Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla

download Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla

of 8

Transcript of Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla

  • 8/16/2019 Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla

    1/8

    M A J O R A R T I C L E

    Added Benet of Nucleic Acid Amplication

    Testing for the Diagnosis of  Trichomonasvaginalis Among Men and Women Attending a Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinic

    Christina A. Muzny,1 Reaford J. Blackburn,2 Richard J. Sinsky,3 Erika L. Austin,1 and Jane R. Schwebke1

    1Division of Infectious Diseases,   2Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, and   3Quality, Improvement, and Decision Support,

    Jefferson County Department of Health, Birmingham, Alabama

    (See the Editorial Commentary by Taylor on pages 842–4.)

    Background .   Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) is the most common nonviral sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the

    world. However, TV is not a reportable STI and, with the exception of HIV-positive women, there are no guidelines forscreening in women or men. The objective of this study was to determine the added value of nucleic acid amplication

    tests (NAATs) for detection of TV in men and women at high risk for infection as well as correlates of infection.

     Methods.   This was a review of clinical and laboratory data of men and women presenting to the Jefferson County 

    Department of Health Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) Clinic and receiving a TV NAAT.

    Results.   During 2012–2013, 6335 patients (3821 women and 2514 men) received a TV NAAT on endocervical,

    urethral, or urine specimens. Overall TV prevalence was 20.2%; 27.0% in women and 9.8% in men. Correlates of 

    TV among men included age >40 years, African American race, and  ≥5 polymorphonuclear cells per high-power

    eld on urethral Gram stain. Age >40 years, African American race, leukorrhea on wet mount, elevated vaginal pH,

    positive whiff test, and concurrent gonococcal infection were positively associated with TV among women. TV NAAT

    detected approximately one-third more infections among women than wet mount alone.

    Conclusions.   TV prevalence among men and women was high in this study, suggesting that both groups should be

    routinely screened, including those aged >40 years. Improved detection of TV by routine implementation of NAATsshould result in better control of this common, treatable STI.

    Keywords.   infectiousness; nucleic acid amplication test; sexually transmitted infection;  Trichomonas vaginalis;

    wet mount.

    Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) is the most common non-

     viral sexually transmitted infection (STI) [1]. In the

    United States, incidence in women of reproductive

    age is estimated to be 3–5 million cases annually [2],

    and prevalence among women aged 14–49 years in

    the general population is 3.1% [3]. Risk factors for TV in

    women include older age, African American race, lower

    socioeconomic status, and greater numbers of lifetime

    sexual partners [3–6]. The epidemiology of TV in

    men is less well characterized, as men are not routinely 

    tested due to a previous lack of sensitive and convenient

    testing methodologies. Prior estimates of TV prevalence

    in men have ranged from 3% to 20% depending on the

    presence or absence of urogenital symptoms, geograph-

    ic locale, clinical setting, and method of testing [7–11].

    Limited data suggest that risk factors in men include

    older age and African American race [8, 12].

    Received 3 March 2014; accepted 5 May 2014; electronically published 13 June

    2014.

    Presented in part: University of Alabama at Birmingham Department of MedicineResearch Day, 5 March 2014. Poster presentation 71. University of Alabama at

    Birmingham Health Disparities Research Symposium, 20 March 2014. Oral

    presentation.

    Correspondence: Christina A. Muzny, MD, Division of Infectious Diseases,

    University of Alabama at Birmingham, ZRB 242, 1530 3rd Ave S, Birmingham, AL

    35294  ([email protected]).

    Clinical Infectious Diseases 2014;59(6):834–41

    © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious

    Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail:

    [email protected].

    DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu446

    834   •  CID 2014:59 (15 September)   •  Muzny et al

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • 8/16/2019 Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla

    2/8

    TV has been shown to be associated with increased suscept-

    ibility to human immunodeciency virus (HIV) [13] and ad-

     verse pregnancy outcomes [14]. TV is not a reportable STI;

    with the exception of HIV-positive women [15], there are no

    guidelines for screening in women or men. TV is most fre-

    quently diagnosed by examination of a wet mount of vaginal

    uid, which has a sensitivity of 50%–60% [16, 17]; wet mount

    of urethral secretions in men is less reliable and not routinely 

    practiced [7]. The gold standard for TV diagnosis in womenhas been culture of vaginal   uid, which requires incubation

    and is categorized by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement

    Amendments (CLIA) as moderately complex [18]; the optimal

    site or specimen for diagnosis in men using culture is unknown

    [19]. TV culture is not readily available in clinical settings and

    sensitivity is less compared to the recently available, highly sen-

    sitive nucleic acid amplication test (NAAT) [20]. The TV

    NAAT has been validated in asymptomatic and symptomatic

    women in multiple specimen types [21, 22] and is run on the

    same instrumentation platforms for   Chlamydia trachomatis

    (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) testing [21–23]. Although

    the TV NAAT can be used to test male urethral and urine spec-

    imens, US Food and Drug Administration clearance has not

    been sought for this purpose [23].

