Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla
-
Upload
wajarsiihpratamii -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla
-
8/16/2019 Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla
1/8
M A J O R A R T I C L E
Added Benet of Nucleic Acid Amplication
Testing for the Diagnosis of Trichomonasvaginalis Among Men and Women Attending a Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinic
Christina A. Muzny,1 Reaford J. Blackburn,2 Richard J. Sinsky,3 Erika L. Austin,1 and Jane R. Schwebke1
1Division of Infectious Diseases, 2Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, and 3Quality, Improvement, and Decision Support,
Jefferson County Department of Health, Birmingham, Alabama
(See the Editorial Commentary by Taylor on pages 842–4.)
Background . Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) is the most common nonviral sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the
world. However, TV is not a reportable STI and, with the exception of HIV-positive women, there are no guidelines forscreening in women or men. The objective of this study was to determine the added value of nucleic acid amplication
tests (NAATs) for detection of TV in men and women at high risk for infection as well as correlates of infection.
Methods. This was a review of clinical and laboratory data of men and women presenting to the Jefferson County
Department of Health Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) Clinic and receiving a TV NAAT.
Results. During 2012–2013, 6335 patients (3821 women and 2514 men) received a TV NAAT on endocervical,
urethral, or urine specimens. Overall TV prevalence was 20.2%; 27.0% in women and 9.8% in men. Correlates of
TV among men included age >40 years, African American race, and ≥5 polymorphonuclear cells per high-power
eld on urethral Gram stain. Age >40 years, African American race, leukorrhea on wet mount, elevated vaginal pH,
positive whiff test, and concurrent gonococcal infection were positively associated with TV among women. TV NAAT
detected approximately one-third more infections among women than wet mount alone.
Conclusions. TV prevalence among men and women was high in this study, suggesting that both groups should be
routinely screened, including those aged >40 years. Improved detection of TV by routine implementation of NAATsshould result in better control of this common, treatable STI.
Keywords. infectiousness; nucleic acid amplication test; sexually transmitted infection; Trichomonas vaginalis;
wet mount.
Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) is the most common non-
viral sexually transmitted infection (STI) [1]. In the
United States, incidence in women of reproductive
age is estimated to be 3–5 million cases annually [2],
and prevalence among women aged 14–49 years in
the general population is 3.1% [3]. Risk factors for TV in
women include older age, African American race, lower
socioeconomic status, and greater numbers of lifetime
sexual partners [3–6]. The epidemiology of TV in
men is less well characterized, as men are not routinely
tested due to a previous lack of sensitive and convenient
testing methodologies. Prior estimates of TV prevalence
in men have ranged from 3% to 20% depending on the
presence or absence of urogenital symptoms, geograph-
ic locale, clinical setting, and method of testing [7–11].
Limited data suggest that risk factors in men include
older age and African American race [8, 12].
Received 3 March 2014; accepted 5 May 2014; electronically published 13 June
2014.
Presented in part: University of Alabama at Birmingham Department of MedicineResearch Day, 5 March 2014. Poster presentation 71. University of Alabama at
Birmingham Health Disparities Research Symposium, 20 March 2014. Oral
presentation.
Correspondence: Christina A. Muzny, MD, Division of Infectious Diseases,
University of Alabama at Birmingham, ZRB 242, 1530 3rd Ave S, Birmingham, AL
35294 ([email protected]).
Clinical Infectious Diseases 2014;59(6):834–41
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious
Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail:
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu446
834 • CID 2014:59 (15 September) • Muzny et al
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
-
8/16/2019 Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla
2/8
TV has been shown to be associated with increased suscept-
ibility to human immunodeciency virus (HIV) [13] and ad-
verse pregnancy outcomes [14]. TV is not a reportable STI;
with the exception of HIV-positive women [15], there are no
guidelines for screening in women or men. TV is most fre-
quently diagnosed by examination of a wet mount of vaginal
uid, which has a sensitivity of 50%–60% [16, 17]; wet mount
of urethral secretions in men is less reliable and not routinely
practiced [7]. The gold standard for TV diagnosis in womenhas been culture of vaginal uid, which requires incubation
and is categorized by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement
Amendments (CLIA) as moderately complex [18]; the optimal
site or specimen for diagnosis in men using culture is unknown
[19]. TV culture is not readily available in clinical settings and
sensitivity is less compared to the recently available, highly sen-
sitive nucleic acid amplication test (NAAT) [20]. The TV
NAAT has been validated in asymptomatic and symptomatic
women in multiple specimen types [21, 22] and is run on the
same instrumentation platforms for Chlamydia trachomatis
(CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) testing [21–23]. Although
the TV NAAT can be used to test male urethral and urine spec-
imens, US Food and Drug Administration clearance has not
been sought for this purpose [23].
