Climate Change - Role of Industry - Mr. Rambabu
-
Upload
cairn-india-limited -
Category
Business
-
view
173 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Climate Change - Role of Industry - Mr. Rambabu
Climate Change - Role of Industry
Sustainability
• Limits to Growth 1977
• Our Common Future 1987
• Rio Declaration 1992
• Rio +10 2002
• Rio +20 2012
What is the limiting Factor ?
• Finite Resources- Supportive Capacity of resources??
OR • Finite Assimilative Capacity ??
Climate Change is REAL…being monitored to calibrate action
• Politically agreed to limit the rise to 2oC over pre-industrial levels .
• National climate mitigation commitments still fall short by a giga ton.
• In pre Durban (December 2011) meetings, the nations have agreed to monitor , analyse, review and calibrate action
Emission Reduction Commitments
Canada ETS (2013)17% of 2005 by 2020• Dependent on US
legislation• Domestic voluntary
markets covering power and industry
Brazil*36-39% BAU by 2020
US (2012)17% of 2005 by 2020• Federal or state initiatives
like RGGI/ WCI/ AB 32Sectors covered• Power, • Industry, • upstream oil and gas-
later• Transport- 2015
EU ETS (2005)20% or 30% (conditional) of 1990 by 2020• Power & Industries• Sustained volumes till
2012
India *20-25% GDP emission intensity of 2005 by 2020• Emissions
intensity based commitment
China *40-45% GDP emission intensity of 2005 by 2020• Emissions
intensity based system
NZ ETS (2010)10-20% (conditional) of 1990 by 2020• Transport,
Energy, Industry
• Agriculture (intensity based)- 2015Low
MediumHigh
Level of ambition against Business as Usual (BAU)
South Africa*34% BAU by 2020
Australia ETS (2011)5% or 15-25% of 2000 (conditional) by 2020• Power,
industry, transport
Japan ETS (2011)25% (conditional) of 1990 by 2020• EU ETS like scheme by
2011. • Regional system for
office buildingsS. Korea (2010)4% of 2005 by 2020• Power,
Industry
Indonesia*26% BAU by 2020
Russian Fed15-25% of 1990 by 2020
* Voluntary in natureSource of Commitments: UNFCCC
Climate Regulations
Country Climate Legislations
Financial Markets Exceed Carbon Budgets Several Times
Spectrum of Possibilities
Increased efforts in GHG emission mitigation.
Promotion of renewables, energy efficiency, green tech and green fuels.
Domestic Regulations and Markets
Bilateral and Multilateral fungibility
International funding for GHG mitigation.
International Agreement with binding commitments and GHG emission reduction is a commodity and is globally fungible.
CertainUncertain
Corporate Actions are still….
• Decisions driven by “short term return" on capital investment• Initiatives driven "bottom up" with line managers or divisions. • Wait till scenario is clear…..Not too soon• “Good to do" …. good corporate social behaviour• Not integrated or loosely integrated to short and long term
organizational planning.
Shortcomings of Classic Corporate Actions
• Opportunistic approach in response to developing regulations• For the time being BaU….too late to respond!• Assets, liabilities do not capture climate related valuation/
devaluation. • Lacks methodical approach to capture climate impact in return of
investment projections. • Lack of system to methodically and continually apportion value
erosion because of climate impact (climate impact is like a step curve).
• Lacks systematic approach to unearth carbon asset identification.
Good Corporate Response to Climate Change
• Embedding climate consciousness in investment planning• Development of an integrated systematic approach to treat
climate related assets. • Development of a corporate view on evolving climate
regulation. • Establishing a feasible, long-term, credible climate strategy.
Good Practice • Understand the impact of your value chain: Reduce, reuse and
recycle• You can choose metrics to manage resources better and enhance
toplines: Efficient systems and processes (power usage, transport, material usage, water, etc)
• Lead by example: set the benchmarks for sustainability, get ahead of the curve.
• Innovate, Innovate, Innovate: Use technology and existing policies to your best advantage.
• Create commitment levels across the board for long term action plans and continuous monitoring and measurement.
• Giving back to the society: CSR projects, forestry projects, CSR foundation, support a voluntary carbon project.