    The Jefferson County Department of Health Sexually Trans-

    mitted Diseases (STD) Clinic in Birmingham, Alabama, imple-

    mented routine TV NAAT testing on endocervical, urine, and

    urethral specimens collected from women and men presenting 

    to the clinic in March 2012 (women) and November 2012

    (men). All women have a wet mount of vaginal  uid. Prior to

    implementation of NAAT, no TV testing was available for men,

    as only Gram staining of urethral discharge is performed. Our

    primary objective was to determine the added value of NAATfor TV detection in men and women as well as correlates of in-

    fection. We also sought to compare clinical and laboratory char-

    acteristics of women that were TV wet mount positive, NAAT

    positive with those that were TV wet mount negative, NAAT

    positive, as we sought to develop an algorithm for targeted

    TV NAAT use in women with a negative wet mount for TV.

    METHODS

    This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the

    University of Alabama at Birmingham and by the JeffersonCounty Department of Health. Patients presenting to the STD

    Clinic and receiving a TV NAAT between March 2012 and Sep-

    tember 2013 were identied from the electronic medical record.

    This clinic serves a lower-income, minority (>90% African

    American) population; patients are asked to pay $5 to see a clini-

    cian and receive STI testing. Inclusion criteria included age  ≥16

    years and receipt of a TV NAAT on an endocervical or urine

    specimen between March 2012 and September 2013 (women)

    and on a urethral or urine specimen between November 2012

    and September 2013 (men). Only data from the  rst clinic visit

    per patient during this time frame were reviewed.

    Variables abstracted included age, race, circumcision status,

    urogenital symptoms, and current clinical diagnoses at the

    time of clinic visit: cervicitis, pelvic inammatory disease, bac-

    terial vaginosis (BV) (based on Amsel criteria [24]), and vulvo-

     vaginal candidiasis. Laboratory variables included vaginal pH,

    whiff test (presence of a  shy odor when 10% potassium hy-droxide is added to a sample of vaginal discharge), presence

    of trichomonads, clue cells (squamous epithelial cells coated

    with anaerobic bacteria that have sloughed off from the vaginal

    epithelium), and white blood cells (WBCs) per high-power  eld

    (HPF) on vaginal wet mount (point-of-care test in women),

    number of polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) on urethral

    Gram stain per HPF (point-of-care test in men), and TV, CT,

    and GC NAAT results on endocervical, urethral, or urine spec-

    imens using the Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 assay (Gen-

    Probe, San Diego, California) (send out test, results take 7

    days). It was also noted whether patients with TV were treated

    with metronidazole (provided at no additional charge by the

    clinic and given on site) at the time of their clinic visit on the

    day in which the TV NAAT was obtained, presumably either

    due to a positive wet mount for TV (women), clinical diagnosis

    of BV (women), or because they were a contact to TV (women

    and men). At this clinic, asymptomatic and symptomatic pa-

    tients with a positive TV NAAT are asked to return for treat-

    ment if they had not already received metronidazole on the

    day in which the NAAT was obtained.

    Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12.1 (StataCorp,

    College Station, Texas). The association of demographic and clin-

    ical characteristics with TV infection was examined separately forwomen and men, with logistic regression used to calculate odds

    ratios (ORs) and condence intervals (CIs) in unadjusted and ad-

     justed models. All variables of interest were  rst examined sepa-

    rately in unadjusted models to assess bivariate associations. The

    adjusted models include all variables observed to be signicant at

    P < .05 in the unadjusted analyses.

    RESULTS

    Data were available for 6335 patients: 3821 women and 2514

    men. The majority were aged 25–

    40 years and most (86%)were African American (Table 1). Based on NAAT results, the

    overall prevalence of TV was 1279 of 6335 (20.2%); TV preva-

    lence by sex was 1032 of 3821 (27.0%) among women and 247

    of 2514 (9.8%) among men. TV prevalence by wet mount

    among women was 736 of 3765 (19.6%). This was signicantly 

    lower than the 27.0% prevalence found among women using 

    NAAT (P  < .001), signifying that NAAT detected approximately 

    one-third more infections among women than wet mount.