The Jefferson County Department of Health Sexually Trans-
mitted Diseases (STD) Clinic in Birmingham, Alabama, imple-
mented routine TV NAAT testing on endocervical, urine, and
urethral specimens collected from women and men presenting
to the clinic in March 2012 (women) and November 2012
(men). All women have a wet mount of vaginal uid. Prior to
implementation of NAAT, no TV testing was available for men,
as only Gram staining of urethral discharge is performed. Our
primary objective was to determine the added value of NAATfor TV detection in men and women as well as correlates of in-
fection. We also sought to compare clinical and laboratory char-
acteristics of women that were TV wet mount positive, NAAT
positive with those that were TV wet mount negative, NAAT
positive, as we sought to develop an algorithm for targeted
TV NAAT use in women with a negative wet mount for TV.
METHODS
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the
University of Alabama at Birmingham and by the JeffersonCounty Department of Health. Patients presenting to the STD
Clinic and receiving a TV NAAT between March 2012 and Sep-
tember 2013 were identied from the electronic medical record.
This clinic serves a lower-income, minority (>90% African
American) population; patients are asked to pay $5 to see a clini-
cian and receive STI testing. Inclusion criteria included age ≥16
years and receipt of a TV NAAT on an endocervical or urine
specimen between March 2012 and September 2013 (women)
and on a urethral or urine specimen between November 2012
and September 2013 (men). Only data from the rst clinic visit
per patient during this time frame were reviewed.
Variables abstracted included age, race, circumcision status,
urogenital symptoms, and current clinical diagnoses at the
time of clinic visit: cervicitis, pelvic inammatory disease, bac-
terial vaginosis (BV) (based on Amsel criteria [24]), and vulvo-
vaginal candidiasis. Laboratory variables included vaginal pH,
whiff test (presence of a shy odor when 10% potassium hy-droxide is added to a sample of vaginal discharge), presence
of trichomonads, clue cells (squamous epithelial cells coated
with anaerobic bacteria that have sloughed off from the vaginal
epithelium), and white blood cells (WBCs) per high-power eld
(HPF) on vaginal wet mount (point-of-care test in women),
number of polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) on urethral
Gram stain per HPF (point-of-care test in men), and TV, CT,
and GC NAAT results on endocervical, urethral, or urine spec-
imens using the Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 assay (Gen-
Probe, San Diego, California) (send out test, results take 7
days). It was also noted whether patients with TV were treated
with metronidazole (provided at no additional charge by the
clinic and given on site) at the time of their clinic visit on the
day in which the TV NAAT was obtained, presumably either
due to a positive wet mount for TV (women), clinical diagnosis
of BV (women), or because they were a contact to TV (women
and men). At this clinic, asymptomatic and symptomatic pa-
tients with a positive TV NAAT are asked to return for treat-
ment if they had not already received metronidazole on the
day in which the NAAT was obtained.
Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12.1 (StataCorp,
College Station, Texas). The association of demographic and clin-
ical characteristics with TV infection was examined separately forwomen and men, with logistic regression used to calculate odds
ratios (ORs) and condence intervals (CIs) in unadjusted and ad-
justed models. All variables of interest were rst examined sepa-
rately in unadjusted models to assess bivariate associations. The
adjusted models include all variables observed to be signicant at
P < .05 in the unadjusted analyses.
