cox
Rachel Hall Kristian Brion
Amanda Tirimacco
Acknowledgements
SA Pathology and
Clinical Services
ACRF SA Cancer
Genome Facility
Joel Geoghegan
Dr Andreas Schreiber
Mark Van der Hoek
Ming Lin
David Lawrence
Prof Michael Brown
A/Prof Chris Barnett
Prof Eric Hahn
Prof A Ruszkiewicz
Prof Graeme Suthers
Dr Drago Bratkovic
Dr Dylan Mordaunt
Dr Melody Caramins
Prof Jozef Gecz
Dr Mark Corbett
Prof David Adelson
The University of
Adelaide
For our patients and our population
Thank You!
Monday, 2 December Introduction to biology and bioinformatics
Tuesday, 3 December Evolutionary Biology
Wednesday, 4 December Systems Biology
Thursday, 5 December Next Generation Sequencing
Friday, 6 December Programming for bioinformatics
BioInfoSummer 2013 Program
http://www.maths.adelaide.edu.au/biosummer2013/program.html