    Trichomonas vaginalis Molecular Testing   •  CID 2014:59 (15 September)   •   835

  • 8/16/2019 Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla

    3/8

    A total of 3765 women had both wet mount and NAAT re-sults available (wet mount results were not available for 56

    women). Of these women, 317 had discordant results, including 

    301 who were TV negative according to wet mount but TV pos-

    itive according to NAAT (false-negative wet mounts) and 16

    who were TV positive according to wet mount but TV negative

    according to NAAT (false-positive wet mounts). A large pro-

    portion of women testing positive for TV based on wet

    mount (254/736 [34.5%]) (data not shown) and NAAT (375/

    1032 [36.3%]) did not complain of urogenital symptoms.

    Tables 2   and   3  report correlates of TV among men and

    women based on NAAT results. In unadjusted analyses, age(>40 years) and African American race were positively associat-

    ed with TV among both groups. Presence of urogenital symp-

    toms among men at the time of clinic visit was not associated

    with TV; however, women with urogenital symptoms were

    more likely to have TV (OR = 1.28 [95% CI, 1.11–1.49]).

    Women with a clinical diagnosis of BV or vulvovaginal candi-

    diasis were less likely to have TV (OR = 0.69 [95% CI, .58–.82]

    and OR = 0.28 [95% CI, .21–.38], respectively). Neither

    cervicitis nor pelvic inammatory disease was associated with

    TV. Having ≥5 PMNs per HPF on urethral Gram stain (ie, sug-

    gestive of a diagnosis of nongonococcal urethritis [NGU]) at the

    time of the TV NAAT was positively associated with TV in men

    (OR = 2.25 [95% CI, 1.59–3.20]) as was elevated WBCs per HPF

    (ie, leukorrhea) on wet mount for women (OR for WBCs 1–

    10 = 1.71 [95% CI, 1.39–2.09]; OR for WBCs 11–30 = 2.93

    [95% CI, 2.25–3.82]). Elevated vaginal pH  ≥4.5 (OR = 1.85

    [95% CI, 1.52–2.26]) and positive whiff test (OR = 1.31 [95%CI, 1.13–1.51]) were also positively associated with TV among 

    women; however, the presence of clue cells on wet mount was

    not. Among men, concurrent CT was associated with reduced

    likelihood of TV (OR = 0.42 [95% CI, .28–.62]) as was concur-

    rent GC (OR = 0.31 [95% CI, .16–.58]). In contrast, concurrent

    GC was positively associated with an increased likelihood of TV

    among women (OR = 1.62 [95% CI, 1.26–2.08]), although con-

    current CT was not. After adjusting for other signicant vari-

    ables in each of the models for men and women, all correlates

    found to be signicant in unadjusted analyses remained sig-

    nicant in adjusted models (Tables  2  and  3) except for the

    presence of urogenital symptoms in women, which became

    nonsignicant.

    The proportion of women that were TV wet mount negative,

    NAAT positive was 29.5% (301/1021). Table 4 examines clinical

    and laboratory correlates of women with results that were TV

    wet mount negative, NAAT positive. In unadjusted analyses,

    women with urogenital symptoms (OR = 0.73 [95% CI,

    .55–.96]), elevated vaginal pH   ≥4.5 (OR = 0.13 [95% CI,

    .07–.21]), positive whiff test (OR = 0.70 [95% CI, .54–.93]),

    and leukorrhea on wet mount (OR for WBCs 1–10 = 0.37

    [95% CI, .25–.55]; OR for WBCs 11–30 = 0.11 [95% CI,

    .06–.20]) had lower odds of being TV wet mount negative,NAAT positive. Conversely, women with concurrent GC had

    increased odds of having results that were TV wet mount neg-

    ative, NAAT positive (OR = 2.08 [95% CI, 1.39–3.13]). After ad-

     justing for all signicant correlates in the unadjusted models,

    both urogenital symptoms and whiff test positivity failed to

    maintain signicance in the adjusted model.

    Of those men and women with positive TV NAAT results,

    148 of 247 (59.9%) men and 863 of 1032 (83.6%) women

    were treated with metronidazole at the time of their initial clinic

     visit (data not shown).