RESULTS
Data were available for 6335 patients: 3821 women and 2514
men. The majority were aged 25–
40 years and most (86%)were African American (Table 1). Based on NAAT results, the
overall prevalence of TV was 1279 of 6335 (20.2%); TV preva-
lence by sex was 1032 of 3821 (27.0%) among women and 247
of 2514 (9.8%) among men. TV prevalence by wet mount
among women was 736 of 3765 (19.6%). This was signicantly
lower than the 27.0% prevalence found among women using
NAAT (P < .001), signifying that NAAT detected approximately
one-third more infections among women than wet mount.
Trichomonas vaginalis Molecular Testing • CID 2014:59 (15 September) • 835
-
8/16/2019 Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla
3/8
A total of 3765 women had both wet mount and NAAT re-sults available (wet mount results were not available for 56
women). Of these women, 317 had discordant results, including
301 who were TV negative according to wet mount but TV pos-
itive according to NAAT (false-negative wet mounts) and 16
who were TV positive according to wet mount but TV negative
according to NAAT (false-positive wet mounts). A large pro-
portion of women testing positive for TV based on wet
mount (254/736 [34.5%]) (data not shown) and NAAT (375/
1032 [36.3%]) did not complain of urogenital symptoms.
Tables 2 and 3 report correlates of TV among men and
women based on NAAT results. In unadjusted analyses, age(>40 years) and African American race were positively associat-
ed with TV among both groups. Presence of urogenital symp-
toms among men at the time of clinic visit was not associated
with TV; however, women with urogenital symptoms were
more likely to have TV (OR = 1.28 [95% CI, 1.11–1.49]).
Women with a clinical diagnosis of BV or vulvovaginal candi-
diasis were less likely to have TV (OR = 0.69 [95% CI, .58–.82]
and OR = 0.28 [95% CI, .21–.38], respectively). Neither
cervicitis nor pelvic inammatory disease was associated with
TV. Having ≥5 PMNs per HPF on urethral Gram stain (ie, sug-
gestive of a diagnosis of nongonococcal urethritis [NGU]) at the
time of the TV NAAT was positively associated with TV in men
(OR = 2.25 [95% CI, 1.59–3.20]) as was elevated WBCs per HPF
(ie, leukorrhea) on wet mount for women (OR for WBCs 1–
10 = 1.71 [95% CI, 1.39–2.09]; OR for WBCs 11–30 = 2.93
[95% CI, 2.25–3.82]). Elevated vaginal pH ≥4.5 (OR = 1.85
[95% CI, 1.52–2.26]) and positive whiff test (OR = 1.31 [95%CI, 1.13–1.51]) were also positively associated with TV among
women; however, the presence of clue cells on wet mount was
not. Among men, concurrent CT was associated with reduced
likelihood of TV (OR = 0.42 [95% CI, .28–.62]) as was concur-
rent GC (OR = 0.31 [95% CI, .16–.58]). In contrast, concurrent
GC was positively associated with an increased likelihood of TV
among women (OR = 1.62 [95% CI, 1.26–2.08]), although con-
current CT was not. After adjusting for other signicant vari-
ables in each of the models for men and women, all correlates
found to be signicant in unadjusted analyses remained sig-
nicant in adjusted models (Tables 2 and 3) except for the
presence of urogenital symptoms in women, which became
nonsignicant.
The proportion of women that were TV wet mount negative,
NAAT positive was 29.5% (301/1021). Table 4 examines clinical
and laboratory correlates of women with results that were TV
wet mount negative, NAAT positive. In unadjusted analyses,
women with urogenital symptoms (OR = 0.73 [95% CI,
.55–.96]), elevated vaginal pH ≥4.5 (OR = 0.13 [95% CI,
.07–.21]), positive whiff test (OR = 0.70 [95% CI, .54–.93]),
and leukorrhea on wet mount (OR for WBCs 1–10 = 0.37
[95% CI, .25–.55]; OR for WBCs 11–30 = 0.11 [95% CI,
.06–.20]) had lower odds of being TV wet mount negative,NAAT positive. Conversely, women with concurrent GC had
increased odds of having results that were TV wet mount neg-
ative, NAAT positive (OR = 2.08 [95% CI, 1.39–3.13]). After ad-
justing for all signicant correlates in the unadjusted models,
both urogenital symptoms and whiff test positivity failed to
maintain signicance in the adjusted model.