Corporate Climate Steward- A Case
Roadmap to carbon/water neutrality
Inclusion of carbon and water positive businesses in the portfolio
Generate carbon and water reduction in the value chain
Utilise available renewable energy in the operations
Chose Community intervention to generate carbon and water offsets
Offsetting emissions through external projects/purchases
Carbon offsets
FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20
Net Emissions
tCO2104926 87761 92149 96757 101594 106674 112008 117608 123489
Micro irrigation
9261 11113 13336 16003 19204 23044
Watershed 20000 25000 35000 40000 40000 40000
Land managem
ent4000 4000 4400 5500 6600 7920
Total offsets
available33261 40113 52736 61503 65804 70964
Balance emissions to offset
-63496 -61481 -53938 -50505 -51804 -52525
Roadmap to carbon/water neutrality
Inclusion of carbon and water positive businesses in the portfolio
Generate carbon and water reduction in the value chain
Utilise available renewable energy in the operations
Chose Community intervention to generate carbon and water offsets
Offsetting emissions through external projects/purchases
Value chain improvements
• M&M FES has 600 dealers and 600 suppliers in the value chain.• An energy audit of these would enable M&M FES and the value chain partner to
understand the opportunities to implement operations improvement and energy efficiency measures to reduce carbon footprint. Again if these measures are bundled and developed into a carbon Project - these measures would be verified and accounted for, and carbon credits would be received.
• Value chain improvements viz. EE lighting systems, optimizing contract demand, specific energy optimisation., logistics improvements etc…
Assumption: If 10% of the suppliers and dealers at the upper end were targeted and minimum improvements were considered then 120 * 100= 12000 t Co2 will be generated annually for 10 years. However detailed study will need to be undertaken for the same
Roadmap to carbon/water neutrality
Inclusion of carbon and water positive businesses in the portfolio
Generate carbon and water reduction in the value chain
Utilise available renewable energy in the operations
Chose Community intervention to generate carbon and water offsets
Offsetting emissions through external projects/purchases
Green Power Sourcing
Plant F12 F13 FY14 % switch to green power
Replacement through green power (kwh)
Green power (Mwh)
Emission Reductions (tCO2e)
Kandivali 3,91,33,140 2,94,07,080 3,14,65,576 74% 2,32,49,062 23,249 21,157
Nagpur 1,39,40,446 1,80,60,317 1,93,24,539 74% 1,42,94,086 14,294 13,008
Rudrapur 69,02,175 63,97,790 68,45,635 50% 34,22,818 3,423 3,115
Jaipur 10,43,778 10,14,259 10,85,257 30% 3,25,577 326 296
Swaraj 1 1,66,05,000 1,28,91,100 1,37,93,477 50% 68,96,739 6,897 6,276
Swaraj2 1,37,93,700 1,45,61,800 1,55,81,126 50% 77,90,563 7,791 7,089
Total 9,14,18,239 8,23,32,346 8,80,95,610 5,59,78,845 55,979 50,941
Roadmap to carbon/water neutrality
Inclusion of carbon and water positive businesses in the portfolio
Generate carbon and water reduction in the value chain
Utilise available renewable energy in the operations
Chose Community intervention to generate carbon and water offsets
Offsetting emissions through external projects/purchases
Other CSR -ESOP opportunities for generating GHG ERS
The Clean Energy Clean water Campaign for rural villages (UNFCCC- PoA• Deploying energy efficient cook-stoves, zero energy water purifiers and CFLs to
rural households to meet energy and water needs
Community Development GHG ER opportunities
Opp Cost /unit Offsets
Cost of offsets
Community benefits
Ease of Implementation Scale
INR tCO2 INR Complexity Time UnitsOffsets (CERs)
Zero/low energy Water
Purifiers 2200 10 220
health, avoided
deforestationEasy 1 year 5000 10,000
EE Cook Stove 2200 10 220
health, avoided
deforestationEasy 1 year 5,000 10,000
Investment of INR 2.5 crores(total) in the years 2014 and 15 , can generate 20,000CERs during the years 2017-21 . Annual operating costs will be 40.0 lacs per year.
FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 TCO2(RE purchase
accounted - FY15 onwards)
104926 87761 92149 69112 69112 65657 67212 66512 66827
Micro irrigation
9261 11113 13336 16003 19204 23044
Watershed 20000 25000 35000 40000 40000 40000
Land mgmt 4000 4000 4400 5500 6600 7920
Total offsets 33261 40113 52736 61503 65804 70964RE
purchase*( accounted in
emissions cal.
27645 27645 31100 29545 30245 29930 30072
Value Chain Imp.
12000 12000 12000 12000 12000
CSR 20000 20000 20000 20000 20000 20000
Surplus Credits
-15851 3001 19079 26291 31292 36137
Neutrality Achieved Achieved Achieved Achieved Achieved
Suggested Roadmap ( with RE accounted for)
Summary
The entity through climate neutral practice achieved the following:
Demonstrated Social Responsibility Prepared for emerging carbon constraints Improved Energy and Cost efficiencies in operations and
supply chain Improved relationship with the suppliers and community Future proofed its business portfolio
Climate.Value.
Delivered.