    DISCUSSION

    This is one of the  rst studies to report TV prevalence and cor-

    relates of infection among men and women attending an STD

    clinic in which a TV NAAT was obtained during routine care.

    In this relatively large clinic population, TV prevalence (based

    on NAAT) was 27.0% in women and 9.8% in men. This prev-

    alence in women is signicantly higher than the 3.2% (as

    Table 1. Characteristics and Prevalence of   Trichomonas vaginalis  (TV) Infection Among Patients Undergoing TV NucleicAcid Amplication Testing (N = 6335)

    Characteristic

    Women

    (n = 3821)

    TV Prevalence

    Among

    Women

    Men

    (n = 2514)

    TV Prevalence

    Among Men

    Age, y

    40 618 (16.2) 211 (34.1) 520 (20.7) 84 (16.1)

    Race/ethnicitya

    AfricanAmerican

    3286 (86.0) 957 (29.1) 2159 (85.8) 236 (10.9)

    White 439 (11.5) 73 (16.7) 257 (10.2) 10 (3.9)

    Hispanic/ Latino

    73 (1.9) 1 (1.4) 88 (3.5) 1 (1.1)

    Other 23 (0.6) 1 (4.2) 10 (0.4) 0 (0.0)

    Overall TV prevalence

    TV NAATb 1032 (27.0) 247 (9.8)

    Wet mount 736 (19.6) NA

    Data are presented as No. (%). Patients were seen at the Jefferson County

    Department of Health Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinic, Birmingham,

    Alabama, March 2012 to September 2013.

    Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; NAAT, nucleic acid amplification test; TV,

    Trichomonas vaginalis .a

    Patients reporting Hispanic/Latino ethnicity are included in that category only.

    Other race/ethnicity includes American Indian or Alaska Native (n = 5), Asian

    (n = 14), Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (n = 4), multiple races

    (n = 9), or unreported/refused to answer (n = 21).b Diagnosed by NAAT on urethral or urine specimens for men and endocervical

    or urine specimens for women. Overall prevalence of TV infection among all

    patients in the sample was 20.2%.

    836   •  CID 2014:59 (15 September)   •  Muzny et al

  • 8/16/2019 Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla

    4/8

    determined by polymerase chain reaction) reported in the

    2001–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 

    (NHANES), the most recent study of TV prevalence in the

    United States [25]. It is also higher than in other STD clinic

    populations (2%–18%) [26–29], including previous studies per-

    formed at this clinic using wet mount [20]. This is likely due to

    the improved sensitivity of NAAT compared with other diag-

    nostic methods. Using data collected from 15 STD clinics,Meites et al found that TV prevalence (determined by wet

    mount, culture, NAAT, or any other type of test) among symp-

    tomatic women was 26.2% [30]. TV prevalence among women

    in our study (27.0%) was similar but included both sympto-

    matic and asymptomatic women. The lower TV prevalence

    found among men in our study, compared with women, is likely 

    inuenced by the high rate (36%–69%) of spontaneous resolu-

    tion of TV that is known to occur in men [19, 31]. Prevalence of 

    TV based on wet mount among women was 19.6%, suggesting 

    that TV would have gone undiagnosed in approximately one-

    third of infected women had NAAT not been performed.Correlates of TV among men and women based on NAAT

    included age (>40 years) and African American race, similar

    to previous studies [3–5, 8, 12]. Unlike CT and GC [32], older

    age is a signicant risk factor for TV in men and women [4],

    perhaps due to accumulating infections caused by lack of detec-

    tion. Potential reasons for the racial disparity have been previ-

    ously discussed [5], although the fact that the majority of 

    patients seen in our clinic are of African American race may 

    have also inuenced this   nding. Among men, having   ≥5

    PMNs per HPF (suggestive of NGU) on urethral Gram stain

    was also correlated with TV; TV is known to be an important

    cause of NGU [19]. Additional correlates of TV among women

    included leukorrhea on wet mount, similar to that noted by Laz-

    enby et al [33], elevated vaginal pH (TV prefers a high pH for

    optimal growth) [18], positive whiff test, and concurrent gono-

    coccal infection. Among men and women with a positive TVNAAT, 40.1% of men and 16.4% of women had not been treated

    with metronidazole at the time of their initial clinic visit, signi-

    fying missed opportunities for treatment.