Of those men and women with positive TV NAAT results,
148 of 247 (59.9%) men and 863 of 1032 (83.6%) women
were treated with metronidazole at the time of their initial clinic
visit (data not shown).
DISCUSSION
This is one of the rst studies to report TV prevalence and cor-
relates of infection among men and women attending an STD
clinic in which a TV NAAT was obtained during routine care.
In this relatively large clinic population, TV prevalence (based
on NAAT) was 27.0% in women and 9.8% in men. This prev-
alence in women is signicantly higher than the 3.2% (as
Table 1. Characteristics and Prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) Infection Among Patients Undergoing TV NucleicAcid Amplication Testing (N = 6335)
Characteristic
Women
(n = 3821)
TV Prevalence
Among
Women
Men
(n = 2514)
TV Prevalence
Among Men
Age, y
40 618 (16.2) 211 (34.1) 520 (20.7) 84 (16.1)
Race/ethnicitya
AfricanAmerican
3286 (86.0) 957 (29.1) 2159 (85.8) 236 (10.9)
White 439 (11.5) 73 (16.7) 257 (10.2) 10 (3.9)
Hispanic/ Latino
73 (1.9) 1 (1.4) 88 (3.5) 1 (1.1)
Other 23 (0.6) 1 (4.2) 10 (0.4) 0 (0.0)
Overall TV prevalence
TV NAATb 1032 (27.0) 247 (9.8)
Wet mount 736 (19.6) NA
Data are presented as No. (%). Patients were seen at the Jefferson County
Department of Health Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinic, Birmingham,
Alabama, March 2012 to September 2013.
Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; NAAT, nucleic acid amplification test; TV,
Trichomonas vaginalis .a
Patients reporting Hispanic/Latino ethnicity are included in that category only.
Other race/ethnicity includes American Indian or Alaska Native (n = 5), Asian
(n = 14), Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (n = 4), multiple races
(n = 9), or unreported/refused to answer (n = 21).b Diagnosed by NAAT on urethral or urine specimens for men and endocervical
or urine specimens for women. Overall prevalence of TV infection among all
patients in the sample was 20.2%.
836 • CID 2014:59 (15 September) • Muzny et al
-
8/16/2019 Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla
4/8
determined by polymerase chain reaction) reported in the
2001–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
(NHANES), the most recent study of TV prevalence in the
United States [25]. It is also higher than in other STD clinic
populations (2%–18%) [26–29], including previous studies per-
formed at this clinic using wet mount [20]. This is likely due to
the improved sensitivity of NAAT compared with other diag-
nostic methods. Using data collected from 15 STD clinics,Meites et al found that TV prevalence (determined by wet
mount, culture, NAAT, or any other type of test) among symp-
tomatic women was 26.2% [30]. TV prevalence among women
in our study (27.0%) was similar but included both sympto-
matic and asymptomatic women. The lower TV prevalence
found among men in our study, compared with women, is likely
inuenced by the high rate (36%–69%) of spontaneous resolu-
tion of TV that is known to occur in men [19, 31]. Prevalence of
TV based on wet mount among women was 19.6%, suggesting
that TV would have gone undiagnosed in approximately one-
third of infected women had NAAT not been performed.Correlates of TV among men and women based on NAAT
included age (>40 years) and African American race, similar
to previous studies [3–5, 8, 12]. Unlike CT and GC [32], older
age is a signicant risk factor for TV in men and women [4],
perhaps due to accumulating infections caused by lack of detec-
tion. Potential reasons for the racial disparity have been previ-
ously discussed [5], although the fact that the majority of
patients seen in our clinic are of African American race may
have also inuenced this nding. Among men, having ≥5
PMNs per HPF (suggestive of NGU) on urethral Gram stain
was also correlated with TV; TV is known to be an important
cause of NGU [19]. Additional correlates of TV among women
included leukorrhea on wet mount, similar to that noted by Laz-
enby et al [33], elevated vaginal pH (TV prefers a high pH for
optimal growth) [18], positive whiff test, and concurrent gono-
coccal infection. Among men and women with a positive TVNAAT, 40.1% of men and 16.4% of women had not been treated
with metronidazole at the time of their initial clinic visit, signi-
fying missed opportunities for treatment.