    It is noteworthy that the presence of urogenital symptoms

    among men and women was not correlated with TV. This is

    consistent with the  ndings of Nye et al, which showed that

    no symptoms were specic for any positive TV test [20]. In ad-

    dition, similar to others [20], the results of our study suggest

    that TV can often be a subclinical infection, as approximately 

    one-third of women with TV-positive results based on wet

    mount and one-third of women with TV-positive resultsbased on NAAT did not complain of urogenital symptoms at

    the time of their clinic visit.

    We also found that TV was not associated with BV among 

    women. It has been suggested that TV may alter the vaginal mi-

    crobiota in a manner that is favorable to its survival and trans-

    missibility [34]. Hillier et al found that pregnant women with

    intermediate Nugent scores [35] had the highest prevalence of 

    TV [36]. Martin et al corroborated this nding in a subset of 394

    Table 2. Correlates of Trichomonas vaginalis   (TV) Infection Among Men Undergoing TV Nucleic Acid Amplication Testing (n = 2514)

    Characteristic

    TV Negative

    (n = 2267)

    TV Positivea

    (n= 247)

    Unadjusted OR

    (95% CI)   P  Value

    Adjusted OR

    (95% CI)   P  Value

    Age, y

  • 8/16/2019 Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla

    5/8

    nonpregnant women [34] whereas Brotman et al have shown

    that intermediate vaginal  ora or BV (based on Nugent score)

    at a prior visit is associated with 1.5- to 2-fold increased risk for

    incident TV among a cohort of 3620 nonpregnant women [37].

    In vitro data suggest that TV grows better in an elevated pH

    [38]; BV can provide this high-pH environment. TV itself 

    may also be able to manipulate the vaginal environment and

    promote changes in the vaginal   ora, leading to an elevated

    pH. Indeed, the majority of women (82.9%) testing positivefor TV (based on NAAT) in our study had an elevated vaginal

    pH (Table 3). Although a clinical diagnosis of BV was not cor-

    related with TV, it would have been of interest to look at the dis-

    tribution of Nugent scores among women testing TV positive to

    see if they were in the abnormal range. However, we did not

    have these data available.

    An unexpected   nding was that concurrent CT and GC

    were associated with reduced likelihood of TV among men.

    Explanations for this are unknown, although it could be related

    to cumulative asymptomatic infection caused by TV in men as

    opposed to symptomatic infection with CT or GC whereby men

    would actively seek care at an STD clinic. Indeed, only 72 of 247

    (29.1%) of men in this study positive for TV by NAAT had

    complaints of urogenital symptoms (Table  2). Unfortunately,

    we did not have the data available to know whether or not

    men testing positive for TV reported being a contact to TV

    upon presenting to the clinic; however, the fact that 59.5%were treated with metronidazole at the time of their visit

    strongly suggests this. Conversely, concurrent GC was positively 

    associated with increased likelihood of TV among women. It

    has been reported that TV is associated with GC in women

    8%–50% of the time and that GC prevalence is 1.4–1.9 times

    higher in women with TV than in women without TV [39].

    This correlation between TV and GC has also been noted by 

    Lossick in a study of 3507 TV cases [40] and Lazenby et al in

    Table 3. Correlates of Trichomonas vaginalis  (TV) Infection Among Women Undergoing TV Nucleic Acid Amplication Testing (n = 3821)

    Characteristic

    TV Negative

    (n = 2789)

    TV Positivea

    (n = 1032)

    Unadjusted OR

    (95% CI)   P  Value

    Adjusted OR

    (95% CI)   P  Value

    Age, y

  • 8/16/2019 Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla

    6/8

    a study of 294 women, of whom 16% had TV [ 33]. Similar toour results, a correlation between TV and CT has not been

    noted in prior studies [40]. The biologic and/or social differenc-

    es that account for these  ndings are unknown. It could be hy-

    pothesized that the demographic pool of CT infections among 

    women may be more diffuse than the pool of TV/GC infections

    and that risk factors for acquiring CT are different than those

    for acquiring TV/GC [40].

    We originally hypothesized that women with TV wet mount–

    negative, NAAT-positive results would have a lower burden of 

    disease due to TV and be less likely to have urogenital symptoms,

    elevated vaginal pH, and leukorrhea on wet mount than womenwith TV wet mount–positive, NAAT-positive results. The results

    of our study are somewhat consistent with this as women with an

    elevated vaginal pH and leukorrhea had lower odds of having re-

    sults that were TV wet mount negative, NAAT positive. Women

    with urogenital symptoms initially also had a lower odds of hav-

    ing TV wet mount–negative, NAAT-positive results, although

    this nding lost its signicance in adjusted analysis. Only concur-

    rent gonococcal infection was found to be signicantly correlated

    with TV wet mount negativity, NAAT positivity. The biologicbasis for this unexpected  nding is unknown. In terms of algo-

    rithmic testing, the results of our study suggest that patients

    with an elevated pH and leukorrhea on wet mount should be

    evaluated with a more sensitive TV diagnostic test, preferably 

    NAAT, particularly if microscopy is negative for TV. Clearly,

    all STD clinic clients should be screened for TV and reex testing 

    in general; that is, NAATs (particularly if wet mount is negative),

    could be used as a cost-saving measure.

    Our study has several limitations. First, data were collected

    retrospectively, limiting the amount of sexual history (including 

    reason for clinic visit), clinical diagnosis, and laboratory data(including HIV testing results) able to be extracted. Because

    of this, there may be additional correlates of TV not identied

    here. Second, the results of this study were obtained from one

    STD clinic in the southern United States and may not be gen-

    eralizable to other clinical settings. Additionally, as only data

    from the   rst clinic visit per patient during the study time

    frame was reviewed, we were unable to determine whether

    men and women with TV had a new infection vs a persistent

    Table 4. Comparison of Wet Mount Positivity/Negativity With Positive Nucleic Acid Amplication Test for   Trichomonas vaginalis (n = 1021 Women Positive)a

    Characteristic

    TV Wet Mount−

    (n= 301)

    TV Wet Mount+

    (n= 720)

    TV-, Wet Mount/TV+

    NAAT, Unadjusted

    OR (95% CI)   P  Value

    TV- Wet Mount/TV+

    NAAT, Adjusted

    OR (95% CI)   P  Value

    Urogenital symptomsb 176 (58.5) 473 (65.7) 0.73 (.55–.96) .03 1.00 (.72–1.38) .98

    Current laboratory diagnosis

    Vaginal pHc

  • 8/16/2019 Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla

    7/8

    or recurrent infection. Because of this, we were also unable to

    determine the exact percentage of patients with a positive TV

    NAAT who received treatment with metronidazole as we only 

    had data available from the clinic visit on the day in which

    the NAAT was obtained.

    Nevertheless, this study demonstrates that routine imple-

    mentation of TV NAAT at our STD clinic was able to detect

    a signicant proportion of infected male and female patients,

    signicantly higher than that detected by wet mount alone inwomen. The TV NAAT can easily be implemented in clinical

    settings as it can be run on the same instrumentation platforms

    available for CT and GC testing. Improved detection of TV by 

    implementation of NAAT in men and women of all age groups

    should be considered, as it will likely result in better control of 

    this common, treatable STI.

    Notes

     Acknowledgm ents.   The authors thank Edwin Swiatlo, MD, PhD, for

    helpful discussions on manuscript preparation.

    Financial support.   C. A. M. is supported in part by a developmental

    grant from the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association.

    Potential con  icts of interest.   J. R. S. has been a consultant for and re-

    ceived research support from Hologic/GenProbe, BD Diagnostics, Cepheid,

    and Embil Pharmaceuticals. All other authors report no potential conicts.

    All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential

    Conicts of Interest. Conicts that the editors consider relevant to the con-

    tent of the manuscript have been disclosed.

    References

    1. World Health Organization. Global prevalence and incidence of select-

    ed curable sexually transmitted infections,  2001. Available at:  http://

    www.who.int/hiv/pub/sti/who_hiv_aids_2001.02.pdf . Accessed 14 Jan-

    uary 2014.

    2. Cates W Jr. Estimates of the incidence and prevalence of sexually trans-mitted diseases in the United States. American Social Health Associa-

    tion Panel. Sex Transm Dis  1999; 26(suppl 4):S2–7.

    3. Sutton M, Sternberg M, Koumans EH, et al. The prevalence of  Tricho-

    monas vaginalis infection among reproductive-age women in the Unit-

    ed States, 2001–2004. Clin Infect Dis  2007; 45:1319–26.

    4. Ginocchio CC, Chapin K, Smith JS, et al. Prevalence of  Trichomonas

    vaginalis  and coinfection with   Chlamydia trachomatis  and  Neisseria

     gonorrhoeae in the United States as determined by the Aptima Tricho-

    monas vaginalis nucleic acid amplication assay. J Clin Microbiol 2012;

    50:2601–8.