It is noteworthy that the presence of urogenital symptoms
among men and women was not correlated with TV. This is
consistent with the ndings of Nye et al, which showed that
no symptoms were specic for any positive TV test [20]. In ad-
dition, similar to others [20], the results of our study suggest
that TV can often be a subclinical infection, as approximately
one-third of women with TV-positive results based on wet
mount and one-third of women with TV-positive resultsbased on NAAT did not complain of urogenital symptoms at
the time of their clinic visit.
We also found that TV was not associated with BV among
women. It has been suggested that TV may alter the vaginal mi-
crobiota in a manner that is favorable to its survival and trans-
missibility [34]. Hillier et al found that pregnant women with
intermediate Nugent scores [35] had the highest prevalence of
TV [36]. Martin et al corroborated this nding in a subset of 394
Table 2. Correlates of Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) Infection Among Men Undergoing TV Nucleic Acid Amplication Testing (n = 2514)
Characteristic
TV Negative
(n = 2267)
TV Positivea
(n= 247)
Unadjusted OR
(95% CI) P Value
Adjusted OR
(95% CI) P Value
Age, y
-
8/16/2019 Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla
5/8
nonpregnant women [34] whereas Brotman et al have shown
that intermediate vaginal ora or BV (based on Nugent score)
at a prior visit is associated with 1.5- to 2-fold increased risk for
incident TV among a cohort of 3620 nonpregnant women [37].
In vitro data suggest that TV grows better in an elevated pH
[38]; BV can provide this high-pH environment. TV itself
may also be able to manipulate the vaginal environment and
promote changes in the vaginal ora, leading to an elevated
pH. Indeed, the majority of women (82.9%) testing positivefor TV (based on NAAT) in our study had an elevated vaginal
pH (Table 3). Although a clinical diagnosis of BV was not cor-
related with TV, it would have been of interest to look at the dis-
tribution of Nugent scores among women testing TV positive to
see if they were in the abnormal range. However, we did not
have these data available.
An unexpected nding was that concurrent CT and GC
were associated with reduced likelihood of TV among men.
Explanations for this are unknown, although it could be related
to cumulative asymptomatic infection caused by TV in men as
opposed to symptomatic infection with CT or GC whereby men
would actively seek care at an STD clinic. Indeed, only 72 of 247
(29.1%) of men in this study positive for TV by NAAT had
complaints of urogenital symptoms (Table 2). Unfortunately,
we did not have the data available to know whether or not
men testing positive for TV reported being a contact to TV
upon presenting to the clinic; however, the fact that 59.5%were treated with metronidazole at the time of their visit
strongly suggests this. Conversely, concurrent GC was positively
associated with increased likelihood of TV among women. It
has been reported that TV is associated with GC in women
8%–50% of the time and that GC prevalence is 1.4–1.9 times
higher in women with TV than in women without TV [39].
This correlation between TV and GC has also been noted by
Lossick in a study of 3507 TV cases [40] and Lazenby et al in
Table 3. Correlates of Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) Infection Among Women Undergoing TV Nucleic Acid Amplication Testing (n = 3821)
Characteristic
TV Negative
(n = 2789)
TV Positivea
(n = 1032)
Unadjusted OR
(95% CI) P Value
Adjusted OR
(95% CI) P Value
Age, y
-
8/16/2019 Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla
6/8
a study of 294 women, of whom 16% had TV [ 33]. Similar toour results, a correlation between TV and CT has not been
noted in prior studies [40]. The biologic and/or social differenc-
es that account for these ndings are unknown. It could be hy-
pothesized that the demographic pool of CT infections among
women may be more diffuse than the pool of TV/GC infections
and that risk factors for acquiring CT are different than those
for acquiring TV/GC [40].