    5. Sorvillo F, Smith L, Kerndt P, et al.  Trichomonas vaginalis, HIV, and

    African-Americans. Emerg Infect Dis  2001; 7:927–32.

    6. Sutcliffe S, Newman SB, Hardick A, et al. Prevalence and correlates of 

    Trichomonas vaginalis   infection among female US federal prison in-

    mates. Sex Transm Dis  2010; 37:585–90.7. Hobbs MM, Kazembe P, Reed AW, et al.  Trichomonas vaginalis  as a

    cause of urethritis in Malawian men. Sex Transm Dis  1999; 26:381–7.

    8. Joyner JL, Douglas JM Jr, Ragsdale S. Comparative prevalence of infec-

    tion with Trichomonas vaginalis among men attending a sexually trans-

    mitted diseases clinic. Sex Transm Dis  2000; 27:236–40.

    9. Borchardt KA, al-Haraci S, Maida N. Prevalence of  Trichomonas vagi-

    nalis  in a male sexually transmitted disease clinic population by inter-

     view, wet mount microscopy, and the InPouch TV test. Genitourin Med

    1995; 71:405–6.

    10. Kaydos-Daniels SC, Miller WC, Hoffman I, et al. The use of specimens

    from various genitourinary sites in men, to detect  Trichomonas vagina-

    lis infection. J Infect Dis 2004; 189:1926–31.

    11. Krieger JN, Jenny C, Verdon M, et al. Clinical manifestations of tricho-

    moniasis in men. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118:844–9.

    12. Gaydos CA, Barnes MR, Quinn N, et al. Trichomonas vaginalis infection

    in men who submit self-collected penile swabs after internet recruit-

    ment. Sex Transm Infect  2013; 89:504–8.

    13. McClelland RS, Sangare L, Hassan WM, et al. Infection with Trichomo-

    nas vaginalis increases the risk of HIV-1 acquisition. J Infect Dis  2007;

    195:698–702.

    14. Cotch MF, Pastorek JG II, Nugent RP, et al.  Trichomonas vaginalis  as-

    sociated with low birth weight and preterm delivery. The Vaginal Infec-

    tions and Prematurity Study Group. Sex Transm Dis  1997; 24:353–60.

    15. Workowski KA, Berman S; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. MMWR Re-

    comm Rep 2010; 59:1–110.

    16. Krieger JN, Tam MR, Stevens CE, et al. Diagnosis of trichomoniasis.

    Comparison of conventional wet-mount examination with cytologic

    studies, cultures, and monoclonal antibody staining of direct specimens.

    JAMA 1988; 259:1223–7.

    17. Huppert JS, Mortensen JE, Reed JL, et al. Rapid antigen testing com-

    pares favorably with transcription-mediated amplication assay for

    the detection of  Trichomonas vaginalis   in young women. Clin Infect

    Dis  2007; 45:194–8.

    18. Hobbs MM, Sena AC, Swygard H, et al.   Trichomonas vaginalis  an dtrichomoniasis. In: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Stamm WE, et al., eds.

    Sexually transmitted diseases. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill,

    2008:771–93.

    19. Krieger JN, Verdon M, Siegel N, et al. Natural history of urogenital

    trichomoniasis in men. J Urol 1993; 149:1455–8.

    20. Nye MB, Schwebke JR, Body BA. Comparison of APTIMATrichomonas

    vaginalis   transcription-mediated amplication to wet mount

    microscopy, culture, and polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of 

    trichomoniasis in men and women. Am J Obstet Gynecol  2009; 200:

    188. e1–7.

    21. Schwebke JR, Hobbs MM, Taylor SN, et al. Molecular testing for Trich-

    omonas vaginalis in women: results from a prospective U.S. clinical trial.

    J Clin Microbiol  2011; 49:4106–11.

    22. Van Der Pol B, Williams JA, Taylor SN, et al.  Trichomonas vaginalis

    DNA detection using self-obtained vaginal swabs with the BD ProbeTecQx Assay on the BD Viper System. J Clin Microbiol  2014; 52:885–9.

    23. BachmannLH, Hobbs MM,SenaAC,et al.Trichomonas vaginalisgenital

    infections: progress and challenges. Clin Infect Dis  2011; 53(suppl 3):

    S160–72.