We originally hypothesized that women with TV wet mount–
negative, NAAT-positive results would have a lower burden of
disease due to TV and be less likely to have urogenital symptoms,
elevated vaginal pH, and leukorrhea on wet mount than womenwith TV wet mount–positive, NAAT-positive results. The results
of our study are somewhat consistent with this as women with an
elevated vaginal pH and leukorrhea had lower odds of having re-
sults that were TV wet mount negative, NAAT positive. Women
with urogenital symptoms initially also had a lower odds of hav-
ing TV wet mount–negative, NAAT-positive results, although
this nding lost its signicance in adjusted analysis. Only concur-
rent gonococcal infection was found to be signicantly correlated
with TV wet mount negativity, NAAT positivity. The biologicbasis for this unexpected nding is unknown. In terms of algo-
rithmic testing, the results of our study suggest that patients
with an elevated pH and leukorrhea on wet mount should be
evaluated with a more sensitive TV diagnostic test, preferably
NAAT, particularly if microscopy is negative for TV. Clearly,
all STD clinic clients should be screened for TV and reex testing
in general; that is, NAATs (particularly if wet mount is negative),
could be used as a cost-saving measure.
Our study has several limitations. First, data were collected
retrospectively, limiting the amount of sexual history (including
reason for clinic visit), clinical diagnosis, and laboratory data(including HIV testing results) able to be extracted. Because
of this, there may be additional correlates of TV not identied
here. Second, the results of this study were obtained from one
STD clinic in the southern United States and may not be gen-
eralizable to other clinical settings. Additionally, as only data
from the rst clinic visit per patient during the study time
frame was reviewed, we were unable to determine whether
men and women with TV had a new infection vs a persistent
Table 4. Comparison of Wet Mount Positivity/Negativity With Positive Nucleic Acid Amplication Test for Trichomonas vaginalis (n = 1021 Women Positive)a
Characteristic
TV Wet Mount−
(n= 301)
TV Wet Mount+
(n= 720)
TV-, Wet Mount/TV+
NAAT, Unadjusted
OR (95% CI) P Value
TV- Wet Mount/TV+
NAAT, Adjusted
OR (95% CI) P Value
Urogenital symptomsb 176 (58.5) 473 (65.7) 0.73 (.55–.96) .03 1.00 (.72–1.38) .98
Current laboratory diagnosis
Vaginal pHc
-
8/16/2019 Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla
7/8
or recurrent infection. Because of this, we were also unable to
determine the exact percentage of patients with a positive TV
NAAT who received treatment with metronidazole as we only
had data available from the clinic visit on the day in which
the NAAT was obtained.
Nevertheless, this study demonstrates that routine imple-
mentation of TV NAAT at our STD clinic was able to detect
a signicant proportion of infected male and female patients,
signicantly higher than that detected by wet mount alone inwomen. The TV NAAT can easily be implemented in clinical
settings as it can be run on the same instrumentation platforms
available for CT and GC testing. Improved detection of TV by
implementation of NAAT in men and women of all age groups
should be considered, as it will likely result in better control of
this common, treatable STI.
Notes
Acknowledgm ents. The authors thank Edwin Swiatlo, MD, PhD, for
helpful discussions on manuscript preparation.
Financial support. C. A. M. is supported in part by a developmental
grant from the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association.
Potential con icts of interest. J. R. S. has been a consultant for and re-
ceived research support from Hologic/GenProbe, BD Diagnostics, Cepheid,
and Embil Pharmaceuticals. All other authors report no potential conicts.
All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential
Conicts of Interest. Conicts that the editors consider relevant to the con-
tent of the manuscript have been disclosed.
References
1. World Health Organization. Global prevalence and incidence of select-
ed curable sexually transmitted infections, 2001. Available at: http://
www.who.int/hiv/pub/sti/who_hiv_aids_2001.02.pdf . Accessed 14 Jan-
uary 2014.
2. Cates W Jr. Estimates of the incidence and prevalence of sexually trans-mitted diseases in the United States. American Social Health Associa-
tion Panel. Sex Transm Dis 1999; 26(suppl 4):S2–7.
3. Sutton M, Sternberg M, Koumans EH, et al. The prevalence of Tricho-
monas vaginalis infection among reproductive-age women in the Unit-
ed States, 2001–2004. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45:1319–26.