    24. Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, et al. Nonspecic vaginitis. Diagnostic

    criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med  1983;

    74:14–22.

    25. Allsworth JE, Ratner JA, Peipert JF. Trichomoniasis and other sexually 

    transmitted infections: results from the 2001–2004 National Health and

    Nutrition Examination Surveys. Sex Transm Dis  2009; 36:738–44.

    26. Divekar AA, Gogate AS, Shivkar LK, et al. Disease prevalence in women

    attending the STD clinic in Mumbai (formerly Bombay), India. Int J

    STD AIDS  2000; 11:45–8.

    27. Lo M, Reid M, Brokenshire M. Epidemiological features of women with

    trichomoniasis in Auckland sexual health clinics: 1998–99. N Z Med J2002; 115:U119.

    28. Swygard H, Sena AC, Hobbs MM, et al. Trichomoniasis: clinical man-

    ifestations, diagnosis and management. Sex Transm Infect   2004;

    80:91–5.

    29. Garland SM, Tabrizi SN, Chen S, et al. Prevalence of sexually transmit-

    ted infections (Neisseria gonorrhoeae,  Chlamydia trachomatis,  Tricho-

    monas vaginalis, and human papillomavirus) in female attendees of a

    sexually transmitted diseases clinic in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Infect

    Dis Obstet Gynecol  2001; 9:143–6.

    840   •  CID 2014:59 (15 September)   •  Muzny et al

    http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/sti/who_hiv_aids_2001.02.pdfhttp://www.who.int/hiv/pub/sti/who_hiv_aids_2001.02.pdfhttp://www.who.int/hiv/pub/sti/who_hiv_aids_2001.02.pdfhttp://www.who.int/hiv/pub/sti/who_hiv_aids_2001.02.pdfhttp://www.who.int/hiv/pub/sti/who_hiv_aids_2001.02.pdf

  • 8/16/2019 Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla

    8/8

    30. Meites E, Llata E, Braxton J, et al. Trichomonas vaginalis in selected U.S.

    sexually transmitted disease clinics: testing, screening, and prevalence.

    Sex Transm Dis  2013; 40:865–9.

    31. Schwebke JR, Rompalo A, Taylor S, et al. Re-evaluating the treatment of 

    nongonococcal urethritis: emphasizing emerging pathogens—a ran-

    domized clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis  2011; 52:163–70.

    32. Datta SD, Sternberg M, Johnson RE, et al. Gonorrhea and chlamydia in

    the United States among persons 14 to 39 years of age, 1999 to 2002.

    Ann Intern Med  2007; 147:89–96.

    33. Lazenby GB, Soper DE, Nolte FS. Correlation of leukorrhea and Trich-

    omonas vaginalis  infection. J Clin Microbiol  2013; 51:2323–7.

    34. Martin DH, Zozaya M, Lillis RA, et al. Unique vaginal microbiota that

    includes an unknown  Mycoplasma-like organism is associated with

    Trichomonas vaginalis infection. J Infect Dis 2013; 207:1922–31.

    35. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial

     vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of Gram stain interpre-

    tation. J Clin Microbiol  1991; 29:297–301.

    36. Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Nugent RP, et al. Characteristics of three vaginal

    ora patterns assessed by Gram stain among pregnant women. Vaginal

    Infections and Prematurity Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol  1992;

    166:938–44.

    37. Brotman RM, Klebanoff MA, Nansel TR, et al. Bacterial vaginosis as-

    sessed by gram stain and diminished colonization resistance to incident

    gonococcal, chlamydial, and trichomonal genital infection. J Infect Dis

    2010; 202:1907–15.

    38. McGrory T, Meysick K, Lemchuk-Favel LT, et al. The interaction of  Lac-

    tobacillus acidophilus  and   Trichomonas vaginalis   in vitro. J Parasitol

    1994; 80:50–4.

    39. Rein MF, Muller M. Trichomonas vaginalis. In: Holmes KK, Mardh PA,

    Sparling PF, Weisner PJ, eds. Sexually transmitted diseases. New York:

    McGraw-Hill, 1984: 525–35.

    40. Lossick JG. Epidemiology of urogenital trichomoniasis. In: Honigberg 

    BM, ed. Trichomonads parasitic in humans. New York: Springer-

    Verlag, 1989:311–23.

    Trichomonas vaginalis Molecular Testing   •  CID 2014:59 (15 September)   •   841