4. Ginocchio CC, Chapin K, Smith JS, et al. Prevalence of Trichomonas
vaginalis and coinfection with Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria
gonorrhoeae in the United States as determined by the Aptima Tricho-
monas vaginalis nucleic acid amplication assay. J Clin Microbiol 2012;
50:2601–8.
5. Sorvillo F, Smith L, Kerndt P, et al. Trichomonas vaginalis, HIV, and
African-Americans. Emerg Infect Dis 2001; 7:927–32.
6. Sutcliffe S, Newman SB, Hardick A, et al. Prevalence and correlates of
Trichomonas vaginalis infection among female US federal prison in-
mates. Sex Transm Dis 2010; 37:585–90.7. Hobbs MM, Kazembe P, Reed AW, et al. Trichomonas vaginalis as a
cause of urethritis in Malawian men. Sex Transm Dis 1999; 26:381–7.
8. Joyner JL, Douglas JM Jr, Ragsdale S. Comparative prevalence of infec-
tion with Trichomonas vaginalis among men attending a sexually trans-
mitted diseases clinic. Sex Transm Dis 2000; 27:236–40.
9. Borchardt KA, al-Haraci S, Maida N. Prevalence of Trichomonas vagi-
nalis in a male sexually transmitted disease clinic population by inter-
view, wet mount microscopy, and the InPouch TV test. Genitourin Med
1995; 71:405–6.
10. Kaydos-Daniels SC, Miller WC, Hoffman I, et al. The use of specimens
from various genitourinary sites in men, to detect Trichomonas vagina-
lis infection. J Infect Dis 2004; 189:1926–31.
11. Krieger JN, Jenny C, Verdon M, et al. Clinical manifestations of tricho-
moniasis in men. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118:844–9.
12. Gaydos CA, Barnes MR, Quinn N, et al. Trichomonas vaginalis infection
in men who submit self-collected penile swabs after internet recruit-
ment. Sex Transm Infect 2013; 89:504–8.
13. McClelland RS, Sangare L, Hassan WM, et al. Infection with Trichomo-
nas vaginalis increases the risk of HIV-1 acquisition. J Infect Dis 2007;
195:698–702.
14. Cotch MF, Pastorek JG II, Nugent RP, et al. Trichomonas vaginalis as-
sociated with low birth weight and preterm delivery. The Vaginal Infec-
tions and Prematurity Study Group. Sex Transm Dis 1997; 24:353–60.
15. Workowski KA, Berman S; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. MMWR Re-
comm Rep 2010; 59:1–110.
16. Krieger JN, Tam MR, Stevens CE, et al. Diagnosis of trichomoniasis.
Comparison of conventional wet-mount examination with cytologic
studies, cultures, and monoclonal antibody staining of direct specimens.
JAMA 1988; 259:1223–7.
17. Huppert JS, Mortensen JE, Reed JL, et al. Rapid antigen testing com-
pares favorably with transcription-mediated amplication assay for
the detection of Trichomonas vaginalis in young women. Clin Infect
Dis 2007; 45:194–8.
18. Hobbs MM, Sena AC, Swygard H, et al. Trichomonas vaginalis an dtrichomoniasis. In: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Stamm WE, et al., eds.
Sexually transmitted diseases. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill,
2008:771–93.
19. Krieger JN, Verdon M, Siegel N, et al. Natural history of urogenital
trichomoniasis in men. J Urol 1993; 149:1455–8.
20. Nye MB, Schwebke JR, Body BA. Comparison of APTIMATrichomonas
vaginalis transcription-mediated amplication to wet mount
microscopy, culture, and polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of
trichomoniasis in men and women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200:
188. e1–7.
21. Schwebke JR, Hobbs MM, Taylor SN, et al. Molecular testing for Trich-
omonas vaginalis in women: results from a prospective U.S. clinical trial.
J Clin Microbiol 2011; 49:4106–11.
22. Van Der Pol B, Williams JA, Taylor SN, et al. Trichomonas vaginalis
DNA detection using self-obtained vaginal swabs with the BD ProbeTecQx Assay on the BD Viper System. J Clin Microbiol 2014; 52:885–9.
23. BachmannLH, Hobbs MM,SenaAC,et al.Trichomonas vaginalisgenital
infections: progress and challenges. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 53(suppl 3):
S160–72.
24. Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, et al. Nonspecic vaginitis. Diagnostic
criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 1983;
74:14–22.
25. Allsworth JE, Ratner JA, Peipert JF. Trichomoniasis and other sexually
transmitted infections: results from the 2001–2004 National Health and
Nutrition Examination Surveys. Sex Transm Dis 2009; 36:738–44.
26. Divekar AA, Gogate AS, Shivkar LK, et al. Disease prevalence in women
attending the STD clinic in Mumbai (formerly Bombay), India. Int J
STD AIDS 2000; 11:45–8.
27. Lo M, Reid M, Brokenshire M. Epidemiological features of women with
trichomoniasis in Auckland sexual health clinics: 1998–99. N Z Med J2002; 115:U119.
28. Swygard H, Sena AC, Hobbs MM, et al. Trichomoniasis: clinical man-
ifestations, diagnosis and management. Sex Transm Infect 2004;
80:91–5.
29. Garland SM, Tabrizi SN, Chen S, et al. Prevalence of sexually transmit-
ted infections (Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Tricho-
monas vaginalis, and human papillomavirus) in female attendees of a
sexually transmitted diseases clinic in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Infect
Dis Obstet Gynecol 2001; 9:143–6.
840 • CID 2014:59 (15 September) • Muzny et al
http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/sti/who_hiv_aids_2001.02.pdfhttp://www.who.int/hiv/pub/sti/who_hiv_aids_2001.02.pdfhttp://www.who.int/hiv/pub/sti/who_hiv_aids_2001.02.pdfhttp://www.who.int/hiv/pub/sti/who_hiv_aids_2001.02.pdfhttp://www.who.int/hiv/pub/sti/who_hiv_aids_2001.02.pdf
-
8/16/2019 Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Muzny 834 41 blabla bla
8/8
30. Meites E, Llata E, Braxton J, et al. Trichomonas vaginalis in selected U.S.
sexually transmitted disease clinics: testing, screening, and prevalence.
Sex Transm Dis 2013; 40:865–9.
31. Schwebke JR, Rompalo A, Taylor S, et al. Re-evaluating the treatment of
nongonococcal urethritis: emphasizing emerging pathogens—a ran-
domized clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52:163–70.
32. Datta SD, Sternberg M, Johnson RE, et al. Gonorrhea and chlamydia in
the United States among persons 14 to 39 years of age, 1999 to 2002.
Ann Intern Med 2007; 147:89–96.
33. Lazenby GB, Soper DE, Nolte FS. Correlation of leukorrhea and Trich-
omonas vaginalis infection. J Clin Microbiol 2013; 51:2323–7.
34. Martin DH, Zozaya M, Lillis RA, et al. Unique vaginal microbiota that
includes an unknown Mycoplasma-like organism is associated with
Trichomonas vaginalis infection. J Infect Dis 2013; 207:1922–31.
35. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial
vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of Gram stain interpre-
tation. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29:297–301.
36. Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Nugent RP, et al. Characteristics of three vaginal
ora patterns assessed by Gram stain among pregnant women. Vaginal
Infections and Prematurity Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;
166:938–44.
37. Brotman RM, Klebanoff MA, Nansel TR, et al. Bacterial vaginosis as-
sessed by gram stain and diminished colonization resistance to incident
gonococcal, chlamydial, and trichomonal genital infection. J Infect Dis
2010; 202:1907–15.
38. McGrory T, Meysick K, Lemchuk-Favel LT, et al. The interaction of Lac-
tobacillus acidophilus and Trichomonas vaginalis in vitro. J Parasitol
1994; 80:50–4.
39. Rein MF, Muller M. Trichomonas vaginalis. In: Holmes KK, Mardh PA,
Sparling PF, Weisner PJ, eds. Sexually transmitted diseases. New York:
McGraw-Hill, 1984: 525–35.
40. Lossick JG. Epidemiology of urogenital trichomoniasis. In: Honigberg
BM, ed. Trichomonads parasitic in humans. New York: Springer-
Verlag, 1989:311–23.
Trichomonas vaginalis Molecular Testing • CID 2014:59 (15 September) • 841